Saturday, June 1, 2013

“The IRS appears to be a money laundry, extortion racket, and conspiracy to engage in a pattern of racketeering activity…



This is a message I sent to a Navy squadron mate who is now a CPA/tax accountant after we got into a discussion of the income tax during a brief visit at Christmas time.

I had hoped that Chuck would respond and show me the error of my assertions if I were wrong about the conclusions I had reached regarding the income tax. Unfortunately, I received no response.



 
Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2012 5:12 PM
To: XXXX
Subject: What you don’t know about the IRS and the federal income tax will shock you



This is to follow up on our abbreviated discussion regarding the fraudulent status of the federal income tax. It is not a simple matter to unravel, but you cannot fairly examine this information without concluding that the income tax is a major hoax perpetrated against the American people. A progressive income tax was also one of the key items on the Communist Party agenda for its plan to destroy the American constitutional republic.

There are many other well-researched sources to confirm everything contained in the document excerpted below, created by Paul Mitchell.  I challenge you to prove that anything included here is incorrect. Can you point me to the law that requires payment of an income tax or filing of an income tax return? You will find that every purported “rule” in the IRS publications is an obfuscation designed to mislead you into believing that you have an income tax liability when, in fact, no such liability exists.

The Founders provided for adequate revenues to support the limited federal government authorized by the Constitution. In fact, the federal government was running surpluses right up until the adoption of the income tax. The bankers wanted the income tax and the Federal Reserve System for their own purposes, not to provide needed revenue for government services.  (Please read “The Creature from Jekyll Island” by G. Edward Griffin for more on this insidious conspiracy.)

The problem is that the left began its assault on the Constitution over one hundred years ago, gradually but relentlessly building a federal government leviathan that is now unmanageable and unsustainable, and one that pursues increased control over the daily lives of our citizens without restraint. Where this all leads is frightening to contemplate, and we are clearly running out of time to avoid a worst-case scenario.

You pointed out that I am one of the beneficiaries of this system by virtue of my Social Security benefits. Well, I will not be held hostage by this Communist scheme. I will gladly sacrifice those benefits in return for a restoration of the United States Constitution.




What you don’t know about the IRS and the federal income tax will shock you
“The IRS appears to be a money laundry, extortion racket, and conspiracy to engage in a pattern of racketeering activity… There are no statutes that create a specific liability for federal income taxes… the Internal Revenue Code has never been enacted into positive law, and the code is so deliberately vague as to render it  unconstitutional under the Sixth Amendment…and the purported Sixteenth Amendment is demonstrably fraudulent.”
Excerpted from:   “31 Questions and Answers about the Internal Revenue Service” by Paul A. Mitchell

The IRS is not an organization within the United States Department of the Treasury

In the case of Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281 (1979), the U.S. Supreme Court admitted that no organic Act for the IRS could be found, after they searched for such an Act all the way back to the Civil War, which ended in the year 1865 A.D…

The IRS appears to be a collection agency working for foreign banks and operating out of Puerto Rico under color of the Federal Alcohol Administration (“FAA”).  But the FAA was promptly declared unconstitutional inside the 50 States by the U.S. Supreme Court in the case of U.S. v. Constantine, 296 U.S. 287 (1935), because Prohibition had already been repealed…

When all the evidence is examined objectively, IRS appears to be a money laundry, extortion racket, and conspiracy to engage in a pattern of racketeering activity, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1951 and 1961 et seq. (“RICO”)…Administrative Procedures Act.  The governments of all federal Territories are expressly excluded from Act of Congress, nor any Executive Order, giving IRS lawful jurisdiction to operate within any of the 50 States of the Union…

Deceptive nomenclature (showing “Department of the Treasury” on outgoing IRS mail) is intended to convey the false impression that IRS is a lawful bureau or department within the U.S. Department of the Treasury

The IRS is not an “agency” as that term is legally defined in the Freedom of Information Act or in the Administrative Procedures Act.  The governments of all federal Territories are expressly excluded from the definition of federal “agency” by Act of Congress.  See 5 U.S.C. 551(1)(C). Since IRS is domiciled in Puerto Rico (RICO?), it is thereby excluded from the definition of federal agencies which can be represented by the DOJ…

Neither (the Fourteenth nor the Sixteenth Amendment) was properly ratified.  In the case of People v. Boxer (December 1992), docket number #S-030016, U.S. Senator Barbara Boxer fell totally silent in the face of an Application to the California Supreme Court by the People of California, for an ORDER compelling Senator Boxer to witness the material evidence against the so-called 16th amendment…

The so‑called sixteenth “amendment” allegedly authorized federal income taxation, even though it contains no provision expressly repealing two Constitutional Clauses mandating that direct taxes must be apportioned.  The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and the U.S. Supreme Court have both ruled that repeals by implication are not favored.

The so‑called 16th amendment has now been correctly identified as a major fraud upon the American People and the United States…

Similarly, the so-called 14th amendment was never properly ratified either.  In the case of Dyett v. Turner, 439 P.2d  266, 270 (1968), the Utah Supreme Court recited numerous historical facts proving, beyond any shadow of a doubt, that the so‑called 14th amendment was likewise a major fraud upon the American People...
Judging by the sheer amount of litigation its various sections have generated, particularly Section 1, the so‑called 14th amendment is one of the worst pieces of legislation ever written in American history…
______________________________________________________________________________________
There are no statutes that create a specific liability for federal income taxes.
Section 1 of the Internal Revenue Code (“IRC”) contains no provisions creating a specific liability for taxes imposed by subtitle AAside from the statutes which apply only to federal government employees, pursuant to the Public Salary Tax Act, the only other statutes that create a specific liability for federal income taxes are those itemized in the definition of “Withholding agent” at IRC section 7701(a)(16).  For example, see IRC section 1461.  A separate liability statute for “employment” taxes imposed by subtitle C is found at IRC section 3403.
After a worker authorizes a payroll officer to withhold taxes, typically by completing Form W‑4, the payroll officer then becomes a withholding agent who is legally and specifically liable for payment of all taxes withheld from that worker’s paycheck.  Until such time as those taxes are paid in full into the Treasury of the United States, the withholding agent is the only party who is legally liable for those taxes, not the worker.  See IRC section 7809 (“Treasury of the United States”).
If the worker opts instead to complete a Withholding Exemption Certificate, consistent with IRC section 3402(n), the payroll officer is not thereby authorized to withhold any federal income taxes.  In this latter situation, there is absolutely no liability for the worker or for the payroll officer;  in other words, there is no liability PERIOD, specifically because there is no withholding agent.

Federal regulations do not and can not create an income tax liability for any class of people.
The regulations at 26 CFR 1.1-1 attempted to create a specific liability for all “citizens of the United States” and all “residents of the United States”.  However, those regulations correspond to IRC section 1, which does not create a specific liability for taxes imposed by subtitle ATherefore, these regulations are an overly broad extension of the underlying statutory authority; as such, they are unconstitutional, null and void ab initio (from the beginning).  The Acker case cited above held that federal regulations cannot exceed the underlying statutory authority.

Conflicting provisions of the Constitution and the 1866 Civil Rights Act, together with the non-ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment, have resulted in the existence of two classes of citizens within the United States.  
There are two (2) classes of citizens:  State Citizens and federal citizens.  The first class originates in the Qualifications Clauses in the U.S. Constitution, where the term “Citizen of the United States” is used.  (See 1:2:2, 1:3:3 and 2:1:5.)  Notice the UPPER CASE “C” in “Citizen”.
The pertinent court cases have defined the term “United States” in these Clauses to mean “States United”, and the full term means “Citizen of ONE OF the States United”.  See People v. De La Guerra, 40 Cal. 311, 337 (1870);  Judge Pablo De La Guerra signed the California Constitution of 1849, when California first joined the Union. 
Similar terms are found in the Diversity Clause at Article III, Section 2, Clause 1, and in the Privileges and Immunities Clause at Article IV, Section 2, Clause 1
Prior to the Civil War, there was only one (1) class of Citizens under American Law.  See the holding in Pannill v. Roanoke, 252 F. 910, 914‑915 (1918), for definitive authority on this key point.
The second class originates in the 1866 Civil Rights Act, where the term “citizen of the United States” is used.  This Act was later codified at 42 U.S.C. 1983.  Notice the lower-case “c” in “citizen”.  The pertinent court cases have held that Congress thereby created a municipal franchise primarily for members of the Negro race, who were freed by President Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation (a war measure), and later by the Thirteenth Amendment banning slavery and involuntary servitude.  Compelling payment of a “tax” for which there is no liability statute is tantamount to involuntary servitude, and extortion.
Instead of using the unique term “federal citizen”, as found in Black’s Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition, it is now clear that the Radical Republicans who sponsored the 1866 Civil Rights Act were attempting to confuse these two classes of citizens.  Then, they attempted to elevate this second class to constitutional status, by proposing a 14th amendment to the U.S. Constitution.  As we now know, that proposal was never ratified.
Numerous court cases have struggled to clarify the important differences between the two classes.  One of the most definitive, and dispositive cases, is Pannill v. Roanoke, 252 F. 910, 914‑915 (1918), which clearly held that federal citizens had no standing to sue under the Diversity Clause, because they were not even contemplated when Article III in the U.S. Constitution was first being drafted, circa 1787 A.D.
 Another is Ex parte Knowles, 5 Cal. 300 (1855) in which the California Supreme Court ruled that there was no such thing as a “citizen of the United States” (as of the year 1855 A.D.).  Only federal citizens have standing to invoke 42 U.S.C. 1983;  whereas State Citizens do not.  See Wadleigh v. Newhall, 136 F. 941 (C.C. Cal. 1905).
Many more cases can be cited to confirm the existence of two classes of citizens under American Law.  These cases are thoroughly documented in the book entitled “The Federal Zone: Cracking the Code of Internal Revenue” by Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S., now in its eleventh edition.  See also the pleadings in the case of USA v. Gilbertson, also in the Supreme Law Library.

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in the Brushaber case that the income tax which is the subject of the purported Sixteenth Amendment is an indirect tax (“excise”) subject to the restriction of Article I Section 8 of the United States Constitution that such tax ”shall be uniform throughout the United States” as a result of a voluntary act resulting in the application of the tax. Thus the enforcement by the IRS of the income tax as an unapportioned direct tax is unquestionably unconstitutional.
Frank Brushaber was the Plaintiff in the case of Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, 240 U.S. 1 (1916), the first U.S. Supreme Court case to consider the so‑called 16th amendment.  Brushaber identified himself as a Citizen of New York State and a resident of the Borough of Brooklyn, in the city of New York, and nobody challenged that claim. The Union Pacific Railroad Company was a federal corporation created by Act of Congress to build a railroad through Utah (from the Union to the Pacific), at a time when Utah was a federal Territory, i.e. inside the federal zone.
Brushaber’s attorney committed an error by arguing that the company had been chartered by the State of Utah, but Utah was not a State of the Union when Congress first created that corporation. Brushaber had purchased stock issued by the company.  He then sued the company to recover taxes that Congress had imposed upon the dividends paid to its stockholders
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled against Frank Brushaber, and upheld the tax as a lawful excise, or indirect tax.
The most interesting result of the Court’s ruling was a Treasury Decision (“T.D.”) that the U.S. Department of the Treasury later issued as a direct consequence of the high Court’s opinion.  In T.D. 2313, the U.S. Treasury Department expressly cited the Brushaber decision, and it identified Frank Brushaber as a “nonresident alien” and the Union Pacific Railroad Company as a “domestic corporation”.  This Treasury Decision has never been modified or repealed.
T.D. 2313 is crucial evidence proving that the income tax provisions of the IRC are municipal law, with no territorial jurisdiction inside the 50 States of the Union.  The U.S. Secretary of the Treasury who approved T.D. 2313 had no authority to extend the holding in the Brushaber case to anyone or anything not a proper Party to that court action.
Thus, there is no escaping the conclusion that Frank Brushaber was the nonresident alien to which that Treasury Decision refers.  Accordingly, all State Citizens are nonresident aliens with respect to the municipal jurisdiction of Congress, i.e. the federal zone.

The term “income” is not defined in the Internal Revenue Code, but the U.S. Supreme Court has defined income as “profit or gain derived from corporate activities”.

The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that the term “income” is not defined anywhere in the IRC:  “The general term ‘income’ is not defined in the Internal Revenue Code.”  U.S. v. Ballard, 535 F.2d 400, 404 (8th Circuit, 1976).
Moreover, in Mark Eisner v. Myrtle H. Macomber, 252 U.S. 189 (1920), the High Court told Congress it could not legislate any definition of “income” because that term was believed to be in the U.S. Constitution.  The Eisner case was predicated on the ratification of the 16th amendment, which would have introduced the term “income” into the U.S. Constitution for the very first time (but only if that amendment had been properly ratified).
In Merchant's Loan & Trust Co. v. Smietanka, 255 U.S. 509 (1921), the high Court defined “income” to mean the profit or gain derived from corporate activities.  In that instance, the tax is a lawful excise tax imposed upon the corporate privilege of limited liability, i.e. the liabilities of a corporation do not reach its officers, employees, directors or stockholders.


The income tax provisions of the Internal Revenue Code are “municipal law” (applicable only to the District of Columbia, Guam, Virgin Islands, American Samoa, and Puerto Rico); Title 26 of the United States Code (the location of the IRC) has never been enacted into positive law; and the code is so deliberately vague as to render it  unconstitutional under the Sixth Amendment of the Bill of Rights.

The IRC’s income tax provisions are municipal law.  Municipal law is law that is enacted to govern the internal affairs of a sovereign State;  in legal circles, it is also known as Private International Law.  Under American Law, it has a much wider meaning than the ordinances enacted by the governing body of a municipality, i.e. city council or county board of supervisors.  In fact, American legal encyclopedias define “municipal” to mean “internal”, and for this reason alone, the Internal Revenue Code is really a Municipal Revenue Code.
A mountain of additional evidence has now been assembled and published in the book “The Federal Zone” to prove that the IRC’s income tax provisions are municipal law. One of the most famous pieces of evidence is a letter from a Connecticut Congresswoman, summarizing the advice of legal experts employed by the Congressional Research Service and the Legislative Counsel.  Their advice confirmed that the meaning of “State” at IRC section 3121(e) is restricted to the named territories and possessions of D.C., Guam, Virgin Islands, American Samoa, and Puerto Rico.
 In other words, the term “State” in that statute, and in all similar federal statutes, includes ONLY the places expressly named, and no more.
The general rule is that federal government powers must be expressed and enumerated.  For example, the U.S. Constitution is a grant of enumerated powers.  If a power is not enumerated in the U.S. Constitution, then Congress does not have any authority to exercise that power.  This rule is tersely expressed in the Ninth Amendment, in the Bill of Rights. If California is not mentioned in any of the federal income tax statutes, then those statutes have no force or effect within that State.  This is also true of all 50 States.
Strictly speaking, the omission or exclusion of anyone or anything from a federal statute can be used to infer that the omission or exclusion was intentional by Congress.  In Latin, this is tersely stated as follows:  Inclusio unius est exclusio alterius.  In English, this phrase is literally translated:  Inclusion of one thing is the exclusion of all other things [that are not mentioned].  This phrase can be found in any edition of Black’s Law Dictionary;  it is a maxim of statutory construction.
The many different definitions of the term “State” that are found in federal laws are intentionally written to appear as if they include the 50 States PLUS the other places mentioned.  As the legal experts in Congress have now confirmed, this is NOT the correct way to interpret, or to construct, these statutes. If a place is not mentioned, every American may correctly infer that the omission of that place from a federal statute was an intentional act of Congress.  Whenever it wants to do so, Congress knows how to define the term “United States” to mean the 50 States of the Union.  See IRC section 4612(a)(4)(A).

Federal income tax revenues are NOT used to pay for any government services.
The money trail is very difficult to follow, in this instance, because the IRS is technically a trust with a domicile in Puerto Rico.  See 31 U.S.C. 1321(a)(62). 
As such, their records are protected by laws which guarantee the privacy of trust records within that territorial jurisdiction, provided that the trust is not also violating the Sherman Antitrust Act. They are technically not an “agency” of the federal government, as that term is defined in the Freedom of Information Act and in the Administrative Procedures Act.  The governments of the federal territories are expressly excluded from the definition of “agency” in those Acts of Congress.  See 5 U.S.C. 551(1)(C).
All evidence indicates that they are a money laundry, extortion racket, and conspiracy to engage in a pattern of racketeering activity, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1951 and 1961 et seq.
They appear to be laundering huge sums of money into foreign banks, mostly in Europe, and quite possibly into the Vatican.  See the national policy on money laundering at 31 U.S.C. 5341.
The final report of the Grace Commission, convened under President Ronald Reagan, quietly admitted that none of the funds they collect from federal income taxes goes to pay for any federal government services.  The Grace Commission found that those funds were being used to pay for interest on the federal debt, and income transfer payments to beneficiaries of entitlement programs like federal pension plans.
______________________________________________________________________________________
HOW SOME STATES DID NOT LEGALLY
RATIFY THE 16TH AMENDMENT
Bill Benson's findings, published in "The Law That Never Was," make a convincing case that the 16th amendment was not legally ratified and that Secretary of State Philander Knox was not merely in error, but committed fraud when he declared it ratified in February 1913.
What follows is a summary of some of the major findings for many of the states, showing that their ratifications were not legal and should not have been counted.
The 16th amendment had been sent out in 1909 to the state governors for ratification by the state legislatures after having been passed by Congress. There were 48 states at that time, and three-fourths, or 36, of them were required to give their approval in order for it to be ratified. The process took almost the whole term of the Taft administration, from 1909 to 1913.
Knox had received responses from 42 states when he declared the 16th amendment ratified on February 25, 1913, just a few days before leaving office to make way for the administration of Woodrow Wilson. Knox acknowledged that four of those states (Utah, Conn, R.I. and N.H.) had rejected it, and he counted 38 states as having approved it.
We will now examine some of the key evidence Bill Benson found regarding the approval of the amendment in many of those states.
In Kentucky, the legislature acted on the amendment without even having received it from the governor (the governor of each state was to transmit the proposed amendment to the state legislature). The version of the amendment that the Kentucky legislature made up and acted upon omitted the words "on income" from the text, so they weren't even voting on an income tax! When they straightened that out (with the help of the governor), the Kentucky senate rejected the amendment. Yet Philander Knox counted Kentucky as approving it!
In Oklahoma, the legislature changed the wording of the amendment so that its meaning was virtually the opposite of what was intended by Congress, and this was the version they sent back to Knox. Yet Knox counted Oklahoma as approving it, despite a memo from his chief legal counsel, Reuben Clark, that states were not allowed to change it in any way.
Attorneys who have studied the subject have agreed that Kentucky and Oklahoma should not have been counted as approvals by Philander Knox, and, moreover, if any state could be shown to have violated its own state constitution or laws in its approval process, then that state's approval would have to be thrown out. That gets us past the "presumptive conclusion" argument, which says that the actions of an executive official cannot be judged by a court, and admits that Knox could be wrong.
If we subtract Kentucky and Oklahoma from the 38 approvals above, the count of valid approvals falls to 36, the exact number needed for ratification. If any more states can be shown to have had invalid approvals, the 16th amendment must be regarded as null and void.
The state constitution of Tennessee prohibited the state legislature from acting on any proposed amendment to the U.S. Constitution sent by Congress until after the next election of state legislators. The intent, of course, is to give the proposed amendment a chance to become an issue in the state legislative elections so that the people can have a voice in determining the outcome. It also provides a cooling off period to reduce the tendency to approve an idea just because it happens to be the moment's trend. You've probably already guessed that the Tennessee legislature did not hold off on voting for the amendment until after the next election, and you'd be right - they didn't; hence, they acted upon it illegally before they were authorized to do so. They also violated their own state constitution by failing to read the resolution on three different days as prescribed by Article II, Section 18. These state constitutional violations make their approval of the amendment null and void. Their (Tennessee’s) approval is and was invalid, and it brings the number of approving states down to 35, one less than required for ratification.
Texas and Louisiana violated provisions in their state constitutions prohibiting the legislatures from empowering the federal government with any additional taxing authority. Now the number is down to 33.



Yahoo Tells Users: Let Us Read Your Emails or -- Goodbye!

SOME OF YOU MAY HAVE HEARD OF DR. KATHERINE ALBRECHT -  (www.katherinealbrecht.com/  and www.gaiamtv.com/KatherineAlbrecht  ARE TWO WEBSITES YOU CAN RESEARCH.  KATHERINE NOT ONLY  IS THE HOST OF HER OWN BROADCASTS,  BUT IS A FREQUENT GUEST ON OTHER BROADCASTS.   AN AVID FIGHTER FOR OUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS,  KATHERINE HAS BEEN INVOLVED IN THE PURSUIT OF EMAIL AND WEB SURFING PRIVACY.  SOME MAY KNOW HER BY THE SPONSORSHIP OF HER BROADCASTS BY IXQUICK AKA STARTPAGE.  BELOW IS AN EMAIL JUST RECEIVED FROM KATHERINE RELATING TO THE PRIVATE EMAIL SYSTEM THE COMPANY  IS IN FINAL STAGES OF PERFECTING.  YOU MAY WANT TO CONTACT THEM ABOUT IT.  THE ADDRESS IS BELOW.  


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: <info@startmail.com>
Date: Fri, May 31, 2013 at 7:57 PM
Subject: Yahoo Tells Users: Let Us Read Your Emails or -- Goodbye!
 
Email Privacy is big news this week with Yahoo giving users just 30 days to switch over to their new email platform starting June 1st.   Yahoo's new privacy policy says the company will perform "content scanning and analyzing of your communications content" on all emails sent through Yahoo accounts. Talk about abusive!  Please see our press release below for details.

The good news is that StartMail internal beta testing will begin on June 24th. As we come down the home stretch of developing a fully state-of-the-art, private email alternative, your support means more to us than ever.

We look forward to welcoming you with a trial StartMail account this Fall when our full beta launch takes place. We know you are eagerly awaiting your trial account and we appreciate your patience.  We will be sending out regular updates in the immediate days and weeks to come, so stay tuned.

If you're not yet signed up as a beta tester, you can sign up at www.StartMail.com.

This is an exciting time to be working on privacy -- and we're so glad you're on board!

Sincerely,

Dr. Katherine Albrecht and The StartMail Team





MAY 31, 2013
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Yahoo Tells Users: Let Us Read Your Emails or -- Goodbye!,
https://www.startpage.com/eng/press/yahoo-reads-your-mails.html

NEW YORK: As of June 1, all Yahoo email users are required to upgrade to the company's newest platform, which allows Yahoo to scan and analyze every email they write or receive. According to Yahoo's help page, all users who make the transition agree to let the company perform "content scanning and analyzing of your communications content" to target ads, offer products, and perform "abuse protection."

This means any message that Yahoo's algorithms find disturbing could flag a user as a bully, a threat, or worse. At the same time, Yahoo can now openly troll through email for personal information that it can share or hold onto indefinitely.
See: http://help.yahoo.com/kb/index?page=content&y=PROD_MAIL_ML&locale=en_US&id=SLN3254
Archived at: https://www.startpage.com/graphics/yahoo-mail-upgrade.jpg

Gay and haven't come out yet? Yahoo knows. Having an affair? Your spouse may not know - but Yahoo does. Any interests, ailments or projects you'd rather not share? You're sharing them with Yahoo, perhaps forever.

The new tracking policy affects more than just Yahoo account holders. Everyone who corresponds with a Yahoo email account holder will also have their own message content scanned, analyzed, and stored by Yahoo, even if they themselves have not agreed to Yahoo's new terms of service.

"Emailing through Yahoo means surrendering your privacy, whether it's your own account or your friend's," says Harvard-trained privacy expert Katherine Albrecht, who is helping to develop StartMail, an upcoming email service that will not scan its users' correspondence. "It's time we start paying attention to these policies, because they're growing more shockingly abusive every day," she added. 

Where prior versions of Yahoo had tracking policies buried in the fine print, the company's tracking agenda is now openly stated in paragraph 2: "When you upgrade you will be accepting our ...Privacy Policy." That is, its anti-privacy policy.

Concerned Yahoo users are invited to check out StartMail, a completely private email program slated for release this Fall. Anyone who would like to be a beta tester can visit StartMail (www.StartMail.com) and sign up for the upcoming release.

Rest assured: That information will not be shared with anyone at all.

Especially not Yahoo.

====




5-year-old Interrogated By School Over Toy Cap Gun Until He Wet Himself With Fear

FW:     !!!!! PSYCHO NUT JOB GOVERNMENT IS ALL THERE IS TODAY >>> 5-year-old Interrogated By School Over Toy Cap Gun Until He Wet Himself With Fear 

5-year-old Interrogated By School Over Toy Cap Gun Until He Wet Himself With Fear

Then suspended for rest of the year!!!!!!

Steve Watson
Infowars.com
May 31, 2013
Yet another child barely out of nappies has been persecuted by school officials for playing with a toy gun on the school bus.
The Washington Post reports that the five-year-old from Dowell Elementary School in Lusby, Maryland was questioned by school officials for over two hours after he showed a friend his cowboy-style cap gun on the way to school.
Officials finally called the boy’s mother when he wet his pants. The mother told the Post that she found it highly unusual that her son soiled himself, indicating that he was very intimidated.
The report states that the boy’s parents bought him the plastic, orange-tipped cap gun at Frontier Town, a western-themed adventure centre. Following the interrogation, the boy told his mother that he had brought it to school because he had “really, really” wanted to show his friend, who had previously brought a water pistol to school.
The school’s principal told the mother that her son had pointed the toy at other students and pretended to shoot them, although the boy and his sister, who was also on the bus and subsequently questioned, say this is not the case.
The principal even stated that had the gun been “loaded” with caps, then it would have been “deemed an explosive and police would have been called in.”
The boy, who remains anonymous has been suspended from school for 10 days. “If the punishment stands, it would become part of the boy’s permanent school record and keep him out of classes the rest of the school year,” the report notes.
“The school was quite obviously taking it very seriously, and he’s 5 years old,” the boy’s mother said. “Why were we not immediately contacted?”
“I have no problem that he had a consequence to his behavior,” the mother added. “What I have a problem with is the severity.”
The family has hired attorney Robin Ficker, who was also the attorney involved in the infamous Hello Kitty bubble gun incident back in January, when school officials in Pennsylvania suspended a five-year-old girl for “threatening” class mates with the toy that contains a harmless soap solution. Officials were also said to have interrogated the girl for several hours, before notifying her parents.
Officials at the Mount Carmel school issued a statement describing the girl’s actions as “terroristic” and then refused to retract it following media coverage.
“Kids play cowboys and Indians,” Ficker stated with regards to the latest incident. He added that the boy’s age is important. “They play cops and robbers. You’re talking about a little 5-year-old here.”
He’s “all bugs and frogs and cowboys,” the boy’s mother added.
School officials said they cannot comment on the matter but have scheduled a “disciplinary conference” today to resolve it.
This latest knee-jerk overreaction to children playing with anything that even remotely resembles a gun comes just days after another kindergartner was punished by school officials and forced to apologise for bringing a tiny miniature lego gun onto a school bus.
The list of previous incidents of this nature is now so long that it has prompted Maryland Sen. J. B. Jennings to introduce a bill to stop such idiotic over reactions being played out over and over again in schools.
In March, a 7-year-old boy from Maryland was suspended for unintentionally biting his pop tart into the shape of a gun.
A third grader in Michigan was reprimanded by school officials when he brought a cupcake to school with a plastic toy soldier, holding a gun, on top of it.
A ten year old Virginia boy who was arrested for taking a plastic toy gun to school was forced to deal with a potentially permanent criminal record over the incident.
A student in Florence, Arizona was recently suspended because he had a picture of a gun on his computer.
A six-year-old kindergartner in South Carolina was suspended for taking a small transparent plastic toy gun to school for a show and tell.
A five-year-old in Massachusetts who faced suspension for building a small toy gun out of lego bricks and play-shooting his classmates.
We also reported on an incident that erupted when a discussion between two children about a toy nerf gun caused a lockdown and a massive armed police response at two elementary schools in the Bronx.
In another incident, a Long Island high school was also placed on lock down for 6 hours in response to a student carrying a toy nerf gun.
The nerf gun was once again the deadly weapon of choice as a university campus in Rhode Island was placed on lockdown, causing panic and minor injuries when a stampede to flee the building ensued.
In another incident, a teacher at Malden High School in Massachusetts who glimpsed sight of a “gun”, alerted police who rushed to the scene only to discover a neon water pistol. School officials then vowed to track down the suspect who brought the toy to school using surveillance cameras.
A South Philadelphia elementary student was searched in front of classmates and threatened with arrest after she mistakenly brought a “paper gun” to school.
A 6-year-old boy was suspended from his elementary school, also in Maryland, for making a gun gesture with his hand and saying “pow”.
Another two 6-year-olds in Maryland were suspended for pointing their fingers into gun shapes while playing “cops and robbers” with each other.
A couple of second grade students at a Virginia elementary school were recently suspended for two days after violating the school’s “zero tolerance” policy on weapons when they pointed pencils at other students and made gun noises.
In Oklahoma, a five-year-old boy was also recently suspended for making a gun gesture with his hand.
A 13-year-old Middle School seventh grade student in Pennsylvania was also suspended for the same hand gesture.
The terrorists really are everywhere these days.
—————————————————————-
Steve Watson is the London based writer and editor for Alex Jones’ Infowars.com, and Prisonplanet.com. He has a Masters Degree in International Relations from the School of Politics at The University of Nottingham, and a Bachelor Of Arts Degree in Literature and Creative Writing from Nottingham Trent University.
This article was posted: Friday, May 31, 2013 at 10:58 am




BEST AMERICAN AD SLOGAN: HOW TO RUN THE COUNTRY INTO THE GROUND - EVIL BASTARDS INCORPORATED - WE DO THE JOB RIGHT 

URGENT: June “Gay Month” and destruction --- God's Final Warning to America

URGENT: June “Gay Month” and destruction

                         Verse of the Day

Ezekiel 33:11 Say unto them, As I live, saith the Lord GOD, I have no pleasure in the death of the wicked; but that the wicked turn from his way and live: turn ye, turn ye from your evil ways; for why will ye die, O house of Israel?

God's Final Warning to America

Jude 1:7 Even as Sodom and Gomorrha, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh,are set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire.
2 Peter 2:6 And turning the cities of Sodom and Gomorrha into ashes condemned them with an overthrow, making them an ensample unto those that after should live ungodly;
Massive Tornado Destruction: New Normal for America?
Massive Tornado Destruction: "New Normal" for America?
Powerful tornadoes are now pounding Oklahoma City and the surrounding areas and up to St. Louis. These massive tornadoes are doing incredible damage. There were tornadoes inside Oklahoma City. This is just 10 days after the powerful storm that destroyed 30 square miles of Oklahoma including parts of the city. That was reported as the worst tornado storm in US history.
"A massive tornado touched down Friday, west of Oklahoma City, causing damage and trapping motorists, before heading toward Oklahoma City.The National Weather Service issued a tornado emergency for the Oklahoma City metropolitan area. Weather service forecaster Daryl Williams said the emergency included Oklahoma City and some suburbs."
I reported the May 21 destruction on the blog and linked it to a a three-day homosexual festival taking place in the city. The event called the "New Normal" ended with a parade through downtown Oklahoma City. The massive storm hit the next day.
Many people responded to my linking this massive tornado storm to the homosexual event. Most of these people refused to believe that God will judge open rebellion like this. Many of the people tried to justify that Oklahoma was not as wicked as San Fransisco, and why not judge that city! These people actually compared Oklahoma to California! Oklahoma has open homosexuality, abortion centers and a tremendous divorce rate amongst believers for starters. Added to all this is little, if any intercession, by the churches.
When the Holy God of Israel moves to judge homosexuals and their supporters, the nation also will be destroyed. Judgment like this means that the entire nation was corrupted by the homosexual agenda. I believe that America is very, very close to this right now.
Could these massive storms be God's attempt to wake His church before He totally destroys America? I received many emails from people living in Oklahoma saying their pastor and no one in the church knew of the homosexual event. Why did the pastors of Oklahoma not know this event was taking place in their state capital? Even if they knew, would they have led their church into repentance and intercession before the Lord? I doubt it as few walk in the fear of the Lord.
It appears little if any intercession before the Lord or crying out for mercy was taking place during this event. Oklahoma was left defenseless for judgment. I believe the  vast amount of believers in Oklahoma are just like the ones all over the country: they do not believe that God would judge their area for this organized rebellion against Him.
June 1, starts "Gay Month" as declared by Obama. There are hundreds of events this month and continuing into September celebrating sodomy. Last June during this event, massive fires broke out in the West, along with record drought and crop destruction. The country was burning up during the last "Gay Month."
Why are there not massive repentance rallies taking place this month because of this sin in our streets? WHERE ARE THE PASTORS? I am weary of asking were are the pastors. What does God have to do to awaken His church in America! If He was to destroy the nation in June, I do not think the majority of Christians would make the connection.
Isaiah 1:3 The ox knoweth his owner, and the donkey his master's crib: but Israel doth not know, my people doth not consider.
It is very possible that America faces awesome judgment in June. The last day of May ended with a massive tornado outbreak and the stock market crashing. It is very possible that massive destruction is going to hit America just like it did last "Gay Month."
I have intercessory pray every Thursday on Blog Talk Radio. Everyone is welcome to join. If you cannot find a group for intercessor prayer, this is a place to join in prayer.
These massive tornado storms came out from no place and surprised the meteorologists. As of May 10, this was a record year for fewest tornadoes.
Tornado activity hits 60-year low 05/10/13 Just 11 days later were the record-breaking tornadoes, followed by additional massive storms! This is how fast God can bring the judgment.
"Just two years after a ferocious series of tornado outbreaks killed hundreds of Americans, the USA so far this year is enjoying one of the calmest years on record for twisters. Through Thursday, tornadoes have killed only three Americans in 2013; by the end of May 2011, 543 Americans had died."
God is trying to awaken His church. He does not want to destroy America but to send an outpouring of His Holy Spirit. But, His church, for the overwhelming numbers, does not believe God will judge America, and therefore is not interceding before Him. America is now left spiritually defenseless and naked before the Lord in judgment. It is not that judgment is future, but that has been happening for decades and happening right now before our eyes.
With the rapid advancement of the homosexual agenda, and the church in full retreat without any real spiritual resistance, there cannot be many days left for America.
Why is not June a month of national repentance for the open sin of America, capped off with murdering 60 million babies in the womb, and homosexuals often defiling our cities with their lewd and vulgar events that offend our Father in heaven?
One other thing. In the emails to me, many complain that my linking the national sin to the disasters drives people away from God. This is what the disasters really do:
Survey: Personal Interest in God Increases When Natural Disasters Strike05/30/13 These disasters show how weak we are and our need to seek God.
"A new study from LifeWay Research reveals that more than half (57 percent) of Americans become more interested in God when a natural disaster occurs.About one-third (31 percent) said their interest in God doesn't increase after such catastrophes, the Nashville-based research organization found, and 12 percent were unsure. The study, which was conducted just days after a powerful EF5 tornado ravaged Moore, Okla., on May 20, also revealed that Americans were divided about how they feel toward God "when suffering occurs that appears unfair."
 Psalm 9:16 The LORD is known by the judgment which he executeth: the wicked is snared in the work of his own hands.
Could these tornado storms heading into "Gay Month" be God's final warning to America? At the level of sin that America is now at, any warning could be the last.
If you attend a church, demand that you pastor call the church into repentance. If he does not, then the blood of judgment is on him.
Revelation 16:7  And I heard another out of the altar say, Even so, Lord God Almighty,true and righteous are thy judgments.



IRAQ UNCOVERS AL-QUAEDA "CHEMICAL WEAPONST PLOT"

IS this letter what Obama and Hillary were trying to get covered up with their operation to kill Bin Laden when they knew he was already dead ????

IRAQ UNCOVERS AL-QUAEDA "CHEMICAL WEAPONST PLOT"

Posted By: IZAKOVIC [Send E-Mail]
Date: Saturday, 1-Jun-2013 11:57:45
 
1 June 2013 Last updated at 15:18 GMT
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-22742201
The authorities in Iraq say they have uncovered an al-Qaeda plot to use chemical weapons, as well as to smuggle them to Europe and North America.
Defence ministry spokesman Mohammed al-Askari said five men had been arrested after military intelligence monitored their activities for three months.
Three workshops for manufacturing the chemical agents, including sarin and mustard gas, were uncovered, he added.
Remote-controlled toy planes were also seized at the workshops.
Mr Askari said they were to have been used to release the chemical agents over the target from a "safe" distance of 1.5km (0.9 miles), reports the BBC's Rami Ruhayem in Baghdad.
All of the arrested men had confessed to the plot, and said they had received instruction from another al-Qaeda offshoot, he added.
As the defence ministry spokesman spoke on Iraqi TV, footage was shown of four men with black hoods on their heads, our correspondent adds. Three of them were wearing bright yellow jumpsuits and a fourth was in a brown jumpsuit.
Their arrests were possible because of co-operation between Iraqi and foreign intelligence services, Mr Askari said.
Chlorine bombs
Al-Qaeda in Iraq is believed the only offshoot of the Islamist militant network to have used chemical weapons.
It detonated a 16 crude chlorine bombs in Iraq between October 2006 and June 2007.
Chlorine inhalation made many hundreds of people sick, but no deaths resulting from exposure to the chemical were recorded, US officials said at the time. Instead, the bomb blasts are believed to have caused the fatalities.
At the time, US officials said al-Qaeda appeared to want to use debilitating agents like chlorine in their bombs to cause casualties beyond those hit by the initial explosion.
US and Iraqi troops subsequently killed or detained many of the militants who were building the chlorine-laced bombs and seized much of their stockpiled chemicals.
A letter written by the late al-Qaeda leader Osama Bin Laden five days before he was killed in a US military raid in Pakistan in 2011 urged members of the group's offshoot in Yemen who he believed were considering using "poison" to be "careful of doing it without enough study of all aspects, including political and media reaction", according to CNN.
---
TURKEY SEIZES SARIN IN HOMES OF ANTI-SYRIA MILITANTS, REPORT SAY
http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=278356
IZAKOVIC
http://www.deepspace4.com



Update From Colonel Potter - Hold Your Fire

Update From Colonel Potter - Hold Your Fire
Posted By: Jordon [Send E-Mail]
Date: Saturday, 1-Jun-2013 10:24:56
.
An update on the Boston Bombing, a review of LTG Boykin's video, and a call to restraint.

http://youtu.be/pHQ2-MwrE2c

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Marxism in America by Lt. Gen. (Ret.) W.G. Boykin
Lt. Gen. William Boykin a Green Beret, Original member of Delta Force,was an instructor at Special Warfare Center, worked with CIA, and was Deputiy Undersecretary of Defense of Intelligence.
Boykin speaks frankly about his objections to the government's turning America into a Marxist state, and his anger at the comments of Homeland Security Administration's warning that ministers and returning vets are a threat to America.
Please SHARE, people often think this is just stuff made up by people on the internet. There are plenty of credible people who have warned us, and Gen. Boykin is as credible as can be.
http://youtu.be/LD2gN6khZSw
http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=278480

CGI's Dave404: Brisbane woman has had more than $150,000 taken from bank account under recent law changes

CGI's Dave404: Brisbane woman has had more than $150,000 taken from bank account under recent law changes
Posted By: Susoni [Send E-Mail]
Date: Saturday, 1-Jun-2013 07:27:18
Brisbane woman has had more than $150,000 taken from bank account under recent law changes
“A BRISBANE woman has had more than $150,000 taken from her bank account by the Federal Government in the latest example of savers suffering under recent legislative changes.
Financial planner and accountant Margaret Franklin was "shocked and angry beyond belief" when she found $157,644 had been handed to the Australian Securities and Investments Commission due to new legislation which defines the period of inactivity before money is considered "unclaimed" as three years.

ASIC holds the money before passing it to the Commonwealth of Australia Consolidated Revenue Fund.
The owner can claim their cash at any time, but the process can take as long as six weeks.
The Courier-Mail last week reported that a pensioner had survived major heart surgery, only to find more than $22,000 had been shifted to ASIC by his bank, Suncorp, which later paid back the cash out of its own coffers.
Ms Franklin claims to have received one letter from Adelaide Bank warning her of the changes, but says she was out of the office studying.
By the time she was able to act, the money had vanished.
The 47-year-old mother of two called on the Government to scrap the law, adding her finances were "none of the Government's business".
"It's my opinion that I can transact as often or as infrequently as I like, because after all it's my money," she said.
"I only changed the address on that account last year when we moved offices - so why isn't that noted as something that's important enough to say, well actually this account isn't inactive?"
Opposition Leader Tony Abbott has indicated a Coalition government would amend the law, but Ms Franklin believes that would not be soon enough.
"They can't wait that long - how many people's bank accounts are going to be emptied between now and then?," she asked.”
"This can't wait for Tony."
Read more: http://www.news.com.au/national-news/queensland/brisbane-woman-has-had-more-than-150000-taken-from-bank-account-under-recent-law-changes/story-fnii5v6w-1226654782499#ixzz2UvuhEpaz
Dave404.
http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=278467


Condolences & Agreed, It's In-Your-Face HAARP Treachery

Condolences & Agreed, It's In-Your-Face HAARP Treachery

Posted By: Infoeditor [Send E-Mail]
Date: Saturday, 1-Jun-2013 02:57:11
 
Condolences & Agreed, It's In-Your-Face HAARP Treachery
Sincere condolences on your house damage, but be glad if you folks are now safe and sound.
Yes, the HAARP activity which is also listed at:
HAARP correlation with todays Oklahoma City tornados
http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=278434

is really 'in-your-face' treachery. We've seen similar walls of front clouds go by and misty little spirals which start dipping out of them along the line of clouds - real spooky.
They're really on the ropes for now, and can you believe they keep sticking the same cover up people in various positions to dump files, etc.? I'm surprised they didn't find another place for Special Prosecutor (non-prosecutor) Patrick Fitzgerald somewhere, especially after they appointed 'Fall Guy Kerry' behind Clinton.
They didn't get their gun-control so easily, either. Wonder what kind of mayhem will result if and when Ohbombya signs the UN bill. Ugh!
Thanks for writing in and take care.
Infoeditor
Posted in response
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

: Re: DEATH STALKS OKLA-TX, TORNADOES KILL 5 & H....
: HAARP was cranked up to MAX again today same as the storms
: last week. I live in Okla and and my house got hit last
: week along with a lot of my friends.

: http://www.theweatherspace.com/haarpstatus-north-america/
: We are the enemy of our foreign govt in DC. All of their
: false-flags have been blowing up in the faces,Boston,Sandy
: Hook,Batman,etc.

: Posted in response
: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++=

http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=278457


NEW REPORT REVEALS EXTENT OF CIA'S SECRET FLIGHTS

NEW REPORT REVEALS EXTENT OF CIA'S SECRET FLIGHTS
Posted By: IZAKOVIC [Send E-Mail]
Date: Friday, 31-May-2013 14:47:58
Wednesday, May 29, 2013 9:01 PM
http://en.alalam.ir/news/1479223
A team of academics have launched the world’s largest interactive database detailing suspected CIA rendition flights, many of which may have transported detainees to Guantanamo Bay.
The Rendition Project is a product of a collaborative research between Dr. Ruth Blakely from the University of Kent and Dr. Sam Raphael from Kingston University, London.
Now anyone with an internet connection can understand, view, and track over 11,000 CIA flights detainees may have been aboard between 2001 and 2006 under the US rendition program, a murky operation of secret detention and torture.
“Our purpose is to shed as much light as possible on this system,” Blakely was quoted by Russia Today.
Blakely’s team has compiled a unique database sourced from freedom of information requests, testimonies from detainees, Red Cross reports, courtroom evidence, flight records, and invoices.
The data is categorized into four subcategories- flights which definitely had a detainee on board, those which are suspected of having suspected terrorists on board, and ‘dummy’ or test flights, and other circuit flights, all on 122 different US-registered civilian aircraft.
Most information was already in the public domain, but Blakely hopes by making it web-accessible, the project will assist human rights investigators and lawyers to defend the rights of detainees who have been victims to unfair torture or questionable tactics.
The site will help reveal “how the CIA managed to hide individuals in this system as it transported them around the world to hold them in prisons where they could be tortured and interrogated,” said Blakely.
Scotland is the only country so far which has raised any questions on the alleged rendition activity on home soil.
The CIA’s black sites in over 54 countries have been allegedly used to detain and torture suspected terrorists, and to hold them in custody before being transported to the prison at Guantanamo Bay and other torture and detention centers worldwide.
The EU parliament has previously called upon Poland, Lithuania, and Romania to reveal any ‘black sites’, or airports used to aid the CIA’s secret rendition program.
---
IZAKOVIC
http://www.deepspace4.com



California bill just passed! $50 fee every time you buy ammo!!

California bill just passed! $50 fee every time you buy ammo!!
Posted By: Susoni [Send E-Mail]
Date: Friday, 31-May-2013 13:46:55
 
This is how they did it in OZ... Tax, Tax, Fee, Fee..
Confiscation..
****************************************************************
News vid on link:
http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-guns-boy-scouts-20130530,0,3573485.story

California lawmakers OK a dozen gun-control measures
SACRAMENTO — California lawmakers Wednesday advanced a dozen gun-control measures, including background checks for ammunition buyers, and gave early approval to a tax penalty on the Boy Scouts for barring openly gay leaders.
Legislators also voted for a new $75 charge on real estate transactions to pay for affordable-housing projects.
Mass shootings such as the one in Newtown, Conn., in December spurred Democratic lawmakers to look for ways to tighten California's gun laws, already some of the toughest in the nation.
"We all can recite the horrific acts that have occurred in our country over the last year," said Senate President Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg (D-Sacramento). "These bills attempt to respond to those well-publicized tragedies and many more that go unpublicized."
Californians who want to buy ammunition would have to submit personal information and a $50 fee for a background check by the state, under a bill passed by the Senate. The state Department of Justice would determine whether buyers have a criminal record, severe mental illness or a restraining order that would disqualify them from owning guns.
Ammo shops would check the name on buyers' driver's licenses against a state list of qualified purchasers.
The goal of the bill is "to ensure that criminals and other dangerous individuals cannot purchase ammunition in the state of California," said Sen. Kevin De Leon (D-Los Angeles), author of SB 53.
The vote was 22-14, with a few Democrats joining the Republican minority in opposition.
Sen. Jim Nielsen (R-Gerber) said, "We are criminalizing legal, historic behavior in the state of California and putting onerous burdens and regulations and requirements on law-abiding citizens."
The Senate also OK'd a bill that would outlaw the sale, purchase and manufacture in California of semiautomatic rifles that can accommodate detachable magazines. The measure, SB 374 by Steinberg, also would require those who own such weapons to register them with the state.
The Assembly joined the action on guns by passing a measure to require the state Department of Justice to notify local law enforcement agencies when someone buys more than 3,000 rounds of ammunition. The bill would also ban kits that convert magazines to carry more than 10 rounds and would extend a ban on gun ownership for anyone who conveys a serious threat of violence to a licensed psychotherapist.
Assemblywoman Nancy Skinner (D-Berkeley), who authored the bill, AB 48, said mass shooters often "have a mental health history."
The legislation approved in the Assembly on Wednesday now goes to the Senate and vice versa.
Senators on Wednesday voted to strip tax-exempt status from nonprofit groups, including the Boy Scouts of America, that deny participation based on sexual orientation or religion.
Sen. Ricardo Lara (D-Bell Gardens) said he was glad the Boy Scouts' national council recently decided to allow openly gay minors to serve as scouts. But he said it was unacceptable that the organization did not also lift its ban on gays serving as adult leaders.
Sen. Joel Anderson (R-San Diego) voted against it, saying the bill would hurt the working-class people it is intended to help.
Other bills approved in one house Wednesday would:
http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=278390


Georgia Guidestones

Georgia Guidestones
Posted By: CrystalRiver
Date: Friday, 31-May-2013 08:45:01

 
Georgia Guidestones
The Conspiracy That Inspired The Emmy-Award Winning Series
By Kara Dueck
The Guidestones Team
5-31-13

Erected in Elbert County, Georgia March 22, 1980, this enigmatic granite monument (sometimes referred to as the American Stonehenge) was instantly the centre of numerous conspiracy theories. Who built it? Why? And what do the guides on the stones actually mean? The Canadian Emmy-award winning series, Guidestones, explores the conspiracy surrounding the monument.
There are ten lofty commandments inscribed on the stones in eight different languages. The first reads "Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature". This is interpreted as evidence of an impending apocalypse orchestrated by such secret societies as the Freemasons, the Illuminati, the Bilderburg Group, the Rosicrucians, or some other elitist organization. As such the Georgia Guidestones are frequently considered to be a sinister warning and should be regarded with suspicion and fear.
After reading Randall Sullivan's article in Wired Magazine in 2009, Guidestones creator and director, Jay Ferguson, was determined to make the stone monument the centre of his next project. With a small dedicated team, what he created became an international sensation, exploring the frontier of interactive digital media in a never before seen format.
The series follows an international journalism student, Sandy Rai, who quickly becomes caught in a global conspiracy while investigating an unsolved murder. The story adheres to the popular conspiracy theory and attributes the Georgia Guidestones to the Rosicrucians, an order similar to the Freemasons. The inscription "R.C. Christian" on the nearby instruction tablet indicates that this mysterious figure is the author of the Guidestones, but also admits, in subsequent parentheses, that this name is a pseudonym. As such many have assumed that it refers to Christian Rosenkreuz, the supposed founder of the Order of Rosicrucian, a secret society, which first appeared in Protestant Germany in the early 17th century.
In modern times, several organizations, both religious and non-religious, identify themselves as Rosicrucian. Sandy's search leads her to the Ancient Mystical Order of Rosae Crucis (AMORC), a self-purported non-sectarian organization founded in 1915, which is dedicated to the teaching of philosophical and mystical principles in order to achieve a higher knowledge. They claim their roots reach back to Ancient Egypt and are the only true Rosicrucian Order (although they profess not to judge others who use the name). Other organizations speak of a true and invisible Rosicrucian Order to which all orders have a spiritual connection. This is the stuff of which great conspiracies and, as Guidestones proves, great stories are made.
Traveling around the world, Sandy uncovers a nefarious corporation, which has been developing next gen technology capable of triggering controlled natural disasters and culling the global population. In the wake of this destruction and chaos they will form a New World Order. Throughout Sandy's investigation, she is met with challenges and mysteries she never expected including her own shocking connection to the conspiracy.
Whoever the builders were and whatever their intentions, imagination has certainly filled the gaps where facts have been found wanting.
Discovered at this link: http://rense.com/general96/georgia-guidestones.html
----------------------
Many Blessings,
CrystalRiver

http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=278369