Saturday, March 9, 2013
The Wayseer Manifesto (With Subtitles) ~ Full 1080p HD Version
ATTENTION: All you rule-breakers, you misfits & troublemakers, all you free-spirits & pioneers... Everything the establishment has told you is wrong with you - is actually what's right with you...
You know in your heart that there's a natural order to life,
something more sovereign than any man-made rules or laws could ever express.
This natural order is called "the "Way".
We are - all - the same - you know
'cuz we're all affected by the "Way" -
We are - all - the same - you know
'cuz we're all attracted to the flame -
90% of human civilization is populated with those who's brains are blocked to the "Way". Their brains are hardwired to enforce the social programming indoctrinated since birth. Unlike you they cannot break out of this programming, because they have not yet experienced the necessary revolution of mind. These programmed people take social institutions and rules very seriously. Society is full of games programmed to keep peoples' minds occupied so they will not revolt. These games often cause sick fixations on peculiar protocols, power structures, taboos and domination - all subtle forms of human bondage - This distinct form of madness is not only tolerated by the masses but insisted upon. The programmed ones believe in rules so forcefully they become willing to destroy anyone who violates them.
Wayseers are the ones who call their bluff. Since Wayseer minds are free to reject social programming, Wayseers readily see social institutions for what they are - imaginary games. Wayseers comfort the disturbed and disturb the comfortable. Helping those who are lost in these games and refuse to help themselves is a calling of many Wayseers. Since Wayseers are the ones who keep contact with the original source of reality - they are able to disrupt societal conventions and even governments to realign humanity with the "Way".
the "Way"seers are an ancient lineage. A kind of priesthood - carriers of the flame - ones "in the know." There must always be Wayseers to reform the dizzying psychotic spinning gears of society - giant mindless hamster wheels obscuring the pure blue sky, keeping humanity shackled in a darkened cage - so Wayseers are called - to shed light on the madness of society - to continually resurrect the timeless transcendent Spirit of Truth -
Wayseers reveal this divine truth by devoting themselves to the birth of some creative or disruptive act expressed through art or philosophy, innovations to shake up industry, revolutions for democracy, coups that topple hypocrisy, movements of solidarity, changes that leave a legacy, rebellions against policy, spirit infused technology, moments of clarity, things that challenge barbarity, watersheds of sincerity, momentous drives for charity
We are - all - the same - you know
'cuz we're all affected by the "Way" -
We are - all - the same - you know
'cuz we're all attracted to the flame -
Spanish version available now with OVER 5 MILLION VIEWS:http://www.youtube.com/watch?&v=K...
Fair Use Notice:
Any copyrighted material used in this video is used for non-profit educational purposes only.
I Have just added the subtitles to spread the awareness as a Wayseer & in support of all the other Wayseer's,
All materials used belongs to:-:
Website ~ http://WayseerManifesto.com
Facebook ~ http://facebook.com/Wayseers
YouTube ~ http://www.youtube.com/user/WayseerNews
Update Regarding The Global Accounts with Neil Keenan in Indonesia
The Rumor Mill News Reading Room
Update Regarding The Global Accounts with Neil Keenan in Indonesia
Posted By: Jordon [Send E-Mail]
Date: Saturday, 9-Mar-2013 12:42:05
Date: Saturday, 9-Mar-2013 12:42:05
|
US government and its AIPAC/Zionist corporate controllers now form the major engine of state-sponsored terrorism on the planet
SATURDAY, MARCH 09, 2013
Alcuin Bramerton Twitter .. WikiLeaks Master Mirror Sites .. #1ab archive
Alcuin Bramerton profile ..... Index of blog contents ..... Home .....#1abPicture: War for profit. War for theft. War for torture. US militarism in Iraq.
A detailed new compilation of evidence by the Guardian newspaper (London) and the BBC Arabic Service (London) has brought up fresh material to support the emerging international view that the US government and its AIPAC/Zionist corporate controllers now form the major engine of state-sponsored terrorism on the planet.
During the Bush Jnr presidency, the US Pentagon sent Colonel James Steele (58), an American veteran of its dirty wars in Central America, to oversee sectarian police commando units in Iraq which set up covert detention and torture centres to extract information from insurgents. These units conducted some of the worst acts of torture reported during the US occupation and deliberately accelerated the country's downward spiral into civil war. This civil war served the requirements of US business and diplomacy in the region.
The allegations, made by US and Iraqi witnesses in the new fifty-minute London documentary, implicate US government advisers for the first time in the human rights abuses committed. David Petraeus has been directly linked through an adviser, Colonel James H Coffman, to this abuse. Coffman described himself as Petraeus's eyes and ears out on the ground in Iraq. Steele and Coffman worked as a team and knew everything about the US-sanctioned torture programmes.
Each clandestine US detention centre in Iraq had its own interrogation committee. Each one was made up of an intelligence officer and eight interrogators. These committees used various means of torture to make the detainees confess, including electricity, hanging them upside down, pulling out their nails, and beating them on their genitals.
The fifteen-month Guardian/BBC Arabic investigation was sparked by the release of classified US military logs on WikiLeaks which detailed hundreds of incidents where US soldiers came across tortured detainees in the secret network of US/Iraqi detention centres.
The US torture pattern in Iraq showed a clear parallel with the well-documented human rights abuses committed by US-advised and funded paramilitary squads in Central America in the 1980s. James Steele was head of a US team of special military advisers which trained units of El Salvador's security forces in 'counterinsurgency'. David Petraeus visited El Salvador in 1986 while Steele was there and became a major advocate of his 'counterinsurgency' methods.
Just before Petraeus and Steele left Iraq in September 2005, Jabr al-Solagh was appointed as the new Iraqi minister of the interior. Under Solagh, who was closely associated with the violent Badr Brigades militia, allegations of torture and brutality soared. The militia units had evolved into death squads.
High-ranking Iraqis who worked with the US after the invasion of Iraq warned Petraeus of the consequences of appointing Solagh. Their pleas were ignored. The resultant Iraqi civil war claimed tens of thousands of lives. At the height of the sectarian conflict, three thousand bodies a month were found strewn across the streets.
Above Petraeus, and actively supportive of his covert torture organisations in Iraq, was Donald Rumsfeld, the US Secretary of Defense from January 2001 to December 2006. Rumsfeld, it should not be forgotten, narrowly avoided arrest in Paris on war crimes charges, on Friday 26th October 2007. Only a desperate dash to the American embassy on the Avenue Gabriel saved him on that occasion.
Mainstream reportage and fifty minute video documentary: here (06.03.13) and here (06.03.13).
Commentary: here (07.03.13), here (07.03.13) and here(07.03.13).
Historical note: The Petraeus Doctrine and The Salvador Option for Iraq here (08.10.08).
Picture: Anonymous. The guilty must pay. 4.6GB of US bankster data released.
Picture: What is Peter Hans Kolvenbach doing in Lebanon? Jesuit infighting.
Picture: Another dodgy cardinal is crapped down the tube. Keith O'Brien.
On Sunday 24th February 2013, Cardinal Keith O'Brien, the Archbishop of St Andrews and Edinburgh (Scotland), the UK's most senior Roman Catholic cleric, did not turn up for Mass at St Mary's Cathedral in Edinburgh as scheduled.
Intelligence surfaced in the Observer newspaper (London) that same morning that four complaints against O'Brien alleging inappropriate acts against three serving priests and a former priest during the 1980s had been received by the Vatican. The allegations are understood to have been of a homosexual nature.
On Monday 25th February 2013, O'Brien resigned with immediate effect following consultation with the Pope and the Vatican. He had been Archbishop since 1985.
Keith O'Brien's abrupt and unexpected departure left the Scottish Catholic Church confused, disoriented and shocked. Only three out of eight Roman Catholic dioceses in Scotland now have full-time, permanent bishops in charge. More disclosures are expected.
Late note: On Sunday 3rd March 2013, after a week of lies and evasions, and attempts to scare off the Observer newspaper (London) with 'legal action', a disgraced and humiliated Keith O'Brien was obliged to admit that he had been guilty of sexual misconduct throughout his career. He had persistently and covertly breached the Roman Catholic Church's strict rules on celibacy and homosexual activity.
News reportage: here (04.03.13), here (04.03.13), here(03.03.12), here (03.03.13), here (03.03.13), here (02.03.13),here (26.02.13), here (26.02.13), here (26.02.13), here(25.02.13), here (25.02.13), here (25.02.13) and here(24.02.13).
Commentary and opinion: here (06.03.13), here(06.03.13), here (06.03.13), here (04.03.13), here (02.03.13),here (02.03.13), here (02.03.13), here (02.03.13), here(01.03.13), here (27.02.13), here (27.02.13) and here(26.02.13).
Maybe try Romanism?
We are often asked by innocent, impressionable young people, with smartphones in their pockets and Rampant Rabbits in their sportsbags, what, exactly, we think of Roman Churchianity (also known as the Roman Catholic Church).
Our response to these enquiries is always measured, balanced and responsible.
We point out that although the quality of popes has declined recently, and there are no longer the fringe benefits for altar boys which once, in happier times, were enjoyed by many, Roman churchianity is still a hobby worthy of consideration, particularly by those with dark-side antiquarian interests.
If, for example, a modern young person is looking for religion rather than spirituality, then Roman churchianity may well be a live option.
Some well-informed, contemporary authorities say that Roman churchianity is church with the Christianity taken out, and a sprinkle of negative energy and spiritual fascism added in. This is a fair comment, but it is not the whole story.
Certainly, if guilt, sin, sectarianism and dogmatic-style unprotected sex are what you are looking for, then Roman churchianity may be right up your street.
But others say that Roman churchianity is not a thing to get involved with if you are of a nervous disposition and feel uncomfortable with a religion which apes the style of US foreign policy, i.e. one which combines fundamentalist mantras with an all-consuming desire to dominate the weak.
In our view, this is slightly unfair. Many people who, in past centuries, proudly attached their undergarments to the mast of Roman churchianity, have now been reincarnated into quite positive, fun-loving, New Age lives.
And it should not be forgotten, that Roman churchianity generates a good deal of helpful literature. We would notice especially, in this context, the Catechism of the Roman Catholic Church. This is a well thought-out book which offers the informed reader many interesting old ideas which can form the basis for a lively, individuated, do-it-yourself church lifestyle. And the book also contains several interesting theories which can be useful as discussion-starters when having a drink with Muslim friends.
In this modern age, Roman churchianity needs all the help it can get. And it is getting a lot of help from the media. This popular support is to be welcomed and trusted.
The federal government has no clothes
This information, if accepted, could cause serious shifts in power.
I plan on authoring a version more easily understood by those who have
never learned legal terms. In the meantime, I really want to get this info out
and let it grow on its own.
The bottom line... The US Congress is strictly limited in power unless
you live on federal land. On federal land, Congress may pass any
law they want WITHOUT LIMITATIONS.
If you live on federal land (Washington, DC) you must obey any law passed
by Congress.
There are no limits on what Congress can tell DC citizens to do, except possibly, the bill of rights. If you do not live on, and weren't born on federal land, most federal laws do not apply to you.
There are no limits on what Congress can tell DC citizens to do, except possibly, the bill of rights. If you do not live on, and weren't born on federal land, most federal laws do not apply to you.
All "unconstitutional" laws written by the US Congress apply to
"US Citizens". The 14th amendment defines exactly who is a US
citizen. Guess what? The commonly accepted meme for this definition is exactly
backwards. Most people are NOT US Citizens.
The proof follows:
Please spread this info far and wide (anonymously). Even Supreme court decisions can be overturned with this info if it has enough popular support. Think "the emperor has no clothes.
I'll start with my conclusion: According to the 14th amendment most people are not citizens of the United States (federal government).
Examine the 14th amendment.
"All persons born or
naturalized in the United States, and subject to
the jurisdictionthereof,
are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside."
The words "born or naturalized" and "subject to the
jurisdiction" are linked with the word "and". In
legal language, both must be true for any text that follows (are citizens of
the United
States).
I was born in Mississippi on land not owned by the
federal government.The land was not "subject to the jurisdiction
thereof" of the federal government, so the 14th amendment does not make
me a US Citizen.
Why? I did not meet the "jurisdiction" requirement imposed by
the word "and".
Your situation is probably the same. People who are not United
States Citizens are:
Those born or naturalized outside
federally owned land.
The 14th amendment positively identifies those who must be United
States Citizens but makes no statement about who is not a
US Citizen.To be a US citizen, you must be born on federally owned land to be
under the jurisdiction of Congress. If you are not under
the jurisdiction of Congress when born or naturalized, you are not a citizen of
the United States by virtue of the 14th amendment.
Here's my legal argument based on the Constitution
itself.
Point 1:
The term "and subject to the jurisdiction
thereof" absolutely proves the term "United
States" refers to a government, not geography. Only
a government can have jurisdiction. A "land mass" cannot have
jurisdiction, since a land mass cannot write laws. Only governments write law.
Point 2:
The jurisdiction of the federal government,
termed the "United States" is defined inArticle 1, Section 8, clause
17 of the Constitution.(No other place in the Constitution gives the federal
government geographic jurisdiction.
All other jurisdiction is limited to "granted powers" in clauses
1-16).
Here's clause 17 from Article 1, Section 8. It is the only
geographically defined jurisdiction in the Constitution...
"To exercise exclusive Legislation (jurisdiction)
in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten
Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the acceptance of
Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States,
and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent
of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the
Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful
Buildings;"
If you weren't born in Washington, D.C., federally
managed territories (Puerto Rico, Guam, Samoa) or federally owned land
(purchased from the States), the 14th amendment does not
say you are a United States Citizen.
We can call ourselves "citizens of the United
States of America", but that term doesn't imply jurisdiction. It's just a
description of the Republic we were born into.
Again... a "land mass" does not write laws, so
there is no "jurisdiction" implied by "United States of
America". A land mass is not a government, and can pass no laws.
This gives us a clear rule to apply:
Laws written for "US Citizens" or
"Citizens of the United States" do not apply to those born on land
outside the geographical jurisdiction of the government called the "United
States" (which is really the US Congress, since only they can
write law).
The geographic jurisdiction of the United States is
Washington D.C. and federally owned land, per the US Constitution.
Any law written for US Citizens only applies to 14th
amendment US Citizens, since this is the only place such citizenship is
defined. The only exceptions to this are laws written to carry out
Constitutionally granted powers like coining money and building postal roads.
See Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution for a complete list.
Even these laws are not enforceable if the law is
overreaching to carry out a Constitutional duty. See the definition of
necessary and proper.
This also solves the "Anchor baby" immigration
problem. If you aren't born on federal land, you are NOT a US
Citizen.Illegal immigrant children could be a citizen of the State they
were born in, but ONLY if both Congress sets that immigration rule, and the
state is willing to grant citizenship as well.
Rebuttals to popular claims against my arguments:
Aren't the several states in United States
'territory'?
Yes, but the 14th amendment is based on jurisdiction,
not territory.
Isn't everyone under federal jurisdiction for
Constitutionally granted powers of Congress?
If the 14th amendment omitted "in the United
States", then only vague jurisdiction would apply. "in the United
States" specifically refers to geography. Since you must meet both
the geographic and jurisdictional requirements of the 14th amendment,
a simple test of jurisdiction doesn't make you a US Citizen.
Can Congress write laws to make you a citizen of the
United States?
No law written by Congress can make you a US Citizen
because any such law would be changing the jurisdiction defined in Article 1,
Section 8, clause 17 of the Constitution. Congress can't change the
Constitution by passing a law. Redefining the Constitution requires an
Amendment.
The positive to neutralize the negative
This is very well explained and should help people
understand OPPT , from someone who was dubious who changed his mind,
http://removingtheshackles.net/
http://removingtheshackles.net/
The positive to neutralize the negative
The response that was posted was so simply well put that I
had to share it.
OPPT or Co-opted? Look Before You Leap
by Zen Gardner
March 7th, 2013
Arend Lammertink on 03/08/2013 at 9:04 AM said:
Thanks for sharing your views. I must say that, at first, I
didn’t like the idea of some trustees apparently making bold claims and
decisions for me in something called a trust. However, I changed my mind.
I have done quite some research on the legal system, and
wrote an article about the essential difference between Common Law and
Roman-type civil law, which is the authority under which the legal system
operates. The civil law system is organised top-down and thus you have by definition
a ruler. The common law system is organised bottom-up and it derives its
authority directly from We, The People:
Now, my research shows that under current international
Roman type Civil Law, virtually ALL Kings or Kingdoms – governments or states
in modern language – are operated under the authority c.q. sovereignty of the
Pope as the mediator between We, The People and God. So, in order to claim the
freedom of all people on the planet, you, most of all, have to circumvent the
(ultimate) authority of the Pope, which is a mere mediator between us and God.
And, ultimately, the supposed authority of the Pope is a self-appointed
authority, which is based on a falsification, the Donation of Constantine.
The way I see it, the OPPT, at its very core, invalidated
the authority of the Pope and, thus, by extension, of the whole Roman type
Civil law system. It claims that we, as a people, have no one to answer to but
ourselves and the creator, and are essentially bound to common law, which is
exactly the jurisdiction under which, not only the United States, but also the
(former) Dutch Batavian and French Republics have been founded, even though the
latter two have been overthrown by the defeat of Napoleon. Interestingly, the
legal entity “Batavian Republic” still exists. It has essentially been occupied
by a foreign entity, the Kingdom of The Netherlands, which derives its
authority from the “holy and undivided trinity”, a.k.a. “the Vatican” and/or
“The Pope”.
So, IMHO, the OPPT is essentially a global declaration of
independence and a bill of rights. And since the declarations by the
above-mentioned republics were legally valid, I see no reason why this one
would not be legally valid. Yes, these republics filed their declarations in a
different way, basically by publishing it and/or noticing their previous ruler
which would be some king, but that does not mean that the way the OPPT
published their declaration is invalid.
Now, of course, no one asked for your permission when
founding any of the above-mentioned republics. However, none of these take away
anything from you, especially regarding your rights. All they do is declare you
to be free and answerable only to the creator. What you do with those rights is
totally up to you.
In other words, the whole thing is most of all an idea. And
the idea is that all people are created equal and free.
And I believe this is going to work, if only because of what
Vicor Hugo said, “Nothing is as powerful as an idea whose time has come.”
Arend Lammertink on 03/08/2013 at 2:05 PM said:
“human rights should be protected by the rule of law”
Civil, Roman type law, that is.
“no distinction shall be made on the basis of the political,
jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory to which a
person belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self-governing or under
any other limitation of sovereignty.”
to which a person belongs….
So, I BELONG to to a “country or territory”??
“Everyone has the right to an effective remedy by the
competent national tribunals for acts violating the fundamental rights granted
him by the constitution or by law.”
rights GRANTED him by the constitution or by law??
Compare this with the Dutch declaration of human rights of
1795, as quoted in my article:
1. All Humans are born with equal Rights and these Natural
Rights cannot be taken away from them [i.e., are inalienable].
We are BORN with equal, natural rights. These are not
GRANTED by any kind of ruler, be it a constitution, a government or an international
body.
THAT is what this (OPPT) is all about. The principle of
BEing free instead of having been “granted” our freedom by someone/something
that is by definition a ruler; a ruler, which has NO RIGHT to grant us anything
which is already ours to begin with. Our BIRTHRIGHTS have been granted to us by
our Creator, which indeed is one and the same idea on which the United States
has been founded.
And, thus, it is indeed nothing new. All that happened is
that this idea has been re-worded and re-claimed within a new document and
under a new legal entity which did not exist in the 1700′s.
Thanks for sharing your views. I must say that, at first, I
didn’t like the idea of some trustees apparently making bold claims and
decisions for me in something called a trust. However, I changed my mind.
history of civil
law, OPPT, zen gardner
A response that was posted was so simply well put that I had to share it.
A response that was posted was so simply well put that I had to share it.
OPPT or Co-opted? Look Before You Leap
by Zen Gardner
March 7th, 2013
Arend Lammertink on 03/08/2013 at 9:04 AM said:
Thanks for sharing your views. I must say that, at first, I
didn’t like the idea of some trustees apparently making bold claims and
decisions for me in something called a trust. However, I changed my mind.
I have done quite some research on the legal system, and
wrote an article about the essential difference between Common Law and
Roman-type civil law, which is the authority under which the legal system
operates. The civil law system is organised top-down and thus you have by
definition a ruler. The common law system is organised bottom-up and it derives
its authority directly from We, The People:
Now, my research shows that under current international
Roman type Civil Law, virtually ALL Kings or Kingdoms – governments or states
in modern language – are operated under the authority c.q. sovereignty of the
Pope as the mediator between We, The People and God. So, in order to claim the
freedom of all people on the planet, you, most of all, have to circumvent the
(ultimate) authority of the Pope, which is a mere mediator between us and God.
And, ultimately, the supposed authority of the Pope is a self-appointed
authority, which is based on a falsification, the Donation of Constantine.
The way I see it, the OPPT, at its very core, invalidated
the authority of the Pope and, thus, by extension, of the whole Roman type
Civil law system. It claims that we, as a people, have no one to answer to but
ourselves and the creator, and are essentially bound to common law, which is
exactly the jurisdiction under which, not only the United States, but also the
(former) Dutch Batavian and French Republics have been founded, even though the
latter two have been overthrown by the defeat of Napoleon. Interestingly, the
legal entity “Batavian Republic” still exists. It has essentially been occupied
by a foreign entity, the Kingdom of The Netherlands, which derives its
authority from the “holy and undivided trinity”, a.k.a. “the Vatican” and/or
“The Pope”.
So, IMHO, the OPPT is essentially a global declaration of
independence and a bill of rights. And since the declarations by the
above-mentioned republics were legally valid, I see no reason why this one
would not be legally valid. Yes, these republics filed their declarations in a
different way, basically by publishing it and/or noticing their previous ruler
which would be some king, but that does not mean that the way the OPPT
published their declaration is invalid.
Now, of course, no one asked for your permission when
founding any of the above-mentioned republics. However, none of these take away
anything from you, especially regarding your rights. All they do is declare you
to be free and answerable only to the creator. What you do with those rights is
totally up to you.
In other words, the whole thing is most of all an idea. And
the idea is that all people are created equal and free.
And I believe this is going to work, if only because of what
Vicor Hugo said, “Nothing is as powerful as an idea whose time has come.”
Arend Lammertink on 03/08/2013 at 2:05 PM said:
“human rights should be protected by the rule of law”
Civil, Roman type law, that is.
“no distinction shall be made on the basis of the political,
jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory to which a
person belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self-governing or under
any other limitation of sovereignty.”
to which a person belongs….
So, I BELONG to to a “country or territory”??
“Everyone has the right to an effective remedy by the
competent national tribunals for acts violating the fundamental rights granted
him by the constitution or by law.”
rights GRANTED him by the constitution or by law??
Compare this with the Dutch declaration of human rights of
1795, as quoted in my article:
1. All Humans are born with equal Rights and these Natural
Rights cannot be taken away from them [i.e., are inalienable].
We are BORN with equal, natural rights. These are not
GRANTED by any kind of ruler, be it a constitution, a government or an
international body.
THAT is what this (OPPT) is all about. The principle of
BEing free instead of having been “granted” our freedom by someone/something
that is by definition a ruler; a ruler, which has NO RIGHT to grant us anything
which is already ours to begin with. Our BIRTHRIGHTS have been granted to us by
our Creator, which indeed is one and the same idea on which the United States
has been founded.
And, thus, it is indeed nothing new. All that happened is
that this idea has been re-worded and re-claimed within a new document and
under a new legal entity which did not exist in the 1700′s.
DISCLAIMER:
Please let me know if you don't want me to send emails that
inform. I'm only wanting to give information that could possibly help us in the
future, but I don't want to send them if you don't want them. There could be
some non-truths in some emails and would require discernment on your part. You
must always investigate for yourselves what is real and what isn't in all of
today's information, especially on the internet. I try to stay tuned to what is
going on. I am a watcher.
In in these last days and in today's environment, anything is possible. When we are aware of issues, we can pray and perhaps act, if God leads us to do so.
In in these last days and in today's environment, anything is possible. When we are aware of issues, we can pray and perhaps act, if God leads us to do so.
Immune Tea: Nature's Flu Shot (Complete Recipe)
Immune
Tea: Nature's Flu Shot (Complete Recipe)
![]() Immune Tea: Nature's Flu Shot This DIY is armed with: cayenne pepper, Manuka Honey, turmeric, garlic and organic ginger root, organic orange and lemon juices. Cayenne will warm your body, help you sweat and eliminate toxins. Manuka Honey and garlic are natural antibiotics. Turmeric and ginger have strong antiseptic and anti-inflammatory properties. Blend: 4 organic garlic cloves crushed 2 tbsps Manuka Honey 1/2 tsp organic turmeric 2 tbsps grated organic ginger 1/2 tsp organic cayenne pepper 3 cups organic orange juice 1/3 cup organic lemon juice How to take it: Drink 1 cup 3 to 4 times daily to fight off flu and cold or when feeling under the weather. Take until symptoms are gone. NOTE: You can keep up to 2 days refrigerated (without the garlic). I suggest you add the fresh garlic as you go. Please use a BPA-free container. From: http://www.stepintomygreenworld.com/greenliving/greenfoods/a-natural-flu-shot/ See also: "Cold Kicker Remedy: A Tried and True Recipe for Warding off Colds and Flu" http://www.tbyil.com/Cold_Kicker_Remedy.htm "Use Colloidal Silver and Nature to Knock Out the Common Cold" http://www.tbyil.com/Common_Cold.htm "This Year Use Nature to Avoid and Beat Seasonal Colds and Flu" http://www.tbyil.com/Naturally_Avoid_Beat_Colds_Flu.htm |
ALERT: Head of US Government Legal System Spills the Beans…About Silver Manipulation
Bix
Weir: ALERT: Head of US Government Legal System Spills the Beans…About
Silver Manipulation
Attorney General
Eric Holder just testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee that the
investigation into Silver Market Manipulation could not be prosecuted (or made
public) because it would have too adverse of an effect on the Global Economic
System…or something to that effect!Eric Holder Admits Some Banks Are Just Too Big To Prosecute
“I am concerned that the size of some of these institutions becomes so large that it does become difficult for us to prosecute them,” Mr. Holder told lawmakers. Prosecutors, he said, must confront the problem that “if you do prosecute, if you do bring a criminal charge, it will have a negative impact on the national economy, perhaps even the world economy. And I think that is a function of the fact that some of these institutions have become too large.”
“Mr. Holder, however defended his agency. Federal prosecutors, he said, have been “as aggressive as they could be, brought cases where we think we could have brought them,” he said.”
“After the hearing, the panel’s top Republican, Sen. Chuck Grassley of Iowa, issued a statement calling Mr. Holder’s remarks “stunning.” Mr. Holder ” recognized that in effect, the big banks and their senior executives have a get-out-of-jail-free card,” he said.”
NOTHING is by accident anymore and the huge increase in anti-bankster rhetoric and visibility lately is no exception. The facts surrounding the Silver Manipulation investigation are so blatant and so damaging to JP Morgan there is no other Road for the regulators to travel! That is WHY the case still hasn’t been dropped after 4 years. (Remember the head fake published in the Financial Times last August that charges were being dropped? Well, they never were! F-U…FT you criminal conspirators!)
For the ten thousandth time I’ll say it again…
The CFTC WILL bring the hammer down on the Silver Manipulators and Silver WILL finally be released from it’s shackles.
This is the will of “We The People” and we will NEVER give up until JUSTICE is served.
This is where this Road ENDS for the Bad Guys.
Bix Weir
http://jhaines6.wordpress.com/2013/03/07/bix-weir-alert-head-of-us-government-legal-system-spills-the-beans-about-silver-manipulation/
CIA murdered Venezuela’s Hugo Chavez?
PressTV:
CIA murdered Venezuela’s Hugo Chavez?
Posted on
March 7, 2013 by Jean
I
believe I alluded to this possibility earlier this week . . . ~J
Thu Mar 7, 2013 5:34PM GMTBy Terrance Nelson
One man who was not afraid to travel was American Indian Movement leader Vernon Belcourt. Belcourt not only went to Venezuela and Cuba to meet the leadership of those nations, but he also met with Muammar Gaddafi. Vernon Belcourt died five years ago after traveling to Venezuela. On his death bed, Vernon Belcourt joked by saying, “the CIA finally got me”.
Related Interviews:
- ‘US
likely infected Chavez with cancer’
- ‘Pro-Chavez
party to win next elections’
- I
was in Iran five months ago in October 2012 and in Iraq in April 1998. I
believe the death of Chavez is an assassination.
·
·
Chavez
was a leader who tried to free his people from the grip of people who will do
anything to keep the consumer hostage. In the fall of 1998 oil was $15 a barrel
and gasoline was 89 cents a gallon. I was called a dupe of Saddam by western media.
We posted a video called A War On Children.
Our
latest video is What Can You Buy With 5 Trillion Dollars Anything You Want
April 2012. The key information in the new video is that $500 billion per year
is paid by the United States to oil producing nations. In ten years, five
trillion dollars will be paid to oil producing countries for foreign oil. The
movement of trillions of American dollars to other countries is a great concern
for the security of the United States.
What
the world saw about the Iraq wars was the physical attacks but the real target
was the economy of Iraq and the Iraqi Dinar. In 1990, prior to the first war
the Iraq Dinar was worth three and half American dollars. By the time we got
there in 1998, it took 1,450 Iraqi Dinars to buy one American dollar. Saddam
Hussein was a homicidal maniac and a perfect foil to carry out an economic war
against Iraq.
·
The
current threat of war against Iran is touted as preventing Iran from acquiring
the nuclear bomb. The real target however is the Iranian Rial, the currency
that must be driven into oblivion in order to try and keep the American dollar
safe. The killing of Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi affects the value of the
Libyan currency. The Arab Spring ensures the American dollar in those countries
is wasted on infighting. The deaths in Syria is deliberate.
Last
week, I was in South Dakota where we paid $3.85 per gallon of gasoline.
Americans are extremely patriotic. President Obama in his Presidential debate
with Mitt Romney said that the United States spends as much money on the
military as the next ten largest military countries in the world combined.
American do not question their government, they are held hostage to fear of the
“terrorists”. Fear mongering keeps the world hostage to oil. Forbes just
released the current list of the richest people in the world but the trend was
well established years earlier.
As
of 2007, the top 1% owned 34.6% of all privately held wealth, the next 19% had
50.5%, which means 20% of Americans owned 85% of all wealth in the United
States. The bottom 80% of Americans had only 15% of the wealth in their
control.
·
In
December 1995, the United Nations released a study finding that 567,000 Iraqi
children died in the first five years of economic sanctions. Few cared in the
west about half a million dead Iraqi children, we just blamed Saddam. Today,
the economic sanctions against Iran is causing untold deaths of Iranian people
as Iran is forced to buy pharmaceuticals with cold hard American dollars. The
economic sanctions against Iran is working. The target has always been the
collapse of the Iranian economy, the fear of the Iranian bomb is just the ruse.
Israel has 200 nuclear bombs, 100 of them target Iran. The deaths of millions
of Iranians will not bother us here in Canada and United States, anymore than
the deaths of millions of children dying in Iraq or in Africa. The death of
Hugo Chavez will not cause America any grief, it is acceptable to most
Americans.
Since
the United States left Vietnam, the Vietnamese who suffered horrendous
atrocities during the war have not killed any Americans. Left on their own,
Vietnam has not sent terrorists across the ocean to kill Americans. Iran wants
to avoid war with the United States. If the goal was peace, the United States
would leave Iran alone or partner with them in stabilizing the Middle East.
This will not happen anytime soon, the real target is to force Iran and other
oil countries to spend their accumulated American currency. Chavez believed in
freeing Venezuela from the grip of the IMF and American corporate greed. The
death of Chavez is one of a long list of leaders who opposed the west.
Democratic election does not ensure the respect of the Americans who feel
threatened by leadership in other countries that want to free their people from
international economic bondage. Drones are not the only means of assassination.
In
the United States, Americans need to wake up, to question their government. The
truth is that the Arabs and other oil producing countries are not the ones
causing $4 a gallon gasoline in the United States. As long as Americans
continue to see the world through the filtered bias of the major US news
networks, there will be no sympathy for leaders like Chavez. Chavez is a hero
to the people of Venezuela and to other nations wanting to free themselves from
being held hostage to greed.
Chavez
cannot Rest in Peace unless others take up his cause. As you hand over your
money to the cashier for your gasoline, think about where the money you pay for
gasoline goes. Think of the price paid by others for our dependency on foreign
oil. First Nations in Canada also pay a price for American dependency upon
foreign oil. In the Tarsands of Alberta, the environmental devastation of an
area the size of France affects not only the land but every aspect of the
lifestyle of indigenous people. Chavez sent fuel oil to poor Native Americans
in the Dakotas. The same Dakotas today negotiate with the oil companies and
governments that covet the Bakken oil fields.
·
A
few years ago, I met with Venezuelan Embassy staff in Ottawa. Two other First
Nations leaders bowed out of the meeting, their fear was tangible. One man who
was not afraid to travel was American Indian Movement leader Vernon Belcourt.
Belcourt not only went to Venezuela and Cuba to meet the leadership of those
nations, but he also met with Muammar Gaddafi. Vernon Belcourt died five years
ago after traveling to Venezuela. On his death bed, Vernon Belcourt joked by
saying, “the CIA finally got me”.
Chavez
was a hero. We wish the people of Venezuela peace and in their tears, that they
remember Chavez’s death need not only be a matter of grief but a celebration
for a man of courage who lived his life to the fullest. God will greet him with
open arms.
TN/JR
Terrance Nelson is
Vice Chairman of American Indian Movement and Former five term Chief of Roseau
River Anishinabe First Nation.
http://jhaines6.wordpress.com/2013/03/07/presstv-cia-murdered-venezuelas-hugo-chavez/
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)



+%231ab..jpg?SSImageQuality=Full)