April 18, 2013
DEFINITELY
A MISSILE STRIKE
Permalink
THIS
WEB SITE WAS TEMPORARILY TAKEN OFFLINE DUE TO THE MISSILE ARTICLE AND MY
COMMENTS ABOUT WHAT SHOULD BE DONE ABOUT IT. IT WAS A WARNING SHOT, AND I AM
BACK AND EDITED THE ARTICLE DOWN. I WILL SAY THIS, THE MISSILE STRIKE WAS ON
MEXICAN TELEVISION AND YOU COULD CLEARLY HEAR THE MISSILE OVER THE TV SET AS
WELL, THE TURBINES IN THE JET ENGINE AS IT CAME IN. THIS IS NOT A HOAX, THAT
FERTILIZER PLANT EXPLOSION WAS A TOMAHAWK HIT, PROBABLY THE SECOND OF TWO.
The server was
not offline due to malfunctions, but the account was disabled. It told me there
was no such domain as Jimstonefreelance and to register it all over again.
Simultaneously computers on other connections could not hit the web site. When
I posted this to the forum (which runs independently) the problem cleared, and
I edited the missile strike article down to NOT include the details of what
should be done about the missile strike and how, against WHO.Do not be fooled by them saying how strong the earthquake from the blast was, a 2.1has the same seismic yield as 50 pounds of TNT detonated below ground, and a Tomahawk can carry over a thousand pounds of higher grade explosive. The reduced seismic signature can be attributed to the fact that the detonation was above ground and not perfectly coupled to the ground to maximize the seismic effects of that much explosive going off.
Bottom
line? That earthquake was NOTHING compared to what weapons of war routinely
produce
I have re posted the
following after carefully analyzing the other videos, and though saying less
than what is in the original post is a disservice to the innocent, I HAVE TO,
BECAUSE I WILL BE SHUT DOWN IF I SAY WHAT REALLY NEEDS TO BE SAID. You can hear the missile in ALL the videos, but how loud it is on approach, and the tone it has all depends upon where people were located while shooting the video. Some videos have the Tomahawk's jet engine decreasing in pitch and very loud as it goes past them nearby, and other videos have the engine sound very quiet with the pitch increasing as it approaches them because it is far away and approaching from the other side. But it can be heard in ALL videos if you use good headphones or really good speakers with the volume cranked.
Don't
sit and think about how the flame looks, don't even bother with how it goes
from left of the explosion to right, and how the explosion is elongated. Pay no
mind to ANY OF THAT, WHICH BY ITSELF PROVES A MISSILE JUST WATCH THIS
VIDEO AND LISTEN TO THE SOUNDTRACK. YOU CAN CLEARLY HEAR THE MISSILE COME
IN BEFORE THE BLAST.
If they kill this web site over me
saying it like it is AND what to do about it, it will be re instated at
destroythedarkness.com and I suggest you bookmark the forum so you can go there
as well. I will also post to Beforeitsnews.com because they are decent and do
not shut me out. The folks at Abeldanger.net are also a good alternative
backup, as is Degaray.com and Aangirfan at Blogspot. Though I have been off on
my own for a while, if I get wiped here I will certainly be very likely to pop
up at those locations.
I just cannot see this
missile strike and subsequently shut my mouth, this is TOO MUCH, DAMN THEM.
This article is substantially edited, but it is better to be able to say at
least SOMETHING than it is to be totally shut down. I NEED A SERVER IN RUSSIA, OR
CHINA, OR SOME OTHER COUNTRY THAT WONT SHUT IT DOWN WHEN I REALLY SAY IT
LIKE I SHOULD.Perhaps no place is safe . . . . .
http://www.jimstonefreelance.com/
3 comments:
I was a military trained firefighter, and I can tell you, For Sure, based on that same video that there was NO, repeat NO "missile Strike". The video CLEARLY shows what is known as a Vapor Reflash, where the smoke, which IS still quite flammable, just has lost the heat or consumed the available oxygen, remixes with fresh air and gets reheated (the flame plume reaches out deeper into the smoke plume just before the reflash happens) Also, due to this being an anhydrous ammonia explosion, the heat was not only burning the fuel, but that chemical, when it burns, releases it's own oxygen which increases the heat of the fire and can cause the smoke plume to reflash on it's own due to the increased oxy content. The smoke flashed, and reignited, burning back towards the initial fire. The explosion came right after that, but it would NOT take a missile to do that kind of damage, the fertilizers themselves are extremely dangerous explosives in their own right and should have NEVER been sited that close to housing, schools, nursing homes. hospitals or ANYTHING publicly inhabited like that. But a missile, I am sorry, but no, did not happen. I am a big believer of conspiracies and all of that, and had I seen even a hint that it was possibly a missile, I would state so, but here, there Was no missile, just stuff that any well trained Aerospace grade, aircraft grade or weapons grade firefighter can tell you, that was a vapor reflash and subsequent explosion from a high nitrate fertilizer...Same stuff used in the KC bombing, only there was one heck of a lot more of it than a couple of barrels full in a van!
The sound heard, that screaming sound just before and during the first part of the explosion, is the steel tank that contained the anhydrous ammonia as it expands, like a balloon, to the bursting point, tears the steel like paper, and then comes apart in the explosion. Like I said before, I am a BIG believer in conspiracies but, having seen multiple videos and with my firefighting experience, being able to see the vapor reflash and anyone having heard the sound of steel coming apart like that in an explosion will never forget that particular screaming sound, it is very memorable and distinctive, nothing sounds quite like it. The amount of anhydrous ammonia there was also considerably more than an equivalent to 50 lbs of TNT, so the seismic reading is easily believable without a missile...that stuff is plain NASTY and DANGEROUS. Rather than the military launching a missile, I would think it much more likely that Monsanto, whom the company tried to sue for overcharging on their Roundup herbicide, sabotaged the factory with a time delay incendiary device, just enough to get a fire going. The nature of the fertilizers stored, mixed and sold there would certainly do the rest without having to resort to a missile, which would be obvious by the debris. Much easier, quieter and cheaper and just as sure to just start a fire at night when it would have the chance to get fully established and then the fertilizer would do the rest.
It was a missle, plain and simple. No chemical fire explosion whether it involves anhydrous ammonia or other chemical with explosive potential make the sound of a missle before it blows. Period. The military has neither "denied nor confirmed," when questioned as to a military helicopter was downed in the vicinity of the explosion. The helicopter firing the missle was do close and due to the anhydrous ammonia present, the pilot didn't expect the powerful backlash of the explosion. Deeper into the rabbit hole we go...
Post a Comment