One Single Petition
Could End OBAMA-CARE “HR 3590”
ARE WE READY TO RUMBLE?
“Obama-care was ruled unconstitutional,
not once, but twice!
The U.S. Constitution is specific… all
revenue creating bills must originate in the House of Representatives.
There are no less than 19 violations of
the U.S. Constitution contained in Obama-Care (HR 3590).”
Commentary by:
Mr. Nicholas Purpura
What prompted me to write this article is the continual
moaning over Obama-care. Listening to talk radio, the topic of the day was the
“Death Panels”. Yes, there is a death panel that not even Congress has the
authority override in the current legislation. It’s time for a wake-up call!
What if I told you, Obama-care was ruled
unconstitutional, not once, but twice! Yes twice; and not a single legal scholar, attorney or
judge has had the courage to publicly or legally reveal this to the nation.
It is my intention to be deliberately insulting to get
everyone’s attention and at the same time embarrass the reprobates in Congress
that failed in their fiduciary duty to read the “Bill” and especially publicize
the charade by the 26 Attorneys General who supposedly represented the citizens
of their respective states.
Obama-care by law, could have been legally abolished
following the ruling in Florida by the Hon. Roger Vinson. In fact, it could still, even now, be eliminated in one
simple legal action. Please read on and you will understand my disdain for our
despicable legislators.
One would think
that 26 Attorneys General who had instituted a multi-state legal action against
Obama-care, would be well versed in constitutional law. If one did think that,
he'd be mighty wrong. Instead of being powerful legal eagles, these 26 AG's
proved to be nothing more than useless “yellow” canaries. Not a single one of
those morons realized or possibly even cared, that if followed up, the above
mentioned ruling by Judge Vinson in the Florida v. U.S. Department of
Health &Human Service, would have effectively ended Obama-care
The fact is, both sides of the Health-care controversy
requested the court address the legislative history of the bill. Justice Vinson
concluded and set forth in his decision that the “bill” originated in the U.S.
Senate. His Honor also stated that the bill contained taxes, thereby
sealing the fate of Obama-care. By law, his ruling, rendered the bill
unconstitutional.
But did any of the 26 AG's bother to present this evidence
to the Supreme Court? Understanding the
cost and time and effort that had been expended on this law suit, it is
astonishing that they either overlooked or ignored that ruling. Incompetence
and buffoonery really cannot address this. The only thing that does make sense,
is the lawsuit they collaborated in, was just a charade to display in front of
their constituents. What else could describe why they would ignore truly potent
ammunition when it was handed to them on a silver platter?
On appeal before the U.S. Supreme Court, that disparate
group of black robed extorted pretenders and leftist ideologues, also ruled
that Obama-care contained new taxes. For a second time, the door to the pathway
of ending this legislation was left open. But not one AG had the courage to
proceed through the threshold.
The fact is, all three levels of the Federal Court system
either failed or refused to apply the clear and convincing evidence standard. That application is termed “law of the case”. Justice
Vinson, established the ‘law of the case” when he found that Obama-care,
originated in the Senate.
Where have I been going with this? Once again our Founding
Fathers, in their brilliance wrote into the Constitution a means to halt
tyranny. The U.S. Constitution is specific concerning which body of Congress
has the authority to institute legislation that creates a new tax. It is
unambiguous and explicit. All revenue
creating bills must originate in the House of Representatives.
Here is how its written:
Article 1, section 7, paragraph 1 …all revenue bills must
originate in the House of Representatives. No provision exists that grants the
Senate authority to originate a revenue raising bill.
Even more frustrating, the Court was informed that Congress
was guilty of fraud in the passage of this legislation. With “fraudulent
intent’ the House took an unrelated House Bill –HR 3590, titled the “Service
Members Ownership Act of 2009” extracted the entire contents and replaced it
with the Senate version of ‘Healthy Future Act' (S 1796) a precursor of the Act
giving it the appearance of legality. Thereafter, behind closed doors they
renamed the “Service Members Ownership Tax Act of 2009” and then re-titled
“Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act” surreptitiously to acquire a
“House Designation Number”.
Two additional facts on why this was done quickly and
illegally. First, the Democrats were fearful of a Republican filibuster
following the election of Scott Brown (R), who replaced Senator Ted (the swimmer)
Kennedy. Second, both the Senate and House were fully aware they were
circumventing the law. Approximately a month prior, the Senate drafted (S 510)
which contained revenue raising provisions and that bill had to be rewritten
by the House of Representatives.
Following the Supreme Court ruling, not one of the 26
Attorneys General followed up or even took the time to respond to a letter
prepared by www.TPATH.org (*see copy of
letter below) informing them of the tax raising violation,.
Also, the Hoodlums in Black-Robes in the NJ District, Third
Circuit and Supreme Court of the United States refused to address the evidence
that proved Obama-care was unconstitutional. So you may ask, why the heck will
no one bring a legal action. This issue is still ripe for review. As they say,
blackmail and corruption are a way of life in Washington D.C.
Echelon, PRISM and the NSA, just might be controlling
factors.
America! A midterm election in 2014 is around the corner.
Is it not time to throw every incumbent out of office and elect men and women
of moral character?
I leave you with the words of Nikita Khrushchev:
“You Americans are so stupid that we can spit in your
eye and you think it is falling dew.”
There are no less than 19 violations of the U.S.
Constitution contained in Obama-Care “HR 3590” and my previous
invitation to every law professor, judge, and attorney still stands – Do you
have the courage to publicly debate me? I think not, since I have put forth
this challenge since 2010.
Please call your Representative and ask if
what you read here is true,
and just what the heck they are going to about it!
and just what the heck they are going to about it!
* Copy of letter TPATH sent to the 26
AG's just days after the Supreme Court ruling.
July
1, 2012
Dear State Attorney
General,
The
Supreme Court ruling this past week which declared the bill known as Obamacare
to be constitutional was as shocking as it was egregious. If the
Republicans do not get control of the Senate and or if Obama is re-elected,
this country may never recover from the scope and breadth of this bill.
It will do no good to spend any time wondering why Justice Roberts ruled as he did. Nor will it serve any endeavor to use valuable time name calling and venting. What we need is a plan, beyond the expectations of November, and we need to implement it quickly.
I just finished watching three state AG's on Huckabee's Fox program (you know who you are) as they discussed possible plans for continuing the fight. It had been my hope that Article I of the Constitution would come up and be discussed. Alas, it did not. As a result TPATH has decided to contact each of the 26 State AG's in an effort to get some attention on the breach of Article I, Section 7.
As each of you are aware, this ruling can be challenged if it is done so with in 30 days of the ruling. That will give you until Friday, July 27th to join together with a formal appeal and official notification. From what I understand, an appeal can be made provided there is new evidence which was not considered or litigated during the process.
The basis for new evidence was produced by none other than Chief Justice Roberts, himself. His opinion and ruling that the healthcare bill was a tax bill, brought new evidence to the law suit. In fact, its now the law. SCOTUS says its a tax bill. So, its a tax bill.
It is the opinion of TPATH as well as all of our researchers and contributors, immediately upon ruling Obamacare a tax bill, Roberts could have and probably should have, ruled it unconstitutional under the constraints of Article I, Section 7 of the Constitution.
Just a small review of the history of the Senate Healthcare bill which is the one being challenged. This bill was written and produced by the Senate and by use of reconciliation passed it on to Obama's desk. So not only was this bill not produced by the the House of Representatives as required by Article I, Section 7, but it was never voted on by the full House.
The bottom line is, the Healthcare Bill was deemed unconstitutional, in its entirety, the instant that Roberts declared it a tax bill. Taxes cannot be raised by the US Senate.
TPATH hopes you will take this into consideration. This fight to save America from this over reach of the Federal Government, is not over.
Regards,
Dwight Kehoe
www.tpath.org
It will do no good to spend any time wondering why Justice Roberts ruled as he did. Nor will it serve any endeavor to use valuable time name calling and venting. What we need is a plan, beyond the expectations of November, and we need to implement it quickly.
I just finished watching three state AG's on Huckabee's Fox program (you know who you are) as they discussed possible plans for continuing the fight. It had been my hope that Article I of the Constitution would come up and be discussed. Alas, it did not. As a result TPATH has decided to contact each of the 26 State AG's in an effort to get some attention on the breach of Article I, Section 7.
As each of you are aware, this ruling can be challenged if it is done so with in 30 days of the ruling. That will give you until Friday, July 27th to join together with a formal appeal and official notification. From what I understand, an appeal can be made provided there is new evidence which was not considered or litigated during the process.
The basis for new evidence was produced by none other than Chief Justice Roberts, himself. His opinion and ruling that the healthcare bill was a tax bill, brought new evidence to the law suit. In fact, its now the law. SCOTUS says its a tax bill. So, its a tax bill.
It is the opinion of TPATH as well as all of our researchers and contributors, immediately upon ruling Obamacare a tax bill, Roberts could have and probably should have, ruled it unconstitutional under the constraints of Article I, Section 7 of the Constitution.
Just a small review of the history of the Senate Healthcare bill which is the one being challenged. This bill was written and produced by the Senate and by use of reconciliation passed it on to Obama's desk. So not only was this bill not produced by the the House of Representatives as required by Article I, Section 7, but it was never voted on by the full House.
The bottom line is, the Healthcare Bill was deemed unconstitutional, in its entirety, the instant that Roberts declared it a tax bill. Taxes cannot be raised by the US Senate.
TPATH hopes you will take this into consideration. This fight to save America from this over reach of the Federal Government, is not over.
Regards,
Dwight Kehoe
www.tpath.org
**********
No comments:
Post a Comment