Thursday, September 5, 2013

PUTIN BLOWS THE COVER OFF THE LIES AND WAR CRIMES COMMITTED BY THE CRIMINAL CABAL RUNNING WASHINGTON DC'S CRIMES

PUTIN BLOWS THE COVER OFF THE LIES AND WAR CRIMES COMMITTED BY THE CRIMINAL CABAL RUNNING WASHINGTON DC'S CRIMES

Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 2:55 AM
Putin Puts Obama in Hot Seat: ‘What Will You Do If Rebels Are Ones Using Chemical Weapons?’




Putin Puts Obama in Hot Seat: ‘What Will You Do If Rebels Are Ones Using Chemical Weapons?’   

Russian President Vladimir Putin has a strange way of speaking straightforwardly, without all the artificial and “morally superior” airs one expects from Western politicians.
Putin to Obama: What will you do if it turns out that the armed rebels are the ones who used weapons of mass destruction?
Earlier, for example, he
wondered why Western leaders were supporting cannibals in Syria:
You will not deny that one does not really need to support the people who not only kill their enemies, but open up their bodies, eat their intestines in front of the public and cameras. Are these the people you want to support? Is it them who you want to supply with weapons? Then this probably has little relation to humanitarian values that have been preached in Europe for hundreds of years.
Putin was referring to the notorious video of a jihadi leader biting into the organs of a Syrian soldier while screaming Islamic slogans.
Now, the straightforward Russian has asked another equally important and straightforward question — the sort of question so full of common sense that most Western politicians never expect to hear a fellow politician asking (and, as usual, one the Western media have failed to report on, though Arabic media is abuzz with it).
In a videotaped interview published today concerning U.S. attempts to go to war in Syria, not only did Putin criticize Secretary of State John Kerry’s
 dissembling concerning the nature of the Syrian opposition,
 but he also said:
There is another question: if it turns out that the armed rebels are the ones who used weapons of mass destruction, what will the United States do with the armed rebels?  And what will it do with those sponsoring the rebels? Will they stop supplying them with arms? Will they start fighting against them?
Indeed.  Considering that invading Syria is almost entirely being rationalized in the context of Assad violating the human rights of others, what will the U.S. — Obama, Kerry, McCain, et. al. — do if it turns out that the al-Qaeda led rebels are, in fact, the ones using such weapons, as significant evidence already indicates?
Probably what they are doing now: continue misleading Americans and go to war anyway, since — and once again — this has nothing to do with chemical weapons.


4 comments:

Anonymous said...

Putin for President! We need the Russians to do a 'Red Dawn' on D.C. and put Putin in there! Pretty sad when the best man for the job is the Russian premier!

Anonymous said...

We like Putin. He's a real man who operates with integrity, and is fair and balanced in his decisions. Thank you for some honesty in this evil run world which we wish to change to the good of all men, women and children, animals, etc.

Dan said...

Pentagon knew in 2012 it would take 75,000 GROUND TROOPS to secure Syria’s chemical weapons facilities
http://www.infowars.com/revealed-pentagon-knew-in-2012-that-it-would-take-75000-ground-troops-to-secure-syrias-chemical-weapons-facilities/
Obama, Rothschilds and the Bilderberg Group are in this war to Overtake the Natural Gas in Syria and DENY anyone else from getting it to then sell it!
Syria, Pipeline Politics, OPEC & the USDollar
http://www.infowars.com/revealed-pentagon-knew-in-2012-that-it-would-take-75000-ground-troops-to-secure-syrias-chemical-weapons-facilities/

Dan said...

Syria, Pipeline Politics, OPEC & the USDollar
http://nesaranews.blogspot.com/2013/09/syria-pipeline-politics-opec-usdollar.html