Dear Patriots (1,400 bcc herein w/permission to forward) herein & below (and thanks for forwarding), simply ‘Nails’ the BS associated with the ‘reasons’ Those People want Gun Control.
Just the other evening I watched a movie called ‘SAFE’. It was FILMED in New York City. There is MORE killing, violence and shooting than you could imagine. I said to myself - “Geez, and in a City whose Mayor (Bloomberg) wants to Ban Guns EVERYWHERE, who advocates the signing of UN 21, has Banned soda’s from being sold in excess of 16 ounces, wants mothers of newborns in City Hospitals to only Breast Feed & NOT use formulas, does not want people who smoke to be allowed to smoke in their own homes and who ‘persuaded’ the City Council to allow him to run for a Third Term, when the City Charter only allowed for a Maximum of 2-Terms,…..but TAKE THE MONEY FROM HOLLYWOOD AND ALLOW HIS NYC FILM COMMISSION TO APPROVE THE MOVIE BEING FILMED THAT CONTAINS IN IT MORE KILLING AND GUN TOATING - THAT’S OK.
I guess the Killing & Violence in the Movie is OK and does not raise itself to the ‘Same Level’ as that ‘Mentality’ associated with the ‘Rationale’ for Gun Laws????????????????
THIS TYPE OF WANTON HYPOCRISY IS EVERYWHERE!
THESE ARE ‘THOSE PEOPLE’, THAT GENERAL LEE SPOKE ABOUT, WHO WALK A PATH OF - ‘DO AS I SAY, BUT NOT AS I DO ’.
And this is the SAME MENTALITY THAT IS RUNNING AND DESTROYING OUR COUNTRY!!!!!!!!
‘Those People’ REFUSE TO ADDRESS THE REAL PROBLEMS BY CREATING SMOKE-SCREENS ELSEWHERE THAT ARE DESTROYING OUR INDIVIDUAL LIBERTIES & FREEDOMS!
New York City, where several years ago, one Colin Ferguson boards a Long Island Train, and KILLS 6 innocent people before being stopped while reloading.
One of the victim’s wives becomes a Congresswoman thereafter and goes on a Crusade to STOP & PREVENT GUNS ALTOGETHER FROM BEING SOLD.
I sit in AMAZEMENT AND ASK MYSELF THIS:
WHAT IF NYC DID NOT MAKE IT SO DIFFICULT FOR THEIR CITIZENS TO OWN & CARRY GUNS- PARTICULARLY PISTOLS?
AND WHAT IF, AN ARMED CITIZEN, WAS ABOARD THAT TRIAN?
PERHAPS 6 would have NOT DIED AND WOULD BE WITH THEIR FAMILIES TODAY, AND PERHAPS THAT CITIZEN WOULD HAVE PUT 3 IN THE CHEST OF THAT FOOL WHO WAS NOT CRAZY?
Does ANYONE seriously believe that ANY Gun Law, that ONLY DIMINISHES the Rights of Citizens and does NOTHING to stop or prevent crime, has or will WORK?
C’mon; that is a LIBERAL FAIRY TALE OF PROFANE BULLCRAP AND IF YOU BELIEVE THAT, THEN SEND ME AN E-MAIL WITH YOUR CHRISTMNAS WISH LIST AND LOOK FOR ME AND MY REINDEER TO LAND ON YOUR ROOF IN DECEMBER.
All Roads Lead to 1865- WE MUST SEPARATE!
Craig Maus,
President, The Confederate Society of America
_____________________________________________________________
From: C S
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 11:40 PM
Subject: I hope you understand this is ALL sarcasm...
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 11:40 PM
Subject: I hope you understand this is ALL sarcasm...
Emphasizes the stupidity perfectly...
C S
=====================
C S
=====================
40 "Pretty Good" Reasons to Ban Private Gun Ownership
1. Banning guns works, which is why New York, DC, Detroit & Chicago cops need guns.
1. Banning guns works, which is why New York, DC, Detroit & Chicago cops need guns.
2. Washington DC’s low murder rate, of 69 per 100,000, is due to strict gun control and Indianapolis’s high murder rate, of 9 per 100,000, is due to the lack of gun control.
3. Statistics showing high murder rates, justify gun control, but statistics showing increasing murder rates, after gun control, are “just statistics.”
4. The Brady Bill and the Assault Weapons Ban, both of which went into effect in 1994, are responsible for the decrease in violent crime rates, which have been declining since 1991.
5. We must get rid of guns because; a deranged lunatic may go on a shooting spree at any time and anyone who would own a gun out of fear of such a lunatic is paranoid, delusional and dangerous to himself and others.
6. The more helpless you are, the safer you are from criminals.
7. An intruder will be incapacitated by tear gas or oven spray, but if shot with a .357 Magnum will get angry and kill you.
8. A woman raped and strangled is morally superior to a woman with a smoking gun and a dead rapist at her feet.
9. When confronted by violent criminals, you should “put up no defense – give them what they want, or run” (Handgun Control Inc. Chairman Pete Shields, Guns Don’t Die – People Do, 1981, p. 125).
10. The New England Journal of Medicine is filled with expert advice about guns; just like Guns & Ammo has some excellent treatises on heart surgery.
11. One should consult an automotive engineer for safer seat belts, a civil engineer for a better bridge, a surgeon for internal medicine, a computer programmer for hard drive problems and Sarah Brady for firearms expertise.
12. The 2nd Amendment, ratified in 1787, refers to the National Guard, which was created 130 years later, in 1917.
13. The National Guard, federally funded, with bases on federal land, using federally-owned weapons, vehicles, buildings and uniforms, punishing trespassers under federal law, is a “state” militia.
14. These phrases: “right of the people peaceably to assemble”, “right of the people to be secure in their homes”, “enumerations herein of certain rights shall not be construed to disparage others retained by the people” and “The powers not delegated herein are reserved to the states respectively, and to the people” all refer to individuals, but “the right of the people to keep and bear arms” refers to the state.
15. “The Constitution is strong and will never change”. But, we should ban and seize all guns thereby violating the 2nd, 4th, and 5th Amendments to that Constitution.
16. Rifles and handguns aren’t necessary to national defense! Of course, the army has hundreds of thousands of them.
17. Private citizens shouldn’t have handguns, because they aren’t “military weapons”, but private citizens shouldn’t have “assault rifles”, because they are military weapons.
18. In spite of waiting periods, background checks, fingerprinting, government forms, etc., guns today are too readily available, which is responsible for recent school shootings. In the 1940’s, 1950’s and 1960’s, anyone could buy guns at hardware stores, army surplus stores, gas stations, variety stores, Sears mail order, no waiting, no background check, no fingerprints, no government forms and there were no school shootings.
19. The NRA’s attempt to run a “don’t touch” campaign, about kids handling guns is propaganda, but the anti-gun lobby’s attempt to run a “don’t touch” campaign, is responsible social activity.
20. Guns are so complex that, special training is necessary to use them properly and so simple to use that, they make murder easy.
21. A handgun, with up to 4 controls, is far too complex for the typical adult to learn to use, as opposed to an automobile, that only has 20.
22. Women are just as intelligent and capable as men but, a woman with a gun is “an accident waiting to happen” and gun makers’ advertisements aimed at women are “preying on their fears”.
23. Ordinary people in the presence of guns turn into slaughtering butchers, but revert to normal when the weapon is removed.
24. Guns cause violence, which is why there are so many mass killings at gun shows.
25. A majority of the population supports gun control, just like a majority of the population supported owning slaves.
26. Any self-loading small arm can legitimately be considered to be a “weapon of mass destruction” or an “assault weapon”.
27. Most people can’t be trusted, so we should have laws against guns, which most people will abide by, because they can be trusted.
28. The right of Internet pornographers to exist cannot be questioned, because it is constitutionally protected by the Bill of Rights, but the use of handguns for self defense is not really protected by the Bill of Rights.
29. Free speech entitles one to own newspapers, transmitters, computers and typewriters, but self- defense only justifies bare hands.
30. The ACLU is good, because it uncompromisingly defends certain parts of the Constitution and the NRA is bad, because it defends other, different parts of the Constitution.
31. Charlton Heston, a movie actor as president of the NRA, was a cheap lunatic who should be ignored, but Michael Douglas, a movie actor as a representative of Handgun Control, Inc., is an ambassador for peace who is entitled to an audience at the UN arms control summit.
32. Police operate with backup within groups, which is why they need larger capacity pistol magazines than do “civilians”, who must face criminals alone and therefore need less ammunition.
33. We should ban “Saturday Night Specials” and other inexpensive guns, because it’s not fair that poor people have access to guns too.
34. Police officers have some special Jedi-like mastery over handguns that private citizens can never hope to obtain.
35. Private citizens don’t need a gun for self-protection, because the police are there to protect them, even though the Supreme Court says the police are not responsible for their protection.
36. Citizens don’t need to carry a gun for personal protection, but police chiefs, who are desk-bound administrators who work in a building filled with cops, need a gun.
37. “Assault weapons” have no purpose other than to kill large numbers of people. The police need assault weapons. You do not.
38. When Microsoft pressures its distributors to give Microsoft preferential promotion, that’s bad; but when the Federal government pressures cities to buy guns only from Smith & Wesson, that’s good.
39. Trigger locks do not interfere with the ability to use a gun for defensive purposes, which is why you ALWAYS see police officers with a trigger lock on their duty weapon.
4 comments:
They can take away my gun when they pry it from my dead fingers! !
Does the moron who wrote this actually believe it let alone understand what he wrote or did you get this from SNL?
They want your gun's so they have total control of you. They are afraid you might come after them.
I dont know if the "moron" understood or believed what he wrote.... but I did, and thank him for his brilliant tongue in cheek ... dry, ... okay... arid... humor in dealing with the inane illogical arguments persented on behalf of gun control. Thanks for pointing out the insanity of such convoluted thinking and the danger of falling for a fancy slogan with no substance. Every statistic on private gun ownership by citizens of the US (not some other country with its own history and culture), but the USA... shows the benfits in terms of safety and security far far outweigh any risk or or danger from the occassional lunatic. As a single woman, I would far prefer to face a potential rapist in my home with Smith and Wesson, than a cell phone dialing 911.
Post a Comment