Christian
Brothers and Sisters: Did You Know Our Government Is Supporting
Islamic Terrorists?
Posted
on August 11, 2014
by WashingtonsBlog
by WashingtonsBlog
Christians
are being persecuted by Islamic terrorists in Iraq and Syria.
The
“ISIS” Islamic terrorists have literally CRUCIFIED people in Iraq recently, and
have marked the houses of Christians … presumably for execution.
They
have told Christians in Mosel, “convert to Islam or die“. They have pulled down
crosses at churches in Iraq. Thousands of residents of Iraq’s biggest Christian
town have been forced to flee their homes as the ISIS killers overran their
town and said: “leave, convert or die“.
The ISIS
terrorists are not only beheading adult Christians, but they are systematically
beheading CHILDREN.
In
Syria, rebels fighting against the Syrian government told Christians, “Either
you convert to Islam or you will be beheaded.” Syrian rebels slit the throat of
Christian man who refused to convert to Islam, taunting his fiance by yelling:
“Jesus didn’t come to save him!” And – like the Islamic terrorists in Iraq –
they’ve CRUCIFIED Christians.
A former
Syrian Jihadi says the rebels have a “9/11 ideology”. Indeed, they’re literally
singing Bin Laden’s praises and celebrating the 9/11 attack:
It’s obvious that the Islamic terrorists are threatening Christians. And
they’re threatening Jews as well.
Our
Government Is BACKING Islamic Terrorists
But did
you know that irrefutable proof shows that our government is backing Islamic
terrorists?
ABC News
reports:
The
Sunni rebels [inside Syria] are supported by the Islamist rulers of Saudi
Arabia, Qatar and Turkey, as well as the U.S., France, Britain and others.
So the
U.S. is directly supporting the terrorists … and close U.S. allies Saudi
Arabia, Qatar, Turkey France and Britain are also supporting them.
World
Net Daily reports that the U.S. trained Islamic jihadis – who would later join
ISIS – in Jordan.
Der Spiegel
and the Guardian confirmed that the U.S., France and England trained hundreds
if not thousands of Islamic fighters in Jordan.
The
Jerusalem Post and Breitbart report that an ISIS fighter says that Turkey funds
the terrorist group. Turkey is a member of NATO and – until very recently – a
close U.S. ally.
The
Independent headlines “Iraq crisis: How Saudi Arabia helped Isis take over the
north of the country”:
Some
time before 9/11, Prince Bandar bin Sultan, once the powerful Saudi ambassador
in Washington and head of Saudi intelligence until a few months ago, had a
revealing and ominous conversation with the head of the British Secret
Intelligence Service, MI6, Sir Richard Dearlove. Prince Bandar told him: “The
time is not far off in the Middle East, Richard, when it will be literally ‘God
help the Shia’. More than a billion Sunnis have simply had enough of them.”
***
There is
no doubt about the accuracy of the quote by Prince Bandar, secretary-general of
the Saudi National Security Council from 2005 and head of General Intelligence
between 2012 and 2014, the crucial two years when al-Qa’ida-type jihadis took
over the Sunni-armed opposition in Iraq and Syria. Speaking at the Royal United
Services Institute last week, Dearlove, who headed MI6 from 1999 to 2004,
emphasised the significance of Prince Bandar’s words, saying that they
constituted “a chilling comment that I remember very well indeed”.
He does
not doubt that substantial and sustained funding from private donors in Saudi
Arabia and Qatar, to which the authorities may have turned a blind eye, has
played a central role in the Isis surge into Sunni areas of Iraq. He said:
“Such things simply do not happen spontaneously.” This sounds realistic since
the tribal and communal leadership in Sunni majority provinces is much beholden
to Saudi and Gulf paymasters, and would be unlikely to cooperate with Isis
without their consent.
***
Unfortunately,
Christians in areas captured by Isis are finding this is not true, as their
churches are desecrated and they are forced to flee. A difference between
al-Qa’ida and Isis is that the latter is much better organised; if it does
attack Western targets the results are likely to be devastating.
***
Dearlove
… sees Saudi strategic thinking as being shaped by two deep-seated beliefs or
attitudes. First, they are convinced that there “can be no legitimate or
admissible challenge to the Islamic purity of their Wahhabi credentials as
guardians of Islam’s holiest shrines”. But, perhaps more significantly given
the deepening Sunni-Shia confrontation, the Saudi belief that they possess a
monopoly of Islamic truth leads them to be “deeply attracted towards any
militancy which can effectively challenge Shia-dom”.
Western
governments traditionally play down the connection between Saudi Arabia and its
Wahhabist faith, on the one hand, and jihadism, whether of the variety espoused
by Osama bin Laden and al-Qa’ida or by Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi’s Isis. There is
nothing conspiratorial or secret about these links: 15 out of 19 of the 9/11 hijackers
were Saudis, as was Bin Laden and most of the private donors who funded the
operation.
***
But
there has always been a second theme to Saudi policy towards al-Qa’ida type
jihadis, contradicting Prince Bandar’s approach and seeing jihadis as a mortal threat
to the Kingdom. Dearlove illustrates this attitude by relating how, soon after
9/11, he visited the Saudi capital Riyadh with Tony Blair.
He
remembers the then head of Saudi General Intelligence “literally shouting at me
across his office: ’9/11 is a mere pinprick on the West. In the medium term, it
is nothing more than a series of personal tragedies. What these terrorists want
is to destroy the House of Saud and remake the Middle East.’” In the event,
Saudi Arabia adopted both policies, encouraging the jihadis as a useful tool of
Saudi anti-Shia influence abroad but suppressing them at home as a threat to
the status quo. It is this dual policy that has fallen apart over the last
year.
Saudi
sympathy for anti-Shia “militancy” is identified in leaked US official
documents. The then US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton wrote in December
2009 in a cable released by Wikileaks that “Saudi Arabia remains a critical
financial support base for al-Qa’ida, the Taliban, LeT [Lashkar-e-Taiba in
Pakistan] and other terrorist groups.”
***
Saudi
Arabia and its allies are in practice playing into the hands of Isis which is
swiftly gaining full control of the Sunni opposition in Syria and Iraq.
***
For all
his gargantuan mistakes, Maliki’s failings are not the reason why the Iraqi
state is disintegrating. What destabilised Iraq from 2011 on was the revolt of
the Sunni in Syria and the takeover of that revolt by jihadis, who were often
sponsored by donors in Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Kuwait and United Arab Emirates.
Again and again Iraqi politicians warned that by not seeking to close down the
civil war in Syria, Western leaders were making it inevitable that the conflict
in Iraq would restart. “I guess they just didn’t believe us and were fixated on
getting rid of [President Bashar al-] Assad,” said an Iraqi leader in Baghdad
last week.
Of
course, US and British politicians and diplomats would argue that they were in
no position to bring an end to the Syrian conflict. But this is misleading. By
insisting that peace negotiations must be about the departure of Assad from
power, something that was never going to happen since Assad held most of the
cities in the country and his troops were advancing, the US and Britain made
sure the war would continue.
***
Saudi
Arabia has created a Frankenstein’s monster over which it is rapidly losing
control. The same is true of its allies such as Turkey which has been a vital
back-base for Isis and Jabhat al-Nusra by keeping the 510-mile-long
Turkish-Syrian border open.
Remember,
Al Qaeda wasn’t even in Iraq until the U.S. invaded that country.
The
Daily Beast (a media company formerly owned by Newsweek) notes, in a story
entitled “America’s Allies Are Funding ISIS”:
The
Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS), now threatening Baghdad, was funded for
years by wealthy donors in Kuwait, Qatar, and Saudi Arabia, three U.S. allies
that have dual agendas in the war on terror.
***
The
extremist group that is threatening the existence of the Iraqi state was built
and grown for years with the help of elite donors from American supposed allies
in the Persian Gulf region.
***
A key
component of ISIS’s support came from wealthy individuals in the Arab Gulf
States of Kuwait, Qatar and Saudi Arabia. Sometimes the support came with the tacit
nod of approval from those regimes ….
Gulf
donors support ISIS, the Syrian branch of al Qaeda called the al Nusrah Front,
and other Islamic groups fighting on the ground in Syria ….
Donors
in Kuwait, the Sunni majority Kingdom on Iraq’s border, have taken advantage of
Kuwait’s weak financial rules to channel hundreds of millions of dollars to a
host of Syrian rebel brigades, according to a December 2013 report by The
Brookings Institution, a Washington think tank that receives some funding from
the Qatari government.
***
“The
U.S. Treasury is aware of this activity and has expressed concern about this
flow of private financing. But Western diplomats’ and officials’ general
response has been a collective shrug,” the report states.
When
confronted with the problem, Gulf leaders often justify allowing their Salafi
constituents to fund Syrian extremist groups ….
That’s
what Prince Bandar bin Sultan, head of Saudi intelligence since 2012 and former
Saudi ambassador in Washington, reportedly told Secretary of State John Kerry
when Kerry pressed him on Saudi financing of extremist groups earlier this
year. Saudi Arabia has retaken a leadership role in past months guiding help to
the Syrian armed rebels, displacing Qatar, which was seen as supporting some of
the worst of the worst organizations on the ground.
Business
Insider notes:
The
Islamic State for Iraq and the Levant … is also receiving private donations
from wealthy Sunnis in American-allied Gulf nations such as Kuwait, Qatar, and,
possibly, Saudi Arabia.
***
As far
back as March, Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki has accused Saudi Arabia
and Qatar of openly funding ISIS as his troops were fighting them.
“I
accuse them of inciting and encouraging the terrorist movements. I accuse them
of supporting them politically and in the media, of supporting them with money
and by buying weapons for them,” he told France 24 television.
In
Kuwait, donors have taken advantage of weak terror financing control laws to
funnel hundreds of millions of dollars to various Syrian rebel groups,
including ISIS, according to a December 2013 report by The Brookings
Institution, which receives some funding from the government of Qatar.
“Over
the last two and a half years, Kuwait has emerged as a financing and organizational
hub for charities and individuals supporting Syria’s myriad rebel groups,” the
report said, adding that money from donors in other gulf nations is collected
in Kuwait before traveling through Turkey or Jordan to reach the insurgents.
***
Ironically,
Kuwait is a staging area for individuals funneling money to an ISIS
organization that is aligned with whatever is left of the Baathist regime once
led by Saddam Hussein. In 1990, the U.S. went to war with Iraq over Hussein’s
invasion and occupation of Kuwait.
We noted
last year:
Most of
the Syrian “rebels” are Al Qaeda. The U.S. government has designated these guys
as terrorists. Things are getting worse, not better: Al Qaeda is gaining more
and more power among the rebels. The U.S., Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Israel have
been backing these guys for years. Indeed, we’ve long known that most of the
weapons we’re shipping to Syria are ending up in the hands of Al Qaeda. And
they apparently have chemical weapons.
In fact,
Obama signed a special exemption to the law barring arming of terrorists.
We’re
now shipping heavy weapons to the Islamic extremists such as anti-tank (“TOW”
missiles) and possibly even anti-aircraft weapons
Screenshot
from Youtube video showing Syrian Islamic extremist using a TOW provided by the
U.S.
Most of
those arms have now ended up in the hands of ISIS.
And the
Jihadist credited with being the “military mastermind” of the recent ISIS
victories is named Tarkhan Batirashvili. He’s not Arabic, but rather Chechen.
He doesn’t look like an Arab: he’s fair-skinned, with a long red beard.
Who are
Chechens? Their country – Chechnya – was part of the Soviet Union. After the
USSR broke up, the Chechens launched wars and terrorist attacks to try to gain
independence from Russia.
The Wall
Street Journal reported last year that Batrashvili has made the wars in Syria
and Iraq “into a geopolitical struggle between the US and Russia.”
Sadly,
the U.S. has supported Sunni Islamic terrorists in Chechnya as a way to harass
Russia. (And our backing of such extremists in Chechnya may well have led to
the Boston bombings).
As shown
below, the U.S. has been backing Islamic terrorists as part of its geopolitical
struggle against Russia for many decades.
We
Created Terrorists to Fight the Soviets in Afghanistan
Top American officials admit that the U.S.
armed and supported Bin Laden and the other Mujahadin – which later morphed
into Al Qaeda – in the 1970s, in order to fight the Soviets.
Jimmy
Carter’s National Security Adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski admitted on CNN that the
U.S. organized and supported Bin Laden and the other originators of “Al Qaeda”
in the 1970s to fight the Soviets. Brzezinski told Al Qaeda’s forefathers – the
Mujahadin:
We know of their deep belief
in God – that they’re confident that their struggle will succeed. That land
over – there is yours – and you’ll go back to it some day, because your fight
will prevail, and you’ll have your homes, your mosques, back again, because
your cause is right, and God is on your side.
CIA director and Secretary of Defense Robert Gates confirmed in his memoir that
the U.S. backed the Mujahadin in the 1970s.
Former
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton agrees:
MSNBC reported in 1998:
As his
unclassified CIA biography states, bin Laden left Saudi Arabia to fight the
Soviet army in Afghanistan after Moscow’s invasion in 1979. By 1984, he was
running a front organization known as Maktab al-Khidamar – the MAK – which
funneled money, arms and fighters from the outside world into the Afghan war.
What the
CIA bio conveniently fails to specify (in its unclassified form, at least) is
that the MAK was nurtured by Pakistan’s state security services, the
Inter-Services Intelligence agency, or ISI, the CIA’s primary conduit for
conducting the covert war against Moscow’s occupation.
***
The CIA,
concerned about the factionalism of Afghanistan … found that Arab zealots who
flocked to aid the Afghans were easier to “read” than the rivalry-ridden
natives. While the Arab volunteers might well prove troublesome later, the
agency reasoned, they at least were one-dimensionally anti-Soviet for now. So
bin Laden, along with a small group of Islamic militants from Egypt, Pakistan,
Lebanon, Syria and Palestinian refugee camps all over the Middle East, became
the “reliable” partners of the CIA in its war against Moscow.
***
To this
day, those involved in the decision to give the Afghan rebels access to a
fortune in covert funding and top-level combat weaponry continue to defend that
move in the context of the Cold War. Sen. Orrin Hatch, a senior Republican on
the Senate Intelligence Committee making those decisions, told my colleague
Robert Windrem that he would make the same call again today even knowing what
bin Laden would do subsequently. “It was worth it,” he said.
“Those
were very important, pivotal matters that played an important role in the
downfall of the Soviet Union,” he said.
Indeed,
the U.S. started backing Al Qaeda’s forefathers even before the Soviets invaded
Afghanistan. As Brzezinski told Le Nouvel Observateur in a 1998 interview:
Question:
The former director of the CIA, Robert Gates, stated in his memoirs ["From
the Shadows"], that American intelligence services began to aid the
Mujahadeen in Afghanistan 6 months before the Soviet intervention. In this
period you were the national security adviser to President Carter. You
therefore played a role in this affair. Is that correct?Brzezinski: Yes.
According to the official version of history, CIA aid to the Mujahadeen began
during 1980, that is to say, after the Soviet army invaded Afghanistan, 24 Dec
1979. But the reality, secretly guarded until now, is completely otherwise
Indeed, it was July 3, 1979 that President Carter signed the first directive
for secret aid to the opponents of the pro-Soviet regime in Kabul. And that
very day, I wrote a note to the president in which I explained to him that in
my opinion this aid was going to induce a Soviet military intervention.
***
Q: And neither do you regret having supported the Islamic fundamentalism, having given arms and advice to future terrorists?
Q: And neither do you regret having supported the Islamic fundamentalism, having given arms and advice to future terrorists?
B: What
is most important to the history of the world? The Taliban or the collapse of
the Soviet empire? Some stirred-up Moslems or the liberation of Central Europe
and the end of the cold war?
The
Washington Post reported in 2002:
The
United States spent millions of dollars to supply Afghan schoolchildren with
textbooks filled with violent images and militant Islamic teachings ….
The
primers, which were filled with talk of jihad and featured drawings of guns,
bullets, soldiers and mines, have served since then as the Afghan school
system’s core curriculum. Even the Taliban used the American-produced books ….
The
Council on Foreign Relations notes:
The 9/11
Commission report (PDF) released in 2004 said some of Pakistan’s religious
schools or madrassas served as “incubators for violent extremism.” Since then,
there has been much debate over madrassas and their connection to militancy.
***
New
madrassas sprouted, funded and supported by Saudi Arabia and U.S. Central
Intelligence Agency, where students were encouraged to join the Afghan
resistance.
And see
this.
Veteran
journalist Robert Dreyfuss writes:
For half
a century the United States and many of its allies saw what I call the “Islamic
right” as convenient partners in the Cold War.
***
In the
decades before 9/11, hard-core activists and organizations among Muslim
fundamentalists on the far right were often viewed as allies for two reasons,
because they were seen a fierce anti-communists and because the opposed secular
nationalists such as Egypt’s Gamal Abdel Nasser, Iran’s Mohammed Mossadegh.
***
By the
end of the 1950s, rather than allying itself with the secular forces of progress
in the Middle East and the Arab world, the United States found itself in league
with Saudi Arabia’s Islamist legions. Choosing Saudi Arabia over Nasser’s Egypt
was probably the single biggest mistake the United States has ever made in the
Middle East.
A second
big mistake … occurred in the 1970s, when, at the height of the Cold War and
the struggle for control of the Middle East, the United States either supported
or acquiesced in the rapid growth of Islamic right in countries from Egypt to
Afghanistan. In Egypt, Anwar Sadat brought the Muslim Brotherhood back to
Egypt. In Syria, the United States, Israel, and Jordan supported the Muslim
Brotherhood in a civil war against Syria. And … Israel quietly backed Ahmed
Yassin and the Muslim Brotherhood in the West Bank and Gaza, leading to the
establishment of Hamas.
Still
another major mistake was the fantasy that Islam would penetrate the USSR and
unravel the Soviet Union in Asia. It led to America’s support for the jihadists
in Afghanistan. But … America’s alliance with the Afghan Islamists long
predated the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in 1979 and had its roots in CIA
activity in Afghanistan in the 1960s and in the early and mid-1970s. The Afghan
jihad spawned civil war in Afghanistan in the late 1980s, gave rise to the
Taliban, and got Osama bin Laden started on building Al Qaeda.
Would
the Islamic right have existed without U.S. support? Of course. This is not a
book for the conspiracy-minded. But there is no question that the virulence of
the movement that we now confront—and which confronts many of the countries in
the region, too, from Algeria to India and beyond—would have been significantly
less had the United States made other choices during the Cold War.
In other
words, if the U.S. and our allies hadn’t backed the radical violent Muslims
instead of more stable, peaceful groups in the Middle East, radical Islam
wouldn’t have grown so large.
Pakistani
nuclear scientist and peace activist Perez Hoodbhoy writes:
Every
religion, including Islam, has its crazed fanatics. Few in numbers and small in
strength, they can properly be assigned to the “loony” section. This was true
for Islam as well until 1979, the year of the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan.
Indeed, there may well have been no 911 but for this game-changer.
***
Officials
like Richard Perle, Assistant Secretary of Defense, immediately saw Afghanistan
not as the locale of a harsh and dangerous conflict to be ended but as a place
to teach the Russians a lesson. Such “bleeders” became the most influential
people in Washington .
***
The task
of creating such solidarity fell upon Saudi Arabia, together with other
conservative Arab monarchies. This duty was accepted readily and they quickly
made the Afghan Jihad their central cause…. But still more importantly, to go
heart and soul for jihad was crucial at a time when Saudi legitimacy as the
guardians of Islam was under strong challenge by Iran, which pointed to the
continued occupation of Palestine by America’s partner, Israel. An increasing
number of Saudis were becoming disaffected by the House of Saud – its
corruption, self-indulgence, repression, and closeness to the US. Therefore,
the Jihad in Afghanistan provided an excellent outlet for the growing number of
militant Sunni activists in Saudi Arabia, and a way to deal with the daily
taunts of the Iranian clergy.
***
The
bleeders soon organized and armed the Great Global Jihad, funded by Saudi
Arabia, and executed by Pakistan. A powerful magnet for militant Sunni
activists was created by the US. The most hardened and ideologically dedicated
men were sought on the logic that they would be the best fighters.
Advertisements, paid for from CIA funds, were placed in newspapers and
newsletters around the world offering inducements and motivations to join the
Jihad.
American
universities produced books for Afghan children that extolled the virtues of
jihad and of killing communists. Readers browsing through book bazaars in
Rawalpindi and Peshawar can, even today, sometimes find textbooks produced as
part of the series underwritten by a USAID $50 million grant to the University
of Nebraska in the 1980′s . These textbooks sought to counterbalance Marxism
through creating enthusiasm in Islamic militancy. They exhorted Afghan children
to “pluck out the eyes of the Soviet enemy and cut off his legs”. Years after
the books were first printed they were approved by the Taliban for use in
madrassas – a stamp of their ideological correctness and they are still widely
available in both Afghanistan and Pakistan.
At the
international level, Radical Islam went into overdrive as its superpower ally,
the United States, funneled support to the mujahideen. Ronald Reagan feted
jihadist leaders on the White House lawn, and the U.S. press lionized them.
And the
chief of the visa section at the U.S. consulate in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia (J.
Michael Springmann, who is now an attorney in private practice) says that the
CIA insisted that visas be issued to Afghanis so they could travel to the U.S.
to be trained in terrorism in the United States, and then sent back to
Afghanistan to fight the Soviets.
CIA
Trained Ramzi Yousef and Other Key Terrorists
Moreover,
Jane’s Defense Weekly – a respected and widely-cited British military journal –
reported in October 2001 that Ramzi Yousef and the other World Trade Center
bombers were trained by the CIA and ISI (via the Internet Archive):
Pakistan’s
sinister Inter Services Intelligence (ISI) remains the key to providing
accurate information to the US-led alliance in its war against Osama bin Laden
and his Taliban hosts in Afghanistan. Known as Pakistan’s ‘secret army’ and
‘invisible government’, its shadowy past is linked to political assassinations
and the smuggling of narcotics as well as nuclear and missile components.
***
The ISI
chief, Lt Gen Mahmood Ahmed, who was visiting Washington when New York and the
Pentagon were attacked, agreed to share desperately needed information about
the Taliban with the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and other US security
officials. The CIA has well-established links with the ISI, having trained it
in the 1980s to ‘run’ Afghan mujahideen (holy Muslim warriors), Islamic
fundamentalists from Pakistan as well as Arab volunteers by providing them with
arms and logistic support to evict the Soviet occupation of Kabul.
***
After
the ignominious Soviet withdrawal from Kabul in 1989 the ISI, determined to
achieve its aim of extending Pakistan’s ‘strategic depth’ and creating an
Islamic Caliphate by controlling Afghanistan and the Central Asian Republics,
began sponsoring a little-known Pathan student movement in Kandhar that emerged
as the Taliban. The ISI used funds from Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto’s federal
government and from overseas Islamic remittances to enrol graduates from
thousands of madrassahs (Muslim seminaries) across Pakistan to bolster the
Taliban (Islamic students), who were led by the reclusive Mullah Muhammad Omar.
Thereafter, through a ruthless combination of bribing Afghanistan’s ruling
tribal coalition (which was riven with internecine rivalry), guerrilla tactics
and military support the ISI installed the Taliban regime in Kabul in 1996. It
then helped to extend its control over 95 per cent of the war-torn country and
bolster its military capabilities. The ISI is believed to have posted
additional operatives in Afghanistan just before the 11 September attacks in
the US. Along with Osama bin Laden, intelligence sources say a number of other
infamous names emerged from the 1980s ISI-CIA collaboration in Afghanistan.
These included Mir Aimal Kansi, who assassinated two CIA officers outside their
office in Langley, Virginia, in 1993, Ramzi Yousef and his accomplices involved
in the New York World Trade Center bombing five years later as well as a host
of powerful international narcotics smugglers.
Ramzi
Yousef was not only the mastermind of the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, but
also a key member of the Bojinka Plot … the blueprint for 9/11. And see this.
Bosnia
As
professor of strategy at the Naval War College and former National Security
Agency intelligence analyst and counterintelligence officer John R. Schindler
documents, the U.S. supported Bin Laden and other Al Qaeda terrorists in
Bosnia.
U.S. Let
Al Qaeda Escape After 9/11
Whatever
its origins, you would think – at the least – the U.S. hammered Al Qaeda after
9/11.
In
reality:
NBC News
notes that the U.S. allowed an airlift of Al Qaeda out of Afghanistan in 2001
Several high-level U.S. government officials claim that the U.S. intentionally let Bin Laden escape from Afghanistan
Several high-level U.S. government officials claim that the U.S. intentionally let Bin Laden escape from Afghanistan
We Support
Saudi Arabia and Other Sponsors of Terrorism
We noted
above that Saudi Arabia is backing the ISIS terrorists. The Saudi monarchy is
one of the most brutal dictatorships in the world, and yet the U.S. has been
heavily backing it for decades.
The Saudis
support the most extreme strain of Islamic terrorism, and may well have backed
the 9/11 hijackers And see this.
The U.S.
also heavily backs the other supporters of the ISIS terrorists, including
Qatar, Jordan, Kuwait, the United Arab Emirates, and Turkey. In other words, we
back direct sponsors of terrorists.
Conclusion:
A Long Legacy of Backing Evil
57 years
ago, the U.S. and Britain approved the use of Islamic extremists – including
the Muslim Brotherhood – in Syria.
According
to NBC News, the U.S. and Israel are supporting terrorists in Iran.
And the
U.S. intentionally armed Al Qaeda in Libya. Our backing of Sunni extremists in
Libya led to attacks on our embassies in Libya and Tunisia.
The
bottom line, sadly, is that the U.S. has backed the world’s most dangerous and
radical Muslim terrorists for decades. And see this.
Postscript:
A former high-level Al Qaeda commander has repeatedly alleged that ISIS works
for the CIA.
