1. DO YOU WRITE SPEEDING TICKETS AGAINST INDIVIDUALS UTILIIZING THEIR OWN AUTOMOBILES FOR THEIR DAILY TRAVEL IN THEIR MUNDANE ACTIVITIES OF LIFE?
2. DO YOU WRITE AN INDIVIDUAL A TRAFFIC TICKET IF THEY DON’T HAVE A LICENSE PLATE ON THEIR AUTOMOBILE WHILE IT IS OBVIOUS THEY ARE NOT ENGAGED IN TRANSPORTATION, BUSINESS, OR COMMERCE WITH SAID AUTOMOBILE?
3. DO YOU WRITE AN INDIVIDUAL A TICKET IF THEY ARE USING THEIR AUTOMOBILE AND DO NOT HAVE INSURANCE, WHILE IT IS OBVIOUS THEY ARE NOT ENGAGED IN TRANSPORTATION, BUSINESS, OR COMMERCE WITH SAID AUTOMOBILE?
4. DO YOU WRITE AN INDIVIDUAL A TICKET IF THEIR AUTOMOBILE IS NOT REGISTERED WITH THE STATE WHILE IT IS OBVIOUS THEY ARE NOT ENGAGED IN TRANSPORTATION, BUSINESS, OR COMMERCE WITH SAID AUTOMOBILE?
5. DO YOU WRITE AN INDIVIDUAL A TRAFFIC TICKET IF THEY RUN A STOP SIGN EVEN IF NO ONE IS INJURED OR HARMED WHILE LIKEWISE IT IS ALSO OBVIOUS THAT THEY ARE NOT ENGAGED IN TRANSPORTATION, BUSINESS, OR COMMERCE WITH SAID AUTOMOBILE?
WHAT DO YOU KNOW - NOT A SINGLE ONE COULD ANSWER
Let me tell you straight to those claiming to be
CONSTITUTIONAL SHERRIFS “YOU CAN’T PICK AND CHOOSE WHAT PARTS OF THE
CONSTITUTION YOU WANT TO UPHOLD OR DEFEND!”
YOU ARE EITHER FOR THE CONSTITUTION OR YOU ARE NOT!!!
I have asked this question to numerous sheriffs, even those claiming to be CONSTITUTIONAL SHERIFFS, and the results have always been the same; NONE believe in or enforce the CONSTITUTION for the united States. Instead they enforce and write individuals up under UCC STATUTES for their prospective states. The problem with this means that every one of them are engaging in FRAUD, DECEPTION, and EXTORTION, as well as Deprivation of RIGHTS under Color of Law! You see these sheriffs and even the police are supposed to know the LAW. However, when you ask them what does UCC stand for they act like they are DEER frozen in headlights of a car! You see, UCC stands for UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE; the keyword being COMMERCIAL!
Thus, every ticket they write to anyone not engaged in commerce/business/
You see the STATE has engaged in Constructive Fraud, and Extortion against the People! They LIE and tell you that you need a Driver’s License to use your automobile, and likewise that you must pay them a tax, as well as register your automobile with the DMV/STATE. However, the truth is that once you do that your automobile is no longer an automobile, but is now classified as a Motor Vehicle because your automobile is now REGISTERED under a Department (DMV) that was brought into existence through the “COMMERCE CLAUSE.” Likewise, you are now contracted as a business and are required to adhere to the statutes devised to regulate those engaged in commerce! As you notice it doesn’t say Department of Automobile! One receives said tickets under statutes meant and devised for those in engaged in COMMERCE with Motor Vehicles (automobiles used specifically for Business/Transportation and Commerce). Did you see that other department? TRANSPORTATION. The State has two departments involved for business as it relates to the MOTOR VEHICLES and that is the DMV, Department of Motor Vehicles, and DOT, Department of Transportation.
Now that we have established some simple facts, what does all of this have to do with Sovereigns? Despite what these ABC agencies tell the people, public, and slave citizens, SOVEREIGNS LOVE THE LAW!!!! They in fact love the LAW so much that they study it. Likewise, this also means that they call the police, sheriffs, prosecutors, attorneys, and even judges on their ILLEGAL PRACTICES that they are carrying out in the name of GREED and CONTROL! Guess what crooks masquerading as government officials are still CROOKS! The sheriffs and the other ABC agencies hate these people with a passion as they make it obvious how these sheriffs, officers, and said government agencies have all said “F” “U” to the Constitution for the united States! Do you see any of these supposed CONSTTUTIONAL SHERIFFS making these illegal tickets come to a halt?
NO!!!!
Do you see any of these CONSTITUTIONAL SHERIFFS arresting these operating the DMVs due to the CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD being done against the PEOPLE?
NO!!!!
Do you see any of these CONSTITUTIONAL SHERIFFS arresting these prosecuting attorneys, police officers, and judges colluding to DEFRAUD and EXTORT money from you, not to mention the Deprivation of your INHERENT RIGHT to TRAVEL?
NO!!!
(THE LAST TIME I
CHECKED I BELIEVED THAT WAS CONSIDERED A RICCO VIOLATION IN FACT)
Really people ask yourself a simple question do you really believe you can get a fair trial when the Judge, the Prosecutors, the Defense Attorneys (Appointed), and the STATUTE ENFORCERS are all paid for by the same CORPORATION?
DOES ANYONE NOT SEE THIS AS A HUGE CONFLICT OF INTEREST?
Sheriffs are no better than politicians! ALL TALK, MOSTLY LIES, AND NO ACTION!!!!
Why again does the
supposed government and their ABC agencies hate SOVEREIGNS and call them a
THREAT to the GOVERNMENT?
How about because the GOVERNMENT is not their GOVERNMENT! In fact it is a Corporation and all these agencies and departments are SUBCORPORATIONS under their mother Corporation and their purpose is to control you, and fleece you in order to increase their wealth!
One must remember that all PEOPLE of America were promised a REPUBLIC form of government not a CORPORATION, not a DEMOCRACY, but a Constitutional REPUBLIC!
Why would anyone not want a DEMOCRACY? Simple, because DEMOCRACY rules by force of MOB mentality which has a tendency to trample or rather strip one of their CONSTTUTIONAL RIGHTS in order to appease another. (In other words it authorizes legalized stealing from one person to give to another individual, or for that matter even other NATIONS)!
Likewise, let us not forget that the United States Corporation went bankrupt in 1933, and we haven’t had a real LAW passed ever since. This is clearly established in H.J.R. 192 accompanied with the War Powers Act and the First 100 ILLEGAL Presidential Executive orders started under Abraham Lincoln! He was a Fraud, just like the history books stating that the Civil War was about slavery! IT REALLY WAS ABOUT SLAVERY, IT WAS NOT ABOUT FREEING THE BLACKS THOUGH FROM BEING SLAVES, BUT RATHER MAKING ALL AMERICANS SLAVES TO THE ESTABLISHED CORPORATION OF WASHINGTON D.C. THAT COPYRIGHTED ITS NAME TO BEING THAT OF THE “UNITED STATES.” IT WAS THIS SAME CORPORATION THAT ESTABLISHED THESE ILLEGAL ABC AGENCIES TO GROW THEIR POWER AND CONTROL OVER THE PEOPLE THROUGH FEAR, INTIMIDATION, AND EXTORTION. YOUR BIRTH CERTIFICATE IS A SLAVE BOND WHERE THE CORPORATION DECLARED YOU YOUR LIVNG BEING DEAD AND SUBSTITUTED IT WITH A TRUST IN YOUR NAME. LIKEWISE, THEY SET UP THE ILLEGAL FED, AND EVEN THE SOCIAL SECURITY OFFICE WHICH IN TRUTH IS SIGNED OFF FOR ITS EXECUTIONOF ACTIONS BY THE QUEEN OF ENGLAND!
You see folks America
NEVER WON its INDEPENDENCE or FREEDOM from England. In fact we were still
fighting with them up until 1812. At that time England finally gave up on
trying to establish its dominance over America by FORCE (OVERT), but then
continued on to overthrow America through COVERT actions by their LAWYERS,
ATTORNEYS, and JUDGES intertwined into what was the currently established
government!
SO AGAIN WHY DO THESE AGENCIES, THE POLICE, AND THE
SHERIFFS HATE THOSE CLAIMING TO BE SOVEREIGNS?
IT’S BECAUSE CROOKS HATE BEING EXPOSED FOR THE CROOKS AND DESPOTE THAT THEY ARE BY THESE SOVEREIGNS!
IN TRUTH ALL AMERICANS ACCORDING TO THOSE THAT LIVE UNDER THE GUIDANCE OF THE CONSTITUTION AND BELIEVE IN NATURAL LAW/GOD’S LAW AND COMMON LAW ARE A THREAT TO THE CORPORATION WHO WANT THE INDIVIDUALS TO BE GOOD LITTLE SLAVES TO THEIR CORPORATION, NEVER QUESTION ANYTHING, FEAR THEIR SUPPOSED GOVERNMENT, AND FOLLOW THEIR STATUES BLINDLY, EVEN WHEN THOSE STATUTES ARE CONTRADICTIVE TO ONE’S INHERENT RIGHTS AS PUT FORTH BY THE CONSTTUTION FOR THE UNITED STATES!
You see ALL the PEOPLE of America are meant to be SOVEREIGNS, which means they are their own rulers of their own lands, beholden to NO ONE in regards to TAXATION! These Sovereigns are the MASTERS of those officials working in government. In other words government officials are to be the serfs and the servants of the PEOPLE (Sovereigns), not the people to be the serfs, servants, and slaves, to the government officials! You see slowly over time everyone has been fooled into believing that the GOVERNMENT has the RIGHT to convert your INHERENT (GOD GIVEN RIGHTS) into privileges for which you must ask for Permission from your MASTER the (GOVERNMENT)!
SOVEREIGNS are standing
up for their RIGHTS and the RIGHTS of others and thus the CROOKS comprised in
the GOVERNMENT and their AGENCIES both hate and fear these PEOPLE. One
generally finds that most Sovereigns are also noted as PATRIOTS, which of
course the said fake government fears and hates as well!
You really want to
screw with these crooks minds?…. Walk up to every government official to
include police officers and sheriffs that you see and say nicely(sweetly) etc
“I am a SOVEREIGN and I just wanted you to know that I love you as a human being. Thus, it’s so sad that you hate America’s Constitution so much that you refuse on a daily basis to uphold your oath of office to defend it! I sincerely pray that one day GOD heals you, thereby restoring both your INTEGRITY and your BACKBONE!”
“GOD BLESS”
Penned by:
Truth and Freedom
Truth and Freedom
12 comments:
part 1
One wrote a ticket DWLI Driving while license invalid on a state ID!
he also added no insurance, just to try to get me to go into their court system.
Clerk sends regular mail hand spelling what I am called on the front of the envelop.
Normally I refuse such things but I had wrote a Motion for Sanctions to get their intention, with the plan to withdraw it before a hearing, because once you withdraw a motion before a hearing, it's a nullity as if it had never been written.
[hey! how else can you make them read your paperwork?]
anyway, I went to withdraw and she said the city attorney had the papers and I was to get mail, should be there by now. I check the mail and instead of writing Refused on it's face like I normally do.
USPS (Direct Mail Manual) DMM 508 Recipient Options
1.1.3 Refusal After Delivery
So I open it and its a freaking subpoena to come to court! Right!
Since I 'never' sign tickets, and returned all ,until I got tired of returning, and every-time I got one, I filed a complaint with the AG, FBI, and FTC to have a public record of their activity (what court will keep a record they'll let anyone else really see?), and AG always sent them a response to my complaint that they would file and ignore.
part 2
I used the Defendant's Motion for Sanctions to get them to look and then pulled it before the hearing with a Defendant's Motion to Withdraw Motion for Sanctions. Nope they were not happy.
Anyway I paid $65 to be able to search fastcase to see appellate decisions and Supreme Court decisions, and believe it or not, and some negatives will not believe it; but there is a ton of case law about our rights, and about elements that need to be proved to make a solid case for a crime, and you learn from the people who appealed and lost, what the judges needed them to argue in the lower courts, that had they done that, they would have won on appeal, and guess what I came across in a ton of words of one decision.
This:
The judge who presides over the court, the clerk who keeps a record of the trial, and the bailiff who performs his duties, are sworn officers, and until their authority to perform their appropriate functions is questioned, their authority to act is assumed. State v. Lane, 222 P.2d 394, 37 Wn.2d 145 (Wash., 1950)
The one appealing had said something like, they don't have authority over me, and appeals court was like, you never challenged their authority and if you did, you started doing what they said do, you answered questions, gave your name, told them things and then wanted to stop.
If they don't have authority and you challenge it, then unless you don't give them authority, they don't have it.
So imagine telling them, you don't have authority over me, and they say, how so? and you answer - Bam, you obviously think they do.
They'll say, do you know what the charges are against you, and you'll say, you don't have authority over me, and they'll say, please explain, and you will, and Bam, you obviously think they do.
The only way to do this is to tell them in writing, probably by playing with a motion that you withdraw and send them a letter giving them so many days to prove up their authority or cease and desist...of course not having signed anything they give you.
If they force you to sign or threaten jail, you can put whatever you want...it can be 'he threatened me' or conspiracy against rights, or 41 USC 1983 or 18 U.S.C. § 242, and your first name only for Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law or 18 U.S.C 241 and your first name only for Conspiracy against Rights, but something if forced so someone would know what you put.
We have remedies, and there's a ton of decisions that say why people didn't win. Put all those pieces together and you got them, but it's pieces, that's why they call it code.
Did you know your ID is financial information? That's why they stop us for stupid shit to get the ID to get the financial information and to hit up the Dept of Transportation and Treasury, and probably IRS making claims using our unreachable trust accounts, and if their stop is illegal, it's identity theft in your state statute, which will tell you, the driver's license and ID card contains financial information.
We are not fictions, they are engaged in identity theft, we don't know it, they get away with it.
peace
Was listening to myprivateaudio on talkshoe and found out about the line you can put into a response and turn it into an affidavit.
I know about it, because I found out prisoners don't always have a notary, so they have a need to make a testimony that is under penalty of perjury to be heard by a court.
I heard that one time a judge suggested someone include an affidavit with their pleading, and they did it as a separate paper, but it can be part of the paperwork, the pleading, the answer, the motion, the injunction, it can be part of it, but which one do you use? There are two.
This information is out there, but people come here, bicker, whine, and act all baby, but get to see their t.v.shows and stuff, but you look at 28 U.S.C. 1746, and one oath keeps you a 14th amendment citizen within the United States of America and the other verify under penalty of perjury puts you outside.
And it has to be exact, you can't just put Date: May 18, 2016, you have to put Executed on date: May 28, 2016.
Executed has it's own meaning.
Their world is very tricky and you can get the word you are called, pretty muddy in their system.
Oh, and another thing, I looked in Washington State code, it's called RCW.
in RCW 1.40.010, it says the state of Washington (yes state is lower case) would have a seal called The Great Seal of the State of Washington -- yes the lower case state can use a seal saying upper case state, but that's just a word on a seal for the lower case state.
The Washington Constitution says the people with the Divine Powers of the Source or something like that, but has State of Washington.
So the coded legal fiction that the legislatures use to create a sub state is state of Washington using a seal that says State of Washington, but the code tells you it's not the constitution State because it belongs to the code state.
AND the suit in a municipality is STATE OF WASHINGTON and that entity does not exist in any code anywhere, so who are they suing for, or did the people or will the people fall for the deception, walk into their rooms where they have all the rules to the came and like the Hotel California you can't leave until the game is over, or like movie, Jumanji, if you get caught in the game, you are stuck until someone rolls a dice to release you.
There is a lot more to learn, however let's get back to the so called Constitutional sheriff. The one and only question that needs to be answered is how many slaves does he have locked up in his dungeon where there is or was no victim or injured party?
I'm listening!
The 1998 public hwy safety act gave the states the 10 amendment right to regulate there own traffic and commerce. Unless you have the original notarized Certificate of Origin on the car, you don't own it. The car has a "Vehicle" identification number from the factory. Its a commercial vehicle. If you have any State issued ID you are considered a U.S. corporation. You can't use their codes or argue in their court as you are not a BAR member. To use the trust's property (the roads) you have to get permission from the trustees, pay some sort of colorable consideration to become a beneficiary and then receive their permission (license), otherwise you are guilty of unjust enrichment. To be sovereign, you have to own property and be recognized legally. Property ownership is illegal in America. The statute of Mortmain, circa. 1206 AD states that only the church and trusts can own property. That is still law today. What you need to be asking is do I have a SSN? If you do then you are a U.S. corporate employee under their jurisdiction and the codes apply to you. Your only response should be: I do not understand this jurisdiction, I am not a U.S. corporation, I am not a trustee or surety over the IMF account that the charges are being brought against. I am not the nom-deguere corporation named on the court document, I am not a 14 amendment citizen as the 14 amendment was never ratified. I cannot enter a plea as the indicting document is insufficient as it fails to cite any organic constitutional law containing a title and an enacting clause. The plaintiff is a bankrupt fiction and the prosecuting attorney is not a trustee assigned by the bankruptcy court to bring charges for or against the STATE. Therefore their is no plaintiff in the court room to testify so the charges must be dismissed as there is no organic law before this court that applies to me for which the court can render a decision on, and I am not an attorney that can represent or enter a plea on behalf of the corporate defendant named on the account. As far as I am concerned, if you are dragging me into your jurisdiction under threat then I move for dismissal for lack of plaintiff and my own sovereign immunity as a foreign entity to your corporate forum under 28 USC section 1603 the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act. If the State can claim immunity against prosecution as a USC Title 20 foreign corporation under 28 USC section 1608, then I am immune also as a foreign entity to this corporate tribunal. You also have to return the ticket within three days certified refusing their invitation to court. You cannot argue anything before their court. "If you have or use a SSN you are under their jurisdiction according to them and everything you do affects commerce therefore your actions are commercial as they see it!!" Good luck. Some wars are not worth fighting.
Confession and Avoidence !!!
Plead guilty to the facts and accept any and all charges for value and return it for discharge settlement and closure of the account. Your statement on and for the record.
Yers truely.
Lucifer...
Simply answering a question does not grant jurisdiction, that is a trick. Jurisdiction exists as a matter of law, they either have it or they don't. Simply answering a question in their presence does not grant jurisdiction.
Why is that the one and only question?
How many times has that worked?
Great clear concise treatise, Truth & Freedom! Related Solution for good of ALL - Amazing news for a Momentous Memorial Day celebration: "... official announcement of our restored Republic and new currency expected later Monday evening to commemorate Memorial Day--a fitting tribute to the brave men and women who so faithfully and patriotically served our country... living in historic times, you are actively participating in the restoration of your country through the redemption of your currency! So enjoy your blessing and remember that service, surrender and humility are the timeless hallmarks of a joy filled life. God is with us." Excerpted from http://inteldinarchronicles.blogspot.com/2016/05/history-was-made-sitrep-080000-est.html
It's called testifying.
Complicated yes, that's why Eddie Craig (rule of law radio) says
Shut up
Keep shutting up
and shut up some more
There are different jurisdictions, specific, general, long-arm, equity
In Washington, a court may exercise personal jurisdiction over a nonresident defendant by asserting either general or specific jurisdiction. Van Steenwyk v. Interamerican Mgmt. Consulting Corp., 834 F. Supp. 336, 339 (E.D. Wash. 1993)
General jurisdiction over a nonresident defendant is proper when the defendant's actions in the state are so substantial and continuous that justice allows the exercise of jurisdiction even for claims not arising from the defendant's contacts within the state. Raymond, 104 Wn. App. at 633. RCW 4.28.080(10) authorizes general jurisdiction over a nonresident defendant if the defendant is transacting substantial and continuous business within the state of such character as to give rise to a legal obligation. Im Ex Trading Co., 92 Wn. App. at 535. In
making this determination, courts look to the amount, kind, and continuity of activities carried out by the nonresident in Washington. Bartusch v. Oregon State Bd. of Higher Educ., 131 Wn. App. 298, 304, 126 P.3d 840 (2006).
Specific Jurisdiction Schumacher argues in the alternative that specific jurisdiction exists under Washington's long-arm statute, RCW 4.28.185,
(1) Any person, whether or not a citizen or resident of this state, who in person or
through an agent does any of the acts in this section enumerated, thereby submits said
person . . . to the jurisdiction of the courts of this state as to any cause of action arising from the doing of any of said acts:
(a) The transaction of any business within this state[.] RCW 4.28.185(1)(a) (emphasis added).
Long-arm jurisdiction standards are less stringent than those necessary to establish general jurisdiction. Bartusch, 131 Wn. App. at 306. To prove that specific jurisdiction exists,
Schumacher must establish three factors: (1) IMG must have purposefully done some act or consummated some transaction in this state; (2) the cause of action must arise from, or be connected with, such act or transaction; and (3) the exercise of jurisdiction must not offend traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice. Shute v. Carnival Cruise Lines, 113
Wn.2d 763, 767, 783 P.2d 78 (1989); see also Grange Ins. Ass'n v. State, 110 Wn.2d 752, 758, 757 P.2d 933 (1988) (referring to the state and similarly worded federal tests as "the due process test").
Above three jurisdiction definitions are in this case I found on fastcase.
Schumacher v. IMG Group, LLC, No. 37721-7-II (Wash. App. 7/7/2009) (Wash. App., 2009)
There's a ton of tricks and I'm only showing a few.
I don't know who to credit with the three rules of survival but I heard it on myprivateaudio on talkshoe.com
three rules of survival
don't say anything
keep your mouth shut
and shut up
A party has standing to file suit if it can demonstrate (1) an "injury in fact", i.e., harm suffered by the Plaintiff that is concret and actual or imminent, not merely conjectural or hypothetical; (2) causation, i.e., a fairly traceable connection between the Plaintiff's purported injury and the complained-of-conduct of the defendant; and (3) redressability, i.e., a likelihood that the requested relief will redress the alleged injury. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a better Env't, 523 U.S. 82, 102, 118 S.Ct. 1003, 1016 (1998)
Post a Comment