North Korea was paid 3 billion dollars to saber rattle and BULLSHIT a nuclear threat

April12, 2013

North Korea PAID OFF FOR SHOW

North Korea was paid 3 billion dollars to saber rattle and BULLSHIT a nuclear threat

It's ALL A SHOW FOLKS, but a nuke QUITE POSSIBLY WILL GO OFF, COMPLIMENTS OF THE ISRAELI MOSSAD.

I have this story NAILED TO THE WALL BELOW, READ THE FOLLOWING, I AM LEAVING THIS TOP POSTED UNTIL THIS SHOW IS OVER.
If you want to know why this site is hated and censored, look at what is below with regard to North Korea and the RCEP. I'd bet a $50 that the Mossad is aboard an Israeli submarine, standing by and waiting for orders to launch on an unwitting North Korea's behalf. And if a sub is not used, it is a near certainty that An OWL will hoot

Is the RCEP the real reason for North Korea's behavior?

North Korea may have been paid to act belligerent and unwittingly provide the perfect cover for an Israeli sponsored nuclear false flag

The zionist banker group may appear to be powerful to America and Europe, because America and Europe are tightly within it's grasp. However, their hold on the world economy via the U.S. dollar may not be all it is cracked up to be.
The Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership which could be compared to an oriental form of NAFTA presents a serious threat to the superiority of the dollar as a reserve currency in the global economic marketplace. Combined, the RCEP member states have a GDP much larger than the United States, and as a group, via the RCEP agreement, these countries have agreed to trade with each other via their own currencies, thus bypassing the need to use the US dollar as a trade medium.
The RCEP took form on November 20th, 2012. And that date is significant - Think back a while - when did North Korea begin acting so belligerently? When did they do their nuke test? When did they launch their missile that probably got shot down? The timeline fits. And North Korea sits within the RCEP group of nations. I'd bet they are getting paid to act belligerently.
Now the focus is away from Iran. It's all North Korea now. Why did the zionists suddenly begin ignoring Iran, only to put the spotlight on North Korea? Could it be that there is a greater economic threat looming for their Rockefeller banker dollar, a threat greater than Iran's private central bank? I would hedge my bet that ANY country capable of owning and running a nuclear reactor, ANY country capable of building rockets and nuclear warheads, is not too stupid to do the math and understand that 2 or 3 nuclear warheads launched from an area a few hundred kilometers across to a target that is enormous is a stupid idea, when the target can respond with thousands of nuclear warheads in return. I don't think North Korea is serious with any of these threats, and I would bet that instead, there is a greater chance that NK has been given an incentive by the Rothchild or Rockefeller bankers and their cronies to act belligerently on the world stage in exchange for a payoff.
I would bet they have been told to make a little noise, and nothing will happen. Just do not launch. And what happens next? How about making a few of Magna BSP's owls hoot? It would be a pristine false flag. After all, North Korea said they would do it, RIGHT? Think about that - NK threatens. Something goes BOOM. Perfect setup; - and then, the Rockefeller group rolls their military right into the midst of the RCEP nations, breaks lots of stuff, and re-instates it's own economic order, complete with forced dollar compliance.Far fetched idea? I don't think it is too far off the mark at all.

CONFIRMED

Incentive given to North Korea CONFIRMED
Aangirfan is a top level truther who digs very deep and is highly credible. Aangirfan has found a report which confirms that North Korea did indeed get a massive payoff, My only variance from AAngirfan's perspective is that I believe Kim Jong has eaten the bait and will now be hooked into taking the rap in a nuclear a false flag.
The obvious problem with North Korea playing along is that Kim Jong probably does not know that Israel has nukes planted in many places around the world, waiting for a PRIME false flag opportunity. Kim Jong is providing this opportunity. And he, even with a payoff of 3 billion, is likely to be getting the shaft big time. I would say that there is a high probability of a nuke going off somewhere now, and that Kim Jong will not be responsible, but he will definitely have the blame rammed down his throat. To get a firm understanding of Israel's nuclear strategy, which is what makes situations like this one with North Korea so dangerous, make sure you have read my report NUCLEAR BLACKMAIL

Quake near Bushehr Iran probably a warning shot

I have concluded that the quake near Bushehr Iran was not likely to have been natural. There are several reasons for this. However, a nuclear weapon test or nuclear warning shot can be ruled out fairly easily. I have not been able to find a seismogram for the 6.3 that happened this morning, but I did find a six megabyte text file containing the raw data in text format which amounted to a once per millisecond readout of the peak intensities of the quake. From reading this data, it appears that the quake had a preamble before reaching peak intensity, which does not happen with a nuclear weapon. However -
The quake, as is usual for Haarp quakes, happened at a depth of 10 KM according to the USGS, and 12 KM according to the Iranians, who pegged the intensity at a 6.1. This shallow depth is indicative of a Haarp triggered earthquake, all of the Haarp quakes thus far have been shallow quakes happening at a depth of 10 KM, - that 10 KM depth was spoken of in the mails from Japan, as well as a spinning feeling to the quake rather than the bumps and jolts typical of a natural quake.
For those of you who do not know about earthquake intensities and damage that can be caused - seismic readings only loosely correlate with how strong the quake feels at the surface. A seismic intensity reading only tells you how much energy was released during a quake. So if the quake is shallow, at 10 KM depth, a natural six will shake the surface badly, and the effects will be localized. If the same natural six quake occurred at 100 km depth, it would not shake the surface above it as much, but it would be felt a greater distance away. This rule applies to natural earthquakes
Haarp quakes appear to behave differently. All haarp quakes so far have been shallow earthquakes which are not as damaging to the surface above them as their seismic equivalent would indicate they should have been if they happened at such a shallow depth, yet they can be felt a great distance away from the epicenter, which should also not be possible of a quake occurring at such a shallow depth. After this quake, there were reports from across the Persian gulf,(a great distance away for a low six quake to affect) that the quake badly swayed buildings in a few of the major coastal cities, and had a smooth spinning feel to it. This spinning feeling was also reported of the 3/11 Japan quake and aftershocks, where initially people in Japan, who are well accustomed to the feel of earthquakes, did not recognize the earthquakes as being quakes at all, and attributed the shaking to other causes. (if you read through the mails from Japan, they speak all about how the quake and aftershocks did not appear to be natural)
The Bushehr earthquake was of short duration, and I would expect the death toll to be fairly low, despite the shallow depth simply because it appears to have been a Haarp quake.
All of what I have said above could be changed, it is too soon after this quake for any other news about it to become available. But the 10 KM depth and the fact that it was only a low six combined with the fact that it was strongly felt across the gulf hints to me at least one thing - it did not happen naturally at all. Iran issued a statement about the nuclear power facility at Busher, which has thus far amounted to them stating that the facility was designed to handle a larger quake than this.

UPDATE:

The quake was indeed minor at the surface for a 6.3 at 10 KM depth, and resulted in 37 deaths and 100 additional hospitalizations, which are extremely low numbers for such a shallow quake at that intensity. Iran is an ancient country with many old structures that do not survive earthquakes well (though the modern cities are very well built). The low casualty numbers pretty much give this one away. One curiosity - the nuclear facility reported that its operations were unaffected. This is odd, because they did not even mention shutting down which is normal procedure for even a minor tremor (sub 4 range).
http://www.jimstonefreelance.com/