CEO
PAY GOES UP
Overpaid?
Or Worth Every Penny?
By THE EDITORIAL BOARD
Published: July 13, 2013
Major
corporate filings for 2012 have now provided an updated
portrait of
executive pay. The
median compensation of chief executives at 200 of the
nation’s biggest public
companies came in at $15.1 million last year, a
16
percent
jump from 2011, according to Equilar, the executive compensation
analysis
firm. The pay packages —
including salary, bonus, benefits, stock
and option grants —
ranged from $96.2 million at Oracle to $11.1 million
at General Motors.
Is that excessive? One way to answer that question would be to look at
the pay gap, the ratio
of the pay of the chief executive to that of the
company’s employees. But
nobody really knows what the gaps are. Three
years after passage of
the Dodd-Frank financial reform law requiring companies
to disclose the gaps,
the Securities and Exchange Commission has not even
proposed rules to put
the provision into effect. Nor has Congress or the
administration pressed
the agency to get on with the job.
The pay gap information has many potential uses. It could help
investors judge the effect of a company’s pay structure on
productivity,
efficiency, innovation
and other aspects of work-force performance. It
could also help
consumers determine whether companies are solid
corporate citizens or
sources of enrichment of the few. And it could help
economists and policy
makers detect emerging asset bubbles and
impending crashes, which
generally correlate with rising income
disparities.
But corporations don’t want any of that. To hear them tell it,
computing the pay gap is
too hard. Nonsense. The real obstacle is
that
many chief executives do not want to have to
defend what are sure to
be some indefensibly large gaps.
There is no doubt that
the gaps are huge. Using government data
on worker pay, the Economic Policy Institute has calculated that the
ratio
of C.E.O. pay to employee pay was 273 to 1 in 2012, or
202
to 1, depending on how stock
options were accounted for. Either
way, that is far
higher than it has been for most of the past 50 years.
What remains unknown, however, is which specific corporations are
driving the gaps. That is the information investors and consumers
need to fight
effectively against executive pay packages that are
unjustifiable and
disadvantageous.
Corporate executives also resisted pay disclosure when the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934
first required public companies to report C.E.O.
compensation. That law helped to establish corporate norms
that long
endured, in which
executive pay was a more modest multiple of employee
pay. Those norms, weakened through time, could be
reinforced with pay
gap disclosure, but only if politicians and
regulators find the courage to
follow
through.
:
|
Use
your masterful powers of thought,
visualization and verbal intent to
Co-create a peaceful world now...
visualization and verbal intent to
Co-create a peaceful world now...
No comments:
Post a Comment