Tuesday, November 6, 2018

G. Griffin report today 11/5/18


Overdose Deaths Soared to 70,000 Deaths last Year, Yet FDA Approves New Painkiller that Is 1000 Times More Powerful than Morphine


The FDA approved a powerful new opioid painkiller called Dsuvia that’s 10 times stronger than fentanyl, the deadly synthetic opioid that’s been blamed for the record number of drug overdose deaths recorded in 2017, and 1,000 times more powerful than morphine.  The potential that the drug will be diverted and abused is likely.  The FDA ignored the objections of lawmakers and its own advisory committee in the process.  AcelRx, the manufacturer of Dsuvia, anticipates $1.1 billion in annual sales, and hopes to have its product in hospitals early next year.  Public health risks pale in comparison to the enormous profits that the company stands to reap from sales. ..continue article here



New York: Mother Loses Custody of Her Son with Leukemia for Refusing Chemotherapy After He Was Given Clean Bill of Health


Candace Gundersen, who’s a holistic wellness coach, is fighting to have her 13-year old son removed from chemotherapy treatment for acute leukemia after he was given a clean bill of health by doctors.  Gunderson was told when her son was diagnosed that if she refused chemotherapy treatment for him, Child Protective Services (CPS) would have her removed and her son would receive treatment anyway, so she signed the consent forms.  The boy had a serious adverse reaction and she refused further outpatient treatments, as she planned to pursue alternative care for him, prompting a doctor to call CPS.  The boy was seized and will be forced to get treatments for three years, the standard for care, even though the cancer was declared gone...Continue article and video here


San Francisco Voted to Allow Water to Flow into Ocean, in the Name of Environmentalism,  Instead of Sending it to Farmers to Spite President Trump

California: The Bay Delta Plan that would require the rivers in the San Joaquin watershed to maintain 40% of unimpeded flow into the ocean from February to June, more than twice the current amount of water, which would decrease the amount of water to farmers.  The city of San Francisco voted for the Bay Delta Plan to spite President Trump as he threatened to sue if it was implemented, as it would interfere with the operation of key reservoirs owned by the federal government in the San Joaquin Valley.  If this plan is implemented, it will drive up water rates as the city is compelled to seek out new, pricey supplies, such as desalination.
Update: Surprisingly, San Francisco Mayor London Breed sided with conservatives and vetoed the Supervisors’ unanimous vote for water restrictions that would affect the city’s own water supply...Continue article here


Jewish Law Professor Accuses ADL of Fudging Statistics To Make Anti-Semitism Appear More Prevalent Than It Really Is


Jonathan Greenblatt of the Jewish Anti-Defamation League (ADL) said that anti-Semitism, including “wild anti-Semitic conspiracy theories about Jewish financiers like George Soros manipulating world events,” must be censored and stopped. He said there has been a 57% increase in harassment, vandalism, and violence in 2017.
In response, professor David Bernstein, at the George Mason University School of Law, wrote that the ADL’s study is false. He cites numerous flaws in the study, including the fact that it included 193 incidents of bomb threats to Jewish institutions that were not motivated by anti-Semitism at all but just the opposite. They were discovered to have been committed by an 18-year old Jewish boy who, apparently, was bent on creating sympathy for the Jewish community...Continue article here


Chris Farrell of Judicial Watch Was Banned from Fox News for Saying the “Soros-Occupied State Department” Is Funding the Caravan


Last week, Fox News banned Chris Farrell, who is the director of investigations and research for Judicial Watch after he claimed on the Lou Dobb’s Show that the “Soros-occupied State Department” was funding the large caravan of migrants at the US border. Apparently, this statement of simple truth was viewed by Fox News as anti-Semitic....Continue article and video here


New York: Synagogue Vandal with Hateful Message Has Been Identified. He Is a Black Leftist, Not a White Supremacist.


Days after the synagogue shooting in Pittsburgh, a synagogue in Brooklyn was the site of vandalism with messages written with a black marker that read, “Die Jew rats. We are here,” “Jews better be ready,” and “Hitler.”  Immediately, the media blamed this on white supremacy.  However, surveillance video shows a young black man scrawling the messages. He has been identified as James Polite, 26 who, according to his known leftist political activities, may be a former Obama volunteer. A local TV station reported that Polite could be behind a series of fires at other shuls and yeshivas in the area. -GEG...Continue article here

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

I can say it over and over again, but no one listens.

Stop signing their agreements.
It's all contracts.

Holistic coach son taken away and he's given chemotheraphy

This is in the article...I didn't make it up - but if it was missing from the article I would be telling you she signed a contract

Read it for yourself:

Child Protective Services (CPS) would have her removed and her son would receive treatment anyway, so she signed the consent forms.

People sign their children into school and have some sort of rush to see how fast they can en-roll their child and get out of there....and they give all kinds of rights to the school and the school nurse.

People sign documents when CPS take the kids away, agreeing to jump through hoops to get their kids back...Duh! they took the kids without a contract...you have a better chance of getting them back when there is no contract between you than if there is a contract.


And the remedy is!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
Rescission of signature

If a contract has terms that are without full disclosure and those terms are not a meeting of the minds, then you can rescind your signature and the parties are back where they were when they first met.

But no, you will sign, be in a contract, then go fight the agreement you agreed to, and a judge will see the contract, see it was not signed Under Coercion or under duress, and rule for the side that is holding the paper that has YOUR signature on it.

How you like that?

You will appeal to the president, and he'll be told there is a contract.
You will appeal to all kinds of people, but guess what; the problem was caused by us and we blame someone else, when if we did not sign contracts with strangers, we'd have our power.

An example of signing it under coercion, is when that is the first words on the line, and if the line is not long enough after under coercion is written, that's not your fault is it? But at least your intention is shown as soon as you started writing, and if there is enough room for your first name, go ahead and put it, but your last name as an example would not have to be on there because no one can tell you how to sign, and you are signing under coercion and your first name shows it was you that signed it under coercion or if they are holding you captive, then under duress, but
they have deceptive ways.

They told her, your son is healthy, and then she signed, so she didn't sign under coercion while her son was healthy, but where is her caveat, that this document is void if you are wrong and my son is not healthy and you did not provide full disclosure.

Some people will say you can't write on their contracts, you can only sign. Well, you can sign, it's valid on with the attachment of restrictions on a separate piece of paper, and then sign.

When you sign first and then write your provisions, they follow your signature and are not enforceable, that's why you don't sign a contract at the top of the page before all the stipulations, because then anything after the signature would be useless.
So don't sign and then write after it, under coercion, make that first, make it first, make it on top, above, and sealed by your signature that follows...your signature is like putting that document into a laminating machine..it's locked and everything on that paper is locked in by the time you complete that signature.