Judd v Obama
Final Draft
Posted on | September 12, 2012
“Plaintiffs are seeking a Declaratory Relief declaring Plaintiff Judd a winner of WV Democratic Primary election due to fraud and lack of eligibility of Candidate Obama, who was declared the winner of WV Democratic Primary election.”
INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF THE CASE
Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ.
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy Suite 100 Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688
Phone (949) 683-5411 fax (949) 766-7603
Email: Orly.taitz@gmail.com
CA Bar license 223433
Counselor for Plaintiffs
U.S. DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT REMOVED FROM THE SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
CASE 30-2012-00582135 originally captioned
as Taitz v Obama, Feinstein, Emken et al
| First amended complaint FOR: 1) FRAUD 2) ELECTIONS FRAUD 3) NEGLIGENCE 4) BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY 5) NEGLIGENCE 6) DEFAMATION 7) RICO predicate crimes: FRAUD, AIDING AND ABETTING FORGERY AND FORGED DOCUMENTS TO COMMIT ELECTIONS FRAUD, RACKETEERING 8) IIED DEFAMATION OF CHARACTER 7TH AMENDEMENT JURY REQUESTED (CASE REMOVED FROM THE
|
| Keith Judd, Orly Taitz, Thomas G. MacLeran, Leah Lax, David Farrar Larry Rappaport, Lucien Vita, Carol Vita Plaintiffs; |
| v. BARACK OBAMA , IN HIS CAPACITY AS A CANDIDATE ON THE BALLOT FOR THE US PRESIDENT IN 2012 ELECTION NATALIE E. TENNANT, in her capacity of West Virginia Secretary of State; DEBRA BOWEN, in her capacity of California Secretary of State; |
| BRIAN P. KEMP, in his capacity of Georgia Secretary of State; WILLIAM M. GARDNER, in his capacity of New Hampshire Secretary of State; NANCY PELOSI in her capacity of the Chairwoman of the 2008 Democratic National Convention and Signor of the Certificate of Nomination for Candidate for President Obama; MICHAEL ASTRUE in his capacity as the Commissioner of SSA; WILLIAM A. CHATFIELD In his capacity as former Director of the Selective Service; ALVIN ONAKA in his capacity as registrar of the Health Department of Hawaii; JANET NAPOLITANO in her capacity as Secretary of Department of Homeland Security; ERIC HOLDER in his capacity as Attorney General of the USA; BRIAN SCHATZ in his capacity as 2008 Chairman of the Democratic party of Hawaii and Signor of the Certificate for Presidency for Barack Obama; LYNN MATUSOW in her capacity as 2008 Secretary of the Democratic party of Hawaii and Signor of the Certificate for Presidency for Barack Obama ALICE TRAVIS GERMOND in her capacity as a secretary of the 2008 Democratic Nominating Convention; OBAMA FOR AMERICA; BALLOT LAW COMMISSION OF STATE OF HEW HAMPSHIRE; BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF CALIFORNIA REPUBLICAN |
| PARTY; DEAN C. LOGAN in his capacity as Los Angeles county registrar, ELIZABETH EMKEN in her capacity as a candidate on the ballot; DIANNE FEINSTEIN in her capacity as a candidate on the ballot; CLAY D. LAND in his capacity as a Federal Judge, Central District of Georgia; JOHN AVLON, in his capacity as a reporter for Daily Beast; CHRIS MATTHEWS in his capacity as a host of MSNBC; MSNBC FORBES MAGAZINE; KEVIN UNDERHILL in his capacity as a reporter for FORBES MAGAZINE; CLEARCHANNELCOMMUNICATIONS; KFI AM 640; JOHN AND KEN SHOW; JOHN KOBELT; PATRICK R. DONAHOE in his capacity as Post Master General and Chief Executive Officer of United States Postal Service; CNN; JOHN DOES and JANE DOES 1-100; Defendants |
INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF THE CASE
In the past 20 years or so the concentration of power in the United States of America obliterated delineation between the three once independent branches of the U.S. Government. Additionally, U.S. establishment and centralized media, which often referred to as the fourth branch of the government, became one monolithic conglomerate.
A vicious circle of corruption and fraud threatens the future of this once Constitutional Republic. Massive elections fraud, which is being reported by whistle blowers is allowed to fester, as all three branches of government and controlled lap dog media turn a blind eye, as whistleblowers and political dissidents are being ignored at best or viciously persecuted, harassed, impoverished, slandered and defamed at worst. Elected officials and some elected judges, who are the direct product and beneficiaries of the elections fraud, refuse to address it. High ranking state and federal officials and some appointed judges, refuse to address elections fraud on the merits on the merits, refuse to prosecute and eliminate such fraud.
This creates a pattern of racketeering and flagrant, repeated, willful and malicious violation of the Constitutional and civil rights of
the U.S. citizens, as they are being denied the most basic civil and human right of free and lawful elections.
The case at hand deals with such massive elections fraud, racketeering and violations of civil rights in the highest positions of power in the U.S. The plaintiffs herein can only hope and pray that this court will show integrity and will be true to its' oath of office to protect and defend the Constitution against all enemies: foreign and domestic. A copy of this complaint is being forwarded to the civil rights commission of the Department of justice, Inspector General of the Department of Justice, Public Integrity Unit of the Department of Justice, House of Representatives Oversight committee, Judiciary Committee, Elections subcommittee, Civil Rights Commission of the United Nations, International Criminal Bar Panel in Hague, Inter-American commission for Human Rights as well as Domestic and International media.
A big part of this complaint relates to the fact that Barack Hussein Obama, who is occupying the position of the U.S. President and Commander in Chief of the U.S. military and who is currently running for the position of the U.S. President in the 2012 election, is doing so by fraud, while using forged and fraudulently obtained identification papers.
Forgery includes Obama's birth certificate, Selective Service Certificate (registration for the military) as well as flagrantly stolen
Connecticut Social Security number, which is being used by Obama even today, while in the White House, while both official verification agencies E-Verify and SSNVS show that this number was never assigned to Obama. His legal name is unknown, as in his school records in Indonesia he is listed under the last name Soetoro and in his mother's passport records he was listed under the last name Obama Soebarkah. His citizenship in his school records in Indonesia is listed as Indonesian and there is no record of it ever being changed to American.
Additionally, school and other records and dated photographs show multiple inconsistencies in Obama's reported biography. Most flagrant is existence of two parallel records of a boy by name Barry Obama residing in the U.S. between 1967 and 1969 and attending school in Honolulu Hawaii and a boy by name Barry Soetoro residing in Jakarta Indonesia during the same period of time of 1967-1969. We have a record of Barry Obama travelling to Indonesia with his mother and step father Lolo Soetoro, but we have no idea which one of these two boys returned back to the United States. We do not know, whether the boy, who returned to the U.S. is Barry Obama or Barry Soetoro.
Similarly, Student Clearing House shows Obama attending Columbia University for 9 months only. It is not clear how did he even get a degree from Columbia with only 9 month of attendance and more importantly, it is not clear where was Obama or Soetoro or Soebarkah or (whatever his name is) during June 1981-September 1982, when he claimed to be at Columbia, but was not there according to his school records.
It is not known what kind of training did he receive during this time, as it is known that Obama travelled to Pakistan prior to his commencement of studies at Columbia. It is not clear what name and what passport did he use for his travel. Lastly, in his school records from Indonesia he is listed as an Indonesian citizen, which of course disqualifies him from the position f the U.S. President and makes him liable for massive elections fraud for getting in the White House and currently on the ballot for the second time, while being ineligible and while using all forged and fraudulently obtained identification papers. Complaint at hand also brings forward allegations against high ranking governmental officials and members of the media, who were criminally complicit in aiding and abetting fraud committed by Obama and who acted in concert and in a form of a racketeering scheme.
Additionally, complaint at hand deals with invalid voter registrations. Latest Pew research shows that 24 million voter registrations are either flagrantly invalid or contain serious inaccuracies. It appears that a large number of these invalid voter registrations are in California. Individuals who control these bogus registrations, control the elections.
This situation is aggravated by the fact that most of elections software and hardware is concentrated in the hands of a couple of
foreign corporations, which are not subject to the U.S. laws, the citizens are denied access to the programming codes of the elections machines and ballot counting machines under the excuse of proprietary rights. All evidence of lack of reliability of electronic ballot counting scanners was previously ignored by the courts. This complaint also represents an elections challenge due to multiple violations of Section 303 (a) of the Help America Vote Act (“HAVA”), 42 U.S.C. 15483(a), and Section 8 of the National Voter Registration ACT (“NVRA”) and California Elections Code section 1250 a(5). In particular, in the state of California primary 2012 CA thousands of invalid votes were registered, while in fact those votes were invalid and were cast pursuant to invalid voter registration. Those individuals were registered as voters in violation of CA Elections code 2150, as well as National Voter Registration Act and Help America Vote act.
All of these acts demand specific information for a valid voter registration: birth date, country of origin, prior voter registration, driver’s license, four last digits of the Social Security number or a special assigned number and so on. Over 746,000 registrations were invalid due to lack of required information, over 300,000 are suspicious registration which are either duplicate or registrations of deceased individuals or registrations missing required information or are registrations of non-residents. Plaintiffs found in the databases individuals who are 150 years old, 200 years old, who are dutifully voting in each election.
When Registrars were asked about this occurrence, a number of employees of the offices of Registrars responded in e-mails, in writing, as well as in phone conversations, that the birth dates were fabricated, namely, when the birth dates were missing, they simply posted a made up birth date of a year of 1900 or 1850.
While currently registrars get information from some mortuaries in regards to deceased individuals, such reporting was not done previously and consequently toe voter rolls are believed to contain thousands of registrations of deceased individuals. Plaintiff Taitz resided in CA for 25 years and she does not recall the state of CA ever conducting a campaign of updating the voter rolls or a campaign of making them compliant. Plaintiffs provide as an exhibit a CA voter CD received by Plaintiff Taitz from the Secretary of State, which contains over a million of either invalid or suspicious voter registrations.
There are some eight parameters which have to be satisfied for the voter registration to be valid. A check of only one parameter, country of origin, which has to be filled out according to CA elections code 1250-1252 shows over 746,000 invalid registrations, which exceeds 458,832 votes difference between Republican Candidate for the U.S. Senate Orly Taitz and Republican candidate Emken, who together with the Democrat Feinstein proceeded to the General election in the new top two primary.
Since the number of invalid voter registrations is enormous and exceeds the margin of victory, invalidations of the results is mandatory and the revote is needed after the voter rolls are purged from the invalid voter registrations and prior to the general election. Plaintiffs are seeking declaratory and injunctive relief for removal and de-certification of all and any votes obtained by Obama in 2012 Primary election and for preventing the Secretary of State of California and the elections commission from placing Obama’s name on the ballot in the 2012 General election due to the fact that Obama is not constitutionally eligible and submitted his candidacy based on fraud and use of forged and fraudulently obtained identification papers.
Plaintiffs are also seeking de-certification of the results of 2012 CA primary election for the U.S. Senate, purging the databases of all invalid voter registrations prior to 2012 General election and holding a re-vote of the CA senate primary prior to conducting CA 2012 U.S. Senate General election. Plaintiffs are seeking a Declaratory Relief declaring Plaintiff Judd a winner of WV Democratic Primary election due to fraud and lack of eligibility of Candidate Obama, who was declared the winner of WV Democratic Primary election.
1 comment:
Boy, that's one big pile of crazy.
Post a Comment