Donations Request

DUE TO DELAYED ‘BLOCKED’ RV ----- STILL NEED SURVIVAL FUNDS! Your Donation Support For John’s Family Survival Is $450 URGENTLY REQUIRED by Sunday! Use the Pay pal button on the upper left or Checks/MOs can be mailed to John MacHaffie, 141 Partridge Circle, Winter Springs, FL 32708

Thursday, January 26, 2012

OBAMA ELIGIBILITY COURT CASE…BLOW BY BLOW

OBAMA ELIGIBILITY COURT CASE…BLOW BY BLOW
By Craig Andresen on January 26, 2012 at 9:25 am


Given the testimony from today’s court case in Georgia, Obama has a lot of explaining to do. His attorney, Jablonski, was a NO SHOW as of course, was Obama.

The following is a nutshell account of the proceedings.

Promptly at 9am EST, all attorneys involved in the Obama Georgia eligibility case were called to the Judge’s chambers. This was indeed a very interesting beginning to this long awaited and important case.

The case revolved around the Natural Born clause of the Constitution and whether or not Obama qualifies under it to serve. More to the point, if found ineligible, Obama’s name would not appear on the 2012 ballot in Georgia.

With the small courtroom crowded, several in attendance could be seen fanning themselves with pamphlets as they waited for the return of the attorneys and the appearance of the judge.

Obama himself, who had been subpoenaed to appear, of course was nowhere near Georgia. Instead, Obama was on a campaign swing appearing in Las Vegas and in Colorado ignoring the court in Georgia.

Over the last several weeks, Obama’s attorney, Michael Jablonski, had attempted several tactics to keep this case from moving forward. He first tried to have it dismissed, then argued that it was irrelevant to Obama. After that, Jablonski argued that a state could not, under the law, determine who would or would not be on a ballot and later, that Obama was simply too busy with the duties of office to appear.

After all these arguments were dispatched by the Georgia Court, Jablonski, in desperation, wrote to the Georgia Secretary of State attempting to place Obama above the law and declared that the case was not to he heard and neither he nor his client would participate.


Secretary of State, Brian Kemp, fired back a letter hours later telling Jablonski he was free to abandon the case and not participate but that he would do so at his and his clients peril.

Game on.

5 minutes.

10 minutes.

15 minutes with the attorneys in the judge’s chambers.

20 minutes.

It appears Jablonski is not in attendance as the attorneys return, all go to the plaintiff table 24 minutes after meeting in the judge’s chambers.

Has Obama’s attorney made good on his stated threat not to participate? Is he directly ignoring the court’s subpoena? Is he placing Obama above the law? It seems so. Were you or I subpoenaed to appear in court, would we or our attorney be allowed such action or, non action?

Certainly not.

Court is called to order.

Obama’s birth certificate is entered into evidence.

Obama’s father’s place of birth, Kenya East Africa is entered into evidence.

Pages 214 and 215 from Obama’s book, “Dreams from My Father” entered into evidence. Highlighted. This is where Obama indicates that, in 1966 or 1967 that his father’s history is mentioned. It states that his father’s passport had been revoked and he was unable to leave Kenya.

Immigration Services documents entered into evidence regarding Obama Sr.

June 27th, 1962, is the date on those documents. Obama’s father’s status shown as a non citizen of the United States. Documents were gotten through the Freedom of Information Act.

Testimony regarding the definition of Natural Born Citizen is given citing Minor vs Happersett opinion from a Supreme Court written opinion from 1875. The attorney points out the difference between “citizen” and “Natural Born Citizen” using charts and copies of the Minor vs Happersett opinion.

It is also pointed out that the 14th Amendment does not alter the definition or supersede the meaning of Natural Born. It is pointed out that lower court rulings do not conflict with the Supreme Court opinion nor do they over rule the Supreme Court Minor vs Happersett opinion.

The point is, to be a natural born citizen, one must have 2 parents who, at the time of the birth in question, be citizens of the United States. As Obama’s father was not a citizen, the argument is that Obama, constitutionally, is ineligible to serve as President.

Judge notes that as Obama nor his attorney is present, action will be taken accordingly.

Carl Swinson takes the stand.

Testimony is presented that the SOS has agreed to hear this case, laws applicable, and that the DNC of Georgia will be on the ballot and the challenge to it by Swinson.

2nd witness, a Mr. Powell, takes the stand and presents testimony regarding documents of challenge to Obama’s appearance on the Georgia ballot and his candidacy.

Court records of Obama’s mother and father entered into evidence.

Official certificate of nomination of Obama entered into evidence.

RNC certificate of nomination entered into evidence.

DNC language does NOT include language stating Obama is Qualified while the RNC document DOES. This shows a direct difference trying to establish that the DNC MAY possibly have known that Obama was not qualified.

Jablonski letter to Kemp yesterday entered into evidence showing their desire that these proceedings not take place and that they would not participate.

Dreams From My Father entered.

Mr. Allen from Tuscon AZ sworn in.

Disc received from Immigration and Naturalization Service entered into evidence. This disc contains information regarding the status of Obama’s father received through the Freedom of Information Act.

This information states clearly that Obama’s father was NEVER a U.S. Citizen.

At this point, the judge takes a recess.

The judge returns.

David Farrar takes the stand.

Evidence showing Obama’s book of records listing his nationality as Indoneasan. Deemed not relevant by the judge.

Orly Taitz calls 2nd witness. Mr. Strump.

Enters into evidence a portion of letter received from attorney showing a renewal form from Obama’s mother for her passport listing Obama’s last name something other than Obama.

State Licensed PI takes the stand.

She was hired to look into Obama’s background and found a Social Security number for him from 1979. Professional opinion given that this number was fraudulent. The number used or attached to Obama in 1979, shows that Obama was born in the 1890. This shows that the number was originally assigned to someone else who was indeed born in 1890 and should never have been used by Obama.

Same SS number came up with addresses in IL, D.C. and MA.

Next witness takes the stand.

This witness is an expert in information technology and photo shop. He testifies that the birth certificate Obama provided to the public is layered, multiple layered. This, he testifies, indicates that different parts of the certificate have been lifted from more than one original document.

Linda Jordan takes the stand.

Document entered regarding SS number assigned to Obama. SS number is not verified under E Verify. It comes back as suspected fraudulent. This is the system by which the Government verifies ones citizenship.

Next witness.

Mr. Gogt.

Expert in document imaging and scanners for 18 years.

Mr. Gogt testifies that the birth certificate, posted online by Obama, is suspicious. States white lines around all the type face is caused by “unsharp mask” in Photoshop. Testifies that any document showing this, is considered to be a fraud.

States this is a product of layering.

Mr. Gogt testifies that a straight scan of an original document would not show such layering.

Also testifies that the date stamps shown on Obama documents should not be in exact same place on various documents as they are hand stamped. Obama’s documents are all even, straight and exactly the same indicating they were NOT hand stamped by layered into the document by computer.

Next witness, Mr. Sampson a former police officer and former immigration officer specializing in immigration fraud.

Ran Obama’s SS number through database and found that the number was issued to Obama in 1977 in the state of MA. Obama never resided in MA. At the time of issue, Obama was living in Hawaii.

Serial number on birth certificate is out of sequence with others issued at that hospital. Also certification is different than others and different than twins born 24 hours ahead of Obama.

Mr. Sampson also states that portion of documents regarding Mr. Sotoroe, who adopted Obama have been redacted which is highly unusual with regards to immigration records.

Suggests all records from Social Security, Immigration, Hawaii birth records be made available to see if there are criminal charges to be filed or not. Without them, nothing can be ruled out.

Mr. Sampson indicates if Obama is shown not to be a citizen, he should be arrested and deported and until all records are released nobody can know for sure if he is or is not a U.S. Citizen.

Taitz shows records for Barry Sotoro aka Barack Obama, showing he resides in Hawaii and in Indonesia at the same time.

Taitz takes the stand herself.

Testifies that records indicate Obama records have been altered and he is hiding his identity and citizenship.

Taitz leave the stand to make her closing arguments.

Taitz states that Obama should be found, because of the evidence presented, ineligible to serve as President.

And with that, the judge closes the hearing.

What can we take away from this?

It’s interesting.

Now, all of this has finally been entered OFFICIALLY into court records.

One huge question is now more than ever before, unanswered.

WHO THE HELL IS THIS GUY?

Without his attorney present, Obama’s identity, his Social Security number, his citizenship status, and his past are all OFFICIALLY in question.

One thing to which there seems no doubt. He does NOT qualify, under the definition of Natural Born Citizen” provided by SCOTUS opinions, to be eligible to serve as President.

What will the judge decide? That is yet to be known, but it seems nearly impossible to believe, without counter testimony or evidence, because Obama and his attorney chose not to participate, that Obama will be allowed on the Georgia ballot.

It also opens the door for such cases pending or to be brought in other states as well.

Obama is in it deep and the DNC has some…a LOT…of explaining to do unless they start looking for a new candidate for 2012.

24 comments:

  1. Jablonski was allowed to be absent because the proceedings were only for show and the decision has already been rendered mute. If not, he would have been found in contempt of court, and fined or arrested. This ruling would have been in open court and a part of the official record. The fact that he was allowed to not participate is evident that everything was fake and for the cameras and the deal was struck behind closed doors. Normally, the case would have been thrown out and dismissed. Jablonski and Obama did the judge a favor by not appearing and making it obvious that he is unfit for his position while wasting the taxpayers time and money. Obviously a lame tactic by Republicans to keep Obama off the ballot any way possible. Desperation breeds ingenuity, because if there was an election, Obama would win the electoral delegates and votes from that state like he did in 2008. Orly Taitz is a sham.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I believe that the word you meant to use in your sentence was "moot" (deprived of practical significance) as opposed to "mute" (unable to speak).

      Delete
  2. "After all these arguments were dispatched by the Georgia Court, Jablonski, in desperation, wrote to the Georgia Secretary of State attempting to place Obama above the law and declared that the case was not to he heard and neither he nor his client would participate.
    Secretary of State, Brian Kemp, fired back a letter hours later telling Jablonski he was free to abandon the case and not participate but that he would do so at his and his clients peril."
    We can all fantasize about how 'untouchable' corrupt political partiers are, facts is, these are felony offenses. When we look at congress/senate voting yes on senate bill 1867 - it makes sense, those who 'helped him' forge this, and get this far, did so for scapegoat purposes they've had it scripted from the start. As the state of the union address began, couldn't help notice congress / senate all grinning from ear to ear, he didn't mention a single thing about "Oh well we passed SB 1867 so- all you viewers can now be detained indefinitely without acces to a liar or trial, where you'll rot to death." They're all full of C___.

    ReplyDelete
  3. SHAM!!! And what is Obama ?? I would like to see some one give an account for each and every question raised point by point. If I was parading thru a TSA check point with a fake SS# would I be able to say to TSA, "F U , You guys are a SHAM" !!!? Who made the deal in the backround.Are all the states of no account to hold the fed govt accountable. I suppose not cuz we as people arent able to either, is this what we have come to as a people and a nation. Is this action what our brave men throughout the decades have fought and died for and shed their blood and terminated their heritage and seed to see a usurper steal our great nation by cheap slight of hand and destroy what it realy means to be FREE and an American. God Help us, I pray Obama and his cohorts receive Gods just punishment for their debauchery.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I have yet to be asked for any SSN at TSA. That is not considered valid id. I pray you receive the punishment of TSA if you should present this to them and call it identification. Your post reads like "blah blah, blood, blah, brave blah.." Come on.

      Delete
    2. Anon 7:40 PM
      I guess you are one of the OBAMA lovers HUH ?

      Delete
  4. I, can see only one way out and that is for them to admit that Obama is only the President of the "US Corporation", and it has nothing to do with the American people.In my opinion congress is who we voted in the Office and they should be held accountable to the people.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Are you too from a foreign country? Were you born beyond the realm of these United States? Are you willing to spend more taxpayer money for a demon whose only task was to "take down" by any means possible this country that we love. Do you want to be a bankrupt nation? So many of our countrymen have died to preserve our way of life and here, one person with the complicity of many others, demonstrates his zealousness to overturn the rules of law of our beloved country. I happily await the future decision of the Georgia Court and the court decisions to be made by other states. Hopefully decisions about dramatic complicity will also surface.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I believe that the biggest problem on this 3D Earth is that accurate and true information is very very hard to find and perceive because so many sources have agendas that are not in the best interests of the captured slaves. Earth sources promote deception to maintain total control.
    Everyone is going through their lives taking in information and making daily decisions and upcoming plans based on what they believe to be truthful facts. Everyone operates on a sort of autopilot that receives input and then generates their own output that they assume is correct.
    But, there is a higher truth at work that is best seen with our own computers - that is, that if you put faulty information in to a computer - one cannot expect to get reliably good output out,
    ie, GARBAGE-In results in GARBAGE-Out.
    Americans need to verify that their incoming information is actually verifiable truth first before they begin the process of arriving at a conclusion that will affect their words and their acts.
    Being as wise as the serpents that have maintained control is not an easy task, fortunately the controllers are history after Dec 21 thanks to the Prime Creator.
    Blessings to all who seek truth, Light, and Divine Love.
    DE

    ReplyDelete
  7. Totally agree with Anon 12:01 PM: This was a dog and pony show. All the evidence was hearsay. Even the last witness, Sampson, stated they needed the original or certified copies of the Hawaiian birth records, immigration records and SSN records. This will never happen. As you know, Obama had all his records sealed his first day in office. The judge let Orly Taitz proceed since Obamas attorney was not there to object to the evidence she presented. What a waste of time and taxpayer money. The judge will rule in Obamas favor since he did not hold him in contempt of court. Obama is president and has executive privilege. Get ready for another 4 years of the Big O. I bet Obama is laughing his ass off.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And just WHY did he have his records sealed? That is done to HIDE criminal activity and/or discriminating facts that will have a negative effect on the person's plans or future. Some 40-50 yrs back, a political decision to NOT publish names and crimes of juveniles-and expunge those records when the juvenile reached if he/she committed no more crimes-in order to allow the person to develope into a citizen.

      Bozo had his records sealed to protect his run for the POTUS and to HIDE his eligibility to be POTUS. Should he be found ineligibnle to be POTUS, every rulke or law he signed into effect will be voided and he will become subject to criminal prosecution.

      Delete
  8. In response to the anonymous comment of 12:01 pm -

    Update 1:05 pm: Per telecon between G Wilmott and Dean Haskins which was relayed to me (CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret)). Dean Haskins who was in the courtroom this morning assisting with the Art 2Pac live stream. Judge Malihi talked to the attorneys in chambers before the hearing this morning and told them that he was going to enter a DEFAULT JUDGMENT against Obama and recommend that Obama’s name not be on the Georgia ballot! All the attorneys expressed a desire to put an abbreviated streamlined case on the record and the judge agreed. How does the mainstream media spin this? The Georgia SOS has already indicated that he will follow the judge’s recommendation. Obama will not get any popular vote or electors from the great state of Georgia! Congratulations to all freedom-loving Americans!

    the entire article can be viewed at: http://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2012/01/26/obama-challenge-hearing-gavel-to-gavel-live-video-stream-coverage-from-atlanta-ga/

    ReplyDelete
  9. Whether you're for or against Obama, Republican, Democrat or Socialist, Athiest or a church goer should NOT be the issue here. The question is are "We the People" being scammed?? If so, by who?? I for one am tired to being manipulated by politicians, mainstream media and everyone else trying to get my vote or money. I'm tired of politicians, lawyers and connected individuals who think that they're above the law when "We the People" suffer the consequences. Until "We the People" realize that it's us against them, and band together, nothing will change. "We the People" are the only ones that can change the system but we can't do it when the system has us separated into so many sub-groups. This a classic example of "Divide and Conquer" and until we can over come this, "We the People" will continue to be treated like lambs to the slaughter.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. From day one this has been an issue. Why then is it swept under the rug as to it's truth?
      Are we as taxpayers to believe we have been duped by those who are able to deal with law and to undermine it's value when either paid or undermined in another way,making the courts to be handled and swayed away from truth what this country was founded on? GOD HELP US!

      Delete
    2. I do believe you have a point. We do need for someone to stay on this and prove it out. I absolutely believe we have been scammed and what is scarey is--if we can be scammed like that by the government then how many other ways are we being deceived?? With everything presented the sequences of the birth certificate being wrong VS the twin born supposedly before him and the SS being from the wrong state and from 1890?? SOMEBODY BETTER OPEN THEIR EYES--SOMEBODY HELP!!!!

      Delete
  10. Obama has lied from day one about everything he claims to be, done, and his citizenship. This has been proven in many ways, and even through his own admissions, then covers them up with excuses why he said what he did. Confusion is not an acceptable excuse when you're talking about yourself. You know exactly what you are, what you've done, and what you said. Only liars would claim to be confused about themselves because they have to try to think of what the truth is supposed to be and get confused on the facts.

    Obama is not a US Citizen, if for no other reason, he has never applied for citizenship since 1967 when his (so called) citizenship was lost to become a citizen of Indonesia so that he could attend school in Indonesia. Indonesia did not allow dual citizenship during that time. And, the fact that his father was not a US Citizen disqualifies him as a Natural Born Citizen. Obama should be impeached and deported as an illegal alien and barred from ever entering the US again!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hopefully since this has been entered into a COURT system, other states will follow and adventually the pressure will become so great, someone will make real documents appear. It has been a lie from the get go. Just like him not being muslim. He wants to hold an office then have him to do it in a muslin country. NO problem with that.

      Delete
  11. I AGREE HE SHOULD BE IMPEACHED, DEPORTED AND HAVE TO TAKE WIFE AND KIDS WITH HIM

    ReplyDelete
  12. does anyone have the court docket number for the case?? would be interested in seeing all of it

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Docket Number: OSAH-SECSTATE-CE-
      : 1215137-60-MALIHI

      Delete
  13. The S.O.B. should be tried for treason and Hung on the White House Lawn along side Harry Reed and Nancy Pelosi Then Deport all three of there rotten Treasonous Dead Asses.

    ReplyDelete
  14. I'm no fan of Obama by any means, but I do believe in being honest about such issues.

    The Minor vs Happersett did not define Natural Born Citizen. Rather, it recognized that since Virginia Minor was born inside the United States and both parents were US citizens, then she was clearly a natural born citizen. In other words, there was no need to look any further to decide if she was a natural born citizen.

    Also, regarding giving up citizenship, many countries consider an emigrant who becomes a citizen to have surrendered their previous citizenship. But that is not binding for the United States. For the United States, you give up citizenship when you go to the embassy and formally surrender your US citizenship. If you do not formally and legally surrender your citizenship by the proscribed method, then you remain a citizen of the United States.

    I've heard that a parent cannot surrender the US citizenship of his children, but cannot say whether that is true or not. If it is, then to show that Obama surrendered his US citizenship, you must show that he personally formally and legally surrendered his citizenship in the presence of the proper US personnel.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Here Is The court Doc # OSAH-SECSTATE-CE-
    : 1215137-60-MALIHI "We the People" Have a right to view it...So Go for it !!!

    ReplyDelete