Thursday, March 28, 2013

Obama Ignores Nullification, Says Federal Agents Will Enforce Obamacare


Subj: Obama Ignores Nullification, Says Federal Agents Will Enforce Obamacare

Obama Ignores Nullification, Says Federal Agents Will Enforce Obamacare


In a move that is reminiscent of the tyrannical actions of Abraham Lincoln that led to the War of Northern Aggression, Barack Obama says that he will not wait on states to enforce Obamacare.

Instead his administration has announced its intent is to completely disregard the state’s Tenth Amendment rights to nullification of the Obamacare law, via their passed legislation and state constitutions. In fact, his administration has said that in states where they refuse to comply with federal healthcare mandates that agents from the Department of Health and Human Services will assume absolute control over the state’s health insurance industry.
Politico reports,
Insurance regulation is a huge responsibility that’s been closely guarded by the states. That’s why the Obama administration and those closely watching the rollout of Obamacare believe that even states that have sworn off the law’s coverage expansions will still enforce its new measures — including new benefit mandates, cost-sharing guidelines and rules on how insurers rate customers — to retain control over their health insurance markets.
But the feds will be overseeing the health care law in Missouri, Oklahoma, Texas and Wyoming after those states told HHS they couldn’t or wouldn’t implement the new rules.
“We are enforcing because Oklahoma notified … that it has not enacted legislation to enforce or that it is otherwise not enforcing the Affordable Care Act market reform provisions,” Gary Cohen, director of the federal Center for Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight, wrote to the Oklahoma Insurance Department on Friday. Officials in Missouri, Texas and Wyoming received similar letters, an agency spokeswoman said.
The enforcement letters come a little more than a month after a Commonwealth Fund report found just 11 states and Washington had started to adjust state laws to prepare for seven major ACA insurance reforms taking effect in 2014.
In a statement by Oklahoma Insurance Commissioner John Doak he said, “It is unfortunate that health insurers are being forced into a system of dual regulation by the overreaching Obama administration. My position on this has never wavered, and I welcome every opportunity to try to overturn Obamacare.”

In a letter sent to Cohen, it was clearly stated that the Oklahoma Insurance Department does not have the authority to enforce federal law.

“The Oklahoma Insurance Department regulates the health insurance policies sold in the state and responds to consumer questions and complaints. Our consumer assistance team receives over 30,000 phone calls and our website receives over 1,000,000 visits each year,” the letter said.

“We will continue to serve these consumers by adhering to our duties under the State Constitution and Statutes. The consumers are the ones who are going to bear the costs of these unnecessary federal regulatory burdens.”

The Tulsa World reports:
Meanwhile, health insurance companies doing business in Oklahoma are receiving letters from Cohen telling them that enforcement of the law’s requirements will be handled by the federal agency. A state health insurance trade group said the additional level of regulation is troubling.
“The Oklahoma Association of Health Plans’ members are very concerned about the impact dual regulations will have on administrative expenses and premiums paid by our consumers,” said Executive Director Laura Brookins.
Essentially, health coverage that will be sold through a federally run health insurance exchange starting next year will be regulated by the federal government, but coverage outside the exchange — sold by the same companies — will face different rules, forms and officials.
“Unfortunately for everyone, this dual oversight process will result in increased costs for all Oklahoma health plans,” Brookins said.

Doaks warns that this additional level of regulation, or duplicate regulatory scheme will result in increased costs to the consumer. “Oklahomans should be alarmed,” he said.

Deputy insurance Commissioner Mike Rhoads says the two regulatory structures will simply make things needlessly confusing. “Since statehood we’ve been doing this and frankly we’re the … experts in the regulatory matters,” Rhoads said. “I’m not going to say that they can’t do it, but they damned sure can’t do it as efficiently as we can.”

Joe Wolverton at The New American writes,
When it was informed that Oklahoma would not — in fact, legally could not — comply with ObamaCare mandates, HHS was not deterred, proposing instead the establishment of a “collaborative enforcement arrangement.” This deal would permit the feds to force ObamaCare on Oklahomans while allowing the Oklahoma Insurance Department (OID) to ostensibly keep its hands clean.
As if that weren’t insulting enough, included in the cache of documents provided to The New American was the letter mentioned above that was sent to Oklahoma insurance companies from HHS informing them that since Oklahoma cannot or will not enforce the Affordable Care Act (ObamaCare), this responsibility has been assumed by CMS.
Furthermore, as part of its oversight, CMS demands in the letter that insurance companies “submit all group and individual health insurance policy forms, certificates, riders, endorsements, and amendments, as well as any other requested material pertinent to the market reforms of the Affordable Care Act to CMS for review.”
Then, lest insurance companies in Oklahoma doubt who’s in charge of healthcare in the Sooner State, the letter declares that “a filing with the Oklahoma Insurance Department does not constitute a filing with CMS for these purposes.”
In other words, the Obama administration could care less about the boundaries of the Constitution, the Tenth Amendment or anything else regarding the law. They believe they are above the law and will seek to force unlawful laws upon a law abiding people. This is a tyrannical Federal government that is seeking to usurp state constitutions and the will of the people in those states, including nullification legislation that has passed through state legislatures.

Freedom Outpost

http://chasvoice.blogspot.com/2013/03/obama-ignores-nullification-says.html

PressTV: Bradley Manning, Nobel for a noble man


PressTV: Bradley Manning, Nobel for a noble man

Posted on by Jean
(FILES) Photo dated March 15, 2012 shows US Army Private Bradley Manning following a hearing at Fort Meade in Maryland.
Tue Mar 26, 2013 1:9PM GMT
By David Swanson
The Norwegian Nobel Committee (send them a note) can either begin awarding the peace prize to opponents of war or continue on its current course — one which already has many questioning, not whether Manning is worthy of the prize, but whether the prize is worthy of Manning.
Whistleblower Bradley Manning has been nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize, and he should receive it.
No individual has done more to push back against what Martin Luther King Jr. called “the madness of militarism” than Bradley Manning. The United States is the leading exporter of weapons and itself spends as much preparing for more wars as the rest of the world combined.
Manning is the leading actor in opposition to US war-making, and therefore militarism around the world. What he has done has hurt the cause of violence in a number of other nations as well.
And right now, remaining in prison and facing relentless prosecution by the US government, Manning is in need of the Nobel Peace Prize.
Alfred Nobel’s will left funding for a prize to be awarded to “the person who shall have done the most or the best work for fraternity between nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses.”
The intent of the prize was to fund this work. As a result of enormous legal expenses, Bradley Manning is in need of that funding, unlike some other peace prize recipients. In addition, his secret trial — with a potential death sentence — could use all the attention that can be shined on it.
The people of the United States and the rest of the world have learned more about the intentions of the U.S. government from Bradley Manning than from anyone else. “Thanks to Manning’s alleged disclosures, we have a sense of what transpired in Iraq and Afghanistan. We have an image of how Washington operates in the world,” author Chase Madar wrote in his book about Manning’s whistleblowing.
“Thanks to those revelations we now know just how our government leaned on the Vatican to quell opposition to the Iraq War. We now know how Washington pressured the German government to block the prosecution of CIA agents who kidnapped an innocent man, Khaled El-Masri, while he was on vacation. We know how our State Department lobbied hard to prevent a minimum wage increase in Haiti, the hemisphere’s poorest nation.”
Manning revealed a secret U.S. war in Yemen, U.S. records of massive civilian deaths in Iraq and Afghanistan, video of a U.S. helicopter attack on civilians and their rescuers in Baghdad, and facts about the corruption of numerous governments including those of the United States, Tunisia, and Egypt. In those last two nations Manning’s revelations contributed to nonviolent pro-democracy movements.
Among the revelations made by Manning through WikiLeaks is the extent of time and energy the U.S. State Department puts into marketing U.S. weapons to the world’s governments. We all have a better understanding of the work that is needed for peace as a result of this exposure of “diplomacy” as consisting so greatly of weapons selling.
The Guardian newspaper and BBC Arabic detailed last week how the United States armed and trained Iraqi police commando units that ran torture centers and death squads. Maggie O’Kane, executive producer of the documentary, said:
“I hope this film will be a legacy that actually says, ‘If you want to go to war, this is what war means. It means 14-year-old boys being hung up and tortured. It means men being turned on spits. And that’s called counter-insurgency. . . .’ This would not be coming to light if it hadn’t been for Bradley Manning.”
Not only has Manning done the most to resist militarism, but he has done it for its own sahem a nonot by either begin awarding the peace prize to opponents of war or continue on its current coand by his earlier communications in the chat logs that have long been a part of his case. Manning was horrified by crimes and abuses. He believed the public should know what was happening. He believed democracy was more important than blind subservience in the name of a “democracy.”
Manning has been nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize by the Movement in the Icelandic Parliament, the Pirates of the EU; representatives from the Swedish Pirate Party, and the former Secretary of State in Tunisia for Sport & Youth. The nomination states, in part:
“These revelations have fueled democratic uprisings around the world, including a democratic revolution in Tunisia. According to journalists, his alleged actions helped motivate the democratic Arab Spring movements, shed light on secret corporate influence on the foreign and domestic policies of European nations, and most recently contributed to the Obama Administration agreeing to withdraw all U.S. troops from the occupation in Iraq.”
The Norwegian Nobel Committee (send them a note) can either begin awarding the peace prize to opponents of war or continue on its current course — one which already has many questioning, not whether Manning is worthy of the prize, but whether the prize is worthy of Manning. 

David Swanson is an American activist, blogger and author. He served for a year as media coordinator for the International Labor Communications Association. In May 2005, Swanson helped make the Downing Street memo known in the United States and discussed in Congress. He co-founded After Downing Street and led an ongoing campaign to impeach President George W. Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney. Swanson continues to work closely with the peace movement and often leads campaigns to end the Iraq War and punish those involved in launching that war. His Swanson’s books include War Is A Lie. He blogs at http://davidswanson.org and http://warisacrime.org and works as Campaign Coordinator for the online activist organization http://rootsaction.org. He hosts Talk Nation Radio. More articles by David Swanson

Boris Berezovsky


Boris Berezovsky Has a Broken Rib, and Something Like a Rope Was Found in Bathroom Where He Was Found Suicided to Death
Posted By: IZAKOVIC [Send E-Mail]
Date: Thursday, 28-Mar-2013 08:43:09
Autopsy showed rib fracture
During the autopsy of Berezovsky was found to have a broken rib, and something like a cord in his bathroom
Photo: Olivia Harris / Reuters
28/03/2013, 14:28. Last updated: 28.03.2013, 15:28 | Vladimir Gorda
During the autopsy, Boris Berezovsky was found with broken rib, writes the British media. However, the Chief Inspector of Police District of the valley of the River Thames, Mark Bissel said the guard, seeing disgraced businessman dead, found "something like a cord or a bandage." The investigation into the death of Mr Berezovsky started on Thursday - a funeral policy is only after the proceedings, which will take at least six weeks.
More:
http://www.gazeta.ru/social/2013/03/28/5119821.shtml
It seems that he was suicided, like Litvinenko. Putin is President again.
IZAKOVIC
http://www.deepspace4.com

Obama Bin Lyin' -- I Popped bin Laden Story Coming Unraveled


The Rumor Mill News Reading Room 

Obama Bin Lyin' -- I Popped bin Laden Story Coming Unraveled
Posted By: Watchman
Date: Wednesday, 27-Mar-2013 22:42:52

CNN) -- In February, Esquire magazine published a lengthy profile of "The Man Who Killed Osama bin Laden." The story did not identify the killer by his real name, referring to him only as "the Shooter."
The Shooter told Esquire he encountered al Qaeda's leader face-to-face in the top-floor bedroom of the compound in Abbottabad, Pakistan, where he'd been hiding for more than five years.
The Shooter said the al Qaeda leader was standing up and had a gun "within reach" and it was only then that the Shooter fired two shots into bin Laden's forehead, killing him. That account was in conflict with the narrative from another raid participant in a wildly successful book, "No Easy Day."
Peter Bergen
Peter Bergen
Now, another member of the secretive SEAL Team 6, which executed the bin Laden raid, tells CNN the story of the Shooter as presented in Esquire is false. According to this serving SEAL Team 6 operator, the story is "complete B-S."
Watch more: Peter Bergen examines the differing accounts on "The Lead with Jake Tapper"
SEAL Team 6 operators are now in "serious lockdown" when it comes to "talking to anybody" about the bin Laden raid and say they have been frustrated to see what they consider to be the inaccurate story in Esquire receive considerable play without a response. Phil Bronstein, who wrote the 15,000-word piece about the Shooter for Esquire, was booked on CNN, Fox and many other TV networks after his story came out.
Twenty-three SEALs and their interpreter launched the assault on the bin Laden compound just after midnight on the morning of May 2, 2011. They shot and killed bin Laden's two bodyguards, one of bin Laden's sons and the wife of one of the bodyguards, and wounded two other women.
SEALs' accounts differ
Who really killed bin Laden?
Reported bin Laden killer speaks out
2011: 3 of bin Laden's wives identified
The first three SEALs to make it to the top floor of the compound were "the point man," "the Shooter" profiled by Esquire, and Matt Bissonette, the SEAL who wrote "No Easy Day" under the pseudonym Mark Owen.
What actually happened the night of the raid, according to the SEAL Team 6 operator who I interviewed, is that the "point man" ran up the stairs to the top floor and shot bin Laden in the head when he saw what looked like bin Laden poking his head out of his bedroom door. The shot gravely wounded al Qaeda's leader.
Having taken down bin Laden, the point man proceeded to rush two women he found in the bedroom, gathering them in his arms to absorb the explosion in case they were wearing suicide vests, something that was a real concern of those who planned the raid.
'Nightmare' at home for SEAL who shot Osama bin Laden
Two more SEALs then entered bin Laden's bedroom and, seeing that the al Qaeda leader was lying mortally wounded on the floor, finished him off with shots to the chest.
This account of bin Laden's demise is considerably less heroic than the Shooter's version in Esquire, in which he says he shot bin Laden while he was standing up and only after he saw that the al Qaeda leader had a gun within reach.
The SEAL Team 6 operator who spoke to me says there is no way the Shooter could have seen a gun in bin Laden's reach because the two guns that were found in the bedroom after the shooting were only discovered after a thorough search and were sitting on a high shelf above the frame of the door that opened to the room.
SEAL commander rebuts 'Shooter' claim
The SEAL operator also points out there was a discussion before the raid in which the assault team was told "don't shoot the guy (bin Laden) in the face unless you have to" because the CIA would need to analyze good pictures of bin Laden's face for its facial recognition experts to work effectively. Yet the Shooter in the Esquire story says he shot bin Laden on purpose twice in the forehead.
A U.S. official familiar with the details of the raid said the SEAL Team 6 operator's version is in line with what happened. That account "has it right in my view," the official said.
Watch computer animation of the different accounts
The SEAL Team 6 operator also tells CNN that the Shooter was "thrown off" the Red Squadron, the core of the SEAL Team 6 group that carried out the bin Laden raid, because he was bragging about his role in the raid in bars around Virginia Beach, Virginia, where SEAL Team 6 is based. In the Esquire article, the Shooter complains he is receiving no pension, since he left the military four years before the minimum 20 years required to be eligible.
CNN spoke with Bronstein, the Esquire writer, who says he passed on CNN's written questions about the Shooter's role in the raid to his story's main character. The Shooter has not responded to those questions, and Bronstein declined to be interviewed on-the-record for this story.
Stephanie Tuck, a spokeswoman for Esquire, said via e-mail the magazine stands by its story.
"The Esquire article, 'The Shooter: The Man Who Killed Osama Bin Laden,' in the March 2013 issue, is based on information from numerous sources, including members of SEAL Team 6 and the Shooter himself, as well as detailed descriptions of mission debriefs."
More questions were raised about the Esquire story's version of events Monday on SOFREP, a website that covers the Special Operations community. The queries came from former Navy SEAL Brandon Webb in a posting entitled, "Esquire Is Screwed: Duped By Fake UBL 'Shooter.'"
2011: SEALs who killed bin Laden concerned for their safety
According to present and former members of SEAL Team 6, the "point man" who fired the shot that likely mortally wounded bin Laden will never "in a million years" speak publicly about his role in the raid, and they lauded his courageous decision to throw himself on the two women in bin Laden's room.
The new account of the bin Laden raid provided by the serving SEAL Team 6 operator is essentially the same as in Bissonnette's "No Easy Day." Bissonnette says he was one of the first to run into the bedroom and he saw that the point man's shots had mortally wounded bin Laden. Bissonette says he then shot the dying al Qaeda leader as he lay on the floor.
Present and former members of SEAL Team 6 say they regard Bissonnette as more credible than the Shooter.
Balanced against that, according to a story filed by CNN's Barbara Starr last year, after the publication of "No Easy Day," the head of U.S. special operations, Adm. William McRaven, contacted members of the Navy SEAL team that killed bin Laden. According to Pentagon officials, the SEALs said bin Laden was standing in his bedroom when he was shot and they believed that he posed a threat because there were weapons in the room. This account tends to bolster the story the Shooter told Esquire.
In a previous CNN.com story about the Esquire profile, I noted that I was the only outside observer allowed to tour bin Laden's Abbottabad compound before it was demolished in late February 2012.
During that tour, I looked around the bedroom where bin Laden was killed. The Pakistani military officers who were guiding me pointed out a patch of dark, dried blood on the low ceiling of bin Laden's bedroom. This patch of congealed blood seems to be consistent with the Shooter's story that he fired two shots at the forehead of a "surprisingly tall terrorist" while he was standing up. At the time, the precise location of bin Laden when he was shot was not a matter of dispute.
But the blood patch could also be consistent with the account that it was the "point man" who first shot bin Laden. The point man is 5 feet 6 inches tall and was shooting upward at a tall man as he poked his head out of his bedroom.
2011: Obama meets bin Laden raiders, promises victory over al Qaeda
The compound is, of course, now gone, so it is no longer possible to reconstruct what happened the night of the raid based on forensic evidence, although it is possible the Abbottabad Commission, a panel that was appointed by the Pakistani government to look into the raid, could shed some light on this question should its findings ever be publicly released.
Finally, by all accounts, it was a confusing situation the night of the raid. One of the SEAL team's helicopters had crashed and there was a firefight with one of bin Laden's bodyguards. All the electricity in the compound and the surrounding neighborhood was off on a moonless night and the SEALs were all wearing night vision goggles, which only allowed them limited vision.
What seems incontrovertible is that the point man, the Shooter and Bissonnette were the first three SEALs to assault bin Laden's bedroom. But to determine exactly which of them killed the al Qaeda leader may never be possible.
What is certain is that it was a team effort.
Five days after the bin Laden raid, members of the SEAL team who carried out the mission briefed President Barack Obama. According to those in the room, the SEAL team commander explained to the president, "If you took one person out of the puzzle, we wouldn't have the competence to do the job we did; everybody's vital. It's not about the guy who pulled the trigger to kill bin Laden, it's about what we all did together."
http://edition.cnn.com/2013/03/26/world/bergen-who-killed-bin-laden/index.html 

Wednesday, March 27, 2013

Lower Your Cholesterol, Increase Your Diabetes Risk By 48%


The Rumor Mill News Reading Room 

Lower Your Cholesterol, Increase Your Diabetes Risk By 48%
Posted By: Dquixote1217 [Send E-Mail]
Date: Wednesday, 27-Mar-2013 20:55:58

by Sayer Ji
(The Best Years in Life) A recent year study, published in the Archives of Internal Medicine, found that the cholesterol lowering drugs known as statins increase the risk of diabetes within postmenopausal women by 48%.
This finding adds to a growing body of clinical evidence that statin drugs are fundamentally diabetogenic, which is not surprising considering the National Library of Medicine contains peer-reviewed, published research on over 300 other known adverse effects associated with their use.
Read More:
http://www.tbyil.com/Lower_Cholesterol_Higher_Diabetes_Risk_Sayer_Ji.htm
See also:
"Prominent heart doctor exposes the myths about cholesterol, statins and low fat diets"
http://www.tbyil.com/Statins_Cholesterol_Low-Fat_Diet_Myths.htm
"A brief discussion of the high cholesterol myth and the dangers of statin drugs"
http://www.tbyil.com/Cholesterol_Statin_Discussion.htm

Sheldan Nidle Update 3-26-13 by kauilapele

New post on Kauilapele's Blog



Sheldan Nidle Update 3-26-13

paoweb_globegrid34paoweb_globegrid33Highlights
·       We have worked hard to create a working alliance between our sacred secret allies and ourselves, and this union has produced a new monetary system and secured huge amounts of unaccounted-for gold and silver to back the new financial system.*
·       ...a new international system of governance is shortly to be in effect.
·       ...a series of celestial events will terminate that agreement [between the Light and the dark], taking with it the conditions which hold you in thrall to limited consciousness. This sequence of events is now underway and will shortly allow a new era on your world to begin.
·       Because of [the dark's] utter recalcitrance they leave Heaven with no choice but to remove them from further involvement in Earth affairs.
·       Neither Heaven nor we have announced these times of disclosure and change, but this divine event does not need to be known in order for it to happen.
·       A large array of Alliance craft sits just beyond the outer confines of your solar system awaiting your return to full consciousness, so be ready and know that a grand shift in your reality is at hand!
·       ...many of you may be shocked when the new governance ends this contrived economic oppression.
·       The dark drew you into their realm nearly 13 millennia ago, bringing you misery, slavery, and an ever-increasing amount of despair. Now these times are over!
·       Heaven instructed us to look at the selected days ahead and prepare a message to be given by our sacred associates. They are now setting them up and will announce them shortly.
·       ...our associates are to broadcast a series of special messages that will set the stage for our appearances before you. We will appear all across the planet...
·       At the duly appointed time, Gaia intends to join you in your moment of transformation and integrate herself into a single, unified, magnificent realm of Light!
·       Your galaxy is in need of special exercises and miracles which are to transform it forever.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sheldan Nidle Update 3-26-13
5 Men, 3 Mac, 9 Eb
Dratzo! We return! We come to explain what we are currently doing and why it has not yet manifested. As you can clearly see around you, the dark's minions are still in power across this precious globe. We have worked hard to create a working alliance between our sacred secret allies and ourselves, and this union has produced a new monetary system and secured huge amounts of unaccounted-for gold and silver to back the new financial system. In addition, we laid the foundation for a new banking system and set up the legal instruments that terminate the tyranny of the large private banks, as it is vital that this global, octopus-like institution be no longer able to suck the life out of your world's economies. Furthermore, a new international system of governance is shortly to be in effect. The final arbiter of all things connected to this scenario is Heaven. The agreement between the Light and the dark that was put into effect some 13 millennia ago is winding down and a series of celestial events will terminate that agreement, taking with it the conditions which hold you in thrall to limited consciousness. This sequence of events is now underway and will shortly allow a new era on your world to begin.
Read more...

US Citizens Defined as Property of the Government


US Citizens Defined as Property of the Government

Huge thanx again to AK- you rock guy!

US CITIZENS DEFINED AS PROPERTY OF THE GOVERNMENT


This UCC document appeared on one of the Skype chats yesterday, it seemed familar to one mentioned to me by a very connected financial person.  The UCC filing statement from 2011raised 14.3 Trillion in money under the Obama Administration by using the the people of the United States as “property improvement” capital on the land for purposes of collateral. Essentially they sold you for 14.3 Trillion dollars in borrowed funds.  This is quite separate from the birth certificate bonds.

I contacted the financial person and they provided me with President Clinton’s 1997 Presidential Order, publicly defining the people of the United States as “Property Improvements” on the land of the United States.  You can’t file a UCC on property, but you can file on property improvements. 

This defining people as property has been going on since the 1930s but was only declared publicly in 1997 by President Clinton. 

Here’s the quote from  my anonymous contact:
The UCC-1 filing that you posted is related to this matter however, The executive order specifically mentioning publicly that we are Human Capital was Executive Order No. 13037 March 4, 1997 (specifically section 2 subsection ( b ) ). Prior to this the registrations of birth was secretly used in order to create a ‘Bond’ or debt on each individual. This has been taking place since 1933 in private.

Attempted Patent of Human Embodiment by Bank of America and VISA INTL


Attempted Patent of Human Embodiment by Bank of America and VISA INTL

This is just the rough information for you all- we felt the need to get it out immediately and we’ll go back after the show tonight to pretty it up and fill in some blanks.
THIS is why the PTW have been freaking out.  The OPPT stomped on their attempts to Patent HUMANS as “tech”!!!!!!!
A HUGE thank you to AK and Brian for pulling this all together from Heathers skype notes that I quickly emailed to them….. because I was making lasagna, lol!!
*side note*  Within 10 minutes of Heather posting all this info to us on skype, her internet went down and has been bouncing on and off every few minutes since then……. Sorry Dude’s who are listening in for the PTW, you’re all   TOOOO FREAKIN’ LATE!!!!!!!    Your bosses are already foreclosed on and you are about to be jobless, AND…….  We already have all the info into the public’s eye!!!!!!   Nice try though! ;>)
……buhhahahahahhahahahh!!!!!!!   I love it when a plan comes together!!!!

ATTEMPTED PATENT OF HUMAN EMBODIMENT
BY BANK OF AMERICA AND VISA INTL

3:28:11 PM] HEATHER PEOPLES TRUST: this was just sent to me, or rather, I just received it (Giggle)
[3:28:15 PM] HEATHER PEOPLES TRUST:
[3:27 PM] HEATHER PEOPLES TRUST:
<<< [9:27 AM] G: 

<<< Hi Heather, Is the UVE based on US patent number 20120233072 A1?
does Visa International. Still hold the patent or was it released with all UCC filings?
[3:28:44 PM] HEATHER PEOPLES TRUST: [12:26:09 PM] Jarrafusa: http://www.google.com/patents/US20120233072
[12:26:22 PM] Jarrafusa: Very interesting…isn’t it
[3:31:12 PM] HEATHER PEOPLES TRUST: [3:30 PM] HEATHER PEOPLES TRUST:
<<< So the Universal Value Exchange that you and Caleb brought forward has nothing to do to with that suggested UVE patent by Visa? 

Nope…the first I knew of it was now…because of you bringing it forth…very interesting indeed. (Star)
[12:31:20 PM] Jarrafusa: the purported patent that is
[3:35:10 PM] HEATHER PEOPLES TRUST: and meet the man who purportedly helped bank of america/visa “patent” “ownership” of the embodiment prior to OPPT going in and taking it all back to Source…
[3:35:13 PM] HEATHER PEOPLES TRUST: http://www.linkedin.com/in/mattcalman
[3:35:36 PM] HEATHER PEOPLES TRUST: no wonder they were/are soooooo nervous
[3:36:01 PM] HEATHER PEOPLES TRUST: thank you G for shining the light of Absolute Truth on that data!
[3:37:22 PM] HEATHER PEOPLES TRUST: D can you get that all out please for all to know why the PTW are afraid of eternal essence embodied BE’ing and DO’ing?
[3:37:44 PM] HEATHER PEOPLES TRUST: awesome….i love ABSOLUTE DATA! (Music)(Winking)(Music)
[3:38:11 PM] HEATHER PEOPLES TRUST: The mechanics and who was operating them are becoming ABSOLUTELY VISIBLE!!!!!
[3:52:42 PM] HEATHER PEOPLES TRUST: please do not print G’s full skype handle
[3:52:49 PM] *** Call from HEATHER PEOPLES TRUST, duration 00:54. ***
[3:54:01 PM] HEATHER PEOPLES TRUST: OHHHHHhhhhhh yes!  DATA!
[3:54:07 PM] HEATHER PEOPLES TRUST: ABSOLUTE CONTEXT!
[4:07:39 PM] HEATHER PEOPLES TRUST: AND HERE ARE THE PATENT CITATIONS FOR THE “EMBODIMENT PATENT APPLICATION” FROM JANUARY 2012:

union states assembly call tonight


REMINDER: union states assembly call tonight 03/27/2013 9:00 PM est.
9:00 PM eastern  218-895-0970  pin 396109#

For those without unlimited free phone time, you may also listen in at http://www.talkshoe.com/talkshoe/web/talkCast.jsp?masterId=124598&cmd=tc LISTED AS unionstates. There you can communicate via the chat board as well.
Please join us - AND bring a friend
Tonight's agenda: - Divided into three segments:
 Segment 1.  Identify and recruit capable people in each of the original 13 states who will help organize a group of fellow state inhabitants to bring their lawful State government back and give Lawful Notice to the world.
Segment 2.  Identify and recruit capable people in each of the remaining states who will help organize a group of fellow state inhabitants to bring their lawful State government back and give Lawful Notice to the world.
Segment 3. Only after the above business is completed will other issues regarding the completion of this project will be discussed - just be patient if you have a topic relative to the completion of this project needing to be brought forward - you WILL be heard.

Here are some past recordings that will help introduce your friends to the union states project:  
800-858-6563 – 8 minute telephone introduction to union states.

http://www.unionstatesproject.info/ - A 50 minute audio overview and explanation of the union state project.
http://www.unionstatesproject.org/ - union state website containing documents and archived recordings of our assembly meetings.
Utube describing union states project
union states email:   info@unionstatesproject.info


Wikileaks founder speaks out


Subject: Wikileaks founder speaks out

Ronald

Julian Assange of Wikileaks is
still stuck in the Ecuadorean
Embassy in London.

Meanwhile fake "journalists"
run free.

Here he gets a chance to
explain himself.

We should all be interested
in what he has to say.

Video:


- Brasscheck

P.S. Please share Brasscheck TV e-mails and videos with friends and colleagues.

That's how we grow. Thanks.

================================

Visit out partner sites:

The Real Food Channel: http://RealFoodChannel.com The truth about the food you eat

Real Econ TV: http://RealEconTV.com
Financial news without the big bank baloney

Jazz on the Tube: http://JazzontheTube.com Take a jazz break

================================
Brasscheck TV
2380 California St.
San Francisco, CA 94115

To unsubscribe or change subscriber options visit:

Where Do Millionaires Invest Their Cash to Keep It Safe?


Subj: Where Do Millionaires Invest Their Cash to Keep It Safe?

Where Do Millionaires Invest There Cash To Keep it Safe posted at OOM by SpecialAgentGibbs

03/27/2013
Where Do Millionaires Invest Their Cash to Keep It Safe?

By Joshua Kennon

I’ve been having a conversion about investing and money with the reader “Frat Man” in the comments section of another post. He asked:

I also had one other question I have always wondered. Where do millionaires keep their money? In the sense that FDIC insurance only covers $250,000 at the bank and SIPC only covers $500,000 at the brokerage. I mean, I can’t see Bill Gates putting $250,000 at thousands of banks across the country, nor can I imagine Lou Simpson’s net worth getting wiped down to half a million because of a bankrupt Scottrade. Ha! So when people accumulate millions, what becomes the “safe spot” to keep it?
,,
Read More Link on Right
Monopoly When I went to hit “reply” in the comments section, I realized that it was nearly 1,500 words so I thought it might be better to just post it as its own in the event some of you were interested in where billionaires and millionaires like Bill Gates or Lou Simpson invest their cash. It really has nothing to do with beginners, otherwise I could have gotten an About.com article out of it, but it might still interest those of you who are curious about these sorts of things.

Here is my answer …

Where Do Millionaires Park Their Cash?

First, you have to realize that “money” in one sense doesn’t exist. It is an idea. If you are talking about the green pieces of paper the Treasury department prints, there is only about $575 billion in circulation yet household assets in the United States are valued at more than $50 trillion.
http://
Think about that. If you owned every single United States dollar bill in the entire world, you would only have 1/100th of the estimated household net worth in the United States. The reason: Those greenbacks are merely an exchange mechanism. They represent something that people can trade to signify a claim check on society. In and of themselves they have no value. We could have just as easily chosen sea shells or jars of strawberry jam. The reason societies have preferred gold and silver over time is they are difficult to mine, so it is very hard for governments, politicians, kings and presidents to make the currency worthless by printing more paper.

The result is that most wealth isn’t held in the form of cash. In fact, I think of money as being held in seven distinct forms (there are more but these are the major ones):

    Business ownership (stocks). If you own a chain of dry cleaners that makes $1 million a year in profit, you could probably sell the company for between $10 million and $15 million. You don’t have that money “sitting” anywhere, but it is yours nonetheless.

    Money they have loaned and must be repaid to them in the future such as bonds, certificates of deposit, money parked in bank accounts, and money invested in money market funds.

    Real estate, such as hotels, apartments, stadiums, homes, storage units, bridges, etc.

    Commodities such as gold, silver, platinum, corn, cattle, mineral rights, oil, natural gas, sugar, coffee, etc.

    Nominal currencies, such as United States dollars, Euros, Yen, and British Pound Sterling stuffed in envelopes or briefcases.

    Intellectual property, such as ownership rights to famous songs, books, movies, and photographs. If you owned the rights to Star Wars, you could have no money in the bank but the truth is, you are probably a billionaire because you could sell those rights to a lot of interested investors; they, in turn, could create new merchandise and products and make money from it, which is why they are willing to pay you. Brand names are a huge source of intellectual property value, such as Coca-Cola, Clorox, Wrigley, Hershey’s, and Folgers.

    Tangible property, such as famous paintings, historical artifacts, rare books, etc. If you owned an original, signed copy of the Declaration of Independence, you could convert it into any other form of wealth you wanted, such as nominal currency, which you could then use to transfer your wealth into real estate, or commodities, or any of the other categories.

That means that most of the time, someone with substantial net worth doesn’t need to park their money in a checking account. You couldn’t steal Bill Gates’ $50+ billion from him because it isn’t money in a briefcase; it is office buildings, shares of stock, railroads, book copyrights, personal real estate, private jets, rare art … the list is endless.

Don’t Think of “Money” As Being Cash

This may help explain the perspective of an investor…

It is estimated that there are 1,348,528,420,000 barrels of oil in the ground that have a 90% or greater probability of being drilled and recovered by humans (called “proven reserves”). The current spot price of crude oil is roughly $73. That means that all of the oil in the ground is worth an estimated $98,442,574,660,000. Let’s round up and call it $100 trillion.

(For now, let’s ignore the obvious fact that if this oil was harvested at once, oil would be worth about 50 cents a barrel because the supply would grossly exceed the demand. At current consumption rates, that is enough oil to meet world demand for 54 years. )

That means if you were to suddenly inherit 100,000 barrels of oil, you would be worth $7,300,000 at today’s market prices (100,000 barrels x $73 per barrel = $7.3 million).

If oil rose to $100 per barrel, your assets would rise to $10,000,000. You are now worth an extra $2.7 million! Where did it come from and where is it parked? Nowhere. It is the estimated liquidation value of your oil if you choose to sell right now and the market has enough demand to fill your order without the price falling. You are quoting the value in dollars because, as a United States citizen, those dollars mean something to you. You inherently understand the value of $5 and what it will buy you compared to $20.
http://
If the United States government began to print money so it became worthless, and a loaf of bread that originally cost $5 is now $10,000, your oil may be trading at $146,000 per barrel even though you have gained nothing in purchasing power, giving you an asset value of $14.6 billion. The thing is, your purchasing power would be the same because:

$14,600,000,000 would buy 1,460,000 loaves of bread if each loaf was $10,000 just like

$7,300,000 would buy 1,460,000 loaves of bread if each loaf was $5

That means that, measured in bread as an exchange, the government printing money didn’t have an influence on your actual purchasing power. You can still buy the same loaves of bread as you could before hyper-inflation. This is one of the reasons famous investor Warren Buffett talks about the importance of measuring gains in your net worth in “how many cheeseburgers you can buy”. Purchasing power counts. Not dollars.

What Do The Rich Do With Their Cash?

If you are specifically interested in what the rich do with their short-term cash, comparable to the middle class putting money in a checking or savings account, there are several popular alternatives to those with at least a few million dollars:

Establishing a so-called zero-balance account. The rich investor has his or her money in bonds, certificates of deposit, commercial paper and other highly liquid debt instruments. They write checks out of the account, which has $0 in it, and at the end of the business day, the private bank sells off enough of the highly stable, liquid investments to wipe out the negative balance in the account, bringing it back to $0. That way, if the bank fails, it doesn’t hurt the investor because the underlying assets are held in his or her name, not the name of the institution. (This service is known as custody or, in some cases, global custody. The banks will charge a small fee for it as a percentage of assets in most cases.) Almost every intelligent rich person on the planet uses some form of global custody because you don’t want to worry about losing your shirt because a broker failed.

Parking the money directly with the United States Treasury in an account backed by the taxing power of the United States government. They can buy short-term Treasury bills and keep rolling them over until they need the money. Unless the United States goes bankrupt by hyper-inflating, they are safe. Buffett literally has tens of billions of dollars of Berkshire Hathaway’s money parked in Treasury bills, bonds and notes at times. There is no risk of default or bankruptcy unless the entire nation goes bust!

Physically holding cash in multiple currencies in safe deposit boxes throughout the world. These aren’t insured, though, so there is that risk.

I hope that helps you understand how a lot of private banks such as Northern Trust think about parking money for millionaires and other rich investors.

The Icelandic Revolution and the New World Order


The Icelandic Revolution and the New World Order

Tuesday, March 26, 2013 12:48
  
The Icelandic Revolution and the New World Order
Our ruling crime families are quite flexible when it comes to making allowances for societal differences in culture, religion and mentality. They are also reasonably accommodating to individual inclinations of the local ‘elite’. However they can get quite nasty in cases where a country’s leadership openly refuses to take orders. In most cases, those countries are quickly brought back under control through a variety of measures. Blackmail, murder disguised as accidents and acts of terrorism are just the beginning. If they don’t work those countries and their leadership see themselves quickly vilified and internationally isolated as ‘rogue states’, and their economies systematically destroyed. If that doesn’t do the job either, an international coalition of countries will sooner or later rape and pillage them under some flimsy ‘humanitarian’ pretext.
One country that doesn’t seem to fit into this grim picture though is Iceland. Many observers in the dissident media scene rave about what they call the ‘Icelandic revolution’. They fret about the media blackout that won't report how the Icelandic people have managed to free themselves from the dictate of the likes of the IMF, revive the economy and jail the banksters who almost destroyed their economy. What those writers fail to consider is why our ruling crime families allowed events to go their natural cause. Why haven’t they – as they normally would – coerced the Icelandic leadership into compliance with unsavory scandals, murder and acts of terrorism? Why haven’t they destroyed Iceland yet with H.A.A.R.P. induced earthquakes and volcano outbreaks? And why do they still invite the Icelandic prime minister to international meets such as Davos instead of portraying him in the media as the next worst thing to Iranian President Ahmadinejad?
We know that our ruling parasites like to experiment with different societal models. North Korea is a good example. Here our self-chosen rulers test how badly you can oppress a society, before they start to revolt. In places like Scandinavia they try out how the sheeple will behave if it is provided with a good life. And in Singapore they experiment how hard you can push humans to maximum performance as long as you take well care of their basic needs such as affordable housing, food, health and education. Those experiments go way beyond the usual local adjustments. They are about finding out how to get the most out of their farm animals. But why on earth would they want to run a field test to see what happens if they allow things to go their natural way?
The answer has probably something to do with the fact that our ruling crime families don’t agree on everything. Behind the scenes there is a lot of backstabbing and leaks embarrassing each other seem to be a favorite pastime. That’s why the locations and agendas of the annual Bilderberg conferences cannot be kept secret. Obviously not everyone in the ‘ruling elite’ agrees with the New World Order agenda of enslaving mankind and culling 95% of us to make room for the ‘elite’ to enjoy eternal life. They might not have the power to stop the likes of Prince Phillip and Evelyn Rothschild, but they have the means to sabotage and at least slow down their evil agenda in very effective ways.
The tightly contained hands-off experiment in Iceland – in my opinion – is intended as a stark warning to those elements within our ‘ruling elite’ and their minions who secretly sabotage the New World Order agenda. It demonstrates to them how quickly things can turn nasty for them, if they don’t play along. It’s up to us to convince them that it is in their best interest to stop the madness before it’s too late.
Rebel of Oz is the editor and publisher of dissident news and analysis site The Rebel. You can find more of his writings on https://therebel.org/editorial.
Source: The Rebel