Operation of every single claim in a nutshell
In shipping language, the chartered vessel (United States) took on cargo (the
people), mortgaged that cargo to the hilt to pay for the voyage (used the
credit of the people), then dumped that cargo (the people) over the railing and
into the seas (commerce) to collect on the insurance (social security). Then,
came back to the point of dumping for a salvage operation….(admiralty /
maritime lien)
First, one is “welcomed” into a foreign jurisdiction by the "host nation"
of whom, though its "occupying army", extended its hospitality to a
foreigner upon registration of the birth event and, per the custom of the host
nation, provided a vessel (NAME) whose cargo is destined for the Treasury and
an indemnity receipt guaranteeing care and maintenance of the vessel by the
host nation in order “his burden be light”. (Read Law of Nations Book II
Section 99 and on for the ramifications of this action)
Until, that is, the host nation decided to grant an entrance and extend hospitality
for the purpose of drawing foreigners into a snare. For once the snare was
engaged, one’s duty as a foreigner is now towards defense of the host nation
against pirates or robbers, against the ravages of an inundation, or the
devastations of fire, for how can one pretend to live under the protection of a
state, to participate in a variety of advantages that it affords, and yet make
no exertion for its defense, but remain an unconcerned spectator of the dangers
to which the citizens are exposed?
Now, the same foreigner is
shanghaied at birth into that foreign jurisdiction (origination to
image-nation), conscripted into citizenship (United States or whatever
“nation”) as one can only become a Citizen “and not otherwise” via 2 Stat 153,
given a “christened vessel” (NAME), then sent to battle across the seas
(capitalism: war-shipper of a re-legion), and left for dead (collateral damage
and casualty of war). (See Law of Nations Book III Section 15 for the
ramifications of this action)
Then a “presumption of death” exists because the “infant” (foreigner) is
“missing from beyond the seas” under International Maritime Law via Cestui Que
Vie Acts 1540, 1666, and 1707. Now comes the “enforcement of a maritime lien”
under “Admiralty Law” ... the IRS or any maritime lien is ONLY VAILD if one is
“dead” (dead have no power over the living)
26
USC 6903
“(a) Rights and obligations of fiduciary
Upon notice to the Secretary that
any person is acting for another person in a fiduciary capacity, such fiduciary
shall assume the powers, rights, duties, and privileges of such other person in
respect of a tax imposed by this title…” (Form 56)
(d) Definition of fiduciary. The
term “fiduciary” is defined in section 7701(a)(6) to mean a guardian, trustee,
executor, administrator, receiver, conservator, or any person acting in any
fiduciary capacity for any person.
26
USC 1040 – Transfers of “real property”
(issuance of securities under UCC 8-308 as the “appropriate person” is the
“accommodation party”)
(a) executor of estate (Name)
(resident) you are master of “your” dominion, correct?
(b) trustee of a trust (any portion of which is included in the gross estate of
the decedent) (NAME) (14th Amendment Citizen) you are here to
fulfill divine providence and self-determination (God’s will) for the benefit
of all, thus are trustee.
IRS manual 21.7.13.3.2.2
- An infant is the decedent of an estate or grantor, owner or trustor of
a trust, guardianship, receivership or custodianship that has yet to receive an
SSN.
How can one be an executor of an estate of a decedent when the SSN has been
issued?
Exactly what estate of what decedent
is one “administrating”?
26
USC 2032A
(a) (1)(A) decedent was a citizen/resident of the United States to time of
death
(a)(1)(B) an “election” made on
behalf of the executor
(d) election : agreement (remember “accommodation party”….this is where you
come in)
(2) The agreement referred to in
this paragraph is a written agreement signed by each person in being who has an
interest. (could be anything from a
court case to a utility bill)
Now check out 26 USC 674 and Treas. Reg. § 1.674(b)... “the back
door”
26
USC 2001
(a) imposes tax on the decedents
estate for the transfer
26
USC 2002
executor of estate liable for the
tax
So there is a claim in a nutshell.
If one does not provide “proof of life” (infant still using the estate and
trust) then the one before the court/corporation is presumed to be an “executor”
of a decedent’s estate and trustee of the “citizen trust”. The “claim” is
nothing more than a ruse to get one to be an accommodating party via UCC 3-419
for the agreement under 2032A(d)(2) for one is presumed to be an executor of a
decedent’s estate and the 14th amendment citizen. NAME, is just a
trust ANYONE can operate under 26 USC 674 and Treas. Reg. § 1.674(b), but you
are trustee as the “presumed citizen” and thus liable under 26 USC 1040(b) for
the tax imposed under 26 USC 2001(a) via 26 USC 2002 as if one were executor.
Now this is also the basis for the operation of the “exemption”, so do not go
out and try to destroy this, you will not succeed, “they” will not allow it ….
Once “proof of life” has been established, NAME now is the “security entitlement
holder” and NAME now has whatever credit it needs as the IRS and all these
other corporations are now bound to service the securities account (SS#) under
UCC 8 as “securities intermediary” and usufructuary.
So, in reality "they" are actively engaged in infanticide and
genocide in violation of international law and agreements under the Law of
Nations and Lieber Code (Presidential Admiralty Law) for the purposes of
accessing the estates of presumed decedents and while these apparent acts of
genocide and infanticide may only be on paper, the results of these shenanigans
crosses and carries over into the real world and real people suffer because of
it each and every time one of their agents come to the door and identifies one
through both name and number because one is the infant, now age of majority.
...committing all the oldest sins in
all the newest ways
Now ask one of these guys something
like:
Do I have a name? Do I have a SS number? Are you aware of IRS manual 21.7.13.3.2.2? Then why am I being held liable as the
executor of a decedent’s estate and as trustee of the resulting trust when it
appears the infant has a SS number? Would you like production of the footprints
of the infant to verify and validate this interest?
The insanity has to stop.
Now, before you guys got out and
start running these guys down in the streets, one must also remember, this is
also the operation of a peace treaty under Article 2 of the Lieber Code thru
Article 43 of the Hague (restoration of public order and safety) of which the 1st
essential task is to ensure the inhabitants can live their day to day lives, 2nd
essential task is to establish an agreement which maximizes the benefits of
both inhabitants and occupying army, and, in keeping with the provision of
Article 2 of the Lieber Code that the occupying army remain as a condition of
the peace, the 3rd essential task is that government administrates
the agreement of which is laid out in Article 31 and 38 of the Lieber Code and
Article 55 of the Hague, of which the occupying army is administrator and
usufructuary of all public buildings, real estate, agricultural estates, etc…
and must administrate them in accordance with the rules of usufruct. The “live
birth certificate” is an “indemnity receipt” issued to the “spoliated owner”.
So, when these guys approach you and identify you by both name and number,
whatever “lien right” they think they have has just been invalidated by the
very fact the name and number was used to identify you. The infant now has a SS
number and is no longer a decedent, thus no lien, trusteeship, or executorship
to enforce and it is actually a breach of the International Peace Agreement
between the “living” and the “dead”.
So, there you have it … the presumption
of death is the only thing wrong with “the system” but since it all operates on
paper and translates into the real world with real ramifications, then that is
a big problem. But a problem we can fix literally overnight.
Just have to accept one has a “NAME” and one has a “NUMBER” but owns neither,
then since both NAME and NUMBER have vested within the one, the estate also
re-vests within the one as the infant is no longer dead or “missing from beyond
the seas”, which automatically “invalidates all maritime liens” as those are just
“salvage rights”, and is “of age of majority” and now you operate in pure
equity and they are now the usufruct and you are the “naked owner” with
disposal rights over all of the estate of the Earth, just like the peace treaty
demands.
Just be a good steward.
