Why
isn't the Mainstream Media (MSM) in America reporting the fact that
Hillary Clinton admitted in public that the U.S. government created Al
Qaeda, ISIS, Al Nusra, etc.? Why does the MSM refuse to tell the
American people that the United States has not ever actually fought ISIS
but instead has surreptitiously and very actively supported ISIS and
the other radical Muslim terrorists in the Middle East? Why has the
media refused to reveal the fact that ever since Russia started to fight
a true offensive war against ISIS the terrorist organization has been
reduced to almost half?
I'll
tell you why: the MSM is nothing more than a propaganda machine for the
U.S. government--no matter which party is in power. The MSM doesn't
work for the U.S. citizenry. It doesn't even work for its corporate
sponsors. It works for the Washington Power Elite permanently ensconced
in D.C. (and yes, those same Power Elite control most of those media
corporate sponsors).
It
is a sad reality that if one wants to get accurate news reporting, one
must mostly bypass the U.S. propaganda media and look to sources outside
the U.S.
Here is a Canadian publication that covered the Hillary
admission:
“The
following video features Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton
acknowledging that America created and funded Al Qaeda as a terrorist
organization in the heyday of the Soviet-Afghan war:
“‘Let’s remember here… the people we are fighting today we funded them twenty years ago.
“‘Let’s go recruit these mujahideen.
“‘And
great, let them come from Saudi Arabia and other countries, importing
their Wahabi brand of Islam so that we can go beat the Soviet Union.’”
“What
she does not mention is that at no time in the course of the last 35
years has the US ceased to support and finance Al Qaeda as a means to
destabilizing sovereign countries. It was ‘a pretty good idea’, says
Hillary, and it remains a good idea today:
“Amply
documented, the ISIS and Al Nusrah Mujahideen are recruited by NATO and
the Turkish High command, with the support of Saudi Arabia, Qatar and
Israel.
“Should
a presidential candidate who candidly acknowledges that ‘We created Al
Qaeda’ without a word of caution or regret become president of the US,
not to mention Hillary’s commitment to waging nuclear war on Russia if
and when she becomes president of the United States of America.”
The report continues:
“The Global War on Terror (GWOT) is led by the United States. It is not directed against Al Qaeda.
“Quite the opposite: The ‘Global War on Terrorism’ uses Al Qaeda terrorist operatives as their foot soldiers.
“‘Political
Islam’ and the imposition of an ‘Islamic State’ (modeled on Qatar or
Saudi Arabia) is an integral part of US foreign policy.”
The report further states:
“It is a means to destabilizing sovereign countries and imposing ‘regime change’.
“Clinton’s
successor at the State Department, John Kerry is in direct liaison with
Al Nusra, an Al Qaeda affiliated organization in Syria, integrated by
terrorists and funded by the US and its allies.
“In
a bitter irony, John Kerry is not only complicit in the killings
committed by Al Nusra, he is also in blatant violation of US
anti-terrorist legislation. If the latter were to be applied to
politicians in high office, John Kerry would be considered as a ‘Terror
Suspect’”.
See the report here:
Think
it through, folks: the U.S. government creates the radical Islamic
terror networks that justify America's "Global War On Terror" which
directly results in millions of refugees (and no doubt plants terrorists
among them) flooding Europe. At the same time, it purposely refuses to
protect our own borders and even forces states and local communities to
accept hundreds of thousands of Muslim refugees (but the government is
not sending any Christian refugees to America, even though a sizable
percentage of the refugees include Christians also) and pushes NATO to
the doorstep of Russia, which to any objective observer could only be
regarded as an overt incitement to war.
Furthermore,
why doesn't the MSM report the words of Hillary saying that the “best
way to help Israel” is to destroy Syria? Why doesn't the media
acknowledge that official U.S. foreign policy is to foment perpetual
war, not in the name of the safety and security of the United States,
but in the name of "helping" Israel?
Here is how the same Canadian publication covers this part of the story:
“A newly-released
Hillary Clinton email confirmed that the Obama administration has
deliberately provoked the civil war in Syria as the ‘best way to help
Israel.’
“In
an indication of her murderous and psychopathic nature, Clinton also
wrote that it was the ‘right thing’ to personally threaten Bashar
Assad’s family with death.
“In
the email, released by Wikileaks, then Secretary of State Clinton says
that the ‘best way to help Israel’ is to ‘use force’ in Syria to
overthrow the government.”
It continues:
“Even
though all US intelligence reports had long dismissed Iran’s ‘atomic
bomb’ program as a hoax, (a conclusion supported by the International
Atomic Energy Agency), Clinton continues to use these lies to ‘justify’
destroying Syria in the name of Israel.”
And again:
“The
email proves--as if any more proof was needed--that the US government
has been the main sponsor of the growth of terrorism in the Middle East,
and all in order to ‘protect’ Israel.
“It
is also a sobering thought to consider that the ‘refugee’ crisis which
currently threatens to destroy Europe, was directly sparked off by this
US government action as well, insofar as there are any genuine refugees
fleeing the civil war in Syria.
“In
addition, over 250,000 people have been killed in the Syrian conflict,
which has spread to Iraq--all thanks to Clinton and the Obama
administration backing the ‘rebels’ and stoking the fires of war in
Syria.”
See the report here:
If
destroying Syria is the way we “help” Israel, how many other nations
must the U.S. destroy to "help" Israel? And before John Hagee's
braindead disciples start shouting "Destroy them all!” I remind you that
Syria and other parts of the Middle East is the historic home of
millions of Christians going back to the time of the Apostle Paul.
The
truth is, Hillary (and the rest of the grubby gaggle of Neocons)
doesn't give a tinker's dam about Israel. Neocons such as Hillary
Clinton simply use Israel (and the misguided passions of Christians and
conservatives who blindly support Israel) as cover to accomplish their
real agenda: manipulating world governments to the enrichment and
empowerment of themselves.
Donald
Trump is untested. But if Hillary should be elected, I'm confident she
would not make it through her first term without taking us into another
G.W. Bush-type war (or worse)--except she will also add the attempted
disarmament of the American people to her nefarious agenda.
That's
what Neocons do: they foment war. To their very soul, they are
warmongers. And never forget that Hillary Clinton is a true-blue Neocon.
Or if the word “Neoliberal” sounds better to you in describing Hillary,
so be it. They both mean the same thing: WAR.
On
the whole, Neocons and Neolibs are people without conscience. At their
core, they have no allegiance to the United States or any other country.
They are globalists. The only god they serve is the god of power and
wealth, and they don't care how many people--including Americans--they
kill to achieve it. The blood of millions of dead victims around the
world is already dripping from their murderous hands.
And
if you think my indictment against the Neocons is an exaggeration, Paul
Craig Roberts (Assistant Secretary of the Treasury under President
Ronald Reagan) was even more scathing in his condemnation of them:
“The
remaining danger is the crazed American neoconservatives. I know many
of them. They are completely insane ideologues. This inhuman filth has
controlled the foreign policy of every US government since Clinton’s
second term. They are a danger to all life on earth. Look at the
destruction they have wreaked in the former Yugoslavia, in Ukraine, in
Georgia and South Ossetia, in Africa, in Afghanistan and the Middle
East. The American people were too brainwashed by lies and by political
impotence to do anything about it, and Washington’s vassals in Europe,
UK, Canada, Australia, and Japan had to pretend that this policy of
international murder was ‘bringing freedom and democracy.’
“The
crazed filth that controls US foreign policy is capable of defending US
hegemony with nuclear weapons. The neoconservatives must be removed
from power, arrested, and put on international trial for their
horrendous war crimes before they defend their hegemony with Armageddon.
See Roberts’ column here:
And
make no mistake about it: the national news media is a deliberate and
willing facilitator of these international crimes against humanity.
No comments:
Post a Comment