A little different
Fuku topic today
I
cannot find the super high res photos of reactors 1 and 2, I found good ones,
but not the ones I remember. So until I find them (they are on backup
somewhere) instead of proving the carbon was blown out of the reactor cores, I
am going to today document and prove that the scenarios at reactors 1,2,and 3
were flatly impossible absent Israel remote administering Fukushima via the
Stuxnet virus, and playing games with the control room readouts to baffle the
Fuku engineers long enough to get away with destroying Fukushima entirely.
Tomorrow's topic will likely be the cleanup of the fuel pellets expelled from
reactor 3, and proof it threw it's fuel everywhere, thus vaporizing the
hydrogen blast lie the rest of the way. Then it will be on to other things Fuku
related, but today, take a look at this:
This diagram shows the placement of the safety release valves at
each of the reactor sites. Though only one valve is shown in this diagram, they
are in fact redundant. This is the valve that is shown right where the pipe
comes out of the side of the reactor, near the top. Reactors 1 and 2 had 11 of
these valves each, according to the reactor engineer I interviewed, and reactor
3 had a ridiculously high safety margin with 17 of these valves installed.
The reactors were
designed to run at 1150 PSI, and the valves release at 1160 PSI unless they get
a command from the controller to stay shut, and if told to stay shut they never
open. Since these valves function automatically unless they are told not to,
I'd like to ask how 39 of them simultaneously failed at Fukushima.
The valve in the
diagram is the first one out of the top of the reactor and is labeled
"safety relief valve". These are redundant, there is more than one
In addition to these valves failing to open, which would have vented all the
pressure from the reactors out the large smokestacks you see in all the
Fukushima pictures in a spectacular fashion unlike anything ever seen in
industry before, (27 gigawatts of energy coming out of two pipes with the
reactors over 3,000 PSI if they had opened at that pressure, which would have
been more than obvious in the Fuku videos) the facility operators were
continuously fed control room readouts which indicated the reactor pressures
were below the level that would cause the valves to automatically open.
Here is the smoking
gun
The engineers knew the pumps were not running, and that no steam was being
diverted from the reactors through the passive backup systems. Despite this,
the pressure readings remained normal. But they knew the reactors needed water
despite what the control room said, and sent people to inject water into the
reactors via a special pipe that allowed external pumps to be hooked up from
outside the containment structures, so like the generators that arrived on time
but were refused by the virus to connect, auxiliary pumps also arrived on time
to force water into the reactors even with everything in the facility disabled
by the virus.
With the pressure readings in the control room being normal, the
people sent to pump water into the reactors soon discovered they could not,
because contrary to what the control room was saying, the pressures in the
reactors were above the 3,000 psi the external pumps could deliver. This proves
sabotage all by itself, because if the mechanical safety release valves were
supposed to let go at 1160 PSI and did not, all the while the control room was
receiving normal pressure readings, something was seriously amiss.
Upon receiving word that the pressures in the reactors were approximately 3
times the normal operating pressure of 1150 PSI, the engineers gave the command
to force all 39 safety release valves to open manually, rather than
automatically, and at all 3 reactor sites this command was ignored by the virus
infected controllers, which did the opposite and kept them shut. So with both
automatic and manual release enabled, NONE of the 39 safety valves opened, and
reactors 1 and 2 exploded. This was clearly outlined in the International
Nuclear Regulatory Commission report (which to this day claims that hydrogen
gas caused the explosions) but I am going to shred even that now -
SINCE THE ONLY WAY
HYDROGEN COULD ENTER THE CONTAINMENT WOULD BE VIA A BROKEN PIPE HOOKED UP AFTER
ONE OF THESE SAFETY VALVES, WHICH WERE THE FIRST THING OUT OF THE REACTOR, AND
THESE SAFETY VALVES NEVER OPENED, THERE IS NO WAY IN HELL ANY HYDROGEN
EVER GOT INTO ANY OF THE CONTAINMENT STRUCTURES AT ALL. It was physically
impossible, hydrogen could only have been an issue if the safety valves had
functioned, which they did not. AND ON TOP OF THAT, EVEN IF all the piping
coming out of the reactors was broken, WHICH IT WAS NOT, nothing would have
leaked into the containments to cause an explosion anyway because the valves
were all forced shut. If there was any break in any pipe it would have dropped
the reactor pressures to ZERO with none of the pumps running as the official
story states, thus allowing easy injection of water from the external pumps
that were never part of normal operation but available and working perfectly.
The high pressures alone proved Fukushima got through the earthquake unscathed
because it took perfectly intact systems to hold back such high pressures.
The
fact that they could not get water into the reactors because the pressures were
too high, all the while NO steam came out of those smoke stacks proves that ALL
the reactors remained perfectly sealed until they exploded, and the only thing
that could cause an explosion with the reactors sealed off, thus not allowing
any hydrogen out, would be a reactor pressure vessel breach at pressures over
3,000 PSI, and THAT would be enough to do the damage we witnessed at reactors 1
and 2.
So, to sum it up - The only way Hydrogen could have gotten out of any of the
reactors is if one or more of the safety valves let it out, and if any one of
those valves had opened enough to let it out there would not have been the
extreme pressures inside the reactors, which prevented external water
injection. This nails Israel's butt to the wall, the disaster at reactors 1 and
2 was STUXNET ALL THE WAY.
Stuxnet is the only way
all the control rooms would have given normal
readouts while everything went kablooey. Such normal readouts that the
engineers sent people to put water in the reactors with external pumps, only to
discover that the pumps could not overcome the 3,000 plus PSI in the reactors
when in no case it should have ever exceeded 1160 PSI. Stuxnet is the only way
39 separate hair trigger safety release valves which were designed to go off
with only a fraction of a single percent over pressure could have failed while
in fully mechanical automatic mode, and then totally failed (all 39 of them) in
forced release mode as well. Reactor pressure vessel breaches are the only way
the containment structures could have been destroyed with all the safety valves
shut, therefore blocking any way for the hydrogen to enter the containment
structures. You cannot have a hydrogen release from inside the reactors, while
having reactor pressures be through the roof because all the valves are jammed
shut,
the two situations cannot coexist
Catch 22, CHECK
MATE.
You can forget talking about how hydrogen could never have destroyed the containments,
when the real issue is the fact that with the safety release valves held shut
by a virus, there is no way any hydrogen got out of the reactors anyway. The
hydrogen explosion story is beyond laughable in more ways than one.
You can thank Arnie Gundersen and the lying ziopress for the silence on this
issue, it's no wonder why the press avoided interviewing real reactor engineers
with regard to this topic, having only their little Arnie as the
"expert".
Why only Arnie? Is he the only one? Other than my
interview of one of the engineers who designed unit 3, the press interviewed
absolutely NO ONE ELSE. See anything fishy with that?
Of course. But with Fukushima and the entire earthquake and tsunami being an
act of war, and that war being waged by Israel, the first casualty is the truth
and there is no way on earth the ziopress would ever let the big secret go.
That would be like trying to get CNN to tell the truth about building 7 on
9/11.
Censorship has
destroyed the original references, but I found a few new ones that prove what
is above.
Since the safety release valves automatically let go at 1160 PSI, a
fraction of a percent over operating pressure, WHY ON EARTH were they remaining
shut at 1.5X operating pressure on March 12, when this nuclear engineer talked
about what was going on out there? He points out that the safety release valve
story was very strange:
Surviving
evidence 1
Another
piece of surviving evidence, though totally messed up now And I'd like to
ask, why can't this be found easily anymore?
Here is a good one talking about the high pressure levels in the
reactors, pressures NOT POSSIBLE if the safety systems were not disabled. high
pressures in the reactors
Since practically
everything regarding not being able to get water into the reactors due to ultra
high presssures prior to the explosions has been censored, tomorrow's gem is
going to be proof of reactor 3's core ejection, thus making the initial cleanup
possible only with remote control and robots, all of which was documented but
is totally expunged from the web except for one reference now. And what
happened to the Fukushima 50? People died of radiation poisoning out there,
WHERE ARE THEIR STORIES? I will post the remote control and robots link now, in
case they kill it overnight. Read it while you still can, WHERE WAS THIS IN THE
ZIOPRESS??!!??
_______________________________________________
I am getting
airtime deleted again, and am now using Starbucks. I don't know what triggered
it this time, but I know how to get even.
I said from the
beginning that I had a lot more info on Fukushima that I never released in the
initial report, because that report was too long as it was. I am releasing that
info and clarifying the Fukushima report NOW.
The "hydrogen
explosions" at Fukushima were not possible.
A few scientific
points that prove it
People
have the misconception that hydrogen can explode all by itself, when in fact it
needs oxygen to combust at all. And during the time period when the blasts
occurred out at Fukushima, the containment structures were all completely
purged of oxygen and had nothing but nitrogen in the reactor containments. It
is not a requirement to be able to purge a nuclear containment structure of all
oxygen leaving only nitrogen and therefore no explosion potential from any fuel
that needs oxygen to combust, but at Fukushima that is exactly how the Japanese
set it up.
Many people are
under the misconception that hydrogen and oxygen were produced inside the
reactors at the same time
That
is not how the reaction works. The entire proposed reason for hydrogen to have
been present is the assumption that the reactors did not have enough water in
them, which allowed the reactor cores to exceed 2000 degrees celsius. If that
happens, the zircon cladding which covers the nuclear fuel in each pellet will
rob the oxygen out of the water molecules in the saturated steam inside the
reactor, and release only the hydrogen. So there is no oxygen buildup at the
same time because it all gets captured by the zircon, and therefore no
explosion potential due to free hydrogen because there is no oxygen released
for the hydrogen to react with.
In addition to this, hard vent stacks were present at Fukushima which were
specifically designed to vent any hydrogen produced. When you add the vent
stacks to the equation, it introduces yet another layer of impossibility to the
hydrogen explosion hoax.
1. There is never any oxygen produced inside ANY reactor of the type out at
Fukushima even during the worst case scenario.
2. Hard vent stacks were in place to vent all hydrogen outside and release
it 500 feet up in the air.
3. All the reactor containments had been nitrogen purged, thus eliminating
entirely ANY hydrogen explosion possibility, even if it was being released in
copious amounts directly into the reactor containments.
4. The reactor containments had solid concrete walls up to 12 feet thick in
some places, which absolutely NO hydrogen explosion even at it's worst
theoretical maximum could possibly do anything to AT ALL, yet they were mostly
atomized to the finest dust at reactor 3, and whatever large pieces were left
were blown to smithereens. To say a little loose gas could do that is the
Hollywood equivalent of the Rambo arrow, where an ounce or two of explosive
material can wipe out an entire enemy force.
Chemical reactions have their limits, and for anyone to have dreamed up
hydrogen destroying ultra robust reactor structures is a foray into burn the witch
ignorance. There is no doubt a Hollywood crew worked on this particular false
flag, where events happened that were leaps of logic even Hollywood would
seldom aspire to.
In reality, reactors 1 and 2 suffered pressure vessel breaches at 3000 PSI
after being pushed to full thermal output with all the safety release valves
closed by the Stuxnet virus, (a fact easily proven but I ignored because the
Fuku report was getting too long anyway) and reactors 3 and 4 were destroyed by
nuclear weapons because reactor 4 could not be destroyed with a virus while it
was mothballed, and reactor 3 had too many additional safety systems in place
to make it easy to kill, even with a virus. The pressure vessel breaches, and
proof of virus sabotage will be tomorrow's topic. And there is absolute proof
of pressure vessel breaches at ultra high pressure in droves at reactors 1 and
2, and that only a virus could have caused it, but I never discussed that
because the real issue was reactors 3 and 4.
This is a portion of the additional information I said I had about Fukushima
right from the beginning but did not discuss because the report was already too
long for mass public consumption. Since my mailboxes are totally censored of
all decent news tips, and the NSA has chosen to destroy the forums and comment
sections everywhere on the web with that new supercomputer at that "data
center" in Utah, the only thing remaining to convey truth is hard set web
sites such as this one, where a comment cannot vanish into nowhere, and what
else is there to talk about when damn near everything else is censored anyway?
And if multiple gigabytes of bandwidth are going to continue to be deleted
from the cell modems, which I can't afford to repeatedly recharge, which prevents
me from getting out onto the web anyway, I will work with the information I
already have and clarify a few points regarding Fukushima and steal a few
minutes here and there from open wifi connections to upload it.
I don't
need airtime AT ALL.
Tomorrow's topic:
Carbon expulsion from the reactor cores at units 1 and 2. Proof of ultra high
PSI pressure vessel breaches, which with the safety systems installed at those
two reactors, would never have been possible absent willful destruction no
matter what the scenario. Huge pressure vessel breaches where the pressure
vessels contain saturated steam at 3000+ PSI absolutely WILL blow through huge
thick concrete walls, to the extent we saw at reactors 1 and 2.
Reactors 1 and 2 had 11 automatic safety valves at each reactor, and even
one of those valves can totally depressurize a reactor. These safety valves
automatically go off at 1,160 PSI unless they are told by a powered command to
stay shut. These were hooked directly up to the hard vent stacks, (the big white
ones in all the photos) which would have vented the reactors (absent willful
sabotage) rather than allowing them to explode and compared to having the
reactors explode, they release virtually no radiation.
IF the situation at Fuku happened as stated in the ziopress, ALL of the hard
vent stacks should have been blowing steam like the gates of hell and beyond
prior to anything happening to the reactors AT ALL. Cumulatively we are talking
about having to release enough steam at a minimum (to match the ziopress
scenario) to dissipate 12 gigawatts of power, and realistically, considering
what happened, enough steam to dissipate 27 gigawatts. The fact no steam was
released AT ALL when Tepco workers could not push water into the reactors
against a head pressure in excess of 2600 PSI when the automatic safety release
happens at 1,160 proves the safety pressure releases were receiving a command
to stay shut from a SABOTAGED Siemens Scada controller, and the only way that
could have been accomplished is with the well documented Israeli owned Stuxnet
virus, delivered by Israeli "security firm" Magna BSP. The fact that
the control room operators even considered it possible to inject water into the
reactors proves they were getting normal pressure readouts when the pressures
were in fact off the charts which made manual water injection impossible, a
fact the engineers would have been aware of absent control room readout
sabotage. That is specifically what Stuxnet is designed to do. That is
tomorrows topic.
Go ahead. Censor all the forums and comment sections around the web,
delete all my incoming e-mails and kill the modems more. I have plenty to write
about and all the evidence is already here, on back up. I'll just snipe open
wifi connections for a few brief moments each day to post what is typed
offline.
Line itemed
Fukushima report to be done
Since I have been banned from receiving meaningful whistleblowing mail, and
the forums and blogs are now almost completely devoid of content since the new
NSA data center went online, I am going to get even with their worst nightmare,
the report that caused all the problems to begin with.
Here is the first
clarification of the Fukushima report
Many
people were not able to read through the entire Fukushima report, let alone
understand it. So many people do not know that even according to the
International Nuclear Regulatory Commission, the generators were never
submerged, and never failed.
That's right, the
generators were NEVER submerged, and NEVER failed
Here
is what really happened -
All of the backup generators located at units 1-4 were inside the turbine
building, which flooded to a depth of 4 feet
at it's lowest level in the
basement which was not enough water to cause trouble for the generators,
which were higher than that, and on top of it, were giant industrial generators
with huge footings that kept them out of any water that did enter the turbine
building.
In addition to this, the fuel tanks were never compromised by the
tsunami. After I clearly pointed out that the generators never got submerged, a
lie was hatched that the tsunami washed the fuel tanks away. And that is a bold
faced lie.
Here is what really
happened
All
of the backup generators for units 1-4 came online after the earthquake, and
before the tsunami arrived, 7 out of 8 mysteriously shut off all by themselves.
The only one that remained running was the final emergency reserve that was
never hooked up to a Stuxnet infected Siemens Scada controller, so it never
received a virus command to shut down. This one generator was enough to
run all the cooling pumps at ALL 4 reactor sites at that section of Fukushima
Diiachi. The big question is then, since it remained running throughout the
entire disaster, why was it not able to run any cooling pumps?
ANSWER: Because despite not being hooked up to the Scada system, the
electrical switch gear (which was also inside and never got flooded) was hooked
up to the SCADA system and with Israel's cute little Stuxnet virus in place
that switch gear refused to transfer power to the plant from the outside feed
lines to the one generator that was still running. Further examination revealed
that outside power was never lost as well, and that all that happened was the
virus also shut down the outside feed. So with 7 out of 8 generators shut down
by the virus, on top of the outside feed being cut, and the one remaining
generator not being allowed to provide power, a lie was hatched that the
tsunami took out the generators, when in fact it did not.
But wait, there's
more!
There
were six units out at Fukushima, not 4 as most people think. Reactors 5 and 6
had their own back up generators which never received ANY water of any sort.
These generators, 7 in total, were perfectly able to be switched on to provide
power to reactors 1-4, and functioned perfectly throughout the entire disaster,
but were never allowed to divert their power to reactors 1-4 because the virus
infected electrical switches were never allowed to divert power from reactors 5
and 6 to reactors 1-4.
And now, here is
where it really gets crazy.
Despite
the lies told about ruined roads leading into Fuku, all were perfectly intact,
and the International Nuclear Regulatory Commission made it a clear point in
their own Fuku report that Tepco successfully brought in emergency backup
diesel generators on flat bed semi trucks, hooked them up to the main power
feed within 8 hours, (a full day before anything went kablooey) and for a
"technical reason" they were denied the ability to feed back up power
to the reactors because the electrical switch gear refused to connect the
cooling pumps (the real technical reason being Magna BSP and the Stuxnet virus)
even after the switch gear was replaced multiple times to clear the
"failures".
And the punch line,
which will be covered more clearly later:
All
of the affected reactors had completely non electrical backup systems which
used steam from the reactors themselves to turn the cooling pumps, but because
the entire system was infected with a virus, all of the valves, which
automatically open to actuate the passive backup system absent a command from
the controller to stay shut, stayed shut and this is what really caused the
disaster. Since it is well documented that Stuxnet is specifically designed to
interfere with the activation of valves and pumps, it's a no brainer what
really caused the Fuku disaster. A little hint - Don't let Israeli
security companies handle ANY security for you, most of them are branches of
the IDF.
If you want to know
what is coming next, I suggest you try to read the Fukushima report in
full, but I know it's a tedious and technical read. These little blurbs I am
going to put up will be a lot easier to understand. And all the links to
everything discussed in these little blurbs are in the Fuku report so don't
look for them here.
I'd
like to throw in here that it was really cool to censor everything being sent
to this web site through the mail, because now the only rational response to
get news is to line item the Fuku report, which could go on ad nauseum because
it is such a huge topic. And with all of it perfectly documented, I'd like to
see what kind of a boost this gives to the zionist image. And if you manage to
kill this web site off worse than you have, I won't shut up anyway.
I
find it curious that the Israelis can nuke at will and none of it makes news,
but proven mushroom clouds and whited out sensors from miles away will be the
downfall of the lying ziopress, you can't stop every Iphone, and if you do,
what about Motorola? The fact that you manage to keep the truth about this out
of your ziopress only lends creedence to the Fukushima report, if you can sit
straight faced and mute with a mushroom cloud on the horizon, WHAT ELSE can you
bury under a lie of silence?
http://www.jimstonefreelance.com/
