Friday, April 20, 2018

Anna von Reitz: NLA – John Darash Exposed!

On Apr 29, 2016, at 2:24 AM, Anna von Reitz <avannavon@gmail.com> wrote:
Calling Out John Daresh and NLA — Round Two


Today, I will address Daresh’s “Information”— which should rightly be titled, “Disinformation” issued a couple days ago.   I quote:

Daresh:   “This brings us to the main purpose of this Information: Government agent provocateurs have been fueling a quasi-shadow government movement that essentially advocates the overthrow of the government.”

Anna:  What government?  A corporation run by international banking cartels is not our government, is it?  In fact, a corporation doesn’t actually have the capacity to act as a sovereign government at all and we are merely stretching euphemism beyond its limit to pretend that it does.

Daresh:  People in this movement, led by de facto Judge Anna Von Reitz, de facto Judge Bruce Doucette and de facto god-graced Administrator Joaquin Folch, who have taken on these self-appointed titles, are duping people from the liberty movements looking for a solution to the subversion within our government who, being ignorant of the law, fall prey to the Pied Pipers .

Anna:  There are no “self-appointed titles” involved including “Pied Piper” and nothing “de facto” about it. Everything we’ve done is firmly based on existing Law.   We are filling vacated public offices that are owed to our own de jure government.  When we offered to show Daresh the facts, he wouldn’t look.  His response was rump in the air, head in the sand.  So there he sits, ignorant as ever, making irresponsible accusations.  NLA deserves far, far better leadership, thank you.

Read the Foreign Sovereigns Immunities Act (FSIA) and the International Organizations Immunities Act (IOIA) for yourselves and then read my explanation of how all this happened in the “Common Law vs. Admiralty Law” article posted at http://www.annavonreitz.com.&nbsp;

Daresh:  Many who are following these de facto judges, actually believe them to be properly elected or appointed.

Anna:  We are properly elected Common Law Judges but Daresh mistakenly thinks that we are “supposed to be” Admiralty Judges instead.  He expected me to be a Bar Attorney—-that’s how far behind the curve he really is.  “Oh, look, Dick, there’s a squirrel…..no, Jane, it’s a cat with a fluffy tail….”

Daresh:  Even we thought for a while that Anna Von Reitz was an Alaskan Supreme Court Judge. We spent many months attempting to verify whether she was even a real person.

 Anna:  Hahahahahahah!  I have been here in the same spot since 1992 as thousands of people who have contacted me directly and honestly can confirm.  The key words here are “honestly and directly”.

I sent Daresh an original wet-ink copy of our American Affidavit of Probable Cause complete with all my contact information last July and I have the mailing receipts to prove it.   Did he call me?  No.  Did he email me?  No.  Did he write me a letter?  No.  Ask me any questions? No.

Let’s just say all those “months” they tried so hard to “verify” my existence could have been settled with a phone call and weren’t.  Daresh wasn’t looking for me.  He was trying to avoid me and to avoid taking action on our affidavit.
Daresh:  But, when she finally surfaced……

Anna:  Yeah, right, as if I was hiding.  That’s why I issue all my documents, books, articles, everything, with current contact information?  

 Daresh:  …..We saw that she was connected to this quasi-shadow government movement that we have been hearing about; but we had yet to identify the people who are part of this movement until now. We believe the leaders of this movement are fueled by government agent provocateurs.

Anna:  Daresh is so clueless that he appears not to know what the “shadow government” is or what the phrase means—- let me enlighten him (and everyone else who needs to know). The Shadow Government was put in place by FDR many long years ago.  It refers to all the appointed offices and agencies that have been promulgating their own rules —like the FBI and FEMA and IRS and DHS— and then left to run rampant over the people who pay their wages.

This “government by political appointment” is the “Shadow Government” — as defined by those who first coined the term back in the 1930’s and 40’s. —-and not coincidentally, it was the “Shadow Government” that murdered LaVoy Finicum.

All those so senselessly and groundlessly accused—myself, Judge Doucette, and the others— not only support the Common Law Grand Jury Movement, we are committed to restoring the entire American Common Law Court System.

Anyone who supports the resurrection of the Common Law Grand Juries ought to, as a matter of logic and principle, also support the restoration of the American Common Law Court System that gave the CLGJ’s birth and meaning and enforcement in this country for over 350 years.
But not John Daresh.

He wants to pretend that the restoration of our own Common Law Court System including the Common Law Grand Jury portion of it —-is a plot, an attempt to “overthrow the government”.  What a Logic Failure.  Grade “F”.

There are a number of reasons why our effort to restore our entire court system cannot be construed as any act of “insurrection” or attempt to “overthrow” any government.

First, there’s the plain fact that we haven’t advocated any such thing.
Second, there’s the fact that no foreign corporation is competent to act as a sovereign government with respect to us and these United States, so the concept of “insurrection” doesn’t apply.

Third, there’s the fact that just as we are heir to the Common Law Grand Jury we are heir to the entire American Common Law Court System as well.  If we are owed one part of it, we are owed the whole of it.

The many good people associated with NLA who are trying to restore the Common Law Grand Juries don’t deserve “leadership” that tells lies and causes trouble, nor do they need a truncated vision that leaves their Grand Juries spinning their wheels, going nowhere.

The simple fact is that the Grand Juries are meant to be part of the whole American Common Law Court System and without the whole Court functioning in support of their actions, the Grand Juries are about as useless as a windmill on a still day.  They can hand down presentments and informations and writs until they are blue in the face and have nothing to show for their effort but a thank you from John Daresh.

This is what we are trying to tell NLA, and if you stop and think about it, you will realize that what we are telling you is true.

 https://scannedretina.com/2016/04/29/anna-von-reitz-nla-john-darash-exposed/

3 comments:

  1. No wonder NLA can't get things done.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Ummm yea... but a few comments... But first about the flag.. hmmm well the "United States" did not exist until later. It is a corporation (for purposes of taxation (yes it is a taxpayer as defined) it is considered a foreign corporation) and was created for much the same reason that other corporations are created, to limit liability and to take on huge projects that the average individual could not even attempt. (although today with crowd funding etc it is possible) but again it is created to take on liability and the "thirteen united States of America" had a serious debt to France and other countries and states, persons and individuals who could put a lien on them and their stuff if not paid or negotiated in some way. So, very cleverly they created a corporation to take on the debt and other responsibilities. Great idea and it worked.. except for the evil which from the beginning was present and ever influencing, in-field-trading the De Jure Form of Government to corrupt it and turn it against the people to enslave them yet again.
    In other words there is really nothing wrong with the "system" it is those in office which know not the "principles" founded upon nor the purpose for which the people created the office for "That to secure these Rights Governments are instituted" and "to effect (cause, bring about, make happen) their Safety and Happiness."
    Government in any Form, corporations etc all are without a conscience and need "governing" and those that volunteer to serve in an office of public trusts (the Unanimous Declaration is the peoples Trust, Express irrevocable trust and "any Form of Government" which "becomes destructive of these ends" the people must "alter or abolish it"

    ReplyDelete
  3. The "Flag" that was written about in our National anthem was the "American Flag" as there was no "United States" at that time only the "thirteen united States of America" States of America united together unanimously in these precepts and assertions, trusting in their Creator to prevail against the most powerful Navy and military force in the world at that time... and won!
    Perhaps there was a "peace flag" flown at post offices but I have not found any cause for action nor ever read a case where the flag made one iota of difference nor out of the thousands of cases read, do I find one reference to the "peace Flag" and its authority or any flag having authority over another or as the cause for any rights to be abrogated, reduced, altered, etc. But the Supreme court did state "the mere chilling of a right is a taking" (theft) and found in favor of the individual and their rights.
    My research finally ended when I found that the fringe was for "special events" and is only on three sides so it controls nothing, changes nothing and is not found to be pertinent in any case I have knowledge of. In short it is a distraction. Though I did a test one time, try it and see for yourself... take an "American Flag" (it was done with the Horizontal red and white and a tiny pedestal though I believe one could just wear it on one's body, clothing etc so that it "flies" so that one is "flying" their flag and as such any who do business with you (ship master) does so under the laws of that flag (ship owner) and if not wishing to abide by the laws of that flag shall do no business at all. (rough quote of the international law of the flag) Well, once the flag was put on the table the judge got up and left the room... not wishing to conduct contract under the laws of that flag.... hmmm So perhaps as seems to be more and more the case as I research things more deeply, is that it is not about the flag that the court is flying as much as it is the flag each of us flies, or not...... sounds a bit like affirmative defenses... failure to assert ones affirmative defenses within 30 thirty days constitutes waver of them. (rough quote from various sources including traffic tickets on the back i the fine print)which is why they never schedule a hearing till after 30 days. Ignorant people fail to assert their rights and then show up and answer to the fictitious "assumed name" indicating they are the subjects/agent or surety for the Defendant (fictitious non-existing entity) and wonder why they get their asses handed to them with a bite taken out.
    Just as the Statutes and Codes etc do not have authority to impose upon the people the people must know and educate and institute legislation that requires all public servants, agents, officers and holders of offices of public trust or profit (corporations) to know the proper applications and to recognize that man is not a creation of the state nor subject thereto. But revenues, revenues, theft by color of law is just so lucrative... criminals do what criminals do and Bullies compel others to actively support their criminal activities. But over time people are reprogrammed to believe they are subjects so it is really easy to take advantage of them. But in the end it is all unlawful and is "giving aid or comfort to the enemy" = treason.

    ReplyDelete