Paul,
I know there are suits pending regarding the lost pensions of the non-union employees because I heard the interview with the attorney for the plaintiffs. I believe there are additional lawsuits on the improper rejections of profitable dealerships, and the unprecedented violations of the rights of the bondholders. It is possible that the whole thing will unravel – another mess created by Obama which will take years to clean up, with no way to undo most of the damage caused by his outrageous violations of the rule of law.
I just cannot understand why the people in positions to stop Obama before the last election could not see this coming. I knew that this was exactly what we could expect of Obama if he was not stopped. It was perfectly clear that he was a Communist. Read “Mao: The Untold Story” and it will tell you exactly what a Communist will do once gaining power.
Obama is following the playbook to a T. If he can get re-elected, the next phase will be even more ugly, with death camps a very real possibility. He is on a path of destruction that will be unstoppable if he is allowed to have another term. Yet our fearless congressmen and Supreme Court justices let the constitutional violations, occurring almost on a daily basis, just keep rolling on.
Everything about the Obama administration just makes me sick and disgusted. Even more sickening is that all my friends and relatives who ridiculed me for raising alarms about Obama (including both his Communist ideology and his fraudulent constitutional eligibility credentials) will not admit they made a mistake.
I never thought this could happen in our country. Now Bill Clinton is telling us we should “keep Obama on the job”! That man should be in prison if not in front of a firing squad for his many crimes. He has absolutely no shame. I could not show my face in public if I had a history like his, Including multiple conspiracies to commit murder.
DL
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2012 9:19 PM
Subject: Re: Law Prof: US Govt Ignoring Rule of Law & Harming Economy Further
David:
What is the current status of the Chrysler bankruptcy case? Is it still alive?
Paul
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2012 10:04 PM
Subject: Law Prof: US Govt Ignoring Rule of Law & Harming Economy Further
This is a very interesting interview with University of Pennsylvania law professor David Skeel regarding the dangers to the nation resulting from a growing pattern of Executive Branch actions which depart from the rule of law.
He offers the opinion that the current problems started with the Bear Stearns bail-out, but I believe the problems go back at least to 1913 with the fraudulent ratification of the 16th and 17th amendments to the Constitution, and the adoption of the unconstitutional Federal Reserve Act.
In any case, Professor Skeel asserts that it is the job of the courts to enforce the rule of law. The failure of the Supreme Court to overturn the illegal Chrysler bankruptcy was a disturbing indication that the courts do not have the resolve needed to block Executive Branch actions that violate the rule of law.
Is that an understatement or what?
_____________________________________________________________________________
Note: There were numerous violations of the rule of law in the Chrysler bankruptcy, including politically-driven dealer rejections (rejected dealerships were almost exclusively owned by Republicans); disparate treatment of the pensions of union vs. non-union employees (Chrysler unions had close ties to the Obama administration); and gross violations of the rights of bondholders in order to fund protections for union pensions and health care benefits of union retirees. In effect, the Chrysler bondholders were stripped of their claims on Chrysler assets, in violation of the bond covenants, in order to pay off the unions.
A recent interview on Fox News with an attorney for the non-union employees, including former management employees, who lost their pensions in the strange and unorthodox Chrysler bankruptcy suggested that the final resolution of the Chrysler bankruptcy engineered by the Obama administration may not survive a coming legal challenge.
Chrysler Bankruptcy, case of judicial fraud? Dealership Attorneys to appeal Motion denial
Public Docket For Chrysler Bankruptcy Has Been Sabotaged To Conceal The Fraudulent Dealer Rejection Opinion by Judge Gonzalez.
5 comments:
Maybe the law Professor doesn't see the forest thru the trees!
This is a Corporation and it appears ONLY the Government can shut down a Corporation, yet THE UNITED STATES is a corporation and why would it harm itself?
It also appears the rest of those that want Sovereignty want to comply with the Rule of Law and NOT JUST SHUT DOWN - THE UNITED STATES, INC.!
The Federal Reserve, a PRIVATE corporation, can give away OUR TAX DOLLARS, yet those companies listed can declare Bankruptcy by a Cabal Judge even though they paid NOTHING in return for those funds!
First Audit Results In Federal Reserve's 100 Yr History; Startling! $16 Trillion given away!
http://nesaranews.blogspot.com/2012/09/first-audit-results-in-federal-reserves.html
Citigroup: $2.5 Trillion ($2,500,000,000,000)
Morgan Stanley: $2.04 Trillion ($2,040,000,000,000)
Merrill Lynch: $1.949 Trillion ($1,949,000,000,000)
Bank of America: $1.344 Trillion ($1,344,000,000,000)
...
Please sell your home, live on the street, and give that money to these corporations so they CAN Survive!
Those CEOs need to Survive on $10,000,000 (Million) a year salaries!
Yes...yes...in the sovereign community the gurus taught that after the Federal Reserve was in place, they needed a case support and enforce the change.
Wikipedia mentions:
Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64 (1938), is a landmark[1] decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court held that federal courts did not have the judicial power to create general federal common law when hearing state law claims under diversity jurisdiction. In reaching this holding, the Court overturned almost a century of federal civil procedure case law, and established the foundation of what remains the modern law of diversity jurisdiction as it applies to United States federal courts.
The recent Citizens United stating corporations are persons may end up playing in our favor, when the end of the Fed (where the living were made corporations on paper) are no longer deceived by that activity, and when we separate the living People from the paper corporate Persons, the way the laws effect a corporation may actually restore that rule of law for the sovereign people.
Don't run from the word sovereign. It's by design that the 'other side' put people in our mix to mess with it's meaning and to confuse it's power.
There is no such thing as a sovereign citizen, because a citizen by definition is under someone's control and a sovereign by definition controls their own moves and actions according to their conscience, so the two words cancel out each other.
A sovereign would not 'register' for anything including to vote, nor will a sovereign pledge allegiance to anything, nor will they get upset if others who are sovereign aren't citizens of a corporation.
Sovereigns move about in a supreme manner not trespassing on rights and respecting the rights of others to be 'free' to move about without the oppressive control of 'so called leaders'.
A sovereign is their own leader so they would not be part of a system that elects someone to 'tell them what they can and cannot do'.
We have more people who are citizens by choice and are controlled by choice and participate in the system by choice that they don't see it is by their own will that they experience what they do.
They are awake and stagnant.
You are either part of a system of control or you are sovereign.
No divided houses here.
Feel free to check your self on the inside for the answers for you.
I do not speak for anyone else but me and do not expect anyone else to accept what I've stated, so call it an opinion and do what you will.
No additional responses will come.
I don't know how those Sovereign people survive, but I think Drake thinks you can have a SSN and still be Sovereign.
However, there are many that are Non Tax Payers that claim to be Sovereign, and I know of one person who is and helps people with their taxes, yet he demands you send him a Money Order, as Checks or Credit is no good, or else that is one way to keep records from the IRS to be Sovereign!
Anon 11:32 AM here
I did not collapse the SSN trust. I think when they set up the Federal Reserve and took away our rights to property, they still keep track of what we 'could have owned/should have owned/was confiscated from our ancestors' in that SSN trust. I can't prove anything. No one told me anything. It's just how I feel inside, so maybe that's the reality I'm creating for 'me'.
But without knowing who your ancestors were, they could not keep track of the value confiscated, so maybe that's when the birth certificates came in, can't prove a thing..just my thinking cap came up with that imaginative thought. If they also seeded those certificates with an original value and traded them, maybe that's how they would have to collapse those certificates and return the value thereof to the rightful owner.
If you pull a certificate, the money comes out the market, so maybe we would see it as a market collapse when as henegan kept saying a repatriation of assets is occurring. To us it would seem like a collapse when it could really be unlocking and collapsing all the encumberances holding our wealth in the trusts controlled by the bankers.
IRS is a difficult beast. You can tell them the truth, and their agents, ill trained, in some power trip, or under the control of a rogue supervisor, will still come after you for various reasons.
I would not suggest anyone tackle them on your turf until you have enough information about who you are, AND you know how to invalidate any contract you are forced to enter at the time of contract creation.
SSN was created in my youth, but I know how to invalidate any contract I am forced to enter into under duress or under coercion (I do own a legal dictionary, too).
Their system knows you are sovereign, but they don't always follow their own rules, so even if you are in a particular database with a particular status, that doesn't mean Joe Cop, or Jonathan IRS agent will take the time to look.
Just like every cop assumes everyone has a driver's license and is therefore a driver, every IRS agent assumes everyone is a taxpayer.
If Joe cop knew the truth, he, his wife, their kids, and all his family would not have a driver's license, and if the IRS agent knew the truth, even if they had to pay as an employee of the corporation, their wife, kids, relatives, and friends would know what to do to not pay.
I don't try to tell anyone how to deal with the IRS because if it works for one, you don't get the same agent, and you don't get the same office location, Kansas, California, Utah, Texas, and more places.
They are bold enough to tell you they plan to take away your 'Right to Property'.
Say What?
In a constitutional government that would be an economic threat.
IF they get you to pay them from some bogus lien they put on you, their monthly statement is bold enough to call it 'Your Agreement'.
First you decide you are Sovereign, YOU get to decide that of your free will.
Then you unlock all the contracts that kept you from moving freely as a sovereign.
any new contract that asks if you are a citizen, you say no.
By right of birth, you were born in a territory called a state, and they don't ask if you are a citizen of that state...they know you have a right to be there.
The state came first before federal, so federal only gets rights the state gives.
A state would not exist if it weren't for people being born in the territorial boundaries.
So people are sovereign and give the state it's rights.
You go back to the beginning and learn it fresh like you were just born, and you can see the Matrix.
Hard to wake up older people...kids pick it up quickly.
The matrix movie alluded to it being easier to show someone young (being molded) that old (Set in their ways)
Anon 11:32 AM again, with an pondering imagination.
If our assets are tied to the SSN trust, it may be that when people file bankruptcy they don't collapse the trust but they call in the assets (not sure how long a bankruptcy takes from start to finish, but certificates and collaterized assets are 3M, 6M, 9M, 1yr, 3yr, 5yr, etc). If they have to call in the assets to liquidate the one filing, the creditor (pretend creditors) probably divy it up among their selves leaving the one who filed the bankruptcy without anything. SSN need bullets? For something not yet revealed?
There are some People who are awake (or claim to be and that's their right to make their claim) who don't want someone to worship a rock or anything else, use a symbol, or be a member of an organization, or have markings, or wear certain things, or believe certain things, or live in certain places. They claim (their right to claim) to have all these ideas of how things should be for their life, what is life, what can be used for life, etc.. yet they also want to push those ideas on others, (call it their mission or missionary, doesn't matter).
They will need re-education.
'know thyself'. Temet nosce
This system is ours. We created it. From us to our ancestors way back to us right now.
What we accept as our reality, collectively this system reflects back to us and we experience.
If only business travelers used airports and only they got felt on by TSA, it would not exist because airlines exist for revenue, and businesses need people to travel and if employees won't take travel jobs because of TSA. Business would complain and not spend on travel because no one applied for the job. If personal travelers know they are going to get felt on and purchase a ticket for the 'event' and take their family along too, then their money supports the activity...they are paying the TSA to feel on them!
You have a right to travel, but travel by airline is not a birth right, it's a privilege.
That's why the school system want our youth, they have all those hours and days to teach them 'their way'.
Many are awake yet the system will tell you what the problem is and show you solutions that won't work and the consequences of attempting to use those solutions. (ie arresting a guy for capturing rain water; stopping a man from selling raw milk, stopping a woman from growing a garden on her property as landscape)
The goal is to get many to assume, there is nothing we can do.
Yes there is. Take TSA. The loss of revenue from a "collective rejection" of the back-of-the-bus oppression, went away.
If it's not business related, where the business contract obligations require you to use that mode of transportation, (no law impairing the obligations of contracts shall be made); then delay your airline trip until TSA goes away, travel a different way, meet your connections half way via another mode of transport, there's a lot of ways to do things but people won't be inconvenienced long enough to effect change in their world.
If you signed up to be a citizen (registered - answer yes when asked verbally or on forms), then their system has rules that you better act like one. (Do the robot!)
If you are registered in a system where someone (anonymous to you but you trust them and elect them to make decisions for you) can pay someone else to put on a costume (I mean uniform) and tell you what to do, then you better to what the costumed crusader (I mean uniformed authority) told you to do because he works for someone (anonymous to you but you trust them with your life and your family's life) who told him what he can and cannot do to you - and you registered for the system to participate.
Know thyself.
What defines you that you want everybody in the world to have the same restrictions, religion, beliefs, values? Why?
Get back to imagination, exercise the right side of the brain. What is your reality?
You have you to thank for what you create.
Post a Comment