MORE ON THE FEDERAL RESERVE ACT

http://stormthunder.com/federal-reserve-act/#axzz2GxB6JXkL

MORE ON THE FEDERAL RESERVE ACT 

StormThunder

When you hear thunder, the storm is coming

Tax Exemption: http://stormthunder.com/federal-reserve-act/#ixzz2Gy1MCQQs
 
Under Creative Commons License: Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives

Federal Reserve Act

The first thing you need to know is it is within your power to stop the continual accumulation of our national debt.

You do not need to “petition congress” or “wait for the next election” and hope things change, because they won’t. Sadly, it doesn’t matter who gets elected.  Republican or Democrat, they are all on the same team with the same master.  The Federal Reserve.

We can get mad, wave signs and banners in the streets, even cry for revolution… It won’t change a thing.

It’s difficult to discuss this subject without sounding like a “conspiracy theorist”. In fact it’s not a theory, and everything I’m going to point out is actually in US Law. Starting with the Federal Reserve Act. It is in fact within the power of congress to repeal the Federal Reserve Act, but they will never do it.

One only has to look at how Ron Paul was mocked and marginalized during his presidential run to get an understanding of how embedded the Federal Reserve is in our political system. It is not a “wild conspiracy” and there is no greater evidence of that than the current events we see today.

So how does this work? There are two types of currency in circulation. US Notes, and Federal Reserve Notes.

Lawful Money = United States Notes;  Not “Federal Reserve Notes”

Title 12 USC §411 :

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/uscode12/usc_sec_12_00000411—-000-.html

Read:

“Federal reserve notes, to be issued at the discretion of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System for the purpose of making advances to Federal reserve banks through the Federal reserve agents as hereinafter set forth and for no other purpose, are authorized. The said notes shall be obligations of the United States and shall be receivable by all national and member banks and Federal reserve banks and for all taxes, customs, and other public dues.They shall be redeemed in lawful money on demand at the Treasury Department of the United States, in the city of Washington, District of Columbia, or at any Federal Reserve bank. “
(emphasis mine)

This proves that “Lawful Money” and “Legal Tender” are not the same.

All that is required is a restricted endorsement on the back of any check to the effect of:

Redeemed in Lawful money
Pursuant to Title 12 USC §411
True name dba Legal name

I have a red ink stamp. Your true name is your first and middle, your “legal name” is “FIRST LAST”. Look at your drivers license. Wonder why your name is in ALL CAPS? Same on your birth certificate. Same on any notice from a court. That’s your legal name, a trust formed by the government in order to do business with you and on you.

Make copies of all your checks (front and back) with your restricted endorsement. Keep them on file, or even better, file them in a case jacket at your nearest district court. This is what all the IRS will be required to see. Lawful money is not taxable income. You have not endorsed private credit, you have not bonded your substance to the contract with the Federal Reserve.

Those who demand lawful money rather than engage in signature endorsed contract with the FED, in their own right and by the operation of law found at §16 of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 now codified at Title 12 U.S.C. §411 which is binding law upon the IRS, and any other United States claiming entity, to accept and recognize the non-taxable nature of lawful money of exchange.

That makes the bank unable to fractionally lend against your signature which serves as bond against the future interest and party to the national debt. This is what essentially reduces the people of the the United States to chattel.

When you sign or “endorse” your check you are bonding your substance behind fractional lending or “elastic currency”.  ONLY THEN is the elastic currency “as good as” Lawful Money.  But it is not Lawful Money.

You are “opting out” of the federal reserve system. The United States currently has 300 Million dollars of US notes in reserve. The stopped printing them because obviously they don’t want anyone using them.

You’ll remember what they look like. Take out a dollar bill, at the top on the “face” you’ll see “Federal Reserve Note” As clearly seen at the top of this page.

US Notes look almost the same, but the serial numbers are in red instead of green, the seal is in red, and the top says:  “United States Note”.  US Notes are the only currency that is recognized as “Lawful Money”, not just “legal tender”. (Fed Notes)

This law remains in full force and effect today. There is a video (long but worth it) DETAILING it here:

http://stormthunder.com

This is why “Constitutional” arguments cannot be brought. It is contract law. Every one of us has agreed by signature.

Our government was hijacked by a group of international bankers in 1913 that understood this.

The Federal Reserve is a private corporation. Corporations have owners. The government of the United States borrows it’s own money, from this private corporation, pay interest on it, and collects that interest through it’s (the Federal Reserve) arm the I.R.S. The national debt is nothing more than the interest owed on the loans our government has received from this corporation for it’s own money.

To put it plainly and in the interest of brevity, If the Fed ended tomorrow, our debt would be gone. That’s oversimplified, yes but it’s not complicated.

Proof: There is only one President in history that has ever paid off the national debt. Andrew Jackson. How did he do it? He took back control of our own currency. He stopped the bank. Debt stopped accumulating, and we were able to pay all outstanding debts before his term ended. Conspiracy “wako”? No. It has happened before. >Look it up.

That wiki article is just tip of the iceberg but worth pointing out is the mention of the use of class warfare and it’s central theme in the discussion:

“The classic statement by Arthur Schlesinger was that the partisan politics during the Jacksonian period was grounded in class conflict. Viewed through the lens of party elite discourse, Schlesinger saw inter-party conflict as a clash between wealthy Whigs and working class Democrats”(Grynaviski).

President Andrew Jackson strongly opposed the renewal of its charter, and built his platform for the election of 1832 around doing away with the Second Bank of the United States. Jackson’s political target was Nicholas Biddle, financier, politician, and president of the Bank of the United States.

Apart from a general hostility to banking and the belief that specie (gold and/or silver) was the only true money, Jackson’s reasons for opposing the renewal of the charter revolved around his belief that bestowing power and responsibility upon a single bank was the cause of inflation and other perceived evils.

“Other perceived evils” indeed. Jackson understood as did many others that with this kind of fiat currency in place and not under the control of the United States we would soon become a nation of slaves to a debt that we could never repay.

Interesting that Wikipedia mentions that he was a slave owner in the first paragraph, but it isn’t until the bottom of the page that there is a small blurb that he was the first and only President to ever pay off the national debt. Immediately followed by “However, this accomplishment was short lived. A severe depression from 1837 to 1844 caused a tenfold increase in national debt within its first year.”

I could go into how the war of 1812 and the depression following Jackson’s term were both caused directly by the international bankers to renew there charter in the first case, and re institute their charter in the second, but that is not the focus of this discussion. You are encouraged to read up on it yourself. As are you encouraged to read up on all of this yourself.

What I’m giving you is not conjecture. There are many that are doing this now, and have been for some 2 years. Many of the “tax arguments” in existence today have focused on the wrong things. “Constitutionality” and “Supreme Court” case law, it’s been right there in the Act the whole time.

Make no mistake, as the video on the homepage points out, it’s all about the exact “verbiage” that you use. If you get it wrong, you are in violation of your agreement with the Fed. By contract you have agreed to bond your substance for their credit. That’s what it means when they have said “income tax is voluntary”.

Did your parents ever explain why you are supposed to endorse the backs of your checks? I betting no. It’s something we are simply conditioned to do. We are never taught that our signatures are “worth” something.

The San Antonio Theater Shooting the National Media Ignored

By Bob Adelmann
New American
January3, 2012

At approximately 9:25 p.m. on Sunday night, December 16, just two days after the horrific shootings in Newtown, Connecticut, Jesus Manuel Garcia, age 19, entered the China Garden restaurant across the mall from the Santikos Mayan Palace 14 theater complex in San Antonio, Texas, looking for his ex-girlfriend.

Angered that she had just broken up with him, he sent her a text message saying that he planned to go to the restaurant where she worked and “shoot somebody.”

Before she could warn patrons at the restaurant Garcia entered and started shooting.
One bullet slightly wounded one patron while others scattered out the exit doors and headed for the safety of the theater lobby across the mall. Garcia chased them and continued shooting.
This got the attention of an armed off-duty law-enforcement officer who was working at the theater, Bexar County sheriff’s Sgt. Lisa Castellano, who chased Garcia to the back of the theater where he ducked into the men’s room.
When he emerged, Castellano shot him four times which immediately and effectively ended the threat. Garcia was handcuffed with the help of another off-duty officer and taken to the hospital where he was listed in stable condition.

He was charged with attempted capital murder of a police officer and aggravated assault with a deadly weapon, and his bail was set at $1 million.

In reporting the incident, local news recalled the Aurora, Colorado, theater attack last July. Hollie O’Connor, who covered the story for mysanantonio.com, said:

“The shooting immediately sparked fears of a mass slaying like the one in July that killed 12 people and injured 58 at a movie theater in Aurora, Colorado.” She included a quote from one Cassandra Castillo, the mother of the theater’s projectionist, who was worried about her son’s safety in the incident. Said Castillo, “It brings back memories of the other theater shooting and the elementary school shooting. You think only the worst.”

But the national media ignored this story, even though the shooting occurred just two days after the Newtown shooting. It wasn’t just a case that (thankfully) no one was killed in the San Antonio incident.

Very likely, no one was killed because of the timely intervention of the armed off-duty officer. If the media were honestly looking for solutions to gun violence, they should have jumped on the San Antonio to show the difference a good person with a gun can make.

But they didn’t, apparently because it does not fit the narrative that the mainstream media promote — that is, that guns cause violence rather than prevent it.

In their coverage of the Aurora theater tragedy, the media made much of the weaponry used by James Holmes and his ability to purchase his weapons and his body armor and ammunition online without difficulty. The coverage pointed to the horrors of Holmes’ “assault” weapons as the cause of the tragedy while ignoring that the theater was a “gun-free zone.”

No suggestion was ever made that the gun-free zone mandated by the theater made it an attractive target for Holmes because he knew he would meet no resistance.

Though they gave the Aurora theater shooting mega-publicity and spun it in a way that meshed with their anti-gun agenda, the major media almost completely ignored another Aurora shooting that occurred last April.

In the little-reported shooting, 29-year-old Kiarron Parker, after killing his first victim outside an Aurora church, immediately encountered armed resistance from a churchgoer who killed him before he could take any more innocent lives.
The San Antonio theater shooting was neutralized by armed resistance before anyone was killed. The off-duty officer recognized the threat and was trained to meet it and she did — so successfully in fact that the city gave her a medal for her actions.

When Wayne LaPierre, executive director of the National Rifle Association, suggested that potential threats be met with armed resistance in schools so that future massacres can be avoided, the media just scoffed, quoting various gun-control advocates that the last thing needed in schools is more guns.

It widely disseminated President Obama’s comment that he is “skeptical that the only answer is putting more guns in schools … that that somehow is going to solve our problem.”

The April Aurora church shooting and the recent San Antonio theater shooting should be more than enough to persuade all but the most hardened and determined enemies of the Second Amendment that the best thing is for more people to be armed and enabled to resist threats like these, rather than fewer. But the media aren’t listening.
Those incidents don’t fit the narrative.
http://theintelhub.com/2013/01/03/the-san-antonio-theater-shooting-the-national-media-ignored/

Interview with Heather with The One People's Public Trust - Must Listen!

THE ONE PEOPLE'S PUBLIC TRUST: A Conversation With Trustee Heather Tucci-Jarraf Audio -  2 1/2 hours.  AWESOME.   http://americankabuki.blogspot.com/2013/01/the-one-peoples-public-trust.html    (Scoll down for the audio) Heather is part of a team that in 2008 started on a journey to free everyone on the planet from slavery – to take back what belongs to us - our gov’ts and the wealth of the planet that was stolen from us.  Using the UCC (uniform commercial code), the process to free us is complete, and the public announcement was made on Christmas Day, 12-25-12.  She’ll tell you that things are getting cleaned up behind the scenes, why bankers, gov't officials (and some entire gov’ts worldwide), etc. have been resigning and/or have been arrested, and how the money (collateral accounts, prosperity funds, etc.) have become unbound so they can now be released.  Heather states that new gov'ts by the people will be put in place worldwide.  Using this powerful tool, the UCC , We The People Foreclosed on all the slavery systems, the Corporation UNITED STATES, UN, IMF, HAGUE, BIS, and all the corporate entities functioning under the guise of gov't.  Heather talks about how we even took back all the gold and silver that belongs to The People.  (This is why we saw pictures of the Queen of England and others checking their gold vaults last month, and why so much gold has recently been moved around the world.)  -------------------------- To access the UCC filings that did it, and to see all the documents, go here: http://www.peoplestrust1776.org/ Then go to "UCC Filings" at the top of the page and choose "download all" -------------------------- After the One People’s Public Trust made their public announcement on Dec 25, Heather received many emails asking her questions about the documents.  She answered a lot of them online.  If you want to read the questions and Heather’s answers, you can see them here: http://americankabuki.blogspot.com/2012/12/official-announcement-from-one-peoples.html and http://americankabuki.blogspot.com/2012/12/the-one-peoples-public-trust-q-a.html and http://americankabuki.blogspot.com/2012/12/the-one-peoples-public-trust.html and http://americankabuki.blogspot.com/2012/12/the-one-peoples-public-trust-ucc-and.html 2013 is going to be a great year!

Meet Al Jazeera’s Holocaust-Denying Televangelist…Is This What We Can Expect on the New Current TV?

• Posted on January 3, 2013 at 7:30pm by Tiffany Gabbay

By now many have heard about Al Jazera’s recent acquisition of Current TV, Al Gore’s floundering television network that has, since its inception in 2005, displayed not only abysmal ratings but also blatant anti-Israel and anti-U.S. bias.

Ironically, TheBlaze sought to purchase Current, but was rebuffed by its executives who stated that they could not in good conscience sell out to a network whose point of view was not aligned with theirs. Thus, the only reasonable step for Gore and company was to seal a multi-million dollar deal with Al Jazeera, because, according to Current co-founder Joel Hyatt, the Qatar-based network “was founded with the same goals we had for Current.”

So what, exactly, are those shared goals and values? And what might a revamped Al Jazeera-led lineup at the new (and likely not so improved) Current TV look like?
A glimpse at Al Jazeera’s highest-rated program to date might give us an inkling into what lies ahead and it is cringe-inducing (though not surprising) to say the least.
Current: Meet Muslim Brotherhood spiritual sherpa and Al Jazeera’s top performing Islamic televangelist Youssef al-Qaradawi, best known for repeatedly twisting the Holocaust into a mold that suits his Islamic agenda and for declaring that his greatest hope is simply to live long enough to “shoot dead Allah’s enemies, the Jews.” The prolific imam has also issued hundreds of fatwas on everything from homosexuality to music to the role of female suicide bombers in their noble pursuit of jihad.
In light of Hyatt’s disturbing statement concerning his network’s shared goals with Al Jazeera, it is perhaps prudent to review the latter’s star talent, who has graced the homes of some 60 million viewers for the past 15 years with his weekly program ”Shariah and Life.”

Qaradawi’s Anti-Semitism

Yussuf al-Qawadari. Photo source: AFP

Returning to Qaradawi’s long-harbored desire to live long enough so that Allah might grant him the singular opportunity of personally slaying Jewish people, the imam stated during a televised speech:
“I’d like to say that the only thing I hope for is that as my life approaches its end, Allah will give me an opportunity to go to the land of Jihad and resistance, even if in a wheelchair. I will shoot Allah’s enemies, the Jews, and they will throw a bomb at me, and thus, I will seal my life with martyrdom. Praise be to Allah, Lord of the Worlds. Allah’s mercy and blessings upon you.”
According to Qaradawi, for their inherent ”evil,” Allah imposed upon the Jews a series of “punishments,” the last one led by Adolf Hitler “by means of all the things he did to them.”
“He [Hitler] managed to put them in their place.”
“This [the Holocaust] was divine punishment for them. Allah willing, the next time will be at the hand of the believers,” Qaradawi stated proudly during a televised broadcast in 2009.
The imam openly praised the fuhrer for teaching the Jews “a divine lesson” while in the same breath minimizing the Holocaust by saying that the Jewish people have “exaggerated the issue.”
So, the imam uses the Shoah in a way that suits him, in a way that furthers his agenda, while at the same time denying the true extent of the carnage lest he engender any “undue” sympathy for the Jewish people.

Anti-Semitic diatribes such as the one featured above are just a small taste of what Qaradawi has offered on his weekly Sunday broadcasts.
So who is Qaradawi?
According to lore, Qaradawi is no ordinary imam or mufti, having allegedly memorized the entire Quran by age 10. He was born in Egypt in 1926, graduated from Al Azhar University in Cairo and by 1942 joined the Muslim Brotherhood, the grandfather of all major militant Islamic groups including Hamas, Hezbollah and al Qaeda.
The imam was arrested several times for the activities he carried out while with the Brotherhood and subsequently fled to Qatar in 1961, where he still resides. He has become the preeminent Muslim (or at least Sunni) “authority” on all things Islam, covering a range of topics from “mother’s milk banks” to the right of every Palestinian woman to offer herself up as a suicide-bombing martyr.

Qaradawi and the Muslim Brotherhood
Qaradawi’s ties to the Muslim Brotherhood stem back to his days as a student at Al-Azhar University in Cairo, where he met Brotherhood-founder (and not coincidentally, Hitler admirer) Hassan al-Banna. Banna was perhaps the first to offer Qaradawi a glimpse into alternative views on the handling of societies ills and “perversions.”
Despite living in exile in Qatar — something that is more than likely to change now that his progeny,

Mohammed Morsi Photo credit: AP

Mohammed Morsi is at the helm in Egypt — Qaradawi has the Brotherhood leader’s ear, acting as his key spiritual adviser. While the imam turned down an official position with the Brotherhood, allegedly because he felt his true calling was to evangelize Islam, he still greatly influences the grandfather of all jihadist groups to this day, and in no small way.
Consider that as recently as 2010 Morsi viciously referred to Israeli Jews as “blood-suckers” and ”descendants of apes and pigs,” invoking age-old anti-Semitic slurs. Here, we see Hitler’s influence via al Banna and later, Qaradawi, weaving its web of hate and vitriol over today’s Islamic leaders.
Morsi called on Muslims “outside Palestine” to “support the resistance fighters and besiege the Zionist wherever they are.”
“None of the Arab or Muslim peoples and regimes should have dealings with them,” the Egyptian president went on to state. “Pressure should be exerted upon them. They must not be given any opportunity, and must not stand on any Arab or Islamic land. They must be driven out of our countries.”
So how does Qaradawi’s ties to the Muslim Brotherhood relate to Al Jazeera and now by default, Current TV? According to David Reaboi, vice president for strategic communications at the Center for Security Policy, both network’s programing have shown some rather specific parallels concerning the Muslim Brotherhood from as early as the onset of the Arab Spring. In a statement to TheBlaze, Reaboi, noted that both Current and Al Jazeera, “presented the Muslim Brotherhood’s takeover in Egypt as a democratic revolution.”
“Both networks pushed provably false narratives about the future of Egypt’s ‘democracy,’ it’s ideological makeup, and demonized those that correctly assessed the situation,” he continued.
“Qaradawi’s role in mobilizing public and nation-state support for the Islamic ascendancy, from Tunisia through Egypt, Libya, Syria and beyond, cannot be overstated. When Qaradawi declared Gadhafi and Assad ‘unIslamic,’ it was not just his estimated 60 million viewers that got the message.”
Reaboi added that Qaradawi’s fatwa indeed helped inform the Obama administration in its calculation about views from the “Arab Street” on such issues. Thus, the imam’s influence is indeed far-reaching and has the power to effect change in a negative way.

Fatwa du jour
Qaradawi has issued hundreds of fatwas, both on his own and as head of the International Union of Muslim Scholars (IUMS). The consummate forward-thinker, the 86-year-old cedes that a women may even remove her hijab, or head-covering, whilst engaged in a martyrdom exercise as jihad is considered the greatest gift of all to Allah.
“Even when necessary, she may take off her hijab in order to carry out the operation, for she is going to die in the cause of Allah and not to show off her beauty or uncover her hair,” the imam declared in a 2004 interview that originally appeared on his websites IslamOnline.net and Qaradawi.net.
“I don’t see any problem in her taking off the hijab in this case. To conclude, I think the committed Muslim women in Palestine have the right to participate and have their own role in jihad and to attain martyrdom.”
Qaradawi has also issued a controversial fatwa, or legal ruling, on homosexuality, maintaining that there is merit in some Muslim jurists’ opinion that those engaged in such an “abominable practice” be put to death.
“While such punishments may seem cruel, they have been suggested to maintain the purity of the Islamic society and to keep it clean of perverted elements,” he stated plainly.

Pope Benedict XVI Photo credit: Getty

Through his myriad fatwas, sermons, speeches and interviews, Qaradawi, who has been banned from entering the U.S. since 1999, has revealed the face of evil in no uncertain terms. He is the catalyst behind the violent “days of rage” protests against Danish cartoons of the Prophet Muhammad and accused Pope Benedict XVI of “fitna” (Arabic for sedition), which, for Islamists, is not even a veiled call to wage jihad on the Papacy.
Through the IUMS, Qaradawi called on the Pope to apologize for the Christian Crusades and for his 2006 lecture at the University of Regensburg in which he quoted a 14th century Byzantine emperor critical of the Ottoman-led holy war on Constantinople.
“Show me just what Muhammad brought that was new and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached,” the Pope recited during his now famed speech.

This, of course, was not taken lightly by Qaradawi and his sycophants at the IUMS. The Pope’s comments were characterized as “false accusations about Islam and its magnificent Messenger” and he was promptly accused of sedition.

Among his other fatwas du jour, Qaradawi has prohibited Sudanese Muslims from joining their Christian counterparts in efforts to break from the brutal Sharia-led Khartoum regime, and he has emphatically called on the world’s Muslims — even in America — to “prosecute” those who dare slander Islam, particularly the Prophet Muhammed. The imam is especially preoccupied with Coptic Christians, along with the creators of the low-budget YouTube video “Innocence of Muslims” and Quran-burning Pastor Terry Jones.
“The Union calls on Muslims in America and throughout the world to take action and make claims against all those responsible and who contributed in the production of this work [Youtube video], and to immediately start legal action to prosecute all those who offend Islam, because such an ugly deed should never be allowed under the banner of freedom of expression, but should be considered a violation of the rights of Muslims and an attack on Islamic symbols and holy sites,” a IUMS statement read.
The imam has also called on the Organisation of Islamic Conference, a 56 (57 if one counts the Palestinian Authority) Islamic member-country body that sets practices for the “ummah” or entire Muslim community, to “adopt lawsuits” against anyone who slanders the prophet, wherever in the world he or she may live.
Al Jazeera’s veteran televangelist has waged similar crusades on music, dancing, mother’s milk and just about anything under the sun that he believes sharia-law should address. Islamic scholar Dr. Andrew Bostom provided TheBlaze with a small cross-section of additional positions held by the rabidly anti-Semitic imam:

• That Muslims emulate their prophet Muhammad as a model for violent, expansionist jihad, which includes the sanctioning of so-called jihad “martyrdom operations”
• The re-creation of a formal transnational United Islamic State (Islamic Caliphate)
• The jihad conquests of Europe and the Americas
• Universal application of the sharia, including Islamic blasphemy law and hudud (Islamic term for sharia-driven punishments). This includes executing so-called “apostates.”
• Homicide “martyrdom” bombings of all Israeli Jews, including non-combatants, and subsequently, invoking Hitler and expanding the circle of hatred, a call for jihad-genocide of all Jews

Qaradawi, who also serves as president of the European Council for Fatwa and Research, has penned more than a 120 books and doctrines in addition to his countless fatwas, making his website and indeed, weekly Al Jazeera program, a kind of “one-stop-shop” for Muslims seeking dogma that will support their respective crusades.

The new Current TV

For over a decade, those who’ve a radar for media bias have locked their sights on Al Jazeera for the network’s numerous journalistic infractions, particularly when it comes to its flagrant anti-Israel, anti-Western bent. But such bias is to be expected from a news outlet that was suspiciously first to air Osama bin Laden’s 9/11 video in which he praised and explained the attacks that claimed the lives of 3,000 innocent people.
Al Jazeera never explained how or where it obtained the bin Laden video and refused to share information that might have led to the al Qaeda mastermind’s capture. David Horowitz’s Discover the Networks website noted that Al Jazeera refused to stop airing the tape despite U.S. concerns that the footage might have contained coded messages signaling to other al Qaeda operatives.
Al Jazeera has also perpetuated various blood libels, including the conspiracy theory that Jews in America had been forewarned of the impending 9-11 attacks and did naught to stop it. The network even brought on former Ku Klux Klan and American Nazi Party leader David Duke as an “expert” on how the Mossad knew of the 9/11 attack plan well in advance and had warned Jews to evacuate the World Trade Center before it was too late. When a Swedish news outlet published the conspiracy theory that Israeli soldiers killed Palestinians, including children, to harvest their organs, Al Jazeera published it as fact. The list goes on.
While it is no secret that Current TV has thus far operated from the left-field of the political spectrum, how can its executives, including Al Gore, a man who once ran for president of the United States, truly find their interests aligned with a network that props up a rabid anti-Semite who condones suicide bombings and calls for the execution of gays and lesbians, and has, through even its more “mainstream” broadcasts, propagated blood libel? Not exactly progressive thinking by anyone’s standards.
Despite Current’s consistently low ratings, with this acquisition, Al Jazeera will now reach 40 million U.S. homes, a reported 9-fold increase in its current American-reach. By the network’s own admission, Al Jazeera will “significantly expand its distribution footprint in the U.S.”
As Islamists seek to gain entry into U.S. life, they’ve been bestowed a brand new vehicle with which to spread their anti-Israel, anti-Western message, and all with the blessing of an American news outlet.


The following is a video featuring one Qaradawi’s anti-Semitic speeches. The segment that follows is of the imam’s al Jazeera program, “Sharia and Life”:

Up To Their Necks In Criminal Activity While They TRY to "DISARM PRIVATE CITIZENS"

The Rumor Mill News Reading Room 

Up To Their Necks In Criminal Activity While They TRY to "DISARM PRIVATE CITIZENS"

Posted By: Lion [Send E-Mail]
Date: Friday, 4-Jan-2013 11:34:48

--------------------- "Big Offense Corporations, who make up the military/industrial/media/banking/governments predatory alliance, are encouraged to produce and sell weapons of mass destruction for profit. Fascist dictatorship governments (NATOUNUS) utilize the weapons they purchased from the offense corporations for killing, and enslaving humanity. Predatory traitors of humanity in the Corporate Media, then try to convince the world that it is "the people causing the problem" - when the people of the world are only trying to defend themselves against genocidal activities of the predators in the Offensive Corporations of the military/industrial/banking/media/governments predatory alliance." It is insane that the psychopathic predators who operate within the military/industrial/banking/media/governments predatory alliance are allowed to call the shots for the rest of humanity. I understand there is plenty of room on the planet Jupiter for them to practice their insanity. ---------------------- Geneva Conference 1932-1934 The campaign for disarmament that took place between the two World Wars was one of the most substantial international non-governmental campaigns ever to have been undertaken. It mobilized organizations that claimed a combined membership as high as half of the population of the world at the time. The Women's International League for Peace and Freedom (WILPF) grew out of the Congress of Women, a 1915 gathering of 1,300 women to protest World War I. The women, who had come from all parts of Europe to work for peace, crafted twenty resolutions in an attempt to bring warring nations to the peace table and end the war. They worked avidly for disarmament, with the active, public support of Eleanor Roosevelt, who often spoke at WILPF conferences and at other organizations in support of peace. In 1932, working with its Nobel Peace Prize- winning president, Jane Addams, WILPF members collected six million signatures for the World Disarmament Petition and delivered them to the World Disarmament Conference in Geneva. Peace groups insisted that the US Congress observe the limits on naval armaments established by agreements negotiated at various international conferences. Such demands began before World War I, and naval treaties were concluded at Washington, DC and London, England, in 1922, and 1930 respectively, and the Geneva Conference of 1932. The World Disarmament Conference [formally known as the Conference for the Reduction and Limitation of Armaments] convened in Geneva on 01 February 1932. Disarmament had been a lively topic in diplomacy since the World War, and while statesmen tended to view it cynically, the Depression had made armaments more of a burden for all nations (ironically, the race to rearm in the late thirties would be credited by some observers with breaking the Depression). There was hope, if not conviction, that an acceptable disarmament formula might be found. Hoover was a strong supporter of disarmament, principally for economic reasons. He hoped that even the nervous French could be coaxed into an agreement that would allow reduction of armaments by one-third. One of the often suggested substitutes for arms limitation (the word disarmament was a misnomer; hardly anyone, even among the most ardent pacifists, saw much of a chance for total disarmament) was an agreement to abolish "aggressive" or "offensive" weapons, which included submarines and bombers. Submarines and bombers were not only burdens on the taxpayers of the great powers that maintained them, but there were unsettled moral questions regarding their use. Submarines had been used against ocean liners carrying noncombatants. Likely targets for bombers were cities... Rmainder Here: http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/naval-arms-control-1932.htm ---------------- THIS IS HOW GUN CONTROL WORKS AS OUR DULY ELECTED PLAY THE ROLE OF THE "STALKING HORSE" MAKING LAWS TO DISARM THE PEOPLE WHO ARE TRYING TO PROTECT THEMSELVES, THEIR FAMILY'S, AND THEIR PROPERTY.. [....A stalking horse is a figure that tests a concept with someone or mounts a challenge against someone on behalf of an anonymous third party. If the idea proves viable or popular, the anonymous figure can then declare its interest and advance the concept with little risk of failure. If the concept fails, the anonymous party will not be tainted by association with the failed concept and can either drop the idea completely or bide its time and wait until a better moment for launching an attack. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stalking_horse ] You're sound asleep when you hear a thump outside your bedroom door. Half-awake, and nearly paralyzed with fear, you hear muffled whispers. At least two people have broken into your house and are moving your way. With your heart pumping, you reach down beside your bed and pick up your shotgun. You rack a shell into the chamber, then inch toward the door and open it... In the darkness, you make out two shadows. One holds something that looks like a crowbar. When the intruder brandishes it as if to strike, you raise the shotgun and fire. The blast knocks both thugs to the floor. One writhes and screams while the second man crawls to the front door and lurches outside. As you pick up the telephone to call police, you know you're in trouble. In your country, most guns were outlawed years before, and the few that are privately owned are so stringently regulated as to make them useless.. Yours was never registered. Police arrive and inform you that the second burglar has died. They arrest you for First Degree Murder and Illegal Possession of a Firearm. When you talk to your attorney, he tells you not to worry: authorities will probably plea the case down to manslaughter. "What kind of sentence will I get?" you ask. "Only ten-to-twelve years," he replies, as if that's nothing. "Behave yourself, and you'll be out in seven." The next day,the shooting is the lead story in the local newspaper. Somehow, you're portrayed as an eccentric vigilante while the two men you shot are represented as choirboys. Their friends and relatives can't find an unkind word to say about them.. Buried deep down in the article, authorities acknowledge that both "victims" have been arrested numerous times. But the next day's headline says it all: "Lovable Rogue Son Didn't Deserve to Die." The thieves have been transformed from career criminals into Robin Hood-type pranksters.. As the days wear on, the story takes wings. The national media picks it up, then the international media. The surviving burglar has become a folk hero. Your attorney says the thief is preparing to sue you, and he'll probably win. The media publishes reports that your home has been burglarized several times in the past and that you've been critical of local police for their lack of effort in apprehending the suspects. After the last break-in, you told your neighbor that you would be prepared next time. The District Attorney uses this to allege that you were lying in wait for the burglars. A few months later, you go to trial. The charges haven't been reduced, as your lawyer had so confidently predicted. When you take the stand, your anger at the injustice of it all works against you.. Prosecutors paint a picture of you as a mean, vengeful man. It doesn't take long for the jury to convict you of all charges. The judge sentences you to life in prison. ------------------ The above scenario described actually happened. On August 22,1999, Tony Martin of Emneth, Norfolk , England, killed one burglar and wounded a second. In April, 2000, he was convicted and is now serving a life term.. How did it become a crime to defend one's own life in the once great British Empire? It started with the Pistols Act of 1903. This seemingly reasonable law forbade selling pistols to minors or felons and established that handgun sales were to be made only to those who had a license. The Firearms Act of 1920 expanded licensing to include not only handguns but all firearms except shotguns.. Later laws passed in 1953 and 1967 outlawed the carrying of any weapon by private citizens and mandated the registration of all shotguns. Momentum for total handgun confiscation began in earnest after the Hungerford mass shooting in 1987. (Another false flag?) Michael Ryan, a mentally disturbed man (of course - most likely a victim of MK Ultra) with a Kalashnikov rifle, walked down the street shooting everyone he saw. When the smoke cleared, 17 people were dead. The British public, already de-sensitized by eighty years of "gun control", demanded even tougher restrictions. (The seizure of all privately owned handguns was the objective even though Ryan used a rifle.) Nine years later, at Dunblane, Scotland, Thomas Hamilton used a semi-automatic weapon to murder 16 children and a teacher at a public school. (Are we beginning to see a pattern here? Sandy Hook ring any bells?) For many years, the media had portrayed all gun owners as mentally unstable, or worse, criminals. Now the press had a (lone nutter portrayal again) real kook with which to beat up law-abiding gun owners. Day after day, week after week, the media gave up all pretense of objectivity and demanded a total ban on all handguns. The Dunblane Inquiry, a few months later, sealed the fate of the few sidearm's still owned by private citizens. During the years in which the British government incrementally took away most gun rights, the notion that a citizen had the right to armed self-defense came to be seen as vigilantism. Authorities refused to grant gun licenses to people who were threatened, claiming that self-defense was no longer considered a reason to own a gun. Citizens who shot burglars or robbers or rapists were charged while the real criminals were released. Indeed, after the Martin shooting, a police spokesman was quoted as saying, "We cannot have people take the law into their own hands." All of Tony Martin's neighbors had been robbed numerous times, and several elderly people were severely injured in beatings by young thugs who had no fear of the consequences. Martin himself, a collector of antiques, had seen most of his collection trashed or stolen by burglars. When the (false flag) Dunblane Inquiry ended, citizens who owned handguns were given three months to turn them over to local authorities. Being good British subjects, most people obeyed the law. The few who didn't were visited by police and threatened with ten-year prison sentences if they didn't comply. Police later bragged that they'd taken nearly 200,000 handguns from private citizens. How did the authorities know who had handguns? The guns had been registered and licensed. Kind of like cars. Sound familiar? ------------------- If you think this is important, please forward to everyone you know. You had better wake up, because Obama and the other control freaks in congress are doing this very same thing, over here, if they can get away with it. Will you let them? WAKE UP AMERICA; THIS IS WHY OUR FOUNDING FATHERS PUT THE SECOND AMENDMENT IN OUR CONSTITUTION. "...It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds.." --Samuel Adams

The United States Of Delusion

Submitted by Tyler Durden on 01/04/2013 11:27 -0500

Submitted by Charles Hugh-Smith of OfTwoMinds blog,
The irony is that clinging to delusion rather than face the necessity of deep cuts in borrow-and-squander budgets will lead to the involuntary reset of the entire system, depriving every vested interest of their share of the swag.

We are living in the United States of Delusion. The delusion has four key sources:

1. We can borrow-print-and-spend our way to prosperity when debt and fiscal/monetary stimulus are yielding ever more marginal returns:
 

The Dangerous Blindspots of Clueless Keynesians (January 2, 2013) The Keynesian model is a Cargo Cult, mired in a distant, romanticized past where Central Planning, intervention and manipulation were solutions rather than the root of the economy's fatal disease.
 

2. The risks of this fatal fiscal delusion are masked by a complicit Mainstream Media and a perception-management, manipulation-dependent Central State and Federal Reserve.
 

Spoiled Teenager Syndrome (January 3, 2013) Masking risk, cost and consequence creates an illusory world that eventually crashes on the unforgiving rocks of reality.

Is masking risk, cost and consequence a strategy that leads to success? No; it is a pathway to repeated catastrophic failure. What is the Central Planning strategy being pursued by our Central State and the Federal Reserve? Masking risk, cost and consequence.

3. The true costs of the Neoliberal Cartel State are cloaked, massaged and distorted by bogus budgets and wildly unrealistic projections.
 

Sickcare Will Bankrupt the Nation--And Soon (March 21, 2011)

Sickcare is fundamentally a system of interlinked politically powerful cartels.Insiders who refuse to speak on the record for fear of antagonizing the powers that be, exorbitant price increases, confidential agreements and a tug-of-war between warring tribes. Is this the Mafia we're talking about?
From the point of view of investigative journalism, it could al 

so describe America's health care industry. Stated truthfully, the industry is a highly profitable and politically powerful group of companies which operate in cartel-like fashion: that is, they use their clout to limit competition and establish highly profitable pricing. 

Western Pennsylvania has about 140 MRI machines, while the 32 million residents of Canada share 151 MRI machines. And the U.S. machines are getting a lot of use: the number of CT and MRI scans (scans other than old-fashioned X rays) tripled from 85 to 234 per thousand insured people since 1999.
While proponents are quick to note that scans are cheaper than the alternative diagnostic procedures, one firm's research found that a doctor who owns his own machine is four times as likely to order a scan as a doctor who doesn't. 

As if that wasn't enough to highlight the self-serving nature of "fee for service" cartels, MRI scanner manufacturer General Electric waged a two-year lobbying campaign to roll back cuts in Medicare reimbursements for scans. While the effort proved unsuccessful due to the intense political pressure to reduce soaring Medicare costs, critics observed that providers simply made up the reduced reimbursements by increasing the number of tests administered. 

The only solution that actually addresses the systemic problem is to get rid of the entire fee-for-service structure and break up the cartels.Healthcare must be reconnected to diet, nutrition, fitness, lifestyle and community, and to education and emotional well-being.

If You Want Solutions, First Pin Down Where the Money Is Going (May 23, 2011)

If you really want a solution, then start by pinning down exactly who's getting all the money. Then find out if they're accountable for how it's spent. Nobody wants to admit the reality: our nation is dominated by cartels and fiefdoms serving entrenched constituencies whose budgets are simply not sustainable.Please consider this chart of the University of California system's employment of professors and administration. If we extrapolate the lines, then soon there will be more highly-compensated seat-warmers in administration than there will be professors teaching in the classrooms.

It seems that some members of the Education Cartel and Fiefdom came to do good but stayed to do well--as in triple the national median earnings of full-time workers: 

(Source: www.championnews.net/ftf_teacher.php?tid=78195&year=2010)  

Salary: $172,163
Position: High School Teacher
Full/Part Time: Fulltime
Percent Time Employed: 100%
Assignment: Physics (Grades 9-12 Only)
Years Teaching: 30.5
Degree: Master's

Salary: $163,526
Position: High School Teacher
Full/Part Time: Fulltime
Percent Time Employed: 100%
Assignment: Driver Education
Years Teaching: 32
Degree: Master's

And how about those pension and retirement costs? We have an answer for New York City, and it is sobering. NYC budget - pension costs skyrocketing:

Over the past decade, New York City hasn’t really grown its population but has increased expenses from $28.8 billion to $49.7 billion. The vast majority of that $20.9 billion increase has been in the form of more dollars to fewer employees. Pension costs are killing us most: this has grown from $1.3 billion in 2002 to $8.3 billion in 2012.

That's a 638% increase in pension costs in one decade, while the city budget leaped 72% despite a stable population. The share of the budget devoted to pensions jumped from 4.5% in 2002 to 16.7% in 2012.

I have addressed these issues many times, for example in The Devolution of the Consumer Economy, Part II: Rising Costs, Declining Wages (April 8, 2011) and Complexity: Bureaucratic (Death Spiral) and Self-Organizing (Sustainable) (February 17, 2011).
 

I have highlighted the Education and Sickcare Cartels, but there are many others with exploding costs and zero alignment with accountability or performance. The Department of Defense, famous for routinely losing track of hundreds of billions of dollars (and does anyone lose their job over that gross mismanagement? No, everyone gets a promotion and raise for doing such a swell job), manages to triple the cost of every weapons system, regardless of the actual performance benefits (increasingly marginal, perhaps?)
 

The new F-35 fighter aircraft cost $150 million each, once we add in the overruns, replacing the Super Hornet F-18 E/F that cost $57 million each. (Once lifetime costs are included, the F-35 will cost upwards of $300 million each.) Is the F-35 really three times better than the F-18? Which would a commander facing 100 bogeys rather have, 30 F-35s or 90 F-18s? (I suspect they'd take the 90 F-18s, as long as they were loaded with the latest Sidewinder and long-range air-to-air missiles. As has been famously pointed out, at some point quantity becomes a winning quality.)
 

Will 100 F-35s prevail over 1,000 dirt-cheap drones? How about 10,000 drones? If the future of warfare is increasingly powerful unmanned networked drones (and it clearly is), why are we spending $1 trillion+ on hyper-costly aircraft that are essentially designed for a previous era?
 

4. The consequence of substituting delusion for reality is ignored or hidden from view, with the complicity of all the self-serving, entrenched vested-interests.
 

Is there any evidence that continuing to borrow and squander money on diminishing returns will magically cause a sudden return to productive investment? Of course there isn't; the magical belief that doing more of what has failed will eventually evade causality is delusional.
 

Does anyone seriously think that counterproductive "investments" in diminishing returns will "grow our way out of debt"? Of course not; everyone with a vested interest in the crumbling Status Quo is terrified that their share of the borrowed/printed swag will be cut. So the only alternative is to cling to a delusional state where belief in the impossible replaces a realistic assessment of risk, cost and consequence.
 

The irony is that this strategy of clinging to delusion rather than face the necessity of deep cuts in borrow-and-squander budgets will lead to the involuntary reset of the entire system, depriving every vested interest of their share of the swag. Is delusion a sustainable state? No. Thus we can confidently predict that causality, factuality and karma will eventually sweep aside delusion and all those who cling to it.

Golden Age Of Gaia Update 1/4/13

Time to Begin the Planning of a New World, a World that Works for Everyone and more...

In This Update... Time to Begin the Planning of a New World, a World that Works for Everyone Exposed: What’s Inside America’s Banks? – Part 1/3 SaLuSa: January 4, 2013 DL Zeta: Our Movement into the New Time is Vertical, Not Linear Idle No More: Hints of a Global Super-Movement More Ascension Experiences Jesus: No Post Today What There Is to Do to Create a New World, a World that Works for Everyone GaiaPortal: Aspects of Higher Dimensional Life Implanted in DNA Have Been Activated New Site Redesign: Golden Age of Gaia Memo The New Generation: UFO Disclosure More Recent Articles

REMINDER: union states assembly call tonight Jan. 4 at 9:00 PM est

Greetings to my brothers and sisters.  Thanks for your prayers and positive wishes. I am back from the valley of the shadow of death. I have been through many things, but this one almost did me in (and there were times I was wishing it would get it over with) – not fully recovered, but at least I can raise my head off the pillow now and eat something occasionally.  I will not bore you with details, but it seems there were complications on top of complications. I hope this will serve as a response to each individual inquiry I have received. I look forward to meeting with you on the call this evening, although I probably won’t be doing much, if any talking.

Thanks again – God Bless

gene

union states assembly call tonight Jan. 4 at 9:00 PM est. 218-895-0970 pin 396109#

Tonight's agena: - Divided into three segments:

 Segment 1.  Identify and recruit capable people in each of the original 13 colonies who will help organize a group of fellow state inhabitants to stake their claim of freedom and give Lawful Notice to the world.

Segment 2.  Identify and recruit capable people in each of the “territory states” who will help organize a group of fellow state inhabitants to stake their claim of freedom and give Lawful Notice to the world.

Segment 3. Only after the above business is completed, will other issues be discussed - just be patient if you have a topic needing to be brought forward - you WILL be heard.

9:00 PM eastern  218-895-0970  pin 396109#

Please join us - AND bring a friend

You may also listen the call through Talk Shoe:

Dial: (724) 444-7444

1. Enter: 124598 # (Call ID)
2. Enter: 1 # or your PIN

OR just listen  from your computer:

1. Click here to join the call or just listen along

Here are some recordings that will help introduce your friends to the union states project:  

Utube describing union states project:  http://youtu.be/SHWDwlEE85s 

7  minute utube intro to union states

http://www.talkshoe.com/talkshoe/web/talkCast.jsp?masterId=124598&

800-858-6563 – 8 minute telephone introduction to union states.

http://www.unionstatesproject.info/ - A 50 minute audio overview and explanation of the union state project.

http://www.unionstatesproject.org/ - union state website containing documents and archived recordings of our assembly meetings.

union states email:   info@unionstatesproject.info

Ted Wyland audio series comparing the Constitution and the Bible, and documents http://www.bcmin.us/library/links-for-listeners/audio-weiland-const-n-series 

. 

Protect Your Gun Rights

Protect Your Gun Rights


Demand A Real Plan - Disarmament leads to Democide

The Health Ranger
Published on Jan 3, 2013

This hard-hitting public service announcement exposes the truth about government violence against the People: DEMOCIDE is the #1 cause of death in our world.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IDlbg1VoMZ0

***************************
NY county: Releasing gun names endangers public

By EILEEN A.J. CONNELLY
Associated Press
Jan 4, 2013

NEW YORK (AP) — A New York county clerk justified his refusal to release the names and addresses of handgun permit holders to a newspaper, saying it would give stalkers and thieves a convenient roadmap to target potential victims — and determine whether they have a gun.

"This certainly puts my public in danger," Putnam County Clerk Dennis Sant said Thursday following a news conference in which he was backed by the county executive and other elected officials.

The Journal News, which serves New York City's northern suburbs, sparked an outcry last month when it published clickable online maps with the names and addresses of pistol permit holders in Rockland and Westchester counties.

When the newspaper requested the same information from Putnam, Sant initially said the county needed more time to fulfill the request. Sant balked entirely this week, saying the law gives him the prerogative to refuse to release public information if it endangers the public. Judges and police officers could be targeted by the people they put behind bars, he said. People with orders of protection have expressed concern to him about would-be attackers finding them through the database.....

http://news.yahoo.com/ny-county-releasing-gun-names-endangers-public-232227585.html

***************************
Full Disclosure: CO, WI, CT shootings.. Are These The Work of "Lone Wolf" Gunmen?

Ben Swann
Published on Jan 3, 2013

Ben Swann Full Disclosure looks at eyewittness accounts from the scenes of the colorado theater shooting, the wisconsin sikh temple shooting and the connecticut elementary school shooting that indicate more than one shooter may have been involved in all three shootings.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wZPS7AdgNgE&feature=youtu.be



"The hottest places in hell are reserved for those who in times of great
moral crises maintain their neutrality" -Dante Alighieri

They who watch while our elected officials are ravaging our country
should consider that...Vin

Join The Fight - Expose Globalism and The New World Order

---