Thursday, October 24, 2013

It has begun !

 It has begun ! 

GCR has been implemented  Russia and Indonesia announced it Wed, 10/23/13 
10-9-2013 Newshound/Intel Guru Eagle1 we fully expected to see the GCR livetoday on bank screens. We know without question that the GCR has been ...http://theiraqidinar.com/rumors/gcr-has-been-implemented-229965

Info for
World Currency Revaluation
At the precipice of a brave new world • global currency reset, At the precipice of a brave new world • global currency reset in motion • revaluation will include 198 world currencies. http://www. Cnn reports revaluation of world currency - dinar daily discussions, At risk of being attacked, i wanted to let my wonderful friends here on dd know that last night cnn announced the coming of the restructuring of all currencies.. Revaluation | the currency newshound, Posts about revaluation written by the currency newshound - just hopin.
Iraqi dinar revalue news cbi currency change 2013 - youtube, Revalue of the iraqi dinars 10/20/12, revalue of the iraqi dinars 10/21/12, revalue of the iraqi dinars 10/23/12. Currency revaluation 2013 | iraqi dinar exchange rate, Currency revaluation 2013. currency revaluation 2013 | iraqi dinar exchange rate, currency revaluation 2013. currency revaluation 2013 | iraqi dinar exchange rate. Iraqi dinar revaluation and iraq currency (iqd) resources | dinar, Dinar daddy is the #1 source of information on the official iraqi currency, the iraqi dinar. find dinar revaluation, iqd to usd exchange rates, and more..
       A BRAVE NEW WORLD - WE HAVE WON- LET'S MAKE THE VICTORY - A COMPLETE REBOOT , AND BOOT THE BASTARDS INTO THEIR ETERNITY IN HELL
   
OF MAJOR IMPORTANCE  CHINA STEADFAST -- REPUBLIC TO BE RESTORED ----- MAJOR TRANSFER OF WEALTH IN HISORY -- THE NEW HUNDRED DOLLAR BILL SYMBOLIZES THE NES UST TRANSFER TO BASEL III COMPLIANCE - THE POWER OF " WE THE PEOPLE"   !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

v=vPLJnuHZR0w&feature=player_embedded
KEY SCRIPTURAL REFERENCE , AS GUIDES OF CASCADING EVENTS AS WE PAS THROUGH THE IMPOSITION OF THE NWO .
Daniel 7:1-19 -----  Daniel 2:1-49




************************************************************************
Another false flag coming to N.E. area /

Keene NH Pumpkin Fest Snipers Deployed

Monday, October 21, 2013 6:13
(Before It's News)
Keene, New Hampshire is one of my favorite places in the world. Being a native New Hampshire ‘Live Free or Die’ resident, I love Mt. Monadnock and everything about the area. Almost everything. Every year, one of the big events in Keene is the yearly pumpkin festival that has become world famous. This year, it became notable for another reason. The Keene pumpkin festival had four sniper teams deployed on rooftops around the city. Was the Keene police department expecting pumpkin bombs this year or is this just another step of this Nazi-like Orwellian Police State unfolding in America?
https://www.google.com/url?q=http://beforeitsnews.com/opinion-conservative/2013/10/why-did-keene-n-h-pd-put-snipers-on-downtown-roofs-for-pumpkin-fest-2739134.html&sa=U&ei=APtoUoG3A4mfkQeo6IHgAQ&ved=0CAkQFjAB&client=internal-uds-cse&usg=AFQjCNF09qNnMDRfORXZF6FINXIdy51fPA

Wednesday, October 23, 2013

Why Do Americans Continue to Tolerate the Income Tax Hoax?

Why Do Americans Continue to Tolerate the Income Tax Hoax?


How About THIS Assault:

The Government Wants The Jury To Be Told It CANNOT Judge The Law!

“While Congress might be prohibited from controlling people's speech due to the First Amendment, COURTS aren't prohibited from doing it at the government's request.”





ANYONE KNOW PEOPLE AT THE FULLY INFORMED JURY ASSOCIATION (FIJA)?
Give 'em a call.
________________________________________________

Along with all the other unprecedented things being attempted by the feds in their desperate effort to attack CtC through the current assault on my wife Doreen, a new front against the rule of law has been launched. Recognizing the hopelessness of their case if not girded about by corruption and lies, the government's attorneys have asked the judge handling the case to specifically instruct the jury that it CAN'T consider the lawfulness or Constitutionality of the orders Doreen has resisted!

GOVERNMENT'S PROPOSED INSTRUCTION NO. 12
CONTEMPT – DEFENSE

It is not a defense to the crime of contempt that the court order was unlawful or unconstitutional.

Unbelievable! It's one thing that the federal courts have for years operated under a rather grotesque doctrine laid down by the Supreme Court in the 1890s that judges don't have to let defendants inform the jurors of their absolute right and authority to judge the law as well as the facts involved in any case. But now we have an effort to actually tell them that they cannot do so-- a full-scale assault on the principle of the jury. Call the FIJA people. Call the ACLU. Call IJ. Call somebody. These are YOUR rights being stolen.

AND HEY! CALL THE NRA AND THE GOA, TOO!

After all, the notion behind the prosecution in this effort to frighten Americans away from the liberating truth about the tax (since the state is unable to effectively resist that truth when it IS put into practice, but really, REALLY wants to stop that practice at all costs) is that while Congress might be prohibited from controlling people's speech due to the First Amendment, COURTS aren't prohibited from doing it at the government's request.

So, under this doctrine, how secure are your gun rights just because we have a Second Amendment? How secure are ANY rights under this doctrine? It looks like the state is going to burn down the house, here, in its desperate effort to keep its "ignorance-tax" scam alive.

Doreen's jury selection begins on Wednesday, October 30th at 8:45AM EST in the courtroom of Victoria Roberts at the Theodore Levin building in downtown Detroit, with the trial scheduled to follow immediately. I hope everyone reading this is there-- polite, well-dressed and courteous, but attentive and hard-eyed with jealous regard for experiments on their liberties-- to show these thugs that Americans still care about their rights, and aren't going to let them get stolen away in a dark-alley mugging.

Journalists and legal specialists wanting to learn more and get involved can write me at newscritter 'at' losthorizons.com.

Contributions to help defray the extra expenses we are necessarily having to bear right now would be very welcome, too. You can send to Doreen Hendrickson at 232 Oriole Road, Commerce Twp., Michigan 48382.

What are they so afraid of that they will dare try this kind of stuff?



By The Way, I Gotta Say...

I GET CRAZY WHEN I SPEAK TO FOLKS WHO have not familiarized themselves with CtC's revelations about the actual legal limits of the income tax, nor come to understand how significant those revelations are to the American people (and how threatening they are to the rogue state). These will be the same folks who also have not taken in the now ten-years-and-counting government campaign to suppress those revelations (even while the same government-- and more than three dozen state and local governments-- have been acknowledging their accuracy on tens of thousands of occasions during the same period).

Too often an initial properly outraged response to Doreen's case by these folks gives way to a kind of blank, hypnotic mental backstep when it is learned that the government's violence to the law is being done in connection with its tax scheme. It's like a synapse misfires at that point, as though on programmed cue.

"Oh, it's about taxes..." gets muttered, as though that really IS what it's all about, or as though "what it's about" in that sense should make a difference regarding the lawfulness of what's actually being done. The "taxes" connection invokes a kind of beaten-dog conditioning that seems to shrink the correspondent's spirit and bring on a mental fog and an edging away.

I want to propose a little analogy for those folks, if any of them are reading these words, and for the use of everyone else in dealing with these folks. Let's see whether that conditioning can't be successfully overcome.

SUPPOSE THE POLICE HAD SEIZED YOUR CAR on the allegation by an informant that it was used in a drug deal. Imagine that you had gone down to the police station and made a rebutting affidavit declaring under oath that you had NOT engaged in drug-dealing, in the manner provided for such purposes by the local authorities and after your affidavit was checked against the allegation as provided for by law, your car had been returned.

Now imagine that a year or so later, the police (who get to keep the proceeds of these "forfeitures") go to court complaining that they had now decided they had returned your car by mistake. They don't accuse you of perjury. They DO informally opine that your affidavit is false, but decline to say so over anyone's signature.

The police also present nothing more in support of their informal assertion than the same informant's allegation that had brought the matter up in the first place. In lieu of such a REAL basis for their change of heart and renewed claim against you, the police ask the court to order YOU to rescind your affidavit and replace it with one on which YOU must declare under oath that you WERE dealing drugs, that the police are entitled to your car, and that you believe these things are true and correct. The judge in the case summarily does this, without so much as a hearing, later adding on that you may not indicate on the affidavit that you are saying what you are ordered to say on it under duress and by order of the court.

You refuse (of course). Six years later you get charged with criminal contempt of court for not creating the false affidavit.

WOULD YOU SAY THIS CASE IS "JUST ABOUT DRUGS"??!!

To see details of the assault on Doreen, click here. You'll find links to filings in the case at the end of the article.

Want To Stand On The Side Of The Good Guys?

Learn The Liberating Truth About The Tax And Start Upholding The Law





OBAMA'S ANSWER TO THE COMMUNIST MANIFESTO - HIS BIBLE --- Saul Alinsky

Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 3:50 PM
Subject: Fw: OBAMA'S ANSWER TO THE COMMUNIST MANIFESTO - HIS BIBLE
PLEASE NOTE THAT HILLARY CLINTON IS AN APOSTLE OF ALINSKY ALSO:

Sent:Wednesday, October 23, 2013 3:39 PM
Subject: OBAMA'S ANSWER TO THE COMMUNIST MANIFESTO - HIS BIBLE

Rules for Radicals
By Saul Alinsky - 1971
    Hillary Clinton's 1969 Political Science Thesis("There is Only the Fight") refers to an earlier version of Alinsky’s training manual. "In 1946,” she wrote, "Alinsky's first book, Reveille for Radicals, was published."

Background information
"Obama learned his lesson well. I am proud to see that my father's model for organizing is being applied successfully beyond local community organizing to affect the Democratic campaign in 2008. It is a fine tribute to Saul Alinsky as we approach his 100th birthday." --Letter from L. DAVID ALINSKY, son of Neo-Marxist Saul Alinsky
Obama helped fund 'Alinsky Academy': "The Woods Fund, a nonprofit on which Obama served as paid director from 1999 to December 2002, provided startup funding and later capital to the Midwest Academy.... Obama sat on the Woods Fund board alongside William Ayers,founder of the Weather Underground domestic terrorist organization....  'Midwest describes itself as 'one of the nation's oldest and best-known schools for community organizations, citizen organizations and individuals committed to progressive social change.'... Midwest teaches Alinsky tactics of community organizing."
Hillary, Obama and the Cult of Alinsky: "True revolutionaries do not flaunt their radicalism, Alinsky taught. They cut their hair, put on suits and infiltrate the system from within. Alinsky viewed revolution as a slow, patient process. The trick was to penetrate existing institutions such as churches, unions and political parties.... Many leftists view Hillary as a sell-out because she claims to hold moderate views on some issues. However, Hillary is simply following Alinsky’s counsel to do and say whatever it takes to gain power.
      "Obama is also an Alinskyite.... Obama spent years teaching workshops on the Alinsky method. In 1985 he began a four-year stint as a community organizer in Chicago, working for an Alinskyite group called the Developing Communities Project.... Camouflage is key to Alinsky-style organizing. While trying to build coalitions of black churches in Chicago, Obama caught flak for not attending church himself. He became an instant churchgoer." (By Richard Poe, 11-27-07)
Opening page - Dedication


“Lest we forget at least an over-the-shoulder acknowledgment to the very first radical: from all our legends, mythology, and history... the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom — Lucifer.
Prologue
"The Revolutionary force today has two targets, moral as well as material. Its young protagonists are one moment reminiscent of the idealistic early Christians, yet they also urge violence and cry, 'Burn the system down!' They have no illusions about the system, but plenty of illusions about the way to change our world. It is to this point that I have written this book."
1. The Purpose
In this book we are concerned with how to create mass organizations to seize power and give it to the people; to realize the democratic dream of equality, justice, peace.... "Better to die on your feet than to live on your knees.' This means revolution." p.3
"Radicals must be resilient, adaptable to shifting political circumstances, and sensitive enough to the process of action and reaction to avoid being trapped by their own tactics and forced to travel a road not of their choosing." p.6
"A Marxist begins with his prime truth that all evils are caused by the exploitation of the proletariat by the capitalists. From this he logically proceeds to the revolution to end capitalism, then into the third stage of reorganization into a new social order of the dictatorship of the proletariat, and finally the last stage -- the political paradise of communism." p.10
"An organizer working in and for an open society is in an ideological dilemma to begin with, he does not have a fixed truth -- truth to him is relative and changing; everything to him is relative and changing.... To the extent that he is free from the shackles of dogma, he can respond to the realities of the widely different situations...." pp.10-11
Notes on Saul Alinsky and Neo-Marxism:

     Alinsky's tactics were based, not on Stalin's revolutionary violence, but on the Neo-Marxist strategies of  Antonio Gramsci, an Italian Communist. Relying on gradualism, infiltration and the dialectic processrather than a bloody revolution, Gramsci's transformational Marxism was so subtle that few even noticed the deliberate changes.
     Like Alinsky, Mikhail Gorbachevfollowed Gramsci, not Lenin. In fact, Gramsci aroused Stalins's wrath by suggesting that Lenin's revolutionary plan wouldn't work in the West. Instead the primary assault would be on Biblical absolutes and Christian values, which must be crushed as a social force before the new face of Communism could rise and flourish. Malachi Martin gave us a progress report:
"By 1985, the influence of traditional Christian philosophy in the West was weak and negligible.... Gramsci's master strategy was now feasible. Humanly speaking, it was no longer too tall an order to strip large majorities of men and women in the West of those last vestiges that remained to them of Christianity's transcendent God."
2. Of Means and Ends [Forget  moral or ethical considerations]
"The end is what you want, the means is how you get it. Whenever we think about social change, the question of means and ends arises. The man of action views the issue of means and ends in pragmatic and strategic terms. He has no other problem; he thinks only of his actual resources and the possibilities of various choices of action. He asks of ends only whether they are achievable and worth the cost; of means, only whether they will work. ... The real arena is corrupt and bloody." p.24
"The means-and-ends moralists, constantly obsessed with the ethics of the means used by the Have-Nots against the Haves, should search themselves as to their real political position. In fact, they are passive — but real — allies of the Haves…. The most unethical of all means is the non-use of any means... The standards of judgment must be rooted in the whys and wherefores of life as it is lived, the world as it is, not our wished-for fantasy of the world as it should be...." pp.25-26
"The third rule of ethics of means and ends is that in war the end justifies almost any means...." p.29
"The seventh rule... is that generally success or failure is a mighty determinant of ethics...." p.34
"The tenth rule... is you do what you can with what you have and clothe it with moral garments.... It involves sifting the multiple factors which combine in creating the circumstances at any given time... Who, and how many will support the action?... If weapons are needed, then are appropriate d weapons available? Availability of means determines whether you will be underground or above ground; whether you will move quickly or slowly..." p.36

Notes: Apparently, Michelle Obama referred to these words during her Democratic National Convention speech:
"She said, 'Barack stood up that day,' talking about a visit to Chicago neighborhoods, 'and spoke words that have stayed with me ever since. He talked about 'The world as it is' and 'The world as it should be…' And, 'All of us driven by a simple belief that the world as it is just won't do – that we have an obligation to, fight for the world as it should be."
Do you wonder who -- or whose values -- should determine what "the world... should be?"

4. The Education of the Organizer
"To the organizer, imagination... is the dynamism that starts and sustains him in his whole life of action as an organizer. It ignites and feeds the force that drives him to organize for change....
      "The organizer knows that the real action is in the reaction of the opposition. To realistically appraise and anticipate the probable reactions of the enemy, he must be able to identify with them, too, in his imagination, and foresee their reactions to his actions....
     "The organizers searching with a free and open mind
void of certainty, hating dogma, finds laughter not just a way to maintain his sanity but also a key to understanding life."pp.74-75
"...the organizer must be able to split himself into two parts -- one part in the arena of action where he polarizes the issue to 100 to nothing, and helps to lead his forces into conflict, while the other part knows that when the time comes for negotiations that it really is only a 10 percent difference." p.78
"...the organizer is constantly creating new out of the old. He knows that all new ideas arise from conflict; [See Dialectic Process]  that every time man as had a new idea it has been a challenge to the sacred ideas of the past and the present and inevitably a conflict has raged." p.79
5. Communication [Notice the emphasis on conflict, dialogue, relationships, etc. Team "service" is essential to building strong relationships through "common involvements"]

 "And so the guided questioning goes on without anyone losing face or being left out of the decision-making. Every weakness of every proposed tactic is probed by questions.... Is this manipulation? Certainly...." p.88

"One of the factors that changes what you can and can't communicate is relationships. There are sensitive areas that one does not touch until there is a strong personal relationship based on common involvements. Otherwise the other party turns off and literally does not hear....
     "Conversely, if you have a good relationship, he is very receptive.... For example, I have always believed that birth control and abortion are personal rights to be exercised by the individual. If, in my early days when I organized... neighborhood in Chicago, which was 95 per cent Roman Catholic, I had tried to communicate this, even through the experience of the residents, whose economic plight was aggravated by large families, that would have been the end of my relationship with the community. That instant I would have been stamped as an enemy of the church and all communication would have ceased.
     "Some years later, after establishing solid relationships, I was free to talk about anything.... By then the argument was no longer limited to such questions as, 'How much longer do you think the Catholic Church can hang on to this archaic notion and still survive?' ...the subject and nature of the discussion would have been unthinkable without that solid relationship." pp.93-94

6. In the Beginning: The Process of Power [Notice the compromise needed to build the power base. Yet, since pragmatism has eroded all values, it's simply a matter of ends justifying means. It's not unlike churches that attract members through the world's entertainment -- then continue to soften or hide Truth in order to keep them happy and lure more.]

"From the moment the organizer enters a community he lives, dreams... only one thing and that is to build the mass power base of what he calls the army. Until he has developed that mass power base, he confronts no major issues.... Until he has those means and power instruments, his 'tactics' are very different from power tactics. Therefore, every move revolves around one central point: how many recruits will this bring into the organization, whether by means of local organizations, churches, service groups, labor Unions, corner gangs, or as individuals."
     "Change comes from power, and power comes from organization." p.113
"The first step in community organization is community disorganization. The disruption of the present organization is the first step toward community organization. Present arrangements must be disorganized if they are  to be displace by new patterns.... All change means disorganization of the old and organization of the new." p.116
Compare with this excerpts from “Group Decision and Social Change” by Kurt Lewin:
      "A change toward a higher level of group performance is frequently short lived: after a “shot in the arm”, group life soon returns to the previous level. This indicates that it does not suffice to define the objective of a planned change in group performance as the reaching of a different level. Permanency of the new level, or permanency for a desired period, should be included in the objective. A successful change includes therefore three aspects:
  • UNFREEZING (if necessary) the present level... 
  • MOVING to the new level . . . and
  • FREEZING group life on the new level."
"An organizer must stir up dissatisfactionand discontent... He must create a mechanism that can drain off the underlying guilt for having accepted the previous situation for so long a time. Out of this mechanism, a new community organization arises....
     "The job then is getting the people to move, to act, to participate; in short, to develop and harness the necessary power to effectively conflict with the prevailing patterns and change them. When those prominent in the status quo turn and label you an 'agitator' they are completely correct, for that is, in one word, your function—to agitate to the point of conflict." p.117
"Process tells us how. Purpose tells us why. But in reality, it is academic to draw a line between them, they are part of a continuum.... Process is really purpose." p.122
7. Tactics
"Tactics are those conscious deliberate acts by which human beings live with each other and deal with the world around them. ... Here our concern is with the tactic of taking; how the Have-Nots can take power away from the Haves." p.126

Always remember the first rule of power tactics (pps.127-134):
1. "Power is not only what you have, but what the enemy thinks you have."
2. "Never go outside the expertise of your people. When an action or tactic is outside the experience of the people, the result is confusion, fear and retreat.... [and] the collapse of communication.
3. "Whenever possible, go outside the expertise of the enemy. Look for ways to increase insecurity, anxiety and uncertainty. (This happens all the time. Watch how many organizations under attack are blind-sided by seemingly irrelevant arguments that they are then forced to address.)
4. "Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules. You can kill them with this, for they can no more obey their own rules than the Christian church can live up to Christianity."
5. "Ridicule is man's most potent weapon. It is almost impossible to counteract ridicule. Also it infuriates the opposition, which then reacts to your advantage."
6. "A good tactic is one your people enjoy."
7. "A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag. Man can sustain militant interest in any issue for only a limited time...."
8. "Keep the pressure on, with different tactics and actions, and utilize all events of the period for your purpose."
9. "The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself."
10. "The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition. It is this unceasing pressure that results in the reactions from the opposition that are essential for the success of the campaign."
11. "If you push a negative hard and deep enough, it will break through into its counterside... every positive has its negative."
12. "The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative."
13. Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.  In conflict tactics there are certain rules that [should be regarded] as universalities. One is that the opposition must be singled out as the target and 'frozen.'...
     "...any target can always say, 'Why do you center on me when there are others to blame as well?' When your 'freeze the target,' you disregard these [rational but distracting] arguments.... Then, as you zero in and freeze your target and carry out your attack, all the 'others' come out of the woodwork very soon. They become visible by their support of the target...'
     "One acts decisively only in the conviction that all the angels are on one side and all the devils on the other." (pps.127-134)

 Saul Alinksky, Rules for Radicals, Vintage Books, New York, 1989.

Additional Notes:

Alinsky's Rules for Radicals: "Known as the 'father of modern American radicalism,' Saul D. Alinsky (1909-1972) developed strategies and tactics that take the enormous, unfocused emotional energy of grassroots groups and transform it into effective anti-government and anti-corporate activism. ... Some of these rules are ruthless, but they work."
       "Alinsky's second chapter, called Of Means and Ends, craftily poses many difficult moral dilemmas, and his 'tenth rule of the ethics of means and ends' is: 'you do what you can with what you have and clothe it with moral arguments.'  He doesn't ignore traditional moral standards or dismiss them as unnecessary. He is much more devious; he teaches his followers that 'Moral rationalization is indispensable at all times of action whether to justify the selection or the use of ends or means.'...
       "The qualities Alinsky looked for in a good organizer were:
  • ego ("reaching for the highest level for which man can reach — to create, to be a 'great creator,' to play God"),
  • curiosity (raising "questions that agitate, that break through the accepted pattern"),
  • irreverence ("nothing is sacred"; the organizer "detests dogma, defies any finite definition of morality"),
  • imagination ("the fuel for the force that keeps an organizer organizing"),
  • a sense of humor ("the most potent weapons known to mankind are satire and ridicule"), and an
  • organized personality with confidence in presenting the right reason for his actions only "as a moral rationalization after the right end has been achieved.'...
"'The organizer's first job is to create the issues or problems,' and 'organizations must be based on many issues.' The organizer 'must first rub raw the resentments of the people of the community; fan the latent hostilities of many of the people to the point of overt expression. He must search out controversy and issues, rather than avoid them, for unless there is controversy people are not concerned enough to act. . . . An organizer must stir up dissatisfactionand discontent.'"
Home 


IS OBAMA'S DECK STACKED AGAINST US?

IS OBAMA'S DECK STACKED AGAINST US?

By Ron Ewart

October 23, 2013

"The marvel of all history is the patience with which men and women submit to burdens unnecessarily laid upon them by their governments." -George Washington
For several years now, we have tried to convince our audience that it may not be possible to win our freedom and property rights battles within the confines of the law, or through the legislative or judicial branches of government. It would appear that the deck is stacked against us. And certainly we will win nothing by approaching the executive branch, especially the executive branch now occupied by the committed socialist, Barack Hussein Obama.
It is alleged that Alexander Tyler wrote the following statement in 1787: "A democracy is always temporary in nature; it simply cannot exist as a permanent form of government. A democracy will continue to exist up until the time that voters discover that they can vote themselves generous gifts from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates who promise the most benefits from the public treasury, with the result that every democracy will finally collapse due to loose fiscal policy, which is always followed by a dictatorship."
Whether Tyler wrote the statement or not, it still holds true and the statement has manifested itself right in front of our very eyes in America ..... in spades. Ever since President Wilson and the passage of the 16th Amendment in 1913, and maybe even before, Americans have become locked in indentured servitude to an all-powerful central government. How can the people unlock their chains if the deck is so stacked against them that the chains cannot be broken without violence?
There are five forms of redress of grievances by the "people" to government. 1) Petition the legislative branch of government either directly or by votes; 2) Bring court actions to defend and uphold our individual constitutional rights; 3) Engage in massive protests at the foot of government's door; 4) Civil disobedience and defiance of unconstitutional law and finally 5) armed revolution.
If the first two forms of redress have been "closed" to the people, there are only three forms of redress remaining. The third and fourth forms require a huge outpouring from aggrieved and angry Americans. Protests and civil disobedience must be in the tens of thousands, if not the hundreds of thousands. And to be effective, any protests must be brought to the individual legislators and justices at the foot of "their" doors where they live, not at the capitol building, or at the halls of justice. Decision-makers must be made to feel the pain of their decisions where they live. They must suffer, as we are, for confiscating our rights and our property. They must pay a price for violating their oath of office to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution if they cannot be thrown from office, or impeached. They must be held accountable for allowing the bureaucracies they created, like the IRS, the EPA, the DOE and others, to become corrupted and run amok.
And their families should also pay a price for being complicit with the decision-makers. Perhaps the wives and children of the decision-makers, under pressure from peaceful protesters, can convince the decision-makers to behave as not only representatives of, by and for the "people", but guardians of our Constitutions. But if the people do not organize and rise up exponentially in huge numbers, the people have no chance of winning their freedom.
With regard to civil disobedience and outright defiance of unconstitutional law (redress No. 4), John Locke wrote: "Whenever the legislators endeavor to take away and destroy the property of the people, or to reduce them to slavery under arbitrary power, they put themselves into a state of war with the people, who are thereupon absolved from any further obedience and are left to the common refuge which God hath provided for all men against force and violence."
Are the people in a state of war with government? It would seem so now that the door on the jailhouse cell has locked us in and bound us in the chains of Obama Care, enforced by the arrogant, abusive and corrupt IRS.
Unfortunately, recent decisions by legislators and the courts only embolden government and the lobbyists, to continue their actions. Only WE THE PEOPLE can stop them, but will we? If the right of protest and civil disobedience, the third and fourth forms of redress of grievances, produce no results, there is only one form of redress remaining and it is the hardest and harshest of all the five forms, with no guarantee of success. But civil disobedience and defiance of unconstitutional law must be done on a large enough scale or the government will make terrorized victims out of the few that try.
Just recently an author of the Freedom Outpost website wrote this:
"Civil War is upon you, whether you would have it or not. The time has come to realize that words and the election process will not avail to turn the tide that is rushing toward you. The time for idleness has ended. The time for action is upon us. Yes, I am openly calling for Civil War, for the Confederacy and the Red States to secede, peacefully if allowed, by force of arms if not. The time to act was long ago, the window to act is almost closed. Our country is being bankrupted, our morals and religion destroyed by all manner of perversions and horrors, our top military generals and leaders fired, our borders left wide open, deceptive legislation designed to subvert our freedoms and our way of life are being passed with little to no resistance, and our status as (a) superpower almost gone. This is all by design, moves on the chess board."
This author obviously believes that "The Deck is Stacked Against Us" and that the normal forms of redress of grievances are no longer effective. But then it was stacked against George Washington as well. He didn't quit or we would all be speaking King George English.
A while back we watched a two-hour special on George Washington, the Warrior. It presented our first president at first as a bungling British officer at the tender age of 22, with a military career that could have ended in abject failure. We missed the first few minutes and thus didn’t learn how he had obtained the rank of major and then lieutenant Colonel, at such an early age. His almost downfall came during the opening of the French-Indian Wars (circa 1755) in one of the first skirmishes with French Troops and the unnecessary killing of a French Ambassador that caused an international incident. George was learning the hard way, as most of the rest of us must learn, the hard way. To add insult to injury, he set up a fort at the sight of the first battle with the French and ended up losing almost his entire command to the French because of his in-experience. How he managed to either survive the battle or save his military career goes deeper into history than space allows. But survive he did. In fact, in another battle with the French, his British commander was killed and he took over in an absolutely chaotic situation of death and mayhem. He organized the remaining troops and staged a retreat that saved many of his men. Musket balls were flying everywhere and some went through George’s tunic, but he escaped the battle without a scratch. It was clear that George, the man and the officer, was beginning to get his stride.
George retired from the service and became a gentleman farmer at a plantation in Mount Vernon, Virginia that he inherited from his brother, after his brother died. George later married Martha, a wealthy widow with two children. One of those children would die in George’s arms during an epileptic seizure. It was at the Plantation that George learned more critical skills.
(NOTE: Our current batch of legislators and justices could learn a lot, like George did, if they would only spend some time in a business pursuit to teach them the realities of economics, commerce and people, instead of becoming lawyers and spending their time in law offices and courts suing people before they became politicians.)
By 1775, the British were getting a little tired of the colonists resisting their rule and taxes and commenced outright war against them. The skirmish with 600 British soldiers and some American militiamen at Concorde became the "shot heard around the world." The Revolutionary war that ensued is a matter of history, but what may be little known is the enormous part that George Washington played. Single-handed, George held a rag tag army together and with the help of the French (war does make strange bedfellows) bested the British to win our freedom.
Many times George Washington, mounted on his horse, would race out in front of his men, in between them and the advancing British soldiers, to spur his men on and lead them to victory. Time after time he braved musket balls, bayonets and cannon fire. At any moment, during any battle, he could have been killed. Yet he lived to become the first President of the United States.
Washington had to beg the early Congress to give him the materials he needed to prosecute the war. Time after time his begging went unanswered as Congress went into hiding. Washington's biggest problem was resignation and desertion. Dozens of his men went home sick. Still more left because of pleading letters from their wives back home. Some officers quit after Congress refused to promote them. Many of the troops were simply fed up and warn out. There were not enough guns, blankets, or food. Illness was rampant.
Nevertheless, Washington and his men advanced on a British position, many of them in bare feet, at night, in the middle of winter, with deep snow on the ground. They won that battle, in spite of the unbearable hardships. Many wanted to return to their homes after their enlistment expired. George convinced them to stay one more month to win another battle. Many stayed much longer. In a winter camp, as men were dying at the rate of 10 per day, he held them together to fight again.
Without George Washington, America would not exist. So one man can make a difference, even if the deck is stacked against him. Think what great things we could do in America with many men, or women, who were as brave, steadfast and dedicated as George Washington and who strongly believed in freedom enough to drive he and his men into oblivion, if necessary. Who among you?
Subscribe to the NewsWithViews Daily News Alerts!
Enter Your E-Mail Address:

It isn't necessary ..... yet, to ride into battle with guns blazing. So who among you will challenge unconstitutional laws? Who among you will organize protests, local, state, or federal? Who among you will risk fighting the IRS ..... as we are? (review the details of our fight HERE, including our Criminal Complaint filed with the FBI) Who among you will tell a government agent to get off his or her land? Who among you will take their day in court to prove that the law (or laws) they are being forced to follow have no basis in constitutional law. Who among you will say an emphatic NO! to Obama Care? Who among you will get out and support and fund a candidate that espouses the principles of liberty?
Ladies and gentlemen, if Americans don't start saying NO! to government, in no uncertain terms, then Americans will have to get used to the chains around their necks. Millions of Americans are already in the virtual chains of government tyranny, or they are the recipients of government largess and will not bite the hand that "feeds" them. The tragic part is, this is America's reality. It is not fantasy.
Does Obama or the Democrats hold all the cards? Only if the people of conscience let them.
© 2013 Ron Ewart — All Rights Reserved
Share This Article
Click Here For Mass E-mailing
 

Ron Ewart, a nationally known author and speaker on freedom and property issues and author of his weekly column, "In Defense of Rural America", is the President of the National Association of Rural Landowners, (NARLO) a non-profit corporation headquartered in Washington State and dedicated to restoring, maintaining and defending property rights for urban and rural landowners. Mr. Ewart can be reached by e-mail for comment at ron@narlo.org, or by 'phone at 1 800 682-7848.
Website: www.narlo.org

E-Mail: ron@narlo.org