INS Hawaii
Arrival Records Missing for Critical Week in 1961
INS
DOCUMENT FOUND: U.S. CERTIFICATE ISSUED TO ONE EAST AFRICAN-BORN CHILD OF U.S.
CITIZEN IN 1961
“The
only certificate of acquired citizenry issued based on the grounds of birth to
a U.S. citizen abroad was coincidentally also issued in the same time frame
during which Barack Obama’s alleged birth date occurred on August 4th, 1961…
Dunham’s
passport information was known to have existed from the 1960s, but was said by
State Department officials to have been conveniently discarded as a part of an
administrative order to make more file storage space in the 1980s…
Divorce
decree documents for Dunham and Obama Sr. revealed that a conspicuously missing
page from the section of the court proceedings declaring the custody of Obama
Jr. is the same page which corresponds to other divorce records where a birth
certificate would be required by a judge in order to determine original
parentage at birth for a custody ruling based on HRS 571.”
By Dan Crosby
of THE DAILY PEN
of THE DAILY PEN
IMPLICATIVE DISCOVERY: A government document found buried
in the online reference section of a Boston Public Library archive
bolsters a growing mountain of evidentiary data against Barack
Obama’s constitutional eligibility to be president. The document indicates
that a consular officer issued a single certificate of statutory citizenship,
within the time frame including August 4, 1961, to a child born to a U.S. citizen
between July 1st and December 31st, 1961 in the Kenyan region of Africa.
The record also reveals that the certificate was the only one issued for this
specific type of arrival in the U.S. over a span of more than 18 months, among
thousands from other parts of the world.
*****************
A recently
discovered rare immigration record found by researchers working on behalf of an
ongoing investigation into the Constitutional eligibility of Barack Obama to hold the office of the
U.S. presidency reveals that an American consular officer issued a
single Certificate of Citizenship to only one passenger arriving in the U.S.
from the Kenyan region of Africa
between July and December of 1961.
The record shows
demographic and status classifications for a passenger who was explicitly
recorded at the INS Arrival Inspection Station as an individual being born
to a U.S. citizen
parent arriving from the Kenyan region of Africa between July 1st and December
31st, 1961.
This information
and the dates of its documentation are disturbing given the rare nature of the
issuance of certificates of citizenship for children who acquire their
citizenship by birth to incoming U.S. citizens in this particular region of
Africa.
Read
about “Acquired Citizenship”: http://www.kterry.com/citizenship/certofcitizenship.htm#acquired
These dates not
only align with the alleged date of Obama’s birth on August 4, 1961, but also
with evidence indicating that Ann Dunham departed from Hawaii
beginning in February, 1961, shortly after her undocumented marriage to Obama
Sr.
The table below shows there were a total of 13 children of U.S. citizens who
entered the U.S. from Africa’s Kenyan region. It also shows there were 11 from
the United Kingdom in the same time in comparison, to demonstrate the
consistency of this class of arrivals, regardless of the country of
embarkation.
These children
were classified by the INS upon arrival based on a passport which already named
them when they departed from the U.S. prior, or they received requisite
documentation, pre-approved by the U.S. before embarkation, which identified
them specifically as children of U.S. citizens who were up to 18 years old.
However, a child
who enters the U.S. who was not named on a passport prior to the use of that
passport to depart the U.S. must undergo another form of identification process
upon returning. A child who did not exist when the parent departed the U.S., in
the absence of a passport, must be classified as one of three definitions, a
non-resident alien, a derived citizen by parentage or marriage, or a child with
acquired citizenship by birth or legal adoption by a U.S. citizen. The
following table shows the quantity of children who were granted acquired
citizenship from Africa.
Also supporting
this data is the implication of an African trip by the absence of Dunham’s
passport information which is known to have existed from the 1960s, but which
was said by State Department officials to have been conveniently discarded as a
part of an administrative order to make more file storage space in the 1980s.
We know Dunham
used a passport at that time on at least one occasion for her departure with
Obama Jr. to Indonesia where the two lived with Lolo Soetoro, Dunham’s second husband. If Dunham
had filed for a “renewal” of an old passport, rather than for a new passport in
the mid 1960’s for the Indonesian trip, which would have been the common
practice for the life of a passport, this would have been indicated on the
missing application which would have been included with the series of documents
released by an FOIA request in
early 2010.
The
Immigration and Naturalization Service published its annual Report of the
Immigration and Naturalization Service in 1963, for the year of July 1st, 1961
ending on June 30th, 1962. According to information on page 99 of the report the
only certificate of acquired citizenry issued based on the grounds of birth to
a U.S. citizen abroad was coincidentally also issued in the same time frame
during which Barack Obama’s alleged birth date occurred on August 4th, 1961.
Successive
yearly reports add COC recipients to their roster for previous years as
applicants receive those certificates for the year they were born. Table 48
appears to show the data of the acquisition of citizenship by birth, not the
year the COC is delivered. Review of later annual reports shows that each
year’s COC by birth quantities increase as applicants born in those years
receive the COC, regardless of the year of reception. However, in almost all
cases, the COC is delivered for the child within a year of the birth date. COC
delivery is often delayed while the circumstances of the birth abroad are
confirmed for older births who might apply for retroactive COC. However, when
a newborn child enters the U.S. bearing a foreign birth registration from an
official medical facility or institution identifying the citizen parent, a COC
is expedited based on the registration form, the parent(s) testimony and
inspection of the child by the INS. In those cases, a COC may be delivered
in days, not months or years.
According to the
INS, Certificates of Citizenship are issued upon arrival in the U.S. to those
who have acquired statutory citizenship (not natural-born citizenship) by birth
to at least one U.S. citizen parent within the previous year while that
parent(s) was temporarily in another country.
COC are
notifications provided by the American Consulate Service, via the
INS, to individuals born to at least one U.S. citizen abroad in order to
provide interim citizen alien status while immigration status is processed and
secured. COC are not issued to natural-born citizens or children born to
non-U.S. citizen parents arriving in the U.S., nor are COC received through the
same process as required for naturalized citizenship, according to the INS.
A COAC is issued
to an arriving child from abroad who is:
- born abroad to
one U.S. citizen parent and one parent with “alien” non-citizen status, or
- born in the U.S. to two alien parents who both naturalize after the child’s birth, or
- born abroad to a U.S. citizen who did not live in (or come to) the United States for a period of time prior to the child’s birth, or
- adopted and is permanently residing in the United States and can become a U.S. citizen by action of law on the date on which all of the following requirements have been met:
- The child was lawfully admitted for permanent residence; and
- Either parent was a United States citizen by birth or naturalization; and
- The child was still under 18 years of age; and
- The child was not married; and
- The child was the parent’s legitimate child or was legitimated by the parent before the child’s 16th birthday (Stepchildren or children born out of wedlock who were not legitimated before their 16th birthday do not derive United States citizenship through their parents.); and
- If adopted, the child met the requirements of section 101(b)(1)(E) or (F) and has had a full and final adoption; and
- The child was residing in the United States in the legal custody of the U.S. citizen parent (this includes joint custody).
- born in the U.S. to two alien parents who both naturalize after the child’s birth, or
- born abroad to a U.S. citizen who did not live in (or come to) the United States for a period of time prior to the child’s birth, or
- adopted and is permanently residing in the United States and can become a U.S. citizen by action of law on the date on which all of the following requirements have been met:
- The child was lawfully admitted for permanent residence; and
- Either parent was a United States citizen by birth or naturalization; and
- The child was still under 18 years of age; and
- The child was not married; and
- The child was the parent’s legitimate child or was legitimated by the parent before the child’s 16th birthday (Stepchildren or children born out of wedlock who were not legitimated before their 16th birthday do not derive United States citizenship through their parents.); and
- If adopted, the child met the requirements of section 101(b)(1)(E) or (F) and has had a full and final adoption; and
- The child was residing in the United States in the legal custody of the U.S. citizen parent (this includes joint custody).
There is yet
other historical documented evidence supporting the plausibility that Ann Dunham possessed a birth registration for Obama Jr.
from Kenya. In 2009, divorce decree documents for Dunham and Obama Sr. revealed
that a conspicuously missing page from the section
of the court proceedings declaring the custody of Obama Jr. is the same page
which corresponds to other divorce records where a birth certificate would be
required by a judge in order to determine original parentage at birth for a
custody ruling based on HRS 571.
As previously
reported by Dr. Jerome Corsi of WND and other sources, the void of documented
and testimonial evidence accounting for Ann Dunham’s presence in Hawaii between
February and early August of 1961 implies that she had reasons to travel to
Kenya shortly after her undocumented marriage to Obama’s alleged father in
February of 1961.
According to the widely accepted but highly suspicious uncorroborated account
of events, Dunham would have been at least three months pregnant at the time of
the marriage. It was documented that Obama Sr.’s father, living in Kenya at
the time, denounced the marriage leaving the couple with a reconciliatory
reason to travel there.
Following the
completion of her classes at the University of Hawaii in winter 1961, the only
evidence accounting for Dunham’s presence was months after the alleged
marriage, in late August 1961. A transcript of registration to attend
fall extension classes at the University of Washington, in Seattle, beginning
in late August, 1961 was discovered in 2009.
The previous
year’s INS report shows that no other Certificates of Derived Citizenry by
birth were issued to anyone arriving from the Kenyan region of Africa between
July 1st, 1960 and June 30th, 1961. During this time, the INS recorded 282
alien arrivals from Kenya by air, and three U.S. citizens.
The arrival of
these Kenyan aliens is corroborated by the African American Students Foundation
Report of Activities 1959-1961 which documents the arrival of the same
number of students in the U.S. on September 7, 1960 from Nairobi, Kenya via the
second sortie of the Airlift America Project, a project initiated in April 1959
by the AASF and Kenyan politician, Tom Mboya, to bring African students from
Nairobi to study in the U.S.
It should noted that the AASF sent more than 800 students to the United States via the Airlift Project from East Africa in the early 1960s. Some of the student are not accounted by the 1961-1962 Immigration report as having departed from Kenya in the third airlift transport in fall of 1961. However, several of these students attended the University of Chicago where it has been widely speculated they had expenses paid for by six separate U.S. families including the family of Tom and Mary Ayers, parents of domestic terrorist and long-time Obama affiliate, Bill Ayers, with whom Obama served on the Annenberg Education Project Fund board for almost 10 years.
Recent testimony from a retired postal worker who delivered mail to the Ayers’ Glen Ellyn, Chicago residence collaborates with AASF report accounts and indicates the Ayers may have a longer history of supporting foreign exchange students than initially suspected. Barack Obama II, was likely one of these foreign students supported by the Ayers in the late 1980s which would explain his engagement to serve with Ayers on the Annenberg Fund board, perhaps as appreciation for the Ayers’ help.
A COC is also considered a primary form of identification by the State of Hawaii in 1961 to prove a foreign born infant’s residency in the U.S. prompting the issuance of a standard Certificate of Live Birth under Hawaii Revised Statute 338-17 which would then allocate the location of the birth to the mother’s residence.
Corroborating data from passenger arrivals of flights entering the U.S. between July 1st, 1961 and June 30th, 1962 indicates this one individual may have been originally classified as an alien upon arrival prior to application for derivative citizenship. The INS report shows there was only one individual who was originally classified by the INS as an alien arriving by air from Kenya. This individual was possibly inspected by INS officers in Hawaii upon arrival at the INS station located within Honolulu International Airport sometime in early August of 1961.
According to the INS report data, a voluntary birth to a U.S. resident in Africa in 1961, away from the quality of care offered at U.S. hospitals was extremely rare with only eight such cases in more than two years. The rarity of this event would leave an easily referenced recording of the birth abroad. Hawaiian law also specifies that documentation used to issue birth certificates by the Hawaiian Health Department includes certificates of citizenship issued by the Immigration and Naturalization Service upon arrival of children born to U.S. citizens abroad.
_____________________________________________________
Thursday,
December 20, 2012
Emergency Motion
Filed: National Archives Caught
Altering
Hawaii Arrival Records For August 7, 1961
SIBLEY PRESENTS
EVIDENCE TO COURT OF CRIMINAL TAMPERING OF RECORDS RELATED TO OBAMA’S
BIRTH AND JUDGE BATES REFUSES TO RULE ON MOTIONS TO HOLD OBAMA IN CONTEMPT
WASHINGTON D.C. - The multifaceted litigation that Montgomery Blair Sibley has initiated in an attempt to get to the truth regarding the birth records of Barack Hussein Obama II has both produced fruit and met judicial stonewalling.
Yesterday, Sibley filed an Emergency Second Motion for Order to Release Privacy Act Protected Records. That motion presented photographic evidence to Judge Bates that someone has tampered with the evidence related to Obama’s putative birth in Hawaii on August 4, 1961. Sibley had subpoena from the National Archives the “Arrival Records” for August 1 through August 10, 1961, of all passengers arriving in Honolulu, Hawaii to see if records existed that Obama and his mother arrived in Hawaii during that time frame. What NARA produced were two microfilm spools of the arrival records for July 28 through August 1, 1961 and August 8 through August 12, 1961. As detailed in the Emergency Motion, the original date on the box of “August 7” has been altered by “white-out” and a new date of “August 1” had been written on the box. Proof of that alteration comes from a photograph of the same box taken nine months earlier which reveals the date was originally “August 7”. Thus, indisputably the box has been tampered with – a criminal offense – to hide the fact that the microfilm for the August 2 through August 7, 1961 arrivals is now missing.
Judge Bates continues to ignore Court Rules and stonewall the resolution of Sibley’s pending Motions for a Contempt against: (i) Obama 1st and Obama 2nd, (ii) Harvard Law School, (iii) the Social Security Administration, (iv) the Selective Service System and (v) the State Department.
Sibley said: “To me, Judge Bates is no Judge John Sirica of the same Court who, in 1973, ordered President Nixon to turn over subpoenaed tapes of White House conversations. As all who remember know, when the Supreme Court upheld Judge Sirica’s order in July 1974, Nixon resigned in the face of impeachment and nineteen officials from the Nixon White House were convicted. It is a sad commentary on the state of our so-called judiciary that even when faced with evidence of criminal behavior related to birth records of Obama, Judge Bates refuses to rule in order to shield Obama from the engine of truth which is a judicial proceeding.”