This is an Awareness Blog to consider the future of your world. Actions are being done now to restore our freedom. County, State, and National Assemblies are forming across our world nullifying the corrupt corporations. Watch and become AWARE! Participate and be a part of making history!
62 MILLION VIEWS PER MONTH
Exclusive public outlet for documentation and notices from The Original Jurisdiction Republic 1861 circa 2010.
JUST BEFORE HURRICANE
SANDY, OBAMA SIGNED EXECUTIVE ORDER MERGING HOMELAND SECURITY WITH PRIVATE
SECTOR TO CREATE VIRTUAL DICTATORSHIP
TRUTHERNOVEMBER 9, 2012
While
all eyes were on Hurricane Sandy in the days leading up to the storm’s breach
on the mainland of the Northeast, the White Housewas
busy devising new ways to enslave Americans under the guise of protecting national security. On October 26, 2012, Barack
Obama quietly signed an Executive Order (EO)
establishing the so-called Homeland Security Partnership Council,
a public-private partnership that basically merges the Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
with local governments and the private sector for the implied purpose of giving
the Executive Branch complete and limitless control over the American people.
One
of the most effective ways by which the federal government has been able to
spread its tendrils into every level of state, regional, and local governments
in years past has been to continually convince the people that terrorism lurks
around every corner, and that the federal government is needed to
provide safety. This, of course, is how blatantly
unconstitutional provisions like the Patriot
Act and the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA)
were able to get passed with relative ease — without these draconian expansions
of federal control over American affairs, the terrorists will win, we were all
told.
White House forming nationwide secret police
to monitor lives of Americans
This
is precisely the angle being taken with the new EO, except it goes even further
in conflating federal power structures with local governments and the private
sector. Based on the eery language contained in the EO, the federal government
appears ready to begin rapidly expanding its command and control operations at
the local level by establishing a vast network of homeland security ”partnerships”
throughout the country, which will be tasked with reporting back to the central
command center and feeding “intelligence”
information as requested by federal officials.
“We
must tap the ingenuity outside government through strategic partnerships
with the private sector, nongovernmental organizations, foundations, and
community-based organizations,” says the EO. It goes on to add that the merger
between the federal government and the private sector is necessary to
facilitate the government’s desire to better “address homeland security priorities,” which
includes things like “responding to natural disasters … (and) preventing
terrorism by utilizing diverse perspectives, skills, tools, and resources.”
An official Steering Committee will be established with
representatives from virtually every single three and four-letter federal
agency, and this committee will be guided by a separate council
on how to bestincorporate the federal government
and DHS into every nook and cranny of American society. Once established, this
council will maintain control over presumably all aspects of society by
overseeing a secret police force comprised of spies from schools, community
groups, churches, and various other local institutions.
“We
must institutionalize an all-of-Nation effort to address the evolving threats
to the United States,” adds the ominous EO, which was flown under the radar of
the mainstream media.
For weeks,
Americans, even others, have been going to the same stale, lying “pop culture”
news for assurances that the candidate they were taught to hate will, somehow,
slink into oblivion after Tuesday’s presidential election. At least in cowboy
movies, the bad guy gets shot. In American elections, they can return from the
dead like Nixon, rise from the ashes, reborn, rebranded, “new and improved.” For Romney, who is
expected to lose, the odds makers give him around one chance in three, he died
long ago. Romney has rebranded himself so many times that even American voters
began to notice, and that takes a lot. The election is decided
by the State of Ohio. One problem we have in Ohio, as this is where I live, is
a criminal state government. Ohio, with Florida, rigged two Bush (43)
elections. We even know who did it, Mike Connell, working for presidential
political advisor Karl Rove. Connell was caught, was being forced to testify
against Rove and sought police protection. He believed Rove, Bush
and Cheney were going to have him murdered. Then, a few days later,
his small plane crashed for no reason, there was no investigation, no questions
asked, he was dead. His family talked to the press once, then stopped. Chances are they got a
call or a package of some kind. This is the reality of
American politics. One of the greatest
powers over the American people has been their willingness to have their rights
taken away. Americans have given up their right to honest news, to decent wages
and honorable jobs and, increasingly, Americans are fooled into thinking
political parties are the same. There was a film, “The
Usual Suspects” with a famous line that I turn to from time to time:
“The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was
convincing people he didn’t exist.”
The answer is very
simple. When Americans do not vote, they get Republican presidents. This leads
to deregulation of financial industries, economic collapses, a lower standard
of living, polluted air and water, rampant corruption and total control of
government by the Israel lobby. Of those who spread the
message that both parties are the same, that each is equally bad, that message
generally comes from two directions. One is the “hasbara,” the
paid “helpers” of the Israel lobby, who spread a feeling of despair and loss of
faith, of hopelessness. Some are paid to suppress the vote, genuinely evil
people, Malthusians, who believe that the common people are “useless eaters” who
deserve death in wars, life in prison or daily slavery as long as they continue
to profitably serve their masters. In Israel, some radical
religious leaders speak of such people as the Goyim, those who live only so
long as they serve the needs of Jews. These are the followers
of the King Torah, the Likudists of Netanyahu, those who believe all but those
they choose, not even all Jews, but the elite are those intended to survive. Similarly, America has
its Evangelical Christians or Christian Zionists, a permanent underclass that
feels religious belief and fear of a vengeful god is all that will prevent them
from sexually abusing their own children or shooting down crowds of innocent
customers at shopping centers. Charlatans and hucksters,
half-educated bigots in ecclesiastic garb bilk them of their meager incomes
while lulling them into virtual insanity with bizarre stories of burning flesh
and human suffering. In America, religion is a
business, one that feeds off fear of death, feeds off hate and ignorance.
Religion is a product, one easy to sell, one carefully groomed to exploit the
weakness in man and make him the lesser for it. Religious people in
America are Republicans. They love war and torture, they wish for control, they
long to see suffering and punishment and the politicians they have managed to
elect have delivered. Suffering and death at
the hands of American leadership, the crusade to bring Christian civilization
to the world’s masses, delivered through Depleted Uranium, through drone
killings, through shiploads of cluster bombs delivered to Israel, this has
given America’s “believers” a world they can feel proud of. Sometimes I feel anger. I
think, instead of the idols, there should be photographs of the dead children
of Iraq and Afghanistan, of Pakistan and Palestine, of Syria and Yemen; these
should be the images that represent the efforts of so many. When Mitt Romney talked
of the 47% of Americans he would never be able to convince, he may well have
been right. This may well be the percent of Americans who are not potential
sociopaths, who cannot be convinced to hate and kill without reason, thus a
group that cannot be convinced to support a political movement meant to destroy
the world. But then, we are told all
are the same, Obama or Romney, the same? Then I stop and think, what if Obama
told the American people the truth, that Israel destroyed the World Trade
Center on 9/11 or that Osama bin Laden was never a terrorist and died in 2001. What if Obama
said that 5000 Americans died, fighting to destroy the lives of innocent and
decent people and that those who fought back did so to defend their families,
their communities and their nations. Americans now hear that
Israel may not be such a good friend. Few mention why. There is no “pop
culture” reporting of the murder of Palestinians or the apartheid life in
Israel. Instead, there are only
lies, always lies, endless lies. Thus, we damn Obama, we
Americans, because either he does not know the truth or is it something else?
He does not tell us the truth because we do not want the truth, not many of us
anyway. This is where the issue
of Ron Paul comes in. This was a candidate that, at one time anyway, called for
an investigation of 9/11, implying high-level wrongdoing, actual treason by the
American government against the American people. Paul spoke of the evils
of the Federal Reserve System, of the Israel Lobby, of the War on Terror and
the loss of freedoms, the torture, the kidnapping and suffering of so many
innocent victims that it brought. Paul spoke of war for profit and how evil it
is. Then, when it came time
for him to run for office, his voice changed, as with Obama, he believed
Americans did not want the truth, weren’t ready for it. Twice, a group of
Hitleresque sociopaths managed to steal their way into power, the two Bush (43)
regimes. They destroyed the world economy, killed untold numbers, built a way
of life no human was ever meant to take part in and did so, at times at least,
with vast support. Romney, clearly worse
than Bush, either Bush, a man caught changing his words more often than his
underwear may still be elected president. If he loses as we are
told to expect, still many millions will stand with him, stand for lies, for
deceit, for hate and bigotry. There is nothing the
least bit in common between Romney and Obama. There is nothing the
least bit in common between Democrats and Republicans. No sane person could ever
say that. However, so many do, so
many who have seen the difference and yet do not care. What is it they do not
care about? That answer is simple. So many, a very vocal group, do not
recognize the difference between right and wrong. They themselves are the
“fallen,” bitter and destructive, lacking hope and vision. Those who say America is
broken only have to study its history, even the poorly contrived versions
schools espouse. We are all meant to love
our own countries, people are like that. What has changed is that we are now
able to reach out, touch the world, find friends, see the common humanity and
care about the world as we once only cared about our family or village or
nation. For the past two
centuries, political systems have risen, have fallen, each with a promise to
make the lives of humanity richer. For endless centuries,
religions have tried the same, some with more success than others. There is evil. It is easy
to describe. Evil is when we stop,
when we quit caring, when things no longer matter, when we stop trying to fix
what is broken, when we choose to look away. Goodness is not peace and
plenty, goodness is caring and working to change things. Romney is obviously
insane, more than most can guess. All those bank accounts, all that money, all
those lies. Obama, this is another
problem. Is he weak or is it that he does not trust Americans? If he finds us
lacking, if he finds that we turn away from hard truths, is it our fault or
his? Sometimes I think
America’s president should be chosen, picked from a group of people who hate
the idea of it, see it and the empty promise of power as a prison. When we find such a
person, we will, just perhaps, regain some of what we have lost. http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/11/08/press-tv-romne-more-hitleresque-than-bush/
Remember the Israelis who were arrested by
New Jersey Police on 9/11/01 as the attacks occurred? They were arrested,
interrogated, held for 71 days and eventually all sent back to Israel under
suspicous circumstances. Many researchers have
documented this as evidence of
Israeli complicity in the attacks. But did you know that the Israelis later
sued numerous government employees for civil rights violations? This is not
widely known.
There is a lot of information which outlines the initial
stories of the “Dancing Israelis”, including WhatReallyHappened
and KillTown.
The website 911Myths,
while defending the establishment’s story, also has a lot of good information
on the case. LibertyFight.com disagrees
with 911Myths conclusions and analysis but credits them with providing links to
some information that many other sites do not have.
This article will give an update on the “Dancing Israeli”
situation, with new information which hasn’t been reported by anyone
previously, to our knowledge. What has not been reported at all, either in the
mainstream media or alternative media, is the conclusion of their civil case.
The Israelis federal civil rights lawsuit was tossed out of court!
The Rabbi had advertised a public lecture series entitled
“The History of Anti-Semitism” with a flier that asked “Why did some blame Jews
for 9/11?” and the man simply responded to her question via e-mail
correspondence. After that story broke, Dr. Kevin Barret invited Rabbi Lander,
his academic colleague, to engage in some “interfaith dialogue” on his radio
show regarding the matter, but she didn’t accept the offer for some reason.
Nevertheless, ZCF’s video features numerous mainstream
news reports of Israelis being arrested by police that day, including footage
of an interview with the New Jersey cop, Scott DeCarlo, who arrested the
dancing Israelis at gunpoint. We will recap a bit here regarding the “Dancing
Israelis”:
5 men in a van owned by URBAN MOVING SYSTEMS were spotted by New Jersey
residents following the 9/11 attacks dancing, laughing, posing for
pictures, smiling and exchanging high-fives. A woman named Maria called the
police. New Jersey police officer Scott DeCarlo told of how he had to arrest
them at gunpoint after they failed to comply with his orders. History
Commons has an excellent detailed account of events involving DeCarlo that
day with news links.
Ten years after the attacks, in September 2011,
AmericanFreePress later conducted an exclusive interview with DeCarlo, now a
Sergeant, who told AFP that this will be his first and last statement on the
matter: 9-11 Cop Breaks Silence
The actual police and FBI reports were declassified and
released in 2011, and can be read in their entirety through the following
links. (911Myths notes that they originally retrieved the 6 documents from
scribd.com.):
CBS reported “A truckload of explosives” and CNN reported
“a ton of explosives” in a van stopped “near the George Washington Bridge”,
with three men arrested and in custody. Later, CNN ran a press conference with
Mayor Rudolph Guliani and Police Commissioner Bernard Kerik in which Kerik
denied that any exposives were found. All three news videos can be seen at the
very bottom of this page.
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
December 13, 2001
“NEWARK- The State Division of Consumer Affairs (“Consumer Affairs”) is asking
all citizens who have goods stored at Urban Moving Systems’ Weehawken warehouse
to immediately contact Consumer Affairs, Attorney General John J. Farmer, Jr.,
and New Jersey Division of Consumer Affairs Director Mark S. Herr announced
today. The State on Wednesday obtained a court order giving inspectors from
Consumer Affairs access to the facility allowing consumers access to retrieve
their goods and belongings. The State, at the same time, filed a lawsuit in
Hudson County Superior Court against Urban Moving Systems and its owner
Dominick Suter alleging violations of both the State’s Consumer Fraud Act and
regulations set forth in the Public Movers and Warehousing Licensing Act.
According to the complaint, on or about September 14, 2001, Suter departed from
the United States and left no one acting as an agent for Urban.”
On September 15, 2001, ‘The Record’ of Bergen County, NJ), reported FIVE HIJACK
SUSPECTS HAD LINKS TO N.J.; ‘MATERIAL WITNESS IN CUSTODY IN N.Y.C.; THE
INVESTIGATION, which read, in part. “An employee of Urban Moving Systems, who
would not give his name, said the majority of his co-workers are Israelis and
were joking on the day of the attacks. “I was in tears,” the man said. “These
guys were joking and that bothered me. These guys were like, ‘Now America knows
what we go through.”
ABC’s TV News Program 20/20 did an episode on the matter June 21, 2002,: “Five
Israeli men arrested soon after 9/11 might have been working for Israeli
intelligence, but likely did not know beforehand about the attacks”.
They also ran a news story titled The
White Van. ABC’s 20/20 interviewed a former CIA chief for the segment:
“Vince Cannistraro is a former chief of operations for counter-terrorism with
the Central Intelligence Agency. Now he’s a consultant with ABC News. He says
many in the US intelligence community believe that some of the men arrested in
the white van were in the US working for Israeli intelligence. They speculate
that Urban Moving was being used by Israel as an intelligence front.”
I suggest reading the entire transcript
of the 20/20 segment because it is very interesting and gives a lot of
details. The five Israelis were eventually released after lengthy
interrogations: “Sources tell 20/20, after high-level negotiations between
Israeli and US government officials, a settlement was worked out.” ABC
interviewed two of the Israelis, brothers Paul and Sivan Kurzberg. Paul is
quoted as telling 20/20 “(Through translator) I went to work over there
because, I don’t know, the situation here is not the best.” Sivan Kurzberg said
“(Through translator) They took away two months of my life. During that time I
was supposed to be on a trip that I had planned when I started my military
service.”
20/20 transcript excerpt:
MILLER: (VO) This is Kurzberg’s younger brother, Sivan,
who was one of the three men on top of the van that morning. Although Paul and
Sivan would not talk with us about the incident, Sivan and two of the other
detainees did go on an Israeli talk show after their return. Oded Ellner denied
they were laughing or happy that today.
Mr. ODED ELLNER: (Through translator, from Israeli talk show) Nothing of the
kind, the fact of the matter is, we are coming from a country that experiences
terror daily. Our purpose was to document the event.”
The mens’ defense attorney Ram Horvitz, who was also
interviewed by 20/20, denied all wrongdoing and denied the men were Mossad
agents: “This story about the five boys being connected with Israeli
intelligence is the most stupid and ridiculous story that I ever heard, and it
is nonsense. I don’t know who invented this story.” Mark Regav, the spokesman
for the Israeli embassy in Washington, also spoke with 20/20 and denied any
Israeli intelligence connection to the five men, claiming “The story is simply
false.”
Channel 4 in the UK later produced a documentary called
“The 9/11 Conspiracies”. They interviewed Maria, the woman who initially called
the police on the men, and also interviewed three of the Israelis. While the
Israelis didn’t talk to 20/20 about the incident in June 2002, they did speak
about it in the UK documentary. It is an excellent must-see segment and can be
found towards the bottom of the page here.
In 2004, four of the Israelis, Paul Kurzberg, Silvan
Kurzberg, Israelis Yaron Shmuel, and Omer Gavriel Marmari filed a federal civil
rights lawsuit against Attorney General John Ashcroft and wardens of the
Federal Bureau of Prisons. The four were represented by New York attorney
Robert Joseph Tolchin and Israeli attorney Nitsana Darshan-Leitner. They
claimed that their detention was illegal and that their civil rights were violated,
suffering racial slurs, physical violence, religious discrimination, rough
interrogations, deprivation of sleep, and many other offenses. The lawsuit also
stated “As Israelis and as Jews, plaintiffs themselves are sworn enemies of
al-Qaida and Osama bin Laden.”
Regarding the “dancing Israelis”, 911Myths.com notes “One
curious footnote to this story appeared three years later, when four of the
Israelis filed a lawsuit against the Department of Justice. We’ve not yet
discovered what happened to the case, and the lack of information suggests it
never reached court. Still, bringing the case at all is hardly what you’d
expect if these really were Mossad agents somehow connected to 9/11. Surely
three years on they’d want to keep their heads down, not re-open the whole
affair?”
There are three archived news reports on the lawsuit from
September 2004. The first is an Kokhaviv Publications IMRA Newsletter titled
“Israelis detained on George Washington Bridge on 9/11 sue Department of
Justice” dated September 14, 2004. The 2nd is an archive of a Jerusalem Post
article titled Four Israelis sue Ashcroft dated September 14, 2004. The 3rd is
from the Jewish news weekly of Northern California, titled Four Israelis sue
Ashcroft, FBI director over 9/11 treatment dated Friday, September 17, 2004.
The Public can access Federal Court records by registering
with a system called PACER (Public Access to Court Electronic Records) at
pacer.gov. There is a fee for this service and a charge for each paid viewed.
Sometimes, litigants or others may choose to post legal documents from civil
cases for the public on other sources outside of the PACER system, on their own
sites or websites such as leagle.com.
LibertyFight regularly reviews various legal filings and writes about interesting
cases, such as the case involving the Oregon man who sued the police for
falsely arresting him after he flipped them off (he won), the woman who was
arrested for allegedly avoiding jury duty in Colorado, the lawyer from Los
Angeles who beat her red light camera ticket, or the U.S. Department of
Justice’s letter to the cops outlining the people’s right to film police.
In the case of the Israelis arrested on 9/11, some of the
documents have been made public on leagle.com. The case is KURZBERG v. ASHCROFT
619 F.3d 176 (2010). The document is from the United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit. The Docket No. of the case is 07-0542-cv. It was argued on
November 17, 2009 and decided on August 30, 2010.
To put it plainly, the case was dismissed not because of
any of the issues involved or merits of the case, but because the plaintiffs
failed to serve the defendants properly as per the rules of the Federal Court.
Because the plaintiffs sued Attorney General John Ashcroft along with many
others working for the government, as the appeals court put it, “the plaintiffs
were required to serve process on both the individual defendants and -because
the individual defendants were sued for acts or omissions occurring in
connection with their performance of their duties – the United States.”
Ashcroft early in the proceedings actually waived his
right to be personally served, but the plaintiffs had to officially serve the
U.S as well. As the court explained, “by its plain text, requires service both
upon the individual defendant and upon the United States officially; one will
not suffice for the other.” They actually gave the plaintiffs numerous chances
to accomplish this, which was literally as simple as going down to any post
office and mailing a certified letter! As the court further explained in their
ruling,
“In order to serve process on the United States, the
plaintiffs were required to deliver a copy of the complaint to the United
States attorney for the district in which the action was brought and also send
a copy of the summons and complaint by registered or certified mail to the
Attorney General. Here, the plaintiffs failed to comply with Rule 4(i) because
they did not effect service on the United States. The plaintiffs failed to do
so despite receiving repeated reminders from the defendants that left the
plaintiffs with sufficient time to complete service.”
The court also noted:
“The time period for completion of service extended under
Rule 4(m) elapsed without the plaintiffs serving process on the United States
through service on the Attorney General by registered or certified mail. They did, however, attempt to serve the United
States three days before the time period expired by sending a copy of the
summons and complaint by first-class mail to the mailing address for the
Attorney General at the Department of Justice; the attempt was insufficient
because it did not make use of registered or certified mail.
After the time period granted by the court had expired,
several of the defendants, including Ashcroft, moved in the district court to
dismiss the action on grounds of improper service of process, including failure
to serve the United States through service on the Attorney General by
registered or certified mail. The district court (John Gleeson, Judge) dismissed
the case with respect to all of the defendants, including those who had not
raised an improper service defense by pleading or motion. See Kurzberg v.
Ashcroft, No. 04 Civ. 3950, 2006 WL 2738991, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68680
(E.D.N.Y. Sept. 25, 2006)…
…CONCLUSION
“Serving process on the United States through service by registered or
certified mail on the Attorney General might seem, from a practical standpoint,
to be nothing more than a formality inasmuch as the Attorney General, who is
charged with determining whether the United States will provide representation
to individual defendants, was himself an individual defendant in this lawsuit.
That does not, however, excuse noncompliance with the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure. The district court did not
err in so holding. For the foregoing reasons, we affirm the judgment of the
district court.”
This seems like an unbelievable and absurd thing to happen
when there are at least two professional lawyers handling the case for the
plaintiffs. It might be understandable if a person was trying to wade through
the courts and represent themself. Federal court rules can be very complicated
and burdensome to the average person not versed in the legal system. Many
times, cases are thrown out even when plaintiffs do have attorneys, such as in
the case of when Jesse Ventura tried to sue the TSA or the ridiculous case of
when Ron Paul tried to sue a youtube user (that case was rightly tossed out).
Many times, the court will dismiss a case based on what
seems like a “technicality”, such as “standing”, “jurisdiction” “Venue”,
failing to respond on time, etc. Fred Rodell, Law Professor at Yale University,
wrote a classic essay in 1939 on the fraud and pig-latin type jibberish used by
lawyers and judges. It’s titled WOE
UNTO YOU, LAWYERS! and is an excellent, must-read treatise. (The phrase is
from Luke 11:46:“But he
said: Woe to you lawyers also, because you load men with burdens which they
cannot bear and you yourselves touch not the packs with one of your fingers.”)
But for a team of international lawyers in a high profile
case, to let the case be tossed out literally because they failed to serve the
U.S. Attorney general properly? According to press
reports at the time the case was first filed in 2004, the plaintiffs’ lawyer
Nitsana Darshan-Leitner said:
“The infamous arrest of these young Israelis on 9/11 has
been used by anti-Semites worldwide as ‘proof’ of Israel’s involvement in the
World Trade Center attack. Our clients are seeking compensation for the harm
they suffered in the MDC by prison officials. In addition, the law suit will
serve as an important public forum to debunk the lie that Israel or the Mossad
was behind the 9/11 terrorist attacks. It will show that there was no Jewish
conspiracy as the Arab world continues to claim and put an end to this racist
blood libel.”
If it were so important to have a public hearing and “debunk the lie that
Israel or the Mossad was behind the 9/11 terrorist attacks”, why would the
lawyers allow the lawsuit get tossed out for such an absurd and avoidable
reason?! In 2004 when the suit was filed, many people across the U.S. and the
world were researching and finding out the truth about 9/11. Could it be that
the lawsuit was filed at a time to deflect attention away from Israeli
complicity and paint them instead as the abused victims?
It was tossed out for not sending a certified letter. Do you know how simple it
is to send a certified letter, with a return reciept? You can do it at any U.S.
Post office for usually less than $5 bucks. Strange days indeed.
At the bottom of this page in the green section are some relevent excerpts from
the Appeals Court’s 2010 ruling.
Martin Hill is a Catholic paleoconservative and civil
rights advocate. His work has been featured on LewRockwell.com,
WhatReallyHappened, Economic Policy Journal, Strike The Root, ZionCrimeFactory,
FreedomsPhoenix, Rense, Infowars, PrisonPlanet, National Motorists Association,
WorldNetDaily, The Orange County Register, KNBC4 Los Angeles, Los Angeles
Catholic Lay Mission Newspaper, KFI 640, The Press Enterprise, Antiwar.com,
IamtheWitness.com, BlackBoxVoting, and many others. Archives can be found at LibertyFight.com
Wei Wu Wei, the
legendary Zen Master profoundly noted: “When you give a
shilling to a beggar do you realize that you are giving it to yourself? When you help a lame
dog over a stile do you realize that you yourself are being helped? When you kick a man
when he is down do you realize that you are kicking yourself? Give him another kick
– if you deserve it!” So what’s that got to do
with Henry Waxman’s legacy? Well, if you voted for
Mr. Waxman to a 20th consecutive term in Congress, then you teamed
up with Henry to continue kicking our downtrodden and downhearted homeless
Veterans. Congratulations!
Keep kicking the neediest of our Veterans because you deserve it. Members of the Old
Veterans Guard worked hard toward defeating Mr. Waxman at the ballot box so we
could rid him from furthering his abuse and neglect toward our homeless
Veterans, but 54% voted against homeless Veterans while 46% voted in their
favor. Thus, Mr. Waxman will
continue with his secretive, backroom wheeling-and-dealing as he uses Veterans
property to reward special favors for his voters and cronies. Fellow Veterans now look
forward to initiating serious Congressional and FBI Investigations into what is
clearly the biggest land fraud scandal in American history that produced some
of the most heinous crimes against humanity … against our disabled and
disadvantaged homeless Veterans. As chairman of the
Committee on Government Oversight and Reform, Henry Waxman investigated
allegations of abuse against terrorist detainees in Iraq, Afghanistan, and
Guantanamo Bay, but he never once investigated the actual abuse of disabled and
homeless Veterans in his own Congressional District. Amazingly, Mr. Waxman had
the temerity to state: “The reports
of detainee abuse are undermining one of our nation’s most valuable assets: our
reputation for respect for human rights.” Huh? This, coming from
the person who is solely responsible for some of the greatest abuse against
human and civil rights on American soil when he refused to provide humanitarian
relief and care for disabled and disadvantaged Veterans and forced them to live
homeless and hungry in unsafe and inhumane conditions. Mr. Waxman’s cronyism and
malicious conduct have been going on for nearly four decades since he took
office about the same time the Vietnam War ended in 1975. Congressman Waxman, who
is not a Veteran, likes to boast about fighting against the Vietnam War during
his college years. Meanwhile those who fought in the Vietnam War and came back
seriously disabled have been shamelessly abused and abandoned by the
Congressman. In sum, Mr. Waxman fought
against the Vietnam War and then failed to defend our disabled and homeless
Veterans who fought in that War. As a result, 47 percent
of today’s homeless Veterans are from the Vietnam War era with many in their
60’s, 70’s and 80’s, and in frail and declining health. Incredulously,
Henry has refused to stand up in their defense and continues to kick them while
they’re down. On the other hand, Henry
defended thug terrorists who purportedly were being abused as detainees at Abu
Ghraib and Camp Gitmo. Correspondingly, he irreverently investigated our men
and women in the military who were fighting the war against terrorism in our
behalf. Henry even subpoenaed the
Secretary of Defense during the terrorist wars but never once investigated a
Secretary of Veterans Affairs on behalf of disabled war Veterans. Mr. Waxman continuously
defended violent terrorist detainees who wanted to destroy America even as they
had shelter, beds, showers, meals, etc., but he never once defended our
military Veterans who protected America and became homeless and destitute from
their war injuries. In fact, during his 38
years in Congress, Mr. Waxman never once investigated the misuse of Veterans
property in his own District that led to Los Angeles becoming our nation’s
capital for homeless Veterans. Even worse, Henry never
appropriated $1 for a bed or a blanket for homeless Veterans in Los Angeles. That’s Henry Waxman’s
true legacy. So, why would anyone ever
vote for someone with this kind of callous and unpatriotic history unless they
get a kick out of kicking themselves while bankrupting their good Karma
account? Thanks to the 46% who
voted to help our homeless Veterans. You will get a kick out of
knowing this: You invested wisely in your good Karma account. God Bless America
and the Veterans Revolution! http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/11/09/zen-and-henry-waxmans-legacy/
This United States Marine Corps 237th Birthday Tribute is the Official GoDaddy.com 2012 Video to honor Marines from Bob Parsons the founder of GoDaddy and a former Marine. I’ll be making a donation to the Semper Fi Fund as I did last year and encourage you to as well or support my current Fund Raiser for theWounded Warrior Project. If you’d like to you can also watch the Official 237th Birthday Message from The Commandant and Sgt. Maj. of the Marine Corps.
Hello All: This
from rumor mill news. Clinton, Geithner, Carney, and Holder are
leaving Obama's Cabinet And are being replaced by more trust worthy People. God
Bless Love to all
Wonder why these folks are all
jumping ship so soon after just witnessing the glorious 'victory' of Dear
Leader?
--------------
(snip)
Come January, the Obama
administration will begin again, and a number of people whose names and faces
have grown familiar the past four years will leave the public realm for other
livelihoods.
Secretary of State Hillary
Clinton, Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner and press secretary Jay Carney
are preparing for departure. Many also expect Attorney General Eric Holder to
be considering an exit.
The states have the right to
secede from the federal private corporation of THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
The whole 'government' thing is upside down and backwards. It is time for
the states to take back states rights, including returning to their individual
sovereign 'nation' status, and reduce the federal district of criminals known and
operating as THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CORPORATION out of Washington, DC to
what it is supposed to be - the servant of the people
and NOT the other way around as the cabal has forced it to be via their
unlawful seizure of power over the people and the individual sovereign states
by way of a 100 year contract extended to it by traitors of the American
government. I'm told that the 100 year contract is up and over and done with,
and it is time to take our nation back, returning it to the Republic as it was originally
founded - the united States of America. Hopefully many more of the
corporation states will also resign, bringing the cabal operation to its knees
and prosecuting those who have done deeds so harmful, murderous and traitorous
as to be beyond history's records of the past. It is time for hangings of
several hundred, if not thousands.
On Nov. 6, Americans voted to return
Barack Obama to the White House; then on Nov. 7, some folks in Louisiana
petitioned the White House to peaceably withdraw their state from the Union. Coincidence? According to the White House website, the
petition was created by Michael E. (full last name not provided) of Slidell,
La., the day after the election and has since been electronically signed by a
few hundred people, most – but not all – of whom hail from the Pelican State. “We petition the Obama administration to:
Peacefully grant the State of Louisiana to withdraw from the United States of
America and create its own NEW government,” the
petition reads. It continues, “As the Founding Fathers of
the United States of America made clear in the Declaration of Independence in
1776: ‘When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people
to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to
assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the
Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the
opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel
them to the separation.’” The petition concludes with a further
quote from the Declaration of Independence: “‘Governments are instituted among
Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, that whenever
any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of
the People to alter or abolish it, and institute new Government.’” The petition has until Dec. 7 of this year
to gather 25,000 signatures, at which time, the White House pledges, it will be
placed on a queue for response from the administration. Screen capture of White
House petition page for Louisiana secession
The White House created the “We the People” petition site
ostensibly as a way of giving all Americans “a way to engage their government
on the issues that matter to them.” “The right to petition your government is
guaranteed by the First Amendment of the United States Constitution,” the page
reads. “We the People provides a new way to petition the Obama Administration
to take action on a range of important issues facing our country. We created We
the People because we want to hear from you. If a petition gets enough support,
White House staff will review it, ensure it’s sent to the appropriate policy
experts, and issue an official response.” The page also explains, “You have just 30
days to get 25,000 signatures in order to get a response from the White House.” Once the White House does draft a
response, it has pledged to send it via email to everyone who has signed the
petition (registration on the site with a valid email address is required to sign
petitions).
Are you in doubt that the real original jurisdiction De Jure Republic is being restored? Do you have Questions that you want answered? Do you want to get involved? Visit https://national-assembly.net/ for more information and to participate. Check out the forums as the national assembly is 100% transparent to the public and welcomes public participation. This is the real deal folks. This is our last chance to do it right and nullify the 1871 contract that employed the U.S. Corporation to provide 19 governmental services to the people. This is our right under Article 1 of the Bill of rights. This also nullifies General Order 100 of 1863.
Search This Blog "if this search box is working"
Donation to assist in efforts to restore our republic
The DUKE - Patriot!
Born in 1948 Died in 2015
National Assembly of the people returning to self governance
Join the forums and introduce yourself so your state coordinator can connect with you.
Question -- What is the goal of this website? Why do we share different sources of information that sometimes conflicts or might even be considered disinformation?
Answer -- The primary goal of Nesaranews is to help all people become better truth-seekers in a real-time boots-on-the-ground fashion. This is for the purpose of learning to think critically, discovering the truth from within—not just believing things blindly because it came from an "authority" or credible source. Instead of telling you what the truth is, we share information from many sources so that you can discern it for yourself. We focus on teaching you the tools to become your own authority on the truth, gaining self-mastery, sovereignty, and freedom in the process. We want each of you to become your own leaders and masters of personal discernment, and as such, all information should be vetted, analyzed and discerned at a personal level. We also encourage you to discuss your thoughts in the comments section of this site to engage in a group discernment process.
"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it." – Aristotle
11
Followers
The articles on this blog are reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
US Supreme Court, in 1985, “Dowling v. United States”, unequivocally held that allegations of copyright infringement can be prosecuted only under copyright-specific legislation, not criminal law.
by
