Friday, February 27, 2015

YOU DO NOTHING - THEY WILL DO EVERYTHING IN THEIR POWER TO SCREW YOU



BAD BAD BAD BAD NEWS

Despite your calls, the Republican-controlled Senate Judiciary Committee voted 12-8 today to advance Barack Obama's pick to succeed disgraced anti-gun Attorney General Eric Holder.


I don't need to tell you how dangerous another anti-gun Attorney General would be for our Second Amendment.

Unfortunately, since confirmation hearings began last month, Loretta Lynch has dodged virtually every question relating to your gun rights, and has shown no signs she'd be any less anti-gun than Eric Holder.
Even worse, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (BATF) has since dropped a bombshell on gun owners: a ban on M855 Ammunition, commonly used in the AR-15.


If the Republican-controlled Senate confirms Loretta Lynch, it's crystal clear she'll move full speed ahead with the ammo ban, and as much of Barack Obama's anti-gun agenda as possible.


That's why I hope you'll take a moment to contact your U.S. Senators and urge them to OPPOSE Gun-Grabber Loretta Lynch's nomination.

Here's how to reach them:

*** Sen. John Cornyn -
(202) 224-2934

*** Sen. Ted Cruz - (202) 224-5922
Thank you for taking immediate action.
For Freedom,

- Dudley Brown,
President, National Association for Gun Rights
**********************************************************************
WHEN ARE THE AMERICAN PEOPLE GOING TO WAKE UP? WHEN THE POLITICIANS CONTROL EVERY PART OF YOUR LIFE????? THIS IS WHAT HITLER DID, AND LOOK WHERE THAT GOT THE GERMAN PEOPLE - A FREE TRIP TO THE DEATH CAMPS - AKA FEMA.   BUT IT CAN'T HAPPEN HERE.   WELL, IT IS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
*********************************************************************************************

Dear Fellow Patriot,   He's calling it quits!                    
Eric Holder, the Attorney General who oversaw the Justice Department's botched gun-running scheme, "Operation Fast and Furious," leaving a border patrol agent dead, announced his resignation earlier this year. Good riddance!
                    

But with the exit of the nation's most anti-gun Attorney General, it's vital gun owners keep a keen eye on the Senate's approval process for the next Attorney General.

                               That's going to happen very soon.



You see, Obama tapped New York Federal Prosecutor Loretta Lynch to succeed Eric Holder as the next Attorney General.

If the idea of a U.S. District Attorney, straight from the gun control bastion of New York City concerns you, then I hope you'll take action.

 

That's because if your Senators don't ask Ms. Lynch the tough questions, we might end up with yet another gun-grabbing Attorney General.

Sadly, gun owners have come to expect that Senate Republicans will do exactly what they have done each time an Obama nominee comes up... roll over like lap dogs.

Remember, NAGR had serious reservations about Eric Holder when he was first selected.

And even with his past record of radical views regarding the Second Amendment, 19 Republican Senators still voted to confirm Holder.

When asked why he voted to confirm Holder, former Missouri Senator Kit Bond replied, "He's a good listener." (With dumb shits like this in the CON-gress, how can you expect ANYTHING POSITIVE FOR AMERICA TO BE ACCOMPLISHED??)
The Senate's vetting process is there for a reason, and when it's so blatantly disregarded like that, it can lead to serious abuses of power.
For the last six years: 
 
*** Eric Holder used his position to enforce Barack Obama's unconstitutional executive actions and to crack down on law-abiding gun buyers, sellers, and owners;

*** Eric Holder has used his post to push for more gun control, including banning semi-automatic firearms, standard-capacity magazines, and private firearm sales through an expanded government background check and gun registration system, and;

*** Because of his unprofessional conduct, Eric Holder was held in contempt of Congress.

That's why it's vital your U.S. Senators don't let another Obama-appointee breeze through the Senate without answering the tough questions.

Fresh off winning back the Senate, some high-ranking Republicans are already showing signs of kowtowing to the President's demands once again.

U.S. Senator Orrin Hatch of Utah, who
previously voted for Holder, has already given his tacit support for Loretta Lynch.

He hasn't even met her yet!

So has South Carolina Senator Lindsey Graham, who wanted to let Harry Reid and the lame-duck Democrats take the vote before they hand over control of the Senate.

We were all told this year that the most important thing for Second Amendment rights was a Republican takeover of the U.S. Senate.

But what good is a Republican controlled Senate if they are willing to simply green-light every nominee that Obama hands down to them?

After all, Hatch and Graham aren't the only Republicans showing weakness right after winning back the Senate.

Republicans like Tennessee's Lamar Alexander and Alabama's Jeff Sessions have a history of rubber-stamping the President's nominees.

Many of these same beltway insiders claim that "slowing down the President's nominees is just obstructionism," and that Lynch is "just a place holder."

I hope you don't fall for these excuses. The fact is that vetting the President's nominees is the constitutional duty of Senators.

And over the past several years we've seen just how destructive confirming an anti-gun Attorney General can be.

With most of the damage happening behind the scenes, away from transparency or public recorded votes.

Quite frankly, Ms. Lynch's lack of a public stance on your Second Amendment rights should be very concerning.

That's why it's vital the Senate gets Ms. Lynch on record with specific and concise answers on how she views the Second Amendment.
1.) Does Lynch think that the President's gun control agenda is Constitutional? Would she stand up against it?
2.) What reforms would Lynch set in place so that we never have another gun-running scandal such as Fast and Furious?
3.) Would Lynch follow in the footsteps of Holder by allowing the Justice Department to arbitrarily ban the import of legal firearms?
As the nations top-cop overseeing the FBI, ATF, and the NICS Background check system, Lynch would have significant influence over your gun rights.

But I'm afraid if Loretta Lynch's nomination ends up being just another dog and pony show where she's allowed to dodge questions, we'll end up with an Eric Holder repeat.
That's why I hope you'll sign this Citizens' Directive to your U.S. Senators right now, urging them to get to the bottom of where Loretta Lynch stands on your Second Amendment rights.

If Loretta Lynch dodges these questions -- or worse, answers anti-gun -- your petition will also direct your U.S. Senators to simply vote NO.

For Freedom,

Signature
Dudley Brown
President
National Association for Gun Rights
P.S. The confirmation of disgraced anti-gun Attorney General Eric Holder's replacement, Loretta Lynch, could move fast.

She's a New York Prosecutor, and we have no idea where she stands on your right to keep-and-bear arms.

If you don't want to see a repeat of Eric Holder's anti-gun reign over the Justice Department, please
click here and sign your Citizens' Directive to your U.S. Senators right now.


The National Association for Gun Rights is a nonprofit, nonpartisan, single-purpose citizens' organization dedicated to preserving and protecting the Constitutionally protected right-to-keep-and-bear-arms through an aggressive program designed to mobilize public opposition to anti-gun legislation. The National Association for Gun Rights' mailing address is P.O. Box 7002, Fredericksburg, VA 22404. They can be contacted toll-free at 1-877-405-4570. Its web address is
www.NationalGunRights.org

Not produced or e-mailed at taxpayer expense.

To help the National Association for Gun Rights grow, please forward this to a friend.

To view this email as a web page, please click this link:
view online
.

Help fight gun control.
Donate to the National Association for Gun Rights!

ISLAM IS A 'PEACEFUL' RELIGION - EXAMPLES PROVIDED



 BUT  BUT   BUT  BUT  BUT  BUT  BUT  ISLAM IS A PEACEFUL RELIGION!!!!!

ISIS Executes 3 Women, Arrests 13 Others for Refusing to Marry Fighters

 
 
 
****************

ISIS Hospitals: Militants Whip Patients Who Disagree With Doctors; Prevent Women in Labor From Receiving Pain Killers at Night

 
*********************
 

UN Report on ISIS: 24,000 Killed, Injured by Islamic State; Children Used as Soldiers, Women Sold as Sex Slaves

Christian women in this article were shown in veils and chains
 
 
 
*********************

Ex Female ISIS Member: I Saw Teen Boy Crucified, Man Beheaded and Knew I Had to Escape

http://www.christianpost.com/news/ex-female-isis-member-i-saw-teen-boy-crucified-man-beheaded-and-knew-i-had-to-escape-127598/
 
 
*****************
 

ISIS Sex Slave Price: 1- to 9-Year-Old Christian, Yazidi Girls Sold for $172

 
*********************
 

If Islamic Terrorists Are Devout Muslims, Why Are They Hooked on Porn?








NOW - GEE WHIZ!  WHY DO YOU SUPPOSE THAT ISIS AND ASSOCIATED DEMON TERRORISTS (HEZBOLLAH, AL-QAEDA, MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD, ISIS, ET AL....
http://news.yahoo.com/uae-lists-over-80-muslim-terrorist-groups-202236607.html) AND ISLAM IN GENERAL IS ACQUIRING SUCH DISTAIN FROM THE PEOPLE OF THE WORLD?  WHY DO YOU SUPPOSE PEOPLES IN MANY NATIONS ARE RUNNING THEM OUT, CHASING THEM IN THE PROCESS WITH FORKS AND HEAVY WEAPONRY?



"To the Shores of Tripoli"

"To the Shores of Tripoli"
  
Great piece on history that is related to our times,
And why the Marine Hymn Contains the Verse,
"To the Shores of Tripoli"
  
Muslim Pirates of the Past  
Most Americans are unaware of the fact that over two hundred years ago, the
United States had declared war on Islam, and Thomas Jefferson led the charge! 
 
At the height of the eighteenth century, Muslim pirates were the
terror of the Mediterranean and a large area of the North Atlantic.
 
They attacked every ship in sight, and held the crews for exorbitant
ransoms.  Those taken hostage were subjected to barbaric
treatment and wrote heart breaking letters home, begging their
government and family members to pay whatever their Mohammedan captors
demanded.
 
These extortionists of the high seas represented the Islamic nations
of Tripoli, Tunis, Morocco, and Algiers collectively referred to as
the Barbary Coast and presented a dangerous and unprovoked threat to
the new American Republic.
 
Before the Revolutionary War, U.S. merchant ships had been under the
protection of Great Britain.  When the U.S. declared its
independence and entered into war, the ships of the United States were
protected by France. However, once the war was won, America had to
protect its own fleets.
 
Thus, the birth of the U.S. Navy.  Beginning in 1784, seventeen years
before he would become president, Thomas Jefferson became Americas
Minister to France.  That same year, the U.S. Congress sought to
appease its Muslim adversaries by following in the footsteps of
European nations who paid bribes to the Barbary States, rather than
engaging them in war.
 
In July of 1785, Algerian pirates captured American ships, and the Dye
of Algiers demanded an unheard-of ransom of $60,000.  It was a
plain and simple case of extortion, and Thomas Jefferson was
vehemently opposed to any further payments.  Instead, he proposed
to Congress the formation of a coalition of allied nations who
together could force the Islamic states into peace.  A
disinterested Congress decided to pay the ransom.
 
In 1786, Thomas Jefferson and John Adams met with Tripolis ambassador
to Great Britain to ask by what right his nation attacked American
ships and enslaved American citizens, and why Muslims held so much
hostility towards America, a nation with which they had no previous
contacts.

The two future presidents reported that Ambassador Sidi Haji Abdul Rahman
Adja had answered that Islam "was founded on the Laws of their
Prophet, that it was written in their Quran, that all nations who
should not have acknowledged their authority were sinners, that it was
their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be
found, and to make slaves of all they could take as Prisoners, and
that every Musselman (Muslim) who should be slain in Battle was sure
to go to Paradise."
 
Despite of this stunning admission of premeditated violence on
non-Muslim nations, as well as the objections of many notable American
leaders, including George Washington,
who warned that caving in was
both wrong and would only further embolden the enemy
. For the
following fifteen years, the American government paid the Muslims
millions of dollars for the safe passage of American ships or the
return of American hostages. The payments in ransom and tribute
amounted to over twenty percent of the United States government annual
revenues in 1800.

Jefferson was disgusted.  Shortly after his being sworn in as the third
President of the United States in 1801, the Pasha of Tripoli sent him
a note demanding the immediate payment of $225,000 plus $25,000 a year
for every year forthcoming.  That changed everything.

Jefferson let the Pasha know, in no uncertain terms, what he could do with his
demand.  The Pasha responded by cutting down the flagpole at the
American consulate and declared war on the United States.  Tunis,
Morocco, and Algiers immediately followed suit.  Jefferson, until
now, had been against America raising a naval force for anything
beyond coastal defense, but having watched his nation be cowed by
Islamic thugery for long enough, decided that is was finally time to
meet force with force.
 
He dispatched a squadron of frigates to the Mediterranean and taught
the Muslim nations of the Barbary Coast a lesson he hoped they would
never forget.  Congress authorized Jefferson to empower U.S.
ships to seize all vessels and goods of the Pasha of Tripoli and to
cause to be done all other acts of precaution or hostility as the
state of war would justify.
 
When Algiers and Tunis, who were both accustomed to American cowardice
and acquiescence, saw the newly independent United States had both the
will and the might to strike back, they quickly abandoned their
allegiance
to Tripoli.  The war with Tripoli lasted for four more
years, and raged up again in 1815.  The bravery of the U.S.
Marine Corps in these wars led to the line to the shores of Tripoli
in the Marine Hymn, 
and they would forever be known as leathernecks
for the leather collars of their uniforms, designed to prevent their
heads from being cut off by the Muslim scimitars when boarding enemy
ships.
    
  
Islam, and what its Barbary followers justified doing in the name of
their prophet and their god, disturbed Jefferson quite deeply.
 
America had a tradition of religious tolerance, the fact that Jefferson,
himself, had co-authored the Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom,
but fundamentalist Islam was like no other religion the world had ever
seen.  A religion based on supremacism, whose holy book not only
condoned but mandated violence against unbelievers was unacceptable to
him.  His greatest fear was that someday this brand of Islam
would return and pose an even greater threat to the United States.
 
This should bother every American.  That Muslims have brought
about women-only classes and swimming times at taxpayer-funded
universities and public pools; that Christians, Jews, and Hindus have
been banned from serving on juries where Muslim defendants are being judged,
Piggy banks and Porky Pig tissue dispensers have been banned from workplaces
because they offend Islamist sensibilities.

Ice cream has been discontinued at certain Burger King locations because
the picture on the wrapper looks similar to the Arabic script for Allah,
public schools are pulling pork from their menus, on and on in
the newspapers….
 
Its death by a thousand cuts, or inch-by-inch as some refer to it,
and most Americans have no idea that this battle is being waged every
day across America.  By not fighting back, by allowing groups to
obfuscate what is really happening, and not insisting that the
Islamists adapt to our own culture, the United States is cutting its
own throat with a politically correct knife, and helping to further
the Islamists agenda. Sadly, it appears that todays America would
rather be politically correct than victorious.

Any doubts, just
Google Thomas Jefferson vs the Muslim 

Regulators OK 'net neutrality' rules for Internet providers

Regulators OK 'net neutrality' rules for Internet providers


Feb 26, 1:24 PM (ET)
By ANNE FLAHERTY

(AP) Rob Thorp, a member of Backbone Campaign, demonstrates outside the Federal...
Full Image

Google sponsored links
Pres. Obama Ratings - Rate President Obama on His Job Performance. Vote Here Now.
www.newsmax.com/surveys
 
Concealed Carry Guide - Do You Know Your Rights? Get Your Free Concealed Carry Guide Today!
usconcealedcarry.net
 


WASHINGTON (AP) — Internet service providers like Comcast, Verizon, AT&T, Sprint and T-Mobile now must act in the "public interest" when providing a mobile connection to your home or phone, under rules approved Thursday by a divided Federal Communications Commission.
The plan, which puts the Internet in the same regulatory camp as the telephone and bans business practices that are "unjust or unreasonable," represents the biggest regulatory shakeup to the industry in almost two decades. The goal is to prevent providers from slowing or blocking web traffic, or creating paid fast lanes on the Internet, said FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler.
The 3-2 vote was expected to trigger industry lawsuits that could take several years to resolve. Still, consumer advocates cheered the regulations as a victory for smaller Internet-based companies which feared they would have to pay "tolls" to move their content.
Net neutrality is the idea that websites or videos load at about the same speed. That means you won't be more inclined to watch a particular show on Amazon Prime instead of on Netflix because Amazon has struck a deal with your service provider to load its data faster.
(AP) Federal Communication Commission (FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler takes his seat before...
Full Image
Opponents, including many congressional Republicans, said the FCC plan constitutes dangerous government overreach that would eventually drive up consumer costs and discourage industry investment.
Republican FCC Commissioners Mike O'Rielly and Ajit Pai, who voted against the plan, alleged that President Barack Obama unfairly used his influence to push through the regulations, calling the plan a "half-baked, illogical, internally inconsistent and indefensible document."
Michael Powell, a former Republican FCC chairman who now runs the National Cable and Telecommunications Association, warned that consumers would almost immediately "bear the burden of new taxes and increased costs, and they will likely wait longer for faster and more innovative networks since investment will slow in the face of bureaucratic oversight."
Sen. John Thune, R-S.D., chairman of the Senate Commerce Committee, said he would pursue industry-friendly legislation, although it was unlikely that Obama would sign such a bill. The FCC's five commissioners are expected to testify before a Senate panel March 18.
"One way or another, I am committed to moving a legislative solution, preferably bipartisan, to stop monopoly-era phone regulations that harm Internet consumers and innovation," Thune said in a statement this week.
(AP) Federal Communication Commission (FCC) ChairmanTom Wheeler, center, joins hands with...
Full Image
It's not true that consumers would see new taxes right away. The Internet Tax Freedom Act bans taxes on Internet access, although that bill expires in October. While Congress is expected to renew that legislation, it's conceivable that states could eventually push Congress for the ability to tax Internet service now that it has been deemed a vital public utility.
"Read my lips. More Internet taxes are coming. It's just a matter of when," Commissioner Pai said.
For years, providers mostly agreed not to pick winners and losers among Web traffic because they didn't want to encourage regulators to step in and because they said consumers demanded it. But that started to change around 2005, when YouTube came online and Netflix became increasingly popular. On-demand video became known as data hogs, and evidence began to surface that some providers were manipulating traffic without telling consumers.
By 2010, the FCC enacted open Internet rules, but the agency's legal approach was eventually struck down. FCC officials are hoping to erase the legal ambiguity by no longer classifying the Internet as an "information service" but a "telecommunications service" subject to Title II of the 1934 Communications Act.
That would dramatically expand regulators' power over the industry by requiring providers to act in the public's interest and enabling the FCC to fine companies found to be employing "unreasonable" business practices.
The FCC says it won't apply some sections of Title II, including price controls. That means rates charged to customers for Internet access won't be subject to preapproval. But the law allows the government to investigate if consumers complain that costs are unfair.
Also at stake Thursday was Obama's goal of helping local governments build their own fast, cheap broadband. Chattanooga, Tennessee, and Wilson, North Carolina, have filed petitions with the agency to help override state laws that restrict them from expanding their broadband service to neighboring towns.
The FCC approved these petitions, setting a precedent for other communities that might want to do the same.
Nineteen states place restrictions on municipal broadband networks, many with laws encouraged by cable and telephone companies. Advocates of those laws say they are designed to protect taxpayers from municipal projects that are expensive, can fail or may be unnecessary.
---

GEORGIA: AMATEUR DIVERS FIND LONG-LOST NUCLEAR WARHEAD

GEORGIA: AMATEUR DIVERS FIND LONG-LOST NUCLEAR WARHEAD


Feb262015
 
Georgia: Amateur Divers Find Long-Lost Nuclear Warhead
February 12th, 2015

Savannah| A couple of tourists from London Canada made a surprising discovery while scuba diving  in Wassaw Sound, a small bay  located on the shores of Georgia. Jason Sutter and Christina Murray were admiring the marine life of the area when they stumbled upon a Mark 15 thermonuclear bomb that had been lost by the United States Air Force more than 50 years ago.

The couple from London in Ontario, was on a two week vacation in Georgia and Florida to practise their favorite hobby, scuba diving, when they decided to dive near  the shores of Tybee Island. While admiring the plants and fishes near the sea floor, they noticed a large cylindrical item partially covered by sand. They investigated the object and found out that it was actually a sort of bomb or missile, so they decided to contact the authorities.
“I noticed an object that looked like a metal cylinder, which I thought was an oil barrel” says Jason Sutter. “When I dug it up a bit, I noticed that it was actually a lot bigger and that there was some writing on the side. When I saw the inscription saying that it was a Mk-15 nuclear bomb, I totally freaked out. I caught Chritina by the arm and made signs to tell her we had to leave. We made an emergency ascent, went back to shore and then we called 911.”
The couple is still shocked after their frightening discovery and say they will avoid diving for the rest of their trip.
Rapidly understanding the gravity of the situation, the 911 operator contacted every possible emergency service, including the coast guard and the military, leading to the deployment of more than 20 ships and 1500 men in the area. Using the GPS coordinates given by the couple, they rapidly located the powerful 3.8 megaton bomb.
An unmanned submarine was sent to determine the condition of the bomb, before explosive experts were sent to disarm it. Fortunately, the thermonuclear weapon produced in 1955 seemed in sufficiently good shape for a team of Navy seals  to try to defuse it. They successfully deactivated the warhead after hours of strenuous work, allowing the rest of the bomb to be moved.

The delicate recovery operation took more than 48 hours, but the bomb was finally recovered and transported Mayport Naval Station in Florida. A full set of tests and analysis will now be performed on the warhead to evaluate its actual state and the possible ecological and health hazard that its presence in the bay for 50 years could represent.

bomb3
The federal and state authorities were well-aware that a nuclear warhead had been lost in the area in the 1950′s and had never been recovered, but no efforts had been done for years to recover it. It was lost on the night of February 5, 1958, when a B-47 Stratojet bomber carrying the 7,600-pound hydrogen bomb on a  simulated combat mission off the coast of Georgia collided with an F-86 Saberjet fighter at 36,000 feet of altitude. The collision destroyed the fighter and severely damaged a wing of the bomber, leaving one of its engines partially dislodged.

The bomber’s pilot, Maj. Howard Richardson, was instructed by the Homestead Air Force Base in Florida. to jettison the H-bomb before attempting a landing. Richardson dropped the bomb into the shallow waters of Wassaw Sound, near the mouth of the Savannah River, where he believed the bomb would be swiftly recovered.  The crew did not see an explosion when the bomb struck the sea and they managed to land the B-47 safely at the nearest base.

For the following six weeks, the Air Force looked for the bomb without success. Underwater divers scoured the depths, troops tromped through nearby salt marshes, and a blimp hovered over the area attempting to spot a hole or crater in the beach or swamp. Researches were finally abandoned and the bomb remained hidden for more than 50 years until the unlucky couple stumbled upon it.
Source:  http://worldnewsdailyreport.com/georgia-amateur-divers-find-long-lost-nuclear-warhead/

New HAARP experiment findings released by the American Geophysical Union

New post on Dutchsinse

2/26/2015New HAARP experiment findings released by the American Geophysical Union

by Michael Janitch
As we found out last month, all the bogus stories about HAARP closing down were more fake than a politician kissing a baby during election season.
farmer_haarp082907-1a
When I found the 25 million dollar budget from the US Navy for the Fiscal Year of 2015 -- that sealed the deal on whether or not the facility is still in operation.
Today (February 26 2015), I decided to do a search on plasma experiments authorized for FY2015 and FY2016 by the United States Government.
While searching for budgets, I stumbled upon this NEW February 2015 release from the American Geophysical Union regarding new experiments done at HAARP.
Yes, new experiment results from HAARP.  Submitted January 2015.  This means that all the stories about H.A.A.R.P. being closed down in 2014 were false.

Now move forward to 2015, we have the budget for this year from the US Navy, and we have experiment results coming in from 2014 into 2015 - proving the facility did NOT shut down in 2013, and did not shut down in 2014.
 

Abstract

"Experiments involving the generation and detection of artificial periodic inhomogeneities (API) have been performed at the High-frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP) facility.
Irregularities were created using powerful X-mode HF emissions and then probed using short (10μs) X- and O-mode pulses. Reception was performed using a portable software-defined receiver together with the crossed-rhombic antenna from the local ionosonde.
Echoes were observed reliably between about 85-140 km altitude with signal-to-noise ratios as high as about 30 dB. The Doppler shift of the echoes can be associated with the vertical neutral wind in this altitude range.
Small but persistent Doppler shifts were observed. The decay time constant of the echoes is meanwhile indicative of the ambipolar diffusion coefficient which depends on the plasma temperature, composition, and neutral gas density.
The measured time constants appear to be consistent with theoretical expectations and imply a methodology for measuring neutral density profiles.
The significance of thermospheric vertical neutral wind and density measurements which are difficult to obtain using ground-based instruments by other means is discussed."
 
____
  1. This article has been accepted for publication and undergone full peer review but has not been through the copyediting, typesetting, pagination and proofreading process, which may lead to differences between this version and the Version of Record. Please cite this article as doi: 10.1002/2015GL063064

Publication History

  1. Accepted manuscript online: 16 FEB 2015 10:24AM EST
  2. Manuscript Revised: 10 FEB 2015
  3. Manuscript Accepted: 10 FEB 2015
  4. Manuscript Received: 7 JAN 2015
_____
_____
 

MEDIA CORRECTION MUST BE MADE!  HAARP is not closed.

 
Big media outlets made false reports last year saying HAARP was closed -- big names such as livescience, RT, and even NBC news jumping on the false information bandwagon.
After reading these nonsense stories about shutdown , I must point out how the disinformation started.
(Literally this was a made up story in 2013 -- at first saying that HAARP was being closed due to "dirty diesel generators"!  This disinformation was debunked in 2013 by myself.    This happened again in 2014 saying HAARP was being dismantled for parts - both false reports from  a HAARP denier website called the ARRL).
Obviously the ARRL is full of the old stuff, and the people who repeated the false shutdown story now must correct themselves.
 
Unsubscribe to no longer receive posts from Dutchsinse.
Change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.