Sunday, January 18, 2015

Mossad, May I Have a Word?


Mossad, May I Have a Word?
by Mary W Maxwell, PhD, LLB
Every now and then I hear that “Mossad” has done this, that, or the other thing; rarely is it anything good. The other day I heard someone claim that Westfield Malls in Australia, which is quite a reviled corporation, is a Mossad proprietary. And I thought only the CIA had proprietaries!
Mossad members, what’s the deal with you? Are you working for a cause? Some Mossad agents seem proud, and skilled. But isn’t it like being enslaved? I understand that you may be very daring, taking great risks to achieve what the boss wants. But why does he want whatever it is that he wants? He (or she) might be enslaved, too, you know.
Can anyone actually divine what ‘Israel’ wants? Is it even possible for a nation to want something? (Think about this question: “What does China want?” Could a billion souls merge their egos?) Where does your deepest allegiance lie, O Mossad? Is it to the state? Your agency came into existence way before the state of Israel. Who (really) pays your salary?
Are some of you guys just plain mercenaries? I am not addressing those persons here; I’m trying to reach the dedicated types. Maybe I can get to the heart of the matter by asking: What do you hope will appear on your tombstone? In what way do you expect your grandchildren to honor you? Has your work for Mossad got something to do with God?
I need to get to the bottom of this. Every time I turn around, somebody is saying, “The Mossad did 9-11.” Well, sorry, but the so-called government of the USA did 9-11. I mean they were in charge of the stand-down, the drill, the coordinating narrative, etc. When I say “they,” I have to mean persons who sat at official desks, such as Rummy and Dick.
If you were there, too, OK, you get some credit. The buzz is that you do explosives. Hmm. That means the Yanks could have hired any expert at explosives; they needn’t have dialed M for Mossad. Oh, but you were there with the explosives because 9-11 was your game? Oh dear! If so, we need to discuss it. I’ve been yelling at people who say 9-11 is Mossad.
It goes back a long way, you know. Conspiracy theorists (including moi) say that the three world wars were charted in 1880 or so. Say, are you under the impression that you are the advance guard of that group? How educated are you? Read any books about how this thing has proceeded over the centuries? Is the making of a world war (50 million died in WWII) a decent goal? Are you sure you want to work for it?
It can’t be that you are working for Jews-as-an-ethnic-group, or as a religious group, since the work you’re doing in the Middle East seems not to be of use to them. I suppose the average man on the street might think Mossad works to hold Israel together and therefore is pushing down any Arab countries that might help Palestine. But Arab countries don’t help Palestine. I’ll make an exception for Jordan taking a lot of refugees lately from Gaza, but that’s not the same as helping.
Let me get back to the structural issue here. Whom do you work for -- a global entity? If yes, what exactly is that entity? Have they got digs somewhere? Do they invite you to their Christmas party? Is your wife pleased about the whole thing -- or maybe you have a monastic celibacy? Are you clear as to the organization’s mission?
My hidden agendum is to appeal to your self-preservation as individuals. I strain my brain to discover the beauty of the three-world-war thing. I’m lucky to have leisure time in which to research history. But you don’t. You have to take the propaganda. Could be BS, couldn’t it? From afar it does look like you ‘agents’ are being used and abused.
And a quick biology lesson. Your motto is “By way of deception….” In the animal kingdom, deceit works only against a background of non-deceit. I mean, the creature has first to have a goal with some reality in the environment. Just as there can never be a perpetual motion machine, there can’t be deceit whose only power source is deceit. I think it’s a scientific impossibility. Correct me if I’m wrong.
Personally, I feel that Jewish people have contributed a lot to the world -- contributions that have nothing to do with playing a big, complicated game of deceit. Just ordinary human stuff. Perhaps especially related to justice. Where do you fit in that picture? Do you value those people?
The phrase “get a life” is demeaning and I normally wouldn’t use it, but I’m trying to find some way to suggest to you that you look into the possibility of doing something more… er… warm, than what you are doing. I honestly think you’re being had. Talk to your mother about it, or a couple of rabbis. You may be surprised to hear what they think of the Mossad.
Postscript. Oops, maybe the foregoing is off the mark. I just googled for ‘Mossad,’ and found this recruitment ad from Mossad’s website (quoted in Haaretz in 2014):
“All are welcome, regardless of religion, nationality or occupation, to contact our organization -- Mossad -- to work for us or to be involved in activities which could bring great personal benefit.”
OK, so you dedicated ones have to work side-by-side with mercenaries. Must be annoying.
-- Mary Maxwell is a dual citizen of US and Australia. She would like you to see her recent article: “Laurent Louis Didn’t (Exactly) Get Arrested for Using the F Word,” at the hottest mag in Oz, Gumshoenews.com. It’s linked below. Police in Brussels Get Violent with A Parliamentarian, Truly Shocking

Johnny B. Good


Letter to a Young Army Ranger (From an Old One)
http://www.lewrockwell.com/2015/01/no_author/letter-to-a-young-army-ranger-from-an-old-one/
Why the War on Terror Shouldn’t Be Your Battle
By Rory Fanning
TomDispatch.com
January 17, 2015
You’ve probably just graduated from high school and you’ve undoubtedly already signed an Option 40 contract guaranteeing you a shot at the Ranger indoctrination program (R.I.P.). If you make it through R.I.P. you’ll surely be sent off to fight in the Global War on Terror. You’ll be part of what I often heard called “the tip of the spear.”
The war you’re heading into has been going on for a remarkably long time. Imagine this: you were five years old when I was first deployed to Afghanistan in 2002. Now I’m graying a bit, losing a little up top, and I have a family. Believe me, it goes faster than you expect.
Once you get to a certain age, you can’t help thinking about the decisions you made (or that, in a sense, were made for you) when you were younger. I do that and someday you will, too. Reflecting on my own years in the 75th Ranger regiment, at a moment when the war you’ll find yourself immersed in was just beginning, I’ve tried to jot down a few of the things they don’t tell you at the recruiting office or in the pro-military Hollywood movies that may have influenced your decision to join. Maybe my experience will give you a perspective you haven’t considered.
I imagine you’re entering the military for the same reason just about everyone volunteers: it felt like your only option. Maybe it was money, or a judge, or a need for a rite of passage, or the end of athletic stardom. Maybe you still believe that the U.S. is fighting for freedom and democracy around the world and in existential danger from “the terrorists.” Maybe it seems like the only reasonable thing to do: defend our country against terrorism.
The media has been a powerful propaganda tool when it comes to promoting that image, despite the fact that, as a civilian, you were more likely to be killed by a toddler than a terrorist. I trust you don’t want regrets when you’re older and that you commendably want to do something meaningful with your life. I’m sure you hope to be the best at something. That’s why you signed up to be a Ranger.
Make no mistake: whatever the news may say about the changing cast of characters the U.S. is fighting and the changing motivations behind the changing names of our military “operations” around the world, you and I will have fought in the same war. It’s hard to believe that you will be taking us into the 14th year of the Global War on Terror (whatever they may be calling it now). I wonder which one of the 668 U.S. military bases worldwide you’ll be sent to.
In its basics, our global war is less complicated to understand than you might think, despite the difficult-to-keep-track-of enemies you will be sent after — whether al-Qaeda (“central,” al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, in the Magreb, etc.), or the Taliban, or al-Shabab in Somalia, or ISIS (aka ISIL, or the Islamic State), or Iran, or the al-Nusra Front, or Bashar al-Assad’s regime in Syria. Admittedly, it’s a little hard to keep a reasonable scorecard. Are the Shia or the Sunnis our allies? Is it Islam we’re at war with? Are we against ISIS or the Assad regime or both of them?
Just who these groups are matters, but there’s an underlying point that it’s been too easy to overlook in recent years: ever since this country’s first Afghan War in the 1980s (that spurred the formation of the original al-Qaeda), our foreign and military policies have played a crucial role in creating those you will be sent to fight. Once you are in one of the three battalions of the 75th Ranger Regiment, the chain-of-command will do its best to reduce global politics and the long-term good of the planet to the smallest of matters and replace them with the largest of tasks: boot polishing, perfectly made beds, tight shot groupings at the firing range, and your bonds with the Rangers to your right and left.
In such circumstances, it’s difficult — I know that well — but not impossible to keep in mind that your actions in the military involve far more than whatever’s in front of you or in your gun sights at any given moment. Our military operations around the world — and soon that will mean you — have produced all kinds of blowback. Thought about a certain way, I was being sent out in 2002 to respond to the blowback created by the first Afghan War and you’re about to be sent out to deal with the blowback created by my version of the second one.
I’m writing this letter in the hope that offering you a little of my own story might help frame the bigger picture for you.
Let me start with my first day “on the job.” I remember dropping my canvas duffle bag at the foot of my bunk in Charlie Company, and almost immediately being called into my platoon sergeant’s office. I sprinted down a well-buffed hallway, shadowed by the platoon’s “mascot”: a Grim-Reaper-style figure with the battalion’s red and black scroll beneath it. It hovered like something you’d see in a haunted house on the cinder block wall adjoining the sergeant’s office. It seemed to be watching me as I snapped to attention in his doorway, beads of sweat on my forehead. “At ease… Why are you here, Fanning? Why do you think you should be a Ranger?” All this he said with an air of suspicion.
Shaken, after being screamed out of a bus with all my gear, across an expansive lawn in front of the company’s barracks, and up three flights of stairs to my new home, I responded hesitantly, “Umm, I want to help prevent another 9/11, First Sergeant.” It must have sounded almost like a question.
“There is only one answer to what I just asked you, son. That is: you want to feel the warm red blood of your enemy run down your knife blade.”
Taking in his military awards, the multiple tall stacks of manila folders on his desk, and the photos of what turned out to be his platoon in Afghanistan, I said in a loud voice that rang remarkably hollowly, at least to me, “Roger, First Sergeant!”
He dropped his head and started filling out a form. “We’re done here,” he said without even bothering to look up again.
The platoon sergeant’s answer had a distinct hint of lust in it but, surrounded by all those folders, he also looked to me like a bureaucrat. Surely such a question deserved something more than the few impersonal and sociopathic seconds I spent in that doorway.
Nonetheless, I spun around and ran back to my bunk to unpack, not just my gear but also his disturbing answer to his own question and my sheepish, “Roger, First Sergeant!” reply. Until that moment, I hadn’t thought of killing in such an intimate way. I had indeed signed on with the idea of preventing another 9/11. Killing was still an abstract idea to me, something I didn’t look forward to. He undoubtedly knew this. So what was he doing?
As you head into your new life, let me try to unpack his answer and my experience as a Ranger for you.
Let’s start that unpacking process with racism:That was the first and one of the last times I heard the word “enemy” in battalion. The usual word in my unit was “Hajji.” Now, Hajji is a word of honor among Muslims, referring to someone who has successfully completed a pilgrimage to the Holy Site of Mecca in Saudi Arabia. In the U.S. military, however, it was a slur that implied something so much bigger.
The soldiers in my unit just assumed that the mission of the small band of people who took down the Twin Towers and put a hole in the Pentagon could be applied to any religious person among the more than 1.6 billion Muslims on this planet. The platoon sergeant would soon help usher me into group-blame mode with that “enemy.” I was to be taught instrumental aggression. The pain caused by 9/11 was to be tied to the everyday group dynamics of our unit. This is how they would get me to fight effectively. I was about to be cut off from my previous life and psychological manipulation of a radical sort would be involved. This is something you should prepare yourself for.
When you start hearing the same type of language from your chain-of-command in its attempt to dehumanize the people you are off to fight, remember that 93% of all Muslims condemned the attacks on 9/11. And those who sympathized claimed they feared a U.S. occupation and cited political not religious reasons for their support.
But, to be blunt, as George W. Bush said early on (and then never repeated), the war on terror was indeed imagined in the highest of places as a “crusade.” When I was in the Rangers, that was a given. The formula was simple enough: al-Qaeda and the Taliban represented all of Islam, which was our enemy. Now, in that group-blame game, ISIS, with its mini-terror state in Iraq and Syria, has taken over the role. Be clear again that nearly all Muslims reject its tactics. Even Sunnis in the region where ISIS is operating are increasingly rejecting the group. And it is those Sunnis who may indeed take down ISIS when the time is right.
If you want to be true to yourself, don’t be swept up in the racism of the moment. Your job should be to end war, not perpetuate it. Never forget that.
The second stop in that unpacking process should be poverty: After a few months, I was finally shipped off to Afghanistan. We landed in the middle of the night. As the doors on our C-5 opened, the smell of dust, clay, and old fruit rolled into the belly of that transport plane. I was expecting the bullets to start whizzing by me as I left it, but we were at Bagram Air Base, a largely secure place in 2002.
Jump ahead two weeks and a three-hour helicopter ride and we were at our forward operating base. The morning after we arrived I noticed an Afghan woman pounding at the hard yellow dirt with a shovel, trying to dig up a gaunt little shrub just outside the stone walls of the base. Through the eye-slit of her burqa I could just catch a hint of her aged face. My unit took off from that base, marching along a road, hoping (I suspect) to stir up a little trouble. We were presenting ourselves as bait, but there were no bites.
When we returned a few hours later, that woman was still digging and gathering firewood, undoubtedly to cook her family’s dinner that night. We had our grenade launchers, our M242 machine guns that fired 200 rounds a minute, our night-vision goggles, and plenty of food — all vacuum-sealed and all of it tasting the same. We were so much better equipped to deal with the mountains of Afghanistan than that woman — or so it seemed to us then. But it was, of course, her country, not ours, and its poverty, like that of so many places you may find yourself in, will, I assure you, be unlike anything you have ever seen. You will be part of the most technologically advanced military on Earth and you will be greeted by the poorest of the poor. Your weaponry in such an impoverished society will feel obscene on many levels. Personally, I felt like a bully much of my time in Afghanistan.
Now, it’s the moment to unpack “the enemy”: Most of my time in Afghanistan was quiet and calm. Yes, rockets occasionally landed in our bases, but most of the Taliban had surrendered by the time I entered the country. I didn’t know it then, but as Anand Gopal has reported in his groundbreaking book, No Good Men Among the Living, our war on terror warriors weren’t satisfied with reports of the unconditional surrender of the Taliban. So units like mine were sent out looking for “the enemy.” Our job was to draw the Taliban — or anyone really — back into the fight.
Believe me, it was ugly. We were often enough targeting innocent people based on bad intelligence and in some cases even seizing Afghans who had actually pledged allegiance to the U.S. mission. For many former Taliban members, it became an obvious choice: fight or starve, take up arms again or be randomly seized and possibly killed anyway. Eventually the Taliban did regroup and today they are resurgent. I know now that if our country’s leadership had truly had peace on its mind, it could have all been over in Afghanistan in early 2002.
If you are shipped off to Iraq for our latest war there, remember that the Sunni population you will be targeting is reacting to a U.S.-backed Shia regime in Baghdad that’s done them dirty for years. ISIS exists to a significant degree because the largely secular members of Saddam Hussein’s Ba’ath party were labeled the enemy as they tried to surrender after the U.S. invasion of 2003. Many of them had the urge to be reincorporated into a functioning society, but no such luck; and then, of course, the key official the Bush administration sent to Baghdad simply disbanded Saddam Hussein’s army and tossed its 400,000 troops out onto the streets at a time of mass unemployment.
It was a remarkable formula for creating resistance in another country where surrender wasn’t good enough. The Americans of that moment wanted to control Iraq (and its oil reserves). To this end, in 2006, they backed the Shia autocrat Nouri al-Maliki for prime minister in a situation where Shia militias were increasingly intent on ethnically cleansing the Sunni population of the Iraqi capital.
Given the reign of terror that followed, it’s hardly surprising to find former Baathist army officers in key positions in ISIS and the Sunnis choosing that grim outfit as the lesser of the two evils in its world. Again, the enemy you are being shipped off to fight is, at least in part, a product of your chain-of-command’s meddling in a sovereign country. And remember that, whatever its grim acts, this enemy presents no existential threat to American security, at least so says Vice President Joe Biden. Let that sink in for a while and then ask yourself whether you really can take your marching orders seriously.
Next, in that unpacking process, consider noncombatants: When unidentified Afghans would shoot at our tents with old Russian rocket launchers, we would guesstimate where the rockets had come from and then call in air strikes. You’re talking 500-pound bombs. And so civilians would die. Believe me, that’s really what’s at the heart of our ongoing war. Any American like you heading into a war zone in any of these years was likely to witness what we call “collateral damage.” That’s dead civilians.
The number of non-combatants killed since 9/11 across the Greater Middle East in our ongoing war has been breathtaking and horrifying. Be prepared, when you fight, to take out more civilians than actual gun-toting or bomb-wielding “militants.” At the least, an estimated 174,000 civilians died violent deaths as a result of U.S. wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan between 2001 and April 2014. In Iraq, over 70% of those who died are estimated to have been civilians. So get ready to contend with needless deaths and think about all those who have lost friends and family members in these wars, and themselves are now scarred for life. A lot of people who once would never have thought about fighting any type of war or attacking Americans now entertain the idea. In other words, you will be perpetuating war, handing it off to the future.
Finally, there’s freedom and democracy to unpack, if we’re really going to empty that duffel bag: Here’s an interesting fact that you might consider, if spreading freedom and democracy around the world was on your mind. Though records are incomplete on the subject, the police have killed something like 5,000people in this country since 9/11 — more, in other words, than the number of American soldiers killed by “insurgents” in the same period. In those same years, outfits like the Rangers and the rest of the U.S. military have killed countless numbers of people worldwide, targeting the poorest people on the planet. And are there fewer terrorists around? Does all this really make a lot of sense to you?
When I signed up for the military, I was hoping to make a better world. Instead I helped make it more dangerous. I had recently graduated from college. I was also hoping that, in volunteering, I would get some of my student loans paid for. Like you, I was looking for practical help, but also for meaning. I wanted to do right by my family and my country. Looking back, it’s clear enough to me that my lack of knowledge about the actual mission we were undertaking betrayed me — and you and us.
I’m writing to you especially because I just want you to know that it’s not too late to change your mind. I did. I became a war resister after my second deployment in Afghanistan for all the reasons I mention above. I finally unpacked, so to speak. Leaving the military was one of the most difficult but rewarding experiences of my life. My own goal is to take what I learned in the military and bring it to high school and college students as a kind of counter-recruiter. There’s so much work to be done, given the 10,000 military recruiters in the U.S. working with an almost $700 million advertising budget. After all, kids do need to hear both sides.
I hope this letter is a jumping off point for you. And if, by any chance, you haven’t signed that Option 40 contract yet, you don’t have to. You can be an effective counter-recruiter without being an ex-military guy. Young people across this country desperately need your energy, your desire to be the best, your pursuit of meaning. Don’t waste it in Iraq or Afghanistan or Yemen or Somalia or anywhere else the Global War on Terror is likely to send you.
As we used to say in the Rangers…
Lead the Way.

Terrified Police?


When you don't comprehend what the reason is, for what you are being asked to do (when you are dealing with the unknown), it can be stressful. When other people are affected by your actions, that can add even more stress to the situation.
I find that asking questions, can be helpful.
~~~
Police union VP: 'These officers are terrified'
http://www.koat.com/news/police-union-vp-these-officers-are-terrified/30770348
ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. —Earlier this week, two Albuquerque cops were charged with murder in connection with a highly controversial shooting.
Shaun Willoughby, the vice president of Albuquerque’s police union, says some officers are thinking about leaving the department and the reason is simple.
“These officers are terrified,” Willoughby said. “They are scared to do their job.”
Albuquerque police have been involved in more than 40 shootings since 2010. The game changer was James Boyd, a homeless camper armed with knives who was shot and killed by two officers in the foothills last spring.
“You're dealing with violently unstable, unpredictable people that are armed,” said Willoughby.
This week the officers who shot Boyd were charged with murder. Willoughby said some members of APD are now concerned about what might happen if they find themselves in a similar situation.
“They do not want to be the next one forced into this position,” Willoughby said.
Willoughby also said many are weighing whether working for APD is worth it.
“Is my love for this job and passion for law enforcement, does it supersede the impact that simply doing my job can have on my family?” Willoughby said.
An APD spokesperson declined comment Friday.

Video: -- SchiffReport: Will China Pull a “Switzerland” on the U.S. Dollar?


Peter Schiff Gives a good talk. He is very good about pointing out the financial traps stalking the world and making some pretty surprising predictions.
At about 6 minutes in Pete talks of the coming China revaluation to come...

The Honorable Dr Ron Paul Speaks His Mind On 2015 And Beyond


This is a long article authored by Ron Paul, and covers several topics. I have excerpted only a portion of each topic here.
This is a well written article with some deeply disturbing thoughts.
To Read the complete article go to the following link: http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article48949.html
------------------------------------------------------
Intro:
If Americans were honest with themselves they would acknowledge that the Republic is no more. We now live in a police state. If we do not recognize and resist this development, freedom and prosperity for all Americans will continue to deteriorate. All liberties in America today are under siege.
It didn't happen overnight. It took many years of neglect for our liberties > snip
Warfare/Welfare State Requires Police Control
As the size of government grew and cracks in the system became readily apparent, a federal police force was needed to regulate our lives and the economy, as well as to protect us from ourselves and make sure the redistribution of a shrinking economic pie was "fair" to all. Central economic planning requires an economic police force to monitor every transaction of all Americans. Special interests were quick to get governments to regulate everything we put in our bodies: food, medications, and even politically correct ideas. IRS employees soon needed to carry guns to maximize revenue collections.
The global commitment to perpetual war, though present for decades, exploded in size and scope after 9/11. If there weren't enough economic reasons to monitor everything we did, fanatics used the excuse of > snip
Fight for Equal Protection Distorted by 'War on Poverty'
Fifty years ago, as a result of Martin Luther King Jr.'s leadership in a plea for equal justice, LBJ declared war on poverty. Poverty was seen at that time as the major contributing factor in the plight of those living in the inner city. King's dream was to make sure all people will be judged by the "content of their character" and not by "the color of their skin." Good advice, but it was never followed. Residual racism remains, but the excuse for every shortcoming in the failed cities is said to be due to the color of one's skin. The very expensive war on poverty >snip
The Victimized Inner Cities
This social disruption has motivated the enthusiastic growth and militarization of our local police departments. The law and order crowd thrives on excessive laws and regulations that no US citizen can escape. The out-of-control war on drugs is the worst part, and it generates the greatest danger in poverty-ridden areas via out-of-control police. It is estimated that these conditions have generated up to 80,000 SWAT raids per year in the United States. Most are in poor neighborhoods and involve black homes and businesses being hit disproportionately. This involves a high percentage of no-knock > snip
The Victimized Inner Cities
This social disruption has motivated the enthusiastic growth and militarization of our local police departments. The law and order crowd thrives on excessive laws and regulations that no US citizen can escape. The out-of-control war on drugs is the worst part, and it generates the greatest danger in poverty-ridden areas via out-of-control police. It is estimated that these conditions have generated up to 80,000 SWAT raids per year in the United States. Most are in poor neighborhoods and involve black homes and businesses being hit disproportionately. This involves a high percentage of no-knock attacks. As can be expected many totally innocent people are killed in the process. Property damage is routine and compensation is rare. The routine use of civil forfeiture of property has become an abomination, totally out of control, which significantly contributes to the chaos. It should not be a surprise to see resentment building up against the police under these conditions. The violent reaction against local merchants in retaliation for police actions further aggravates the situation --hardly a recipe for a safe neighborhood.
Though poverty and excessive laws associated with the war on drugs > snip
The Rich Are Getting Richer, But Why?
Under an authoritarian regime, those in power take care of themselves. This always leads to poverty and discrepancy in wealth distribution. Eventually the social strife that is predictable leads to an overthrow of the government. The Soviet communist leaders never suffered from want, but even they were routed when the people in the Soviet system decided that they had had enough.
We must realize that we are not exempt from a breakdown of our system. The strife that we are witnessing is a reflection of a growing number of people who are recognizing the discrepancy between rich and poor, the weak and the powerful, Wall Street and Main Street. The courts are obviously failing at meting out justice fairly and impartially. Money and race have a lot to do with how arrests, convictions, and incarcerations are carried out. That provides motivation for some people to become angry and violently strike out against anyone who appears to have more than they do.
While the courts fail to follow the rules of equal >snip
Our Liberties Under Attack
The economic and moral decay of American society is reflected in the loss of liberties. This problem affects all Americans and not just the poor in the inner city. Gradual erosion of personal and economic liberty has proceeded for a century. The loss of our liberty has sharply accelerated since the 9/11 attacks. We have done to ourselves what no foreign enemy could have possibly accomplished.
Government surveillance provides the state with information that enables it to know our every move. The protection of the Fourth Amendment is gone. Many Americans are comfortable with the sacrifice of liberty for safety and accept the notion that government's key responsibility is to keep us safe. It's a nice dream but the truth is it can't do it. One thing for sure: if it tries, it will do so at the expense of liberty.
Welfare, for the rich or poor, cannot exist without the sacrifice of the principal of property ownership. Though it always starts small and justified for the "needy," the principle of wealth transfer incentivizes the special interests and the rich to obtain benefit at the expense of the poor. This occurs in al >snip
The Federal Government's War on Us
Tolerance is a favorable trait when it means acting without aggression toward others, but tolerance of the monster that has evolved in our government is not good. Instead of adding more government agencies to spy on the American people, we should be talking about eliminating the ones we have, at a cost the American taxpayers of over $80 billion per year.
We have lived with the global war on terrorism for over 13 years now, and the threat of terrorist attacks against Americans and American allies is worse than ever. Though a global threat exists, the greatest dangers for American citizens here at home have been caused by our own government. Our government's attacks on our liberties have been overwhelming and worse than anything any foreign power has ever done.
It's the federal government that leads the charge in all our domestic wars, which, in addition to the global war on terrorism, include the war on drugs, taxpayers, and poverty, all of which contribute to the constant war on our privacy. Today every American is a suspect. Our president has establ . snip
The US Empire: Who Does it Serve?
When Obama announced a shift in geopolitical interest to the Far East -- to keep an eye on China -- one TV anchor pointed out that the move seems quite logical since we have a lot of "business interests" in the region. It is, in fact, far from logical if one looks at the tragic mess US government interventionism has caused in the Middle East and the conflict the US government is stirring up with Russia over Ukraine.
Old-fashioned colonialism was deemed necessary by various European powers to secure natural resources along with control over sea lanes and markets for selling manufactured goods. European-style colonialism -- supporting a mercantilistic economy -- came to be seen as politically unrealistic and unnecessary. When free-trade principles were utilized, colonialism did not die; it only changed form. Mercantilism in various forms > snip
Blowback All Around: We Are Less Safe
Economic blowback and unintended consequences is one thing, but blowback from our needless and aggressive policies around the world is another, and every bit as dangerous. As we find ourselves increasingly engaged economically and militarily around the world, we can expect many more attacks on American interests. With so many military personnel abroad, they will be the easiest targets to be hit. But attacks similar in nature to the 9/11 attacks will remain a threat to our homeland. We will not be attacked because we are free and rich. The attacks will come from angry people who have had friends and relatives killed by America's careless and often vicious use of our military force in their countries.
It is not that difficult to feel resentment against a country that comes thousands of miles from home and bombs, invades, and punishes with sancti >snip
What to expect in 2015?
Foreign Affairs
More American troops will be sent overseas to places like Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, and Ukraine. There will be no military victories to brag about. More American military personnel will be killed in 2015 than in 2014. Military contractors will be used in growing numbers and their casualties will not be counted as military casualties.
The Ukraine civil war will not end, and the United States will be further bogged down in this conflict. Relations with Russia will continue to deteriorate. The neocons in Congress will gain even more influence over our foreign policy. Punishing sanctions will continue to be made more severe and push Russia further into China's sphere of influence. Gold will gain credibility as we isolate the Russians from the financial markets.
Sanctions on Russia will alienate Europe against the United States. The British oil industry will suffer from the "conspiracy" of the US and Saudi Arabia to drive oil prices down to punish Russia.
The military-industrial complex will continue to thrive and make even more money with the greater influence of the neocons in the new Congress. Supplemental budgets for the military should be expected, along with covert assistance and additional foreign aid to finance the management of our Empire.
Our enemies' strength will grow and prompt even more abuse of American citizens' privacy and free expression. We should not be surprised if there is a reigniting of the conflict in the Balkans. The first of the color revolutions in 2000 in Serbia can hardly be claimed a permanent victory. Generally, bombs from outsiders don't solve internal problems. Those problems must eventually be solved from within a country rather than from outside interference.
The US and NATO announced that the 13 year war in Afghanistan has ended. There has been neither the pretense of "Mission Accomplished" nor an admission of outright failure, along with an exodus. In reality the war has not ended and instead will continue for a long time. No victory for US policy is possible. The conflict will actually spread and increase in intensity since our goals are undefinable and therefore the war is un-winnable.
Sanity will not return to US leaders until our financial system collapses -- an event for which they are feverishly working
Domestic issues
An honest assessment of the economy will not reveal any significant improvement in 2015. Inflation will continue to plague us, possibly even with the government-rigged CPI figures showing an increase. But the true inflation of the Fed's credit creation, as well as the subsequent mal- investment and the various bubbles bursting will accelerate. Debt in all categories will continue to increase at unsustainable rates. The Fed will not permit interest rates to rise -- at least on purpose. Eventually the market will demand that rates do rise, however.
Tax revenues will continue to rise, aiding the policy of the government spending the people's money rather than those who earned it. Regulations, even with (or maybe especially with) a Republican Congress will continue to increase and make the Federal Register more incomprehensible. Friction between the middle class and the one percent, many of whom are living off government privileges, will escalate further and be reflected in confrontations especially in the large cities. Financial currency controls will continue to expand especially with cross-border transactions.
Blowback and unintended consequences from our sanctions and foreign policy in general will continue to threaten our domestic security and our economy, as well as > snip
Conclusion: Toward a Peaceful Revolution
Authoritarianism has overtaken our economic system as the welfare mentality takes over at every level of government. Once the initiation of force by government is accepted by the people, even minimally, it escalates and involves every aspect of society. The only question that remains is just who gets to wield the power to distribute the largess to their friends and chosen beneficiaries. It's a recipe for steady growth of the government at the expense of liberties, even if official documents and laws written to limit government power are in place. Planting even small seeds of monopoly power in the hands of a few people in government, whether democratically elected or not, will always metastasize like a cancer. This was Jefferson's concern when he advised that "[t]he tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time." He believed the people must warn the rulers that taking up arms against the government is legitimate if the government fails to protect the people's liberty.
This should be a consideration. But if the spirit of liberty is not alive and well in the hearts and minds of the people, violence alone against the government will not be a solution. History has shown that, more often than not, people who rebel against abusive governments, whether run by kings or modern day dictators, do not gain much -- overthrowing one dictator and replacing him with another just as bad. A clear understanding of the nature and source of liberty is required for revolutions to be beneficial. Restraining the few who thrive on the use of force to rule over us is the challenge. Fortunately they are outnumbered by those who would choose liberty yet lack the will to challenge the humanitarian monsters who gain support from naive and apathetic citizens. All positive revolutions must be philosophic in nature to make a difference. Violence alone achieves nothing.
Before we can actually restore our liberties, we most likely will have to become a lot less free and much poorer. This is sad since correct and workable answers are available to us if only the people understood them and demanded liberty and honesty, rather than being dependent on excessive government power and believing the false promises of politicians.
Even with the problems we face today and the bleak outlook for the coming year there's much to encourage us. During this next year there will be the continuation of many more people recognizing the failure of government to create peace and prosperity. More widespread understanding of this truth is required in order to bring about a successful revolution.
The freedom movement, especially with many young people involved, will grow in numbers and influence.
Current monetary policy and the Federal Reserve will continue to lose credibility, especially with the next bailout. Although "too big to fail" will stay in place, it will further alienate Main Street America causing it to rebel against the system.
The real problem of course is that too many "stupid people" are IN our government and have high visibility on the major TV networks. There will be plenty of people, not officially associated with government, who will rebel against various governments around the world. The sentiments supporting secession, jury nullification, nullification of federal laws by state legislatures, and a drive for more independence from larger governments will continue.
We should not be discouraged. Enlightenment is not nearly as difficult to achieve as it was before the breakthrough with Internet communications occurred. Besides we must remember that "an idea whose time has come" cannot be stopped by armies, demagogues, politicians, or even Fox News or MSNBC. The time has come for the ideas of liberty to prevail. I smell progress. Let's make 2015 a fun year for LIBERTY.
Dr. Ron Paul
Project Freedom
http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article48949.html

That Very First Billboard Decoded in ''They Live'' Wasn’t Put There by Accident - Photo


They Live, We Sleep: How the Control of Data Allows an Invisible Government to Rule in Secret.
In the prescient and unsettling-but-realistically-surreal alter-reality 1988 cult classic They Live directed by John Carpenter, there are many clues about the real-life police state scientific dictatorship we’re all living under today.
Before the pivotal, iconic turning point when Rowdy Roddy Piper first puts on the Hoffman sunglasses and sees the very first subliminal billboard to “Obey,” there is another subtle message for the police state technocracy to come….
The regular billboard – before revealing the hidden message “Obey” – carries an advertisement for a company called “Control Data” and reads, “We’re creating the transparent computing environment.”
Via Wikipedia: “Control Data Corporation (CDC) was a supercomputer firm. CDC was one of the nine major United States computer companies through most of the 1960s; the others were IBM, Burroughs Corporation, DEC, NCR, General Electric, Honeywell, RCA, and UNIVAC. CDC was well-known and highly regarded throughout the industry at the time.”
During the sixties, CDC created what were considered the fastest computers in the world at the time.
“We’re creating the transparent computing environment…”
What sad irony when considered in the context of a movie where an alien race is using that same “transparent” system to control everyone’s minds through frequency manipulation and subliminal messages.
Control [of] Data, yes? Read More

Zionist Puppets for President


Newsletter:
[Editor's Note: It's not realistic to expect to see a non Zionist-approved candidate to be a serious contender for President in 2016. However, that doesn't mean that someone who will put America's interest in front of Israel's won't emerge in the next year to give the Israeli-owned sellouts a run for their Zio-money. Ron Paul was the only recent candidate who had some chance of winning, if the Illuminati had not boxed him out using their media and helped him to "lose" primaries that he had actually won. It's regrettable that his son, Rand Paul, has proven beyond all doubt that he will grovel to the Zionists, genuflect before Israel, and turn his back on the Palestinian people in order to advance his political aspirations instead of playing a role in saving America from the World Conquerors, but c'est la vie. He's shown his colors. A golden opportunity exists, however, for some ambitious, patriotic congressman out there who is willing to step into the breech and represent the desires of the vast majority of Americans who want to be free of the Zio serpent and its agents.
Hillary is not going to win regardless of who runs against her. You can take that to the bank. Illuminati made-man, Netanyahu-butt boy, Ted Cruz, thinks he's going to make it, and thinks he's going to bamboozle the public into accepting his Canadian birth and Cuban father as being of no consequence in his eligibility to run, but I've got news for him. Wait until he formally announces and watch the firestorm erupt over his eligibility issue. For Americans who can still think and care about America's future, they need to ask themselves if there is even one person in the House or one governor who is still loyal to the American people and its constitution and is willing to reject the AIPAC loyalty pledge to Israel? Suggestions.]
Zionist Puppets for President by Texe Marrs (Jan. 12, 2015)
http://libertyfight.com/2015/Texe_Marrs_zionist_puppets_for_president.html
TexeMarrs.com
PowerOfProphecy.com
ConspiracyWorld.com
It's 2015 and everyone is getting in line to campaign for President of the U.S.A. The Democrats, of course, are set to run Hillary Clinton. But, standing by are Vice President Joe Biden, Senator Jim Webb (Va.), and possibly Senator Elizabeth Warren (Ma.), the lilly-white New Englander who still maintains she is really a Native American Indian. However, it's the Republican Party that has the most interesting candidates. The GOP is literally brimming over with would-be White House residents.
Only Zionists Are Welcome
Now, I've combed the records on these Republican presidential wannabes and, to my non-surprise, all are outspoken Zionists, pro-Israel to the core. There is not a Palestinian supporter among them.
There are some thirteen Republicans prepping for the presidential race, and not a one dares to criticize the little nation state of Israel. The thirteen don't mind challenging Putin and Russia- behemoth nation of over 150 million population with a huge nuclear missile force. They've got the guts to take on any nation on earth. But not Israel!
As far as Israel goes, the candidates all give a yell, "We love everything you do." Israel is, for these men, a saintly example of a nation full of perfected god-men, led by an angel named Netanyahu.
Rand Paul Meets With Jews Every Day
Rand Paul, son of Ron, brags he is a stout defender of Israel. Rand says he has visits "every day" from the Jews. That's every day.
It seems that Rand is going to do his best to keep Israel from being sullied by charges of genocide and ethnic cleansing. When it came out in the press recently that Palestine was considering taking up such charges with the International Criminal Court, Rand Paul rushed in to the rescue. He introduced legislation that would punish Palestine for this indiscretion by having U.S. aid money cut off.
Rand Paul's visits every day from the Jewish crowd reminds me of evangelist Billy Graham, who once told Larry King, host of CNN's Larry King Show, that each morning he consulted by phone with Rabbi Tannenbaum of New York. "The rabbi gives me spiritual direction every day," said Graham.
President Obama reportedly told Sarkozy of France, that he, too, hears from the Jews every day, specifically, from Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
Imagine, our President, the top evangelist in the world [Billy Graham], and a U.S. Senator, consulting every day with Jewish overlords! From a tiny nation of just seven million! There's no contact "every day" with Red Chinese officials (one billion-plus population), or India (800 million population), Indonesia (220 million) or Brazil (120 million). Only from teeny-tiny Israel, so little a nation that five Israels would fit in one state of Texas!
Jewish Agents and Private Jets
Speaking of Texas, that state's Senator Ted Cruz, a gargantuan Israel fan, flew to Israel to meet with officials and receive marching orders twice in the two months just before he took office. He flew with Senator Mitch McConnell (now Majority Leader of the Senate) on McConnell's private jet.
Cruz's wife [Heidi Cruz], by the way, is employed by Goldman Sachs Bank, and his dad [Cuban born Raphael Cruz became a US citizen in 2005 two years after Ted became Texas Solicitor General in anticipation of his Zio-funded, meteoric ascension from US Senator (won in Nov. 2012, thanks to the funding of the billionaire Jewish Koch brothers and Zionist flunky Sarah Palin) to US President in 2016 ] preaches "pro-Zionism" at churches in South Texas [including the web site run by Suzanne Hinn, wife of TBN's Christian-Zionist and occasional satanic hand flasher, Benny Hinn].
Senator Rick Santorum was assigned a Jewish agent upon his first attaining his Senate post. The Jewish agent made sure that Santorum kept the straight party line (Zionism 24/7).
Governor Mike Huckabee is yet another Zionist clone. He goes to Israel at least annually to meet with big-wigs there. Huckabee claims, "God gave Israel the title to this land 3,000 years ago."
Really? I'd like to see a copy of that title. I believe that Jesus tore it up when, in Matthew 23 and 24, He told the Jews they were "of their father, the devil." Jesus also said that the House of Israel was "left desolate" until He returns. Maybe Huckabee, a Baptist preacher, reads the Old Testament, but forgets those new additions in the New Testament.
Rick Perry Does the Hatikvah
Governor Rick Perry of Texas has merrily done the Hatikvah circle dance with a group of black-suited, bearded rabbis. Once he did this dance inside the governor's office. More recently, in 2014, he repeated his splendid dance performance outside the Capital, in Austin. Perry also flies regularly to Israel in a private jet with his Jewish adviser, a well-known rabbi [Rabbi Irwin Katsof, President and CEO, Global Capital Associates], who also just happens to be a prime financier for the governor who wants to be president.
To Las Vegas They Came
Billionaire Jewish casino mogul Sheldon Adelson stated in 2012 that he had $100 million to donate to Republicans who backed Israel, which means every single one of them. Today, he probably has even more set aside. Adelson and his billionaire Jewish pals had, a big meeting in Las Vegas in 2014 and flew in a half-dozen or so Republican presidential wannabes. Among them was Governor John Kasich of Ohio, who pandered to Adelson right from the rostrum, addressing Adelson as, "My good friend, Sheldon."
Governor Scott Walker of Wisconsin was at Adelson's exclusive meeting. He told the audience how much he sincerely loves Judaism and Israel. "I have a menorah in my home," he boasted. Walker and other Wisconsin politicians received $650,000 from Adelson in 2014.
Governor Chris Christie was on hand, too, at Adelson's shindig. He personally met with Adelson and assured the old codger billionaire of his total dedication to Israel. Christie also traveled to Israel, where he had the photographers take the usual photos of the governor at the Jewish wailing wall wearing a yarmulke skull cap.
Very fashionable, those skull caps. I have in my office a sizable collection of pictures of Popes, Presidents, Senators, and other Zionist kiss-ups paying their allegiance to the wailing wall, wearing the little black cap. Why is it that every time I see an American politician wearing the skull cap at the wall, I feel like wailing?
Finally, there's Jeb Bush. He's an undeclared candidate, though it seems assured that he will run. Old Jeb recently gave up all his lucrative corporate board positions to make himself look pristine- for example, he left the board of healthcare insurance giant Tenet, Inc. Very kind of Jeb to take all that money all these years from Tenet, a Jewish-owned firm awash with cash from its involvement in the ongoing ObamaCare scam.
Jeb enthusiastically admits he is a Zionist and, like his brother "W," will defend Israel exactly the same way he would defend America.
In fact, all these guys insist that their love of Israel causes them to put American servicemen at risk in various ways to build a Greater Israel. This also causes them to totally reject the Palestinians - men, women, and kids- who, of course, are all loathsome terrorists carrying around thousands of bottle rockets in their back pockets.
It seems, too, that most of these guys continue to vote for billions [more than Three BILLION each and every year] of U.S. taxpayer dollars for the military needs [?] of Israel. But for the Palestinians, that's entirely another thing. Why, not a one of these politicians has ever set even one toe on Palestinian soil. They love to visit Israel and to be seen with Netanyahu and other Jewish officials while going to lush parties and galas. That leaves the Palestinians, who have only a demolished, bombed-out country, and are forced to hunker down when the Israeli Defense Forces come ravaging, out in the cold. No need to talk to the Palestinians- some Zionists say they don't even exist, anyway.
Jews Have Clout and Cash
It doesn't take a brilliant analyst to figure out why the Republicans gravitate towards their Jewish friends. The Jews have tons of media clout, and they have boatloads of cash to pass out to Republican candidates who behave. So these Republicans have it all figured out. It is best that they continue their slavish adoration of Jews and Israel. If they ever depart from being toadys to Israel, they all know it's bye-bye White House!
Texe Marrs