Reader
Comments On "The Business Deal Of The World"
9/24/2014
Reader Comments On: "The Business Deal Of The
World" By JC Collins
irrelevant111: September 23, 2014 at 4:34 pm Once again spot on, yet it has been common knowledge for awhile. ISIS is a distraction to give credence to US interaction. Ukraine is a lost cause, Putin played it brilliantly. The Saudis alliance w the west will migrate to the dragon n bear.
The US is running out of ammo. Russo/China are now positioned in the ME comfortably. An interstesting middle game from the chessboard perspective. The sadness is the lives that suffer while the game continues. Food for thought…
~~~
irrelevant111: September 23, 2014 at 4:34 pm Once again spot on, yet it has been common knowledge for awhile. ISIS is a distraction to give credence to US interaction. Ukraine is a lost cause, Putin played it brilliantly. The Saudis alliance w the west will migrate to the dragon n bear.
The US is running out of ammo. Russo/China are now positioned in the ME comfortably. An interstesting middle game from the chessboard perspective. The sadness is the lives that suffer while the game continues. Food for thought…
~~~
Oliver: September 23, 2014 at
7:17 pm The Rothschilds have some scores to settle way back thus
leaning towards the softer BRICS NWO..
leaving the Rockefellers crude NWO behind?Interesting indeed..
leaving the Rockefellers crude NWO behind?Interesting indeed..
Dripfood: September 23,
2014 at 9:04 pm JC, I don’t understand why you suddenly start
supporting the nation versus nation storylines again. Isn’t the corporatocracy
globally united? Aren’t the US military just a war-tool for the global elite?
Since the US military is still the only organization that can project its full destructive power anywhere in the world within short notice, it still is the preferred supplier (and dissolver) of chaos and fear for the global planners.
Do you believe the local (national) US stakeholders have a meaningful vote in the deployment of ‘it’s’ military forces?
Although the wars in the ME are waged over control of resources, it’s highly improbable that they’re truly waged between nations. Isn’t it more likely that the global elite is waging this war to the break the tribal power structures within the ME? As for me, I continue to see the ME being prepared for unification (under firm global control).
JC Collins September 23, 2014 at 9:22 pm There is a level of independence afforded all world powers but only under the parameters allowed by the international bankers.
Industrial interests in all countries, some of which are also international bankers or affiliated with international bankers, are vying for resource control. This is why there appears to be a division within the US military. All goals and objectives are tied closely together.
The end objective is determined but how we get there is allowed some flex. Does this help explain it?
Dripfood: September 23, 2014 at 9:44 pm Do you mean there are still some pockets of industrial power that are not firmly under centralized control? Or are the centrally controlled industrial interests fighting among each other over unallocated resources?
Dripfood: September 23, 2014 at 9:59 pm Nevermind my last comment. I think I get it.
They must be allowing some internal competition, as long as the ensuing chaos serves the long term objective of full consolidation. Thanks!
Dripfood: September 23, 2014 at 9:22 pm It’s also my conjecture that the whole Arab Spring movement was in truth a WW2-style gold grab from regional/tribal rulers. This gold grab was (IMO) the first move in preparing the regional powerscape for future unification.
Cramley: September 23, 2014 at 11:14 pm I recommend going over to the SGE website now. It’s been cleaned up from last week, much more polished and organized.
Read over the product details.
http://www.en.sge.com.cn/products/price-matching-products/t0-products/product-list/
Most importantly read the speech not by Zhou Xiaochuan, but Xu Luode, Chairman of SGE.
http://www.en.sge.com.cn/news-announcement/news/520471.shtml
You know what he’s describing? It sounds a lot like Jim Willie’s gold settlement system.
JC Collins September 23, 2014 at 11:41 pm They’ve done a nice job on the website. What is being explained in the link of Xiaochuan’s speach is the fundamental structure of a gold exchange. What is important is the reference to the following quotes:
“The introduction of the “Shanghai gold” in the gold market will help to improve the price discovery function of the RMB, strengthen the effective linkage between Chinese and international markets…”
And:
“It will also help to enhance the international influence of RMB and boost its internationalization.”
As I’ve mentioned in a few posts lately, the renminbi is being internationalized and it’s “price discovery function” is being defined so it can be added to the SDR basket valuation. Zhou Xiaochuan himself has stated that China is not interested in a gold standard.
Gold will be important as the system transitions, and there may even be a sort of gold settlement, but not on the scale that an international gold standard would require, and it would be temporary.
A gold exchange with contracts denominated in renminbi is a requirement for SDR addition.
Jura Treschl: September 24, 2014 at 10:11 pm how does the following plays in, http://blogs.wsj.com/economics/2014/09/24/who-is-chinese-central-banker-zhou-xiaochuan/
JC Collins: September 24, 2014 at 10:30 pm It plays in perfectly and don’t forget that Zhoa Xiaochuan is on the executive board of the Bank for International Settlements.
makanda62958: September 24, 2014 at 1:54 pm Thank you as always for the insightful reporting JC. I cannot help but add that every nation on earth now has a FED or ‘central bank’ or is in a group of nations that uses such a bank.
Probably should mention too that the IMF website has a listing of all SDRs held by all the countries of the world (buried though it is) and offers hours of fun for the curious.
Cramley: September 24, 2014 at 4:46 pm With Zhou on the way out this just shows you this deleveraging will not be orderly. Controlled deflation is just not politically acceptable.
I keep thinking about Ben’s 2002 speech especially the section under Fiscal Policy. It may end up being China that implements it. If you don’t have a healthy allocation to gold at this point you simply have to have your head examined.
JC Collins: September 24, 2014 at 10:34 pm Agreed. Holding gold as a base for our own individual financial stability is very important.
Tommydelicious: September 24, 2014 at 9:21 pm As deeply rooted as the control structure is in world politics and specifically the use of the dominant military (currently still the u.s.), there exists the wild card and/or black swan event. I believe we may see something of the sorts in the coming years.
The rift between Sunni and Shiite runs deep, and a grand arsonist knows that he/she only has to provide the spark if there’s enough ignitible material present.
The genius in the schemers scheming is that they are flexible enough, organized well, and intelligent enough to use any such black swans to their advantage.
I wouldn’t own a house without insurance, and as such, would also not have savings without proper insurance (in this case the famous yellow metal). The times they are a changin, and it’ll be a long strange trip indeed.
http://philosophyofmetrics.com/2014/09/23/the-business-deal-of-the-world/
http://www.dinarrecaps.com/our-blog/reader-comments-on-the-business-deal-of-the-world
Since the US military is still the only organization that can project its full destructive power anywhere in the world within short notice, it still is the preferred supplier (and dissolver) of chaos and fear for the global planners.
Do you believe the local (national) US stakeholders have a meaningful vote in the deployment of ‘it’s’ military forces?
Although the wars in the ME are waged over control of resources, it’s highly improbable that they’re truly waged between nations. Isn’t it more likely that the global elite is waging this war to the break the tribal power structures within the ME? As for me, I continue to see the ME being prepared for unification (under firm global control).
JC Collins September 23, 2014 at 9:22 pm There is a level of independence afforded all world powers but only under the parameters allowed by the international bankers.
Industrial interests in all countries, some of which are also international bankers or affiliated with international bankers, are vying for resource control. This is why there appears to be a division within the US military. All goals and objectives are tied closely together.
The end objective is determined but how we get there is allowed some flex. Does this help explain it?
Dripfood: September 23, 2014 at 9:44 pm Do you mean there are still some pockets of industrial power that are not firmly under centralized control? Or are the centrally controlled industrial interests fighting among each other over unallocated resources?
Dripfood: September 23, 2014 at 9:59 pm Nevermind my last comment. I think I get it.
They must be allowing some internal competition, as long as the ensuing chaos serves the long term objective of full consolidation. Thanks!
Dripfood: September 23, 2014 at 9:22 pm It’s also my conjecture that the whole Arab Spring movement was in truth a WW2-style gold grab from regional/tribal rulers. This gold grab was (IMO) the first move in preparing the regional powerscape for future unification.
Cramley: September 23, 2014 at 11:14 pm I recommend going over to the SGE website now. It’s been cleaned up from last week, much more polished and organized.
Read over the product details.
http://www.en.sge.com.cn/products/price-matching-products/t0-products/product-list/
Most importantly read the speech not by Zhou Xiaochuan, but Xu Luode, Chairman of SGE.
http://www.en.sge.com.cn/news-announcement/news/520471.shtml
You know what he’s describing? It sounds a lot like Jim Willie’s gold settlement system.
JC Collins September 23, 2014 at 11:41 pm They’ve done a nice job on the website. What is being explained in the link of Xiaochuan’s speach is the fundamental structure of a gold exchange. What is important is the reference to the following quotes:
“The introduction of the “Shanghai gold” in the gold market will help to improve the price discovery function of the RMB, strengthen the effective linkage between Chinese and international markets…”
And:
“It will also help to enhance the international influence of RMB and boost its internationalization.”
As I’ve mentioned in a few posts lately, the renminbi is being internationalized and it’s “price discovery function” is being defined so it can be added to the SDR basket valuation. Zhou Xiaochuan himself has stated that China is not interested in a gold standard.
Gold will be important as the system transitions, and there may even be a sort of gold settlement, but not on the scale that an international gold standard would require, and it would be temporary.
A gold exchange with contracts denominated in renminbi is a requirement for SDR addition.
Jura Treschl: September 24, 2014 at 10:11 pm how does the following plays in, http://blogs.wsj.com/economics/2014/09/24/who-is-chinese-central-banker-zhou-xiaochuan/
JC Collins: September 24, 2014 at 10:30 pm It plays in perfectly and don’t forget that Zhoa Xiaochuan is on the executive board of the Bank for International Settlements.
makanda62958: September 24, 2014 at 1:54 pm Thank you as always for the insightful reporting JC. I cannot help but add that every nation on earth now has a FED or ‘central bank’ or is in a group of nations that uses such a bank.
Probably should mention too that the IMF website has a listing of all SDRs held by all the countries of the world (buried though it is) and offers hours of fun for the curious.
Cramley: September 24, 2014 at 4:46 pm With Zhou on the way out this just shows you this deleveraging will not be orderly. Controlled deflation is just not politically acceptable.
I keep thinking about Ben’s 2002 speech especially the section under Fiscal Policy. It may end up being China that implements it. If you don’t have a healthy allocation to gold at this point you simply have to have your head examined.
JC Collins: September 24, 2014 at 10:34 pm Agreed. Holding gold as a base for our own individual financial stability is very important.
Tommydelicious: September 24, 2014 at 9:21 pm As deeply rooted as the control structure is in world politics and specifically the use of the dominant military (currently still the u.s.), there exists the wild card and/or black swan event. I believe we may see something of the sorts in the coming years.
The rift between Sunni and Shiite runs deep, and a grand arsonist knows that he/she only has to provide the spark if there’s enough ignitible material present.
The genius in the schemers scheming is that they are flexible enough, organized well, and intelligent enough to use any such black swans to their advantage.
I wouldn’t own a house without insurance, and as such, would also not have savings without proper insurance (in this case the famous yellow metal). The times they are a changin, and it’ll be a long strange trip indeed.
http://philosophyofmetrics.com/2014/09/23/the-business-deal-of-the-world/
http://www.dinarrecaps.com/our-blog/reader-comments-on-the-business-deal-of-the-world
1 comment:
It never fails to amaze me how these " experts " [ JC ] keep crawling out of the woodwork. In recaps a commenter accused JC of being TPTB, he was otherwise civil. JC started name calling like a little boy. We know the Cabal has shills in RV land, and JC's reaction means to me he IS TPTB. One of the most interesting revelations in dinarland, if we ever get it, will be finding out who the shills & the con men were post RV. In retrospect, there should have been a vetting process for these unknown, untested, magically appearing guru's. It appears to me that the qualifications to be a guru are something to send text & one finger. Guru's lacking ' secret sources ' can always spout god crap and anesthetize 3 of 4 readers. TYJM frj
Post a Comment