The Window of Opportunity to Protect Vaccine Freedom Is Closing
There is a closing window of opportunity for you to make a difference in the cultural vaccine war that's imploding on us now, and we're going to tell you what you can do about it.
Dr. Mercola
Nov 8 2015
As noted by Barbara Loe Fisher, president and co-founder of the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC), starting in January of 2015, Americans were slammed with what can only be described as mass hysteria surrounding the measles outbreak in Disneyland.Patient zero has never been identified. To this day, public health officials still don't know who brought measles into Disneyland. Yet in no time at all, public health officials joined with pharmaceutical company and medical trade organization lobbyists and immediately started calling for elimination of all non-medical personal belief vaccine exemptions (for religious and conscientiously held beliefs).
Orchestrated Mass Hysteria and the March into Tyranny
At the beginning of 2015, 48 states allowed a religious vaccine exemption in addition to a medical exemption, and 17 states included a personal, conscientious, or philosophical belief exemption in vaccine laws that require children to get government recommended vaccinations to attend school.
As many of you know, the result of that hysterical demonization of anyone taking a personal belief vaccine exemption resulted in a huge Pharma-funded lobbying campaign in California to take away the personal belief exemption in that state, which encompassed both religious and conscientious beliefs, leaving only the very narrow medical exemption that must be granted by a medical doctor.
The Pharma-Medical Trade government lobbying campaign was successful, despite stronger than ever opposition to the proposed forced vaccination bill (SB277) from thousands of Californians who showed up in droves to object to the bill at a series of legislative public hearings and protest rallies.
California is now only one of three states in the US that will only allow a medical vaccine exemption written by a doctor, for which 99.99 percent of children do not qualify under strict federal guidelines.
Unless you can find a medical doctor to write your child a medical exemption, your child cannot go to day care or attend public or private schools in California without getting multiple doses of 9 or 10 state mandated vaccines (polio, diphtheria, pertussis, tetanus, haemophilus influenza B (for day care), hepatitis B, measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella zoster (chickenpox).
If you refuse even one federally recommended dose of those vaccines, you are forced to homeschool your child.
"I'm calling it segregation of children who do not have all of the state-mandated and recommended vaccines," Barbara says, "which is a violation of civil rights. It's a violation of civil rights not to allow children to get a school education.
It's very serious. One hundred vaccine-related bills were introduced in this country in January and February of 2015 as a result of this mass hysteria about measles' cases associated with Disneyland.In Texas, 20 bills were introduced. In 11 states, the personal belief exemption was attacked for removal.
At the end of the day though, because people stood up and fought back to try to preserve these personal belief exemptions, the state of California was the only one that eliminated the personal belief exemption.
In Vermont, the philosophical exemption was removed but the religious exemption was retained. Now, you have 47 states that have the religious exemption and medical [exemption].
About 16 states left have the philosophical or conscientious belief exemption."
2015: A Turning Point for the Worse
It seems quite obvious that the Disneyland debacle was a well-coordinated, orchestrated, and carefully-planned event aimed at implementing a strategy to compel vaccine use on everyone, without exceptions.
Not only has California removed the personal belief vaccine exemption for children attending daycare and schools, the legislature also passed a bill to prevent any adult child care worker from being employed in California unless they have received all state-mandated federally recommended vaccines.Adults and parents who want to volunteer in daycare and child care centers also will not be able to do so unless they're up-to-date on all of the state-mandated vaccines. Says Barbara:
"This year was really a turning point in the vaccine safety and informed consent movement in the 21st century.
This well-orchestrated move by the pharmaceutical, medical trade, and public health agency alliance to remove all non-medical exemptions, and to do it in such a sweeping way is something I think Americans need to wake up to.
Understand: our freedom is taken away incrementally in this country.
We have to be vigilant and we have to understand that once you walk down this road where you are punishing people if they don't conform with government policy, that's a very dangerous road to walk down. We have to take action to protect our freedom."
Vaccine Rate Tracking Opens the Door for Discrimination
After they successfully took away the personal belief vaccine exemption in California, federal health officials launched a new national vaccine tracking and school safety "rating" system on the CDC's website, and California launched a similar website at the state level that tracks and rates schools using colored stars based on vaccine uptake.
Using electronic medical records and vaccine tracking systems, California's website has an interactive map that publishes for each kindergarten and middle school the percentage of children who are in full compliance with state vaccine mandates and how many take personal belief exemptions.The information includes the names and addresses of the schools in the state; numbers of children enrolled; the personal belief exemption rate; the up-to-date vaccination rate; and the vaccine coverage rates in that school for each state mandated vaccine.
Government health officials then rate each school using a star system — a green star means 95 to 100 percent of the student body is fully vaccinated; a red star indicates less than 79.9 percent are vaccinated.
This is a violation of medical privacy, because let's say a school has less than 100 students, revealing the percentage rate could make it very easy for parents to figure out who might have a personal belief vaccine exemption, and they may then become targets for discrimination.
"I'm very concerned about this," Barbara says."I think it's outrageous. I wrote a commentary shortly after, saying that if health officials are determined to do this, then they should be very truthful with parents about the real health status' of children attending schools in this country.
Because the truth is, within the last 30 years, as the government has mandated more and more vaccines for children, we have seen a chronic disease and disability epidemic sweeping through American schools.
Why don't they also post the numbers of sick days that children have taken in private and public schools? Why not the percentage of children who are chronically ill, disabled, or on medication for things like asthma, diabetes, ADHD, bipolar disorder, and depression – two conditions that have sky rocketed among children in the last few decades?
Why don't they post the percentage of the children who have HIV, hepatitis B, syphilis, and tuberculosis (TB)? There are children attending our schools who have those transmittable, infectious diseases. Why don't we know about them?
Why don't they post the percentage of children who are in special education classes, who have autism and learning disabilities, and the percentage of children who are fully vaccinated or unvaccinated and get infectious diseases? This idea that rating schools in terms of safety that's connected with the vaccine coverage rate and the personal belief exemption rate, that's not the only way you characterize the health of a student population.
We have got to put the brakes and put boundaries on the interventions that these public health officials are suggesting. There is no more fundamental a human right than the freedom to decide what you're going to risk your life or your child's life for in terms of putting something into your body or the body of your child."
Militarization of Public Health Policy and Medical Fascism
Personally, I believe current government-enforced "no exceptions" vaccination policies can be called medical fascism, and it is easy to connect the dots between the revolving doors of government and industry.
If you study history, you will discover that the head of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) — the federal agency responsible for recommending these draconian "one-size-fits-all" forced vaccination policies — was headed up by Dr. Julie Gerberding between 2002 and 2009.
After spending eight years as the director of the CDC, she went on to become the president of the division of vaccines for Merck, a Pharma giant making billions of dollars marketing vaccines in the U.S. and globally.
She was an insider, and she knows how the CDC works. Now, she's the president of the drug company that is the sole producer of the measles vaccine in the MMR shot in the U.S., and we have this outbreak of measles at Disneyland in January 2015 that is immediately blown out of all proportion to support oppressive civil rights' violations to prop up a failing mass vaccination program.
Corporate intervention in government is part of the very definition of fascism, and that's precisely what the pharmaceutical industry is doing, through their aggressive lobbying and their revolving doors.
Revolving Doors Between Industry and Government Must Be Shut
The revolving door between the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), the CDC, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the National Institutes of Health (NIH), and the pharmaceutical industry should be prohibited by law.
Employees routinely leave these government agencies to go to work for drug companies, and sometimes they rotate back and forth more than once. As noted by Barbara:
"It's not allowed in any other industries. It's not allowed in the defense industry. There are at least a certain number of years you have to wait. But there's a long history of researchers, doctors, and scientists who are associated with the Department of Health and Human Services who are working for pharma and vice versa.
The other thing that I think people don't realize is the Congress, in the last 30 to 40 years, has given the green light to federal health agencies to create a formal financial public-private partnership with the pharmaceutical industry.
When you have a business partnership with someone, you are not going to have a lot of oversight on the safety of the products that your business partner is creating.
This is especially true if the agencies involved in making policy for how we use these vaccines also license them for safety and effectiveness, and use taxpayer dollars to pay advertising agencies and people within HHS to aggressively promote the widespread use of these vaccines.
Now, it's gone beyond promotion. It's going into taking out a hammer and clubbing people and saying, 'You may not function in society unless you have gotten all the government recommended and mandated vaccines.'
There's no other word for this but 'tyranny' because informed consent is a human right. The human right to informed consent to medical risk taking must be protected in this and every country."
Medical Overreach and Deceptive Advertising
The fall season is upon us, which means being subjected to the usual avalanche of flu vaccine advertisements that go along with it. You can get a flu shot virtually anywhere these days, at your pharmacy, in grocery stores, and in airports. They're also launching a new adult immunization plan targeting community services locations, such as places of worship and private businesses.
I recently experienced a new level of this aggressive, invasive flu shot marketing. I received both a phone call and a text from a medical clinic I had visited a few years ago for an insurance physical, telling me it's important that I get a flu shot, and where I could get one. I was outraged, and I called the medical director to give him a piece of my mind.
This is a dramatic example of how they're reaching into every area of our lives, insisting that getting an annual flu shot is necessary when, in fact, the exact opposite is the case. There's actually NO evidence that the flu vaccine even works. In many years, it has an exceptionally low effectiveness rate.
The three or four influenza strains contained in annual flu shots represent only a fraction of the 200 or so different viruses known to circulate and cause flu-like symptoms each year. In addition, only about 20 percent of suspected influenza cases that occur during the flu season test positive for type A or type B influenza.
If the influenza strains contained in the flu shot aren't a good match for the strains circulating in any given year, it's obviously not going to do you much good. For example, CBC News recently reported that, in British Columbia, Canada, this year's flu vaccine offers only 30 to 50 percent protection.
Last year's vaccine was a near total mismatch, offering virtually ZERO protection whatsoever against the viral strains in circulation! Yet, despite that documented fact, people were still told to get their flu shot!
No comments:
Post a Comment