Alaska Goes Tenther: Governor Signs HB 69 to Nullify NDAA Indefinite Detention,Federal Gun Laws, and REAL ID Act
by ASERAG.
“The Tenth Amendment to the
Constitution of the United States guarantees to the states and their
people all powers not granted to the federal government elsewhere in the
constitution and reserves to the state and people of Alaska certain
powers as they were intended at the time that Alaska was admitted to
statehood in 1959; the guaranty of those powers is a matter of contract
between the state and people of Alaska and the United States as of the time
that the compact with the United States was agreed to and adopted by Alaska and
the United States in 1959….” -SECTION
1 (2B)
Following the hard work of Alaskans, the legislature, and Americans
around the country, and with one swift signature from Alaskan Governor Sean
Parnell, HB 69 has:- Made Alaska the second state to successfully complete the nullification of the national defense authorization act’s sections 1021 and 1022
- Declared tyrannical federal gun laws infringing upon the 2nd amendment enumerated Rights unenforceable and unconstitutional, including barring any state resources or participation
- Stopped and forbidden any participation or implementation of the REAL ID Act / National ID program
“The harder the conflict, the
more glorious the triumph” -Thomas Paine
The signed legislation, Alaska
HB 69, which is now officially law, is summarized:
“Prohibiting state and municipal
agencies from using assets to implement or aid in the implementation of the
requirements of certain federal statutes, regulations, rules, and orders
that are applied to infringe on a person’s right to bear arms or right to
due process or that implement or aid in the implementation of the federal
REAL ID Act of 2005; exempting certain firearms, firearm accessories, and
ammunition in this state from federal regulation; declaring certain
federal statutes, regulations, rules, and orders unconstitutional under the
Constitution of the United States and unenforceable in this state;
requiring the attorney general to file any legal action to prevent
implementation of a federal statute, regulation, rule, or order that violates
the rights of a resident of the state; and providing for an effective date.”
The new Alaskan law forbids the use of any state resources or
employees to enforce NDAA’s sections 1021 and 1022, which Unconstitutionally
authorized the executive power to arrest and imprison Americans indefinitely
and without due process, and authorized the executive branch to utilize the
military to arrest Americans in violation of the Section 1, Article 9,
enumerated Right to a writ of Habeas Corpous, among at-least 5 enumerated
Rights within the Bill of Rights. The text you should surely note is that NDAA
section 1022 does not say Americans must be arrested by the military, but
instead says that they are not required to be arrested by the
military.NDAA Section 1021:
“Congress affirms that the authority of the President to use all necessary and appropriate force pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force . . . includes the authority for the Armed Forces of the United States to detain covered persons . . . pending disposition under the law of war.”
NDAA Section 1022:
“…The requirement to detain a person in military custody under this section does not extend to citizens of the United States.”
No worries here folks, the federal government isn’t required to violate your Rights in the process of violating your Rights, so everything is fine, because government would never utilize more power for its pursuit of tyranny if it isn’t explicitly required to do so…excluding the last 200+ years…
And since the feds never planned on using these sections, or so they’ve claimed, Alaska has actually helped make the American system of law-or whatever it has become now-more efficient, by blockading the federal enforcement of these sections.
As Jefferson claimed within the Kentucky Resolution, States ”have the right, and are in duty bound, to interpose, for arresting the progress of the evil, and for maintaining, within their respective limits, the authorities, rights and liberties, appertaining to them.”
In that same spirit, Alaska HB 69 declares Alaska’s agreement with the federal government subject to its agreement with Alaskan residents and oath to protect the 2nd amendment enumerated Right to bear arms:
“A personal firearm, a firearm accessory, or ammunition that is possessed in this state or manufactured commercially or privately in this state and that remains in the state is not subject to federal law or federal regulation, including registration, under the authority of the United States Congress to regulate interstate commerce as those items have not traveled in interstate commerce.” -Section 3(a)
In relation to gun law, HB 69 effectively:
- forbids any state participation in federal laws violating the 2nd amendment
- clarifies that any assumed powers by the federal government in relation to intrastate commerce does not include the regulation, registration, or confiscation of Alaskan firearms, ammunition, and related parts and accessories
- lists the direct violations of the 2nd, 9th, and 10th amendments by the federal gun prohibition agenda
- Compels the Alaskan Attorney General to take necessary legal action to prevent implementation of Unconstitutional federal statutes and laws
“A state or municipal agency may
not use or authorize the use of an asset to implement or aid in the
implementation
of a requirement of An order of the President of the United States, a federal regulation, or a law enacted by the United States Congress that is applied to deny a person a right to due process, or a protection of due process, that would otherwise be available to the person under the Constitution of the State of Alaska or the Constitution of the United States; or REAL ID Act of 2005″
Legislation striking down three groups of tyrannical federal laws may be
common in house or senate bills that don’t make it past the committees or one
majority leader, but what Alaska just did was convince their governor to
literally stop and forbid any state resources funding these programs, make a
legal and public statement on the recognition of Constitutionally-enumerated
Rights, and employ state resources such as the Attorney General to instead be
used to defend Alaskans and their Rights, instead of assist the feds in
attacking them, all the while accomplishing a large step in a “first-investors”
situation that will only motivate more and more states to pass similar
legislation, now that Virginia and Alaska are the first-invested.of a requirement of An order of the President of the United States, a federal regulation, or a law enacted by the United States Congress that is applied to deny a person a right to due process, or a protection of due process, that would otherwise be available to the person under the Constitution of the State of Alaska or the Constitution of the United States; or REAL ID Act of 2005″
Congratulations Alaskans!
The courageous Alaskan State Representatives and Senators who sponsored the HB 69 legislation can be thanked through the legislature’s website and are as follows:
- REPRESENTATIVE(S): Chenault, Millett, Johnson, T.Wilson, Hawker, Olson, Feige, P.Wilson, Thompson, Keller, Gattis, Lynn, Saddler, Higgins, LeDoux, Foster, Hughes, Stoltze, Reinbold, Tuck, Neuman, Isaacson
- SENATOR(S): Giessel, Meyer, Micciche
Find out how the Tenth Amendment Center can help your state accomplish what Virginia and Alaska have.
Ahmed Serag
No comments:
Post a Comment