Obama Violated Constitution – Abuse of Power, So Says Federal Appeals Court: 3 NLRB Appointments
Unconstitutional
January 25, 2013
By Maggie
Obama’s three “recess appointments” to the National Labor
Relations Board (NLRB) have been ruled unconstitutional by a federal appeals
court because Congress WAS NOT in official recess. The NRLB is required to have
five members to effect a quorum, but had only two before the unconstitutional
appointments were made. After the appointments, but with today’s decision,
there officially remains only two members, so all decisions coming out the NRLB
since that time, said to be hundreds (view them here),
should be ruled unlawful, if justice is applied to the court decision. Another
similar appointment of Richard Cordray to the head position of the Consumer
Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) should now be rendered unconstitutional as
well.
When G.W. was President and Obama was a U.S. Senator from
Illinois, Obama publicly criticized Bush’s recess appointment of John Bolton to
U.N. Ambassador. The problem for Obama then was, Congress was actually in
recess. Not so when he made his NRLB and Cordray appointments. Obama’s more
current problem is finding appointees which Congress will actually vote for in
the numbers needed for confirmation. It’s the American way.
The
lawsuit was brought by Noel Canning, a family-owned Yakima, Washington bottling
company, which complained the NLRB unfairly ruled in favor of Teamsters Local
760 during contract negotiations. Noel said the board lacked a binding quorum
because the recess appointments made by Obama were not legal.
“Small-business
owners throughout the country have suffered under the unabashedly pro-union
decisions handed down by the NLRB,” said Karen Harned, executive director of
the National Federation of Independent Business, which filed an amicus brief in
the case. “They deserve to be protected from unconstitutional acts that
exacerbate the NLRB’s devolution from a neutral arbiter between labor and
employers to a pro-union government agency.”
The Obama administration says they will now move the case to the
Supreme Court, but to do that, SCOTUS has to agree to take up what amounts to
the unionizing of American workers. Graphic courtesy of Winds of Jihad.
4 comments:
Obama has nothing to do with the Constitution! He is president of the Corporation only!
Obama violated the constitution, "which time"?
So??? Either way you look at it, it is called FRAUD. The people didn't elect him, nor are they paying him at a helluva price, to be president of a behind-the-scenes corporation. They elected him thinking he was their constitutional president. And, if the truth be known, there was so much fraud involved in the election, he was not lawfully elected but thrust on the people by scumbag demoRAT Marxist and other criminals!!
Ok.. I have to say this....there are a lot of people that realize that not only did Obama violate and continues to violate the Constitution but so did many presidents/CEO's before him. Most everyone knows that DC is a foreign Corporation that is controlled by its parent corporation the UN... so if people know this already, "how many are building their de jure republic in their local communities to form a de jure state republic?" If our de jure republic is not put back in place how does anyone hope to be free of the defacto corporate rule?
Jural assemblies and De Jure Grand Juries need to be formed in local communiites, of, by,and for the people. Then these jural assemblies of people can go to the local government offices and give them notice to stop the agenda 21/sustainable developement project in their twp,city, or county. They can demand the fluroide be discontued..this is key to more people becoming active. Take back your schools and kick the social programming out of them, don't listen to the crap that it is state mandated... get parents together and keep your children home on the monthly head count day and see if you don't get their attention!r
Enough already of this continued repeat of corruption concerning the defacto corporate government that usurped our de jure republic. It's starting to sound like a daytime soap opera that everyone is addicted to.
How much more information does everyone need to figure out the solution?
The solution is in plain sight and is not difficult, although those that study law would tend to make you believe it is...hint...read your Declaration of Independence...and your Bill of Rights...we do not need to study law to take back our country because our de jure republic is of, by, and for the people in our simple language according to our plain ol' Websters dictionary. We cannot and should not attempt to use their LEGAL UCC system and perversion of our language to restore our freedom...by attempting to do so you are acknowledging its authorityover you.
We need to take back our local government offices first, starting with the sheriff.
The free de jure state of Michigan has a ratified revised 1835 constitution that allows for a "recall" of all elected officials that are not doing their duty to serve the people, but it takes the support of the people to give it power.
People power through lawful means is all it takes. Forget the legal crap that everyone is spewing. Yes, if you want personal remedy then by all means do your legal UCC stuff, but if you are interested in true freedom equally for everyone then all you need to do is free your thoughts first and start thinking like the free person you are and reach out face to face with others in your community with peaceful resolve and say, no more! If you alone gain remedy from the system that is all you have but if all are made free then we truly are free.
The financial UCC System needs to be separated in your mind from your RIGHTS, they are completely different concepts. It is the intimidation and fear that is keeping you enslaved and lack of information about your lawful de jure republic.
God forgive us and save America, for she is adrift at sea!
www.michiganfreedejurestate.us/news.html
Post a Comment