The
          first function of the founders of nations, after          the 
founding itself, is to devise a set of true          falsehoods about 
origins - a mythology - that          will make it desirable for 
nationals to continue          to live under common authority, and, 
indeed,          make it impossible for them to entertain          
contrary thoughts - Forrest McDonald (E          Pluribus Unum)
The US 
Constitution was created on September 17, 1787, and ratified behind 
closed doors on June 21, 1788. Thirty nine of the fifty five delegates 
attending the Philadelphia Convention signed the document. Their con job
 is evident from the very first line penned. Legally, the "People" 
mentioned are not sovereign beings, but willing slaves who have been granted the illusion of freedom.
From an occult point of view the Constitution was ratified on an Atonist festival day. It is, therefore, a patently Solar Cult document. This is because the date of ratification - June 21st - is the day the sun ascends to its highest point in the zodiac.
From an occult point of view the Constitution was ratified on an Atonist festival day. It is, therefore, a patently Solar Cult document. This is because the date of ratification - June 21st - is the day the sun ascends to its highest point in the zodiac.
Washington presided 
on a low rostrum in the Assembly Hall (where the Declaration of 
Independence had been approved) from his “rising sun chair.” The top of 
the chair showed half a sun with two eyes and a nose and thirteen rays 
like hair. Above it on a stem hung a pyramid-shaped plant. The whole is a
 Templar image. As the delegates sign the new Constitution, Benjamin 
Franklin told them that the sun on Washington’s chair was rising, not 
setting on the new union - Nicholas Hagger (The Secret History of the West) 
 |    
Benjamin Franklin, 
James Madison and Alexander Hamilton were three of the men who framed 
the infernal Constitution and pushed for its ratification. Their 
document served the American aristocracy, not the people. In fact the 
document was never put before the people for ratification, and was 
openly opposed by the majority of men and women in the original thirteen
 states, who resisted coming together to form any kind of unified 
nation. Facts of this sort have been deliberately concealed through the 
decades, but are now openly accepted by some mainstream American 
historians, such as Joseph Ellis, Thomas DiLorenzo, and others.
The Constitutionalists were guileful traitors whose attendance at the Philadelphia Convention was kept secret for an entire generation. Their document served to leave the "door" of America unlocked and ajar, so the country's foreign enemies could surreptitiously re-enter in the days and years following the supposed War of Independence.
The Constitutionalists were guileful traitors whose attendance at the Philadelphia Convention was kept secret for an entire generation. Their document served to leave the "door" of America unlocked and ajar, so the country's foreign enemies could surreptitiously re-enter in the days and years following the supposed War of Independence.
Benjamin Franklin, James Madison and Alexander Hamilton - architects of monarchy in disguise
The
           hypocrisy and duplicity of the Federalists is           
responsible for modern neo-imperialism           and advent of the 
so-called New World Order.           In our opinion these men were 
little more than British           agents, because King George himself -
 who declared eternal war on           America - could           not have done as much damage to America as           their actions wrought.
Such
 a tyrannical future where            property rights would be ignored, 
where            a massive standing army would lurk            
unchallengeable, where Congressmen would            hold office for 
life, where ruinous            treaties would be commonplace, where     
       Presidential powers would make Nero            jealous, where 
gold and silver would            vanish from circulation to be replaced 
           by the worthless "notes" of a private            banking 
conglomeration, where the States            would be reduced to mere 
administrative            departments of the feds, and where the        
    grasp of taxation would actually reach            into the common 
laborer's paycheck - all            this was too fantastic to be even   
         theoretically contemplated during the            ratification 
debates - Kenneth W.            Royce (Hologram of Liberty) 
 |    
When
 the           duplicitous Hamilton was asked           why he helped 
draft the           Constitution, he guardedly replied:
       My motives must remain in the depository of my own breast.
He           was but 
one member of the           Philadelphia Convention who secretly        
   resented the independence of America. One           perceptive 
dissenter realized this and           wrote:
The 
Continental convention...was            composed of some men of 
excellent            characters; of others who were more            
remarkable for their ambition and            cunning, than their 
patriotism; and of            some who have been opponents to the       
     independence of the United States -            (Dissenting Address of the Pennsylvanian            Convention, 18 December 1787) 
 |    
Hamilton was a member
 of the traitorous Society of the Cincinnati, named after the Roman 
dictator. This elitist order included George Washington as head and 
Major General Henry Knox as secretary. Both men were card-carrying 
Freemasons and Federalists. They and their cohorts planned to subvert 
and destroy the American Republic, replacing it with an oligarchy.
...this Constitution was a strange 
occurrence. Before that time, there was no such thing as a nation being 
ruled by a constitution. Countries were ruled by kings who granted some 
rights to the people. Yet governance by constitution had existed in 
Masonic lodges for hundreds of years - Sanford Holst (Sworn in Secret: Freemasonry and the Knights Templar) 
 |    
James
 Madison is considered the "father" of           the US Constitution. He
 was heavily           influenced, as were many American           
politicians, by the philosophy of French           aristocrat Baron de 
Montesquieu who           believed in monarchy. Madison was also        
   influenced by the writings of British           empiricist 
philosopher John Locke,            himself           "a major investor 
in the English slave trade           through the Royal Africa Company." 
Madison was           vehemently opposed to state independence and      
     pushed the Constitution to keep power out of the hands of ordinary 
          Americans. He openly advocated an           anti-Republican 
ideology and commented on how illiterate masses should be divided and   
        controlled:
Where a 
majority are united by a            common sentiment, and have an       
     opportunity, the rights of the minor            party become 
insecure. In a republican            government the majority, if united,
 have            always an opportunity. The only remedy            is to
 enlarge the sphere and thereby divide the            community into so 
great a number of            interests and parties that, in the first   
         place, a majority will not be likely, at            the same 
moment, to have a common            interest separate from that of the  
          whole, or of the minority; and, in the            second 
place, that, in case they should            have such an interest, they 
may not be            so apt to unite in the pursuit of it            - (Elliot's Debates, Vol. 5) 
 |    
Madison
 was the only delegate to keep           records of proceedings at the 
Convention.           However, his notes were not made public           
until four years after his death.           Prior to their public release the           notes had           been thoroughly edited. 
The con is evident from the Constitution's Preamble, as we said. In fact the "People" referred to are not citizens of America, No! They are the elites who rule from within a legally separate precinct known as the District of Columbia. This district is under federal control and the government operating from within it is, legally speaking, a foreign institution. The term "We the People" denotes this separate ruling elite. It refers to the imperious overlords who have granted the Constitution to the masses within the "United States of America" - the non-sovereign nation under their control. Therefore, the entity mentioned in the first line of the Preamble is not the same entity mentioned in the last line. Let's read it again and uncover the cunning artifice of its authors:
The con is evident from the Constitution's Preamble, as we said. In fact the "People" referred to are not citizens of America, No! They are the elites who rule from within a legally separate precinct known as the District of Columbia. This district is under federal control and the government operating from within it is, legally speaking, a foreign institution. The term "We the People" denotes this separate ruling elite. It refers to the imperious overlords who have granted the Constitution to the masses within the "United States of America" - the non-sovereign nation under their control. Therefore, the entity mentioned in the first line of the Preamble is not the same entity mentioned in the last line. Let's read it again and uncover the cunning artifice of its authors:
           
We the People of the United States, in            Order to form a more 
perfect Union,            establish Justice, ensure domestic            
Tranquility, provide for the common            defense, promote the 
general Welfare,            and secure the Blessings of Liberty to      
      ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain            and establish 
this Constitution for the            United States of America. 
 |    
This           is what the Preamble subtextually infers:
WE
 THE RULING ARISTOCRACY, in Order to            form a more perfect 
Union, establish            Justice, ensure domestic Tranquility,       
     provide for the common defense, promote            the general 
Welfare, and secure the            Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and
            our Posterity, do ordain and establish            this 
Constitution FOR THE SLAVES WITHOUT RIGHTS, UNDER OUR            FEDERAL
 CONTROL. 
Because "People" is capitalized it is a proper noun referring to a specific body of people - Kenneth W. Royce (Hologram of Liberty)  |    
These
 facts explain why the word              "for" is found in the last 
line, not the word "of." Legally,              there is a big difference
              between:
            ...do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
and:
            ...do ordain and establish this Constitution of the United States of America.
The first rendering implies the Constitution has been              granted
 to one body by              another. Ergo the Constitution             
 is nothing more than a              totalitarian document, ratifying   
           aristocratic control over the              "United States of 
America" and              its inhabitants. The elites are              
literally saying: "This document              and its articles are for              you." The point being that it              is not of
 you, meaning,              it is not yours by natural              
right. The word "for" indicates              that the matter of the     
         document is bestowed or imposed          
   by others. And of course when a              person gives someone 
something,              they presumably want something              in 
return. This was certainly              the case for the cunning 
Federalists who             conceived the Constitution.
Suggestively, the word "of" does appear in a meaningful legal declaration. It appears in the text of the Presidential Oath:
Suggestively, the word "of" does appear in a meaningful legal declaration. It appears in the text of the Presidential Oath:
I solemnly 
swear (or affirm) that I will            faithfully execute the Office 
of            President of the United States, and will            to the
 best of my Ability, preserve,            protect and defend the 
Constitution of            the United States. 
 |    
In
 this instance, the word "of" designates the President as a             
 member of the aristocratic              elite - denoted by the words 
"United States." He is, therefore, a ruler             separate from
 the              citizens in the various states. The "for" does not    
          apply to the President because,              unlike the 
masses, he is not an              outsider. He is part of the           
   inner sovereign cadre referenced by the word "of." The              
Constitution is "of" the ruling              elite, but is "for" the 
masses.              In effect the Constitution is a              
schizophrenic document. There are two              
Constitutions; one for the serving              masses, and one for the 
served oligarchs ruling from within the legally sacrosanct              
District of Columbia. This is              why the Preamble contains two
              different terms: the "United            
  States" (denoting the oligarchy              and their authority), and
              "United States of America"              (denoting the 
non-sovereign              masses on the receiving end).
If the Presidential Oath read as follows, there would be less cause for concern:
If the Presidential Oath read as follows, there would be less cause for concern:
I
 do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I            will faithfully execute
 the Office of            President of the United States of            
America, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and 
defend            the Constitution of the United States of            
America. 
 |    
Then
 again, pigs might fly.              Alarmingly, before it was          
    dropped, the President's              original title was "His       
       Excellency."
Many critics and authors have pointed out these disturbing facts and rightly insist that the so-called "United States" is not the same thing as the so-called "United States of America." Nevertheless, due to deliberate misinformation and conditioning, most people do believe the terms refer to one and the same entity. They are certainly not inclined to think of the "United States" (or U.S.) as a foreign corporation. Furthermore, the drafters of the Constitution intentionally saw to it that the term "United States" had more than one meaning. Specifically, they knew the term did not refer to citizens of a state. Once-upon-a-time an American could have been a citizen of a state without being a citizen of the nation. This political idiosyncrasy did not suit the Federalists who ingeniously manipulated the words and terms we are familiar with. It is a old trick that serves the cause of totalitarians everywhere.
Many critics and authors have pointed out these disturbing facts and rightly insist that the so-called "United States" is not the same thing as the so-called "United States of America." Nevertheless, due to deliberate misinformation and conditioning, most people do believe the terms refer to one and the same entity. They are certainly not inclined to think of the "United States" (or U.S.) as a foreign corporation. Furthermore, the drafters of the Constitution intentionally saw to it that the term "United States" had more than one meaning. Specifically, they knew the term did not refer to citizens of a state. Once-upon-a-time an American could have been a citizen of a state without being a citizen of the nation. This political idiosyncrasy did not suit the Federalists who ingeniously manipulated the words and terms we are familiar with. It is a old trick that serves the cause of totalitarians everywhere.
...not only
 were the poly meanings of            "United States" intentionally and 
           expressly used within the Constitution,            but often 
in ways as to actually invite            confusion. For such brilliant 
men to            explain three jurisdictional concepts            
would, on its face, pose a great mystery           -           Kenneth W. Royce (Hologram of            Liberty) 
 |    
When
 members of the police or military            swear to serve, uphold and
 protect the            Constitution and "United States,"            
they probably imagine their oath is            sworn to the American 
people. Nothing            could be further from the truth. They        
    are in fact swearing to give their            labor, and possibly 
their lives,            for the diabolical corporate executives         
   of Washington D.C.
 Oaths of allegiance are fine, as long as you know 
who or what your swearing them to.
who or what your swearing them to.
In short, the U.S. 
and the              U.S.A., are not the same entity.              The 
alleged "People" are not, therefore,              free and sovereign 
members of a              country, as they would have been              
under the Articles of              Confederation drawn up              
after the War of              Independence. No, they were and           
   still are merely employees of a              privately run 
corporation. They              do not have rights, they have            
  provisionally granted privileges. They have liberty,              but 
do not have permanent and              inviolable sovereignty or 
freedom.
The Constitution, as
 currently interpreted, now resembles what the Founding Lawyers truly 
desired in their aristocratic heart of hearts. Two centuries of history 
have lifted the veil from that picture of Dorian Gray, leaving us with 
the Hag of Hegemony - Kenneth W. Royce (Hologram of Liberty) 
The State...both in its genesis and by its primary intention, is purely anti-social. It is not based on the idea of natural rights, but on the idea that the individual has no rights except those that the State may provisionally grant him - Albert Jay Nock (Our Enemy: the State)  |    
| 
 
Hologram of Liberty, by  
K. W. Royce. Probably the best book dealing with the con of the Constitution.  |     
The           
duplicity served to           strengthen Federal power. Because of the  
         Constitution, the populace have been           intentionally 
stripped of their sovereign           rights. It is also because of this
 particular           chicanery that Americans presently find           
themselves politically and economically undermined. The Federalist plan 
was nothing           less than an act of           war. It was the plan
 of agent provocateurs           and fifth columnists. Only a very few  
         authors have stated this in so many words.           However, 
we are convinced that the early Federalists           were ministers of 
the Crown. They           accomplished with their pens what armed       
    legions failed to do by open war.  
We believe that after the Constitution was ratified, Americans became, in effect, subjects of an American-based aristocracy. Their boss, King George, did not resend his physical army to attack with force of arms. He and his advisers knew that America could be conquered and brought under their control by more subtle means:  |    
The phrase "direct 
and immediate allegiance" is something right out of feudal 
law...Americans who became "U.S. citizens" have transposed themselves 
from one system into another fundamentally different from the 
first...Americans have unknowingly joined a modern feudal system in 
which they must render a percentage of their toil to their federal 
master - Kenneth W. Royce (Hologram of Liberty) 
The non-federal state Citizenship became virtually unknown as millions of state Americans were tricked out of their sovereignty and into federal citizenship - and thus into federal jurisdiction. Today, the states have been all but replaced by corporate, federal overlays...There's probably not enough left of the original states for Americans to resume state Citizenship - ibid  |    
These
           facts show that the           Constitution was not a 
progressive document.           On the contrary, its cunning drafters   
        concocted it knowing that it would help to usher in the         
  kind of Merchant State system that           flourished earlier in 
America, before the           War of Independence, and shortly after the
           first settlers arrived, with their           British systems of law. As Albert Jay Nock explains:
The 
fundamental fact to be observed            in any survey of the American
 State's            initial development is the one whose            
importance was first remarked, I            believe, by Mr. Beard; that 
the            trading-company - the commercial            corporation 
for colonization - was            actually an autonomous State. "Like 
the            State," says Mr. Beard, "it had a            
constitution, a charter issued by the            Crown...it had a 
territorial basis, a            grant of land often greater in area than
            a score of European            principalities...every 
essential element            long afterward found in the government     
       of the American State appeared in the            chartered 
corporation that started            English civilization in America" - (Our            Enemy: the State) 
 |    
Nock
           goes on to emphasize the connections between           the 
"Old World" system of control and           so-called "New World" 
system:
...the system of civil order established in America was the State-system of the "mother countries"...the 
only thing that distinguished it was that the exploited and dependent class was situated at an unusual distance from the owning and exploiting class. The headquarters of the autonomous State were on one side of the Atlantic, and its subjects on the other.  |    
The           elites 
of Britain and Europe knew that           remote control was only 
feasible for a short           time. They knew they had to have their   
        agents on site in order for the engines of           
exploitation to work efficiently.           Consequently, in 1628, 
during the reign of           Charles I, the oligarchs established the  
         Massachusetts Bay Company in America. Many           of the 
Constitution's most illustrious           signers became wealthy from 
their memberships           of           corporations such as the 
Massachusetts Bay           Company which overflowed           with 
agents of the British Crown. Business            the American way is, it
 seems, business the          British way.
While it is not surprising that America's Founding Fathers were mostly slave owners, a legal activity,  
it may be surprising to discover that they were often smugglers as well. Profits from drug running, smuggling, slave trading, and even piracy are directly responsible for the founding of several of the country's most important banks, which are still in operation today. New England's staunch insurance business was born and prospered through profits earned from insuring opium and slave ships. The large railroad system that was built throughout the continental United States in the nineteenth century was funded with profits from illegal drug smuggling. And one of the greatest opium fortunes would provide seed money for the telephone and communications industry - Steven Sora (Secret Societies of America's Elite)  |    
Left: The flag of the British East India              Company. Right: The Flag of the "United States" 
Corporation. Red, White and Blue are known as the Colors of the King. Does this
mean that the "States" are in fact "Estates" of the Crown?
Corporation. Red, White and Blue are known as the Colors of the King. Does this
mean that the "States" are in fact "Estates" of the Crown?
Of           course 
there were clever men who knew what           was going on. Even before 
the Constitution -           the document of servitude - was signed and 
          ratified, the warnings went out:
That investigation into the nature and construction of the new constitution, which the conspirators  
have so long and zealously struggled against, has, notwithstanding their partial success, so far taken place as to ascertain the enormity of their criminality. That system which was pompously displayed as the perfection of government, proves upon examination to be the most odious system of tyranny that was ever projected, a many headed hydra of despotism, whose complicated and various evils would be infinitely more oppressive and afflictive than the scourge of any tyrant - "Centinel" (Essay 12, 23 January 1788)  |    
| 
 
The
 Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union was America's true 
constitution before it was unnecessarily derided and overruled by 
cunning self-serving traitors desperate to create an American monarchy in disguise. Today these men would be referred to as Globalists or Internationalists. 
 |     
The
           anonymous author of this diatribe would not           be in 
the least surprised to see the           present state of decay, and 
neither would           Thomas Paine, Patrick Henry, Thomas           
Jefferson or Andrew Jackson. They would           simply realize that 
their worst fears were           justified. 
As we said, the rise of imperialism in America is the result of the "door" being deliberately left ajar, so to speak. The enemies of America were able to creep in whenever they chose. And creep in they did, confident the country would eventually fall into their unworthy hands. They knew their agents were ensconced within the country to misuse their positions of authority within government and big business to gradually undermine the Articles of Confederation that guaranteed each and every American the rights they deserved. They knew they simply had to continue employing the "divide and rule" tactic to further globalist interests. During his reign King George III adamantly proclaimed his utter hatred for the American rebels and American experiment. He openly declared "eternal" war on America, and his word was law to his many loyal and industrious lieutenants. True to form, agents of the British Crown have been waging eternal war on the country ever since the day of their lunatic master.  |    
The men who 
undermined the              Articles of the Confederation              
and hustled the              Constitution have had statues              
and portraits raised in their              honor. Volumes have been 
written              about their deeds, but rarely              has the 
truth been told, except in alternative circles. Throughout America and  
            the world the traitors are              lauded as           
   great revolutionaries, reformers and humanitarians. Their            
  ideological descendants openly and unashamedly work              hand 
in hand with British and              European oligarchs, using fear and
 panic to further              their agendas. They continue to erode 
whatever is left of the              privileges once bestowed upon their
              slaves.
We have 
"federal               sheriffs" beyond               imagination. There
 are forty               six civilian agencies of the               
Federal Government whose               agents carry guns and have       
        the power to make arrests.               These "great insults on
 the               people" have been allowed               because there
 is little we               can do about them, short of               
armed rebellion. And by the               way, no laws authorizing      
         "civil forfeiture" or other               related measures of 
tyranny               have been struck down by the               federal
 courts - Kenneth               W. Royce (Hologram of               Liberty) 
We have plenty of rights in this country, provided you don't get caught exercising them - Terry Mitchell (Editor of The Revolutionary Toker)  |    
Patrick Henry was one
 patriot who understood           what was going on. He did not attend 
the           Convention in Philadelphia, and said: "I           smell a
 rat." He was dead right. But there           was more than one stinking
 human rat loose           at the Convention. The 
traitors referred to           themselves as "Federalists" because they 
knew           the people would think of them as           servants of 
America. And they were right.           Their smokescreen worked 
wonderfully. Today           the misuse of words and terms continues.   
        George Bush's "Patriot Acts" dupe the uninformed masses and give
 them the           impression it is patriotic to give up           hard
 won rights in turn for           government protection.
For centuries, 
pillage by invading armies was a normal part of warfare…Nowadays, at 
least in more civilized countries, we do not let armies rampage for 
booty. We leave the pillaging to men in suits,  
and we don’t call it pillaging anymore. We call it economic development - Brian Whitaker (The Guardian)  |    
The           Bushes 
          did as their predecessors had done two hundred           years
 ago. The Federalist traitors hurried           the ratification process
 along and gave the           Convention delegates and American people  
         little time to scrutinize the Constitution's articles.         
  George W. Bush           did likewise when it came to his scurrilous  
         Patriot Acts. Moreover, he personally saw to           it that 
the investigations into the causes of           the September Eleventh 
tragedy were hampered           and limited:
President 
Bush personally asked            Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle…to  
          limit the Congressional investigation            into the 
events of September 11,            Congressional and White House sources
            told CNN…The request was made at a            private 
meeting with Congressional            leaders - Gore Vidal (Dreaming            War) 
 |    
George
 W. Bush's lack of regard for the Constitution is not unique. As a 
Globalist he does not serve America or the interests of American people.
 He is one of many men who have used the Constitution as a stepping 
stone toward what might be described as an world super state. Nowadays 
the conspirators who labor toward this utopian wet-dream appear to be 
less inclined to conceal the reasons for their intrigue. As George W. 
Bush himself put it:
It
 is the sacred principles enshrined in the United Nations Charter to 
which the American people will henceforth pledge their allegiance - (Address to the UN General Assembly, February 1 1992) 
The world can therefore seize the opportunity (the Persian Gulf crisis) to fulfill the long held promise of a New World Order where diverse nations are drawn together in common cause to achieve the universal aspirations of mankind - (State of the Union Address, January 29 1991)  |    
Author Forrest 
MacDonald clarified the issue           concerning the undermining of 
the Articles           of Confederation. In his book entitled           Alexander Hamilton: A Biography,           he wrote:
What did determine 
the outcome were the rules of the contest, which Hamilton played an 
important part in formulating. The convention decided to disregard the 
amendment procedures prescribed in the Articles of Confederation and 
instead provided that each state should hold a special election for 
delegates to a ratifying convention...Had the rules of the Articles of 
Confederation been adhered to, the Constitution would never have been 
adopted. 
 |    
The           
dissenters knew what lay in store and were worried. Their warnings went 
          largely unheard and the ratification of the           
Constitution hurriedly commenced regardless           of the warnings of
 perceptive           critics:
It is insisted, 
indeed, that this constitution must be received, be it ever so 
imperfect. But remember, when the people once part with power, they can 
seldom or never resume it again by by force. Many instances can be 
produced in which the people have voluntarily increased the powers of 
their rulers; but few, if any, in which rulers have willingly abridged 
their authority - "Brutus" (Essay 1, 18 October 1787) 
Consider what you are about to do before your part with this Government. Take longer time in reckoning things: Revolutions like this have happened in almost every country in Europe: Similar examples are...ancient Greece and ancient Rome: Instances of the people losing their liberty by their own carelessness and the ambition of a few - Patrick Henry (Speech of 5 June 1778) Does it not insult your judgment to tell you, Adopt first, and then amend?...Is your rage for novelty so great, that you are first to sign and seal, and then retract?...agree to bind yourself hand and foot - for the sake of what? of being unbound?...to go into a dungeon - for what? To get out? Is there no danger, when you go in, that the bolts of federal authority shall shut you in? - Patrick Henry (Speech to the Virginia ratifying assembly 1788) I look upon the Constitution as the most fatal plan that could possibly be conceived to enslave a free people - ibid  |    
No
           sooner was the Constitution ratified than           the 
oligarchs began acting tyrannically           toward the American 
people. British           agent President George Washington - who       
    presided over the signing of the           Constitution and who was a
 member of the           Ohio Company of Virginia, the Mississippi      
     Company, and the Potomac Company - sent           thirteen thousand
 armed troops to violently           stamp out the so-called Whiskey 
Rebellion of           1794. This rebellion was against heavy           
taxation. 
The victims of government oppression soon discovered they could not use the Constitution to receive justice. It contained little provision for the underclasses. It gave complete suzerainty to the courts and judges, not to the people or states. To all intents and purposes it was as if the War of Independence had never been fought.
The Constitution merely made it possible for agents of the British Crown to operate as if they served the citizens of America. In this regard, nothing has changed.
The victims of government oppression soon discovered they could not use the Constitution to receive justice. It contained little provision for the underclasses. It gave complete suzerainty to the courts and judges, not to the people or states. To all intents and purposes it was as if the War of Independence had never been fought.
The Constitution merely made it possible for agents of the British Crown to operate as if they served the citizens of America. In this regard, nothing has changed.
The facts 
about the American Revolution            show that in the early days, in
 the mid            1770's, the colonialists suffered a            
series of defeats. Strategic secrets            were being passed to the
 British. The            facts also show that an American army          
  general, Benedict Arnold, was a traitor            who plotted to 
surrender the fort at            West Point to the British and turn the 
           tide of war against his own side. The            facts link 
Washington with Arnold when            it comes to Freemasonry and the 
facts            show that the day the plot was            discovered, 
Washington was due to meet            Arnold at West Point...Washington 
has            been working with Arnold and passing            secrets 
to the British            - Robert Cooper (Interview on Dan            Brown's The Lost Symbol)  
 |    
The
 tyranny continued in 1798 with the Alien and Sedition Acts. These Acts 
made criticism of federal officials a punishable offense. The 
Constitution served to strengthen the powers of the wealthy aristocratic
 class in America. It possessed few benefits for the average citizen and
 ultimately legalized widespread acts of confiscation and extortion. As 
Thomas Jefferson once remarked: "The natural progress of things is for 
liberty to yield and government to gain ground." The point is emphasized
 by Constitutional scholar and author Kenneth W. Royce:
If analyzed in contrast to history since 1787, it appears that the Constitution was purposely laden  
with several components designed to nearly guarantee the gradual expansion of the Federal Government - at the expense of the States and the people - (Hologram of Liberty)  |    
The Founding Fathers 
may have              referred to themselves as              
Federalists. But this was, as we              said, yet              one
 more cunning play on words.              Master propagandists such as 
Vladimir Lenin probably learned              tactics from America's     
         faux Federalists.
| 
 
Patrick
 Henry is known for his              "Give me Liberty or give me        
      Death!" speech. Along with              Samuel Adams and Thomas 
Paine,              he is remembered as one of the              most 
influential and radical              advocates of the American          
    Revolution and of Republicanism,              especially in his 
denunciations              of corruption of government              
officials - (Wikipedia Online              Encyclopedia) 
 |     
The original
              Federalists demanded a              government of limited 
powers              and were for State power. Their              needs 
were ably              met by the Articles of              Confederation
 ratified in 1781.             After the War of Independence            
  (1775 to 1783),             Americans had the Constitution            
  forced upon them. Ever since              then Americans have been 
duped              about the prestige of the              document. The 
people and              representatives of the original thirteen        
      states were not allowed enough              time to decide whether
 the              document was sound or not.              Patrick Henry 
questioned the              haste and warned of the              
consequences of accepting the              Constitution              
without due consideration and              debate. He knew that State   
           representatives needed at least              a year to mull 
over the articles              of the Constitution. He spoke            
  out and said: 
 
As we said, the 
Constitution's articles scandalously allowed           the Supreme Court
 to possess almost           unlimited legal powers: 
  |    
Despite widespread 
resistance and a spirit of           animosity toward the Constitution's
           articles, its cheerleaders Madison,           Hamilton, 
Franklin and Washington           relentlessly pressed           on. 
They ensured that resistance to their           will was summarily 
suppressed.
Most troublesome to 
the framers of the Constitution was the increasing insurgent spirit 
evidenced among the people. Fearing the popular takeover of state 
governments, the wealthy class looked to a national government as a 
means of protecting their interests. Even in states where they were 
inclined to avoid strong federation, the rich, once faced with the 
threat of popular rule and realizing that a political alliance with 
conservatives from other states would be a safeguard if the radicals 
could capture the state government...gave up 'state rights' for 
'nationalism' without hesitation -  Michael Parenti (Democracy for the Few) 
Within a month after the 17 September signing, a torrent of anti-constitution essays appeared in the newspapers, pleasing for prudent wisdom. This horrified three particular federalists, who quickly went on the editorial offensive in what was to be a staggering 85 essays totaling some 175,000 words. The Federalist Papers were written by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay to defend the proposed Constitution...Hamilton, Madison, and Jay hid for years behind the pseudonym "Publius"...to conceal from the public their true identities, and Convention attendance - Kenneth W. Royce (Hologram of Liberty)  |    
George
 Washington addressing the              delegates during the signing of 
             the US Constitution. Benjamin              Franklin (a 
member of the               English Hell Fire Club) is shown in the 
center              of the canvas. His design for              the Seal 
of the United States              depicted Moses leading the            
  Children of Israel across the              Red Sea. Franklin's 
nickname              among his elite secret society              chums 
was "Moses." Like his many              Masonic associates in America,  
             England and France, he was an Atonist               or in 
conventional               parlance a Luciferian. His backers 
were              powerful royal figures such as              Charles de
 Lorraine and the Duke              d'Orleans. The last thing on his    
          mind was freedom for the              American people. He was a
              wealthy speculator in land, and a member of the Vandalia              Company,
 whose land grant              happened (coincidentally of              
course) to have been awarded by              the British Crown. 
 |     
The          
secretiveness of the proceedings at the          Convention reinforced 
the suspicions of many critics of the          Constitution. Kenneth W. 
Royce tell us:
Little 
wonder why the Constitution operated           under such extraordinary 
secrecy. Held on           the second floor, windows shut, with         
  sentries posted below, the delegates were           sworn to strict 
silence. Not until 32 years           later (a generation, you see) were
 the           proceeding's Journals published. Madison's           
notes (thoroughly edited) weren't published           until 53 years 
later, in 1840.   
 |    
Royce          also 
comments on the measures taken by the          Federalists to conceal   
       the infighting that took place among delegates          at the 
Convention:
Great propaganda measures were employed to conceal the Convention's true atmosphere of acrimonious dissent. 
 |    
The state of         affairs was noted by a journalist, who wrote:
         So
 great is the unanimity, we          hear, that prevails in the 
Convention, upon all          great federal subjects, that it has been  
        proposed to call the room in which they assemble          - 
Unanimity Hall - (Pennsylvania          Packet and Daily Advertiser, 19 July 1787) 
 |    
Fifty five delegates 
        attended the Philadelphia         Convention - forty one 
politicians and         thirty four lawyers. Not a single person from 
the         working class was present. Those men who attempted to       
  delay proceedings by boycotting the Convention were         sought out
 by troops and forcibly dragged to the         Convention hall.
Electing the 
respected General George Washington as Convention president, with the 
added presence of Benjamin Franklin, was responsible for much of the 
public's "false confidences." Of the 55 delegates, 41 were politicians 
and 34 were lawyers...According to delegate James McHenry, at least 21 
of the 55 delegates favored some form of monarchy - Kenneth W. Royce (Hologram of Liberty) 
…in 1782 (Washington) received a letter from Colonel Lewis Nicola urging him to use the army to make himself King. He rejected the proposal with great indignation. Washington, it seems felt that America would eventually become a monarchy; indeed, he admitted the necessity of the principle of monarchy. But it seems he could not reconcile this view with his Templar philosophy, which demanded a republic - Nicholas Hagger (The Secret History of the West)  |    
Prime mover in the conspiracy to undermine the Articles of Confederation was the traitor Alexander Hamilton. In The Federalist Papers, Douglas Adair comments on Hamilton's dilemma:
Hamilton's 
disillusion with the workings of the          Confederation and his fear
 of democracy,          especially after Shay's Rebellion, had convinced
          him that it would be almost impossible to set up          a 
stable republic in a country as large as the          United States. As 
he informed the Convention,          any society in which political 
power was vested          in the hands of all the people would be       
   continually torn by the class struggles of the          rich and 
poor. Hamilton's remedy for this class          war the Hobbesian 
expedient of setting up a          leviathan state to impose order upon 
the          American People from above, Hamilton was sure          that
 the only alternative to social anarchy was          the establishment 
of a consolidated government          capable of maintaining itself 
independently of          the people's will. 
 |    
Hamilton's         
tactics worked. He knew the mindset of the men he         represented. 
He knew all he had to do was         instill enough fear into the 
delegates to achieve         the desired result. Federalists and 
Globalists         continue to employ this ruse to further         
agendas. It is little more than conflict control.
That was the genius 
of the Constitution: To 1. utterly transform political reality without 
the people understanding it; 2. destroy the States without sound or 
smoke and 3. foist a government destined to become, over the distant 
horizon, fully national in scope and authority. By the time the States 
and the people would realize they'd been trumped, it would be too late  - Kenneth W. Royce (Hologram of Liberty) 
 |    
Hamilton, Madison and
 their Federalist gang of conspirators were ecstatic over the success of
 their "divide and rule" tactics. After the damage was done Madison 
bragged about the debacle he had deliberately helped foment:
One anti-federalist 
opinion tell us that the proposed constitution ought to be rejected 
because it is not a confederation of the States, but a government over 
individuals. Another admits that it ought to be a government over 
individuals to a certain extent but by no means to extent proposed. A 
third does not object to a government over individuals but to the want 
of a bill of rights. A fourth concurs in the absolute necessity of a 
bill of rights but contends that it ought to be declaratory, not for the
 personal rights of individuals, but of the rights reserved to the 
States in their political capacity. A fifth is of the opinion that a 
bill of rights of any sort would be superfluous and misplaced and that 
the plan would be unexceptional except for the fatal power of regulating
 the times and place of elections. 
 |    
Thomas         
Jefferson (principle author of the Declaration         of Independence) 
was appalled at the liberties taken by         Hamilton and those he 
continued taking in the years following the Constitution's         
ratification. He noticed Hamilton was         contemptuous of the 
Constitution he himself cheerled, and as ambitiously attempting to 
obtain broader powers         for central government. Hamilton soon 
proposed         changes well outside the scope of the         
Constitution's precepts. Obviously, the Constitution was merely         
one means to many ends for Hamilton and his         self-serving 
aristocratic cronies. Incensed by         Hamilton's scheming Jefferson 
wrote:
I          
will not suffer...the slanders of Hamilton whose          history, from 
the moment at which history can          stoop to notice him, is a 
tissue of machinations          against the liberty of the country which
 has not          only received and given him bread, but heaped         
 honors on his head - (Jefferson to          Washington, 1792) 
 |    
Eventually         
even Hamilton's colleague James Madison began to         chafe at his 
obvious disdain for the people and         Constitutional provisos:
         As
          Madison watched Hamilton's program develop, he          became
 disillusioned and bitter. In the          Convention he had fought to 
create a          Constitution under which 'the interests and          
rights of every class of citizen should be duly          represented and
 understood.' Now he saw the          machinery of his new government 
being used to          exploit the mass of the people in the interest   
       of a small minority -           Douglas Adair (The          Federalist Papers) 
 |    
Among         
Hamilton's most insidious programs was the creation         of the first
 private bank. He pushed for the         establishment of this 
scurrilously extortionist         organization. His co-conspirator, 
arch-traitor Robert Morris, was undoubtedly an         agent of European
 aristocracy.
Financial 
genius Robert           Morris organized the first bank. He and his     
      associates believed that the bank should be           modeled 
after the Bank of England…Secret           investors put up $400,000 to 
start this           bank. This attempt failed after two short          
 years…Secretary of the Treasury Alexander           Hamilton, submitted
 a proposal to Congress           in 1790 for a central bank. 
Interestingly           enough, Hamilton had been an aide of Robert     
      Morris in the initial experience of central           banking in 
North America           - Bill Hughes (The Secret           Terrorists) 
 |    
Arch-traitor
  Aaron Burr. Relatively unknown to most         Americans, Burr was a  
prime mover within the cabal         that worked to undermine American  
sovereignty. This         truly insidious character's plotting is  
revealed in         Anton Chaitkin's masterly work Treason         in America. 
 |    
Norman
 Dodd,                 Research Director of the 1950s Reese         
Commission - which investigated America's tax-exempt         foundations
 - finally uncovered the dirt on Morris:
Robert Morris 
(signer of the Declaration of Independence) was the personality in this 
country who used his fortune to finance the Continental army and at the 
end of the revolution, Mr. Morris found himself diluted of his fortune. 
So after the revolution was over he then turned his attention to, as an 
individual, of rebuilding a fortune and his area of activity was in land
 speculation. At that time he was contacted by an agent of wealth lodged
 abroad and this wealth was represented by an entity which is 
historically referred to as the “House of Orange.” However, we did know 
the agent of the House of Orange who contacted Robert Morris after he 
began to rebuild his fortune, and that personality was a man by the name
 of Haym Saloman, and he was an agent of the House of Orange in this 
country, and it was through him that Mr. Morris was offered considerable
 financial accommodation, which would enable him to, working capital, 
you might say, to rebuild his fortune. 
 |    
Haym Soloman was, of 
course, a         servant of the Jewish Kahal and Jesuit         Order. 
Like the Rothschilds who rose to power         shortly after his time,  
       Solomon         was a lackey of European royalty - the 
Hanoverians,         Hapsburgs, Stuarts, and related houses. King       
  George III (America's arch-enemy) was a senior         member of the 
Dutch House of Orange or Hanover.
| 
 
The
 royals maintain control over their disposable lieutenants by way of 
Masonic societies such as the Skull and Bones and Bohemian Club. The 
double-headed eagle (emblem of Scottish Rite Masonry) is  identical to the royal arms of European dynasties such as the Hapsburgs. 
 |     
These royal dynasties
 own         corporations and businesses all over the world and         
have the power and skill to purchase and use men as easily as they do 
companies.         Of course they do not openly display their         
colors. They are         discreet and prefer to exercise control by way 
        of devious but         disposable agents, faceless companies and
 shadowy         banking houses. One of the most important         
aristocratically controlled engines is the                 Société      
   Générale de Belgique (Society         General of Belgium). From      
           1840 to 1870 (before the Rothschilds         were handed the 
wheel), this financial consortium was directly         controlled by 
Belgium's King Leopold II, grandson of         Queen Victoria and member
 of the powerful         Saxe-Coburg-Gotha dynasty.         The Society 
was         founded in 1822, by none other than King         William I 
of the House of Orange. America's number         one enemy, King George 
III, was of the same royal         line as William I. Their ancestor, 
Duchess Sophia of         Hanover was heir to the English throne.       
  Her son became George I of Great Britain. His         grandson was 
infamous King George III. These         monarchs were members of the 
so-called "Black         Nobility" of Venice and Holland. By way of 
their         financial consortiums they and their relatives maintained 
control remotely over colonies that         included America. 
 |    
The corporate name 
that is assigned to that entity, as the 18th turned into the 19th 
century, is called Societie Genearale de Belgique, which is the largest 
accumulation of privately controlled tangible 
wealth in the world - Andrew Power (Ireland: Land of the Pharaohs) William of Orange it was...who established the original SGDB which was to finance the growth of a great part of Belgian industry and which today remains by far the most important single force in the country’s economic life. La Generale list the Belgian royal family as well as the Vatican among its shareholders in addition to that all-powerful family alliance behind Belgian finances – the Solvays, the Boels and the Janssens…In 1838 the rival Banque de Belgique succumbed to the general crisis in Europe and closed its doors but the SGDB, supported by the Rothschilds, remained open, paying out coin against the notes issued by its competitor - ibid Prince Bernhard is known to be an influential member of the SGDB, a mysterious organization that seems to be an association of large corporate interests from many countries. American firms associated with this society are said to be among the large corporations whose officers are members of the Council on Foreign Relations and related organizations - Dan Smoot (The Invisible Government)  |    
Because of the       
  intervention of men such as Thomas Jefferson and         Andrew 
Jackson, the         Federalist program to socially and economically    
    undermine America temporarily         failed. But time was on the 
side of the         conspiring Nationalists. The second Federal Bank was
 established six years later, in 1816. President         Monroe 
appointed Jesuit agent Nicholas Biddle as         its first president.
Nicholas Biddle, 
another one of their agents, carried out phase two of the Jesuit attack.
 Biddle was a brilliant financier, having graduated from the University 
of Pennsylvania at the age of thirteen. He was 
a master of the science of money. By the time that Jackson had come to the Presidency in 1828, Biddle was in full control of the Federal government’s central bank. This was not the first time that a central bank had been established. Twice before, first under Robert Morris, and then under Alexander Hamilton, had a central bank been tried, but in both cases it had failed because of fraudulent actions on the part of the bankers who were in control. After the war of 1812, a central bank was tried again, and it was in this third attempt that we find Mr. Biddle - Bill Hughes (The Secret Terrorists)  |    
The          
scandalous intrigue of affluent, influential          Jewish financier 
families, such as Rothschild,          Oppenheimer, Lazard, Warburg, 
Schiff, Kuhn,          Loeb, Goldman, Sachs, and so on, has been        
  tracked and delineated by several authors.  
Under the surface, 
the Rothschilds long had a powerful influence in dictating American 
financial laws. The law records show that they were powers in the old 
Bank of the United States -  Gustavus Meyers (History of the Great American Fortunes) 
 |    
The evidence clearly 
shows these         families were no friends of America. The Rothschilds
 in particular received prestigious awards         from America's 
deadliest enemies. For services         rendered leading members of the 
Rothschild family have been         endowed with elite status by royals 
        and popes. Amschel Mayer Rothschild, for example, was a         
Knight of Malta.
The Holy Roman 
Emperors from the House of Habsburg kept a considerable number of court 
Jews. Among those of Emperor Ferdinand II are mentioned the following: 
Solomon and Ber Mayer...Joseph Pincherle of Görz; Moses and Joseph 
Marburger (Morpurgo) of Gradisca; Ventura Pariente of Trieste;  
the physician Elijah Chalfon of Vienna; Samuel zum Drachen, Samuel zum Straussen, and Samuel zum Weissen Drachen of Frankfort-on-the-Main; and Mordecai Meisel, of Prague. A specially favored court Jew was Jacob Bassevi, the first Jew to be ennobled, with the title "von Treuenberg" - (Wikipedia Online Encyclopedia. Entry on Court Jews)  |    
James Madison confessed that "I have for some time...been a pensioner on the favor of Haym Salomon, a Jew broker" - ibid 
Solomon supposedly wrote the first draft of the United States Constitution according to some historians. Some claim that he designed the Great Seal of the United States, which is why it has what some believe resembles a Jewish Star above the eagle's head design, and it is also on the back of every American one dollar bill. He believed the United States would become a world power - (Hyam Solomon Bio, indopedia.org website) The blunt reality is that the Rothschild banking dynasty in Europe was the dominant force, both financially and politically, in the formation of the Bank of the United States - G. Edward Griffin (The Creature from Jekyll Island) The Rothschilds were Jesuits who used their Jewish background as a façade to cover their sinister activities. The Jesuits, working through Rothschild and Biddle, sought to gain control of the banking system of the United States - Bill Hughes (The Secret Terrorists) Over the years since N. M. Rothschild...had been, for a time, the official European banker for the U.S., government and was a pledged supporter of the Bank of the United States - Derek Wilson (Rothschild: The Wealth and Power of a Dynasty) He was lord and master of the money-market of the world, and of course virtually lord and master of everything else…He literally held the revenues of Southern Italy in pawn, and monarchs and ministers of all countries courted his advice and were guided by his suggestions - Benjamin Disraeli (Prime Minister of England writing on Lord Rothschild) Aware that the Rothschilds are an important Jewish family, I looked them up in Encyclopedia Judaica and discovered that they bear the title “Guardians of the Vatican Treasury”…The appointment of Rothschild gave the black papacy absolute financial power and secrecy. Who would ever search a family of orthodox Jews for the key to the wealth of the Roman Catholic Church? - F. Tupper Saussy (Rulers of Evil)  |    
The Hofjuden (Court Jews)
 
Amschel Mayer Rothschild fathered five sons who jointly formed one of the most powerful banking families in history. Amschel died in 1812, which means he may have actively conspired with the Federalists who attempted to found the first US federal bank in 1791. By 1789, Amschel was assisting the House of Hesse and British Crown with their attempts to undermine Napoleon.  |     
Mayer Amschel Rothschild took over the reigns from his father. He was a Knight of Malta. Elite Masonic Jews have long worked as money men and advisers to Turks, Huns, and Church of Rome. Mayer died in 1855, which means he was in a position to involve himself in the conspiracy to open the second US Federal bank.
Nathan Mayer Rothschild was in charge of the London branch of his family's banking cartel. He was already working in the Stock Exchange from 1804. He established his London bank in 1811. He died in 1836. Of course, long before Nathan's time, Jewish financiers had been active in England. For example, during the Civil War (1642–1651), Manasseh Ben Israel, funded the tyrant Oliver Cromwell. Cromwell personally overturned the legislation banning Jews from England. (Here for more.)
James
 Mayer Rothschild was adviser to two French kings. Highly decorated, he 
and his four brothers were bestowed the hereditary title of Baron by 
Austria's Francis II (the Holy Roman Emperor). James was also appointed 
consul-general of the Austrian Empire and, in 1823, he was awarded the 
French Legion of Honor. The predecessors of the Rothschilds were the 
Hahn family. The Rothschilds are related to the Bauers, Oppenheimers, 
Warburgs and Schiffs. These Khazarian crime-families were able 
lieutenants of royalty, not the architects of control, as many 
misinformed authors believe. They exercise enormous influence over the 
American government by way of Masonic lodges and Federal orgs such as 
the Federal Reserve Banks.
The facts         show that traitorous Nationalists (or         should we say Internationalists),
         such as Hamilton, Morris, Solomon, Burr and Biddle         did 
not have the best interests of ordinary         Americans at heart. On 
the contrary, by way of their         Constitution, and later by way of 
their banks and         credit houses, they sought to subjugate and     
    impoverish the citizens of America. In his excellent         books The Secret Terrorists and         Enemy Unmasked,
 Bill Hughes details the         strong-arm methods used by Biddle to 
force wary         President Andrew Jackson into commissioning the      
   founding of the Federal Bank:
Biddle responded to 
Jackson refusing to allow him to re-establish the central bank by 
shrinking the nation’s money supply. He did this by refusing to make 
loans. By so doing, he upended the economy and money disappeared. 
Unemployment ran high. Companies  went bankrupt because they could not 
pay their loans…So confident was he that he publicly boasted that he had
 caused the economic wars in America. 
Is there no danger to our liberty and independence in a bank that in its nature has so little to bind it to our country? Is there not cause to tremble for the purity of our elections in peace and for the independence of our country in war? Controlling our currency, receiving our public monies, and holding themselves in dependence, it would be more formidable and dangerous than a naval and military power of the enemy - President Andrew Jackson  |    
Because         
Andrew Jackson persistently resisted the threats and         devices of 
the bankers, he was the victim of an         attempted assassination. 
The gunman was a certain         Richard Lawrence. G. Edward Griffin 
wrote:
…Lawrence...boasted 
to friends that he had been in touch with powerful people in Europe who 
had promised to protect him from punishment should he be caught - (The Creature from Jekyll Island) 
 |    
The Federal bankers 
caused the Depression of 1929, and saw to it that thousands of American 
businesses were ruined. They funded Adolf Hitler, and financed Lenin's 
murderous Bolsheviks. Avaricious financial organizations that plague the
 planet, such as the World Bank and IMF (International Monetary Fund), 
are merely tentacles of the Federal System.
           
       Immense sums belonging to our          national depositors have 
been given to Germany          on no collateral security 
whatsoever…Billions          upon billions of our money has been pumped 
into          Germany by the Federal Reserve Board and the          
Federal Reserve Banks -                   H. S. Kenan (The Federal          Reserve Bank) 
 |    
Sir Joseph         
Stamp was director of the Bank of England from 1928         to 1941. He 
openly addressed the colossal power of         the Bankers:
           
       The          modern banking system manufactures money out of     
     nothing. The process is perhaps the most          astounding piece 
of sleight of hand that was          ever invented.                  
Banking          was conceived in iniquity and born in sin.             
              Bankers          own the Earth. Take it away from them, 
but leave          them the power to create money, and with the         
 flick of a pen they will create enough money to          buy it back 
again...Take          this great power away from them and all great     
     fortunes like mine will disappear, and they          ought to 
disappear, for then this would be a          better and happier world to
 live in.                           But if          you want to continue
 to be slaves of the banks          and pay the cost of your own 
slavery, then let          the bankers continue to create money and 
control          credit. 
 |    
President         
Thomas Jefferson was not a Freemason, and not         the least bit 
interested in amassing personal wealth.         He had no love for the 
Federal bank and made his         position clear:
A private central 
bank issuing the public currency is a greater menace to the liberties of
 the people than a standing army...We must not let our rulers load us 
with perpetual debt. 
I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around the banks will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered.  |    
Nevertheless 
Jefferson's         reputation is marred on several accounts,         
not least by his appointment of British agent Albert         Gallatin as
 Secretary of the Treasury in 1801.         In the same year Gallatin 
was also appointed Vice         President. Regrettably, a statue of the 
duplicitous Geneva-born         Gallatin stands to this day outside the 
United         States Treasury building in Washington DC.
It is interesting and suggestive to note that Alexander Hamilton's banking system precisely paralleled that used by British bankers. He favored what is known as the tontine capitalist system:
It is interesting and suggestive to note that Alexander Hamilton's banking system precisely paralleled that used by British bankers. He favored what is known as the tontine capitalist system:
His tontine scheme, 
fashioned after the British tontine of 1789, involved a system of rights
 of annual payments to survivors, the annuities therefrom becoming the 
means of creating a permanent investment class - Frank Bourgin (The Great Challenge: The Myth of Laissez-Faire in the Early Republic) 
 |    
Political         
figures of intelligence and cunning knew the real         reason for the
 War of Independence. They knew it had         to do with money and 
usury, and with nationwide         colonization, confiscation, and 
extortion. They knew         the conflict was fomented by British and 
European         banks, eager to establish control over America, as     
    they had throughout the world. This fact is admitted         by 
British agent Benjamin Franklin whose comment         takes us to the 
heart of the matter:
The inability of the Colonists to get power to issue their own money permanently out of the hands of  
King George III and the international bankers, was the prime reason for the revolutionary war  |    
The         Colonists
 were not able to free themselves from the         clutches of the 
international bankers and royal         overlords. The War of 
Independence was not a victory         for the citizens of America. On 
the contrary, it was         yet one more victory for the aristocracy 
that has         controlled America from the beginning.
As with the real 
first bank, the government had been the only depositor to put up any 
real money, with the remainder being raised from loans the investors 
made to each other, using the magic of fractional reserve banking. When 
time came for renewal of the charter, the bankers were warning of bad 
times ahead if they didn't get what they wanted. The charter was not 
renewed. Five month later Britain had attacked America and started the 
war of 1812 - (Money as History) 
Few people are aware today that the history of the United States, since the Revolution in 1776, has been, in large part, the story of an epic struggle to get free, and stay free, of control by the European international banks. This struggle was finally lost in 1913, when President Woodrow Wilson signed the into effect the Federal Reserve Act, putting the International Banking Cartel in charge of creating America's money - Paul Grignon (Money as Debt)  |    
Thomas         Jefferson mentioned the nefarious power of the         bankers directly, saying desperately:
I wish it 
were possible to obtain a single          amendment to our Constitution -
 taking from the          federal government their power of borrowing. 
 |    
After         
Alexander Hamilton's gang had established the Federal Bank, and         
the Judiciary with its unlimited power,         Jefferson's illusions 
concerning America's fate were         gone. In 1821, five years        
 before he died, he recorded his misgivings and         foreboding:
It has long...been 
my opinion...that the germ of dissolution of our federal judiciary is in
 the constitution of the federal judiciary; an irresponsible body 
working like gravity by night and by day, gaining a little today and a 
little tomorrow, and advancing its noiseless step like a thief over the 
field of jurisdiction, until all shall be usurped from the states, and 
the government of all be consolidated into one. To this I am opposed, 
because when all government...shall be drawn to Washington as the center
 of all power, it will render powerless the checks provided of one 
government on another, and will become as venal and oppressive as the 
government from which we separated. 
Our government is now taking so steady a course as to show by what road it will pass to destruction, to wit, by consolidation first, and then corruption, its necessary consequences.  |    
The following year Jefferson's insight sharpened all         the more. His words reveal the accuracy of his         foresight:
If ever this vast country is brought under a single government, it will be one of the most extensive corruption... 
 |    
In
 fact         Jefferson had misgivings about the state of affairs       
  in America many years before he wrote these words.          Between 
1784 and 1789 he had been living in France as minister to that         
country. Upon his         return to America he was horrified to see how 
        little effect the grand precepts and provisos of the         
Declaration of Independence, which he had chiefly         formulated, 
had made. Alfred Jay Knock explains:
On arriving in New 
York and resuming his place in the social life of the country, he was 
greatly depressed by the discovery that the principles of the 
Declaration had gone wholly by the board. No one spoke of natural rights
 and popular sovereignty, it would seem actually that no one had ever 
heard of them. On the contrary, everyone was talking about the pressing 
need of a strong central coercive authority, able to check the 
incursions which the "democratic spirit" was likely to incite upon "the 
men of principle and property"...Clearly, though the Declaration might 
have been the charter of American independence, it was in no sense the 
charter of the new American State -  (Our Enemy: the State) 
 |    
 
Thomas
 Jefferson. Along with William Paterson, Thomas Paine, Patrick Henry and
 Samuel Adams, he put state rights before the demands of insatiable 
tyrannous Federalists. He understood that the Constitution works on a 
state level, but does not work when it is interpreted and implemented on
 the Federal level, by men who can not only force states to submit to 
the Federal will, but who print money to thereby cover up their failures
 and perpetuate their unsustainable policies that would be shot down on 
the state level. 
 |     
Patrick
         Henry, long time critic of the Constitution's         drafters,
 also clearly foresaw the totalitarianism         of the Federalists:
My
 great objection to this Government is, that it does not leave us the 
means of defending our rights; or of waging war against tyrants...Have 
we the means of resisting disciplined armies, when our only defense, the
 militia, is put into the hands of Congress?  - (Speech of 5 June, 1788) 
Did you ever read of any revolution in any nation, brought about by the punishment of those in power, inflicted by those who had no power at all?...Will your Mace-bearer be a match for a disciplined regiment?...Will the oppressor ever let go of the oppressed? Was there ever an instance? Can the annals of mankind exhibit one single example, where rulers, overcharged with power, willingly let go of the oppressed? - ibid A standing army we shall have also, to execute the execrable commands of tyranny - ibid  |    
Alfred          Jay Nock summarizes the travesty and the tragedy          in these words:
Nowhere in the 
history of the constitutional period do we find the faintest suggestion 
of the Declaration's doctrine of natural rights, and we find its 
doctrine of popular sovereignty not only continuing in abeyance, but 
constitutionally estopped from ever reappearing. Nowhere do we find  
a trace of the Declaration's theory of government, on the contrary, we find it expressly repudiated. The new political mechanism was a faithful replica of the old disestablished British model, but so far improved and strengthened as to be incomparably more close-working and efficient...presenting more attractive possibilities of capture and control - (Our Enemy: the State)  |    
Nothing that         
governments do is new. Despots within government         operate 
according to plans that are         repeated in various ways over 
generations. Their         control is aided and abetted by their        
 co-conspirators in the media. The politicians and         media spin 
doctors are instructed by overlords who         control the private 
banks and "philanthropic"         foundations.
Public 
sentiment is everything. With public          sentiment nothing can 
fail. Without it nothing          can succeed. He who molds opinion is 
greater          than he who enacts laws - Abraham Lincoln 
 |    
In many         cases
 the politicians, media men and bankers are themselves         under the
 tutelage and direction of British and         European aristocracy who 
have made the "board," so         to speak, on which the great 
geopolitical games are         played.
The conspirators who organize the geopolitical game are cautious and do not want their true allegiances or diabolical schemes to be publicly exposed. Each group and individual conspirator knows how vulnerable they are. They know the facts about their true allegiances and agendas must never leak out to the masses at large. Their success depends upon human apathy and ignorance.
The conspirators who organize the geopolitical game are cautious and do not want their true allegiances or diabolical schemes to be publicly exposed. Each group and individual conspirator knows how vulnerable they are. They know the facts about their true allegiances and agendas must never leak out to the masses at large. Their success depends upon human apathy and ignorance.
In "Red 
Dusk and the Morrow"...by Sir Paul           Dukes, formerly Chief of 
the British Secret           Service in Russia, we read that a 
Lithuanian           asked a prominent Bolshevik how the regime         
  was maintained. The answer was: "Our power           is based on three
 things: first, on Jewish           brains; secondly, on Lettish and 
Chinese           bayonets; and thirdly, on the crass           
stupidity of the Russian people - Denis           Fahey (The Rulers of Russia) 
 |    
The
 elitist         conspirators also         know that should civil unrest
 occur, the masses can         be forced back into line by threats to 
their         material and emotional security. The strategy is tried and
         true, and usually works wonders. As Ernest Hemingway explained:
The first panacea for a mismanaged nation is inflation of the currency; the second is war. Both bring  
a temporary prosperity and both bring a permanent ruin. But both are the refuge of political and economic opportunists.  |    
The
 Trinity of Slavery. This basic diagram            delineates how 
Atonist royals maintain world control.            By way of theology and
 politics are human hearts and minds enslaved. Through            secret
 societies the            hierarchy of control is perpetuated and       
     monitored. As French poet Charles Peguy            wrote: "Tyranny 
is always better            organized that freedom." 
Because of the confessions and evidence provided by intelligent, informed whistle-blowers from within religion, politics, royalty and masonry, we know a great deal about how the engines of world and mind control operate. However there are pitfalls when insiders with myopic insight and inflexible allegiances and prejudices attempt to instruct the masses as to the intricacies of oligarchic control. When it comes to exposing the dirty little secrets, and dirty big secrets of those occupying the highest levels of the Atonist power-pyramid, objectivity is essential. Photographs of their hideous visages, taken from a rickety platform constructed by their agents, will be “blurred” and inadequate, to say the least.  |     
An
 alternative schemata of the pyramid            of enslavement shows 
that sociopolitical power descends from the            highest unseen 
level to operatives            making up the elusive College of         
   Cardinals situated in Rome and            elsewhere. This level of 
Solar Cult            agents includes the infamous Jesuit            
Order and so-called Illuminati. Next, a            measure of power 
flows down to the level            of the many secret societies that 
plague            the world. Although these denominations            may
 have a Protestant or Catholic,            liberal or conservative 
coloring, they            are all controlled by the same nefarious      
      Luciferian cadre. From here, when            necessary, 
sociopolitical power is            loaned to the world's ardent 
psychotic Kabalists, better known to the world as            "Zionists."
 The highest echelon within            this branch know that their 
ideology has            little to do with official Judaism, as          
  it has been put before us. They know            they are the 
privileged descendents of            ancestors who long served ancient  
          imperial concerns, such as the            Merovingians and 
Hapsburgs, etc. When            necessary, this group lends a modicum of
            sociopolitical power to the lowest level            of 
ill-informed but violent extremists            of all persuasions to run
 amok with            their fanatical ideologies, deliberately          
  wreaking havoc and unrest, so higher            agendas are not 
uncovered and thwarted. 
 |     
Philosopher Ayn Rand frequently warned readers         about the evils of         big government:
Instead of being a 
protector of man’s rights, the government is becoming their most 
dangerous violator; instead of guarding freedom the government is 
establishing slavery; instead of protecting men from the initiators of 
physical force, the government is initiating physical force and coercion
 in any manner and issue it pleases; instead of serving as the 
instrument of objectivity in human relationships, the government is 
creating a deadly subterranean reign of uncertainty and fear…instead of 
protecting men from injury by whim, the government is arrogating to 
itself the power of unlimited whim, so that we are fast approaching the 
stage of the ultimate inversion: the stage where the government is free 
to do anything it pleases, while the citizens may act only by 
permission; which is the stage of the darkest periods of human history, 
the stage of rule by brute force. 
 |    
Rand laid it on the line         when addressing the crimes of         government:
Criminals are a 
small minority in any age or community. And the harm they have dome to 
mankind is infinitesimal when compared to the horrors - the bloodshed, 
the wars, the persecution, the famines, the enslavements, the wholesale 
destruction - perpetrated by mankind’s governments. Potentially,
 a government is the most dangerous threat to man’s rights - When 
unlimited and unrestricted by individual rights, a government is men’s 
deadliest enemy. 
 |    
Before
 her         perceptive words were written, French         philosopher  
                Pierre Joseph Proudhon addressed         the "people 
versus government" problem:
To be 
Governed is to be watched, inspected,          spied upon, directed, 
law-driven, numbered,          regulated, enrolled, indoctrinated, 
preached at,          controlled, checked, estimated, valued,          
censured, commanded, by creatures who have          neither the right 
nor the wisdom nor the virtue          to do so. To be Governed is to be
 at every          operation, at every transaction noted,          
registered, counted, taxed, stamped, measured,          numbered, 
assessed, licensed, authorized,          admonished, prevented, 
forbidden, reformed,          corrected, punished. It is, under pretext 
of          public utility, and in the name of the general          
interest, to be placed under contribution,          drilled, fleeced, 
exploited, monopolized,          extorted from, squeezed, hoaxed, 
robbed; then,          at the slightest resistance, the first word of   
       complaint, to be repressed, fined, vilified,          harassed, 
hunted down, abused, clubbed,          disarmed, bound, choked, 
imprisoned, judged,          condemned, shot, deported, sacrificed, 
sold,          betrayed; and to crown all, mocked, ridiculed,          
derided, outraged, dishonored. That is          government; that is its 
justice; that is its          morality - (General          Idea of the Revolution in the Nineteenth Century) 
 |    
Victorian philosopher                            Herbert Spencer pondered whether man requires         governments at all:
What, then, do they 
(Humans) want a government for? Not to regulate commerce; not to educate
 the people; not to teach religion; not to administer charity; not to 
make roads and railways; but simply to defend the natural rights of man -
 to protect person and property - to prevent the aggressions of the 
powerful upon the weak - in a word, to administer justice. This is the 
natural, the original, office of a government. It was not intended to do
 less: it ought not to be allowed to do more -  (The Man Versus the State) 
 |    
He also         wrote:
The great political 
superstition of the past was the divine right of kings. The great 
political superstition of the present is the divine right of 
parliaments. 
 |    
Father of the 
Anarchist movement, Mikhail Bakunin         -         who spent many 
years imprisoned in dungeons - knew         all about government 
oppression. For him         governments were unnecessary institutions 
that         darkened the world:
The liberty of man 
consists solely in this, that he obeys the laws of nature, because he 
has himself recognized them as such, and not because they have been 
imposed upon him externally by any foreign will whatsoever, human or 
divine, collective or individual - (God and the State, 1882) 
 |    
German philosopher 
Friedrich Nietzsche understood          why governments exist, and how 
they maintain          their malignant dominion:
...a fullness of 
state power such as only          despotism had enjoyed...surpassed all 
         the past because it strove for the formal          annihilation
 of the individual...Once the earth          is brought under 
all-embracing economic control,          then mankind will find it has 
been reduced to          machinery in its service, as a monstrous       
   clockwork system of ever smaller, more finely          adjusted 
wheels. 
 |    
Spanish         philosopher Jose Ortega Y Gasset explained State         corruption in these words:
         
This is          the gravest danger that today threatens          
civilization: State intervention, the absorption          of all 
spontaneous social effort by the State,          that is to say, of 
spontaneous historical          action, which in the long-run sustains, 
         nourishes and impels human destinies. 
 |    
His         sentiments were shared by the American critic Henry         L. Menken, who said the Federal State:
         
...has          spread out its powers until they penetrate to          
every act of the citizen, however secret, it has          begun to throw
 around its operations the high          dignity and impeccability of a 
State religion,          its agents become a separate and superior 
caste,          with authority to bind and loose...But it still         
 remains, as it was in the beginning, the common          enemy of all 
well-disposed industrious and          decent men. 
 |    
In his         important book on State totalitarianism,          Our Enemy: the State, Albert Jay Nock         explained the motives of State officials:
         It
 is          unfortunately none too well understood that,          just 
as the State has no money of its own, so it          has no power of its
 own. All power it has is          what society gives it, plus what it 
confiscates          from time to time on one pretext or another;       
   there is no other source from which State power          can be 
drawn. Therefore every assumption of          State power, whether by 
gift or seizure, leaves          society with so much less power; there 
is never,          nor can be, any strengthening of State power         
 without a corresponding and roughly equivalent          depletion of 
social power. 
 |    
Nock         
understands that there is not a jot of difference         between 
American Federalists and the diabolical         Socialists who have 
plagued the world. He put the         matter plainly:
         
The          superficial distinctions of Fascism, Bolshevism,          
Hitlerism, are the concern of journalists and          publicists, the 
serious student sees in them          only one root-idea of a complete 
conversion of          social power to State power...The positive       
   testimony of history is that the State          invariably had its 
origin in conquest and          confiscation. No known State known to 
history          originated in any other manner. 
 |    
| 
 
Freedom can go to hell, but apparently silly belief            systems and fanatical prejudices are welcome to stay. 
 |     
The men who         
profited from the Constitution's acceptance,         expertly used fear 
to further their interests and to         goad delegates into compliance
 with their will. They         manipulated the fact that Americans were 
traumatized         and exhausted by war. They stage-managed the        
 Conventions and controlled media reportage of events         in 
Virginia and Philadelphia.  
If the people had the time to relax and educate themselves, if they had paid attention to the warnings of Thomas Paine, Patrick Henry, and the other critics who suspected what the conspirators were planning, the Constitution would never have been ratified.  |    
The best the people belatedly received was the Bill of Rights drafted in 1791. It was expressly created to protect people
 against potential abuses of the ill-received Constitution. It was 
conceded to the American people by Madison, who by then had secured all 
that he and his Federalist colleagues demanded.   
A          
number of states had accepted the Constitution          with urgent 
recommendations for changes. At          first, it seemed that Congress 
would pay no          attention to these suggestions. Patrick Henry     
     and other then set up a clamor which had to be          heeded, and
 Congress referred the proposals to a          committee - Nevins and Commanger (Pocket          History of the U.S.) 
The federalists delayed ratification of the Bill of Rights for over two years while they organized the new federal courts and armed the judges with powers to counter individual rights - Kenneth W. Royce (Hologram of Liberty)  |    
The         
Federalists instigated virtual panic, and made sure         the people 
were not able to take time to         repair and think. Their 
representatives and         delegates were harried into accepting and 
signing         the Constitution. The same methods of "conflict control"
         have been used throughout the generations. They are still      
   being put to good use by politicians and parties. In the 1960s, 
Ex-Communist Jerry Kirk         discovered how the great game is played.
 He         eloquently explained the process in these words:
The        
  idea is to create a situation where the people          are so 
frightened of the chaos all around them,          that they will throw 
their arms up in the air          and shout “Federal Government, do 
something!”          And the only choice open will be Martial Law…The   
       Communists, black militants and revolutionaries          will 
never succeed in overthrowing the          government of the United 
States, but unless they          are stopped, they will scare the 
American people          into accepting Socialism from Washington, and  
        status rule from the Establishment. This is what          it is 
really all about. 
 |    
Expert on         the
 British takeover of America, G. Edward         Griffin, explains the 
mechanics of conflict-control in these words:
…deliberately create
 problems, and then offer only those solutions which result in the 
expansion of government. Create conditions so frightful at home and 
abroad that the abandonment of personal liberties and national 
sovereignty will appear as a reasonable price for a return to domestic 
tranquility and world peace - (The Capitalist Conspiracy) 
 |    
Student         
Socialist agitator James S.         Kunen also discovered how         
the upper echelon conspires to foment social unrest,         so the true
 enemies of freedom remain         undetected:
In the evening we 
went up to the University to check out a strategy meeting. A kid was 
giving a report on the SDS Convention. He said that...at the Convention 
men from Business International Round Tables...tried to buy up a few 
radicals...These men are the world's leading industrialists and they 
convene to decide how our lives are going to go. These are the guys who 
wrote the Alliance for Progress. They are the left wing of the ruling 
class...They offered to finance our demonstrations in Chicago (l968). We
 were offered Esso (Rockefeller) money. They want us to make a lot of 
radical commotion so they can look more in the center as they move to 
the left - (The Strawberry Statement: Notes of a College Revolutionary) 
 |    
The         scrapping
 of the US Constitution is essential.         Americans must revise and 
update the Articles of         Confederation and abolish the         
corrupt totalitarian Federal apparatus of control. Americans must wake  
       up from their delirium and find out what kind of         
conspiracy has been occurring in their land. They         must 
contemplate the words of Bertrand de Jouvenal,         who said         
        "A society of sheep must in time beget a          government of 
wolves," and remember that it was         mutineers and not conformists 
who founded America.
The traitors are still with us. Indeed their treachery is greater than ever. Hiding behind the Constitution and political process they see to it America's ports are sold and that schools are swamped and under-funded. Because of their scandalous policies America's heavy industry operates at a minimum. American businesses are throttled by legality and taxation, while foreign-made products fill the shelves. Companies and jobs are perpetually outsourced, prisons supersize and innocent men and women languish behind bars to be raped and tortured. Poisons fall from the sky in the form of chemtrails, and illegal aliens occupy like invading armies, enjoying the "fruits" they did nothing to cultivate or harvest. It all occurs in a country that came out of World War II richer than it went in.
Why is this the case? What has happened? Why have so few taken so much from so many for so long?
The traitors are still with us. Indeed their treachery is greater than ever. Hiding behind the Constitution and political process they see to it America's ports are sold and that schools are swamped and under-funded. Because of their scandalous policies America's heavy industry operates at a minimum. American businesses are throttled by legality and taxation, while foreign-made products fill the shelves. Companies and jobs are perpetually outsourced, prisons supersize and innocent men and women languish behind bars to be raped and tortured. Poisons fall from the sky in the form of chemtrails, and illegal aliens occupy like invading armies, enjoying the "fruits" they did nothing to cultivate or harvest. It all occurs in a country that came out of World War II richer than it went in.
Why is this the case? What has happened? Why have so few taken so much from so many for so long?
As of 2000, USA 
Today reports on its front page that 6.6 million adults (three percent 
of the adult population) are in prison or “correction.” No other society
 as ever done so deadly a thing to its people and on such a scale - Gore Vidal (Imperial America) 
We have two million people in jail. Our country doesn't build hospitals, doesn't build schools and doesn't build day-care centers. It builds prisons. This is not the hallmark of a free society, but of a police state - Steven Hager (High Times Editor-in-Chief)  |    
Oriental countries 
prosper and         rise economically. The Third World is fast becoming 
        the First World, while the First World nose-dives         into 
ruin. This was the plan from the outset. It is         the result of tyranny
 not democracy. It is also the         result of apathy. No truer words 
on the subject were         stated than those by President Abraham 
Lincoln:
These United States 
of America can never be destroyed from forces outside its borders. If 
America falls, it will fall from within. Brought down by apathy. When 
good people do nothing, Anarchy reigns - (Letter to Congress, 1854) 
 |    
Lincoln also         
emphasized the despotism of wealthy oligarchs         who prosper from 
the ignorance and apathy of the         masses.
The        
  money power preys upon the nation in times of          peace and 
conspires against it in times of          adversity. It is more despotic
 than a monarchy,          more insolent than autocracy, more selfish 
than          bureaucracy. 
 |    
Robert Maynard Hutchins also         commented on the apathetic state brought on by         over-stimulation and trauma:
The death 
of democracy is          not likely to be an assassination from 
ambush. It will be a slow extinction from apathy,          indifference,
 and undernourishment. 
 |    
Senator from         Nevada, George W. Malone, made the following statement before Congress         in 1957:
           
       I believe that if the people of          this nation fully 
understood what Congress has          done to them over the last 49 
years, they would          move on Washington; they would not wait for 
an          election...It adds up to a preconceived plan to          
destroy the economic and social independence of          the United 
States! 
 |    
Ironically, during 
and after the War         of Independence the eyes of the world were on 
        America. The Czar of Russia, Nicholas Romanov II,         
admired what he saw taking place and, before his         brutal 
assassination, was ready to emulate the         scintillating American 
experiment. During the War of         Independence he sent ships, money 
and troops         to assist American rebels. Russia and many         
other countries would         have changed for the better had Americans 
not been         cajoled into adopting the Constitution.
The good news is that
 even the most oppressive tyranny cannot last forever. Once the tyrant 
and his heinous industry is exposed, the game is up. At that point they 
can be overthrown, and things can be put aright. It has happened in 
Ireland and the Congo, in Cuba and Nicaragua, and many other lands. But 
the enemy knows this only too well. He understands that he is 
vulnerable, and is aware of how he could be undermined. As a result, he 
is constantly on guard. He knows that his activities and methods must 
not be properly scrutinized. Consequently, he makes a point of keeping 
his subjects in fear for their lives. He prefers them to be limbic 
creatures unable to reason and discern good from bad and right from 
wrong. He makes sure their attention is focused elsewhere, and that 
strange, demented, and frightening "enemies" are always rattling the 
gates. Through his obedient agents, he funds and controls the supposed 
enemies, and instructs them how to operate. 
In this manner is the great game of geopolitics and mass control played. It is simply chess on a global level. Should a pawn fall off the board or be sacrificed, the kings, queens and bishops do not turn a hair. The comfortably placed misleaders bang the drums of war and send dedicated men and women to fight and die for the "United States" corporation. The U.S. is a business, and those who have given their lives for it died uselessly. Tragically they have been sacrificed at the behest of their country's true enemies. As Count Leo Tolstoy wisely said "Government is an association of men who do violence to the rest of us."  |      
George William Frederick (George III), King of Great Britain and Hanover. He was a member of the Hanover dynasty - the so-called House of Orange. Like numerous royals, he was a demented maniac who suffered from mental disease. According to author George Trevelyan, he vowed "never to acknowledge the independence of the Americans, and to punish their contumacy by the indefinite prolongation of a war which promised to be eternal." He wanted to "keep the rebels harassed, anxious and poor, until the day when, by a natural and inevitable process, discontent and disappointment were converted into penitence and remorse."  |     
Military men are dumb, stupid animals, to be used as pawns for foreign policy - Henry Kissinger (January-February 2003 edition of Eagle Newsletter) 
It's not a number I’m terribly interested in - Colin Powell (reply when asked about the Iraqi casualties) The men who committed this atrocity in New York, on September Eleventh 2001, mass murdered more people than the combined killings of every serial killer in the 228 year history of the United States - Anthony J. Hilder (The Greatest Lie Ever Sold)  |    
 
President Andrew Jackson suffered terribly at under the British Crown. During the war he and his brother were captured, held prisoner and nearly starved to death. When Andrew refused to clean the boots of a Red Coat, he was slashed with a sword which left him with scars on his head and left hand. His brother Robert died from smallpox contracted while a captive. Jackson's immediate family died from wartime hardships. As a result of these horrific experiences Jackson never forgave the British oppressors.  |     
Our
 point is         simple. We insist that the predators and parasites    
     who have vampirized America and the world must be         closely 
studied. Understanding how and why they         function as they do 
provides us with the keys         of worldly salvation.  
Moreover, we must understand that the elite despots of the world are creatures of habit. The enjoy repetition and their nefarious strategies are tried and true. Additionally, we must understand that these demagogues bank on one human weakness, forgetfulness. Historical amnesia hands them the power they covet. As Milan Kundera so appropriately said: "The struggle of man against power is the struggle of memory against forgetting." The answer to humankind's future lies in remembering what has transpired in history. It lies in not repeating past mistakes, and not falling for the same tired political fallacies. Furthermore, we must end our psychological dependence on the fiends who have established despotic forms of government and who benefit from our allegiance. As long as we consciously or unconsciously identify with the predator, we will never see the demise of tyranny, regardless of the political action taken. It will raise its ugly head time after time. Ultimately we must judge our misleaders by their deeds rather than their words. We must be on guard against their rhetoric and sophistry, and not hesitate to use existing laws to prevent them doing their worst. We must not be afraid to seek justice when degenerate, self-serving politicians - supposedly acting in our name - seek to lead us astray.  |    
         
Civil disobedience is not our          problem. Our problem is civil 
obedience. Our          problem is that numbers of people all over the  
        world have obeyed the dictates of the leaders of          their 
government and have gone to war, and          millions have been killed 
because of this          obedience...Our problem is that people are     
     obedient all over the world in the face of          poverty and 
starvation and stupidity, and war,          and cruelty. Our problem is 
that people are          obedient while the jails are full of petty     
     thieves, and all the while the grand thieves are          running 
the country. That's our problem          - Howard Zinn 
 |    
| 
 
Americans don't care about politics,            only about politicians - Anthony            Wedgwood Benn 
 |     
The
 Articles         of Confederation worked to bring security to all      
   Americans. They restored order after the chaos of         the War of 
Independence. Unlike the US Constitution,         the Articles of 
Confederation honored the rights of         individual States. 
The Articles did not distinguish between rich and poor. They were meant for Citizens, not "People," and did not permit an oligarchy to assume totalitarian control. The men who drafted and ratified the US Constitution were hungry for power over human beings. They adamantly wanted to protect their own prestige and wealth. Despite their megalomania they knew what they wanted and how to go about getting it. They acted like proverbial wolves in sheep's clothing. Their Constitution is deceptive in form and substance. It allowed an aristocracy to preside in America. The American-based aristocrats may not wear crowns or sit upon thrones, but they are in many cases directly related or connected to royal dynasties of Britain and Europe.  | 
George
 W. Bush is for example a distant cousin of John Kerry, the presidential
 nominee who ran against him in 2004. Kerry's parents are not Irish but 
Jewish. On the matter of his aristocratic ancestry we read:
Senator John Kerry 
has blue blood from all the royal houses of Europe, with even more 
titled relations than President Bush…Burke’s Peerage, which researches 
the genealogy, said the Democratic presidential candidate traces descent
 through his mother, Rosemary Forbes, to the royal houses of Albania, 
England, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Russia, Byzantium, Persia (Iran) and 
France. Forbes was descended from William Forbes, the Laird of Newe, and
 extended family that included many baronets…It is via this family that 
the Democratic candidate is descended from Henry II, the king of England
 and father of Richard the Lionheart, who was the leader of the third 
Crusade in 1189…By contrast, Bush is related to Queen Elizabeth II, 
twenty British dukes and many European princes…President Bush, Princess 
Diana and Winston Churchill are distantly related - (Union Jack Newspaper; September 2000 Edition) 
 |    
George H. W.         Bush and wife Barbara are related to the same         British oligarchs. Additionally, George is:
...closely
 related to every European monarch on          and off the throne – and 
has kinship with every          member of Britain’s royal family, the 
House of          Windsor. He is the 13th cousin of Britain’s          
Queen Mother, and of her daughter Queen          Elizabeth, and is the 
13th cousin once removed          of the heir to the throne, Prince 
Charles.          Bush’s family tree can be documented as far back      
    as the early 15th century. He has a direct          descent from 
Henry III and from Henry VIII’s          sister Mary Tudor who was also 
the wife of Louis          XI of France. He is also descended from 
Charles          II of England - David Icke (Alice in          Wonderland and the World Trade Center Disaster) 
Father George and wife Barbara are both descendants of Godfroi de Bouillon who, in 1099, led European noblemen in the successful Crusade to recapture Jerusalem from the Islamic faith and moved into the King’s palace at Temple Mount…Godfroi de Bouillon was the first king of Jerusalem and the Duke of Lower Lorraine, a major region for the Illuminati bloodline - ibid  |    
The time has         
come for the veils of mystique to be torn away from         the 
so-called "Fathers" of the Constitution. They were not         champions
 of a free, sovereign nation, and their legacy is         neither 
auspicious nor grand. They chose to subvert         the Articles that 
guaranteed freedom to every         American. They coveted         power
 and made themselves fabulously         rich by exploiting the 
gullibility and ignorance         of the moral but illiterate, masses. 
In our time their         villainous counterparts in government have 
shifted         into overdrive. Their heinous acts of conquest, 
extortion and confiscation         know no bounds. As long as ignorance 
of the enemy's         nature persists, nothing will change, and the    
     pirates of Capitol Hill will         continue to ply their 
insidious trade. As King         George once demanded, the war against 
America was to be         waged eternally. His desire 
is being fulfilled as         every day passes. Unless the         
Machiavellian intrigues of his biological and         ideological 
descendants are exposed and overcome,         America's ruin is certain.
         The task is, however, impossible without         knowledge
 of the adversary. Knowledge is the         weapon we must use to 
eradicate the imperious         predators that lurk behind the long 
grass. of         history.
“Conspiracy!”
 One of the darkest words in the          language of man. Yet there is 
hardly a single          page of History that does not partially reveal 
         the deadly eye of Conspiracy at work.         It was a 
conspiracy that lead          Brutus against Caesar in the Roman senate 
on the          Ides of March...that plotted the betrayal of          
West Point by Benedict Arnold, during the          American 
Revolution…that led John Wilkes Booth          to the assassination of 
President Lincoln on          Good Friday 1865. The past record of man  
        is burdened with accounts of assassinations,          secret 
combines, palace plots and betrayals in          war. But
 in spite of          this clear record, an amazing number of people    
      have begun to scoff at the possibility of          conspiracy at 
work today. They dismiss such an          idea merely as a 
conspiratorial view - G.          Edward Griffin (The Capitalist Conspiracy) 
 |    
Knowledge of         
the enemy is the golden key that opens the gate to a         future free
 of tyranny and slavery. We not only owe         our children a freer   
      future - we owe it to our forebears. Those who         fought and 
labored to create the elements of         civilization we enjoy, but who
 were         treacherously undermined and robbed, must be         
remembered and reverently toasted. It is their         memory we honor, not that of their destroyers.
         Where other men have skimmed the          surface, Beard has gone through to the core.         
         He stayed months in Washington to get to the          core. In 
his search for ancient papers and          documents in the Treasury 
Department, he went          into vaults that were so filled with dust 
that          it was necessary to excavate the papers with a          
vacuum cleaner. But when he came back to the          surface he had 
damning evidence against a good          many of the "patriot fathers." 
He then knew why          they were so anxious, not only for a new      
    constitution, but for the particular kind of a          constitution
 that was afterward adopted -          Allan L. Benson (The Dishonest Constitution) 
 |    
Primary References
The Declatory Act
Society of the Cincinnati
The Constitution That Never Was
Anti-Federalism
The Articles of Confederation
The Articles of Confederation
The Articles of Confederation
George Washington Exposed
Masonic Presidents
American War of Independence
Declaration of Independence
The United States Constitution
The Philadelphia Convention
United States Bill of Rights
Aaron Burr
Federalist Party
Alien and Sedition Acts
Benjamin Franklin: Mason and Jew
Benjamin Franklin
Patrick Henry
Thomas Paine
Thomas Jefferson
William Paterson
Abraham Yates
Samuel Adams
Andrew Jackson
James Madison
Alexander Hamilton
Robert Morris
Nicholas Biddle
Benedict Arnold
Albert Gallatin
Second Bank of the United States
First Bank of the United States
The Federal Reserve Banks
Bank of Manhattan
History of Money
Gouverneur Morris
Jewish Merchant Bankers
Haym Soloman
The Rothschilds
Rothschilds & their Awards
Jews in the Bush Administration
History of the Jews in England
Menasseh Ben Israel
Israel Jacobson
The Hofjuden (Palace Jews)
The Hofjuden (Palace Jews)
James Wilson
Richard Lawrence
The Whiskey Rebellion
Shay's Rebellion
Tontine Capitalism
Baron de Montesquieu
John Locke
The Hellfire Club
Philolexian Society
King George III
King William I (of the Netherlands)
House of Wettin
Saxe-Coburg-Gotha dynasty 1
Saxe-Coburg-Gotha dynasy 2
The Hesse-Kassel dynasty 1
The Hesse-Kassel dynasty 2
House of Hanover
House of Windsor
Duchy of Brunswick-Lüneburg
The State of Hesse
The State of Thuringia
Society General of Belgium
Direct Representation
Society of the Cincinnati
The Constitution That Never Was
Anti-Federalism
The Articles of Confederation
The Articles of Confederation
The Articles of Confederation
George Washington Exposed
Masonic Presidents
American War of Independence
Declaration of Independence
The United States Constitution
The Philadelphia Convention
United States Bill of Rights
Aaron Burr
Federalist Party
Alien and Sedition Acts
Benjamin Franklin: Mason and Jew
Benjamin Franklin
Patrick Henry
Thomas Paine
Thomas Jefferson
William Paterson
Abraham Yates
Samuel Adams
Andrew Jackson
James Madison
Alexander Hamilton
Robert Morris
Nicholas Biddle
Benedict Arnold
Albert Gallatin
Second Bank of the United States
First Bank of the United States
The Federal Reserve Banks
Bank of Manhattan
History of Money
Gouverneur Morris
Jewish Merchant Bankers
Haym Soloman
The Rothschilds
Rothschilds & their Awards
Jews in the Bush Administration
History of the Jews in England
Menasseh Ben Israel
Israel Jacobson
The Hofjuden (Palace Jews)
The Hofjuden (Palace Jews)
James Wilson
Richard Lawrence
The Whiskey Rebellion
Shay's Rebellion
Tontine Capitalism
Baron de Montesquieu
John Locke
The Hellfire Club
Philolexian Society
King George III
King William I (of the Netherlands)
House of Wettin
Saxe-Coburg-Gotha dynasty 1
Saxe-Coburg-Gotha dynasy 2
The Hesse-Kassel dynasty 1
The Hesse-Kassel dynasty 2
House of Hanover
House of Windsor
Duchy of Brunswick-Lüneburg
The State of Hesse
The State of Thuringia
Society General of Belgium
Direct Representation
Additional References
Trading With The Enemy Act (Origin of the US Slave Nation)
Court and Lawyer Corruption 1
Court and Lawyer Corruption 2
The Crown Corporation
The Corporation of London
Who Owns the World?
British Control of USA-1
British Control of USA-2
British Control of USA-3
The United States is still a British Colony 1
The United States is still a British Colony 2
British Infiltration of America: Proof from the Congressional Record
How Britain Caused the American Depression
British Banks Own US Federal Reserve
Secret Proceedings & Debates of the Convention
The Largest Empire in the World
Lord Palmerston's Multicultural Zoo
The British East India Company
Dutch East India Company
Virginia Company
Hudson Bay Company
Massachusetts Bay Company
Ohio Company of Virginia
Mississippi Company
Potomac Company
Vandalia Company
Philolexian Society
The Russell Trust
The Pilgrims Society
Who Rules America?
Georgetown University
World Trade Organization
Council on Foreign Relations
Trilateral Commission
The Royal Institute of International Affairs
Edward Mandell House
The Congress of Vienna
The League of Nations
Dope Inc
Dr. John Coleman vids
The Black Venetians I
The Black Venetians II
Secrets of the Federal Reserve
Secret Societies & Subversive Movements
The Burr Conspiracy
Stolen Government
The Kellogg-Briand Pact
Court and Lawyer Corruption 1
Court and Lawyer Corruption 2
The Crown Corporation
The Corporation of London
Who Owns the World?
British Control of USA-1
British Control of USA-2
British Control of USA-3
The United States is still a British Colony 1
The United States is still a British Colony 2
British Infiltration of America: Proof from the Congressional Record
How Britain Caused the American Depression
British Banks Own US Federal Reserve
Secret Proceedings & Debates of the Convention
The Largest Empire in the World
Lord Palmerston's Multicultural Zoo
The British East India Company
Dutch East India Company
Virginia Company
Hudson Bay Company
Massachusetts Bay Company
Ohio Company of Virginia
Mississippi Company
Potomac Company
Vandalia Company
Philolexian Society
The Russell Trust
The Pilgrims Society
Who Rules America?
Georgetown University
World Trade Organization
Council on Foreign Relations
Trilateral Commission
The Royal Institute of International Affairs
Edward Mandell House
The Congress of Vienna
The League of Nations
Dope Inc
Dr. John Coleman vids
The Black Venetians I
The Black Venetians II
Secrets of the Federal Reserve
Secret Societies & Subversive Movements
The Burr Conspiracy
Stolen Government
The Kellogg-Briand Pact
                Recommended Reading (Selected List):
Dope Inc  - L. Larouche, W. Tarpley (& Co)
Treason in America - Anton Chaitkin
The Quartet - Joseph J. Ellis
Hamilton's Curse - Thomas DiLorenzo
The Syndicate - Nicholas Hagger
The Secret History of the West - Nicolas Hagger
The Secret Founding of America - NIcholas Hagger
The Empire of the City - E. C. Knuth
Hologram of Liberty - Kenneth. W. Royce
Our Enemy: the State - Albert Jay Nock
An Economic Interpretation of the Constitution - Charles A. Beard
The Constitution That Never Was - Ralph Boryszewski
The Federalist Papers - Douglas Adair
Secret Societies of America's Elite - Steven Stora
The Secret Terrorists - Bill Hughes
The Enemy Unmasked - Bill Hughes
The Real Lincoln - Thomas DiLorenzo
Blacklisted by History - M. Stanton Evans
The Ruling Elite - Deanna Springola
America's Secret Establishment - Anthony Sutton
Trilaterals Over America - Anthony Sutton
The Creature from Jekyll Island - G. Edward Griffin
The Capitalist Conspiracy - G. Edward Griffin
The World Order - Eustace Mullins
Secrets of the Federal Reserve - Eustace Mullins
Tragedy and Hope - Dr. Carroll Quigley
The Anglo-American Establishment - Dr. Carroll Quigley
Bloodlines of the Illuminati - Fritz Springmeier
Our Invisible Government - Myron Fagan
CFR Unmasked - Myron Fagan
The Illuminati - Myron Fagan
The Invisible Government - Dan Smoot
The Unseen Hand - Ralph Epperson
Conspirator's Hierarchy: The Committee of 300 - J. Coleman
The Tavistock Institute of Human Relations - John Coleman
Diplomacy By Deception - John Coleman
None Dare Call It Treason - John Stormer
The Rockefeller File - Sen. Gary Allen
None Dare Call It Conspiracy - Sen. Gary Allen
Kissinger: The Secret Side of the Secretary of State - Sen. Gary Allen
In the Beginning: Story of the International Trade Cartel - R. K. Hoskins
The True History of the Bilderberg Group - Daniel Estulin
Secret Societies & Subversive Movements - Nesta Webster
The French Revolution - Nesta Webster
World Revolution - Nesta Webster
Illuminsim - Nesta Webster
Occult Theocracy - Edith Star Mille (Lady Queensborough)
Architects of Deception - Juri Lina
Under the Sign of the Scorpion - Juri Lina
My Awakening - David Duke
Controversy of Zion - Douglas Reed
The Power of Israel in the United States - James Petras
War is a Racket - Gen. Smedley D. Butler
Death by Government - R. J. Rummell
Fifty Years in the Church of Rome - Father Chiniquy
The Secret History of the Jesuits - Edmund Paris
Vatican Billions - Avro Manhattan
The Vatican Moscow Washington Alliance - Avro Manhattan
Catholic Imperialism & World Freedom - Avro Manhattan
The Vatican Holocaust - Avro Manhattan
Vatican Assassins - Eric Jon Phelps
Click here for more legal empowerment vids and sources
Click here for additional threads on Empire of Death, War on You, Important Teachers, etc
http://www.michaeltsarion.com/constitution-con.html
Treason in America - Anton Chaitkin
The Quartet - Joseph J. Ellis
Hamilton's Curse - Thomas DiLorenzo
The Syndicate - Nicholas Hagger
The Secret History of the West - Nicolas Hagger
The Secret Founding of America - NIcholas Hagger
The Empire of the City - E. C. Knuth
Hologram of Liberty - Kenneth. W. Royce
Our Enemy: the State - Albert Jay Nock
An Economic Interpretation of the Constitution - Charles A. Beard
The Constitution That Never Was - Ralph Boryszewski
The Federalist Papers - Douglas Adair
Secret Societies of America's Elite - Steven Stora
The Secret Terrorists - Bill Hughes
The Enemy Unmasked - Bill Hughes
The Real Lincoln - Thomas DiLorenzo
Blacklisted by History - M. Stanton Evans
The Ruling Elite - Deanna Springola
America's Secret Establishment - Anthony Sutton
Trilaterals Over America - Anthony Sutton
The Creature from Jekyll Island - G. Edward Griffin
The Capitalist Conspiracy - G. Edward Griffin
The World Order - Eustace Mullins
Secrets of the Federal Reserve - Eustace Mullins
Tragedy and Hope - Dr. Carroll Quigley
The Anglo-American Establishment - Dr. Carroll Quigley
Bloodlines of the Illuminati - Fritz Springmeier
Our Invisible Government - Myron Fagan
CFR Unmasked - Myron Fagan
The Illuminati - Myron Fagan
The Invisible Government - Dan Smoot
The Unseen Hand - Ralph Epperson
Conspirator's Hierarchy: The Committee of 300 - J. Coleman
The Tavistock Institute of Human Relations - John Coleman
Diplomacy By Deception - John Coleman
None Dare Call It Treason - John Stormer
The Rockefeller File - Sen. Gary Allen
None Dare Call It Conspiracy - Sen. Gary Allen
Kissinger: The Secret Side of the Secretary of State - Sen. Gary Allen
In the Beginning: Story of the International Trade Cartel - R. K. Hoskins
The True History of the Bilderberg Group - Daniel Estulin
Secret Societies & Subversive Movements - Nesta Webster
The French Revolution - Nesta Webster
World Revolution - Nesta Webster
Illuminsim - Nesta Webster
Occult Theocracy - Edith Star Mille (Lady Queensborough)
Architects of Deception - Juri Lina
Under the Sign of the Scorpion - Juri Lina
My Awakening - David Duke
Controversy of Zion - Douglas Reed
The Power of Israel in the United States - James Petras
War is a Racket - Gen. Smedley D. Butler
Death by Government - R. J. Rummell
Fifty Years in the Church of Rome - Father Chiniquy
The Secret History of the Jesuits - Edmund Paris
Vatican Billions - Avro Manhattan
The Vatican Moscow Washington Alliance - Avro Manhattan
Catholic Imperialism & World Freedom - Avro Manhattan
The Vatican Holocaust - Avro Manhattan
Vatican Assassins - Eric Jon Phelps
Click here for more legal empowerment vids and sources
Click here for additional threads on Empire of Death, War on You, Important Teachers, etc
http://www.michaeltsarion.com/constitution-con.html














11 comments:
This is total folly!!!
I got to this paragraph:
"The con is evident from the Constitution's Preamble, as we said. In fact the "People" referred to are not citizens of America, No! They are the elites who rule from within a legally separate precinct known as the District of Columbia. This district is under federal control and the government operating from within it is, legally speaking, a foreign institution. The term "We the People" denotes this separate ruling elite. It refers to the imperious overlords who have granted the Constitution to the masses within the "United States of America" - the non-sovereign nation under their control. Therefore, the entity mentioned in the first line of the Preamble is not the same entity mentioned in the last line. Let's read it again and uncover the cunning artifice of its authors:"
and had to stop. The writer of this article has the IQ of a 10 year old. Of course the people referred to in the Preamble were not citizens of America. THERE WAS NO AMERICA AT THE TIME!!! [written while banging my head against the wall] And they were not elites ruling from D.C. THERE WAS NO DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AT THAT TIME [more head banging against the wall]. The men who wrote the constitution were property owners who were interested in protecting their property against government theft and taxation. However, nowhere in the constitution does it say only the elite have the right to vote, have the right to a grand jury indictment for crimes, have the right to a jury of their peers, have the right to arrest by warrant w/probable cause, have the right to having property seized only after due process, etc., etc. Show me where it says this was reserved to the elite in the constitution.
Unfortunately, this country has evolved into a complete state of ignorance, and this article is perfect proof of that. This ignorance has allowed those with the money to rule because of the laziness and greed inherent in human nature, and it is no more evident than on this blog by people who can't read for themselves and let other people, like the idiot who wrote this, try to think for them. Nobody here deserves a republic, you would not know what to do with it if it slapped you in the face. No apologies to anyone who would accept crap like this.
I always find it interesting when someone has a view which they do not want to be open about, they resort to attacking the messenger or the writer of the article. i.e. IQ of a 10 year old! As soon as I read something like that, and identify you are writing as "anonymous" afraid to give your name/identity/or something telling us readers more about your point of view, that I get rather turned off to your comments. If you would have left out comments such as these it would be much easier to understand and take your thoughts into consideration. But no, ignorance, ignorance is an element of the people when they are pushed into being powerless due to lacking education, or lacking means to do more. Funny you say laziness and greed are inherent to human nature. But psychology teaches us that greed and laziness are more inherent to those who have the means of satisfying their needs, those with money want more money and not to share it, that this country has not evolved into this state but has been politically driven and forced into this point by the elite's greed and lack of open mindedness for an eternal peace on this land and all lands. All the author of this message is presenting is information that is not openly available with everyday education or simple research. This was years in the works, this was demonstrating of vast references which are shared for us to see for ourselves, and not from someone like you who instead says we are nobody's and don't deserve a republic! Your opinion disgusts me because of how closed minded it is. Allow the people to know the truth and power can be shared, rather than forced upon the people, who you intend to continue to rule.
Kindly read all articles on this blog and be educated. On the other hand you might be AI, a fiendish joker leaving its calling card. Now interpret the data. Get lost!
Triad Claw Hand Sign Suggests Massive Satanic Conspiracy
To perceptive individuals specifically:
UPDATE ON GITMO ARRESTS 01032018
I have read much of this in separate places , but never put together in one convenient massive presentation, this would constirute a PHD. in hidden American history.......Should be taught in schools where real education is taking place.
Not so in U.S. indoctrination centers , falsely called "schools"........... Bravo
I agree. This is a wealth of knowledge.
I agree this is a wealth of information...not all true and accurate but there none the less
This article is like biting the hand that fed you. If it were not for those founding fathers, (some of which had plenipotentiary authority) were able to get much needed international HELP by becoming a legit nation with a organic constitution. Otherwise you stood in breach to put it lightly. This article fails to identify that the so called CON stitution saved his ancestors from destruction. It gave this nation standing at law. NOW WHO DIS AGREES?!
and let it be know again that the first country to recognize this place as a nation was Morocco whom dominions were given by the sultan as CREDIT. this is the Unum e pluribus it means debtor. The Constitution simultaneously with the treaty of peace and friendship. The USA has a banner of amity and commerce (which is always to hang and never flies)
that's all she is folks. A friendly place to do business. If you came from abroad then you came as a servant to business. You are under treaty and must stay in the matrix. Or you can be naturalized into the aboriginal and become what they call um um DANCES WITH WOLVES. don't get mad and call the founders traitors or the constitution a con job. lol.
The info is very interesting, however difficult to read when the color of some info makes the words indistinguishable and unreadable - please have the words in a DARK color
additionally, the "Con" was acquired by using the portion of the Articles that allow
agreements between "states" with the consent of Congress - did not require 100% by all parties, and I think I read that the word "People" referred to the "States" and was discussed as appropriate lingual usage - it is in the Notes and Patrick Henry objected to the use of the word "People" and not "States" in the opening statement
Post a Comment