Saturday, November 30, 2013

REPLY FROM A COMMON MAN

John,

The following is a reply from a common man to the article entitled
"An Attorney Declares That The RV NDA is Not a Threat!"

First and foremost John I respect your right and privilege to display
in and on your site any and all articles regardless from Whom or
from Where they were Obtained.  It is on this basis that I wish to
present to you, and hopefully to your blog readers, some basic
FACTS which may NOT be as widely known compared to current
subjects like the RV and a reported requirement to sign a NDA or
NON Disclosure Agreement.

The titled article appears to focus primarily on rebuttal to one issued
by Judge Dale that was widespread and went Global. What we do know
is that Judge Dale had at least ONE highly respected worldly contact in
that of Dr. Michael Van de Meer, field secretary and spokeperson of the
BRICS nations.

By contrast what do we know about this self proclaimed  California
Attorney of 39 years of whom authored the titled article above? Not all
that much per se.  Perhaps these following Facts will help you and or
readers decide.

Any Attorney that "practices law" MUST BE a member of the BAR.
The BAR is an acronym for British Accreditation Registery to which
each member Swears to By OATH.  It is by this Oath that ALL Attorney's
pledge their allegiance to the Monarch of England!! 

Further this Oath removes attorneys and lawyers from being uNited
State Citizens.  They ARE Foreigners !!!  As such they operated under a
cloud of Fraud when representing any US Sovereign.  IN or OUT of Court!

Debra Siddons on Friday, 27 May 2011 reported the dramatic English
Jury Verdict in favor of John Anthony Hill that was issued on the 12th.
John Anthony Hill is the Producer of the documentary film "7/7 Ripple Effect". For more
details about this extraordinary case and the trial itself, please visit the following links:-

http://mtrial.org
http://jamesfetzer.blogspot.com
http://terroronthetube.co.uk/2011/05/12/muaddib-acquitted/

Two precedents were established in this case, from a challenge both the jurisdiction and
the sovereignty of Elizabeth Battenberg/Mountbatten,  based on two distinct points.
First she knowingly, and with malice aforethought, was coronated on a fake stone in 1953
and thus has never been lawfully crowned. In actual fact the Coronation is a binding oath
and a contract, requiring the monarch's signature. Which brings us to the second point.

At that Coronation ceremony, Elizabeth signed a binding contract, before God, that she
would maintain The Laws of God. This she solemnly swore to do, her hand placed on the
Sovereign's Bible, before kissing The Bible and signing the contract..
Please note that in The Law of God, found in the first five books of The Bible, man-made
legislation is strictly prohibited. To date, she has broken her oath thousands of times, which
is iron-clad, undeniable FACT. She is not the monarch, but instead is a criminal guilty of
high treason among her other numerous crimes.
We happen to have a similar situation here in this country.  We do have a
president / CEO of a Corporation known as The United States of America.
NOT of the uNited States.  The FRAUD American People have to deal with
is NOT being aware of the difference. 

People are flesh and blood living beings of our Source, Creator, God!  We
ARE Sovereign beings and NOT Corporate enities.  Our False Government
wants us all to believe that we ARE corporations and thus, have control over
us.  Thus Sovereigns NEED to be educated to these real world Facts.  ALL
Corporation(s) Law(s) APPLY only to Employees of that Corporation.  Not
to You or Me unless we work for that specific corporation.

This explains WHY our so called Court System is Corrupt as well as their
laws which are Statues.  For them to have any juridiction over us, we must
CONSENT.  They obtain this consent thru ignorance and trickery and have
been all to successful these past many, many years.  WE as Sovereign beings
must ALWAYS remember to counter their actions and USE these following
16 words Verbally OR placed upon "their Court" or any adverse documents.

                        I DO NOT ACCEPT THIS OFFER TO CONTRACT 
                                                            AND
                       I DO NOT CONSENT TO THESE PROCEEDINGS.


By way of summary, remember Attorneys are Foreign Agents and members of
the National Lawyers Guild Communist Party and the root of our political and
fascist foreign corporate federal and state governments.  A well established
Fact is that Attorneys / Lawyers do not like to do any research.  However they
are interested in acquiring funds or money and relieving you of same should
any occasion present itself. 

So since Lawyers / Attorneys don't do research or write responses for FREE
I have to wonder, WHO PAID this Attorney from California with 39 years of
alleged experience to write his rebuttal to the Judge Dale article and WHY ???

God Bless You One and All from a Common Man.


Jim

5 comments:

  1. Amen Jim. Thank you for sharing. The Alien Registration Act of 1940 Defined Officers and Employees Acting as Agents of Foreign Principal Defined Pursuant to 18 USC § 219 Also see; The Real Thirteenth Amendment

    Whereas defined pursuant to: The Alien Registration Act of 1940, usually called the Smith Act because the anti-sedition section was authored by Representative Howard W. Smith of Virginia, was adopted at 54 Statutes at Large 670-671 (1940). The Act has been amended several times and can now be found at 18 U.S. Code § 2385 (2000). § 2385. Advocating Overthrow of Government;

    Whoever knowingly or willfully advocates, abets, advises, or teaches the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying the government of the United States or the government of any State, Territory, District or Possession thereof, or the government of any political subdivision therein, by force or violence, or by the assassination of any officer of any such government; or Whoever, with intent to cause the overthrow or destruction of any such government, prints, publishes, edits, issues, circulates, sells, distributes, or publicly displays any written or printed matter advocating, advising, or teaching the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying any government in the United States by force or violence, or attempts to do so; or Whoever organizes or helps or attempts to organize any society, group, or assembly of persons who teach, advocate, or encourage the overthrow or destruction of any such government by force or violence; or becomes or is a member of, or affiliates with, any such society, group, or assembly of persons, knowing the purposes thereof-- Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both, and shall be ineligible for employment by the United States or any department or agency thereof, for the five years next following his conviction. If two or more persons conspire to commit any offense named in this section, each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both, and shall be ineligible for employment by the United States or any department or agency thereof, for the five years next following his conviction. As used in this section, the terms "organizes" and "organize", with respect to any society, group, or assembly of persons, include the recruiting of new members, the forming of new units, and the regrouping or expansion of existing clubs, classes, and other units of such society, group, or assembly of persons.

    Whereas defined pursuant to: Officers and employees acting as agents of foreign principal 18 USC § 219 (a) Whoever, being a public official, is or acts as an agent of a foreign principal required to register under the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938, as amended, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than two years, or both. (b) Nothing in this section shall apply to the employment of any agent of a foreign principal as a special Government employee in any case in which the head of the employing agency certifies that such employment is required in the national interest. A copy of any certification under this paragraph shall be forwarded by the head of such agency to the Attorney General who shall cause the same to be filed with the registration statement and other documents filed by such agent, and made available for public inspection in accordance with section 6 of the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938 (22 USCS § 616], as amended. (c) For the purpose of this section "public official" means Member of Congress, Delegate, or Resident Commissioner, either before or after he has qualified, or an officer or employee or person acting for or on behalf of the United States, or any department, agency, or branch of Government thereof, including the District of Columbia, in any official function, under or by authority of any such department, agency, or branch of Government.

    ReplyDelete
  2. To Jim: What you said here isn't anything short of a cop out to slander what this Bar Attorney said and take the sting out of it because he has sworn his allegiance to Britain is somehow supposed to downplay the truth he said about the NDA because your feelings got hurt. I've have yet to see anybody shoot down any of the points that was maid by this Attorney. Don't try to us his bar' status against him, go head to head with him and debate who makes more sense pertaining to what an NDA is supposed to be. Because if someone paid him to write that response obviously you get what you pay for right? Because I have a couple of friends in the gaming industry who had to sign an NDA because of the software being used to create the game. Here is why NDA's is used in the game industry:

    The non-disclosure agreement, as it relates to video game software, exists primarily for marketing purposes, and it's largely about keeping the details of a product under wraps until the fan fires are burning their brightest. This mock-secrecy wouldn't be so bad if, at the same time, game companies weren't bending over backwards to hype the products that they don't actually want you to know about. End Quote.

    So why is everyone treating this NDA like the boogeyman? When it is used in other industries to protect a product long enough so leaks won't get out and destroy the official unveiling of something and loose loads of money because of it, so they install an NDA to protect future profits.
    It's no different then a party being thrown for someone and to keep it a surprise everyone agrees to not say something right? But if you do tell the person who the party is being thrown for and the details of it, is it still a surprise party? I don't think so. That's where an NDA comes in, which last as long as the planning is taking to get it done and once the party is started the NDA is null and void which is why most of them don't come with any expiration date.

    ReplyDelete
  3. But the real reason why people are so up in arms about this (nda) is because naturally they want to let the world know they are wealthy because they asses got self esteem issues and want to be perceived a certain way and not looked at as the average Joe anymore. These will be the first people to go broke. Because once that spotlight is on them so many offers, investment ideas, charities, projects and brokers will come their way that the slick talk from these people will swindle there money everywhere but where they said it supposed to go. Basically making themselves targets. But to be real honest the NDA is not effective as it is portrayed to be anyway because if ou do break the NDA agreement and someone tries to take you to court because of it they have to prove what damage was done and did the suffer any quantifiable loss of money which would be very hard to do and likely won't succeed.

    So all in all it's pointless because you really can't stop someone from saying anything unless the NDA come with some major stipulations and consequences of breaking it scares the shit out of them enough to honor and follow it until it's safe to speak about what the NDA is supposed to cover and protect..

    ReplyDelete
  4. To boil this NDA issue down to it's essence, aren't we all spending a little too much time being distracted by the "supposed" existence of this
    NDA and what it means, when NO ONE to date has even seen a working (or draft) copy of it for us to dissect?

    Kinda getting the cart before the horse here don't you think?

    ReplyDelete
  5. aside from anything else, most of his rebuttle made no sense as he was rebutting things out of context and twisting JDs original statements to mean other than what he said before rebutting his invented nonsense.

    ReplyDelete