For all the critics and ignoramuses who choose 

to bash the publishers about content posted, 

You need to read this!

Nesaranews Mission Statement

Question -- What is the goal of this website? Why do we share different
 sources of information that sometimes conflicts or might even be 
considered disinformation? 
Answer -- The primary goal of Nesaranews is to help all people become better 
truth-seekers in a real-time boots-on-the-ground fashion. This is for the purpose 
of learning to think critically, discovering the truth from within—not just 
believing things blindly because it came from an "authority" or credible source. 
 Instead of telling you what the truth is, we share information from many sources so that you 
can discern it for yourself. We focus on teaching you the tools to become your own authority 
on the truth, gaining self-mastery, sovereignty, and freedom in the process. We want each of 
you to become your own leaders and masters of personal discernment, and as such, all 
information should be vetted, analyzed and discerned at a personal level. We also 
encourage you to discuss your thoughts in the comments section of this site to engage in a 
group discernment process. Not to bash publishers!

"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought 
without accepting it." – Aristotle

Saturday, November 30, 2013

Privacy World's November 2013 Newsletter Issue 5Nov

Subject: Privacy World's November 2013 Newsletter Issue 5Nov

> N.S.A. Gathers Data on Social Connections of U.S. Citizens
> WASHINGTON --- Since 2010, the National Security Agency
> been exploiting its huge collections of data to create sophisticated
> graphs of some Americans' social connections that can identify their
> associates, their locations at certain times, their traveling
> companions and other personal information, according to newly
> disclosed documents and interviews with officials.
> The spy agency began allowing the analysis of phone call and e-mail
> logs in November 2010 to examine Americans' networks of associations
> for foreign intelligence purposes after N.S.A. officials lifted
> restrictions on the practice, according to documents provided by
> Edward J. Snowden, the former N.S.A. contractor.
> The policy shift was intended to help the agency "discover and track"
> connections between intelligence targets overseas and people in the
> United States, according to an N.S.A. memorandum from January 2011.
> The agency was authorized to conduct "large-scale graph analysis on
> very large sets of communications metadata without having to check
> foreignness" of every e-mail address, phone number or other
> identifier, the document said. Because of concerns about infringing on
> the privacy of American citizens, the computer analysis of such data
> had previously been permitted only for foreigners.
> The agency can augment the communications data with material from
> public, commercial and other sources, including bank codes, insurance
> information, Facebook profiles, passenger manifests, voter
> registration rolls and GPS location information, as well as property
> records and unspecified tax data, according to the documents. They do
> not indicate any restrictions on the use of such "enrichment" data,
> and several former senior Obama administration officials said the
> agency drew on it for both Americans and foreigners.
> N.S.A. officials declined to say how many Americans have been caught
> up in the effort, including people involved in no wrongdoing. The
> documents do not describe what has resulted from the scrutiny, which
> links phone numbers and e-mails in a "contact chain" tied directly or
> indirectly to a person or organization overseas that is of foreign
> intelligence interest.
> The new disclosures add to the growing body of knowledge in recent
> months about the N.S.A.'s access to and use of private information
> concerning Americans, prompting lawmakers in Washington to call for
> reining in the agency and President Obama to order an examination of
> its surveillance policies. Almost everything about the agency's
> operations is hidden, and the decision to revise the limits concerning
> Americans was made in secret, without review by the nation's
> intelligence court or any public debate. As far back as 2006, a
> Justice Department memo warned of the potential for the "misuse" of
> such information without adequate safeguards.
> An agency spokeswoman, asked about the analyses of Americans' data,
> said, "All data queries must include a foreign intelligence
> justification, period."
> "All of N.S.A.'s work has a foreign intelligence purpose," the
> spokeswoman added. "Our activities are centered on counterterrorism,
> counterproliferation and cybersecurity."
> The legal underpinning of the policy change, she said, was a 1979
> Supreme Court ruling that Americans could have no expectation of
> privacy about what numbers they had called. Based on that ruling, the
> Justice Department and the Pentagon decided that it was permissible to
> create contact chains using Americans' "metadata," which includes the
> timing, location and other details of calls and e-mails, but not their
> content. The agency is not required to seek warrants for the analyses
> from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court.
> N.S.A. officials declined to identify which phone and e-mail databases
> are used to create the social network diagrams, and the documents
> provided by Mr. Snowden do not specify them. The agency did say that
> the large database of Americans' domestic phone call records, which
> was revealed by Mr. Snowden in June and caused bipartisan alarm in
> Washington, was excluded. (N.S.A. officials have previously
> acknowledged that the agency has done limited analysis in that
> database, collected under provisions of thePatriot Act
> <,
> exclusively for people who might be linked to terrorism suspects.)
> But the agency has multiple collection programs and databases, the
> former officials said, adding that the social networking analyses
> relied on both domestic and international metadata. They spoke only on
> the condition of anonymity because the information was classified.
> The concerns in the United States since Mr. Snowden's revelations have
> largely focused on the scope of the agency's collection of the private
> data of Americans and the potential for abuse. But the new documents
> provide a rare window into what the N.S.A. actually does with the
> information it gathers.
> A series of agency PowerPoint presentations and memos describe how the
> N.S.A. has been able to develop software and other tools --- one
> document cited a new generation of programs that "revolutionize" data
> collection and analysis --- to unlock as many secrets about
> individuals as possible.
> The spy agency, led by Gen. Keith B. Alexander, an unabashed advocate
> for more weapons in the hunt for information about the nation's
> adversaries, clearly views its collections of metadata as one of its
> most powerful resources. N.S.A. analysts can exploit that information
> to develop a portrait of an individual, one that is perhaps more
> complete and predictive of behavior than could be obtained by
> listening to phone conversations or reading e-mails, experts say.
> Phone and e-mail logs, for example, allow analysts to identify
> people's friends and associates, detect where they were at a certain
> time, acquire clues to religious or political affiliations, and pick
> up sensitive information like regular calls to a psychiatrist's
> office, late-night messages to an extramarital partner or exchanges
> with a fellow plotter.
> "Metadata can be very revealing," said Orin S. Kerr, a law professor
> at George Washington University. "Knowing things like the number
> someone just dialed or the location of the person's cellphone is going
> to allow them to assemble a picture of what someone is up to. It's the
> digital equivalent of tailing a suspect."
> The N.S.A. had been pushing for more than a decade to obtain the rule
> change allowing the analysis of Americans' phone and e-mail data.
> Intelligence officials had been frustrated that they had to stop when
> a contact chain hit a telephone number or e-mail address believed to
> be used by an American, even though it might yield valuable
> intelligence primarily concerning a foreigner who was overseas,
> according to documents previously disclosed by Mr. Snowden. N.S.A.
> officials also wanted to employ the agency's advanced computer
> analysis tools to sift through its huge databases with much greater
> efficiency.
> The agency had asked for the new power as early as 1999, the documents
> show, but had been initially rebuffed because it was not permitted
> under rules of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court that were
> intended to protect the privacy of Americans.
> A 2009 draft of an N.S.A. inspector general's report suggests that
> contact chaining and analysis may have been done on Americans'
> communications data under the Bush administration's program of
> wiretapping without warrants, which began after the Sept. 11 attacks
> to detect terrorist activities and skirted the existing laws governing
> electronic surveillance.
> In 2006, months after the wiretapping program was disclosed by The New
> York Times
> <,
> the N.S.A.'s acting general counsel wrote a letter to a senior Justice
> Department official, which was also leaked by Mr. Snowden, formally
> asking for permission to perform the analysis on American phone and
> e-mail data. A Justice Department memo to the attorney general noted
> that the "misuse" of such information "could raise serious concerns,"
> and said the N.S.A. promised to impose safeguards, including regular
> audits, on the metadata program. In 2008, the Bush administration gave
> its approval.
> A new policy that year, detailed in "Defense Supplemental Procedures
> Governing Communications Metadata Analysis," authorized by Defense
> Secretary Robert M. Gates and Attorney General Michael B. Mukasey,
> said that since the Supreme Court had ruled that metadata was not
> constitutionally protected, N.S.A. analysts could use such information
> "without regard to the nationality or location of the communicants,"
> according to an internal N.S.A. description of the policy.
> After that decision, which was previously reported by The Guardian,
> the N.S.A. performed the social network graphing in a pilot project
> for 1 ½ years "to great benefit," according to the 2011 memo. It was
> put in place in November 2010 in "Sigint Management Directive 424"
> (sigint refers to signals intelligence).
> In the 2011 memo explaining the shift, N.S.A. analysts were told that
> they could trace the contacts of Americans as long as they cited a
> foreign intelligence justification. That could include anything from
> ties to terrorism, weapons proliferation or international drug
> smuggling to spying on conversations of foreign politicians, business
> figures or activists.
> Analysts were warned to follow existing "minimization rules," which
> prohibit the N.S.A. from sharing with other agencies names and other
> details of Americans whose communications are collected, unless they
> are necessary to understand foreign intelligence reports or there is
> evidence of a crime. The agency is required to obtain a warrant from
> the intelligence court to target a "U.S. person" --- a citizen or
> legal resident --- for actual eavesdropping.
> The N.S.A. documents show that one of the main tools used for chaining
> phone numbers and e-mail addresses has the code name Mainway. It is a
> repository into which vast amounts of data flow daily from the
> agency's fiber-optic cables, corporate partners and foreign computer
> networks that have been hacked.
> The documents show that significant amounts of information from the
> United States go into Mainway. An internal N.S.A. bulletin, for
> example, noted that in 2011 Mainway was taking in 700 million phone
> records per day. In August 2011, it began receiving an additional 1.1
> billion cellphone records daily from an unnamed American service
> provider under Section 702 of the 2008 FISA Amendments Act, which
> allows for the collection of the data of Americans if at least one end
> of the communication is believed to be foreign.
> The overall volume of metadata collected by the N.S.A. is reflected in
> the agency's secret 2013 budget request to Congress. The budget
> document, disclosed by Mr. Snowden, shows that the agency is pouring
> money and manpower into creating a metadata repository capable of
> taking in 20 billion "record events" daily and making them available
> to N.S.A. analysts within 60 minutes.
> The spending includes support for the "Enterprise Knowledge System,"
> which has a $394 million multiyear budget and is designed to "rapidly
> discover and correlate complex relationships and patterns across
> diverse data sources on a massive scale," according to a 2008
> document. The data is automatically computed to speed queries and
> discover new targets for surveillance.
> A top-secret document titled "Better Person Centric Analysis"
> describes how the agency looks for 94 "entity types," including phone
> numbers, e-mail addresses and IP addresses. In addition, the N.S.A.
> correlates 164 "relationship types" to build social networks and what
> the agency calls "community of interest" profiles, using queries like
> "travelsWith, hasFather, sentForumMessage, employs."
> A 2009 PowerPoint presentation provided more examples of data sources
> available in the "enrichment" process, including location-based
> services like GPS and TomTom, online social networks, billing records
> and bank codes for transactions in the United States and overseas.
> At a Senate Intelligence Committee hearing on Thursday, General
> Alexander was asked if the agency ever collected or planned to collect
> bulk records about Americans' locations based on cellphone tower data.
> He replied that it was not doing so as part of the call log program
> authorized by the Patriot Act, but said a fuller response would be
> classified.
> If the N.S.A. does not immediately use the phone and e-mail logging
> data of an American, it can be stored for later use, at least under
> certain circumstances, according to several documents.
> One 2011 memo, for example, said that after a court ruling narrowed
> the scope of the agency's collection, the data in question was "being
> buffered for possible ingest" later. A year earlier, an internal
> briefing paper from the N.S.A. Office of Legal Counsel showed that the
> agency was allowed to collect and retain raw traffic, which includes
> both metadata and content, about "U.S. persons" for up to five years
> online and for an additional 10 years offline for "historical searches."
> The above article by James Risen
> Until next issue, stay cool and remain low profile!
> Privacy World
> A Note from your publisher: Sick and tired of your government
> tricking you? Then "Get Your Money Out of Your Country Before
> Your Country gets Your Money Out of You!" For less than the
> cost of a couple of soda's per day, you can obtain a totally
> anonymous bank account with an ATM card. Just e-mail for details
> and place "Anonymous" bank account in the
> subject heading!
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe,   send a blank message to
> To unsubscribe, send a blank message to
> To change your email address, send a message to
>    with your old address in the Subject: line
> To contact the list owner, send your message to
> Privacy World, 502 Hotta-kata, 3-6-10 Hirusaido, Kagurazaka, Shinjyuku-ku,
> Tokyo Japan


No comments:

Post a Comment