Wednesday, January 9, 2013

More TAXES...They will now hit you hard


Sent: Wednesday, January 9, 2013 10:34 AM
Subject: More TAXES...They will now hit you hard


13 NewTax Increases Just Went Into Effect ......................

President Obama: “I Won’t Raise Taxes on Middle Class America”


If I had $100 for every time I heard Barack Obama promise us that he would not raise taxes on middle class Americans, I could afford to take my family on a Hawaiian vacation.
Between the fiscal cliff resolution which wasn’t a resolution after all, and Obamacare, there are 13 new tax increases that will directly or indirectly impact everyone in America, including the middle and poverty class people.
Taxes with a direct impact on the middle and poverty class:
1.  Right off the bat, the fiscal cliff agreement that would only raise taxes on the wealthy, just raised EVERYONE’S payroll Social Security tax by 2%.  The old rate was 4.2%, but that was raised for everyone across the board to 6.2%.  A family making a combined gross of $50,000 will pay an additional $1,000 in Social Security taxes.  Right there Obama broke his promise and proved to the entire nation that he is a blatant liar and that his word can never be trusted.  Not exactly a trait you want in your national bleeder, I mean leader.
2.  Thanks to Obamacare, you will be hit with the medical device tax.  This clever tax places a 2.3% excise tax on all qualifying medical devices, which will be paid by the manufacturer.  That means that they will raise their prices in order to recover the increase taxes that they have to pay and that increase will float down the line until it hits you.  What are some of the medical devices that qualify?  Would you believe the protective gloves that every medical personnel in the US wears?  Let’s not forget things like catheters, C-PaP machines, Oxygen masks, wheelchairs, and the list goes on and on and on.  If you see any kind of doctor, dentist or whoever, you will be paying more.
3.  Reduction in allowable medical expenses for tax deduction purposes.  I remember a time when I actually got to deduct medical expenses on my income taxes, but every time Washington looks at ways to raise taxes, this always seems to be a favorite and it is again.  If you thought it was difficult to incur enough medical bills to actually be able to use a portion of them as a deduction, get ready to see even less.  They are making it almost impossible to have any useable medical deductions, unless you paid out tens of thousands of dollars, and then you might be able to deduct a few hundred dollars, if you’re lucky.
Taxes with an indirect impact on the middle and poverty class:
Before I start listing these other 10 tax increases that will impact you indirectly, let me ask a question or two?  Who is it that supplies most of the jobs in America?  Simple, it’s people with enough money to own and operate a business.  What happens if you start taking money away from them?  Simple again, they won’t be able to provide as many jobs for you and me.  Any person with common sense can understand this basic business principle, but then who said the people in Washington have any common sense?
4.  Income taxes for those individuals making $400,000 (families $450,000) will go from 35% to 39.6%.  Add that to the 2% increase in Social Security taxes and these people will automatically be paying 6.6% more in taxes.  On $400,000, that’s an increase of $26,400 a year.  That’s the equivalent of one employee making $12.69 per hour working a standard 40 hour week.  How do you think they are going to pay for those extra taxes?  Yep, there goes at least two employees out the door because you have account for employer taxes and benefits, so that employee making $12.69 per hour actually costs the employer over $30,000 per year.
5.  Thanks to Obamacare, people making $200,000 or families making $250,000 will be hit with a 0.9% payroll tax increase in the hospital insurance portion.  That’s $1,800 for someone making just $200,000 or $3,600 for that person making $400,000 that we talked about earlier.
6.  Personal exemptions used in calculating one’s adjusted gross income will be phased out for individuals making $250,000 or families making $300,000.  I believe that’s about $3,800 per personal exemption or $7,600 for a married couple.
7.  Itemized deductions are being reduced for people making $250,000 or families making $300,000.  That’s going to cost them at least another $1,000 or more in taxes.
8.  All you rich people are going to pay even more for any dividend or capital gains.  If you make $400,000 or your family makes $450,000, you will see your tax rate on dividends and capital gains go from 15% to 20%.  All those stocks and properties you own just got more expensive, meaning there goes another employee or two.
9.  How this one tax can be explained I haven’t a clue, but under Obamacare, anyone making $200,000 or families making $250,000 will have to pay a 3.8% surtax on all investment income.
10.  The Death Tax.  Many business empires have been able to endure because of being passed down from one family member to the next.  But that’s not to be allowed in a socialistic government.  So on any estates worth $5 million or more, the death tax will increase from 35% to 40%.  Let’s put this into perspective.  Say your family owns a business that is worth exactly $5 million and in today’s competitive market operates on a very thin profit margin.  The principle owner dies and the business, which is part of the estate, is taxed under the death tax.  The amount of taxes owed the government just went from $1.75 million to $2 million, an increase of $250,000.  How many businesses today can afford to keep their doors open if they are forced to pay a death tax of $2 million?  The tradition of family legacies will quickly become a thing of the past and many long time businesses will be forced to close their doors and put thousands of people out of a job.
11. Taxes on business investments will increase.  The amount of deductions for business investments will not only decrease but may soon disappear altogether.  So how many of you will want to invest in a company if you can’t get any type of deduction on your investment?  How many companies are going to lose investors and end up going out of business?  This is yet another means to reduce the so-called wealthy to the ranks of the middle and poverty class which is simple Marxist economics.
12.  Corporations that have had a tax deduction to the Medicare Part D subsidy, will see that deduction go the way of the dodo bird.  No more deduction which directly impacts the bottom line.  Oops, there goes a few more employees out the door.
13. Health insurance companies enjoy a corporate tax deduction for the compensation they pay their executives.  That deduction is going to be cut back somewhat which will impact the bottom line of the health insurance companies.  So how do you expect them to make up that loss?  In the health insurance business, everything trickles down to the bottom where it will either cost you more in premiums and/or a reduction in services covered.
When all is said and done, not only are all of us facing more taxes, but our bosses are facing a huge chunk of change.  A business owner making $400,000 who is married, will looking at $40,000 to $50,000 in additional taxes in one form or another.  That’s a 12.5 percent difference.  I was in the business world for a number of years and I don’t know too many businesses that enjoy a 12.5% profit margin, especially in today’s economy.
Once Obama won re-election, we saw a number of businesses, large and small, start reducing the staff in preparation of all of the tax increase.  Although most of those increases may not affect you directly, they are going to affect jobs and the nation’s economy.  Thousands are already being laid off because of it and Obama and his cronies claim they don’t see how it will have a negative impact.  But don’t forget, this is the guy who repeatedly promised that he wouldn’t raise taxes on middle class America.
I wonder how all of those Democrats who believed Obama’s lies are going to feel now as their paychecks shrink, their income taxes go up and they start losing their jobs?  It’s their own fault!

The total destruction of the USA is at hand. Socialists and communists governments always start by taxing the people into oblivion where the "state" owns all the assets. The trick is to destroy the rich who create the jobs, have the government hire specific people (the people who have voted them onto power), take all the guns,  use ther military against the people and crush any opposition, destroy the middle class so they must be dependant on the government and dont worry about the lower class for they have aways wanted to be taken care of. Make a two-class society...the workers and the "elitists."

If you can not see this pattern emerging...then you are willfully blind, and deserve exactly what you get. Think about contrived government propogated race riots, police/military/DHS kicking in doors to check for guns, check points all along the highways, willful government destruction of your home garden, making  a drilled well on your own property illegal, imprisonment without any allegations or trials, thought police, no personal freedoms, and FEMA prisons.



Message from Sheriff Mack


I would like to invite all of my friends, neighbors and countrymen to join the Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officer's Association. Please go to the CSPOA website and become a member.
To join now Click Here
It is our goal to educate voters and to elect county sheriffs that will be the guardian of our liberty and the defenders of our Constitution.
Sincerely,
Richard Mack


Historic old plane found in Russia !!!


Historic old plane  found  in Russia !!!

After 60 years, a Bell P-39 Airacobra was found intact in Russia with a Harrison Radiator in it. Did you know that the girls, like Rosie the Riveter, who built these planes wrote their names and addresses on the plane's bulkheads? They're still there!

http://link.brightcove.com/services/player/bcpid34757272001?bclid=0&bctid=87804472001

The Four Business (Mafia-Like) GANGS that Run the U.S.


The Rumor Mill News Reading Room 

The Four Business (Mafia-Like) GANGS that Run the U.S.
Posted By: Susoni [Send E-Mail]
Date: Wednesday, 9-Jan-2013 14:56:41

I disagree, heartily, that things are not as bad in Aussie land. I have Aussie friends and I know better. Of course everyone sees their own country through rose colored glasses..
Susoni
****************************************************************
First is the well-known military-industrial complex. ''As [President] Eisenhower famously warned in his farewell address in January 1961, the linkage of the military and private industry created a political power so pervasive that America has been condemned to militarisation, useless wars and fiscal waste on a scale of many tens of trillions of dollars since then,'' he says.
Advertisement
Second is the Wall Street-Washington complex, which has steered the financial system towards control by a few politically powerful Wall Street firms, notably Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase, Citigroup, Morgan Stanley and a handful of other financial firms.
These days, almost every US Treasury secretary - Republican or Democrat - comes from Wall Street and goes back there when his term ends. The close ties between Wall Street and Washington ''paved the way for the 2008 financial crisis and the mega-bailouts that followed, through reckless deregulation followed by an almost complete lack of oversight by government''.
Third is the Big Oil-transport-military complex, which has put the US on the trajectory of heavy oil-imports dependence and a deepening military trap in the Middle East, he says.
''Since the days of John D. Rockefeller and the Standard Oil Trust a century ago, Big Oil has loomed large in American politics and foreign policy. Big Oil teamed up with the automobile industry to steer America away from mass transit and towards gas-guzzling vehicles driving on a nationally financed highway system.''
Big Oil has consistently and successfully fought the intrusion of competition from non-oil energy sources, including nuclear, wind and solar power.
It has been at the side of the Pentagon in making sure that America defends the sea-lanes to the Persian Gulf, in effect ensuring a $US100 billion-plus annual subsidy for a fuel that is otherwise dangerous for national security, Sachs says.
''And Big Oil has played a notorious role in the fight to keep climate change off the US agenda. Exxon-Mobil, Koch Industries and others in the sector have underwritten a generation of anti-scientific propaganda to confuse the American people.''
Fourth is the healthcare industry, America's largest industry, absorbing no less than 17 per cent of US gross domestic product.
''The key to understanding this sector is to note that the government partners with industry to reimburse costs with little systematic oversight and control,'' Sachs says. ''Pharmaceutical firms set sky-high prices protected by patent rights; Medicare [for the aged] and Medicaid [for the poor] and private insurers reimburse doctors and hospitals on a cost-plus basis; and the American Medical Association restricts the supply of new doctors through the control of placements at medical schools.
''The result of this pseudo-market system is sky-high costs, large profits for the private healthcare sector, and no political will to reform.''
Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/business/the-four-business-gangs-that-run-the-us-20121230-2c1e2.html#ixzz2HVgItblI

Obama Picks A Lying, Torture-Endorsing Executioner As CIA Head


The Rumor Mill News Reading Room 

Obama Picks A Lying, Torture-Endorsing Executioner As CIA Head
Posted By: RumorMail [Send E-Mail]
Date: Wednesday, 9-Jan-2013 13:20:47

The Obama legacy is surmised exceptionally well in the appointment of John Brennan as CIA director today.
One of the main reasons Obama elected to use the recent campaign slogan ‘Forward’, was because in his opinion, too many people were looking “backward”, and drawing direct comparisons between Obama and Bush’s core policies.
In an excellent column on the Guardian website today, Glenn Greenwald notes that it is precisely these kind of “Look Forward, not Backward” decrees that have enabled Brennan, a man who expressly endorsed the Bush torture programs, as well as extraordinary rendition, to become Obama’s CIA Director with barely a whimper of opposition.
Brennan was also intimately involved in the illegal NSA eavesdropping program that violated the Fourth Amendment, and called for the offending communications companies to be immunized from punishment.
In 2008, Brennan was forced to withdraw from the nomination as CIA head because of fierce opposition stemming from his actions as a Bush-era CIA official. Now those actions don’t seem to matter a damn, and Brennan will be free to further increase the frequency of secret drone strikes under the program that he has seized control of over the past four years as Obama’s counter-terrorism advisor.
As Greenwald notes:
Brennan last year got caughtoutright lying when he claimed Obama’s drone program caused no civilian deaths in Pakistan over the prior year. He also spouted complete though highly influential falsehoods to the world in the immediate aftermath of the Osama bin Laden killing, including claiming that bin Laden “engaged in a firefight” with Navy SEALS and had “used his wife as a human shield”. Brennan has also been in charge of many of Obama’s most controversial and radical policies, including “signature strikes” in Yemen – targeting people without even knowing who they are – and generally seizing the power to determine who will be marked for execution without any due process, oversight or transparency.
So, a lying, torture endorsing executioner who expressly believes that spying on the American people and detention without trial are sound government policies.
Who better to run the CIA?

Alex Jones vs Piers Morgan - EXPLOSIVE Interview (2 pt Video)


Rumor Mill News Agents Forum
Alex Jones vs Piers Morgan - EXPLOSIVE Interview (2 pt Video)
Posted By: Mr.Ed [Send E-Mail]
Date: Wednesday, 9-Jan-2013 13:35:51

Alex Jones vs Piers Morgan - EXPLOSIVE Interview
Alex Jones Piers Morgan Part 1. 1776 Will Commence Again' If Guns Taken Away - YouTube
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AtyKofFih8Y
Alex Jones Piers Morgan Part 2. 1776 Will Commence Again' If Guns Taken Away - YouTube
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tf-i3Y5iRYo
Published on Jan 7, 2013
Alex Jones vs Piers Morgan
Part 1 Video
Tonight Piers Morgan sat down with the creator of a White House petition to get him deported from the United States. Alex Jones was fired up throughout the entire interview, launching into a series of loud tirades against Morgan and gun control every few seconds. Every time Morgan tried to ask a question, Jones continued to pile through with his arguments.
Jones said the point of the petition was to bring attention to the fact that United States has a bunch of foreigners bragging about taking away the guns of Americans while the gov't amasses more weapons for themselves. He said that the Second Amendment isn't for "duck-hunting," it's to protect us from "tyrannical government." He raised his voice to declare to Morgan, "1776 will commence again if you try to take our firearms!"
Morgan attempted to explain that the United States has significantly more gun murders than England, but Jones dismissed the argument outright. He called England a "police state," telling Morgan he "fled" to the United States, going so far as to call Morgan a "hatchet man of the New World Order."
Morgan tried to patiently walk through the finer points of the gun control debate with Jones, but he went on tirade after tirade on an ever-angrier series of tangents. Jones repeatedly criticized Morgan for trying to trip him off with "little factoids" instead of getting to the heart of the gun debate.
Alex Jones Piers Morgan
Part 2. Video
1776 Will Commence Again' If Guns Taken Away video
Tonight Piers Morgan sat down with the creator of a White House petition to get him deported from the United States. Alex Jones was fired up throughout the entire interview, launching into a series of loud tirades against Morgan and gun control every few seconds. Every time Morgan tried to ask a question, Jones continued to pile through with his arguments.

Jones said the point of the petition was to bring attention to the fact that United States has a bunch of foreigners bragging about taking away the guns of Americans while the gov't amasses more weapons for themselves. He said that the Second Amendment isn't for "duck-hunting," it's to protect us from "tyrannical government." He raised his voice to declare to Morgan, "1776 will commence again if you try to take our firearms!"
Morgan attempted to explain that the United States has significantly more gun murders than England, but Jones dismissed the argument outright. He called England a "police state," telling Morgan he "fled" to the United States, going so far as to call Morgan a "hatchet man of the New World Order."
Morgan tried to patiently walk through the finer points of the gun control debate with Jones, but he went on tirade after tirade on an ever-angrier series of tangents. Jones repeatedly criticized Morgan for trying to trip him off with "little factoids" instead of getting to the heart of the gun debate.

DAMNING EVIDENCE OF PRE-PLANED SANDY HOOK


DAMNING EVIDENCE OF PRE-PLANED SANDY HOOK
Sandy Hook "Donation Sites UP Before Shooting!" BUSTED - YouTube





Picture of baby reaching out of womb goes viral

Picture of baby reaching out of womb goes viral

by Jason Volentine


Posted on January 2, 2013 at 6:53 AM
Updated Wednesday, Jan 2 at 9:06 AM

PHOENIX -- Giving birth can be a blur but a Valley couple took a picture that brings it into crystal clarity.  The image of their baby reaching out of her mother’s womb to hold the finger of the doctor performing a C-section has gone viral.

The little baby’s name is Nevaeh – Heaven spelled backward.  Even the hospital staff told her parents there's something almost spiritual about the picture of Nevaeh holding the doctor's finger before technically being born.

“It was such an amazing photo.  [Hospital staff] had possibly heard of it happening but they had never seen a photo of it,” said Alicia Atkins, Nevaeh’s mother.

Few lives will be as well documented as little Nevaeh's. Her mother is a professional photographer who owns A Classic Pin-Up in Glendale. However, it was her dad, Randy, who snapped the picture.

“The doctor called me over and said, ‘Hey, she's grabbing my finger.’  So I ran over there and just grabbed the shot and I was just in awe looking at it.  It was such an amazing picture,” said Randy Atkins, adding that he was nervous about missing the precious and fleeting moment as he hurried to snap a picture.

The p
icture has gotten more than 10,000 views and 1,000 likes on Facebook. Alicia has even gotten a few offers to buy the photo.
Surprisingly though, the couple was never originally going to show the photo to anyone outside their family and friends.

“We didn't think we were going to get such positive feedback.  We thought we would get more negative ‘that's disgusting…’” Alicia said.  “[Instead] everybody just thought it was the best thing in the world.”

Nevaeh was born in October and has two older siblings, both of whom are enjoying the family's new-found popularity.

US Federal Reserve Controls Iraqi Foreign Currency


I was wondering when this was going to come out. Dick Cheney got all of their oil reserves from Bush. They have really raped that Country. And Bush and Saddam were buddies....Gee, that sounds familiar. I wonder if Obama picked up those tactics from buddy Bush.

01/09/2013

US Federal Reserve Controls Iraqi Foreign Currency


U.S. Federal Reserve Controls Iraqi Foreign Currency

Baghdad - Al-Hayat   Wednesday, January 9, 2013

A source familiar with the Central Bank of Iraq's Al-Hayat, that the Iraqi government is unable to act in cash reservoir abroad because it is lodged with the U.S. central bank.

He stressed that the latter had already agreed with the United Nations and the Department of the Central Bank of Iraq to reject the transfer any amount outside the framework of the budget.

The experts predicted the end of the crisis, the Central Bank of Iraq for fear of exposing the big names in the political and financial center, which was confirmed by sources familiar with the investigation, pointing to the issuance of a judicial decision to release the deputy governor of the Bank appearance in favor and 30 employees were arrested earlier.
...
The Supreme Judicial Council issued on 19 October (October) last arrest warrant against the Governor of the Central Bank and a number of officials in corruption cases, and arrested 32 staff with the governor's refusal to Shabibi decision.

Sources from within the central bank leaked «life» implementation details of the arrest of the deputy governor and showed that the warrant included three officials are Governor Sinan al-Shabibi and his deputy, the appearance of Saleh and General Manager of the banking sector Ali Abu Nayla.

The sources added that Shabibi and Abu Nayla not surrender themselves to the concerned authorities, but Saleh turned himself in after the security authorities arrested some members of his family.

She noted that the investigators concluded achieved with the deputy governor and is satisfied that there is no evidence incriminating, and decided to end his detention on bail pending completion of the investigation, but the security authorities represented by the Ministry of Interior refused to release him or allow the media confronted inside prison «upper» in Baghdad.

A source close to the investigation committee that «the number of staff of the Central Bank beyond 1235, distributors headquarters and four branches in Nineveh and Basra, Dohuk and Sulaymaniyah. He explained that the number of detainees less than 30, including 22 female and four officials, explaining that the reason for their arrest was that they were members of the board committee, where four staff members are elected to serve under the authority of the Board of Directors.

He confirmed that investigators had evacuated the last for the members of the Committee and some employees because they are not really concerned.

And the latest developments in the investigation pointed out that «the art is that the central bank adopted five banks eligibility to sell the dollar, and these banks offer to auction the bank to list in exchange for any amount of purchase, then implement the conversion and here are the responsibility of the Central implied not directly».

The «has not issued any arrest warrant against officials of private banks involved while making sure of its involvement money laundering operations or smuggled out of Iraq.

He was a member of the Finance Committee parliamentary Hassan Ozmn announced told media three weeks ago, that Iraqi funds abroad are exposed to the risk of international trusteeship because of the participation of the United Nations to investigate the issue of the Iraqi Central Bank, expected to appoint UN special rapporteur to monitor the movements of Finance of Iraq, but the Iraqi Foreign Ministry denied this.

Noteworthy that the Iraqi Central Bank announced in August 2012 Iraq reserves rise of hard currency to $ 67 billion from 63 billion.

Furthermore, official denied the central bank can manipulate government these precautions, and said: «is still under the tutelage of the United Nations under paragraphs seventh item, and proceeds from the sale oil goes directly to the account itself, and even going out of the trusteeship is already present in the bank U.S. who refuses any requests issued by the Iraqi government regarding financial withdrawals outside the framework of the budget, and this is agreed with the United Nations to prevent any theft operations in Iraq, which continues to suffer instability.

And threatened Iraqi Central Bank Governor Sinan al-Shabibi resorting to 'all means' if the case is not resolved within the country, saying that the immunity of the bank have been overcome in Iraq.


http://alhayat.com/Details/470558

http://www.dinarrecaps.com/1/post/2013/01/us-federal-reserve-controls-iraqi-foreign-currency.html

RETIRED ADMIRAL MAKES STUNNING ACCUSATION.... BENGHAZI-GATE IS THE TREASONOUS AND IMPEACHABLE CRIMINAL


The Rumor Mill News Reading Room 

RETIRED ADMIRAL MAKES STUNNING ACCUSATION.... BENGHAZI-GATE IS THE TREASONOUS AND IMPEACHABLE CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE THAT
Posted By: Seawitch [Send E-Mail]
Date: Wednesday, 9-Jan-2013 11:58:08

Retired Admiral Makes Stunning Accusation. Benghazi-Gate Is The Treasonous And Impeachable Criminal Enterprise That Can Bring Barack Obama Down.
It’s even worse that we previously thought. A retired four-star admiral is now claiming that Barack Obama intentionally conspired with America’s enemies to stage a bogus attack and the kidnapping of an American ambassador so he could “negotiate” the release of a “hostage” and bolster his mediocre approval ratings just prior to the election?
The Washington Examiner, quoting retired Four-Star Admiral James Lyons, writes: “[T]he attack on the American Consulate in Benghazi… was the result of a bungled abduction attempt…. the first stage of an international prisoner exchange… [that] would have ensured the release of Omar Abdel Rahman, the ‘Blind Sheik’…”
But something went horribly wrong with Obama’s “October Surprise.” Although the Obama Regime intentionally gutted security at the consulate prior to the staged kidnapping, former Navy SEALs Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty disobeyed direct orders to stand down, saved American lives, single-handedly killed scores of attackers…and the attackers, believing that the Obama Regime had betrayed them, tortured Ambassador Chris Stevens and dragged his body through the streets.
READ THE FULL ARTICLE AT THIS LINK:
http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2013/01/retired-admiral-makes-stunning-accusation-benghazi-gate-is-the-treasonous-impeachable-criminal-enterprise-that-can-bring-barack-obama-down-2531446.html

Innocents Betrayed - Genocide By Gun Control




Innocents Betrayed - Genocide By Gun Control - True History of Gun Confiscation 

WHY WOMEN IN CHINA DO NOT GET BREAST CANCER


Subject: Why women (and men) in China don't get breast cancer ...........

Very interesting it makes sense, but hard for many of us to follow.

THIS IS A WONDERFUL ARTICLE  ......... PLEASE PASS IT ON
Read this, it applies to men too     
                            



Prof Jane Plant
WHY WOMEN IN CHINA DO NOT GET BREAST CANCER - By Prof. Jane Plant, PhD, CBE

I had no alternative but to die or to try to find a cure for myself. I am a scientist - surely there was a rational explanation for this cruel illness that affects one in 12 women in the UK ?

I had suffered the loss of one breast, and undergone  radiotherapy. I was now receiving painful chemotherapy, and had been seen by some of the country's most eminent specialists. But, deep down, I felt certain I was facing death. I had a loving husband, a beautiful home and two young children to care for. I desperately wanted to live.

Fortunately, this desire drove me to  unearth the facts, some of which were known only to a handful of scientists at the time.

Anyone who has come into contact with breast cancer will know that certain risk factors - such as increasing age, early onset of womanhood, late onset of menopause and a family history of breast cancer - are completely out of our control. But there are many risk factors, which we can control easily.

These "controllable" risk factors readily translate into  simple changes that we can all make in our day-to-day lives to help prevent or treat breast cancer. My message is that even advanced breast cancer can be overcome because I have done it.

The first clue to understanding what was promoting my breast  cancer came when my husband Peter, who was also a scientist, arrived back from working in China while I was being plugged in for a chemotherapy session.

He had brought with him cards and  letters, as well as some amazing herbal suppositories, sent by my friends and science colleagues in China .

The suppositories  were sent to me as a cure for breast cancer. Despite the awfulness of the situation, we both had a good belly laugh, and I remember saying that this was the treatment for breast cancer in China , then it was little wonder that Chinese women avoided getting the disease.

Those words echoed in my mind.
   Why didn't Chinese women in China get breast cancer?   I had collaborated once with Chinese colleagues on a study of links between soil chemistry and disease, and I remembered some of the statistics.

The disease was virtually non-existent throughout the whole country. Only one in 10,000 women in China will die from it, compared to that terrible figure of one in 12 in Britain and the even grimmer average of one in 10 across most Western countries.
   It is not just a matter of China being a more rural country, with less urban pollution. In highly urbanized Hong Kong , the rate rises to 34 women in every 10,000 but still puts the West to shame.

The Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki  have similar rates. And remember, both cities were attacked with nuclear weapons, so in addition to the usual pollution-related cancers, one would also expect to find some radiation-related cases, too.

The conclusion we can draw from these statistics strikes you with some force. If a Western woman were to move to industrialized, irradiated Hiroshima , she would slash her risk of contracting breast cancer by half. Obviously this is absurd.
It seemed obvious to me that some lifestyle factor not related to pollution, urbanization or the environment is seriously increasing the Western woman's chance of contracting breast cancer.

I then discovered that whatever causes the huge differences in breast cancer rates between oriental and Western countries, it isn't genetic.

Scientific research showed that when Chinese or Japanese people move to the West, within one or two generations their rates of breast cancer approach those of their host community.

The same thing happens when oriental people adopt a completely Western lifestyle in Hong Kong . In fact, the slang name for breast cancer in China translates as 'Rich Woman's Disease'. This is because, in China, only the better off can afford to eat what is termed ' Hong Kong food'.

The Chinese describe all Western food, including everything from ice cream and chocolate bars to spaghetti  and feta cheese, as "Hong Kong food", because of its availability in the former British colony and its scarcity, in the past, in mainland China .

So it made perfect sense to me that whatever  was causing my breast cancer  and the shockingly high incidence in this country generally, it was almost certainly something to do with our better-off, middle-class, Western lifestyle.

There is an important point for men here, too. I have observed in my research that much of the data about prostate cancer leads to similar conclusions.

According to figures from the World Health Organization, the number of men contracting prostate cancer in rural China is negligible, only 0.5 men in every 100,000.
In England, Scotland and Wales , however, this figure is 70 times higher. Like breast cancer, it is a middle-class disease that primarily attacks the wealthier and higher socio-economic groups, those that can afford to eat rich foods.

I remember saying to my husband, "Come on Peter, you have just come back  from China . What is it about the Chinese way of life that is so different?"

Why don't they get breast cancer?'
We decided to utilize our joint scientific backgrounds and approach it  logically.

We examined scientific data that pointed us in the general direction of fats in diets.
Researchers had discovered in the 1980s that only l4% of calories in the average Chinese diet were from fat, compared to almost 36% in the West.
But the diet I had been living on for years before I contracted breast cancer was very low in fat and high in fiber.

Besides, I knew as a scientist that fat intake in adults has not been shown to increase risk for breast cancer in most investigations that have followed large groups of women for up to a dozen years.
Then one day something rather special happened. Peter and I have worked together so closely over the years that I am not sure which one of us first said: "The Chinese don't eat dairy produce!"
It is hard to explain to a non-scientist the sudden mental and emotional ' buzz' you get when you know you have had an important insight. It's as if you have had a lot of pieces of a jigsaw in your mind, and suddenly, in a few seconds, they all fall into place and the whole picture is clear.

Suddenly I recalled how many Chinese people were physically unable to  tolerate milk, how the Chinese people I had worked with had always said that milk was only for babies, and how one of my close friends, who is of Chinese origin, always politely turned down the cheese course at dinner parties.

I knew of no Chinese people who lived a traditional Chinese life who ever used cow or other dairy food to feed their babies. The tradition was to use a wet nurse but never, ever, dairy products.

Culturally, the Chinese find our Western preoccupation with milk and milk products very strange. I remember entertaining a large delegation of Chinese scientists shortly after the ending of the Cultural Revolution in the 1980s.

On advice from the Foreign Office, we had asked the caterer to provide a pudding that contained a lot of ice cream. After inquiring what the pudding consisted of, all of the Chinese, including their interpreter, politely but firmly refused to eat it, and they could not be persuaded to change their minds.

At the time we were all delighted and ate extra portions!

Milk, I discovered, is one of the most common causes of food allergies .
Over 70% of the world's population are unable to digest the milk sugar, lactose, which has led nutritionists to believe that this is the normal condition for adults, not some sort of deficiency. Perhaps nature is trying to tell us that we are eating the wrong food.

Before I had breast cancer for the first time, I had eaten a lot of dairy produce, such as skimmed milk, low-fat cheese and yogurt. I had used it as my main source of protein. I also ate cheap but lean minced beef, which I now realized was probably often ground-up dairy cow.

In order to cope with the chemotherapy I received for my fifth case of cancer, I had been eating organic yogurts as a way of helping my digestive tract to recover and repopulate my gut with 'good' bacteria.

Recently, I discovered that way back in 1989 yogurt had been implicated in ovarian cancer. Dr Daniel Cramer of Harvard University studied hundreds of women with ovarian cancer, and had them record in detail what they normally ate. Wish I'd been made aware of his findings when he had first discovered them.

Following Peter's and my insight into the Chinese diet, I decided to give up not just yogurt but all dairy produce immediately. Cheese, butter, milk and yogurt and anything else that contained dairy produce - it went down the sink or in the rubbish.

It is surprising how many products, including commercial soups, biscuits and cakes, contain some form of dairy produce. Even many proprietary brands of margarine marketed as soya, sunflower or olive oil spreads can contain dairy produce
.
I therefore became an avid reader of the small print on food labels.

Up to this point, I had been steadfastly measuring the progress of my fifth cancerous lump with callipers and plotting the results. Despite all the encouraging comments and positive feedback from my doctors and nurses, my own precise observations told me the bitter truth.

My first chemotherapy sessions had produced no effect - the lump was still the same size.

Then I eliminated dairy products. Within days, the lump started to shrink.


 About two weeks after my second chemotherapy session and one week after giving up dairy produce, the lump in my neck started to itch. Then it began to soften and to reduce  in size. The line on the graph, which had shown no change, was now pointing downwards as the tumor got smaller and smaller.

And, very significantly, I noted that instead of declining exponentially (a graceful curve) as cancer is meant to do, the tumor’s decrease in size was plotted on a straight line heading off the bottom of the graph, indicating a cure, not suppression (or remission) of the tumor.

One Saturday afternoon after about six weeks of excluding all dairy produce from my diet, I practiced an hour of meditation then felt for what was left of the lump. I couldn't find it. Yet I was very experienced at detecting cancerous lumps - I had discovered all five cancers on my own. I went downstairs and asked my husband to feel my neck. He could not find any trace of the lump either.

On the following Thursday I was due to be seen by my cancer specialist at  Charing Cross Hospital in London . He examined me thoroughly, especially my neck where the tumor had been. He was initially bemused and then delighted as he said, "I cannot find it." None of my doctors, it appeared, had expected someone with my type and stage of cancer (which had clearly spread to the lymph system) to survive, let alone be so hale and hearty.

My specialist was as overjoyed as I was. When I first discussed my ideas with him he was understandably skeptical. But I understand that he now uses maps showing cancer mortality in China in his lectures, and recommends a non-dairy diet to his cancer patients.

I now believe that the link between dairy produce and breast cancer is similar to the link between smoking and lung cancer.
I believe that identifying the link between breast cancer and dairy produce, and then developing a diet specifically targeted at maintaining the health of my breast and hormone system, cured me.

It was difficult for me, as it may be for you, to accept that a substance as 'natural' as milk might have such ominous health implications. But I am a living proof that it works and, starting from tomorrow, I shall reveal the secrets of my revolutionary action plan.

Extracted from Your Life in Your Hands, by Professor Jane Plan
  




Nalin Wijetilleke

MBA,CISA, CGEIT, PMP, CBCP, MBCI
Auckland, New Zealand
mob:
+64 21 659886
Dr. S. de Alwis - Seneviratne
FRCS, FRCOG, MRCP, MFFP, MRCS, FFSRH, (UK)
Master of Surgery
Former Head of Department Ob. / Gyn. Cayman Islands
Assistant Professor St.Matthew's University School of Medicine
Fellow of The Royal College of Obstetricians, Gynecologists & Surgeons (UK)
SENIOR SPECIALIST / CONSULTANT
Obstetrician & Gynecologist
The Chrissie Tomlinson Memorial Hospital
Walkers Road, George Town,
P.O.Box 10826,
Grand Cayman KY1-1007
Cayman Islands.
Office:
345-945-6066     Fax: 345-945-0161   E-mail: sarath@candw.ky 




Bradley Manning case update


Subject: Bradley Manning case update
Ronald

What is Bradley Manning's
crime?

Video:

http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/21870.html

- Brasscheck

P.S. Please share Brasscheck TV e-mails and
videos with friends and colleagues.

That's how we grow. Thanks.

================================

Visit out partner sites:

The Real Food Channel: http://RealFoodChannel.com
The truth about the food you eat

Real Econ TV: http://RealEconTV.com
Financial news without the big bank baloney

Jazz on the Tube: http://JazzontheTube.com
Take a jazz break

================================
Brasscheck TV
2380 California St.
San Francisco, CA 94115

To unsubscribe or change subscriber options visit:
http://www.aweber.com/z/r/?zAxs7OwctKxMHAzsTMwctEa0jOwMLEycnJw=

Cobra Update for Jan 8th + Link to Interview on Coast to Coast AM



2012thebigpicture posted: " Etheric Liberation Significant progress has been made in the last few days. The Light forces were finally able to put a virus into the etheric mainframe computer of the etheric Archon grid. This will have important long term consequences. There wil"

New post on 2012thebigpicture


Cobra Update for Jan 8th + Link to Interview on Coast to Coast AM

Etheric Liberation
Significant progress has been made in the last few days. The Light forces were finally able to put a virus into the etheric mainframe computer of the etheric Archon grid. This will have important long term consequences. There will be constant and expanding cracks in the etheric matrix and more and more Light and Love from the Galactic central sun will shine through. The long awaited Golden Age will finally slowly begin to manifest for humanity.
To create a support field for Lightworkers and Light warriors under attack, we have created the Etheric Liberation facebook group here:
For those needing deeper healing, we have created a special website with best healers available which will also become one of the primary nexus points for healers after the Event:
The Pleiadians have instructed us also to create a website with most advanced Pleiadian technologies available to assist you in your healing process, which include famous Receptors developed by Dr. Fred Bell, a well known Pleiadian contactee:
All this will help expanding the cracks in the matrix and will make room for more Light and Love to come through.
Victory of the Light is near!
Posted: 08 Jan 2013 12:00 PM PST
Cobra Coast to Coast Interview
You might want to listen to Cobra's first Coast to Coast interview which will be aired in less than 12 hours: [it took place on the evening of Jan 8th, so look for the archived call]


Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.


Right here in Casper Wyoming


CUSTOMER AND CLERK PULL A GUN....


A guy pulls a gun in a nail salon intending to rob it.  A customer pulls her gun.  Guy leaves.
http://trib.com/news/local/casper/article_e3236de2-6756-539a-92b0-ae3aaf64c900.html

Hotel robbery in Casper thwarted by clerk who pulled a gun from her lunchbox
http://trib.com/news/local/casper/casper-hotel-worker-uses-lunchbox-gun-to-thwart-robbery/article_91ae9ff7-9d6b-5e9b-a29c-2e015e03f004.html

There are many instances of a similar nature all over the USA where someone with a gun thwarts a crime, sometimes stops mass murders.

I'd say concealed weapons people are doing pretty well at helping curb crime.  If the liberal news media would report these things as avidly as they try to brainwash people into thinking lack of guns would be safer, then thugs would think twice before even attempting robbery.

who's money did they loan?


Please read these cases, then open the gif for Title 62 Revised Statutes Chapter 4. Read section 37 real close and ask yourself, Who's money did they loan?

A national bank cannot lend its credit or become the guarantor of the obligation of another unless it owns or has an interest in the obligation guaranteed especially where it receives no benefits therefrom. Citizens' Nat. Bank of Cameron v. Good Roads Gravel Co., Tex.Civ.App.1921, 236 S.W. 153, dismissed w.o.j.

A national bank has no power to guarantee the performance of a contract made for the sole benefit of another. First Nat. Bank v. Crespi & Co., Tex.Civ.App.1920, 217 S.W. 705, dismissed w.o.j.

National banks have no power to negotiate loans for others. Pollock v. Lumbermen's Nat. Bank of Portland , Or.1917, 168 P. 616, 86 Or. 324.

A national bank cannot act as broker in lending its depositors' money to third persons. Byron v. First Nat. Bank of Roseburg , Or.1915, 146 P. 516, 75 Or. 296.

A national bank is not authorized to act as a broker in loaning the money of others.  Grow v. Cockrill, Ark.1897, 39 S.W. 60, 63 Ark. 418. See, also, Keyser v. Hitz, D ist.Col.1883, 2 Mackey, 513.

Officers of national bank in handling its funds are acting in a fiduciary capacity, and cannot make loans and furnish money contrary to law or in such improvident manner as to imperil its funds. First Nat. Bank v. Humphreys, Okla.1917, 168 P. 410, 66 Okla. 186.

Representations made by bank president to proposed surety as to borrower's assets, in connection with proposed loan by bank, held binding on bank. Young v. Goetting, C.C.A.5 ( Tex. ) 1926, 16 F.2d 248.

Bank is liable for its vice president's participation in scheme to defraud depositor by facilitating prompt withdrawal of his money.  National City Bank v. Carter, C.C.A.6 ( Tenn. ) 1926, 14 F.2d 940.

A national bank receiving the proceeds of a customer's note and mortgage with authority to pay out the same upon a first mortgage lien upon real estate is acting intra vires and liable for breach of its duty. Brandenburg v. First Nat. Bank of Casselton, N. D .1921, 183 N.W. 643, 48 N. D . 176.

It has been held that the right to discount and negotiate notes, etc., goes no further than to authorize the taking of them in return for a loan of money made on the strength of the promises contained in them, and does not contemplate a purchase in the market.  Lazear v. National Union Bank, Md.1879, 52 Md. 78, 36 Am.Rep. 355.  See, also, Rochester First Nat. Bank v. Pierson, 1877, 24 Minn. 140, 31 Am.Rep. 341.

National bank is not authorized under national banking laws to lend deposited money on depositor's behalf.  Carr v. Weiser State Bank of Weiser, Idaho 1937, 66 P.2d 1116, 57 Idaho 599.

Under this section, a national bank had no authority to enter into a contract for loaning money of a depositor kept in a deposit account through its cashier authorized by the depositor to draw thereon to make loans. Holmes v. Uvalde Nat. Bank, Tex.Civ.App.1920, 222 S.W. 640, error refused.

A bank has no right to loan the money of other persons. Grow v. Cockrill, Ark.1897, 39 S.W. 60, 63 Ark. 418.

A "deposit for a specified purpose" is one in the making of which a trust fund is constituted with respect to which a special duty as to its application is assumed by the bank. Cooper v. National Bank of Savannah , Ga.App.1917, 94 S.E. 611, 21 Ga.App. 356, certiorari granted 38 S.Ct. 423, 246 U.S. 670, 62 L.Ed. 931, affirmed 40 S.Ct. 58, 251 U.S. 108, 64 L.Ed. 171.

Fund, deposited in bank for special purpose subject to depositor's check, remains property of depositor. U.S. Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corporation v. Atlantic Corporation, D .C.Mass.1925, 5 F.2d 529, error dismissed 16 F.2d 27.

'In the case of a special deposit, the bank assumes merely the charge or custody of propertywithout authority to use it, and the depositor is entitled to receive back the identical money or thing deposited.  In such case, the right of property remains in the depositor, and if the deposit is of money, the bank may not mingle it with its own funds.  The relation created is that of bailor and bailee, and not that of debtor and creditor.'  3 R.C.L. 522.  Tuckerman v. Mearns, App. D .C.1919, 262 F. 607, 49 App. D .C. 153.

National banks are liable for the loss of property held by them merely for the accommodation of their customers, without any consideration for the keeping of it except the profit derived from the banking business of such customers. Security Nat. Bank v. Home Nat. Bank, Kan.1920, 187 P. 697, 106 Kan. 303.