Monday, February 11, 2013

Revitalization of the State Militias


From: Oath Keepers
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2013 5:11 AM
Subject: Nelson Hultberg Reviews Edwin Vieira's "The Sword And Sovereignty"

You are receiving this message because you are a registered member of Oath Keepers. Don't forget to add contact@oathkeepers.org to your address book so we'll be sure to land in your inbox!

You may unsubscribe if you no longer wish to receive our emails.

Nelson Hultberg Reviews Dr. Edwin Vieira's
The
Sword And Sovereignty




Revitalization of the State Militias
A Review of Edwin Vieira's The Sword And Sovereignty

by Nelson Hultberg
On April 19, 1775, the battles of Lexington and Concord on the outskirts of Boston ignited the conflict that led to the most momentous political event of man's history - the Declaration of Independence and the birth of America. In the early morning hours of that day, a command of British troops was dispatched from Boston to search out and confiscate stores of militia weapons and supplies at Concord. On the way they confronted a small and unimposing band of armed American militia at Lexington. The British Major John Pitcairn shouted out, "Ye villains, ye Rebels, disperse; damn you, disperse! Lay down your arms!"

The American militia were under the command of Captain, John Parker; and their orders were to remain non-antagonistic to the British. They were outnumbered by almost ten to one. So why didn't they lay down their arms when ordered to do so? "Because," says constitutional scholar Edwin Vieira, "free men with a duty to keep and bear arms never willingly lay down their arms. And at Lexington, none of them did." The heroic militia Captain John Parker warned his men, "if they mean to have a war let it begin here." And begin it did.

Importance of the State Militias

With his newest book,The Sword and Sovereignty, Edwin Vieira, Jr., has given us a magisterial work that meticulously documents the history of the early American Militias and why similar units must be revitalized today if we are to adequately confront our disintegration as a society and restore the republic that the Founders gave us. It is a book that will profoundly shock 98 percent of Americans. It is so overpowering in its legal logic and constitutional veracity that the intellectuality of Cicero and Plutarch comes to mind as one reads the prose. It is not a book that can be read lightly; it demands a tolerance for legal thought and abstract conceptualization.

But for those "men of the mind" who understand the importance of ideas in the unfolding of history, the effort will be most rewarding. You will be shown an entirely new way of seeing things regarding guns, militia, the Second Amendment, homeland security, how they intertwine, and how they have been grossly misrepresented by quisling, pseudo-experts of the establishment.For the first 125 years of our history, the "Militia of the several States" was a highly honored institution that played a vital role in preserving the concept of federalism upon which our system of freedom depends. This ended with the Militia Act of 1903, which shifted the "Militia of the several States" into National Guard units under the auspices of the national military. State and local control was eliminated.

In addition, as Vieira tells us, over the past century decades "of disuse, misuse, and abuse have so thoroughly muddled the meaning of 'Militia' in contemporary American political discourse that the word is hardly ever encountered except as invective, usually well-freighted with vituperative adjectives such as 'extremist' and 'violent', broadcast by the enemies of constitutional government (and their dupes and other 'useful idiots') for the purpose of intimidating into silence the people they intend to oppress as soon as the vast majority of Americans has been thoroughly disarmed through one form of 'gun control' or another."

Anybody today with a modicum of brains can see that our nation is being transformed into a "first-class police state." Homeland Security and Washington's outrageous "Patriot Acts" are Alice in Wonderland institutions that have taken us a giant step down the path to Orwell's nightmare. Our military-industrial complex grows exponentially. The Federal Government has become a Godzilla of ugliness and menace. Our Congressmen are Machiavellian schemers wallowing in sophistic mazes and treason to truth.

Vieira's answer to this pernicious evolution is startling. As with all big thinkers in history, he asks us (like Steve Jobs did to his comrades at Apple) to "Think Different!" He maintains that America cannot be saved unless she revitalizes her original concept of the "Militia of the several States."
The Sword and Sovereignty explains - in 1,945 pages of text and 305 pages of appendixes, tables, and notes - why this must be done and how to constitutionally do it. Magisterial scholarship is putting it mildly.

History and Restoration of the Militias

The book explores the legal history of the pre-constitutional Militia statutes of colonial times to demonstrate that armed and well-regulated Militias formed on the state level are what the Founders intended for the provision of "homeland security." The monstrosity of today's centralized Homeland Security Department in Washington is not needed; a revival of the "Militia of the several States" and unequivocal acknowledgement of the people's right to bear arms will give us everything we require. This will decentralize "security" in the country and help greatly to check the ominous peril of the military-industrial complex.

Many Americans will perceive this as a quixotic attempt to turn back the clock and revive a hopeless anachronism that prevailed in the era of flintlock muskets and tri-cornered caps. Not so. Vieira demonstrates his points legally with the same overpowering logic that Ludwig von Mises puts forth economically in Human
Action
. Mises was relentless in rational destructions of the socialists' sinister fallacies. So too is Vieira in his dismantling of the arguments of today's collectivist control freaks.After he traces the legal history of pre-constitutional Militia and gun statutes, he then lays out seventeen fundamental principles (in seventeen chapters) to define how the constitutional structure and service of a revitalized "Militia of the several States" would be validated. When one is done reading these seventeen chapters, he sees clearly that a revitalization of the state Militias is constitutionally legitimate and workable in the modern day. Whether or not they can be revived is, of course, an open question. There is huge opposition in all establishment schools, bureaucracies, and courts to such a radical restructuring of society's power relationships. But Vieira demonstrates in compelling fashion why and how it can be done if Americans still have the will.

One of the most profound parts of the book is its explanation in Chapter One of the present day fallacy of "judicial supremacy," showing how the Supreme Court is not the ultimate judge of "what the law is." Congress stands above the Court and may stipulate how the Judges are to interpret the laws. But most importantly, the People stand above Congress, for they are the creators of Congress via the Constitution. WE THE PEOPLE rule in America, not congressional despots and judicial oligarchs.

As the famous eighteenth century jurist, Sir William Blackstone, observed in
Commentaries on the Laws of England, "whenever a question arises between the society at large and any magistrate vested with powers originally delegated by that society, it must be decided by the voice of the society itself: there is not upon earth any other tribunal to resort to."Thus the salvation of America must come with reassertion of the citizens' fundamental right to decide the ultimate issues of their lives. Through political techniques such as nullification on the part of juries and state governments the overweening excesses of today's Federal Government and its bureaucratic thugs can be brought to heel.


It is important to understand that Vieira is NOT proposing "private" Militias, the likes of which we have seen in recent years from racial supremacy groups and neo-Nazi extremists. What Vieira is proposing is the revitalization of governmentally created and legitimized Militia units among the states that our Constitution calls irrevocably for. These will be legislated and regulated by the state governments. They will be official government bodies in all the towns and cities of the land, not rogue factions that operate from wilderness hideouts. The leftist establishment media will, no doubt, attempt to portray Vieira's plan as the promotion of wilderness wackos reveling in burning crosses and white sheets; but hopefully learned Americans will recognize such smear tactics as the inexcusable liberal vacuity that it is.
Benefits of Militia Restoration

There are so many benefits to such a revitalization. As Vieira writes, "Today, at every level of the federal system, America is woefully unprepared to deal effectively with hurricanes, tornados, floods, earthquakes, and other natural disasters; with major industrial accidents, such as leakages from offshore oil-drilling rigs or meltdowns of nuclear power plants; with epidemics and pandemics; with crop failures and possibly attendant famines; with invasions through the
Volkerwanderung of illegal immigration; with economic breakdowns, and in particular a collapse of this country's monetary and banking systems; and with the myriad threats posed by real terrorism. '[W]ell regulated Militia', however, not only could deal with the consequences of such events, but also could forefend many of them."In addition, the Militia can be used to investigate the constitutionality of the laws that they execute, they can supervise honest elections, they can help to repel invasions, they can help local police, they can be very instrumental in defeating the machinations of globalism, etc.

Another crucial point to grasp is that the revitalized Militia will not be in anyway a part of the regular military, nor will they be under the thumb of Congress. This is the way the Constitution established them in the beginning, and this is the way they must be revived. They will be institutions of unity and defense at the state government level. Their revival will begin the vital process of restoring "federalism."

Owning Guns Not Enough

Vieira explains that the individual right to bear arms as a defense against tyranny will not suffice in and of itself. "For, confronted by usurpers and tyrants deploying 'standing armies' and para-militarized police forces, or by hordes of foreign invaders, armed individuals in isolation or in small groups would likely prove feckless."In other words, just the right to bear arms is not enough. What is necessary is the establishment of collective, coordinated state Militias. This is why the Second Amendment says, "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."The pre-constitutional colonial and state statutes during the 150 years leading up to 1787, demonstrate irrefutably that Militias organized on the state and local levels were held by the patriots of the era to be vital for the defense of freedom and order in the republic. The modern day is no different; in fact, such institutions are even more vital. Upon this right of individual and local self-defense, there can be no compromise.

Most libertarians and conservatives are aware of the recent testimony in front of Congress by Suzanna Hupp regarding our right to bear arms. She was one of the victims of the tragic Luby's massacre in Killeen, Texas in 1991 and lost both her parents to the gun-toting madman. She testified to our Washington solons that if she had been allowed to carry the gun she owned in her purse, she would have been able to kill the madman and would have saved numerous lives including her parents.
Then she topped off her heroic testimony with these searing words as she stared Senator Charles Schumer and his imperious cronies right in the eyes: "I am sitting here getting more and more fed up with all of this talk about these pieces of machinery having no legitimate sporting purpose, no legitimate hunting purpose. People, that is not the point of the Second Amendment. The Second Amendment is not about duck hunting....It is about our rights, all of our rights to be able to protect ourselves from all of you guys up there."

How to Bring About the Revitalization

The Militias of early America in both pre and post Constitution eras were basically
compulsory institutions. The states mandated that all able-bodied men were subject to membership and duty. In other words the states had the right to impress citizens into the Militia. This, of course, will not be acceptable to the libertarian community of the modern day. So if the Militias are to be revived, they will have to be voluntarily joined as Independent Militia Companies formed by the state governments. And this is the procedure that Vieira advocates. Independent Militia Companies must spring up under the auspices of the state governments via volunteers.Vieira goes into detail, however, explaining how the early American viewpoint was that membership in the Militias had to be compulsory, and that eventually they should be formed into such units as Americans are educated in this upcoming century toward their duties as well as their rights 

in maintaining a free republic. He makes a very passionate case for regaining the "all for one and one for all" spirit that animated early Americans' willingness to tolerate compulsory membership in their local Militias. Being a political libertarian, I would disagree on this point and rely permanently on voluntary units as the undergirding structure to revitalization. The Militias might not work as efficiently, and their memberships might not be spread as evenly among all citizens, but they will be a lot safer units of government under volunteer recruitment policies.The Founders understood the power lusting nature of man and the necessity for citizens to be armed and organized at all times as protection from their rulers. Suzanna Hupp understands this. Edwin Vieira understands it. And now we as a people must come to realize it. Our right to bear arms has nothing to do with duck hunting. State Militias have nothing to do with wilderness wackos.

"The struggle that has been thrust upon Americans," writes Vieira, "is not one to
preserve the uniquely American way of life, but to restore it." The plague of factions and collectivist usurpers have decimated the republic. "Today, the true America exists only as fleeting, dissipating shadows of her former self."
The Sword and Sovereignty's message will go a long way toward restoring that resplendent America we lost. It is a profoundly patriotic work of powerful impact that can direct our intelligentsia toward a rediscovery of our real roots. Any thinking man or woman today who fears for America's survival needs to tackle this book. It is available in CD format at
.
Nelson Hultberg * February 10 2013
-
Nelson Hultberg is a freelance writer in Dallas, Texas and the Director of Americans for a Free Republic www.afr.org. His articles have appeared in such publications as the
Dallas Morning News, The American Conservative, Insight, The Freeman, and
Liberty, as well as on numerous Internet sites such as The Daily Bell, Financial Sense, and Safe Haven. He is also the author of
The Golden Mean: Libertarian Politics, Conservative Values to be released in March of 2013. Email him at: nelshultberg@aol.com
-
Your comments are welcome under this article at Oath Keepers' national website:



-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SUPPORT OUR BILLBOARD CAMPAIGN
Placing billboards outside of military bases to remind service members of their oath

SUPPORT OUR LIBERTY TOUR
Free music concerts for the troops, with direct outreach to them about their oath






You do not need to be prior service to join Oath Keepers. All Patriotic Citizens are invited to join as an Associate Member. 
 

Please donate and support Oath Keepers mission, every little bit helps!



Support Operation Sleeping Giant, Join Oath Keepers and get involved.

Operation Sleeping Giant

Join Oath Keepers



Oath Keepers is growing FAST, but like General Patton, we are outpacing our own supply lines. Your donations are "fuel" for our advance! If you would like to support the Oath Keepers vital mission to teach the current serving about their oath and about the Constitution so they will stand firm and do what is right, and our second mission to remind veterans of their oath and obligations.:

Please click the PayPal image below to donate. 
 


If you would like to mail your donation:

Make checks payable to: OathKeepers

Mail to:
Oath Keepers
5130 S. Fort Apache suite 215
Las Vegas, NV 89148 


This email was sent from an unmonitored email address. If you wish to contact us, please use the contact form on the contact page of our website.

Gold Falls

February 11, 2013
Gold Falls as Investors Await G-7 Announcement on Currency Devaluation
Gold prices tumbled on the New York Spot Market in morning trading as investors moved to the sidelines to await news from the G-7 summit on the looming currency wars. A number of nations, including the U.S., Japan and China, have adopted policies which devalue their currencies to bolster their economies. The so-called G-7 nations are reportedly discussing a commitment to "market-determined" exchanges rates.

Solve for X Planetary Resources Asteroid Mining

More for ya – maybe it is time to ask WHY?

New post on Americannationalmilitia.com



More for ya – maybe it is time to ask WHY?

by Drake
                 WHY?
         Is it time to rise up?
       Is this enough or not?
       In a few more days many of these things will change.
       I suggest patience, after all we are dealing with government...
you know...hurry up an wait.
       The WAIT CLUB is still there...hehehe
         ~ Drake
There is a correction in the LINKS DOC SENT EARLIER TODAY in the first paragraph it should say "1.626 MILLION rounds of hollow point ammunition purchased and stock piled by Homeland Security" not 1.626 MILLION Smart Meters
CONTRIBUTOR: RussiaToday. The Fourth Amendment no longer means what you once thought it did: A new report reveals that the government has shrugged off concerns over the alleged constitutional infringements of its own citizens near international crossings. An internal review of the US Department of Homeland Security’s procedures regarding the suspicionless...
-------------------
The Fema Camp Bill Is Back!CONTRIBUTOR: BARRACUDA. Source: Lee Rogers, BlacklistedNews.com It looks as if Representative Alcee Hastings a Democrat from Florida has decided to reintroduce his FEMA Camp bill. A few years ago I was the first person to write an article about this awful piece of legislation. Fortunately, I was successful in exposing it to...
------------------
Wired: Constitution-Free Zone Upheld - Do You Live In A Place Where You Are No Longer Free?CONTRIBUTOR: Live Free or Die. According to this breaking story from Wired, the Department of Homeland Security's 'Watchdog' has given the OK for the 'suspicionless' seizure of electronic devices along the borders of America. According to the map below from the ACLU, this includes a 100 mile perimeter along the entire border of the United...
-----------------
Drake | February 11, 2013 at 10:12 am | Categories: News | URL: http://wp.me/p2tRr3-Hq

The brutal cost of the US drug war


Subject: The brutal cost of the US drug war

Ronald

Grow a plant, go to jail.

This insane prohibition
of cannabis and other
plants have created a
lucrative market for
criminals.

Here's the cost one country
pays.

Video


- Brasscheck

P.S. Please share Brasscheck TV e-mails and videos with friends and colleagues.

That's how we grow. Thanks.

================================

Visit out partner sites:

The Real Food Channel: http://RealFoodChannel.com The truth about the food you eat

Real Econ TV: http://RealEconTV.com
Financial news without the big bank baloney

Jazz on the Tube: http://JazzontheTube.com Take a jazz break

================================
Brasscheck TV
2380 California St.
San Francisco, CA 94115

To unsubscribe or change subscriber options visit:

HISTORY OF BANKING FRAUD AS IT RELATES TO GLOBAL ECONOMIC EVENTS, 1871-TODAY


The Rumor Mill News Reading Room 

HISTORY OF BANKING FRAUD AS IT RELATES TO GLOBAL ECONOMIC EVENTS, 1871-TODAY
Posted By: NaturalWisdom
Date: Monday, 11-Feb-2013 12:30:34

A majority of these points about the global economy have been revealed and posted previously on RMN, but bear repeating here.
Taking it back to the beginning: talking points
Source: Removing the Shackles
Thursday, 7 February 2013
Talking Points
1. The ACT of 1871 made the United States a corporation within the District of Columbia.
2. In 1913 the US Federal Reserve Act was introduced and took control of Money Creation from the Congress and US Treasury. The Federal Reserve is a private bank and is owned by foreign investors not Americans. There are only a few central banks that are not part of the Private Federal Reserve System, those being Iran, Cuba and North Korea.
3. The stock market crash of 1929 was engineered by the big banks. Most of them pulled out of the market prior the crash and then came back and bought up shares at pennies on the dollar. This was the second collapse of the world economy.
 New  0  0  0  0

Pope Benedict Resigns - Vatican Confirms



Pope Benedict Resigns - Vatican Confirms

The Pope is to become the first since 1415 to step down as leader of the Catholic Church.     4:20 pm UK, Monday 11 February 2013




IS THE POPE SHOWN BELOW TO BE THE NEXT - AND LAST - POPE - THE POPE OF THE ANTI-CHRIST NEW WORLD ORDER GOVERNMENT?


Biographical notes
[Updated: 26.10.2012]

Notice: the biographical notes are only a working instrument for the press, for the exclusive use of accredited journalists.


TURKSON Card. Peter Kodwo Appiah


Cardinal Peter Kodwo Appiah Turkson, President of the Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace,  Archbishop emeritus of Cape Coast (Ghana), was born on 11 October 1948 in Wassaw Nsuta, Ghana. 
He was ordained for the Diocese of Cape Coast on 20 July 1975 and holds a doctorate in Sacred Scripture from the Pontifical Biblical Institute, Rome.
From 1975-1976 and 1980-1981 he served as staff member at St Theresa’s Minor Seminary, and from 1981-1987 as staff member at St Peter’s Major Seminary. 
On 6 October 1992 he was appointed Archbishop of Cape Coast and was ordained on 27 March 1993.
He was President of the Ghana Catholic Bishops’ Conference (1997-2005) and member of the Pontifical Commission for Methodist-Catholic Dialogue; Chancellor of the Catholic University College of Ghana; member of the National Sustainable Development, Ministry of Environment; member of the Board of Directors of the Central Regional Development Committee and treasurer of the Symposium of Episcopal Conferences of Africa and Madagascar (SECAM).
Attended the Special Assembly for Africa of the Synod of Bishops, Vatican City, April 10 to May 8, 1994; the 9th Ordinary General Assembly of the World Synod of Bishops, Vatican City, October 2 to 29, 1994; the 11th  Ordinary General Assembly of the Synod of Bishops, Vatican City, October 2 to 23, 2005 and the 12th Ordinary General Assembly of the Synod of Bishops, Vatican City, October 5 to 26, 2008. General Relator of the 2nd Special Assembly for Africa of the Synod of Bishops, "The Church in Africa, at the Service of Reconciliation, Justice and Peace. 'You are the salt of the earth, ... you are the light of the world'" (4-25 October 2009).
On 24 October 2009 he was nominated President of the Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace.
Created and proclaimed Cardinal by John Paul II in the Consistory of 21 October 2003, of the Title of S. Liborio (St. Liborius).

Member of:

  • Congregation: for the Doctrine of the Faith; for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments; for the Evangelization of Peoples; for Catholic Education;
  • Pontifical Councils: for Promoting Christian Unity; Cor Unum;
  • Pontifical Committee for International Eucharistic Congresses;
  • XIII Ordinary Council of the Secretariat General of the Synod of Bishops;
  • II Special Council for Africa of the General Secretariat of the Synod of Bishops.


Return to:
List of Cardinals in alphabetical order
Statistics

Index Holy See Press Office
  
[EnglishFrenchGermanItalianPortugueseSpanish]


Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote in Urgent National Poll.


Monday February 11, 2013
Search Newsmax


Should the federal government regulate guns of any type?

Yes, it should
290,024(28%)

No, it should not
725,009(71%)

Should Congress ban semi-automatic weapons?

Yes, it should
231,810(22%)

No, it should not
790,938(77%)

If Congress does not act, should President Obama use an executive order to ban or strictly control the sale of semi-automatic weapons?

Yes, he should
210,778(20%)

No, he should not
810,625(79%)

Do you agree that the Second Amendment gives citizens the right to own and bear guns without infringement?

Yes, I agree
829,613(81%)

No, I don't agree
192,485(18%)


Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com
http://www.newsmax.com/surveys/Results/id/64#ixzz2KbTM3pZG
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!

Mainstream Media Remains Silent on Kurt Haskell False Flag Testimony - should we be surprised?!


Mainstream Media Remains Silent on Kurt Haskell False Flag Testimony - should we be surprised?!
By JG Vibes
theintelhub.com
February 11, 2013

Tonight on the Bob Tuskin Radio Show we will be covering some of the days top headlines from around the world.
Also be sure to catch tonights guest Kurt Haskell.

Many people dont even remember the incident that led to the expansion of the TSA in airports and the rollout of the bodyscanners, but it was in fact a proven set up, which has become known as the underwear bomber plot. Despite eyewitness testimony that there was far more to the story than the media reported, the mainstream media continues to ignore these statements, specifically that of Kurt Haskell.
I wish to thank the Court for allowing me these 5 minutes to make my statement. My references to the government in this statement refer to the Federal Government excluding this Court and the prosecution. On Christmas Day 2009, my wife and I were returning from an African safari and had a connecting flight through Amsterdam. As we waited for our flight, we sat on the floor next to the boarding gate. What I witnessed while sitting there and subsequent events have changed my life forever. While I sat there, I witnessed Umar dressed in jeans and a white t-shirt, being escorted around security by a man in a tan suit who spoke perfect American English and who aided Umar in boarding without a passport. The airline gate worker initially refused Umar boarding until the man in the tan suit intervened. The event meant nothing to me at the time. Little did I know that Umar would try to kill me a few hours later as our flight approached Detroit. The final 10 minutes of our flight after the attack were the worst minutes of my life. During those 10 minutes I sat paralyzed in fear. Unfortunately, what happened next has had an even greater impact on my life and has saddened me further.
When we landed, I was shocked that our plane taxied up to the gate. I was further shocked that we were forced to sit on the plane for 20 minutes with powder from the so called bomb all over the cabin. The officers that boarded the plane did nothing to ensure our safety and did not check for accomplices or other explosive devices. Several passengers trampled through parts of the bomb as they exited the plane. We were then taken into the terminal with our unchecked carry on bags. Again, there was no concern for our safety even though Umar told the officers that there was another bomb on board as he exited the plane. I wondered why nobody was concerned about our safety, accomplices or other bombs and the lack of concern worried me greatly. I immediately told the FBI my story in order to help catch the accomplice I had seen in Amsterdam. It soon became obvious that the FBI wasnt interested in what I had to say, which upset me further. For one month the government refused to admit the existence of the man in the tan suit before changing course and admitting his existence in an ABC News article on January 22, 2010. That was the last time the government talked about this man. The video that would prove the truth of my account has never been released. I continue to be emotionally upset that the video has not been released. The Dutch police, meanwhile, in this article (show article), also confirmed that Umar did not show his passport in Amsterdam which also meant that he didnt go through security as both are in the same line in Amsterdam. It upsets me that the government refuses to admit this fact.
I became further saddened from this case, when Patrick Kennedy of the State Department during Congressional hearings, admitted that Umar was a known terrorist, was being followed, and the U.S. allowed him into the U.S. so that it could catch Umars accomplices. I was once again shocked and saddened when Michael Leiter of the National Counter terrorism Center admitted during these same hearings that intentionally letting terrorists into the U.S. was a frequent practice of the U.S. Government. I cannot fully explain my sadness, disappointment and fear when I realized that my government allowed an attack on me intentionally.
During this time, I questioned if my country intentionally put a known terrorist onto my flight with a live bomb. I had many sleepless nights over this issue. My answer came shortly thereafter. In late 2010, the FBI admitted to giving out intentionally defective bombs to the Portland Christmas Tree Bomber, the Wrigley Field Bomber and several others. Further, Mr. Chambers was quoted in the Free Press on January 11, 2011 when he indicated that the governments own explosives experts had indicated that Umars bomb was impossibly defective. I wondered how that could be. Certainly, I thought, Al Qaeda wouldnt go through all of the trouble to plan such an attack only to provide the terrorist with an impossibly defective bomb.
I attended nearly all of the pretrial hearings. At the hearing on January 28, 2011, I was greatly disappointed by the prosecutions request to block evidence from Mr. Chambers as it could then be able to be obtained by third parties, who could use it in a civil suit against the government. It really bothered me that the government apparently was admitting to wrongdoing of some kind as it admitted that it was concerned it would be sued. It further upset me to know that the government was putting its own interests ahead of those of the passengers.
When I attended the jury selection hearings, I questioned why versions of the same two questions kept coming up, those being:
1. Do you think youll be able to tell whether something is actually a bomb? and 2. Do you realize that sometimes the media doesnt always tell the truth?
I continued to be greatly saddened at this point as I felt the truth continued to be hidden.
When Umar listed me as his only witness, I was happy to testify, not on his behalf, but on behalf of the truth. I never expected to testify, as my eyewitness account would have been too damaging to the myth that the government and media are putting forward. A mere 5 days after I was announced as a witness, there was an inexplicable guilty plea which exasperated me as I no longer would be testifying.
In closing I will just say that regardless of how the media and government try to shape the public perception of this case, I am convinced that Umar was given an intentionally defective bomb by a U.S. Government agent and placed on our flight without showing a passport or going through security, to stage a false terrorist attack to be used to implement various government policies.
The effect this matter has had on my life has been astounding and due to this case, I will never trust the government in any matter, ever.
In regards to sentencing, nothing Ive said excuses the fact that Umar tried to kill me. He has waived his valid claim to the entrapment defense. Umar, you are not a great Muslim martyr, you are merely a Patsy. I ask the court to impose the mandatory sentence.