DHS is more of a threat to the people of the US than all the other agencies of the gov combined

Reader: "DHS is more of a threat to the people of the US than all the other agencies of the gov combined"

Posted By: hobie [Send E-Mail]
Date: Sunday, 27-Jan-2013 16:42:34

In Response To: DHS wants full auto .223 weapons for "Personal Defense" (ilikai)

(Thanks, o-a-f. :) Reader "old and foggy" writes: *************************************************************************** If ?Assault Weapons? Are Bad?Why Does DHS Want.... perhaps people are not aware that the DHS is more of a threat to the people of the US than all the other agencies of the gov combined, it is the fastest growing entity in the government, it seems to be taking over all enforcement of travel, security, immigration, collection of personal information, and none of the employees are bound by an oath to the constitution like the armed forces and police,they are just hired help aka- "thugs in uniform" who have no elegance to anyone or anything other than the one who pays them, and I have to wonder just who they are protecting, it looks avery much like the old Russian KGB on steroids they are the last people I would actually put in charge of homeland security judging by the record of the tsa which is part of them, it seems as though these people are hiring anybody off the street to do "the security" and most seem to be the criminal element, and if their system is so bad that they do not do thorough background checks why would they arm them with assault rifles, I really fear that "comrade Nepolitano" will bring all other agencies cia, fbi, tsa, ect under this one organization and make them all subservient to her office, when this happens, you can kiss "all" your freedoms goodbye, as the constitution will no longer be of use to restrain the government because it will be all done in the name of "homeland security" but again "who's homeland" if its not done to protect "we the people who live on the land", then it is done "to restrain we the people who live on the land" and therefore they would be protecting something or somebody from "we the people who live on the land" and you dont need two guesses as to who they will be protecting, and it wont be "we the people" *************************************************************************** DHS wants full auto .223 weapons for "Personal Defense" Posted By: ilikai Date: Sunday, 27-Jan-2013 09:22:24 Whats good for the goose is not good for the gander,I guess. Makes you wonder who is afraid of who more, the government or the populace. **************************************************************** If ‘Assault Weapons’ Are Bad…Why Does DHS Want to Buy 7,000 of Them for ‘Personal Defense’? *snip* Citing a General Service Administration (GSA) request for proposal (RFP), Steve McGough of RadioViceOnline.com reports that DHS is asking for the 7,000 “select-fire” firearms because they are “suitable for personal defense use in close quarters.” The term select-fire means the weapon can be both semi-automatic and automatic. Civilians are prohibited from obtaining these kinds of weapons. *snip* http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/01/26/if-assault-weapons-are-bad-why-does-the-dhs-want-to-buy-7000-of-them-for-personal-defense/ http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=267689