What a thrill this must be to experience up close and for
real. Just the video is thrilling to watch.
Phil
|
Another view of mid-air re-fueling. Really beautiful.
|
Friday, November 16, 2012
Another view of mid-air re-fueling. Really beautiful
Ambassador Leo/Lee Emil Wanta re: WANTA-REAGAN-MITTERRAND PROTOCOL FUNDS.
Ambassador
Leo/Lee Emil Wanta re: WANTA-REAGAN-MITTERRAND PROTOCOL FUNDS.
People will not
recognize most of the email names… they are members of the Austrian
government. It appears to Marilyn that Ambassador Wanta is telling the
American government he has had enough of their game playing with his money and
that rather than accept the agreed upon $4.5 trillion by repatriating the funds
to the United States. He warned them in 2008 that if the Americans did
not want the $1.575 trillion in taxes he would pay on the $4.5 trillion that he
would reclaim ownership of the entire $27.5 trillion and work with the Austrian
government to retrieve the total amount of his funds from that country.
It should be made clear that Wanta never gave up ownership of the entire $27.5
trillion, he only agreed to accept $4.5 trillion in settlement… and then
Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson reneged on the deal and “kidnapped” the
funds. It appears the Ambassador’s statement to European leaders about
moving back to Austria where he has legal residency and working with the
governments of Europe, particularly Austria, to gain possession of what is
lawfully his may have stimulated the U.S. Supreme Court to take action on
Wanta’s behalf… that’s the way the Tom Heneghan’s Intelligence Briefing this
morning makes it appear, anyway. SEE ATTACHMENT.
http://theglobalnewsandviews.com/2012/11/02/ambassador-leolee-emil-wanta-re-wanta-reagan-mitterrand-protocol-funds/
Real Reason for Classified Documents
The Daily Bell
News & Analysis
Real Reason for
Classified Documents
Friday, November 16,
2012 – by Staff Report
Dominant Social Theme: This rash incident jeopardized US national security.
Free-Market Analysis: While it is a bit difficult to figure out exactly where Washington's latest scandal begins and ends, the seriousness of what is occurring has been exacerbated by accusations that one of the central figures had "classified material" on a home computer.
The necessity for "classified material" is one of the longest-running dominant social themes. There are, of course, many levels of classified material and a subdominant social theme would have to do with the importance of keeping government secrets out of the public sphere.
Reports of classified secrets merely reinforce the idea that much of what the US government does is highly sensitive and complex. One wrong move can jeopardize the lives of thousands or even millions. Here's more from the article:
FBI agents have found a substantial amount of classified information on Broadwell's personal computer since they searched her Charlotte, North Carolina, home with her consent on Monday.
Sources briefed on the investigation said the documents date from before August 2011, when Petraeus took up his post at the CIA and the two started their affair. None of the material comes from the CIA.
As an Army reserve officer involved in military intelligence, Broadwell had a security clearance that allowed her to handle sensitive documents. However, she would still have to comply with strict rules that lay out how sensitive materials must be protected.
Broadwell's security clearance has now been suspended. She could have it revoked and face harsher penalties if it is found she mishandled classified data.
Petraeus' remarks notwithstanding, investigators said on Thursday they had not ruled out the possibility that he passed on classified material to Broadwell. They spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss an ongoing law enforcement investigation.
Broadwell, who has not been charged with any wrongdoing, has made no public comment since the scandal erupted last week.
Of course, one wonders what this classified material was ... and whether it was really all that important. According to a July 2012 New York Times article, the US fedgov now spends about US$11 billion to "protect secrets."
Protecting important secrets has about doubled in price from a decade ago, according to the Times. And that total does NOT include the "costs incurred by the Central Intelligence Agency, the National Security Agency and other spy agencies, whose spending is — you guessed it — classified."
The real total, the Times estimates, was about US$13 billion and much of the cost was sunk into secure computers, software, coding, etc.
Classified information has become ever more controversial because of the Internet and groups like WikiLeaks that, according to the Times, have released hundreds of thousands of confidential United States government documents, including diplomatic cables.
Nonetheless, the Times article points out that, "Some independent experts say the ballooning classification system is the problem, sweeping huge quantities of unremarkable information in along with genuinely important secrets." More from the Times:
Steven Aftergood, who directs the Project on Government Secrecy for the Federation of American Scientists, said the classification of the amounts spent by the intelligence agencies on classification, for example, was unnecessary.
"To me it illustrates the most important problem — namely that we are classifying far too much information," he said. "The credibility of the classification system is collapsing under the weight of bogus secrets."
Costs are driven up in part by the slow pace of declassification, which has slowed drastically since a push in the 1990s. Many documents from the 1960s remain classified, and agencies still regularly go to court to defend their secrecy in the face of Freedom of Information Act lawsuits.
In May, a judge ruled that the C.I.A. could continue to withhold from the public one of five volumes of its official history of the Bay of Pigs operation, in which the agency trained Cuban exiles to invade Cuba in 1961 in a disastrous attempt to overthrow Fidel Castro.
The C.I.A. has also spent years fighting lawsuits seeking the release of files on agency officials who oversaw an anti-Castro group that clashed publicly with Lee Harvey Oswald, the assassin of President John F. Kennedy.
This latter legal battle is symptomatic of the larger issues swirling around state secrets. Like so much else in government, the chances are that there are a few REAL secrets and much else is manufactured for various reasons. Certainly, one's salary and status is enhanced by how much "classified information" one has access to.
And no doubt, as the Times points out, much information that is classified is pretty useless. But the governmental powers-that-be in the West do have reasons for classifying information. That's because Western governments evidently and obviously have been subverted by Money Power. The elite political, military and Intel facilities of the great Western powers are all engaged surreptitiously, from what we can tell, in building world government.
The citizens would no doubt be shocked if they could see the duplicity and double-dealing accompanying this manipulation. Every day the world's top politicos and their colleagues discuss wars, provocations, funding and false-flag events generally that are designed to stampede nation-states into the grip of a larger internationalism.
If there are any documents that those involved with these strategies seek to classify, it is ones that explain the evolution of this international plot in detail. This is actually – evidently and obviously – the reason for the expanded classification of "secret documents" throughout the Western world.
Ironically, such documents, electronic or not, ARE sensitive – and would be damaging to certain parties if disseminated. Not for reasons of national security, however, but just because the reality of internationalist efforts would be exposed.
Within this context it is obvious that a ballooning number of secret documents confuses this fundamental issue and generally obscures it. The more that is classified, the more obfuscated the real reason for classification becomes.
Conclusion: "They" don't want us to know what "they're" up to. But it's not for our own good but to keep their actions away from public scrutiny. In the era of what we call the Internet Reformation, such efforts are increasingly dubious, however. And actually that's good news, not bad ...
Dangerous Game: Rise & Fall of David Petraeus
Dangerous
Game: Rise & Fall of David Petraeus
“In electing to serve Obama, he
may have finally ventured too close to the flame”
"Associate
with men of good quality if you esteem your own reputation; for it is better to
be alone than in bad company."
George Washington
"Keep your
indiscretions a hundred miles from the flagpole" ~ military aphorism
On November 9th, David
H. Petraeus, the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), announced
his resignation subsequent to the disclosure that he had carried on a lengthy
extra-marital affair with author and U.S. Army Reserve officer Paula Broadwell.
Although Petraeus claims to have ended the affair in August 2012, it erupted
into a public scandal when incriminating e-mails were made public following an
investigation by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). Broadwell, who
mistook Petraeus family friend Jill Kelley as a romantic rival, had written a
series of threatening e-mails to Kelley, warning her to stay away from
Petraeus. Kelley forwarded the messages to the FBI.
While events are still
unfolding, as of 14 November, it has come to light that Broadwell was given
access to highly-sensitive classified information by Petraeus, and that some of
it was found in her possession. The curtain appears set to fall on one of
the most-celebrated military and public service careers of the last quarter
century.
David Petraeus is not
the first powerful and influential man to have an ill-advised affair, nor will
he be the last. This article will not concern itself with those matters within
the Petraeus family that should rightly remain private; however, because of
Petraeus' former position as Director of the Central Intelligence Agency (DCI)
- it is imperative that his actions be examined in the light of national
security. There is no way to sugarcoat it: Petraeus is guilty of extremely poor
judgment, perhaps even criminal negligence. To some, that verdict may seem
unduly harsh, but there are sound reasons for it.
Prior to
commissioning, all military officers are subject to a strict and very thorough
background investigation. Once on duty, an officer is subject to numerous
regulations and directives governing his behavior, access to classified
information, and when/how he may communicate about it. These measures become
progressively more draconian as an officer rises in rank and takes on
ever-more-sensitive duties and has access to high-level classified information.
There is nothing at present to suggest that Petraeus violated security
protocols during his long career as an army officer. However, when Petraeus
moved over to the CIA as Director, the stakes were raised considerably. The DCI
must be an individual of unimpeachable character and moral rectitude - and
Petraeus failed to meet that standard.
Even the
lowest-ranking intelligence officer must be alert to the possibly of being
compromised via a personal relationship, especially a romantic liaison. Upon being
approached in such a manner, that officer must ask himself if he is being
targeted by a foreign intelligence operative or other agent. The so-called
"honey trap" - using sexual allure to ensnare a targeted operative -
is one of the oldest and most-effective techniques known to espionage. Paranoia
is not normally a desirable quality in day-to-day relations between human
beings, but it is imperative in a high-level intelligence operative who wishes
to survive and thrive in a business where knowing who to trust can make the
difference between success and failure and sometimes life and death.
As the most-senior
member of the CIA, Petraeus should have been more suspicious of Broadwell's
interest.
It boggles the mind that he, a recently-retired four-star general and holder of
a Ph.D. in international relations, would be so blind to the vulnerability of
his position. The fact that Paula Broadwell was a fellow army officer should
have been immaterial; having such a background would be perfect cover for an
operative working to penetrate the CIA or compromise Petraeus himself. A higher
standard of behavior must be demanded of a man in his position. Sex does indeed
make men crazy, it appears.
Looking at the larger
picture, it is perhaps unsurprising that General Petraeus has come to such an
inglorious end. Despite his enviable record and accomplishments, he was guilty
of the elemental sin of hubris, and also of poor judgment in his choice of
colleagues. Colloquially speaking, if one lies down with dogs, one should
expect to get up with fleas... and that is precisely what has happened.
Since his days at West
Point, Petraeus has been known as a soldier in a hurry, a man with "stars
in his future." Since rocketing to fame as George W. Bush's point man in
Iraq, Petraeus has managed to successfully walk the tightrope between careerism
and being a "soldier's soldier." An intensely ambitious man, Petraeus
has never shied away from publicity; nor has he ever feared taking risks. After
gaining renown as the architect of Bush's "surge" strategy in Iraq,
Petraeus was ideally-positioned for an eventual entry into politics if he so
chose.
However, in electing
to serve Obama, he may have finally ventured too close to the flame and gotten
burned.
Much-celebrated in
certain military and national security circles for driving the new Army/Marine
Corps counter-insurgency (COIN) doctrine, Petraeus' theories have not held up
nearly as well in combat as in the briefing room; critics charge that his COIN
program and the restrictive rules of engagement under which our forces fight is
getting good men killed to no purpose. Strategically, his COIN doctrine has
proven to be a costly and bloody failure. Critics have also charged Petraeus of
"going native" vis-à-vis Islam, as when he seemed more concerned
about the "Holy Koran" and handling it with gloves, than he did about
freedom of speech or the Bibles his Afghanistan command ordered burned.
Having left the army
in 2011, Petraeus is off the hook for that now, but serving as DCI hasn't
sheltered him from politics - or the "tender mercies" of his bosses.
Having squeezed everything useful from him, Obama and company now feel no
compunction about throwing him to the wolves. Petraeus sealed his fate when he
declined to provide political cover for his bosses over the Benghazi attacks
that claimed four U.S. lives, and by denying CIA culpability in the failure to
send military/agency assets to rescue the beleaguered embassy. Petraeus'
indiscretion was known within the administration well-before the election, but
it was held in reserve by his adversaries as a trump card to play against him
when the time was right. Late in the game, Petraeus modified his position
in an attempt to keep his job, but by then, he was already being measured for
the drop.
There are many
unanswered questions about the scandal. Was Petraeus' affair with Paula Broadwell
simply a matter of chance, or was he the victim of a carefully-orchestrated
takedown by party or parties unknown? Did the White House set up Petraeus as a
way of neutralizing a would-be political opponent? Is Petraeus being punished
for failing to toe the administration line on Benghazi? Does Broadwell work for
a foreign government or interest?
Why did
General Petraeus decide to serve under Obama in the first place? That is the
question that perplexes this writer. There has been no president/commander
in chief in our nation's history as hostile to the traditions and values of the
military as Obama, nor has there been a leader as lawless and lacking in honor
- yet Petraeus seemed to believe that he could serve such a man without getting
dirt on his hands eventually. Time has proven this hope to be a vain one.
Perhaps he hoped that, by remaining on duty, he could somehow protect his men
and spare them some of the hardships to come. There may be other reasons as yet
unknown. Only Petraeus himself knows the answers to these questions.
As unfortunate as this
affair has proven to be for Petraeus and his family personally, the real
tragedy lies in the fact that whatever credibility and moral authority David
Petraeus once possessed as a critic of Obama is severely-damaged if not destroyed. If he is called
before Congress to testify about the events in Benghazi, he will do from a
position of political and personal weakness - which is precisely the outcome
wished for by the White House and its allies. As for Obama and his advisors,
their neo-Stalinist purge of the military continues apace as they eliminate
ideological and political enemies one-by-one, and replace them with
more-compliant individuals.
General Stanley A. McChrystal
USA (ret)
In retirement, Petraeus now joins former
colleague Stanley McChrystal, another general fallen from official grace.
Having been stabbed in the back by their boss, perhaps they will now become
the critics of Obama the republic needs them to be.
Should these men wish
to redeem themselves, they are now ideally-positioned to do so as private
citizens free to speak their minds about the danger to the republic posed by
Obama and his supporters. Here's hoping that both men seize the opportunity
to do so in as public and forthright a manner as possible.
Copyright 2012 Peter
Farmer
US Military-Industrial Media Supports the Greater Good
The Daily Bell
News & Analysis
US Military-Industrial
Media Supports the Greater Good
Thursday, November 15,
2012 – by Staff Report
Dominant Social Theme: It's swell for the US military-industrial complex to counteract terrorist propaganda with its own ...
Free-Market Analysis: The modern US military, certainly post-World War II, has been in the media/propaganda business at home and abroad – but blunt statements about its presentations are hard to come by. It's not something talked about a lot.
We've noticed that military involvement in media matters is becoming more overt in the 21st century. This makes sense to us because we believe the power elite is moving quickly to expand world governance in order to combat the corrosive power of the Internet that has revealed and publicized their plans in some detail.
The heavy hand of the military can be obviously seen in Hollywood now in such movies as "Transformers" and also in biopics about the "killing" of Osama bin Laden, who likely died ten years ago of Marfan Syndrome.
Osama bin Laden Is Dead Again?
This article about the US military from the AP wire would seem to be more of the same, then, though even franker than usual – an escalation, therefore, of a dominant social theme.
The underlying dominant social theme is that the war on terror needs to be combated by whatever means necessary, including out-and-out propaganda efforts by the US military and its surrogates. A subdominant social theme would be that such interference is GOOD.
The really disturbing part of this, again, is the seeming determination to inform the public that the US military-industrial complex is in the media business. It seemingly marks a determined attempt at making clear to the public the range of activities that the US government in the service of Money Power is now pursuing. Here's some more from the article:
"We have seen portal services by al-Shabab for hate and for propaganda, for spreading violence. We are used to seeing that. In contrast we have not seen such news sites before. So it is something completely unique," Osman said.
But although he had noticed prominent articles on the site, which is advertising heavily on other websites, he had not realized it was bankrolled by U.S. military.
The U.S. military and State Department, a partner on the project, say the goal of the sites is to counter propaganda from extremists "by offering accurate, balanced and forward-looking coverage of developments in the region."
"The Internet is a big place, and we are one of many websites out there. Our site aims to provide a moderate voice in contrast to the numerous violent extremist websites," Africom, as the Stuttgart, Germany-based Africa Command is known, said in a written statement.
Al-Shabab and other militants have for years used websites to trade bomb-making skills, to show off gruesome attack videos and to recruit fighters. The U.S. funded websites — which are available in languages like Swahili, Arabic and Somali — rely on freelance writers in the region.
Recent headlines on sabahionline.com show a breadth of seemingly even-handed news. "Death toll in ambush on Kenyan police rises to 31," one headline said. "Ugandan commander visits troops in Somalia," another reads ...
The site, which launched in February, is slowly attracting readers. The military said that Sabahi averages about 4,000 unique visitors and up to 10,000 articles read per day. The site clearly says under the "About" section that it is run by the U.S. military, but many readers may not go to that link.
Once the reality of US involvement has been fully and clinically established, the article begins to offer rationales for the presentation. It quotes someone called Abdirashid Hashi (a "Somalia analyst for the International Crisis Group") as saying that while he didn't realize US's involvement with the website, he has no issues with it. "I don't think they hide it. That's up there. There's an information war going on, so I don't have any problem with that."
Hashi's main worry was that writers hired by the site could be harassed or killed. The article then goes on to mention the expense that involves a "larger project that costs $3 million to pay for reporting, editing, translating, publishing, IT costs and overhead."
Not to worry. US military commanders believe the project "is paying dividends."
Seth Jones, the associate director of the International Security and Defense Policy Center at the Rand Corporation think tank in Washington, said a significant part of the struggle with extremist groups like al-Shabab is ideological and is a battle for the hearts and minds of local populations.
"Based on this reality, the U.S. and other governments should be involved in countering extremist messages on websites and other forms of social media. After all, every Arab government provides substantial money to television, radio, print media, and Internet sites," Jones said.
What is also disturbing about such statements is that they do not recognize the larger reality that the US and the West generally are sponsoring much of the ideology that this website and others like it are supposed to combat.
As we have documented in well over a dozen articles – as have many other alternative media outlets, as well – the upheaval in the Middle East and the fall of secular governments there has been sponsored in part by the CIA, State Department, etc. via such controlled youth movements as AYM.
Saudi Arabia – a bought-and-paid-for resource of this larger campaign – has been spreading fundamentalist Wahhabism for half a century under the benevolent eye of US Intel agencies. The Muslim Brotherhood now being installed in Egypt and elsewhere, another organization said to be influenced by the CIA.
It is Money Power behind all of this. The power elites create religious tension between East and West to advance the prospects of global governance. Out of chaos, order, etc.
What is new and different now is the growing acknowledgement by various power elite facilities – such as the US military-industrial complex – that, yes, they are indeed proactively seeking to influence the sociopolitical conversation by funding various media mechanisms.
This is part and parcel of a trend toward acknowledging the hitherto unacknowledged authoritarianism that sits at the center of Western societies.
Conclusion: It may be an outgrowth of desperation, as the Internet itself has "outed" so much of these previously covert operations. Or it may simply spring from a determination to be more obvious about authoritarian control. We hope it is the former not the latter
Florida restaurateur to impose surcharge for ObamaCare
Just good old american
know how DcSubject: Florida restaurateur to impose surcharge for ObamaCare
The
“free ride” that so many people voted for last week
is coming. Net incomes will go down because of tax increases, and
prices will go up to pay for things like ObamaCare. I hope the Obama
voters are happy. This is what they voted for. They only had one
chance to change their minds, and they threw that chance away on November 6th.
Bruce
-------
“To
renew ties with the past need not always be daydreaming;
it
may be tapping old sources of strength for new tasks.”
–
Simeon Strunsky
Florida
restaurateur to impose surcharge for ObamaCare
Published
November 15, 2012 | FoxNews.com
Advertisement
John
Metz, who operates roughly 40 Denny’s locations and five Hurricane Grill &
Wings franchises, told FoxNews.com intends to add a 5 percent surcharge to
customers’ bill to offset costs for ObamaCare in January 2014 when the
Affordable Care Act is fully implemented.
Get
ready to pay more for your Grand Slam.
A
Florida restaurateur who operates roughly 40 Denny’s locations and five
Hurricane Grill & Wings franchises in Florida, Virginia and Georgia intends
to add a 5 percent surcharge to customers’ bills to offset costs from ObamaCare
beginning in January 2014 when the Affordable Care Act is fully implemented.
“People
are trying to find ways to avoid the penalties and to avoid having to pay for
ObamaCare,” John Metz told FoxNews.com. “Everyone’s looking for a way to not
have to provide insurance for their employees. It’s essentially a huge tax on
all us business people.”
To
further offset the costs, Metz, who oversees roughly 1,200 employees as
president and CEO of RREMC Restaurants, LLC, said he also will slash most of
the staff's time to fewer than 30 hours per week. That change will be announced
to employees next month, he said.
“I
want to explain it to everybody, to let them know what’s coming down the pike,”
he said. “We like to keep our employees informed.”
The
changes will force some front-of-the-house employees to look for second jobs,
Metz said, but he simply cannot afford the penalties associated with ObamaCare.
[pullquote]
“It’s
a great concept,” he said. “We want to have everyone insured. The problem is,
who is going to pay for it and how are we going to accomplish this?”
Under
the current law, employers with more than 50 full-time (or equivalent) workers
will be charged a penalty for the number of employees exceeding 30 full-time
staffers who are not covered. With an average of 35 full-time employees per
location, Metz said the $2,000 penalty would total roughly $70,000 per
restaurant. Current coverage costs Metz up to $6,000 annually per full-time
employee, he said. He currently provides coverage to about 250 employees.
“It’s
going to be a big issue for all of us — for my employees and for me,” said
Metz, who has been in the industry since 1975. “The ones that are working more
than 28 hours, they’re going to act as if I’m cutting their hours and they’ll
have to find another job.”
At
Denny’s restaurants operated by Metz, the average check is $9, he said, meaning
the ObamaCare surcharge if implemented would be 45 cents on that bill. At
Hurricane Grill & Wings locations, where the average bill is $14.50, the
surcharge would total 72 cents.
Metz
said he believes the entire restaurant industry — even high-end locations —
will ultimately embrace the idea.
“That
is what I foresee and that is the easier, least painful way to deal with these
added costs,” he said. “In a true playing field, everybody will impose this,
from McDonald’s to Denny’s to even maybe the fine dining restaurants in order
to have the funds to be able to pay for either insurance or the penalty for not
providing insurance to their employees.”
Metz
also is urging his employees to consider contacting their local elected
officials in hopes of finding another solution to offset his looming increased
costs.
“It’s
never good news, but it is what it is,” Metz said of increasing customers’
checks. “We really should look for a better or different way to pay for
[ObamaCare]. I think what we’re going to ultimately see here is a European-type
system where we have a value added tax or a national sales tax.”
Metz
continued: “I have a choice: try to live within the rules, or go out of
business.”
In a
statement to FoxNews.com, the National Restaurant Association said it’s
“premature” to assess precisely how the health care law will affect individual
businesses.
“We
have warned for some time that the mechanics of the health care law are very
difficult for the restaurant industry, which is a low-margin industry that
works to keep costs down in order to provide value to customers,” said Scott
DeFife, executive vice president of policy and government affairs for the
National Restaurant Association. “All costs, from gas and commodities to labor
and insurance, eventually impact the price on the menu. It is important that
operators get very familiar with the provisions of the law and start planning
for its implementation; however, it’s premature to make a specific assessment
of exactly how the law will affect any individual business because there are so
many details that are unknown.”
SECESSION IS ABSOLUTELY LAWFUL AND DOABLE
SECESSION IS
ABSOLUTELY LAWFUL AND
DOABLE
By:
Michael Silverhawk
National
Refounders Empowerment Center
N.R.E.C
In 1994 I was the crafter of a new proposed amendment to the
constitution called the REFOUNDING AMENDMENT whereby if adopted by 38 states, the super majority
necessary to ratify an amendment, then the Federal Government would have been
dissolved and a new one formed without all the usurpation of power and
tyranny. This move of power was backed
up by the Declaration of Independence.
You know, when government becomes our enemy we have the right and the
“duty” to dissolve said government and establish new guards for our future
security? We were desperately trying to
warn the people that there was a monster on the loose and got our heads into
the noose. You know that now, don't you.
That being understood one must realize that the Federal Government
is the creature of the state republics not the other way around. The several states in 1789 were very wary of
the proposed new central government and would not ratify it until Jefferson
installed the Bill of Rights that further clarified the rights and powers of
the several states and the people, who, by divine right “are” the government.
This contract included their right to secede if they didn't like the way things
were going. IE: The South. This brings
to mind the statement made by Mel Gibson in “The Patriot” film. “Why should I exchange one tyrant 3000 miles
away for 3000 tyrants one mile away.”
It is a silly joke for the states to ask “permission????” of the federal government to secede? You don’t need permission you silly
geese. We the several states have all
the power period. We have all the
wealth, all the money, all the people, all the land and all the guns. We are the sovereigns if we so choose to
exercise it. The federal government
should be on its knees begging for forgiveness.
“Oh please masters, give me one more chance, I promise to shape up and
be good.” What a windfall of wealth and
power for the state governments. We can
form a new Federal Reserve-free treasury to boot and shit-can the income
tax.
What
do they, the federal government actually command, after all? Ten square miles of thieving tyrants,
traitors and criminals. They have forts
and ports in the states that the states can handily take back into their
dominion, period. Whoa, is this treason
talk? No, “they” are guilty of
treason. My talk is as American and as
patriotic as apple pie. This is the talk
and action that founded and established the country in the first place and
inspired freedom all over the world. All
kings and queens had been given their notice.
Times up.
Cozying
up to Sharia law and such? What treason
is this? What happened to Common
Law? That went away in 1871 when all
government became corporate profit centers under Admiralty and commercial law
and we the people were aced out of the deal.
Want to secede and re-boot the organic republic? Here’s
how we do it. 38 states join and
form a confederacy and issue a two-word statement to the feds. “YOU’RE FIRED.” At that point the other 12 states will
follow, believe me. We’ll take if from
here, thank you. People joined the
military to defend us, not you and your crimes.
And let us not forget the 26 million man milita. They ARE us.
So. “Do you feel lucky?
Why
not have the new capital in say, RICHMOND, Virginia? DC could become a
national park and museum. A lesson in eternal vigilance being the price
of liberty.
Republic New Declaration Of Independence Oct 2012
The New Declaration
of Independence 21 October 2012
The men and women on the
Continental United States of America, bound together by their mutual knowledge
of the abuses to We THE People by the present corporate government has
assembled to fill the vacant seats of the lawfull de jure government of the United
States of America.
The corporate government that
people accept today as the government is not the Republican form of government that
the founders gave us. We The People assembled
in Michigan to restore the Republican form of government have met and completed
this task.
In the year 1861 when Congress adjourned
sine die (sine die means “without setting a return date”), it left the nation
without a congress to conduct lawfull business.
After determining the condition
of Michigan's federal legislative offices, the Assembly re-seated those de jure
offices and conducted the necessary functions to establish a working congress.
As a result, we have filled the office of the President of the United States of
America with an interim office holder.
The de jure republican form of government established the authority to
move the military by orders from the civilian authority to act in compliance
with the Oath to defend the Constitution and the Republic against all enemies
Foreign and Domestic.
This is the culmination of thirty-two
(32) months of assembly meetings, research, debating and recording the findings
of the members of the assembly to compile the evidence of the corporate United
States corruption and crimes perpetrated against We THE People. We THE People in general assembly determined
that the only resolution to the current situation was to populate the vacant de
jure seats of the Republic and notice and inform the corporate “ACTORS” their
authority does not apply to our form of government. The Michigan General Jural Assembly has
served "Notice" to corporate government officers at all levels
including Local, State, National and International notices under Affidavits of
Publication and direct service at their physical offices.
All levels of corporate government
have been served with notices that We THE People object to the lies and
deception. We THE People intend to
peacefully continue to fill the de jure seats of government which remains
unchallenged and to initiate a lawfull election to fill all legislative offices
of the Republic. It is also We THE
People’s intent to audit all government branches and to hold accountable all
corrupt politicians and others.
Enclosed:
·
The new Declaration
of Independence
·
The Orders
NEW DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE
The Orders
RPost Receipt
===========================================================
===========================================================
The New Declaration
of Independence 21 October 2012
The
men and women on the Continental United States of America, bound together by
their mutual knowledge of the abuses to We THE People by the present corporate
government has assembled to fill the vacant seats of the lawfull de jure
government of the United States of America.
The
corporate government that people accept today as the government is not the
Republican form of government that the founders gave us. We The People assembled in Michigan to restore
the Republican form of government have met and completed this task.
In
the year 1861 when Congress adjourned sine die (sine die means “without setting
a return date”), it left the nation without a congress to conduct lawfull
business.
After
determining the condition of Michigan's federal legislative offices, the
Assembly re-seated those de jure offices and conducted the necessary functions
to establish a working congress. As a result, we have filled the office of the President
of the United States of America with an interim office holder. The de jure republican form of government established
the authority to move the military by orders from the civilian authority to act
in compliance with the Oath to defend the Constitution and the Republic against
all enemies Foreign and Domestic.
This
is the culmination of thirty-two (32) months of assembly meetings, research,
debating and recording the findings of the members of the assembly to compile
the evidence of the corporate United States corruption and crimes perpetrated
against We THE People. We THE People in
general assembly determined that the only resolution to the current situation
was to populate the vacant de jure seats of the Republic and notice and inform
the corporate “ACTORS” their authority does not apply to our form of government. The Michigan General Jural Assembly has
served "Notice" to corporate government officers at all levels
including Local, State, National and International notices under Affidavits of
Publication and direct service at their physical offices.
All
levels of corporate government have been served with notices that We THE People
object to the lies and deception. We THE
People intend to peacefully continue to fill the de jure seats of government which
remains unchallenged and to initiate a lawfull election to fill all legislative
offices of the Republic. It is also We
THE People’s intent to audit all government branches and to hold accountable
all corrupt politicians and others.
Enclosed:
·
The new Declaration of Independence,
·
The Orders and
·
RPost Receipt
This
is your call to action:
We
THE People of Michigan encourage all remaining states to determine the status
of your 1861 federal legislators (senators, representatives), establish
original jurisdiction by reseating these members of congress and have them sign
onto the new Declaration of Independence and concur with the actions taken on
21st of October 2012.
For
those states that do not have an 1861 federal congress, they should determine
what congress was at the time of state hood for their particular state.
Please
note: we have reestablished the original 13th amendment which means
“NO LAWYERS”.
·
Operations
& Functions, Covenant , County Settlement, Montcalm County Settlement -
Affidavit of Publication
·
Declaration Of Intent, Declaration of Unalienable Rights, Jural
Covenant of Office
·
Letter to Judge Advocate General
·
Letter to Michigan Sheriffs
·
Hague List of Documents and receipt
·
Wall Street Journal Publication
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
