Wednesday, May 31, 2017

Best road work sign

Video of a Veteran in need who may lose his home

This is the first time I am writing to you.
Please share the following link of a Veteran in need who may lose his home:

Jonathan Hursh:
He also speaks out on his Vlog about Truth in America at
Please also share this link for others to donate @
Thank you so much.

Clinton Documentary the Murder of Vince Foster

Pathway to Liberty: The Forefathers Monument

Key Information---Everyone Read This

By Anna Von Reitz

Lately, the alternative news world has been awash with talk about "Human Rights" and "Natural Law" and quite a number of people have been misled about this and are parroting it as the Next Great Thing.  In fact, it is old as the hills and nothing you want to be involved in, much less subjected to.  Let me explain.....and bear with me. 
Bankers and lawyers don't like the Ten Commandments, the Bible, or the Land Law that goes with it.  They may individually subscribe to Christianity, Judaism, or Islam --- all of which are supposed to function under the Law of Moses --- but for very practical reasons they want to waffle and weasel around the requirements of Land Law when it comes to business dealings.
Land Law doesn't allow binding contracts.  It respects the Law of Free Will.  It forbids usury and insurance.  And it is frustratingly local and subjective in nature.
That, in a nutshell, is what has driven the wholesale shift into Admiralty/Maritime Law.
The bankers and lawyers and their servants, the politicians, want binding contracts that can be insured and guaranteed, they want profit on whatever risk is left, they don't give a crap about free will and they want something that is "standardized" to work with as a form of law so that they don't have to cope with any irritating local laws or restrictions when it comes to administering the courts----and shoving all this down your throat.
And so, that is what has come to be in this country, despite the fact that virtually all the men responsible for this travesty know full-well that the American people are owed not only Land Law but the Law of the Land, and even though at least 90% of them confess belief in Christianity, Judaism, or Islam. 
It appears that our hypocrisy knows no end.
Land Law functions on covenants, like marriage, and good faith agreements---neither of which are contracts. 
Covenants are of a sacred nature, because they are entered into with God as a Witness and Party to the agreement.  It becomes a sacred matter as a result and no man may change or abrogate or interfere with it as a result.  Covenants are binding for that reason, but they are not contracts.
Good faith agreements are exactly as they say--- agreements made between men, either verbally or most often in writing, which may bear an appearance similar to contracts, but they are only subject to "good faith performance".
Jeremiah as in "Book of Jeremiah" is very instructive on this point in two respects. As the prophet laments, it is not given to man to know or control even one step.  We don't know and can't guarantee what happens to us or around us for the next ten minutes, much less the next thirty years, so it is apparent that we cannot reliably make contracts promising future repayments or performance of service, either. 
Jeremiah, the prophet, also does something peculiar that sheds more light on the topic.  He buys a plot of land that he has good cause to think that he will never be able to enjoy in his lifetime. This is instructive, too, because it highlights the "faith" part of "good faith agreements". 
Good faith agreements rely upon our will and good intent to carry through and do whatever it is we agree to do, perform whatever service we agree to perform, and to do so without fail to the extent that we are able.  It also implies our faith that God will allow us to carry through on our good intentions, subject to His Will.  That in turn implies that we can't make Good Faith Agreements to do things that are immoral or unlawful or just plain bad.
These "moral entanglements" are bad enough, but it is the "to the extent that we are able" portion of Good Faith Agreements that hangs up the bankers and lawyers to a point of apoplexy.  
They don't want to accept the limits of human abilities and the unknowns and variables of all our lives, even though they know full-well that these are the conditions we actually live under.  They most certainly don't want to rely on the honesty and good faith of their customers and neighbors and they don't want to admit that we all need the support of what our Forefathers called "Divine Providence" to make good on our agreements.  That makes things too uncertain.  Too variable.  Too....well, dependent on luck, faith, good weather, God, and other things that lawyers and bankers and politicians can't control.
Worst of all, in this shifting, changeable, stubbornly willful world of external realities, Land Law doesn't allow usury or insurance.
Usury is the profit made off of lending. Jews are forbidden from making profit from lending to another Jew, but not from lending to Christians, Buddhists, and so on. The same basic kinds of considerations extend in Sharia Law. You can cheat an infidel if you want to, but not another Muslim.  Actual, sincere, observing Christians can't practice usury at all against anyone.  We are not only called upon to lend freely and without profit to ourselves for doing so, but to give freely with no thought of return.
So that is why certain "Christian" kings during the Dark Ages and Middle Ages forced Jews into the banking business, to do the dirty-work of usury for them against their own Christian subjects.  Got that?  "Christian" kings can't profit from lending money to other Christians or anyone else, but Jews can lend the King's money to anyone but another Jew and profit from the transaction and divvy up the proceeds with the King. No problem.
The Jews didn't get into the banking business because they wanted to practice usury.  They got into the banking business because the so-called "Christian" Monarchs of feudal Europe wanted to profit from usury and needed agents to do their dirty work.  These Kings and Queens didn't want their only hands dirtied with usury --- though they wanted the profits--- and they didn't want to be besmirched with the gambling aspects of insurance schemes, but they wanted to be insured....
So all these people running around blaming Jewish and Muslim bankers for the situation need to look deeper and higher, and realize that it is their own "Christian" leaders and politicians who have failed them.  If the so-called Christian Monarchs and politicians were actually acting as Christians and according to the standards established by Jesus, none of these evils would exist. 
All Christian banks would function as non-profit institutions and Good Faith Agreements would be the only rule.  Insurance wouldn't even be necessary. 
When disaster struck, the worldwide Christian community would pull together to repair the damage and make good the losses for free.  And because there would be no usury allowed, only service fees, banks would be capitalized by governments and by donations from philanthropists who were willing to accept the risks of lending in good faith with no profit to themselves.
This change, in turn, would bring back morality and nobility to Mankind, and a sense of community and "joint venture" --- where each man and each woman would feel the desire to succeed, to hold their head up high and contribute to the best of their ability --- and when they were defeated in that effort by time or fate, would equally feel no shame about turning to everyone else and saying, "Please help me!  My daughter is sick.... I need a car so I can join a car pool to get to early frost wiped out my crops in the field.....a wildfire burned down my home....."
And as for the Jews and the Muslims? 
If Christians actually lived up to being Christians, the Jews and Muslims would quickly observe the health and love of the Christian community, the good service and kindness given to everyone---including Jews and Muslims-----and they would think: well, I can practice usury against people of other faiths, but there isn't much market for it and I don't feel good about it. It's dirty somehow.  Not worthy of my soul's highest calling.... I want to be free and big enough in my soul to lend without profit and give without taking back.....
Land Law is an attempt to bring these three great faith communities together under a common standard that all can use and thrive under.  Land Law is the only truly fair, truthful, and realistic form of Law that there is, other than the Law of Heaven.  Yet, for six generations, our governments have avoided and weaseled around using Land Law.
How have they done that?  By impersonation.
The corporations providing us with government services have arbitrarily given us a "PERSON" so that we can operate in commerce (business conducted between incorporated entities) as their very own franchises and share our profits with them as taxes and mortgages and licenses and fees in exchange for the "privilege" of being able to borrow money at interest, obtain insurance policies to cover our risks, and secure bankruptcy protection under their limited liability provisions.  Also in "exchange"--- though we are never told any of this --- we become subject to them and obligated to obey their every law and statute. 
Which points up the tip of the iceberg.
Maritime and Admiralty Law deals exclusively with unincorporated businesses known as "Persons" operating in international trade and with "PERSONS" which are incorporated businesses operating in international commerce.  There isn't a single provision anywhere in Maritime or Admiralty Law for any judge in that entire system to address a living man or woman.  That's why the perpetrators and proponents of Maritime and Admiralty Law have to distribute all these "Persons" and "PERSONS" named after us, and get us to accept them and assume that they are our responsibility.
They literally cannot address a living man or woman as a living man or woman, because living people don't exist in their court system.  That's why they get so testy when you show up claiming to be a living man or woman and talking about the "Constitution" which has nothing to do with them.  What they call ---when forced to do so--- "private natural persons" -- are not subject to their jurisdiction and, what really frosts their cake, neither are the assets of private, natural persons. 
The Territorial United States shanghaied the lawful Trade Names of Americans and arbitrarily redefined them all as Territorial Foreign Situs Trusts.  This happened under FDR in the single biggest act of treason, unlawful conversion, Breach of Trust, and brute criminality in human history. 
In a twinkling, with nobody's understanding or consent, the Trade Name of "John Henry Markham" a farmer from Purdy, Ohio, was magically redefined as a "vessel" in the Queen's Merchant Marine Service also, by coincidence of course, named "John Henry Markham" --- and what happened to the living man? 
He was also redefined as an unpaid volunteer Warrant Officer known as a "Withholding Agent" responsible for paying all the upkeep on "John Henry Markham" and collecting taxes from "John Henry Markham". 
Besides giving the rats a claim on all of the "John Henry Markham" assets, including his name, body, copyrights, home, and land, this action by FDR subjected "John Henry Markham" to the statutory law of the Territorial United States.
FDR had absolutely no authority to do any of this, granted or otherwise; apologists have tried to excuse him and the Democratic Party and the King of England by pleading "emergency powers"---- but in fact there are no provisions for the existence of any emergency powers then or now, and it just comes down to Breach of Trust, embezzlement, betrayal, and treason.
A few years later, the Territorial United States allowed the Municipal United States to similarly impersonate the living people and states of the union, to create "Municipal franchises" operating as "JOHN HENRY MARKHAM" and now, most recently, "JOHN H. MARKHAM".  These various incorporated entities can represent almost anything--- Cestui Que Vie trusts, construction trusts, cooperatives, LLC's, or Mr. Obama's favorite, public transmitting utilities. 
The important take home point is that these "NAMES" are all being used to impersonate you.  They are reducing you to a Territorial "Person" or a Municipal "PERSON" both of which are subject to foreign statutory law and which operate in international jurisdiction and neither of which are owed any protected status or constitutional guarantees at all.  These "persons" are all operated under the Law of the Sea, not the Law of the Land. 
Not being alive, these "persons" are not subject to the uncertainties of life. Known as "legal fictions" they only exist by a form of mutual consent akin to the suspension of belief required by Walt Disney animations. Also unlike you, these "persons" can enter into binding contracts, unilateral contracts, implied contracts, commercial contracts, maritime contracts, admiralty contracts galore--- which is what the lawyers like, because contracts generate controversies like cats generate kittens.  There is far more work and finagling available under Maritime and Admiralty Law and less risk of hanging, so attorneys love it.
Unlike you "artificial persons" can be guaranteed and insured and licensed and bonded--- which is what the bankers and risk managers like.  They can also be subjected to usury and taxation, which both the bankers and the politicians want. Such persons can be murdered, raped, robbed, defrauded, keel-hauled, kidnapped, press-ganged, and tortured without mercy----and all without accountability---and they routinely are subjected to such gross mistreatment.
Last but not least, the laws governing such "persons" can be standardized and made into a Uniform Code, so that the corporate tribunals responsible for administering such persons don't have to know any actual law at all.  The vermin responsible can hire executive managers, teach them their own statutory law and code, and live totally outside the Public Law in a virtual kingdom created of pirates, for pirates and by pirates.  This all enables a "judge" in their system to move from one state or county or even country to another, stealing homes and picking pockets as he goes, without the bother of learning a whole new system of local law.
Obviously, for many reasons having to do mainly with robbing you senseless and doing it safely and conveniently, criminally inclined interests have removed you from your native birthright political standing as an American owed the Law of the Land, and by force, fraud, and deceit they have entrapped you into "accepting" their gifts of "PERSONS" and have subjected you to their foreign Territorial and Municipal "law".
They use the process of impersonation to mischaracterize who and what you really are and also use it to hide behind themselves. Behind the mask of "personhood" the perpetrators can seek bankruptcy protection when they get caught poisoning the apple fritters for profit. 
No honest man having good intent and being in his right mind would ever freely choose to operate under the Law of the Sea and that's why our Forefathers stipulated that we and our states all function under Land Law, and specifically American Common Law. 
This is also why when employees of the foreign Territorial and Municipal governments "come ashore" they are required to observe what they call "The Law of the Land"---- that is, The Constitution, with respect to us and our property interests. 
It is far more convenient and far more profitable for them to "mistake" us as either Territorial "Persons" or Municipal "PERSONS" than it is for them to deal with their obligations owed to the living, breathing people.  So they put on their blinders every day and mount the Bench and act as criminals against us and they pretend that we agreed to this. 
We've been trusting and gullible enough to let them get away with all this impersonation Shinola--- especially since they have operated under Color of Law, and have pretended to be or to "represent" our lawful government--- and have, thus disguised, been able to impose and presume upon us and also to liberally engage in extortionate racketeering against our states and people.
So--- bringing it all full circle with regard to "Human Rights" and "Natural Law"....
Look up the legal definition of "human". 
There you will see that a "human" in legal terminology is not a man or a woman, but an animal or a "monster". 
So if you allow the vermin to call you a "human" you are admitting to being far less than a man, and owed only such consideration as the King in his Mercy might grant a farmyard animal and such law as the SPCA might lobby for. 
As for "Natural Law" that is another name for "Law of the Jungle" wherein the strong are allowed to mercilessly prey upon the weak and the only the tooth and the claw prevail and only the very fleet-footed escape. 
Gee, we object to being impersonated and treated as incorporated legal fiction entities, so now they offer us the status of animals and monsters as remedy?  We object to the despicable Law of the Sea, so now they offer us "Natural Law" instead?
I have a counter-offer for them: 
We are living people, men and women, and we are owed the American Common Law. 
Please take your Territorial and Municipal "law" along with your "human" rights and your "Natural Law" and shove all these up your butt, sideways, like an insurmountably large suppository. 

Thank you, very much.
See this article and over 600 others on Anna's website

BOYCOTT HEINEKEN: Heineken Promotes Open Borders

Conservatives Furious After Heineken Promotes Open Borders

Heineken has put some writing on the side of its bottle that’s turning the heads of some conservative consumers.
Heineken has written on their bottles, in no uncertain terms, an endorsement for open borders.
Because… Reasons?

*extremely late stage capitalism voice*
"Open borders, because a stranger is just a friend you haven't had a cold Heineken® with yet."

Spells, witchcraft and curses done on President Trump


President Donald Trump may have said a prayer for himself (PERHAPS ASKING FOR GOD'S WISDOM, GUIDANCE AND PROTECTION FOR HIMSELF AND HIS FAMILY AND ADMINISTRATION? OR PERHAPS FOR AMERICA AND HER PEOPLE? AND THIS IS 'WRONG'??) at the Western Wall, but he needs all of our prayers after what one author wrote in an op-ed published Tuesday by The Los Angeles Times newspaper.
Diane Wagman is an author who frequently writes op-eds for The Los Angeles Times newspaper.  In her latest, however, she brags about doing something particularly vile against President Donald Trump. The column's title: "I Put a Spell on You, Mr. President."
Wagman says she's not a Wiccan or a devil worshipper.  She just simply believes in the power of positive thinking.  And, she positively loathes the thought of our nation's president and the people he has working for him in the administration.
She wrote:
I cast a spell on the president.  I was not alone. Thousands of witches, believers and people like me all over the world performed "A Spell to Bind Donald Trump and All Those Who Abet Him" under the waning crescent moon last month.  It was not meant to physically hurt him, only to keep him from succeeding at his tasks.  Now he's complaining he's the object of a "witch hunt."  Maybe the spell is working ...
The binding-spell movement started with an article on Medium posted by Michael M. Hughes, a writer and magician. I don't believe in the devil, but I do believe our country has gone to hell, and I am willing to try anything to save us. (With evil people like Hughes and Wagman, is it any wonder?)
But before I lighted my candles, I researched binding spells. I didn't want to send bad vibes into the universe.  There is enough evil in Washington already: Stephen K. Bannon, Stephen Miller, Jeff Sessions. The dark and terrifying have risen.
Wagman said she researched the "pre-Christian" history of binding spells and then looked up the spell and the necessary ingredients to cast one of her own upon the president.  Among the instruments of her dark endeavor were a Tarot card, an "unflattering" photo of the president and an orange candle she took from her family's menorah (her husband is Jewish).
She wrote about what she did:
My husband was watching "Sports Center" in the other room.  I stood at the kitchen sink.  It took less than five minutes.  More time was required to get the components together, although that wasn't difficult — no eye of newt or boiling cauldron required.
She claims she was disappointed at first because the House of Representatives passed the American Health Care Act almost immediately after she cast the spell. But then she said "the president began to falter."  She suggested she will cast the spell again, noting that, "The next waning crescent moon will be May 23."  Wagman concluded:
I plan to complete the ritual again, but that's not all. I'll keep signing petitions, calling my representatives, sending donations to the American Civil Liberties Union and marching to City Hall.  A binding spell is fine, but it's not enough.
I believe in resistance and in the power of collective action.  Working together by the millions—sending out shared, fervent hopes and dreams and wishes, praying ?!!, voting, even casting a binding spell—we cannot be ignored.  Doing these things, keeping the faith, gives me hope.
The president remains under constant attack for doing exactly what he told the voters he would do—what we elected him to do.  Now, more than ever, he needs your prayers. --

BREAKING: President Trump has decided to withdraw from the Paris climate accord


One of Barack Obama’s most disastrous legacies as president was his decision to empower the Environmental Protection Agency to issue massive regulations aimed at destroying America’s energy industry.

Throughout his 8 years in office, Obama pushed climate change alarmism and did everything he could to push his environmental agenda, at the expense of American jobs.

Upon taking office in January, President Trump did his best to roll back many of the job-killing policies of the last administration, but it appears Obama’s climate legacy may finally be over.

The president is expected to withdraw from the controversial Paris climate agreement, a decision that opponents of the agreement have eagerly anticipated since Trump took office.

BREAKING: President Trump has decided to withdraw from the Paris climate accord 
 Photo published for Scoop: Trump is pulling U.S. out of Paris climate deal
Scoop:  Trump is pulling out of Paris climate deal
Details on how the withdrawal will be executed are being worked out   

From CNN:
The decision would be a significant foreign policy break with nearly every other nation on earth and a major reversal of the Obama administration’s efforts on climate change.
Trump met Tuesday with a key voice advocating for withdrawal, Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Scott Pruitt. He meets Wednesday with Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, who supported remaining in the deal.
The precise mechanism for withdrawal hasn’t yet been determined, but Trump has made clear he plans to fulfill his campaign promises to withdraw.
A formal announcement is expected at some point this week. The officials cautioned the plans could change until Trump makes his decision public.
The administration’s decision comes after months of internal debate and speculation about what Trump, who campaigned on leaving the deal, would do once he took office.
The White House was initially slated to make a final decision on the climate accord earlier this month, but delayed the decision until the G7 meeting in Sicily.
At the summit, German Chancellor Angela Merkel told reporters the climate debate was “controversial” and that the leaders of the other G7 nations — France, Japan, Canada, the United Kingdom and Italy — all urged Trump to remain a part of the 2015 agreement.
President Trump’s decision to withdraw from the Paris climate agreement fulfills a major campaign promise and will send a strong signal that this administration puts American workers ahead of far-left environmental policies.

Rather than have America’s economy be dictated by foreign politicians and bureaucrats, withdrawing from the Paris climate agreement shows what President Trump’s true priorities are: America first.

To the left, climate change alarmism is a religion, and anyone who dares question their dogma is attacked at every turn. President Trump refused to bow down to the radical environmental lobby and instead stood up for the American people! 

Video ALERT newly released based on our April 11th blog post

On Tuesday, April 11, 2017,  we posted the below article.

This morning we received a video put together by patriots, using the information provided in our April 11th post, who are also concerned about getting this warning out to the public. Please review the video, and please feel free to provide the video and a copy of the April 11th post to friends and family.  Feel free to provide this information to other alternative news websites. Working together, perhaps we can save some lives and even catch some murderers. The life you save may even be your own.  Thank you!

Original Post

URGENT! National Security and International Terrorism ALERT

Received from reader with request to provide this information to our readers. You may want to get involved and use this as a guide to send your own letters to the appropriate individuals for where you live, including Wash DC.  We are providing this information because we are personally aware of people who have been abused and victimized (murdered) by these weapons.  This report is providing TRUE FACTS.

Urgent National Security and International Terrorism Alert


Published on May 16, 2017



You can find the link to the original article here:


Music: Controlled Chaos by Kevin MacLeod (
Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 3.0

Obama's Vacation Comes to an Abrupt End

Barack and Michelle’s Vacation Comes to an Abrupt End 
After Receiving DEVASTATING News

Published on May 30, 2017

Barack and Michelle’s Vacation Comes to an Abrupt End After Receiving DEVASTATING News

Check The My New Channel :
Please Subscribe:
The Obamas traveled to Italy last week hoping to steal the spotlight away from President Trump, who was there for his first foreign trip since taking office. After their European trip that strategically coincided with President Trump and the First Lady, the Obamas returned to the States with some bad news.

Judicial Watch just announced that it obtained records from the Secret Service and the Air Force in response to Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests that show Obama family travel cost taxpayers a grand total of $99,714,527.82. Here’s what the new records show:
The March 2014 trip to Key Largo during Spring Break – where the First Family stayed at the exclusive Ocean Reef Club – cost the Secret Service $247,827.50: $182,120.33 for hotels and $65,707.17 in travel expenses. The total cost of that trip with previously released $885,683 in flight costs from the Air Force is $1,133,510.50.
Other documents show that Michelle Obama’s February 2015 Aspen vacation cost the Secret Service a total of $64,807.41: $47,109.28 for hotels, $3,559.43 in rental cars and $14,138.70 in other travel expenses. The total cost of the trip with $57,068.80 in flight costs from previously released Air Force records is $121,876.21.
Judicial Watch released documents from the Air Force concerning the 2016-2017 Obama family Christmas trip to Honolulu showing 17.9 hours flying at $142,380 per hour, bringing the total flight cost to $2,548,602.
Judicial Watch also revealed that it has filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Homeland Security for Secret Service records associated with President Obama’s movements, schedule and activities since his departure from the White House. This lawsuit is seeking:

All records of former President Barack Obama’s movements, schedule, activities, and/or meeting for January 21, 2017 through March 21, 2017. Such records include, but are not limited to, U.S. Secret Service schedules and activity reports.

SHARE this story if you think the Obamas should be LOCKED UP!

Leftist Libs FREAK - so what's new?!

Watch: Libs Freak When They See What Trump Had The Nerve to Do at Nation's Memorial Day Ceremony

           Stupid is as stupid does

In his role as commander in chief of the U.S. armed forces, President Donald Trump took part in the solemn Memorial Day ceremony at Arlington National Cemetery on Monday, and of course he was attacked for it by his critics on the left.

Trump laid the traditional wreath in front of the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier and delivered a heartfelt speech paying honor and respect to those who have made the ultimate sacrifice on behalf of the nation before visiting the graves of some of those who have fallen during the war on terror.

According to the Washington Examiner, Trump also seemed to sing along with part of the playing of “The Star-Spangled Banner” at the beginning of the ceremony, which apparently is now a crime to some leftists.

Standing beside Trump was his Defense Secretary James Mattis — looking stoic as always — and Marine Gen. Joe Dunford, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, who also appeared to be mouthing the words to the national anthem as it played.

Watch: President Trump sings along to "Star-Spangled Banner" at Memorial Day ceremony at Arlington Nat'l Cemetery 

Trump sings "Star-Spangled Banner" 
Nice to see a President who loves USA 
rather than apologizing

Of course, there are those on the left who will criticize Trump for pretty much anything and this occasion was no different as liberal media outlets and Trump-haters on Twitter let loose against the president for having the temerity to sing along with our nation’s anthem.

These sour pusses need to have something happen to them to justify their lousy stink'n attitudes. Someone needs to shove something in their mouths - or lower down on the acksides - to cause them some grief of their own.

Left-leaning feminist outlet Bustle wrote — apparently in all seriousness — that Trump’s singing along with the national anthem while at Arlington National Cemetery was “inappropriate” and unbecoming of a president. !!!

The Huffington Post described Trump’s singing as the action of a “toddler president” and remarked that he seemed too “jovial” for such a somber moment as honoring our nation’s war dead.

Can't the AHOs EVER find ANYTHING POSITIVE TO SAY ABOUT PRESIDENT TRUMP? They spew their worthless trivia all day long about the losers/traitors/ Obamas and others, but finally this nation has a President and First Lady who are presenting a positive image and accomplishing a cleanup of the swamp and the messes of prior 'administrations' to make the people proud - and all these jerks can do is nit pik and criticize.

But the venom really flowed on Twitter, according to Mediaite, as countless anti-Trump trolls posted expletive-laced rants against the president for daring to actually appear as though he loves the country and was enjoying himself, somber nature of the day’s event aside

Can you believe this? These 'trolls' who hate the country and who are doing all possible to cause riots, take the nation full bore into a martial law lock down, civil war, and more, and they think they can verbally destroy the God given leadership and example of the Trumps who are restoring this nation to its former greatness?!

Others suggested that Trump treated the playing of the anthem as if it were at a baseball game, or as if he heard it in his head as the “Happy Birthday” song, of course being all about him, since he is viewed by many on the left as a self-centered narcissist.

These complainers are sick. They should be deported to a muslim or European nation currently undergoing all the mayhem that this nation has yet to experience - for them to learn to respect and value this nation AND the Trumps.

Sadly, there are those on the left so consumed by their hatred of Trump — really just all Republicans in general — that they will attack him vociferously for everything he does, including singing along with “The Star-Spangled Banner.”

As an aside, consider that many of those criticizing Trump for supposedly being disrespectful during the playing of the anthem had no problems when then-San Francisco 49ers quarterback Colin Kaepernick and other major sports figures took a knee and otherwise acted disrespectfully during the playing of the anthem prior to games last year.

Isn't it amazing how their thought processes work? They don't know which way they are coming - or going. A big bunch of stupid, confused and double minded idiots.

Either “The Star-Spangled Banner” is just another song that can be ignored and disrespected, or it is an anthem worthy of honor and due respect. It can’t be both. 


Please share this on Facebook and Twitter so everyone can see the latest action by Trump that has liberals boiling over in faux outrage. 

Tuesday, May 30, 2017

Bank Update

By Anna Von Reitz

To understand what  American States and Nations Bank is, you have to understand the difference between commerce and trade.
Trade is business between unincorporated businesses and people.
Commerce is business between incorporated businesses.
Of course, unincorporated businesses can do business with incorporated businesses in the realm of international trade.
American state nationals naturally function on the land jurisdiction and participate in trade. They and their Mom and Pop businesses and even their larger more substantial private businesses all participate in trade.
When they step across the state (national) border they engage in international trade. Strange to tell, when someone from Georgia sells a car to someone in Florida, they are engaged in international trade. This is because each state is a nation.
When Porcupine and Sons, a local unincorporated family-owned sawmill in Three Pines, Georgia, sells a shipment of flat-sawn pine flooring to MacKenzie Restoration Design, Inc. located in Princeton, New Jersey, they are engaged in international trade.
Me selling ten raspberry bushes to my next door neighbor? That is intra-state trade.
Me selling the same ten raspberry bushes to someone in Oregon? That is international trade. (Why? Because each state is a nation.)
My small unincorporated family business, Gallery of the Lakes, sells a painting to an incorporated business in Idaho? (International trade again — Unincorporated + Incorporated = international trade.)
But, the moment that both parties incorporate their business, it becomes what?International commerce.
And what does the “United States Congress” have control of?
Ah! — interstate commerce, which because all states are nations, means what?International commerce.
So how does the “federal government” get its nose into absolutely every little petty trade and sale and transaction and demand a pound of flesh out of it?
Almost at the moment you were born, they swooped in and forced your Mother (without anything like full-disclosure)— to accept a “PERSON” for you, a federal corporation franchise named after you: JOHN MARK DOE or ELISE ANN KRAUTMEYER or YOUR NAME.
And from that moment on, you were “presumed” to be operating in “interstate (international) commerce” and held subject to the federal corporations and federated states issuing that PERSON.
All this to give you an update on The American States and Nations Bank— and all of it necessary for you to understand what The Bank is.
It is an unincorporated private Trade Bank engaged in intra-state and international trade transactions. Every one who has an account with ASAN has to be functioning as an unincorporated living man or woman or unincorporated business— not as a ‘PERSON’.
That’s what makes it private and ensures that we are always operating in Trade, not Commerce.
Because unincorporated men and women own themselves and unincorporated businesses owe no obligation to any government for granting them a franchise,our accounts are private, too.
What they call “personal accounts” at Wells Fargo? Remember that in Federalese the  word “person” means “corporation”.
Every penny you donate— literally donate—to the account of YOUR NAME ceases to be yours. It actually belongs to the federal corporation that issued your PERSON way back when. That’s why FDIC insures “YOUR” deposits. And that is why the IMF which bought all the PERSONS issued prior to 1980 can talk about seizing all the 401K and other savings accounts of these PERSONS.
All the accounts in all the so-called “commercial banks” belong to PERSONS and those PERSONS belong to government services corporations as franchises. When the parent corporation goes bankrupt— guess what? All the PERSONS are sent into Chapter 11 or Chapter 7, too.
Naturally, the bankruptcy trustees come in and seize control of all the PERSONAL assets in those savings accounts and safety deposit boxes, and the banks (that are actually behind all this crappola) stand there innocent as the flowers in May and say, “There’s nothing we can do about it. It’s a government mandate.”
They will wait until they can close their doors and wipe out the checking “demand accounts” too.
Let me repeat why. PERSONAL accounts don’t belong to you. They belong to a franchise corporation named after you.
In fact, the commercial banks are in deep collusion with the same foreign governmental services corporations that foisted their PERSONS off onto you.They set up this whole system with malice-aforethought to get their hands in your pockets, enforce taxes on you, and lay false claims of collateral obligation against your private assets.
They call this “hypothecation” of debt.
The IMF has been slavering after the retirement accounts of American pensioners for months, and has only been stopped because they are now identified as part of the problem and will be targeted if they attempt any such seizures of “PERSONAL” accounts.
Enough about the problem. Now the update on the solution.
The solution is to return to honest banking.
I know. Sounds like an oxymoron to me, too, but it can be done.
The American States and Nations Bank is NOT a commercial bank. It doesn’t serve PERSONS. It serves people. It functions in trade, not commerce. It is a sovereign state bank, not a “state of state” bank.
It makes no claim of owning your accounts or what is deposited in those accounts. It doesn’t loan your money out to anyone. Anything you deposit with American States and Nations Bank remains yours. Period. Nobody has any ability to waltz in and levy your accounts or steal your savings absent actual armed robbery.
Likewise, we don’t deal in commercial paper. We will be able to exchange different currencies for you like any bank, but we won’t be carrying any “Notes” as digits on our books. We deal in assets and asset-backed currencies: actual, lawful money.
Those of you who saw the Harry Potter movies will remember when Harry went to Gringot’s Bank to get some money out of the cache his parents left him. He had to pass muster under the stern and beady gaze of a small goblin perched high behind an old-fashioned bookkeeping desk like Bob Cratchett and Harry had to produce all the right information to access his vault.
Even though ASAN will have state of the art abilities, it will be an old-fashioned, simple, safe, repository bank. It will use carriage accounting, charge flat fees for services, and will keep all your private information private. If you get a loan, it will be an actual loan. All the rules of the bank will be fully disclosed to all depositors and they won’t fill ten volumes of microprint.
Those Americans in each state who want the services of such a bank will be able to organize an ASAN bank. These banks will all be national banks because each state is a nation and each will be totally under local control, however, by choosing our template and joining our banking association and committing to our service and transparency and organizational guidelines all the member banks will be similar in the ways that count.
See this article and over 600 others on Anna's website