Sec. of Defense: UN and NATO, not Congress, provide "legal authority"

Subject: Sec. of Defense: UN and NATO, not Congress, provide "legal authority"

My good friend Scot is one hundred percent right. There is much ado today about yesterdays press conference whereby Leon Panetta and a U.S. General clearly put Congress in its place when claiming they need not consult them in matters of war. What wasn't discussed by either side is that Congress brought this about on themselves. They willingly neutered themselves long ago and continue to do so to this day but now are whining like two year olds when left out of the loop they wanted no responsibility to be in. Sort of brings to mind the age old admonition of our mothers, "you can't have your cake and eat it too". In the process of ducking responsibility, lining their pockets, securing their own wealth and futures above the interest of the American people and the entire country they have rendered themselves irrelevant.

This was not a military cout d' ta and it was not an attempt to make Congress look good to the people in an election year. This was a clear statement to Congress from the UN, you gave us the sand box and now you must play in the vacant lot, if you can find one. It was a clear statement that Congress gave away the seats of office in this country and they now own, rule and subjugate those who wanted an easy breezy life of luxury and largesse at the people's expense... paying the piper is a bitch!

We know that not all of our Joint Chiefs are honorable men. We were sure our AirForce is a black hand and much of the top brass of the Navy appears to be the spawn of Satan as well. Consider this a gift folks it exposes to the public at large just who the enemy is, who is responsible for them being in our midst and who MUST BE DEALT WITH.

The Sec. of defense is exactly right, they don't need Congress. they can do what they want based on the UN. Go back and look at a few key acts that congress took in the past:

Pan American treaty of 12-26-1933  (49STAT3097) Treaty Series 881 - convention on Rights & Duties of the States - Congress took State statues off and put the States under international law. State statutes don't hold standing in international law.

International Organization Immunities Act of 12-9-1945 - - Congress relinquished every public office over to the UN. Local governments up to the president fall under UN jurisdiction. Congress gave the UN the right to dictate what laws will be international & gave them the right t tax the States.

International Reorganization Rescind Act- Congress put this into form but they never took action to rescind the act. Fairly recently an Ohio judge filed suit claiming that Congress did not have the right to relinquish government authority over to the UN (a corporation or foreign country) and that the Congressional act was a constitutional violation because they didn't put it to the States or the people to agree on it. In 2005 the US Supreme court declined to hear the case therefore all public offices are under UN jurisdiction & they are not American Citizens.

Some other interesting points to ponder:

Oath of Office - Title 5 USC  331, 332, 333 backed up by Title 22 CFR Foreign Relations  92.12 - 92.31 and Title 8 USC, section 1481 - the public official relinquishes his national citizenship and are thus foreign agents as stipulated under Title 22 USC, chapter 11, section 611, loss of national citizenship  --  Public officials are no longer US Citizens, but rather are foreign agents and must register as such.


Criminal Prosecution - where is it provided IN LAW that the courts, States, etc have jurisdiction?
federal rules for civil Procedure, rules of Civil Procedure 7 Code of civil Procedure, and standard State Court Rules of civil Procedure - under RULE 2 it states that there is but on action that can be taken & that is civil.

Where, other than under title 50 USC, section 23 War & National Defense, is there any law giving jurisdiction to bring criminal actions? If you know of such, please share.
Under Title 50 USC section 23, they are using it o bring criminal charges and thus declaring us as an enemy of the state. If they are then they must prove when we Expatriated or were declared an enemy of the state because we were never told we were an enemy. also, they cannot just assume we expatriated.

review the 11th Amendment was an amendment to Article III, section 1, clause 1 ("The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority;--to all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls;--to all Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction;--to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party;--to Controversies between two or more States;--between a State and Citizens of another State;--between Citizens of different States;--between Citizens of the same State claiming Lands under Grants of different States, and between a State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizens or Subjects.") -  it stripped the courts of any judicial power. The 11th Amendment states "The Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State, or by Citizens or Subjects of any Foreign State.

Since it was ratified after the Judicial Act of 1787 which created all the inferior courts and the attorney generals office (see US Attorney's manual 3-2.110), it applies to the States. Georgia ratified the 11th Amendment on 11/29/1794 and ratification was completed on 2-7-1795.







In an awkward testimony before the Senate Armed Services Committee,
Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta insists that the UN and NATO can
provide the Administration with 'legal authority' for military
action without congressional approval.

In fact, it would seem that Congress isn't even necessary.

Once "legal permission" had been granted by NATO or "some kind of
UN Security Council resolution," Panetta maintained, the President
wouldn't need authorization from Congress.

Video:

http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/9770.html

Goodman Green
- Brasscheck

P.S. Please share Brasscheck TV e-mails and
videos with friends and colleagues.

That's how we grow. Thanks.

================================
Brasscheck TV
2380 California St.
San Francisco, CA 94115

To unsubscribe or change subscriber options visit:
http://www.aweber.com/z/r/?zAxs7OwctKwMDIycrBwstEa0jMzsDIxMrMw=

--
Teri

1892 – Bankers adopted their Bankers’ Manifesto of 1892 in which it was declared:  “We [the bankers] must proceed with caution and guard every move made, for the lower order of people are already showing signs of restless commotion. Prudence will therefore show a policy of apparently yielding to the popular will until our plans are so far consummated that we can declare our designs without fear of any organized resistance. The Farmers Alliance and Knights of Labor organizations in the United States should be carefully watched by our trusted men, and we must take immediate steps to control these organizations in our interest or disrupt them….
       The courts must be called to our aid, debts must be collected, bonds and mortgages foreclosed as rapidly as possible.
       When through the process of the law, the common people have lost their homes, they will be more tractable and easily governed through the influence of the strong arm of the government applied to a central power of imperial wealth under the control of the leading financiers. People without homes will not quarrel with their leaders.”

Rags make paper,
Paper makes money,
Money makes banks,
Banks make loans,
Loans make poverty,
Poverty makes rags.