Monday, September 16, 2013

Press release: A total nonsense response submitted by 2 attorneys from the Department of Justice and SSN

What does it take to get ride of this phony criminal in the office of the presidency?  Five years and still nothing is done!

Obama's Fraudulent Use of H. Bounel's Soc. Security Number...

Press release: A total nonsense response submitted by 2 attorneys from the Department of Justice and SSN

From Orly Taitz
Posted on | September 16, 2013
Department of Justice and SSA provided a total nonsense response to my motion for Summary Judgment
They are not denying that Social Security number 042-68-4425 was assigned to Bounel. They de facto admit it. If this number was not assigned to Bounel and he was born 123 years ago, they had to simply provide his SS-5 application, it would have shown a different number and it would be the end of it. If it will show that the number is indeed 042-68-4425, then Obama and all of his accomplices go to prison. Instead, they are violating their own 120 year rule and refusing to produce Bounel’s SS-5 because they admit that someone else is using this number today. Since Obama posted this number with his tax returns, we know that he is using it, so we know that he is using a stolen a number. Because Obama is using Bounel’s stolen number today, they refuse to release Bounel’s SS-5 application.

In my opinion this is pure and simple fraud and treason committed by the acting Commissioner of SSA Carolyn Colvin, her SSA attorney and US Attorneys. They are de facto admitting to being complicit in the cover up. Attorney Taitz is supposed to reply within 1 week. She will be compiling a list of cases, where people were prosecuted for using stolen Social Security numbers. If any of the supporters are aware of any such cases, please provide the information.


This whole situation would be akin to someone stealing your house, squatting in your house by using a fabricated deed and paying off a corrupt city clerk to keep your original deed sealed . You demand from the city hall a copy of the original deed to the house to prove to the court that this is your house. The city clerk responds by saying that he cannot release the original deed in your name because the thief is using your house now. This is a complete idiocy.

No comments: