Tuesday, February 5, 2013

Hard Evidence of Corporate Takeover at All Levels of Government in America, as Well as of the United Nations



Hard Evidence of Corporate Takeover at All Levels of
Government in America, as Well as of the United Nations

Dunn & Bradstreet (D&B) DUNS code number are assigned to corporations in America to track their credit ratings.  Below you will find the DUNS numbers for the aggregate US government and each of its major agencies, those of the aggregate governments of each US state along with that of its largest city, and those of the aggregate United Nations and some of its major agencies.   These corporate code numbers can be verified by using the following link to the D&B website and typing in the required information:   http://mycredit.dnb.com/search-for-duns-number/

In checking DUNS code numbers for governments, you will find that they have many subsidiaries and shell corporations to lessen financial accountability.  You will find that some of them are listed as being in a geographical location other than in their territorial authority, making their operations even more suspicious.    The City of Chicago corporation, for example, is located in Washington, DC, the State of Montana Corporation is located in Chicago, Illinois and the State of Maine corporation – listed with seemingly sardonic humor as “State-O-Maine Inc.” – is located in New York City, New York.  You will often also see executive, legislative and judicial offices themselves listed as corporations.

Manta.com is a website for obtaining data on corporations.  If the names of any of these government entities are entered, you will find that virtually all of them are listed as private, for–profit corporations.   You will also see in the aggregate valuations of their assets that Manta.com provides is vastly greater than what is listed in these private government corporations’ fraudulent but well-publicized budget documents that seek to justify draconian but fraudulent budget cuts and their related tax-based extortion rackets.  

This confirms that many hundred trillions of dollars of the people’s money listed in the semi-secret government comprehensive annual financial reports (CAFRs) as government institutional investments are being siphoned off by the global banking cartel and those sinister forces behind it. 

They are doing this via that obscure subsidiary of the private, for-profit Federal Reserve System known as the Depository Trust Clearing Center (DTCC), dba Cede Inc. (Again, note the sardonic humor.)  This semi-secret entity fraudulently confiscates these investment funds as an executor after they have been registered by brokers, relegating investors to mere beneficiaries whose funds can then be lawfully – at least according to presently and commonly used Universal Commercial Code (UCC)-based statutory law, not constitutional or common law -- confiscated at the will of said executor.

The implications of this are staggering:  not only has this corporate subversion of government happened in America and with the United Nations headquartered here, but it has happened in almost all of the nations of the world by means of similar corporate subversion enacted under different names.  This definitely explains why governments at all levels in almost all nations no longer protect the public interest, but only special interests – specifically, the interests of their fellow predatory for-profit corporations whose actions are now destroying this planet and all life upon it. 

This explains why the people of the world are soon going to see sweeping constitutionally-based legal and law enforcement actions in all of the nations of the world against those who, unrepentantly abusing these ill-gotten gains, have perpetrated crimes against nature and humanity.  This also explains the honest transitional governments and financial systems that are going to be installed as the callous, corrupt human systems of the past collapse. The new transparent governmental and financial models now being tested in the nation of Iceland, as well as the likewise poorly publicized/contextualized mass resignations of government, banking and corporate officials now occurring worldwide are heralds of these imminent planetary events.

DUNS Numbers of the US Corporate Government and Most of Its Major Agencies

United States Government-052714196
US Department of Defense (DOD)-030421397
US Department of the Treasury-026661067
US Department of Justice (DOJ)-011669674
US Department of State-026276622
US Department of Health & Human Services (HHS)-Office of the Secretary-112463521
US Department of Education-944419592
US Department of Energy-932010320
US Department of Homeland Security-932394187
US Department of the Interior-020949010
US Department of Labor-029536183
US Department of Housing & Urban Development (HUD)-Office of the Secretary-030945779
US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)-931691211
US Transportation Security Administration (TSA)-050297655
US Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)-056622429
Bureau of Customs & Border Protection (CBP)-796730922
Federal Bureau of Immigration & Customs Enforcement (ICE)-130221646
US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)-057944910
National Aeronautics & Space Administration (NASA)-003259074
National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)-079933920
US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)-364281923
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)-037751583
Federal Communications Commission (FCC)-020309969
US Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC)-003475175
US Public Health Service (USPHS)-039294216
National Institutes of Health (NIH)-061232000
US Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (CDC)-927645465
US Food & Drug Administration (FDA)-138182175
US Internal Revenue Service (IRS)-040539587
Federal Reserve Board of Governors (Fed)-001959410
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)-878865674
National Security Agency (NSA)-617395215
US Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA)-167247027
Federal Bureau of Alcohol, Firearms & Tobacco (BAFT)-132282310
Federal Bureau of Land Management (BLM)-926038563
Federal Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA)-926038407

DUNS Numbers of Each US Corporate State and Its Largest City

State of Alabama-004027553                  City of Birmingham-074239450
State of Alaska-078198983                     City of Fairbanks-079261830
State of Arizona-068300170                    City of Phoenix-030002236
State of Arkansas-619312569                 City of Little Rock-065303794
State of California-071549000                 City of Los Angeles-159166271
State of Colorado-076438621                  City of Denver-066985480
State of Connecticut-016167285              City of Bridgeport-156280596
State of Delaware-037802962                  City of Wilmington-067393900
District of Columbia-949056860               City of Washington-073010550
State of Florida-004078374                     City of Miami-965299576
State of Georgia-069230183                    City of Atlanta-065372500
State of Hawaii-077676997                      City of Honolulu-828979612
State of Idaho-071875734                       City of Boise-070017017
State of Illinois-065232498                      City of Chicago-556057206
State of Indiana-071789435                     City of Indianapolis-964647155
State of Iowa-828089701             City of Davenport-963855494
State of Kansas-827975009                    City of Wichita-069862755
State of Kentucky-828008883                 City of Louisville-943445093
State of Louisiana-0612389911                City of New Orleans-033692404
State of Maine-061207536                      City of Portland, Maine-071747802
State of Maryland-847612442                  City of Baltimore-052340973
State of Massachussetts-138090548       City of Boston-007277284
State of Michigan-054698428                  City of Detroit-021733631
State of Minnesota-050375465                City of Minneapolis-009901959
State of Mississippi-008210692               City of Jackson-020864955
State of Missouri-616963596                   City of Kansas (City)-832496868
State of Montana-945782027                   City of Billings-068925759
State of Nebraska-041472307                 City of Omaha-926604690
State of Nevada-123259447                     City of Las Vegas-019342317
State of New Hampshire-066760232        City of Manchester-045009073
State of New Jersey-067373258              City of Newark-019092531
State of New Mexico-007111818 City of Albuquerque-129962346
State of New York-041002973                 City of New York-021741036
State of North Carolina-830979667           City of Charlotte-809275006
State of North Dakota-098564300            City of Bismarck-080245640
State of Ohio-034309166                        City of Columbus-010611869
State of Oklahoma-050411726                City of Oklahoma (City)-073131542
State of Oregon-932534998                     City of Portland (Oregon)-054971197
State of Pennsylvania-933882784            City of Philadelphia-929068737
State of Rhode Island-008421763            City of Providence-069853752
State of South Carolina-067006072          City of Columbia-878281562
State of Tennessee-04143882                 City of Memphis-051386258
State of Texas-002537595                      City of Houston-967421590
State of Utah-009094301                        City of Salt Lake City-017096780
State of Vermont-066760240                   City of Burlington-037442977
State of Virginia-047850373                    City of Virginia Beach-074736299
State of Washington-079248936              City of Seattle-009483561
State of West Virginia-828092515            City of Charleston (West Virginia)-197931681
State of Wisconsin-001778349                City of Milwaukee-004779133
State of Wyoming-832826015                 City of Cheyenne-021917273

DUNS Numbers of the United Nations Corporation and Some of Its Major Corporate Agencies

United Nations (UN)-824777304
UN Development Program (UNDP)-793511262
UN Educational, Scientific, & Cultural Organization (UNESCO)-053317819
UN World Food Program (UNWFP)-054023952
UN International Children's Education Fund (UNICEF)-017698452
UN World Health Organization (WHO)-618736326

THURSDAY NIGHTS WITH MARILYN




New post on GlobalNewsandViews


THURSDAY NIGHTS WITH MARILYN

by Teri

Join us on Thursday Feb. 7,2013 @ 8est/5pst

BLOGTALK RADIO As the book comes to it's final

chapters, Marilyn Barnewall discusses Chapter

Fifteen and High Speed Rail.    Marilyn_Barnewall_com_hdr

What is it?

Why do we need it?

How will it help in these

tough economic times?


Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.
Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
http://theglobalnewsandviews.com/2013/02/05/thursday-nights-with-marilyn/

You're not going to believe this


Subject: Fw: You're not going to believe this
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 17:22:26 -0500

You're not going to believe this



Just three weeks after I was sworn into office for a sixth term as Maricopa County Sheriff, a group of radical extremists filed a recall campaign to forcibly remove me from office.

This is very serious. These left-wing groups of agitators are the same ones who spent millions against me in last year's campaign in an effort to defeat me. Because they didn't like the outcome of that election they are now going to spend millions of dollars to force a recall election this coming fall.

So far they have raised over $1.3 million to defeat me!


These sore losers just never stop. They figure if they can force an election in an off-year they'll be able to turn out every pro-illegal immigrant voter and steal this election. We saw them do the very same thing to an Arizona State Senator just over a year ago.

It's clear that these people will go to any lengths to see me defeated and out of office. They'll resurrect all the lies, distortions and personal attacks from last year's campaign and use them against me this year.

And what is this all about really? Why do they hate me so much? It's simple: I am the only law enforcement official in this state that enforces our laws against illegal immigration. Period. Everything else they'll talk about is a deceptive smokescreen because they know they cannot win on the issue of enforcing the law.

In fact, in their statement about the recall this group claims that I don't "respect, defend or protect the rights guaranteed in the U.S. Constitution!" This, coming from the same group of people who have waged a relentless campaign against me in an effort to stop enforcing the laws! I have sworn an oath to protect and defend our United States Constitution probably more times than these clowns have pledged allegiance to our flag.

You were such an important part of my victory last year even though we faced insurmountable odds. I certainly did not plan on this recall, but I have to ask you again for your support. The fight starts now. Over the next several months I am going to be bombarded with negative attacks and lies. I must have the necessary resources to defend my record and run a winning campaign.

But I don't care what threats they make. I will never back down one inch when it comes to doing the job I was JUST elected to do. I will continue enforcing all the laws on the books no matter what the consequences.

I am going to need your help now more than ever before. This campaign starts NOW. Will you support me and my efforts today with a much-needed contribution of $860 (the maximum per couple), $430 (the maximum per person), $300, $250, $150 or even $50?

Your contribution today is critical as we face these radical extremist forces. We cannot allow a small band of thugs to thwart the will of the voters and erode the Rule of Law.

Trust me; I never dreamed I would have to come to you for a contribution again. But it's clear that I must ask you for your support and your prayers if we are going to beat our opponents. Please click here now to make a contribution.

Thank you for everything you have done and I look forward to hearing from you soon.

Very Sincerely Yours,



Sheriff Joe Arpaio
Maricopa County, Arizona

P.S. Please don't delete this email. Please make a much-needed contribution today. And please do me one more favor: Forward this email to at least five of your friends who may want to defend my efforts to enforce the law! Thank you!

Paid for by Elect Sheriff Joe Arpaio

GOVERNMENT HAS 007 LICENSE TO KILL


FOR SERIOUS STUDY AND NEED FOR CONCERN
GOVERNMENT HAS 007 LICENSE TO KILL 
Any American willing to make a stand for the Constitution and a return to the Republic could/ would be an approved target according to the rogue 'gov' and rogue (no)"Justice Dept)

EXCLUSIVE: Justice Department memo reveals legal case for drone strikes on Americans

Khaled Abdullah / Reuters file
Tribesmen examine the rubble of a building in southeastern Yemen where American teenager Abdulrahmen al-Awlaki and six suspected al-Qaida militants were killed in a U.S. drone strike on Oct. 14, 2011.  Al-Awlaki, 16, was the son of Anwar al-Awlaki, who died in a similar strike two weeks earlier.
By Michael Isikoff
National Investigative Correspondent, NBC News
A confidential Justice Department memo concludes that the U.S. government can order the killing of American citizens if they are believed to be “senior operational leaders” of al-Qaida or “an associated force” -- even if there is no intelligence indicating they are engaged in an active plot to attack the U.S.
The 16-page memo, a copy of which was obtained by NBC News, provides new details about the legal reasoning behind one of the Obama administration’s most secretive and controversial polices: its dramatically increased use of drone strikes against al-Qaida suspects, including those aimed at American citizens, such as the September 2011 strike in Yemen that killed alleged al-Qaida operatives Anwar al-Awlaki and Samir Khan. Both were U.S. citizens who had never been indicted by the U.S. government nor charged with any crimes.  
The secrecy surrounding such strikes is fast emerging as a central issue in this week’s hearing of White House counterterrorism adviser John Brennan, a key architect of the drone campaign, to be CIA director.  Brennan was the first administration official to publicly acknowledge drone strikes in a speech last year, calling them “consistent with the inherent right of self-defense.” 
In a separate talk at the Northwestern University Law School in March, Attorney General Eric Holder specifically endorsed the constitutionality of targeted killings of Americans, saying they could be justified if government officials determine the target poses  “an imminent threat of violent attack.”
But the confidential Justice Department “white paper” introduces a more expansive definition of self-defense or imminent attack than described  by Brennan or Holder in their public speeches.  It refers, for example, to what it calls a “broader concept of imminence” than actual intelligence about any ongoing plot against the U.S. homeland.    
Michael Isikoff, national investigative correspondent for NBC News, talks with Rachel Maddow about a newly obtained, confidential Department of Justice white paper that hints at the details of a secret White House memo that explains the legal justifications for targeted drone strikes that kill Americans without trial in the name of "national security".
“The condition that an operational  leader present an ‘imminent’ threat of violent attack against the United States does not require the United States to have clear evidence that a specific attack on U.S. persons and interests will take place in the immediate future,” the memo states.
Read the entire 'white paper' on drone strikes on Americans
Instead, it says,  an “informed, high-level” official of the U.S. government may determine that the targeted American  has been “recently” involved in “activities” posing a threat of a violent attack and “there is  no evidence suggesting that he has renounced or abandoned such activities.” The memo does not define “recently” or “activities.” 
As in Holder’s speech, the confidential memo lays out a three-part test that would make targeted killings of American lawful:  In addition to the suspect being an imminent threat, capture of the target must be “infeasible, and the strike must be conducted according to “law of war principles.” But the memo elaborates on some of these factors in ways that go beyond what the attorney general said publicly. For example, it states that U.S. officials may consider whether an attempted capture of a suspect  would pose an “undue risk” to U.S. personnel involved in such an operation. If so, U.S. officials could determine that the capture operation of the targeted American would not be feasible, making it lawful for the U.S. government to order a killing instead, the memo concludes.
The undated memo is entitled “Lawfulness of a Lethal Operation Directed Against a U.S. Citizen who is a Senior Operational Leader of Al Qa’ida or An Associated Force.”  It was provided to members of the Senate Intelligence and Judiciary committees in June by administration officials on the condition that it be kept confidential and  not discussed publicly.
Although not an official legal memo, the white paper was represented by administration  officials as a policy document that closely mirrors the arguments of classified memos on targeted killings by the Justice Department’s  Office of Legal Counsel, which provides authoritative legal advice to the president and all executive branch agencies. The administration has refused to turn over to Congress or release those memos publicly -- or even publicly confirm their existence. A source with access to the white paper, which is not classified, provided a copy to NBC News. 
This is a chilling document,” said Jameel Jaffer, deputy legal director of the ACLU, which is suing to obtain administration memos about the targeted killing of Americans.  “Basically, it argues that the government has the right to carry out the extrajudicial killing of an American citizen. … It recognizes some limits on the authority it sets out, but the limits are elastic and vaguely defined, and it’s easy to see how they could be manipulated.”
In particular, Jaffer said, the memo “redefines the word imminence in a way that deprives the word of its ordinary meaning.”  
A Justice Department spokeswoman declined to comment on the white paper. The spokeswoman, Tracy Schmaler, instead pointed to public speeches by what she called a “parade” of administration officials, including Brennan, Holder, former State Department Legal Adviser Harold Koh and former Defense Department General Counsel Jeh Johnson that she said outlined the “legal framework” for such operations. 
Pressure for turning over the Justice Department memos on targeted killings of Americans appears to be building on Capitol Hill amid signs that Brennan will be grilled on the subject at his confirmation hearing before the Senate Intelligence Committee on Thursday. 
On Monday, a bipartisan group of 11 senators -- led by Democrat Ron Wyden of Oregon — wrote  a letter to President Barack Obama asking him to release all Justice Department memos on the subject. While accepting that “there will clearly be circumstances in which the president has the authority to use lethal force” against Americans who take up arms against the country,  it said, “It is vitally important ... for Congress and the American public to have a full understanding of how  the executive branch interprets the limits and boundaries of this authority.”
Anticipating domestic boom, colleges rev up drone piloting programs
The completeness of the administration’s public accounts of its legal arguments was also sharply criticized last month by U.S. Judge Colleen McMahon in response to a  lawsuit brought by the New York Times and the ACLU seeking access to the Justice Department memos on drone strikes targeting Americans under the Freedom of Information Act.  McMahon, describing herself as being caught in a “veritable Catch-22,”  said she was unable to order the release of the documents given “the thicket of laws and precedents that effectively allow the executive branch of our government to proclaim as perfectly lawful certain actions that seem on their face incompatible with our Constitution and laws while keeping the reasons for the conclusion a secret.”
In her ruling, McMahon noted that administration officials “had engaged in public discussion of the legality of targeted killing, even of citizens.” But, she wrote, they have done so “in cryptic and imprecise ways, generally without citing … any statute or court decision that justifies its conclusions.”
In one passage in Holder’s speech at Northwestern in March,  he alluded – without spelling out—that there might be circumstances where the president might order attacks against American citizens without specific knowledge of when or where an attack against the U.S. might take place.
“The Constitution does not  require the president to delay action until some theoretical end-stage of planning, when the precise time, place and manner of an attack become clear,”  he said.
But his speech did not contain the additional language in the white paper suggesting that no active intelligence about a specif ic attack is needed to justify a targeted strike. Similarly, Holder said in his speech that targeted killings of Americans can be justified  if “capture is not feasible.” But he did not include language in the white paper saying that an operation might not be feasible “if it could not be physically effectuated during the relevant window of opportunity or if the relevant country (where the target is located) were to decline to consent to a capture operation.” The speech also made no reference to the risk that might be posed to U.S. forces seeking to capture a target, as was  mentioned in the white paper. 
The white paper also includes a more extensive discussion of why targeted strikes against Americans does not violate constitutional protections afforded American citizens as well as   a U.S. law that criminalizes the killing of U.S. nationals overseas.
It  also discusses why such targeted killings would not be a war crime or violate a U.S. executive order banning assassinations.
 “A lawful killing in self-defense is not an assassination,” the white paper reads. “In the Department’s view, a lethal operation conducted against a U.S. citizen whose conduct poses an imminent threat of violent attack against the United States would be a legitimate act of national self-defense that would not violate the assassination ban. Similarly,  the use of lethal force, consistent with the laws of war, against an individual who is a legitimate military target would be lawful and would not violate the assassination ban.”
More from Open Channel:



Israel and Iran: A love story?

EXTREME CAUTION, BANKSTER ALERT!


Today a friend called to say that when his wife went down to their bank, Nashville Bank in Tenn. to renew the equity line of credit on their home she came home and told him to go up to the bank and sign the papers. His name has never been on the loan so he went to the bank to straighten everything out. When he got there and he was given the papers his wife had signed he found that on the bottom of every page in BOLD type it said that:

BY SIGNING THIS AGREEMENT YOU WAIVE YOUR RIGHT TO A JURY TRIAL IN REGARD TO ANY AND ALL EVENTS AND OR CLAIMS WHICH MAY ARISE FROM IT

Fortunately my friend is far to savvy to have fallen for that. He threw a fit and demanded the bank explain what they thought they were trying to pull. The loan officer called the main branch and then said, well we could take that off of there....( DUH! )
DO NOT UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES SIGN ANY DOCUMENT WITH EVEN SIMILAR LANGUAGE TO THAT ON IT. By signing that agreement they would have been waiving all their rights to due process under the law and our Constitution. If the smaller banks like Nashville Bank are attempting this kind of entrapment you can bet the BIG BANKS LED THE WAY!
If you have inadvertently signed such a document in the last three days get your butt back down to the  bank and exercise your three day right to rescission!
This is unconscionable and cannot be tolerated. If the fraudster banks can get you to renew your loans and or mortgages with language like that in the documents they have carte blanche ability to STEAL EVERYTHING YOU HAVE and you have NO POWER TO STOP THEM AND NO RECOURSE AFTERWARD!


--
Teri

"A nation...cannot survive treason from within...the traitor ...wears the face of his victims,...and he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation—he works secretly...he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to be feared......." Cicero, 42 B.C.E.

HOSPITAL BILL - Who is gonna to pay?


HOSPITAL BILL

A man suffered a serious heart attack while shopping in a store.

The store clerk called 911 when she saw him collapse to the floor.

The paramedics rushed the man to the nearest hospital where he had emergency heart bypass surgery.   

He awakened from the surgery to find himself in the care of nuns at the Catholic Hospital.

A nun was seated next to his bed holding a clipboard loaded with several forms, and a pen. She asked him how he was going to pay for his treatment.  "Do you have health insurance?" she asked.

He replied in a raspy voice, "No health insurance." 

The nun asked, "Do you have money in the bank?"  He replied, "No money in the bank."

Do you have a relative who could help you with the payments?" asked the irritated nun. He said, "I only have a spinster sister, and she's a nun."  

The nun became agitated and announced loudly, "Nuns are not spinsters!   Nuns are married to God."  

The patient replied....
"Perfect.   Send the bill to my brother-in-law."




 

Rockefeller Brother Fund: We’re Buying Off Evangelicals, Mayors, Governors… For The Earth


The Rumor Mill News Reading Room 

Rockefeller Brother Fund: We’re Buying Off Evangelicals, Mayors, Governors… For The Earth
Posted By: Susoni [Send E-Mail]
Date: Tuesday, 5-Feb-2013 15:44:56

In its 2010 review of grants extended from 2005 to 2010, the Rockefeller Brothers Fund admits to buying off (quite literally) so-called “non-green voices”- meaning people outside the environmental community- to sell man-made climate change doctrine to their respective communities.
“(…) foundation dollars extended to support these non-green voices have grown dramatically (…). The RBF has supported “allied voices for climate action” that include businesses, investors, evangelicals, farmers, sportsmen, labor, military leaders, national security hawks, veterans, youth, and governors and mayors.”
This is an actual admission by the Rockefeller Brothers Fund of sustained funding for specific segments to promote the “green” cause. In the document we read that both religious leaders and state/local politicians have been subsidized into selling the myth of man made global warming The report goes on to say that:
rockefeller_bro1
“Foundations, including the RBF, have played a significant role in building the capacity of these groups to organize their base members, communicate publicly about their interest in climate solutions, and advocate for policies that will address climate change domestically and internationally. In addition to its direct financial support of these individual groups, the Fund has also provided technical assistance for strategic development, communications planning, and advocacy training.”
Specifically mentioning the National Board of Governors as beneficiaries, we read:
“Governors and mayors have proven to be very effective advocates for climate change solutions domestically and internationally. Across America, states and localities are developing innovative climate programs and serving as laboratories for pioneering approaches. Many have launched climate initiatives in their cities and states and have seen the economic benefits of doing so.”
The review also describes in some detail how the Fund from 1984 onward has poured bucket loads of cash into climate change propaganda-efforts, including strengthening the implementation of Agenda 21
Snip
Despite the described “erosion of public trust” the Rockefeller’s at the same time marvel at the results of their grant-making schemes from 2005 to 2010:
“As philanthropic giving has grown over the past several years, with it have grown new organizations, new alliances, and new campaigns. Just a few short years ago, climate change was addressed by a small subset of the environmental movement. It is fair to say that the issue now has a growing movement of its own. Powerful voices from business, faith, national security, youth, labor, and agricultural groups have joined the fight for robust climate change policy.”
To illustrate that this buying off on a mass scale of so-called “non-green voices” by the Rockefellers is far from an incidental funding-program, we know that the Rockefeller Foundation also actively engaged celebrity-journalists. As far back as the mid seventies the Foundation has been busy buying off reporters and funding media-empires into existence. Even then “climate change” was actively being promoted as a tragic result of human meddling in the affairs of mother earth. Genetically engineered food was already being pushed as the cure to remedy all ills. The 1974 Rockefeller Foundation journal reports:
“Several science editors were asked to participate in Foundation meetings on climate change, food production and interstate conflict, genetic resistance in plants to pests, and aquaculture. Stories appeared subsequently on the front page of The New York Times, and the Associated Press carried substantial stories which were widely used. In each instance, the writers were introduced to our program officers and encouraged to use them as resource people. (Officers are now, in fact, being called on by journalists, particularly in areas of current high news interest such as food production, population problems, environmental issues, and the arts.).”
On several occasions, and in different publications spread throughout its long and sordid past, the Rockefeller Foundation openly brags using media- figureheads for their own purposes. In none of these instances does the RF mention any problem encountered with any of the media moguls they contacted. In the 1974 yearly report, Bill Moyers is mentioned as one of the beneficiaries of information disseminated by the Foundation.
“In preparing its remarkable 25-part series on the world food situation, the New York Times reporters have become acquainted and have established fruitful ongoing relationships with a good many of our officers. Our staff have provided substantial information and further contacts for Bill Moyers in his television series dealing with the problems of global interdependence. These are only a few of the many productive new relationships we have established with representatives of the mass media.”
Another arm of the octopus, the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) put out a document in 2009 describing specific tricks used by the Fund to reach congregations unwilling to go along with the UN’s population control programs:
“UNFPA has found that leaders of faith ‐ and interfaith ‐ based organizations are open to discussing reproductive health, if issues are addressed with care and sensitivity.”
These “agents of change” should also be recruited to protect and promote the overall agenda “through countering misinformation campaigns and building social support within the governments for the ICPD (International Conference on Population and Development).”
The ultimate goal of these engagement efforts is clearly described:
“Create a conducive socio‐cultural environment (impacting on behaviour, attitudes and practices) to ultimately promote and mobilize key communities towards achieving the goals of the ICPD PoA (International Conference on Population and Development Programme of Action) and the MDGs (Millennium Development Goals).”
“The National Religious Partnership on the Environment is an alliance of the US Catholic Conference, Coalition on Environment and Jewish Life, National Council of Churches, and the Evangelical Environmental Network that serves more than 100 million Americans.”
Another UN front, called the Interfaith Partnership for the Environment was admittedly founded in the mid 1980s to, as the UNEP website teaches, “… inform North American congregations about the serious environmental problems facing life on earth.”
The UNFPA, as the enforcement arm of the overall infrastructure, joined with their brother- and sister-agencies in the UN to encircle the world’s religions reminiscent of a pack of hungry wolves:
So much more on link:
http://www.thedailysheeple.com/rockefeller-brother-fund-were-buying-off-evangelicals-mayors-governors-for-the-earth_022013

What is the REAL AGENDA of "Poofness"? - Your input requested

This AWARENESS BLOG by your comments has exposed a number of false gurus like the "Packie kid" Casper. Then we have this Tim Turner character and etc., etc..

NOW I NEED YOUR HELP ON THIS NEW CANDIDATE.

What is the REAL AGENDA of "Poofness"? Who is he really working for?

Your comments are welcome.

FLUORIDEGATE: An American Tragedy


San Diego just started fluoridating water last year! Many people tried to stop it, but the City Council rammed it through. Fortunately, the water in Carlsbad is still OK.
_______________________________________
FLUORIDEGATE:  An American Tragedy
Published on Jan 25, 2013
WWW.FLUORIDEGATE.ORG
FLUORIDEGATE AN AMERICAN TRAGEDY (1:05:05)
A DOCUMENTARY FILM. By Dr. David Kennedy

FLUORIDEGATE the movie is a new documentary film that reveals the tragedy of how the United States government, industry, and trade associations protect and promote a policy known to cause harm to our country and especially small children, who suffer more than any other segment of the population.
While the basis of their motivation remains uncertain, the outcome is crystal clear: it is destroying our nation.

Additional information Infants and brain health video by Dr. Paul Connett: http://youtu.be/jSBZ2BTx-YQ





WHY must it come to WAR?


WHY must it come to WAR? 

We have our Declaration of Independence don't we?  We have our Bill of Rights don't we?  And our Constitution, of course, the original organic constitution before 1791 that incorporated it, right?

So... why do we have to go to WAR …why can’t We…the people come together and arrest the insurrectionists?  Congress is as corrupt as the executive branch. They're all usurpers of our Republic and Bill of Rights, and we know their crimes, which are many. Why aren't  Grand Juries of the people being put together, along with the  Provo Marshall to  make arrests? 
There are so many people studying constitutional law, why aren't these people putting forth judgments that the lawful constitutional Sheriffs can enforce? 

I know it isn't as simple as it sounds, but it can be done if people truly want to be free.  Civil War sounds like another manipulation of the people towards the global control of America, just as the first civil war was used to capture the economy of America and enslave the people , it too was manipulated to their gain. Will we ever learn from history and stop the recycling of their continued agenda for global control?

No borders, world peace, debt elimination, new technologies, and all at what cost?  Our Sovereignty?   Nothing is free, there's always a trade-off. Why are the only two options, Global Control or Civil War being offered?  Both of these options are on the far end of the spectrum and no viable solution to be found in either, but more destruction. 

America has turned its back on Almighty God and a return to His Kingdom is never offered as a viable solution, why?  We are a blighted, degraded, society that is in societal decay and never is there a mention of a return to what made this country respected around the world, biblical principles and values. Again, why?

There is so much talk about the Luciferians, Satanists and their alter sacrifices, but never mention of Almighty God or His Son.  There is so much talk of Ascension and Light Workers, and Aliens, and that all religions will be gone, really?  God created man in HIs image and to fellowship/worship Him, it is in our DNA, so, if all religions will be gone, who will we be programmed to worship?  Especially when the world is full of satanic worshiping now, and many are worshipping satan and without even realizing they are.  How is it freedom if “all religions” will be gone, who hands down this edict, the light workers via the golden age?  What I’m saying isn’t about what God a person chooses to serve or not, but the RIGHT to do so, whether it is now or in the New World Order’s Golden Age.  The Utopia spewing all over the web to lull people into the greatest deception ever straight from the last book is being played out and many are in a strong delusion.  This IS what’s destroying America from within. The reality of what is happening is the numerous deceptions that have been created for the people to worship, whether it is the ascended masters, ET’s, mother earth, etc. etc. etc.

Look around people...truly look around...seek truth in all things...not just the quickest solution of the moment, which is what has gotten us to this point in history once again.

There is a solution and it doesn't have to be Global Control or Civil War, there is something in-between, its called, “Truth”, and it is what was given to us by our Creator, Almighty God. The Ten Commandments, later summed up in the Two Greatest Commandments so we knew how to first love God, and second love one another as we do ourselves, and then later in America’s history He gave us our De Jure Republic of, by, and for the people.  It is ours, but we continue to trample on it and ignore it's existence because we are so busy whoring after their lies and all the sensationalism of the media.  Our de jure republic of self-governance of, by, and for the people is for a virtuous people, and if we cannot find our virtue then America, as we that are older have known it, will cease to exist for our children and grandchildren.

Many are aware of all the agendas being implemented towards our destruction, but what is being done in our local communities to kick the local “sustainable development” takeover out?  That is where it begins?  To eat an elephant you do so "one bite at a time", our local communities is where we start eating away at that elephant.  That is where we have the greatest power.  Many that are doing what they are doing in this freedom movement are doing so either to deliberately distract the people from their local communities or they are doing so blindly not seeking real viable solutions founded in TRUTH because they are part of the system of destruction.  This battle is between principalities and powers, good and evil, truth and deception, which do you serve?
I apologize if I've offended anyone, it is not my intention, but sometimes things just have to be said and they will "resonate" with those to whom this was intended. <><


A Critical Look at Sandy Hook from Thrive Filmmaker, Foster Gamble


 From Thrive Filmmaker, Foster Gamble


Dear Thrive Movement,

I miss being in touch more with all of you in this amazing Thrive network!

Now that it's a New Year and the holidays are behind us, I will be sharing reflections and my interpretation of the news on my blog in the coming months.  

One of the most critical stories to take a deeper look at currently is Sandy Hook

As I see it, the powers that be are using the tragedy to further an agenda for Global Domination. It is up to each of us to ensure that our grief and anger are not manipulated to further erode our fundamental human rights. 

I am committed to non-violation and that includes non-violence except in true self-defense. Our ability to defend ourselves against authoritarian regimes is what the second amendment was written to ensure. It is not something I am willing to relinquish. 

In my most recent blog article, I unpack the facts around the "gun control" debate and pharmaceutical drugs that play a role in the surge of violent attacks.

This is the analysis that you won't get in mainstream media and is critical to protecting us from manipulation and toxic pharmaceuticals as well as to understanding the role that an armed citizenry - or an unarmed citizenry - has played throughout history.

Please check out my article on Sandy Hook, share it with your friends, and let me know your thoughts by commenting at the bottom of the page.

 
Sincerely, 
Foster Gamble
Host & Creator of THRIVE


  
      Like us on Facebook     Visit our blog     Follow us on Twitter    

Panetta to testify to the Senate on Benghazi attack


RT Headline: Panetta to testify to the Senate on Benghazi attack

Posted on by Jean

Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and Joint Chiefs of Staff chairman General Martin Dempsey will testify before the Senate Armed Services Committee Thursday regarding the September 2012 attack on the US Consulate in Benghazi, Libya. The attack resulted in the deaths of four Americans, and has been a source of pressure from the Republican Party on the Obama administration regarding security. Then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton testified on the matter in January. It could be Panetta’s last time to give testimony before the Senate, as he will soon leave his post.