Monday, April 25, 2016

Judge Anna: Open Letter to Sheriff Ward


A MUST READ for EVERY American - the TRUTH about the 'courts,' the 'attorneys', the 'BAR Assn,' the IRS and MORE



An Open Letter to Sheriff Ward of Harney County Oregon and to All County Sheriffs in America from Judge Anna 

Dear Sheriff Ward,  

I am writing to you today to ascertain your office and position with respect to the Hammonds and the developing situation at the Bundy Ranch with respect to "Federal Officers".

My name is Anna Maria Riezinger, also known as Anna von Reitz because my actual name is German and a mile long. I am an American Common Law Superior Court Judge in Alaska where operation of the Seventh Amendment Courts started up again in conjunction with the Common Law Grand Juries more than a year ago, and I also serve as a Federal Postal District Court Judge for the Western Region.

As you can clearly see by reading the Seventh Amendment, all matters pertaining to living people and their property must be addressed to Common Law Courts. How, then, are the Hammonds being addressed by federal admiralty courts?

The answer lies in the past.

During the Civil War, the normal court system owed the people in the South shutdown and did not immediately reopen. Commanders in the military districts in ten states appointed civilian tribunals to function under "Special Admiralty"----- a euphemism.  

For the purposes of these military tribunals, people and property could be addressed in an arbitrary fashion without regard for the Law of the Land. This was very convenient for the administrators and very unfortunate for the people. 

In 1866 the Supreme Court addressed the situation in Milligan Ex Parte and decided that so long as the American Common Law Courts were running, there was no excuse for the use of any form of martial law.

Be advised that the American Common Law Courts are up and running but both the military administrators and the judges and, most particularly,  the Bar Associations had a taste of arbitrary power and the bit in their teeth back then---and a concerted effort to shut the Common Law Courts down began, so as to usurp their jurisdiction and "move the venue" of the local courts off the land and into the international jurisdiction of martial law and the sea where power could be exerted against the people and their assets on the land in a comparatively arbitrary fashion. 

By 1965 the rats had achieved their ends and almost all Common Law Courts in America were either shut down or functioning with only two offices--- justice of the peace and notary publics.  This allowed the members of the Bar  Associations to impose admiralty law on the people and to avoid the guarantees of The Constitution.  

The use of "Special Admiralty" in a court room is signified by the heavy gold fringe on the flag.  A word here about the Bar Associations and some facts about the ABA that deserve to be far more widely known, also some information about the current Court System that you probably don't know:

The American Bar Association is an offshoot of the London Lawyer's Guild, an avowed Communist organization. The American Bar Association and the IRS are both owned and operated by Northern Trust, Inc. They are private, foreign debt collection agencies, not units of government, not “professional associations", and certainly not "non-profit organizations". 

As an organization representing a foreign (British) government, the Bar Associations are only allowed to function here via a Treaty (the last one in 1947) that they have abundantly violated. Their members are required to present Foreign Agent Statements as part of their credentials in open court, which they hardly ever do.

As a result of their misdeeds and usurpation against the Law of the Land and the people and their violations of both their corporate charter and their Treaty, a commercial obligation lien of $279 trillion dollars has been assessed against the American Bar Association, the International Bar Association, and the "US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE"---- which, it turns out, is just another private subcontractor performing "governmental services" and doing a criminally bad job of it.

The "US District Courts" are also private for-hire subcontractors that run all the related courts in their districts. Please see Title 28, Sections 80 to 131. All these "State" Courts and "County" Courts are being run as franchises of the "US District Court"--- and they are all private corporate institutions having no public office or function at all, and being related to the actual state and county only insomuch as they are operating within the geographical boundaries of a state and a county. This can be readily proven by looking up the Dun and Bradstreet Numbers, CAGE numbers, and corporate filings of these organizations. And, as was recently demonstrated by the Lufkin Case in Texas, neither the "US District Court" nor its "State" and "County" affiliates have any authority to collect debts outside the ten square miles of the District of Columbia.

We should also clear up another misunderstanding.  Back in 1864, the "United States Congress," acting as a Board of Directors for The United States of America, Inc., changed the meaning of several words by executive fiat without telling the rest of us. For their purposes and from June 30, 1864 onward, the words "state" and "State" and "United States" are code for "District of Columbia Municipal Corporation".  Thus, instead of "US District Court," you should be reading "District of Columbia Municipal Corporation District Court" and the "Idaho State Supreme Court," for example, should be read as "Idaho District of Columbia Municipal Corporation Supreme Court".

Are you beginning to feel as if you have landed in the Land of Oz?

Yes, all this means that until you make some important  decisions, you aren't working for the people of your county as an elected public peace officer. You are working as an employee of a federal corporation franchise in a private capacity. Your election is being "interpreted" as an election to an office in a private corporation. You are presently acting as a mall cop. You have no public office, no public bond, and no public oath. If you are like most members of the "law enforcement community," you are not even licensed or bonded or insured in a private capacity by your cheapskate employers. You are working for The Man, not the people. And all this got off track 150 years ago.

So all those "federal agents" who are harassing the Hammonds and who are offering to arrest them and transport them to a private prison facility? They are private corporate employees of a franchise or subcontractor of the District of Columbia Municipal Corporation having no more authority than a floorwalker at JC PENNY, despite their pretensions otherwise. They are misinformed as to their authority and also misinformed regarding the identity of the Hammonds.

These "federal agents" are literally foreign with respect to the Hammonds and have no jurisdiction related to them at all. As part of the overall outrageous circumstance and fraud scheme the members of the American Bar Association have also contrived to change the citizenship of American State Citizens---- people born on the land of the Continental United States like the Hammonds have been "kidnapped on paper" and their civil records have been falsified--- which is in violation of international law, the Law of War, and the United Nation's Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which both the Federal United States and the British Government have signed.

An examination of the paperwork will reveal that virtually every single American State Citizen has been deemed a "foundling" and ward of the state, the unwanted child of an unwed mother---- almost 400 million of us, and not a Daddy to be found? This is the result of a systematic and repugnant scheme by  international commercial banks and the ABA and, again, all serving to change the natural venue on the land to a court venue in the international jurisdiction of the sea.

The fact is that although human slavery has been outlawed worldwide since 1926, it is not against the law to enslave a corporation. So what have the criminals among us contrived to do? To "redefine" living people as corporations ---- specifically as foreign situs trusts doing business under names styled like this: John Quincy Adams, and ESTATE trusts operating under names styled like this: JOHN QUINCY ADAMS, and now, most recently, Puerto Rican public transmitting utilities styled like this: JOHN Q. ADAMS.

Look at the paperwork in your hands seemingly addressed to the Hammonds. Depending on the style used to write their names, you can tell whether the documents are addressed to foreign situs trusts owned and operated by the "State of Oregon, Inc." , a Cestui Que Vie Estate Trust owned and operated by the "STATE OF OREGON, INC." or a public transmitting utility owned and operated by "OREGON"---- a franchise of the UN Corporation. 

Please bear in mind that these "legal fiction entities" were created without the Hammond's knowledge or permission and they are completely, 100%, the responsibility of those who created them. If the HAMMONDS referenced are ESTATE  trusts belonging to the "STATE OF OREGON," it is high time for someone who is responsible for the "STATE OF OREGON" to pay any debts related to the franchise without delay---- and without bothering the living people these franchises are named after.

It also behooves them to leave the living people and their property strictly alone and forego any pretense that the living Americans known as the Hammonds have knowingly or willingly agreed to act as Federal United States Citizens or have any agreed upon responsibility to act as "co-trustees" of the Public Charitable Trust, which they most likely don't make use of and don't even know that it exists.

Bottom line--- these "courts" and their presentments and "orders" have nothing whatsoever to do with the Hammonds as living people, nor their actual physical property assets at all. They have to do with the mis-administration of public trusts and "legal persons" operated by private, mostly foreign-owned corporations which are attempting to entrap and enslave Americans and lay false claims against their property via probate fraud, identity  theft, and coercion.

This is the kind of criminality and fraud we are dealing with Sheriff Ward and, at the end of the day, the pedal hits the metal in your office. The British Government contrived the means to "press gang" the "land assets"--- living people and their property assets--- of America into the jurisdiction of the sea during the Second World War. They enslaved us and our property assets under false pretenses and via the use of legal chicanery "for the war effort" --- and, after the war, they simply continued on with these abuses. 

You have a choice. You can continue to operate as a good little debt slave of the Queen acting on "automatic" and taking orders regardless of where those orders come from----- that is, you can act as a corporate mall cop in a private capacity and take your licks when the people catch up with you, or you can honor the truth---- that the people of your county elected you in Good Faith with the understanding that you would enforce the guarantees of The Constitution owed to them and faithfully impose the land jurisdiction of the united States of America on any British agents who put a tentacle outside their actual jurisdiction.

As a Sheriff duly elected by the people of your county and operating the land jurisdiction owed to the Continental United States, you have the authority to take your lawful Oath of Office, obtain a bond for your own security, and deputize as many men as you require to restrict the "federal agents" to their actual capacity. It is your duty to inform these foreign agents that the living people known as the Hammonds do not "reside" in any "federal territory" nor act in any capacity subject to the District of Columbia Municipal Corporation.

You also have the right to collect Bounty from the Secretary of  State and the US District Court under the terms of the 14th Amendment to cover any costs you incur as a result of having to deal with these improper demands and false claims made by their agents. If these "federal agents" persist, you have the authority to address the "US District Court" responsible and request their removal from your county. If they still won't behave and honor The Constitution and the actual limits of their own jurisdiction, you have the right and responsibility to arrest the whole kit and caboodle, just as you would arrest the keepers of a tavern operating outside the Public Law.
You also have the right and responsibility to inform the "US District Court" and their franchise affiliates operating the "State" and "County" Courts that the American Common Law Courts and Grand Juries are in operation again and any use of martial law, including "Special Admiralty," is no longer excusable.

Acting as an elected Officer of the American Common Law Court indigenous to your county, along with the justices of the peace and the notary public, it is your duty to convene the Common Law Grand Jury chosen at random from among the landowners of your county to investigate crimes, including this one against the Hammonds, and to convene a Common Law Trial Jury if necessary before the Justice of the Peace to decide any and all matters affecting the living people and actual property assets of the county on the land. If there is no one able and willing to serve as Justice of the Peace in your County, a Justice of the Peace may be appointed by any Federal Postal District Judge in your region. Contact me if you need help.
Please also know that, as the Sheriff duly elected by the people of your county, you have the authority and responsibility to demand the return of any American State Citizen being held in "federal custody" for a non-capital crime (murder or assault with a deadly weapon) within 72 hours of their arrest. So if the "federal agents" make the mistake of arresting the Hammonds under false pretenses and holding them in a private capacity, it is your right and role to present a Public Custody Order to the "US District" or other court responsible demanding that the Hammonds be released to your custody. You may then use your own discretion whether to keep them in custody or release them on parole pending final resolution of the jurisdictional complaint. 

These are matters that affect millions of people and they must be addressed openly and with determination. The British Monarch has acted in Breach of Trust against the Americans, Canadians, Australians, and others. This criminality and the resulting surreptitious use of the Americium Bar Association members as licensed privateers operating on our shores is a serious international crime which is being addressed.

The misrepresentations of Americans as "foundlings" and "bastards" resulting in them being declared wards of the corporate "state" and further  misrepresentations leading to them being declared "legally dead" are criminal acts of self-interested fraud carried out against us by avowed "allies" and "friends in perpetuity"—parties who are bound by the most solemn obligations of international trust and treaty who have abused America and Americans for their own profit.

This same pattern of lying about us and making false claims against us and seeking to "re-venue" us to foreign jurisdictions has also been attempted against our federation of nation-states as a whole.

Two weeks ago, international banks and governmental services corporations in their employ appeared before the UN Trust Committee---North America, and claimed that the States of America no longer exist. They claimed among other things that we no longer have a national currency in circulation. They claimed that all 400 million Americans had voluntarily accepted Federal United States Citizenship. They claimed that our country is "civilly dead" and "de-populated" and that there are no American State Citizens. This was, of course, done behind our backs by people representing secondary creditors of defunct federal "governmental services corporations" claiming to be the beneficiaries and/or creditors of our estates.

It's time to set the records straight and for us to act in our naked sovereign capacity. A Declaration of Joint Sovereignty was issued by lawful heirs of the National Trust(s), together with Sovereign Letters Patent in behalf of the United Colonies of America, the united States of America, and the Native American Nations and delivered to the UN Trust Committee--North America and to the UN Security Council, the Pope, the Queen, Ban Ki Moon, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the Bank of International Settlements. 

The criminals responsible for this circumstance are being recognized for who and what they are and the die is cast. We are going to get down to the bottom of this fraud and misrepresentation once and for all.

If you wish to be called "Sheriff" of a county in America, you must now step up and earn the title and begin operating the land jurisdiction owed to the Continental United States. You are under moral and lawful obligation to protect the Hammonds against any "federal agent" and to fully inform those agents of the limitations of their jurisdiction while standing on our soil.

If there is no American Common Law Court presently operating in your county, it is your duty to organize one without further delay. In most counties there are active Justices of the Peace who still perform private marriage ceremonies and public notaries are still active. You may draft your Grand Jury and, if needed, Trial Juries from among the landowners listed in the county land records. All actions of the actual County Court should be stamped in red and signed in black. All actions by admiralty courts ---by whatever name they operate under---are stamped in blue.

Sincerely,
Judge Anna Maria Riezinger


15 comments:

Anonymous said...

Part 1 of 4
Opinion, as I am not a lawyer, IANAL

Bundy/Hammonds were picked up against their free will, I wonder if they asked to see the warrant to find out who signed and and who claimed to 'own' their bodies to be delivered to some building for some cause.

They were taken to a facility against their free will. Where in any prior contracts they have, driver's license, registration of the car they were traveling in, were they giving permission to be stopped under duress and threat to their life.

They were offered to sign for bond, by someone who spoke to them, told them what they were charged with and asked them to sign that contract authenticating the charge against the, giving the signature is contract, I'm sure they know that.

If the man or woman act-ing as magistrate make the offer of the charge, and Bundy/Hammonds accepts the offer before the man or woman act-ing as magistrate withdraws the offer, a contract is formed between them.

If their contract is enforceable at law, and I would say, yes it is, because there is probably video to prove there was no gun to their head; then either can sue the other for breach and recover damages.

At the moment the offer is accepted, a contract is formed.
Both are bound by their mutual promises.

The magistrate passes their acceptance to another to try them for the charge they accepted.

If they agreed to be in bond-age (where they agree to have a price tag placed on their freedom), and enter the contract for bond-age for an amount they could not possibly afford to pay right then an there, then they'd have to enter another contract with a bail bondsman to pay for what they agreed to pay without having the money to pay as agreed.

Do you see?
They say you are doing this to you!

You on the other hand, shoot yourself in the foot, and then ask for a galactic to attack the people who were around you when you did it.

It's not gonna happen.

Anonymous said...

Part 2 of 4
This is opinion, I am not a lawyer, IANAL
It's a spiritual fact that the human race or condition ages each year but the spirit can remain at the level of a 10 yr old.

Galactics are spiritually mature, and a bunch of teenages are not going to go into a daycare and beat up kids over the claims of other kids who are participating in their own harm.

In civil law, the term is called, contributary negligence.
Bundy/Hammonds contributed to the event that give rise to their claim. (they sign the documents given to them by the people [I am certain they were not familiar to the Bundy/Hammonds] - they recognize the authority of red and blue flashing lights and costumed day workers [I am certain they were not familiar to the Bundy/Hammonds] now due to all this playing in the represented land, they gave up their own property, it's intangible, it's their freedom. It's a right they had and they negotiated it away for an amount they could not afford.

Judge Anna is pissing in the wind, and it's not getting on anyone.

All of these people who 'belong' are the ones who are agreeing to these things, and they get mad and people for refusing to belong and call them 'illegal' for having the mind to not be anyone's property and not have anyone tell them where they can and cannot go.

They get made at 'illegals' for not entering contracts that will put them into more contracts where people who are not familiar to them can control their lives.

Yes, no matter how old the physical body is, the spiritual body is still maturing and the majority, regardless of physical age, are collectively at the same spiritual level, and when they all agree to do harm, or go to war, or hate, or discriminate, it's everything their government can do, is to protect those that have grown spiritually and show they are spiritually mature because they don't have to kill, cause harm to another, seek the demise of another, to resolve a conflict.

It's the Bundy/Hammonds own fault, AFTER, they were picked up, for what they are going through, and you can't tell me what the belly of the beast looks like unless you get out of your safe zone and get consumed by it and look.

Someone did a hearing for bond, set an amount they cannot afford, decided they would be a flight risk since they are under contract and are keeping them to compel performance.

NO law nor sheriff can interfere with the obligations of contracts.

Had there been no signature, had the Bundys and Hammonds not had a meeting of the minds with these people, there would be no controversy.

Anonymous said...

Part 3 of 4
This is opinion, I am not a lawyer, IANAL
Pleading and being re-presented to their courts in admiralty, is partially their doing.

Some will bilk, that's none-sense and I would reply, in kindness, if you haven't been in the belly of the beast, how can you tell me what it looks like? What? Your internet research? It's distorted. Whoever you are trusting on the internet may not have been in the belly either, and only telling you what they heard or saw in a picture.
Opinion, as I am not a lawyer, IANAL

Bundy/Hammonds were picked up against their free will, I wonder if they asked to see the warrant to find out who signed and and who claimed to 'own' their bodies to be delivered to some building for some cause.

They were taken to a facility against their free will. Where in any prior contracts they have, driver's license, registration of the car they were traveling in, were they giving permission to be stopped under duress and threat to their life.

They were offered to sign for bond, by someone who spoke to them, told them what they were charged with and asked them to sign that contract authenticating the charge against the, giving the signature is contract, I'm sure they know that.

If the man or woman act-ing as magistrate make the offer of the charge, and Bundy/Hammonds accepts the offer before the man or woman act-ing as magistrate withdraws the offer, a contract is formed between them.

If their contract is enforceable at law, and I would say, yes it is, because there is probably video to prove there was no gun to their head; then either can sue the other for breach and recover damages.

At the moment the offer is accepted, a contract is formed.
Both are bound by their mutual promises.

The magistrate passes their acceptance to another to try them for the charge they accepted.

If they agreed to be in bond-age (where they agree to have a price tag placed on their freedom), and enter the contract for bond-age for an amount they could not possibly afford to pay right then an there, then they'd have to enter another contract with a bail bondsman to pay for what they agreed to pay without having the money to pay as agreed.

Do you see?
They say you are doing this to you!

You on the other hand, shoot yourself in the foot, and then ask for a galactic to attack the people who were around you when you did it.

It's not gonna happen.

Anonymous said...

If the idiot Sheriff even takes the time to sit down and read this letter, I doubt that he has the mental capacity to comprehend anything Judge Anna is saying. My guess is that he suffers the disease of cognitive dissonance and believes anything the, so called, powers that be tell him is legal. He has no concept of what is lawful. Even with this beautifully written explanation, from Judge Anna, this guy just aint gonna get it. If this guy's brains were made out of gasoline he wouldn't have enough to drive a piss-ant's motor cycle around the inside of a Cheerio. Same for Governor Brown of the STATE OF OREGON, INC.

Anonymous said...

Part 4 of 4
This is opinion, I am not a lawyer, IANAL
It's a spiritual fact that the human race or condition ages each year but the spirit can remain at the level of a 10 yr old.

Galactics are spiritually mature, and a bunch of teenages are not going to go into a daycare and beat up kids over the claims of other kids who are participating in their own harm.

In civil law, the term is called, contributary negligence.
Bundy/Hammonds contributed to the event that give rise to their claim. (they sign the documents given to them by the people [I am certain they were not familiar to the Bundy/Hammonds] - they recognize the authority of red and blue flashing lights and costumed day workers [I am certain they were not familiar to the Bundy/Hammonds] now due to all this playing in the represented land, they gave up their own property, it's intangible, it's their freedom. It's a right they had and they negotiated it away for an amount they could not afford.

Judge Anna is pissing in the wind, and it's not getting on anyone.

All of these people who 'belong' are the ones who are agreeing to these things, and they get mad and people for refusing to belong and call them 'illegal' for having the mind to not be anyone's property and not have anyone tell them where they can and cannot go.

They get made at 'illegals' for not entering contracts that will put them into more contracts where people who are not familiar to them can control their lives.

Yes, no matter how old the physical body is, the spiritual body is still maturing and the majority, regardless of physical age, are collectively at the same spiritual level, and when they all agree to do harm, or go to war, or hate, or discriminate, it's everything their government can do, is to protect those that have grown spiritually and show they are spiritually mature because they don't have to kill, cause harm to another, seek the demise of another, to resolve a conflict.

It's the Bundy/Hammonds own fault, AFTER, they were picked up, for what they are going through, and you can't tell me what the belly of the beast looks like unless you get out of your safe zone and get consumed by it and look.

Someone did a hearing for bond, set an amount they cannot afford, decided they would be a flight risk since they are under contract and are keeping them to compel performance.

NO law nor sheriff can interfere with the obligations of contracts.

Had there been no signature, had the Bundys and Hammonds not had a meeting of the minds with these people, there would be no controversy.

Pleading and being re-presented to their courts in admiralty, is partially their doing.

Some will bilk, that's none-sense and I would reply, in kindness, if you haven't been in the belly of the beast, how can you tell me what it looks like? What? Your internet research? It's distorted. Whoever you are trusting on the internet may not have been in the belly either, and only telling you what they heard or saw in a picture.

Anonymous said...

FYI - Sheriff Ward was not "elected" by the people of Harney County. He was appointed by a selected county subcommittee that included Judge Steven Grasty. The documentation can be found on the Harney County website under the archived meeting minutes.

Lovely Critters said...

We had a Remembering LaVoy Finicum Gathering at LaVoys murder site on Saturday, and wouldn't you know, someone tore it all down, but the big Cross. Some people have no class. There were Native Artifacts left there, and tearing up a Memorial is illegal in this state, but of course Sheriff Ward has done nothing.

Anonymous said...

After reading this, I am sure all of the sheriffs are shaking in their shoes. Can't you just feel the fear? When will she wake up from her delusion?

Anonymous said...

Would someone please point out to this nut that the Lufkin case accomplished nothing, and the argument lost every time it was brought up.

Anonymous said...

What fairy tale universe does this woman live in that she thinks she can give orders to legitimate law officers?

Lovely Critters said...

You are missing her point. We have been duped into Admiralty Courts (think of Maritime, which is law of the sea), and we are guaranteed via our Constitution to have American Common Law Courts. This is one of the many deceitful things the bankers/elite have pulled, over many years. The changes, so subtle, most did not know, or see it. Ever wonder why you see Gold Fringe or border around our flag? Yet do not remember or see that detail on home flags? That shows Admiralty Law.

Lovely Critters said...

Warrant for their arrest was not signed until January 27th! There is a photo, and I saw it.

Anonymous said...

I can see that Lovely Critters lives in the same fairy tale as "Judge" Anna.

marie said...

YOU ARE RIGHT ABOUT THE CONTRACT BUT WRONG ABOUT THE BINDING OF THE CONTRACT. FULL DISCLOSURE WAS NOT GIVEN TO THE BUNDY'S OR THE HAMMOND'S THAT THE BLM IS ACTING UNDER [FRAUD] POSING AS A DEJURE GOVERNMENT WHEN THEY ARE A FOREIGN CORPORATION. THEREFORE, ANY AND ALL CONTRACTS ARE NULL AND VOID AND IF ANYONE IS TRYING TO HELP THESE PEOPLE A HUGE LAWSUIT NEEDS TO BE PRESENTED UNDER FRAUD AND BREECH OF CONTRACT DUE TO NON-FULL DISCLOSURE. ANON 11:44: WHEN YOU GET THAT ONE LITTLE ISSUE-THAT STICKY LITTLE ISSUE OF FRAUD THEN YOU WILL UNDERSTAND THAT YOU ARE THE ONE WHO DOES NOT KNOW WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT. K?

Lovely Critters said...

And I can see, you have not read the laws regarding this, and I have read some.

Why do you think BHO or Hillary have not been arrested or investigated by Congress? Do you think either one should be? Perhaps because BHO is the CEO of a FOR Profit Corporation? Hillary? An Executive Officer? Tell you what, for the next month...anytime you hear of a gov decision whether city, county, state or federal That makes you go...that doesn't seem right, ask yourself. ..does it make sense if you are a for profit corporation? You will be surprised at your discoveries...but I know, you have read some of the laws and instead of disagreeing and conducting a logical argument, it's easier to dismiss, than to look it up! I tried. Start by reading The Act of 1871, where we incorporated, and since that will prove out, does that not make BHO a CEO?