Wednesday, August 7, 2013

Eco-couple told to pull down their 'hobbit home' made entirely out of natural materials . . . but without planning permission

Eco-couple told to pull down their 'hobbit home' made entirely out of natural materials . . . but without planning permission

  • Family of three is made homeless by planning inspector's decision
  • They built their home from scratch, but have been ordered to tear it down
  • The couple admit they built it without first getting planning permission
  • Their labour of love was branded 'harmful' to the countryside
Homeless: Charlie Hague and Megan Williams, with their only child Eli, have been left homeless by Pembrokeshire County Council's demolition order
Homeless: Charlie Hague and Megan Williams, with their only child Eli, have been left homeless
A young couple have been left heartbroken after planners ordered their unique 'hobbit home' to be bulldozed, effectively leaving them homeless.
Charlie Hague and Megan Williams, both 25, built the roundhouse from scratch with their own hands, using only natural materials.
But the couple lost their appeal today against a planning enforcement notice telling them to tear their pride and joy home down.
Charlie and Megan, who have a one-year-old son Eli, built the house on private land in Glandwr, North Pembrokeshire, last summer.
Locals nicknamed it the hobbit home, although most people did not even know it was there because it is so secluded.
But Pembrokeshire County Council ordered the couple to demolish their home because it was built without planning permission.
Charlie and Megan, who live a self-sufficient lifestyle, fought the decision claiming it had a low impact on the environment because of its unique construction.
Charlie, a sculptor and woodworker, said: 'We built this house to provide our son with a healthy environment to grow up in. 
'We were born in the area, went to school here, and have lived here all our lives. We wouldn’t want to be anywhere else.'
The pair acknowledged their property was built without prior consent but said there was no other way for them to afford their own home. 
Megan said: 'I know it’s not a possibility for everyone, and our situation here is unique, but if young people are to live and work in the area they need somewhere to live.'
 
The couple’s appeal was dismissed by planning inspector Iwan Lloyd, who ruled the development harmed the character and appearance of the countryside.
The inspector upheld the council’s enforcement notice, which requires the roundhouse and all associated work, including the timber decking, be demolished.
Middle Earth: Charlie Hague and Megan Williams' home has been compared to a hobbit's. But the couple have been ordered to tear their idyllic dwelling down by a killjoy council
Middle Earth: Charlie Hague and Megan Williams' home has been compared to a hobbit's. The couple have been ordered to tear their idyllic dwelling down
Hobbits: The three-foot tall manlike creatures were made famous in JRR Tolkein's The Hobbit and Lord of the Rings books. Picture here, Martin Freeman as Bilbo Baggins in The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey
Hobbits: The three-foot tall manlike creatures were made famous in JRR Tolkein's The Hobbit and Lord of the Rings books. Picture here, Martin Freeman as Bilbo Baggins in The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey
The order gives the couple two months to return the land to its previous condition.
Mr Lloyd’s report stated: 'The character and appearance of the countryside should be protected for its intrinsic sake.
'The benefits of a low-impact development do not outweigh the harm to the character and appearance of the countryside.'
Friends said the couple were half expecting their appeal to be turned down but were still 'devastated' by the decision.
Unique: The couple's front room, complete. They started building their house using only naturally resourced materials last year
Unique: The couple's front room, complete. They started building their house using only naturally resourced materials last year
Treebeard: The couple have used a whole tree as a supporting structure for their home, fondly nicknamed the 'hobbit house' by locals
Treebeard: The couple have used a whole tree as a supporting structure for their home, fondly nicknamed the 'hobbit house' by locals
Killjoy council: The couple have been unable to convince the authorities to let them keep their unique home
Killjoy council: The couple have been unable to convince the authorities of the merits of their eco friendly house
One friend said: 'They are heartbroken - the roundhouse is a thing of great beauty which they put their hearts and souls into.
'They are a young couple who should be applauded for solving their own housing issues by creating a sustainable home out of local materials.
'Instead they are now facing the prospect of watching it being razed to the ground.'
The couple have one last chance - they have applied for retrospective planning permission but their friends said they feared it was a lost cause.
Darkness falls: The lights will go out on the couple's home for good unless they can overturn the Planning Inspectorate's decision
Darkness falls: The lights will go out on the couple's home for good unless they can overturn the Planning Inspectorate's decision


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2382684/Charlie-Hague-Megan-Williams-told-pull-hobbit-home-entirely-natural-materials.html#ixzz2bJrDnN9l
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

8 comments:

Anonymous said...

The only reason the "officials" are doing this is because they didn't get their "cut", they don't care about the "countryside appearance" or any crap like that, they want the money the permits needed to built the house would have generated and they are willing to left this family homeless because this couple didn't have the money to pay for it. Sad!

gary said...

Pathetic, they have no right

Anonymous said...

present U.C.C. 2012127914, 2013032035, 2012086802

= to the purported / alleged 'officials' =

= ABSOLUTE DATA RECONCILED =

......love, Ed = hold the vibe.....

Anonymous said...

It is very sad indeed when they appear to care more about nature than people. What a lovely family. They should be made to give them a nice house for free without taxes in its place if they demolish it.

Anonymous said...

I'll be so freaking glad when all these control-freak bureaucrats are stripped of their power. They will all probably lose their minds because they can no longer control people. Most are a bunch of bullies who really get off on messing with people.

Anonymous said...

Seriously! Why the Hell don't the townspeople who "affectionately" named it the hobbit house come to the defense of this creative young couple? And fine the "officials" for obstructing the pursuit of happiness??? What's wrong with this screwed up town? Everything!

Anonymous said...

oh God! you know what's going to happen if they do that, instead of demolishing the house on Wednesday they will do it on Monday just to teach them a lesson and make an example out of them. Sorry but the ABSOLUTE DATA that Heather and the OPPT is promoting is not saving anybody,because Administrative remedies have no enforcement. (8 months later Heather has not been able to provide any funds for anybody and she has been changing the story as she goes) what this town needs to do is band together and demand this people be left alone.

Anonymous said...

Really?
Aren't these merely questions of our state of mind (such as who we think we are) as well as our competency to do the paperwork for our commercial claims? Who here believes we need permission, from our own public servants, to build our own private home on our own private property or land that we have staked a claim on?

And after our home is built; do we have a commercial claim for our property, our labor, improvements and materials?
And have we taken the proper precautions to REGISTER our claim into the public by way of generally accepted, commercial, procedures and forms?

Who do we think we are? Such as an original, state, citizen in control of his own affairs versus a US subject-citizen of a federal corporation.
And what are the jurisdictional implications of these many issues and entities?
And what would be our DAMAGE claim if our property, our labor, or our materials are damaged, or destroyed, under COLOR of law?

Think about it.
Figure out what the mistakes, assumptions, and presumptions are.
Then consider a non pro tunc over the entire thing.

}:>