Wednesday, June 20, 2018

Judicial Watch sues Department of State


Judicial Watch sues Department of State for failure to respond to FOIA request on Obama secret selection of new resettlement sites


Ann Corcoran
June 20, 2018

Long time readers will remember that for a couple of years we were on a hunt to reveal the forty plus new resettlement sites the US State Department was quietly targeting for placement of the huge flow of refugees they expected in the waning years of the Obama Administration (and planning ahead for the Hillary years to come!).

We were able to identify some sites in various stages of planning just because local newspapers reported that their town was being chosen (or might be chosen), but there was never any official release of information from the DOS.

Thus, Judicial Watch went to work to try to uncover the list and the criteria being used to select new sites.

In December 2016 this is a list I had put together from various news reports:

Below are new sites we have identified so far of the supposed 47 the Obama Administration is (or has been) trying to get established.

One of the first things the Trump Administration must do is to make all of this information public information.  Here are some of the sites we have identified so far by just keeping an eye on local news reports in 2015 and 2016:

(again, this is a list from 2016!)

Asheville, NC (not decided yet)
Rutland, VT (approved, waiting)
Reno, NV (open)
Ithaca, NY
Missoula, MT (open)
Aberdeen, SD (not now)
Charleston, WV (approved, see Senator Capito as the Frau Merkel of WV!)
Fayetteville, AR
Blacksburg, VA
Pittsfield, MA
Northhampton, MA
Flint, MI
Bloomington, IN (dead for now)
Traverse City, MI
Poughkeepsie, NY
Wilmington, DE
Hudson, WI (dead for now?)
Watertown, NY (maybe)
Youngstown, OH (maybe)
Storm Lake, Iowa
Sante Fe, NM (approved but on hold)

Judicial Watch wants to know more!

Judicial Watch logo

Why is that important?

Besides keeping the State Department accountable, you know and I know that when Trump is no longer President, the deep staters and the refugee contractors *** will go right back to their previous ways (including identifying prospective new resettlement sites) UNLESS Trump makes permanent changes through legislation to the US Refugee Admissions Program.

One place to start will be to make it the law that local citizens will no longer be kept in the dark in the development and planning process for these sites.

Press release from Judicial Watch on June 18, 2018:

Judicial Watch Sues State Department for Obama-Era Records on Refugee Resettlement Site Locations

(Washington, DC) — Judicial Watch announced today that it filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia for records on sites that were considered for the resettlement of refugees in the United States during the last two years of the Obama administration. (Judicial Watch vs. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:18-cv-01244)

Judicial Watch filed the lawsuit after the State Department failed to respond to a February 23, 2017, FOIA request seeking:

~All records reflecting the locations within the United States that were considered as possible sites for refugee resettlement under the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program (USRAP) in 2015 and 2016.

~All records reflecting the criteria used to determine suitability of locations as refugee resettlement sites in 2015 and 2016.

~All records reflecting the names of local organizations promoting any of the locations identified above for consideration as refugee resettlement sites.

In October 2016, Judicial Watch made public 128 pages of documents it obtained from the mayor of Rutland, Vermont, showing a concerted effort by the mayor and a number of private organizations to conceal from the public their plans to resettle 100 Syrian refugees into the small southern Vermont town. 

The mayor and resettlement organizations shrouded the plan in such secrecy that not even the town’s aldermen were informed of what was taking place behind closed doors. 

The aldermen eventually wrote to the U.S. Department of State protesting the plan and opened an investigation into the mayor’s actions.

The State Department says it currently works with nine nonprofit organizations to resettle refugees. Those nonprofits have about 315 affiliates in 180 communities throughout the U.S. (Check out these organizations and you will discover they are covers for the NWO plans to destroy this nation.)

Go here for more and to follow JW links.

We know the Obama Administration didn’t believe in transparency, but we expect more of Trump’s State Department, so we assume the information will be forthcoming!

Truthfully readers, there will be no lasting reform of the refugee program in the US until this contracting system is abolished.  The President can reduce numbers for awhile, but these nine (and their hundreds of subcontractors) receiving the majority of their funding from taxpayers and then acting as Left wing community organizers (holding rallies, ginning up bad publicity against the President) must go and that will require Congress to rewrite refugee law.

Below) are the big nine ‘non-profit’ organizations that monopolize all refugee resettlement in the US.  The six ‘religious’ contractors are part of the politically active Religious Left.  They worked with local Interfaith groups to secretly set up new resettlement sites in the heyday of the Obama Administration.

https://refugeeresettlementwatch.wordpress.com/2018/06/20/judicial-watch-sues-department-of-state-for-failure-to-respond-to-foia-request-on-obama-secret-selection-of-new-resettlement-sites/#more-168015


Readers, the plan to 'resettle' muslims nationwide in our nation is obama's and hitlery's efforts to take down this nation, turning it over to islam to suffer all the negative issues now going on throughout the nations in Europe. The people there are rising up against their 'governments' for not only allowing this resettlement to occur but even actively participating in MAKING IT HAPPEN. The people have had enough and civil demonstrations and even violence against the resettlement efforts and the governments are taking place now.

If your city is on this list and you don't want your community taken over by muslims and sharia law, then consider getting the word out IN YOUR COMMUNITY.  Contact the community 'elected' officials and your congress critters and demand they NOT pursue this effort to bring in thousands of muslims in to your areas but demand they REJECT it or you will no longer have a city, county, state OR country.  Organize MARCHES, SIGNS, ADVERTISING, ATTEND THE COUNCIL MEETINGS, ETC. AND DEMAND THE COMMUNITY 'LEADERS' RETRACT THEIR OFFERS AND PLANS TO BRING IN/RESETTLE THE MUSLIMS.

SUPPORT THE EFFORTS OF JUDICIAL WATCH. THEY ARE ACTING ON YOUR BEHALF AMERICA!

https://refugeeresettlementwatch.wordpress.com/2018/06/20/judicial-watch-sues-department-of-state-for-failure-to-respond-to-foia-request-on-obama-secret-selection-of-new-resettlement-sites/#more-168015


1 comment:

Anonymous said...

My opinion: Alexandre Bissonnette is << a little lost >> young adult, but he was aware of danger of muslim immigration - he did it, to protect his family - ( he drank, to be able to do it, could not do it, sober ) - the most important , he should not have had access this easily, to guns - - He really thought, being a hero , accomplishing this , then killing himself - - - -

Now the muslim crowd, want the maximum punishment, 25 years for each one killed - - - - Alexandre Bissonnette pleaded guilty in March, to six charges of first-degree murder, and six of attempted murder. He could get consecutive sentences, which could mean up to 150 years, in prison. But his legal team says 150 years is equivalent to a sentence of death by incarceration. https://montreal.ctvnews.ca/mosque-shooter-s-lawyers-to-ask-for-sentence-of-no-more-than-25-years-1.3872171 -

Bissonnette’s lawyer, Charles-Olivier Gosselin, has portrayed his client, as an anxious and fragile man, and suggested he be eligible for parole, after 25 years. - “all the families of the victims … want an exemplary sentence. They want the maximum, the law allows.” Bissonnette was described by his defence team, as a sick young man, but someone who can be rehabilitated, and who has repeatedly shown remorse, shame, and who has been described by experts, as representing a low to moderate risk of recidivism. A consecutive sentence, would “annihilate” Bissonnette’s chances of rehabilitation, and rob him of hope, Gosselin said. - - SEE THIS VIDEO: https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=9&v=AD93hIRrZJk - - -
he wanted to save people and his family, from ( muslim ) terrorists attacks:
http://vancouversun.com/news/quebec-mosque-shooting-bissonnette-fights-150-year-death-sentence/wcm/95f61d0a-9b42-4ab6-b740-a1a09ec8b3cb?video_autoplay=true - - *** http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=101515 - - -