Monday, August 12, 2013

'THE GENERALS' - DESTRUCTION OF MILITARY HIGH COMMAND & CLUELESS COC

FROM A READER: 'THE GENERALS' - DESTRUCTION OF MILITARY HIGH COMMAND & CLUELESS COC
Posted By: Seawitch [Send E-Mail]
Date: Monday, 12-Aug-2013 03:22:52
FROM A READER.....
"The Generals" - Destruction of Military High Command & Clueless COC
I am sure you have read some of my thoughts regarding our current CMC, so I will not repeat them, especially since I don't give a ##### about what might come down on me for such, but I would hate to see my friends hit with crap from above for even reading my thoughts. The entire JCS to me is a bunch of self-serving yes men, and more and more it seems that the flag and general officer corps is falling into a similar line. Why hasn't a senior Army officer raised merry hell over the facts that (a), the Fort Hood shootings have not been classified as domestic terror acts - restricting benefits to the survivors - and (b), why it has taken so long to bring Hassan to trial, during which time he has continued to draw all pay and allowances? Don't get me off my soapbox - actually I like it up here, can see things I never knew existed due to my vertical challenging. Semper Fi. Amigos.
I'm so good that vitamins are taking Me
**********************************************
"The Generals" - Destruction of Military High Command & Clueless CinC
The author's characterization of General Dempsey is harsh, biting and right on!!!
He indirectly damns the rest of the senior officers and for good reason.
The president or at least the people around him seem determined
to destroy the character of our military and best I can
tell they are doing a very effective job of it.
Anonymous

The Generals
Very interesting article regarding the destruction of the military high command and a Commander-in-Chief who is clueless.
When you read this and see the type of individuals who have become and are becoming flag officers, you may have thoughts similar to these:  
Has the apparent absence of personal integrity, ethics and ignorance of their oath all members of the DOD military and civilian are required to take in our military leadership contributed to the current problems of soldier suicides,
sexual harassment, and other growing misdeeds of our military?

General Dempsey, as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, is without a doubt the most disgraceful person to ever fill that position.
Are we in trouble? Think about it!
During the Bush administration there were only two American commanders of the International Security Assistance Force in Afghanistan. Under Obama there have so far been five. There has been a new ISAF commander nearly every single year that Obama has been in office. The only exception is 2012 when Obama was too busy trying to win an election to bother further sabotaging a losing war.
The parade of musical chair generals began when Obama
demanded the resignation of General McKiernan. The Washington Post called the firing of a wartime commander a "rare decision."
It was the first time since the days of General Douglas MacArthur
that a four-star commanding general had been purged during a war.

The decision may have been rare, but it was not unexpected.
General McKiernan was fired for the same offense that General McArthur had been targeted during the Korean War: He had demanded competency from an incompetent Democrat.

McKiernan had embarrassed Obama by demanding more troops to fight the war. The situation came to a head as General McKiernan pressed an indecisive Obama to make a decision. It was a devastating scene for an administration which had covered its pivot away from Iraq with concern trolling about winning in Afghanistan. The troops would be delivered, but McKiernan would pay the price.
General McKiernan's firing was put down to the need for fresh ideas. McKiernan was deemed too "old school" because he wanted to fight an old-fashioned war against the Taliban while Obama Inc. believed that the war couldn't be won by beating the Taliban, but by winning the hearts and minds of Afghans.
It was a fashionable and doomed strategy that required sacrificing the lives and limbs of thousands of American soldiers to political correctness.

The old-school general who had once said, "I don't understand ever putting your men and women in harm's way, without their having the full ability to protect themselves. That also means operating on actionable intelligence to defeat insurgents, and protect your forces. That's how you keep your soldiers alive," was clearly not the man for that job.
Replacing him as ISAF commander was General McChrystal.
McChrystal was everything that McKiernan wasn't. He was hip fresh blood. He voted for Obama, listened to the right music and
was a big fan of counterinsurgency. He hooked up with Greg Mortenson and handed out copies of Three Cups of Tea to his staff. The book proved to be a fraud and so did the COIN strategy for winning over the Afghans.

American soldiers were prevented from defending themselves to avoid offending the Afghans and the war was not moving forward.
McChrystal claimed that he had presented a plan to Washington for defeating the Taliban, but Washington only wanted their capabilities degraded. The relationship between McChrystal and Obama also degraded, and McChrystal was fired over a negative Rolling Stone article that revealed that the ISAF commander held Obama and his cronies in contempt.

Urgently, Obama swapped out General McChrystal for General Petraeus, a former enemy now turned wartime ally. In only two years, Obama had gone through three generals and fired two wartime four-star generals, setting a new record for mismanaging a war.
Petraeus's move from Central Command to commanding the ISAF was unprecedented and did not last long. With the Taliban undefeated and the conflict shifting from a military war to a campaign of drone strikes and targeted assassinations, General Petraeus shifted over to the CIA to command the new fallback position of the war effort as Director Petraeus.
But a year later, Petraeus met the same fate as McKiernan and McChrystal after alienating the CIA top brass which enmeshed him in a scandal. It did not help matters any that Republicans were salivating over the idea of a Petraeus candidacy in 2016.
Petraeus had been replaced by General Allen, who became enmeshed in the same scandal, and the confirmation hearings of his replacement, General Dunford, were sped up. This month, Dunford has taken command of an ISAF in retreat as Afghanistan
has become the new Iraq. And Dunford has become the fifth ISAF commander under Obama. Of his four predecessors, all have ended their careers under a cloud.

The War in Afghanistan has been lost and so have the careers of most of its commanders. Obama has constantly swapped out generals, and unlike the rotating allied ISAF commanders during the Bush era, many of them were fired because they threatened Obama politically in some way.
The record is an ugly one, but it is not limited to the war theater in Afghanistan. After the Benghazi disaster, General Carter Ham of AFRICOM was reportedly edged out after telling a Republican Congressman that he had not received any requests for support. His replacement, General Rodriguez, had earlier taken over part of McKiernan's job after Obama had forced him out.
More recently General Mattis, the commander of United States Central Command, Petraeus's old job, was booted out without even a personal phone call for being too hawkish about Iran. The insult was unprecedented and the reason was the same. Like McKiernan and McChrystal, Mattis had offended important people in the Obama administration. And for that he paid the price.
General Dempsey, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, exemplifies the costs of career survival in the age of Obama. Dempsey echoes everything that the civilians tell him. He never disagrees with them in public and likely not in private. Whatever new gimmick comes out of the White House, whether it's Green Energy or homosexuality, he's right there behind it and out in front of it.
Dempsey has no ideas of his own and he doesn't need any. He has nothing to bring to the table except a willingness to act as Obama's pet parrot in a uniform. When McChrystal first met Obama, he recalled thinking that Obama was "uncomfortable and
intimidated" by the room full of military brass. That observation helped get McChrystal fired and these days it's the military brass that feels uncomfortable and intimidated by Obama Inc.

SOURCE: FPM
Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, is a New York writer focusing on radical Islam. He is completing a book on the international challenges America faces in the 21st century.
http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=284471


The Breitling Currrency Report

It's the modus operandi of the banksters; they've done it several times in this nations HIStory, alone. The crash of 1811 was one of the first. See: [...] PAPER MONEY If the colonists forgot the lessons of goldsmith bankers, the American Revolution refreshed their memories. To finance the war, Congress authorized the printing of continental bills of credit in an amount not to exceed $200,000,000. The States issued another $200,000,000 in paper notes. Ultimately, the value of the paper money fell so low that they were soon traded on speculation from 5000 to 1000 paper bills for one coin. It's often suggested that the U.S. Constitution's prohibition against a paper economy -- "No State shall... make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a tender in Payment of Debts" -- was a tool of the wealthy to be worked to the disadvantage of all others. But only in a "paper" economy can money reproduce itself and increase the claims of the wealthy at the expense of the productive. "Paper money," said Pelatiah Webster, "polluted the equity of our laws, turned them into engines of oppression, corrupted the justice of our public administration, destroyed the fortunes of thousands who had confidence in it, enervated the trade, husbandry, and manufactures of U.S. country, and went far to destroy the morality of U.S. people." CONSPIRACIES A few examples of the attempts by the monarchies and banks that almost succeeded in destroying the United States: According to the Tennessee Laws (1715-1820, vol. II, p. 774), in the 1794 Jay Treaty, the United States agreed to pay 600,000 pounds sterling to King George III, as reparations for the American revolution. The Senate ratified the treaty in secret session and ordered that it not be published. When Benjamin Franklin's grandson published it anyway, the exposure and resulting public uproar so angered the Congress that it passed the Alien and Sedition Acts (1798) so federal judges could prosecute editors and publishers for reporting the truth about the government. Does the reader understand the significance of that last sentence about WHY CONgress passed the Alien and Sedition Act, and does it give you pause on just who the traitors are? (The Snowden fallout is a perfect example of twisted logic by bought and paid for cronies in high places...) continuing Since we had won the Revolutionary War, why would U.S. Senators agree to pay reparations to the loser? And why would they agree to pay 600,000 pounds sterling, eleven years after the war ended? It doesn't make sense, especially in light of Senate's secrecy and later fury over being exposed, unless we assume U.S. Senators had been bribed to serve the British monarchy and betray the American people. That's subversion. The United States Bank had been opposed by the Jeffersonians from the beginning, but the Federalists (the pro-monarchy party) won out in its establishment. The initial capitalization was $10,000,000 -- 80% of which would be owned by foreign bankers. Since the bank was authorized to lend up to $20,000,000 (double its paid in capital), it was a profitable deal for both the government and the bankers since they could lend, and collect interest on, $10,000,000 that didn't exist. However, the European bankers outfoxed the government and by 1796, the government owed the bank $6,200,000 and was forced to sell its shares. (By 1802, the U.S. government owned no stock in the United States Bank.) The sheer power of the banks and their ability to influence representative government by economic manipulation and outright bribery was exposed in 1811, when the people discovered that European banking interests owned 80% of the bank. Congress therefore refused to renew the bank's charter. This led to the withdrawal of $7,000,000 in specie by European investors, which in turn, precipitated an economic recession, and the War of 1812. That's destruction. There are undoubtedly other examples of the monarchy's efforts to subvert or destroy the United States; some are common knowledge, others remain to be disclosed to the public. [...] From: Just Chillin: The Missing 13th Amendment Part 1 http://netteandme.blogspot.com/2013/07/the-missing-13th-amendment-part-1.html and http://www.lawfulpath.com/ref/13th-amend.shtml In a message dated 8/12/2013 9:10:38 A.M. EDT, v.k.d. wrote: In case you did not know.. this is how they bankrupted the United States the first time, which was reflected in 1907.. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/features/general-article/tcrr-scandal/ Just in case you didn't know... JP MORGAN and "THE BOYZ" WERE BEHIND THIS ALSO.. The Financial Panic of 1907: Running from History Just over 100 years ago, Americans panicked as brokerage firms went bankrupt and investors pulled their money out of banks, instigating a nation-wide crisis http://www.smithsonianmag.com/history-archaeology/1907_Panic.html Read more: http://www.smithsonianmag.com/history-archaeology/1907_Panic.html#ixzz2blB1OGAz Follow us: @SmithsonianMag on Twitter The Panic of 1907, also known as the 1907 Bankers' Panic or Knickerbocker Crisis,[1] was a financial crisis that occurred in the United States when the New York Stock Exchange fell almost 50% from its peak the previous year. Panic occurred, as this was during a time of economic recession, and there were numerous runs on banks and trust companies. The 1907 panic eventually spread throughout the nation when many state and local banks and businesses entered bankruptcy. Primary causes of the run include a retraction of market liquidity by a number of New York City banks and a loss of confidence among depositors, exacerbated by unregulated side bets at bucket shops.[2] The panic was triggered by the failed attempt in October 1907 to corner the market on stock of the United Copper Company. When this bid failed, banks that had lent money to the cornering scheme suffered runs that later spread to affiliated banks and trusts, leading a week later to the downfall of the Knickerbocker Trust Company—New York City's third-largest trust. The collapse of the Knickerbocker spread fear throughout the city's trusts as regional banks withdrew reserves from New York City banks. Panic extended across the nation as vast numbers of people withdrew deposits from their regional banks. The panic might have deepened if not for the intervention of financier J. P. Morgan,[3] who pledged large sums of his own money, and convinced other New York bankers to do the same, to shore up the banking system. At the time, the United States did not have a central bank to inject liquidity back into the market. By November the financial contagion had largely ended, yet a further crisis emerged when a large brokerage firm borrowed heavily using the stock of Tennessee Coal, Iron and Railroad Company (TC&I) as collateral. Collapse of TC&I's stock price was averted by an emergency takeover by Morgan's U.S. Steel Corporation—a move approved by anti-monopolist president Theodore Roosevelt. The following year, Senator Nelson W. Aldrich, father-in-law of John D. Rockefeller, Jr., established and chaired a commission to investigate the crisis and propose future solutions, leading to the creation of the Federal Reserve System.[4][5] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panic_of_1907 1. Crédit Mobilier of America scandal - Wikipedia, the free ... 1. http://www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crédit_Mobilier_of_America_scandal • Background| • Transgression| • Investigation and outcome| • See also 1. The Crédit Mobilier scandal of 1872 involved the Union Pacific Railroad and the Crédit Mobilier of America (no relation to the French Credit Mobilier) construction ... 1. Crédit Mobilier - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia http://www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crédit_Mobilier Crédit Mobilier was a French banking company, and one of the most important financial institutions of the world during the 19th century. It had a major role in the ... 2. The Credit Mobilier Scandal . Transcontinental Railroad ... http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/features/genera l... For Union Pacific executive Thomas Durant, it was a money-making machine. It was a revolutionary business model previously unknown on American soil. 3. Credit Mobilier Scandal (American history) -- Encyclopedia ... www.britannica.com/.../topic/142332/Credit-Mobilier-Scandal Crédit Mobilier Scandal, in U.S. history, illegal manipulation of contracts by a construction and finance company associated with the building of the Union Pacific ... 4. Credit mobilier | Define Credit mobilier at Dictionary.com http://www.dictionary.reference.com/browse/credit+mobilier noun U.S. History . a joint-stock company organized in 1863 and reorganized in 1867 to build the Union Pacific Railroad. It was involved in a scandal in 1872 in which ... 5. The Crédit Mobilier - Union Pacific Railroad http://www.cprr.org/Museum/Credit_Mobilier_1873.html "A Complete and Graphic Account of the Crédit Mobilier Investigation" from "Behind the Scenes in Washington" By Edward Winslow Martin. The Continental Publishing ... 6. Crédit Mobilier of America: Information from Answers.com http://www.answers.com/topic/cr-dit-mobilier-of-america-scandal Crédit Mobilier of America, the classic case of corruption in the Gilded Age, concerned conflict of interest and institutional duplicity. When in 1862 Congress ... 7. HowStuffWorks "Credit Mobilier of America" http://www.history.howstuffworks.com/.../credit-mobilier-of-america.htm The Credit Mobilier of America played an important role in North American history. Learn more about the Credit Mobilier of America at HowStuffWorks. 8. Credit mobilier - definition of Credit mobilier by the Free ... http://www.thefreedictionary.com/Credit+mobilier Cre`dit´ mo`bi`lier´ (m?`b?`ly?´) 1. A joint stock company, formed for general banking business, or for the construction of public works, by means of loans on ... 9. Crédit Mobilier — History.com Articles, Video, Pictures ... www.history.com/topics/credit-mobilier Cached The Securities and Exchange Commission was established in 1934 to regulate the commerce in stocks, bonds, and other securities. A 1973 embargo by oil-rich Arab ... 10. Ad related to credit mobilier • Credit Mobilier at Amazon http://www.Amazon.com/Credit Mobilier Free 2-Day Shipping w/ Amazon Prime! Low Prices on Millions of Books. Also Try credit mobilier affair whiskey ring credit mobilier of america whiskey ring scandal credit mobilier 1872 compromise of 1877 credit mobilier company credit mobilier wikipedia Get the latest updates on credit mobilier More search results 1 2 3 4 5 Next

It's the modus operandi of the banksters; they've done it several times in this nations HIStory, alone. The crash of 1811 was one of the first. See:

[...]

PAPER MONEY

If the colonists forgot the lessons of goldsmith bankers, the American Revolution refreshed their memories. To finance the war, Congress authorized the printing of continental bills of credit in an amount not to exceed $200,000,000. The States issued another $200,000,000 in paper notes. Ultimately, the value of the paper money fell so low that they were soon traded on speculation from 5000 to 1000 paper bills for one coin. It's often suggested that the U.S. Constitution's prohibition against a paper economy -- "No State shall... make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a tender in Payment of Debts" -- was a tool of the wealthy to be worked to the disadvantage of all others. But only in a "paper" economy can money reproduce itself and increase the claims of the wealthy at the expense of the productive. "Paper money," said Pelatiah Webster, "polluted the equity of our laws, turned them into engines of oppression, corrupted the justice of our public administration, destroyed the fortunes of thousands who had confidence in it, enervated the trade, husbandry, and manufactures of U.S. country, and went far to destroy the morality of U.S. people."

 CONSPIRACIES

A few examples of the attempts by the monarchies and banks that almost succeeded in destroying the United States: According to the Tennessee Laws (1715-1820, vol. II, p. 774), in the 1794 Jay Treaty, the United States agreed to pay 600,000 pounds sterling to King George III, as reparations for the American revolution. The Senate ratified the treaty in secret session and ordered that it not be published. When Benjamin Franklin's grandson published it anyway, the exposure and resulting public uproar so angered the Congress that it passed the Alien and Sedition Acts (1798) so federal judges could prosecute editors and publishers for reporting the truth about the government.

Does the reader understand the significance of that last sentence about WHY CONgress passed the Alien and Sedition Act, and does it give you pause on just who the traitors are? (The Snowden fallout is a perfect example of twisted logic by bought and paid for cronies in high places...) continuing

Since we had won the Revolutionary War, why would U.S. Senators agree to pay reparations to the loser? And why would they agree to pay 600,000 pounds sterling, eleven years after the war ended? It doesn't make sense, especially in light of Senate's secrecy and later fury over being exposed,

The sheer power of the banks and their ability to influence representative governs-serif; font-size: 10pt;"> The United States Bank had been opposed by the Jeffersonians from the beginning, but the Federalists (the pro-monarchy party) won out in its establishment. The initial capitalization was $10,000,000 -- 80% of which would be owned by foreign bankers. Since the bank was authorized to lend up to $20,000,000 (double its paid in capital), it was a profitable deal for both the government and the bankers since they could lend, and collect interest on, $10,000,000 that didn't exist. However, the European bankers outfoxed the government and by 1796, the government owed the bank $6,200,000 and was forced to sell its shares. (By 1802, the U.S. government owned no stock in the United States Bank.)

The sheer power of the banks and their ability to influence representative government by economic manipulation and outright bribery was exposed in 1811, when the people discovered that European banking interests owned 80% of the bank. Congress therefore refused to renew the bank's charter. This led to the withdrawal of $7,000,000 in specie by European investors, which in turn, precipitated an economic recession, and the War of 1812. That's destruction.

There are undoubtedly other examples of the monarchy's efforts to subvert or destroy the United States; some are common knowledge, others remain to be disclosed to the public. [...]


In a message dated 8/12/2013 9:10:38 A.M. EDT, v.k.d. wrote:
 
In case you did not know.. this is how they bankrupted the United States the first time, which was reflected in 1907..
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/features/general-article/tcrr-scandal/
Just in case you didn't know... JP MORGAN and "THE BOYZ" WERE BEHIND THIS ALSO.. 

The Financial Panic of 1907: Running from History

Just over 100 years ago, Americans panicked as brokerage firms went bankrupt and investors pulled their money out of banks, instigating a nation-wide crisis http://www.smithsonianmag.com/history-archaeology/1907_Panic.html


Read more: http://www.smithsonianmag.com/history-archaeology/1907_Panic.html#ixzz2blB1OGAz
Follow us: @SmithsonianMag on Twitter


The Panic of 1907, also known as the 1907 Bankers' Panic or Knickerbocker Crisis,[1] was a financial crisis that occurred in the United States when the New York Stock Exchange fell almost 50% from its peak the previous year. Panic occurred, as this was during a time of economic recession, and there were numerous runs on banks and trust companies. The 1907 panic eventually spread throughout the nation when many state and local banks and businesses entered bankruptcy. Primary causes of the run include a retraction of market liquidity by a number of New York City banks and a loss of confidence among depositors, exacerbated by unregulated side bets at bucket shops.[2] The panic was triggered by the failed attempt in October 1907 to corner the market on stock of the United Copper Company. When this bid failed, banks that had lent money to the cornering scheme suffered runs that later spread to affiliated banks and trusts, leading a week later to the downfall of the Knickerbocker Trust Company—New York City's third-largest trust. The collapse of the Knickerbocker spread fear throughout the city's trusts as regional banks withdrew reserves from New York City banks. Panic extended across the nation as vast numbers of people withdrew deposits from their regional banks.

The panic might have deepened if not for the intervention of financier J. P. Morgan,[3] who pledged large sums of his own money, and convinced other New York bankers to do the same, to shore up the banking system. At the time, the United States did not have a central bank to inject liquidity back into the market. By November the financial contagion had largely ended, yet a further crisis emerged when a large brokerage firm borrowed heavily using the stock of Tennessee Coal, Iron and Railroad Company (TC&I) as . Collapse of TC&I's stock price was averted by an emergency takeover by Morgan's U.S. Steel Corporation—a move approved by anti-monopolist president Theodore Roosevelt. The following year, Senator Nelson W. Aldrich, father-in-law of John D. Rockefeller, Jr., established and chaired a commission to investigate the crisis and propose future solutions, leading to the creation of the Federal Reserve System.[4][5] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panic_of_1907

1.    Crédit Mobilier of America scandal - Wikipedia, the free ...

  1. http://www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crédit_Mobilier_of_America_scandal   
  1. The Crédit Mobilier scandal of 1872 involved the Union Pacific Railroad and the Crédit Mobilier of America (no relation to the French Credit Mobilier) construction ...

1.    Crédit Mobilier - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Crédit Mobilier was a French banking company, and one of the most important financial institutions of the world during the 19th century. It had a major role in the ...

2.    The Credit Mobilier Scandal . Transcontinental Railroad ...

For Union Pacific executive Thomas Durant, it was a money-making machine. It was a revolutionary business model previously unknown on American soil.

3.    Credit Mobilier Scandal (American history) -- Encyclopedia ...

Crédit Mobilier Scandal, in U.S. history, illegal manipulation of contracts by a construction and finance company associated with the building of the Union Pacific ...

4.    Credit mobilier | Define Credit mobilier at Dictionary.com

noun U.S. History . a joint-stock company organized in 1863 and reorganized in 1867 to build the Union Pacific Railroad. It was involved in a scandal in 1872 in which ...

5.    The Crédit Mobilier - Union Pacific Railroad

"A Complete and Graphic Account of the Crédit Mobilier Investigation" from "Behind the Scenes in Washington" By Edward Winslow Martin. The Continental Publishing ...

6.    Crédit Mobilier of America: Information from Answers.com

Crédit Mobilier of America, the classic case of corruption in the Gilded Age, concerned conflict of interest and institutional duplicity. When in 1862 Congress ...

7.    HowStuffWorks "Credit Mobilier of America"

The Credit Mobilier of America played an important role in North American history. Learn more about the Credit Mobilier of America at HowStuffWorks.

8.    Credit mobilier - definition of Credit mobilier by the Free ...

Cre`dit´ mo`bi`lier´ (m?`b?`ly?´) 1. A joint stock company, formed for general banking business, or for the construction of public works, by means of loans on ...

9.    Crédit Mobilier — History.com Articles, Video, Pictures ...

The Securities and Exchange Commission was established in 1934 to regulate the commerce in stocks, bonds, and other securities. A 1973 embargo by oil-rich Arab ...

10.               Ad related to credit mobilier

Also Try

More search results


2  3  4  5  Next

KINGDOM-FINANCES AND THE TRUE CORPORATE MINISTRIES OF THE REMNANT CHURCH

Subject: Fire By Night - August 12th 2013

         ...."You, in Your great compassion, did not forsake them in the wilderness; The pillar of cloud did not leave them by day, to guide them on their way, nor the pillar of fire by night, to light for them the way in which they were to go".... Nehemiah 9:19 NASB

August 12th 2013

KINGDOM-FINANCES AND THE TRUE CORPORATE MINISTRIES OF THE REMNANT CHURCH

Words of Prophecy
 
*       Obedience in the handling of "Kingdom-finances" is inseparably linked to a heart "wholly given".

*       Just because one has the "finances" to carry out My Will, it does not necessarily mean that that in itself is enough - an "abiding wisdom" must be applied at all times in any given situation.

*       If finances are not both given and received by "revelation knowledge" they will not bear "maximum fruit" for the Church and the Kingdom and, in fact, will only serve to hinder the unfolding of the "fullness" of My plan.     
*       All of the answers to the prayers of My children concerning believing me for "finances" [and the meeting of "specific needs"] are dependent upon a perfect obedience on their behalf. This is in NO WAY a call to "earn" the blessing. It is simply a call to each one of My children to position themselves perfectly [both spiritually and physically] in order that they might continually access exactly what is needed from their heavenly account in any given moment and situation. For truly I say to you, all those who have called upon Me from their heart already have obtained their precious inheritance in Christ. It is now simply a matter of accessing the fullness of it through the exercising of an absolute faith - working through a perfect love - and manifesting in a perfect obedience. For as they go forth abiding in perfect obedience day to day .I shall not be hindered from bestowing upon them a super abundance of wealth and riches - revelation, finances and all else that pertains to life and godliness in the carrying out of My highest purposes.

*       In this season I shall make many ministries of this Third Day [both individual and corporate] "sovereignly" wealthy in the realm of Kingdom finances, and they shall go forth and carry out My perfect purpose and highest will - devoid of the entanglements and hindrances of the religious mind-sets and mental ascensions to My true [divine] prosperity that became rampant in the "second day" - through coveteousness and unbelief.  For - up until this time - religious bondage and the love of money have kept My church in relative poverty compared to that which I have truly ordained for her. Let it be clearly understood that the Kingdom finances I speak of are a powerful and perfect extension of the authority of My Dear Son, and in this final hour those of My children who will "abide" in My wisdom [Isaiah 23:18] shall surely use all that which I bless them with to turn Satan's world [schemes and strongholds] upside down - and many captives shall be set free from financial bondage - and every other bondage that has plagued them. For the "gospel of the Kingdom" shall go forth unhindered through the unlimited finances that shall come into the hands of My faithful ones, and I shall make them great "signs and wonders" in the midst of the nations - and, because of these things, the absolute truths of My Word shall become clearly evident throughout the earth to all those whose hearts are "toward" Me [the One True God].

"sovereignly" - exercising or possessing supreme authority or juristiction; independent, and free from external authority or influence [in this case, ANY external authority or influence that is apart from Christ];
 
VISION:

        The Father showed me airplanes [powerful jets] landing one after another. These "airplanes" represented the coming forth of the true corporate ministries of the remnant Church [and also individual Christians raised up in the gifting of Kingdom finance] - and the finances [resources] they would give to the "true works" of God in this final hour in order to establish absolute truth concerning the Glorious Church, the Kingdom and the "fullness" of our salvation [inheritance] in Christ.

The Father spoke to me and said:

*       So shall it be in these days, My beloved ones, as I establish those who truly serve Me in the fullness of their precious Kingdom-position and destiny, in Christ. For I shall pour out My blessings [both financial and otherwise] upon those I have raised up "for such a time as this", and they shall literally turn the world upside down in their obedience with the aforementioned Kingdom finances. Satan and his forces will not be able to stand before My Glorious Church in this final hour and, truly I say to you, they [and their strongholds] shall be continually devastated - both now and in the glorious days ahead. And, because of these things, many captives shall enter into a perfect liberty - a perfect liberty that will both empower and position them to serve me with ALL of their heart.

                      
                                                            

The Obama Nation Leftist Politics and the Cult of Personality, by Jerome Corsi

The Obama Nation
Leftist Politics and the Cult of Personality, by Jerome Corsi


(Click for Amazon book review)


BOOK REVIEW by OnTheIssues.org:
If you've ever listened to conservative Talk Radio's and wondered, "Where do they come up with this stuff?", well, this book is it. There are other sources, but this book is one of the key source materials for attacks on Obama. That's because the author, Jerome Corsi, wrote the anti-Kerry book that provided the fodder which killed Kerry's candidacy. Corsi co-authored "Unfit For Command: Swift Boat Veterans Speak Out Against John Kerry", which dominated the presidential campaign in 2004. Corsi and the conservative Talk Radio hosts were hoping for another knockout blow with this book in 2008. "Obama Nation" failed where the Swift Boat attack succeeded for three major reasons.
First, Kerry was susceptible to the Swift Boat attack because it attacked his strength: Kerry based his campaign on his military service and "Unfit for Command" diminished the importance of his service. "Obama Nation" attacks Obama primarily for his associations: like Rev. Wright; Bill Ayres; Tony Rezko; and Saul Alinsky. But Obama didn't base his campaign on his associations, so the public viewed this attack as peripheral to the campaign.
Second, Kerry failed to respond to the Swift Boat attacks, while Obama promptly responded. Yes, each of the "guilt-by-association" attacks on Obama dominated the news for a week -- but then they faded away. Kerry's attack should have done the same -- but Kerry never responded, so it never faded away. Kerry ignored the Swift Boaters until it was too late. Obama learned that lesson, and responded to each attack with a substantive speech in which he not only explained his side of the story, but also changed his behavior to address the attack (e.g., he quit Rev. Wright's church).
Third, the "Swift Boat" attack rang true at its core, while the "Obama Nation" attack did not. Neither attack was literally true -- both of Corsi's books distorted the facts and presented both candidates in the worst possible light. But the subtext of the "Swift Boat" attack was that Kerry answered questions about his Vietnam record with shades of truth, and by extension Kerry answered every question with shades of truth. That core attack felt true to the public. The subtext of the "Obama Nation" attack is that Obama's associates are corrupt, criminal, and/or anti-American, and by extension that Obama's presidential administration would be corrupt, criminal, and/or anti-American. That just did not ring true to the public. The title of the book is a play on the term "abomination" -- Corsi says that Obama's presidency would be an abomination of corrupt criminal anti-Americanism -- and the public simply rejected that opinion.
* * *
Ok, so what are the specifics of the "Obama Nation" attack? Anyone reading campaign news in the summer and autumn of 2008 is familiar with most of them:
  1. Rev. Jeremiah Wright gets an entire chapter: chapter 7 in part two, "The Making of a Radical Politician" (pp. 176-208). Corsi explains that Wright is a "Black Liberation theologian," and that because Obama knew must have known that, he was therefore a radical. Obama responded by disassociating himself from Rev. Wright's words, then from his church.
  2. Bill Ayres was a member of the Weather Underground (a 1960s radical group), who was convicted of terrorism and served a sentence. Ayres was (years later) Obama's neighbor, as well as serving on some organization's boards together (p. 146-8). Corsi never accuses Obama of agreeing with the Weather Underground's principles; just of associating with one of its members. Obama responded by pointing out that the Republican Governor of South Carolina similarly served on boards with Ayres.
  3. Tony Rezko also gets a full chapter, "The Chicago Way" (pp. 152-175). Rezko was corrupt, and supported Obama in many campaigns as well as in Obama buying his home -- and therefore, according to Corsi, Obama is corrupt by association. But Corsi goes too far in associating, as he went too far in the "Swift Boat" attack by making Kerry seem the worst officer in Vietnam. In Obama's case, Corsi goes too far by associating Obama via Rezko to Saddam Hussein (because Rezko did business with Nadhmi Auchi, Saddam Hussein's cousin). The extreme "guilt by association" weakens the anti-Obama attacks by being too extreme and hence non-credible.
  4. Saul Alinsky gets mentioned frequently as Obama's philosophical mentor (the same Saul Alinsky who is claimed as Hillary Clinton's philosophical mentor). On page 159, for example, Corsi writes that Obama "was instructed in the Machiavellian power politics of Saul Alinsky's radical activism." The problem here is that Alinsky is a well-respected community organizer -- I myself have been similarly "instructed," and have followed, many of Alinsky's methods, because they are well-established as successful community organizing methods. Alinsky's methods work to politically empower disempowered groups, including black communities, so of course Obama was familiar with Alinsky. Corsi's characterization of Alinsky as "Machiavellian" is equivalent to saying that community organizing is inherently radical.
* * *
Corsi makes sure to emphasize that he has a PhD, by saying so on top of every even-numbered page. But his emphasis begs the reader to question the academic standards that Corsi employs in this book -- alas, those standards are pretty low. In a normal opinion book, non-academic standards are acceptable -- but because Corsi claims his PhD as his primary credential, he then should apply academic standards.
The most important academic standard is to use "primary sources," which means citing original speakers. A "secondary source" means, for example, citing a newspaper article which cites the original speaker. A "tertiary source" means citing an opinion piece based on newspaper articles. At OnTheIssues, we try to use mostly primary sources (speech transcripts; book excerpts; and so on) and sometimes use secondary sources; but we never use tertiary sources unless no other sources are available. OnTheIssues does not claim to live up to academic standards -- but Corsi does, but routinely cites tertiary sources.
For example, on pp. 199-200, Corsi associates Obama with Father Pfegler, whom Corsi labels "a Radical Catholic Priest." The evidence of Pfegler's radicalism is cited from "TheCapitalFaxBlog.com, a well-read Chicago blog." Citing a blog is fine for casual conversation, but not for a PhD-level work. Hence the reader feels misled by Corsi's mixing of academic credentials with non-academic citations. More importantly, the reader wonders why Corsi did not investigate enough to find the original speaker -- and must conclude that at best, Corsi was too rushed to do research, or at worst, that Corsi could not actually locate the original material.
* * *
Overall, this is an important book because the "Swift Boat" attack was so successful. (But few people actually read that book either!) The primary readers of both attacks are the strongest anti-Democratic partisans. The rest of us will hear the details through conservative Talk Radio hosts endlessly -- even after the 2008 election!
-- Jesse Gordon, jesse@OnTheIssues.org, September 2008
Click here for 48 full quotes from Barack Obama in the book The Obama Nation.
OR click on an issue category below for a subset.
Abortion
   Opposed legislation protecting born-alive failed abortions.
   1997: opposed bill preventing partial-birth abortion.
Civil Rights
   Admired repeated acts of "self-creation" by Malcolm X.
Foreign Policy
   Dressed in Africa in traditional garb, not "Muslim attire".
   Global Poverty Act: spend 0.7% of GDP on foreign aid.
Gun Control
   Opposed bill okaying illegal gun use in home invasions.
Health Care
   CDC estimate: a half million would follow Obama's AIDS test.
   Include everyone who wants insurance in national pool.
Homeland Security
   Goal is a world without nuclear weapons.
   A New Beginning: seek world with no nuclear weapons.
Jobs
   Small towns get bitter over long-term joblessness.
Principles & Values
   Father's car crash death may have included alcohol.
   Father had wife in Africa when he met and married Ann Dunham.
   Father left family for Harvard education.
   Father's upbringing was Muslim, although never religious.
   Visited Africa 3 times; 1986, then 1992 & 2006 with Michelle.
   Father had 3 or 4 wives; Barack has at least 5 half-siblings.
   Father came to US on student airlift; JFK funded 2nd airlift.
   Mother named "Stanley Ann" because grandfather wanted a son.
   Many attribute mother's marriages to being anthropologist.
   Lived with grandparents in Hawaii over mother in Indonesia.
   No madrassa, but was introduced to Islam as a child.
   Apocryphal story: race awareness began with skin-bleach ad.
   Nicknamed "Barry the O'Bomber" in prep school basketball.
   OpEd: Racial angst from paternal abandonment, not injustice.
   Would be first president to have extended family abroad.
   Neighbor Bill Ayres admits 1970s violent radicalism.
   OpEd: Distances himself from 1970s radical Bill Ayres.
   Obama worked in same community as Saul Alinsky.
   OpEd: Obama implements Alinsky's ideas of radical change.
   Used community organizer skills as State Senator.
   Handpicked as successor by retiring State Senator.
   1995: Participated in Million Man March.
   Tony Rezko: large contributor & active member of campaigns.
   Headed "Project Vote!" in Chicago in 1990s.
   Ally Tony Rezko indicted for kickbacks from Gov. Blagojevich.
   Tony Rezko helped Obama buy home in prestigious neighborhood.
   Obama's Trinity Church is based on black-liberation theology.
   Moved to & attended church in neighborhood he was organizing.
   Segments of Wright sermons were "caricatures of the church".
   Just words? "I have a dream," Just words?.
   Borrowed "Just Words" speech from Mass. Gov. Deval Patrick.
   Don't take a chance on me; take a chance on your aspirations.
   Borrowed "Yes, we can" slogan from Cesar Chavez 1960s UFW.
   Photographed without hand over heart during national anthem.
   OpEd: Themes of "hope" and "change" has numerous antecedents.
   OpEd: Behind "hope & change" rhetoric lays radical views.
Tax Reform
   Adjust capital gains tax up to where Reagan set it.

Click for quotations from other sources by:
The above quotations are from The Obama Nation
Leftist Politics and the Cult of Personality, by Jerome Corsi.

Related books, debates, and candidates:

LETTER TO WASHINGTON TIMES REGARDING CMC AMOS - REMOVE GEN. AMOS FROM COMMAND

LETTER TO WASHINGTON TIMES REGARDING CMC AMOS - REMOVE GEN. AMOS FROM COMMAND
Posted By: Seawitch [Send E-Mail]
Date: Monday, 12-Aug-2013 02:19:35
 
Letter to Wash/Times Re CMC Amos.
Remove Gen. Amos from command

Legal proceedings for Marines accused of urinating on dead insurgents in Afghanistan have been ongoing for many months. Only recently, however, has the Marine Corps disgorged documents that demonstrate criminal conduct by the commandant of the Marine Corps in attempting to unlawfully influence the outcomes of legal proceedings against these Marines. Documents obtained by attorneys in the pending courts-martial demonstrate that the commandant of the Marine Corps, Gen. James Amos, removed the authority to dispose of the cases from Lt. Gen. Thomas D. Waldhauser, whom he previously had appointed, after Gen. Waldhauser refused Gen. Amos’ demand that the accused Marines be “crushed” and discharged.
Additional evidence shows that senior lawyers on the commandant’s staff engaged in efforts to cover up the commandant’s misbehavior, hide it from defense counsel for accused Marines and publicly and falsely report the reasons Gen. Waldhauser had been removed as convening authority for the cases.
Unlawful command influence has been described as the “mortal enemy of military justice.” It is also a crime under military law. Gen. Amos’ transparent attempt to unlawfully influence pending legal proceedings and interfere with the lawful authority of a subordinate commander calls for swift remedial action, including removal from his current position. It dishonors the service of all Marines to have the Marine Corps’ commandant attempt to unlawfully influence military justice proceedings and use his staff lawyers to cover it up and hide the evidence.

Inasmuch as court-martial for a general officer is problematic, the secretary of defense should take immediate action to demand Gen. Amos’ retirement at the grade of major general. Gen. Amos’ conduct has dishonored the Marine Corps, disgraced the uniform and called into question his fitness for the position he holds. Failure to promptly and forcefully discipline Gen. Amos sends the message that what is intolerable and criminal in military justice — unlawful command influence — is excusable. That is just wrong.
LT. COL. CHARLES W. GITTINS
U.S. Marine Corps (Retired)
Winchester, Va.

LINK:
http://eedition.washingtontimes.com/