Is martial law imminent?
A somewhat disturbing ad recently appeared on
internet employment sites, the
ad in question was placed by
the National Guard. Apparently, the Guard is now looking for people to work at internment camps.
Here
is the ad as it appeared:
"Correction Officer Internment / Resettlement
Specialist"
"As
an Internment/Resettlement Specialist for the Army National Guard, you will
ensure the smooth running of military confinement/correctional facility or
detention/internment facility, similar to those duties conducted by civilian
Corrections Officers. This will require you to know proper procedures and
military law; and have the ability to think quickly in high-stress situations.
Specific duties may include assisting with supervision and management
operations; providing facility security; providing custody, control,
supervision, and escort; and counseling individual prisoners in rehabilitative
programs."
So, why is the National Guard hiring "Internment / Resettlement
Specialists?"
On
October 17, 2006, President Bush signed into law, the John Warner Defense Authorization
Act. The new law allows the President to declare a "public emergency"
at his own discretion, and place federal troops anywhere throughout the United
States. Under this law, the President also now has the authority to federalize
National Guard troops without the consent of Governors, in order to restore
"public order." The President can now deploy federal troops to U.S.
cities, at will, which eliminates the 1878 Posse Comitatus Act. In short,
President Obama can now declare Martial Law anytime he pleases.
An
Excerpt from the John Warner Defense Authorization Act follows:
"Use
of the Armed Forces in Major Public Emergencies." Section 333, "Major
public emergencies; interference with State and Federal law" states that
"the President may employ the armed forces, including the National Guard
in Federal service, to restore public order and enforce the laws of the United
States when, as a result of a natural disaster, epidemic, or other serious
public health emergency, terrorist attack or incident, or other condition in
any State or possession of the United States, the President determines that
domestic violence has occurred to such an extent that the constituted
authorities of the State or possession are incapable of ("refuse" or
"fail" in) maintaining public order, "in order to suppress, in
any State, any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or
conspiracy."
On
October 1, 2008 the U.S. Army´s 1st Brigade of the 3rd Infantry Division began
their stateside mission under U.S. Northern Command. It was the first time that
an active duty Army unit has been assigned this type of mission. They are known
as the CBRNE Consequence Management Response Force. They are responsible for
responding to terrorist attacks, and restoring order in case of civil unrest.
Among supposed humanitarian duties, their specific job is to provide
crowd and traffic control, and to subdue unruly or dangerous individuals
without killing them.
Rep.
Brad Sherman (D-CA) seems to have answered this question, though the press has
largely ignored the stunning information he divulged.
Congressman
Sherman on the House floor told his colleagues and the C-SPAN cameras alike:
"Many of us were told in private conversations that if we voted against
this bill on Monday that the sky would fall, the market would drop two or three
thousand points the first day, another couple thousand points the second day,
and a few members were even told that there would be martial law in America if
we voted no."
Additionally,
a very troubling report came out in August 2007, when KSLA-12 in Shreveport,
Louisiana reported that members of the clergy have been enrolled in a federal
education program, which teaches them how to "quell dissent" amongst
their congregations. So-called Clergy Response Teams are being trained by FEMA
to convince people to follow government orders, in the event of martial law.
The evidence that we the people, are at risk of being placed under
martial law, and losing all of our rights as guaranteed by the Constitution is
overwhelming.
Thirty
years ago, we enjoyed the benefits of a press which took their responsibility
to the public very seriously. Any signs pointing to the implementation of
martial law and criminal actions committed by the federal government would have
drawn the attention of our journalists.
However,
in the age of "imbedded reporters," and 90-minute network
infomercials complete with anchors promoting government healthcare, our press
has a much-too cozy relationship with those in government. A complicit press is
making it very easy for our government to erode civil liberties.
Much,
Much more to this story here.
2 comments:
This is months old and is pure scare tactics and fear mongering ! They are scared of us !!
that's right - they know when we all wake up we will mow them down
+ they keep trying to brainwash us with "our rights as guaranteed by the Constitution" - NO they're not - it's in the
con-stitution to tell us our unalienable rights are from God + CAN'T be taken away =unless we give them away
Post a Comment