FAA
Asks: Please Don't Shoot Down the Drones
Abby Ohlheiser
Earlier this
week, one Colorado town floated
the idea of letting its residents buy hunting permits for drones. Now, the
FAA has responded to the proposal by telling Americans to please stop thinking
about shooting down drones.
The proposal
itself sounds more like a clever way to get Rand Paul-type libertarians to
donate to a local government budget than a viable way to protect a town from
federal drones. According to the draft of the proposed ordinance, residents
of Deer Trail, Colorado could pay $25 a year for a drone hunting permit.
And there's a $100 reward for any successful downed drone, providing the
unmanned aerial vehicle's "markings and configuration are
consistent with those used on any similar craft known to be owned or operated
by the United States federal government." The man behind the Deer Trail proposal, who seems to be one of the few people in the town taking it seriously, knows the idea is against the law, but doesn't really care. Phillip Steel, speaking to CNN, said "Is it illegal? Of course it is. But it's also illegal to spy on American citizens...If they fly in town, we will shoot them down."
The FAA, too, is taking the idea very, very seriously, it seems. The agency, which is already behind schedule to meet a 2015 deadline for new regulations governing drone use in the U.S., released a statement reminding Deer Trail that the federal agency is responsible for regulating the air space over the town, and indicating that they'd enforce existing laws to punish any enterprising drone hunters in Colorado or anywhere else. Here's the AP, quoting from the statement:
A drone "hit by gunfire could crash, causing damage to persons or property on the ground, or it could collide with other objects in the air," the statement said. "Shooting at an unmanned aircraft could result in criminal or civil liability, just as would firing at a manned airplane."
But until the FAA integrates drones into the national airspace, however, the residents of Deer Trail won't have very much "game" out there to shoot down. The FAA hasn't been terribly transparent about the number of unmanned aircraft flights they've authorized in the U.S., but we do know of a few government agencies who do, or who have in the past, used drones to patrol American soil. The Customs and Border Protection, for instance, have stepped up their drone game dramatically recently, even conducting drone missions on behalf of other agencies. And a North Dakota town apparently used a drone on loan from the Department of Homeland Security to catch a cattle thief in 2012.
Want to add to this story? Let us know in comments or send an email to the author at aohlheiser@theatlantic.com
5 comments:
F THE FAA.
...And EFF ALL the REST of the Alphabets...they're all staffed with mindless drones and treasonous running dogs.
TOTALLY AGREE with Anon 9:21
One CO town is considering a bounty on shooting down any drone flying over their town. This sounds as good as hunting season. HaHa!
The Drone are here to rule or kill us not to protect us, we have a Banking Government aimed on ruling or killing us all. If not how about having them tell us what the hell are the Drones for....and for that matter how about the Chemtrail fly over on us. Bottom line Bankers rule this country here is their montra, for real, it comes right after the Bankers Manafesto, as follows; Rags make Paper...Paper makes money... money makes Banks... Banks make loans... loans make poverty... Poverty makes Rags. Now if you have the stomach for it Read the Bankers Manifesto,. witten 1892.
Prove they are not here to control or to kill Americans. PROVE IT !!!!
Post a Comment