Tuesday, June 16, 2015

What’s behind Mexico’s military buying binge?


MEXICO CITY--It started with 27 rail cars full of ammunition rolling down the tracks into Mexico.
That load of 30 million bullets was soon followed by fleets of Black Hawk helicopters and thousands of Humvees: in all more than $1 billion of American military equipment sold to Mexico within the past two years.
In a security relationship between Mexico and the United States often described as standoffish, foreign military sales have lately become a big exception. Admiral William E. Gortney, the commander of Northern Command, the U.S. military headquarters that deals with Mexico, testified to Congress earlier this year that Mexico’s buying binge represented a “100-fold increase from prior years.”
What explains the shopping spree?
Americans and Mexicans familiar with the foreign military sales program said that the change in part reflects a revived security partnership between the two countries. It also shows Mexico's aggressive push to modernize its military in the face of powerful drug cartel adversaries.
U.S. officials have hailed the sales in part because they're so rare. Gortney, the Northcom commander, described Mexico's decision to approach the Defense Department about buying military equipment as "unprecedented" and that it marked a "historical milestone" in relations between the two countries.
Mexico's long been suspicious of gringo motives (at least since it lost about half a million square miles of its territory to the U.S. in the 19th century) and has tended to not be a big U.S. military buyer, relying more on European equipment or private commercial agreements. At the start of President Enrique Peña Nieto's term more than two years ago, his administration felt the United States had wormed its way too deeply into the drug war, and Mexico halted many security programs.
"We knew that the President came in really wanting to focus on things other than security," said a U.S. military official who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak publicly. "He found out he really needed to pay a lot of attention to security."
In late 2013, Mexico asked the United States if it could fill a large order of 5.56 mm ammunition, and the embassy helped deliver the trainloads of $6 million worth of bullets within 100 days, the official said.
"That case really kind of broke the ice," he said. "They saw the responsiveness of what we could do as a partner in foreign military sales. And they liked it."
That sale paved the way for even larger purchases: orders for more than two dozen UH-60 Blackhawk helicopters for the Air Force and Navy, and more than 2,200 Humvees. Since Peña Nieto came to office in late 2012, Mexico has purchased about $1.5 billion in equipment through the government's military sales program, plus $2 billion more through U.S. companies, said Inigo Guevara Moyano, a Mexican defense consultant based in Washington.
"All of these buys have been to replace existing systems that averaged 30 to 40 years old and drained budgets through high maintenance costs and poor availability," he said. He noted that defense spending also rose sharply under Peña Nieto's predecessor, Felipe Calderon, and that it reflects the "maturing military-to-military relationship at the institutional level, regardless of who is in power."
The buying also is a sign of the intensity of the war against the drug cartels. The Mexican military has aggressive operations ongoing in several states such as Tamaulipas, on the Texas border, and Jalisco, against the ascendant New Generation drug cartel. These operations have driven a rapid increase in defense spending over much of the past decade. Since 2006, spending has tripled, from $2.6 billion to $7.9 billion this year. Despite the growth, Mexico spends less than many other countries in the hemisphere, just .51 percent of gross domestic product, compared to a Latin American average of 1.31 percent, Guevara said.
In addition to tactical raids and statewide operations against drug cartels, the Mexican military is involved in all sorts of other missions, from vaccination programs, to reforestation, to securing voting booths in volatile parts of the country, as it did last week. The lavishly funded drug cartels it fights are sometimes better armed and equipped than the security forces. Cartel gunmen recently shot down a Mexican military helicopter with a rocket-propelled grenade.
"The Mexican armed forces, including the Army, is one of the most overtasked military forces in the world," said Alejandro Hope, a security analyst.
Some have been critical of the U.S. sales, particularly in a climate where Mexican security forces have regularly been accused of human rights violations. Last year, 43 teachers college students disappeared in Guerrero, allegedly captured and killed by local police working with drug gangs. A few months earlier, 22 civilians were killed by the Mexican military in the town of Tlatlaya south of Mexico City. The army first described the incident as a firefight but later admitted that a number of the civilians had been executed after surrendering. Relatives of the 42 men killed last month on a Michoacan ranch have accused the authorities of torturing and executing them, claims the government denies.
Researcher John Lindsay-Poland wrote for the North American Congress on Latin America (NACLA) that the “massive militarization” is “bad news for the many Mexicans devastated by the abuses of police and soldiers.”
“The United States must develop other capacities besides producing guns and military equipment for finding a healthy balance of trade and addressing our own problems,” he wrote.
But others see this as necessary maintenance and modernization for an under-equipped military.
"It's mainly a process of correcting the imbalance," Hope said. "Having Humvees will not affect how much respect they have for human rights."

Emergency Report: 2nd TPP Sneak Attack Coming Tomorrow, this Tuesday! JUNE 16, 2015


>>>>Emergency Report: <<<<

2nd TPP Sneak Attack Coming Tomorrow,

this Tuesday!>>> JUNE 16, 2015<<<
 
****************************************
 
FKTV links can be accessed via the following 
social media accts:
 
 
 
**************************************** 
 
There's a reason for why this is being 
hidden from the public.
 
Congress is going to do a sneak vote 
on the TPP tomorrow, on Tuesday
 
According to Senator Jeff Sessions 
(R-AL), there is an upcoming vote 
tomorrow for a bill called the TAA. 
 
Hidden inside the TAA is a provision 
that would allow the President to 
fast-track authority on any and all 
trade agreements, for a period of 6 
years.
 
This would inherently include the TPP, 
TTIP and TISA.
 
The next US President would inherit
the power of these treaties, to consolidate 
corporate sovereignty and to dismantle 
what little is left of national sovereignty.
 
These corrupt "leaders" are hoping you 
aren't paying attention. 
 
PROVE THEM WRONG.
 
Dial 1-201-TPP-LIES (201-877-5437
to  talk to your reps, NOW!
 
For more information, go HERE.
 
 
Video: (2 minutes): 
 

P.S. Please share ForbiddenKnowledgeTV  emails 
and videos with your friends and colleagues on Twitter, too.
 
That's how we grow. Thanks.

Alexandra Bruce, Publisher
ForbiddenKnowledgeTV.com
Daily Videos from the Edges of Science

Monday, June 15, 2015

Soap bubbles turn in to stunning ice crystals!



SOAP BUBBLES BLOWN IN FREEZING TEMPERATURES TURN IN TO STUNNING ICE CRYSTALS!!!!!

Incredible!  WOW!
 
Soap bubbles blown in freezing temperatures turn into stunning ice crystals.
Hope Thurston Carter captured the images after blowing bubbles on several freezing days in Michigan.
Temperatures between -9 and -12C are ideal for creating the ice bubbles. 
In the midst of one of the most severe winters in modern American history, the 52-year-old, of Martin, Michigan, got the idea after seeing similar pictures on the Internet.
'I was instantly curious and ran out and bought some bubble solution so I could try this myself,' she told HotSpot Media.
'I found out very quickly that blowing bubbles in the winter and trying to photograph them is not as simple and easy as it looks!'
Still weather with temperatures between -9 and -12 degrees Celsius is ideal for creating the ice bubbles.
On such a day, Hope ventures into her back garden with a bottle of bubble mixture, blows a flurry and, when one lands intact,  runs to her camera to photograph it as crystals spread.
 
Nature's colours:                                                Golden sunlight makes this                                                frozen soap bubble look                                                like a priceless artefact
Nature's colours: Golden sunlight makes this frozen soap bubble look like a priceless artifact
Shapes: The                                                  incredible patterns in                                                  the bubbles form as ice                                                  crystals spread across                                                  their surfaces
Shapes: The incredible patterns in the bubbles form as ice crystals spread across their surfaces
Reflections: This                                                  remarkable ice bubble                                                  looks like a frozen                                                  planet hanging in                                                  starless space
Reflections: This remarkable ice bubble looks like a frozen planet hanging in starless space
Inner glow: A                                                    mysterious-looking red                                                    light shines from                                                    within this bubble of                                                    frozen soapy water
Inner glow: A mysterious-looking red light shines from within this bubble of frozen soapy water
Golden: The play of                                                the light through the                                                frozen bubbles is one of                                                the most interesting                                                aspects of the shots
Golden: The play of the light through the frozen bubbles is one of the most interesting aspects of the shots
Inner world: Hope                                                Thurston Carter captured                                                the images after blowing                                                bubbles on freezing days                                                in Michigan
Weather conditions:                                                Still weather with                                                temperatures between -9C                                                and -12C is ideal for                                                creating the bubbles
Patience: That's the                                                key virtue needed when                                                doing this kind of a                                                project, Mrs Thurston                                                Carter says
Beautiful: 'I am so                                              thankful and appreciative of                                              the fact that I have been                                              able to do this,' she said 


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2955640/How-create-snow-globe-Soap-bubbles-blown-freezing-temperatures-turn-stunning-ice-crystals.html

https://www.facebook.com/hope.t.carter

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=JXb4r1rPw5s



Urgent! This Is Your Official Warning!

Urgent! This Is Your Official Warning! Why You Should be Concerned…


Monday, June 15, 2015 12:15 
 
ISIS is beginning to spread their fear tactics once again but this time they are threatening with dirty bombs and weapons of mass destruction. Their goal is to kill as many infidels as possible. To kill anyone and everyone who is opposed to their false god, “Allah.”
 
According to a 26 page Fatwa manifesto written by Nasr Al-Fahd, a Saudi theologian, they target and desire the complete annihilation of the United States killing as many as they can. Here are just a few of the quotes found in this disturbing manifesto:
 
“Peace, mercy and blessings of God. It is no secret what was published in the media about the intention to hit America with weapons of mass Destruction. So what is the Fatwa ruling for the Mujahideen to use these? Is it permissible at all? Is it the Mother of necessity? … This issue, needs a complete message; and gathering from evidence and scholarly sources to the question regarding The House of War and how to practice Jihad-u-Dafi’ (Repulse Jihad) and the meaning of destruction of crops including reproduction of life (children) religiously, and so on which I will collect what was given by Allah’s will”. (Page 2)
 
“If the infidels cannot be repulsed from the Muslims except by resorting to using such weapons, then it may be used even if it killed and wiped them out completely including decimating their crops and their descendants. I will include the details in my letter I mentioned. Therefore the question is asked and the answer is given and the matter is closed and concluded. (see Page #2)”
 
“Ibn Rajab said regarding Allah’s mercy in his collection on science and governance, p 112: “in charity it is permissible to kill people and animals in the easiest way and do not increase in the torture and the easiest method to kill a human being is to strike off the neck with the sword of violence in accordance to the Quran when “you meet the unbelievers then strike off their necks”(Quran) “فإذالقيتمالذينكفروافضربالرقاب” and it also said: “I will spread horror/terror in the hearts of the unbelievers, smite above their necks and smite there fingertips thereof” (see Page 5)
 
“Section I: evidence for an age to use specific weapons for a particular enemy:
And so like if America at this time; the issue to hit with these weapons [mass destruction] is permissible without mentioning the evidence of the second section the following (evidence of general legality); because Allah Almighty says “to punish in similar fashion as you were afflicted”, and the Almighty says “Attack who attacks you in similar ways as you were attacked,” and the Almighty says “Pay evil with evil,” so the observer sees American aggression on Muslims and their lands during the past decades concludes the permission to use aggression with reciprocity only as has been collected by some of the brothers the number of dead from amongst the Muslims with their weapons of direct and indirect, methods to bring the number close to ten million. And as for the lands that [America] burned with their bombs and their explosives and rockets not one can enumerate except Allah, and whatever else happened in Afghanistan and Iraq, and this is what caused the wars on many of the Muslims causing homelessness. So if bomb is launched at them that will kill ten million of them, and it will burn their land as much as they burned the Muslim lands this is therefore permissible without the need to mention any other evidence, but other evidence may be needed if we are to perish of them more than this number!” (Page 8)
 
As you can tell from above they intend to kill around ten million of us, be it through weapons of mass destruction or any other means necessary…  
 


(NOTE- Yes I know they use ISIS to install fear, but we must remember who they work for, the CIA, our government, which means they mean business. If these creeps gets nukes–they may be allowed to use them and given the green light! It’s a serious threat nonetheless….And from who and how do you suppose they WILL OBTAIN THOSE NUKES?  FROM OUR USA CORPORATE 'GOVERNMENT' OF COURSE - MOST LIKELY THEY HAVE THEM RIGHT NOW.) 
 
The video you are about to see below is jam packed full of things that will literally drive you to tears and likely propel you into full blown revolution mode. The things being allowed are beyond comprehension and we can no longer sit back and allow this tyranny and ISIS to continue, we must wake-up, take a stand, and make our voices heard….
 

 
The Islamic religion is the world’s fastest growing religion, and according to the most recent Pew report on Muslim demographics; there are approximately 1.6 billion Muslims worldwide, which means 24% of the world’s population practice Islam (that’s about one out of every four people on this planet!!).
 
Now to be fair, about 80% of them are not radicals and they don’t believe in killing Jews and Christians. They are considered a peaceful people. However, the other 20% of them are radical enough to strap a bomb on their body in order to kill anyone who opposes their belief.
 
That means about 300 million Muslims are willing to die in order to take you and me down. Now it is safe to say that a vast majority of Muslims are peaceful people; HOWEVER the question is, is Islam itself a peaceful religion? And will these ‘peaceful’ Muslims eventually swing the other way? Well now that is the question! But in order to find our answer, lets first look at the meaning of 'Jihad'.
 
One meaning is that the word Jihad signifies a battle between man versus himself. Basically it means standing against those carnal sinful desires. However the other definition is the belief of using violence in order to accomplish the 'will' of Allah by punishing infidels in order to expand the kingdom of their god, Allah (that is what fundamentalist believe).
 
To further find our answer, let’s look to the very book they use to grab their doctrine from, the Koran….
 
Sura 5:51, “O you who believe, do not take certain Jews and Christians as allies…GOD does not guide the transgressors.”
 
Sura 5:33, “{Jews & Christians} are the ones whom God has cursed, and he whom God excludes from His mercy, you shall never find one to help and save him.”
 
Sura 9:5, “Kill the infidels, [Christians & Jews] wherever you may come upon them and seize them and confine them, and lie in wait for them at every conceivable place.”
 
Sura 9:12, “Fight with the leaders of unbelief.”
 
Sura 47:4, “When you meet those who disbelieve (in war), smite them at their necks.”
 
According to the verses in their book, the Koran, Islamic fundamentalists believe in: fighting and killing infidels [or all who do not believe in Islam]. They are taught to hate Jews, Christians or anyone who opposes Allah. They are taught that Jews and Christians are cursed and should not be taken as friends but rather should be murdered and smite at the necks.
 
Islam at its core teaches its believers to seek conversion at any cost. Whether that’s through persuasion, sword, peace, or force; it doesn’t matter as long as they are converted. Christianity, on the other hand, seeks conversion by persuasion, it’s their choice if they want to accept it. It is never forced on them.
 
Now that we have covered that, lets chew on this for a moment. Did you know that there is not a single 1 out of all 55 predominately Muslim Nations that do not persecute Christians? Christians are persecuted in all 55 predominately Muslim nations. If Islam is so peaceful, then why is this the case? The reality of it is one day Jews and Christians will be persecuted for their faith.
 
Islam is not only a problem abroad but it has also invaded our country. Currently 1,764 Islamic centers exist in the US. and it is believed that 400-500 of them teach radical Islam—teaching that America in the enemy. Furthermore there are over 35 terrorist training camps in America, in which they preach violence against all who are not Islamic and promote Sharia Law.
 


For More Information See: 
http://allenbwest.com/2015/06/why-our-troops-need-to-be-very-concerned-on-june-29th/
http://woundedamericanwarrior.com/islamic-state-video-show-its-fighters-using-american-made-anti-tank-missile-against-syrian-troops-video/
http://www.newschannel10.com/story/28603897/isis-releases-kill-list-seven-texas-cities-included#.VXpKOS9YsPM.facebook
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/robert-jeffress-christians-persecution-holocaust

Bullies try to derail local control of public lands

REMEMBER THE ILLEGAL HARRY REID & FED PUSH AGAINST CLEVEN BUNDY IN NEVADA?
KEEP A CLOSE 'EYE' ON WHAT IS HAPPENING IN YOUR STATE CONCERNING THE LAND, WATER, ETC. AS THE COMMIE PUSH IS ON HARD TO STEAL YOUR LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES ....... SEE UPDATE BELOW
 
Bullies try to derail local
 control of public lands


By Montana State Senator Jennifer Fielder
June 15, 2015

Over the past 3 years, the idea of transferring federally managed public lands to the states has swelled from a small town dream to a full-fledged national movement. As grass roots support grows, organized opposition bolsters their attempts to distort the truth and dirty the reputations of good, honest people.


For example, opponents have repeatedly told everyone that if Montanans were in charge of our own lands and resources, we would sell them all off. Well, I think that kind of criticism is selling Montanans short.
Whether it is work, play, or the scenic beauty of our rolling prairies, majestic mountains, or clear blue waters, Montana’s public lands are special to all of us. There’s no need to sell public lands to make money because wise stewardship of natural resources can produce more than enough revenue to cover land management costs while enhancing the environment and providing world class outdoor recreation.


Early this year, I introduced SB215, a simple bill that would prohibit the sale of any federal land that may be transferred to the state in the future. Guess who opposed the law that would keep public lands public? It was the same left leaning organizations who are telling everyone we would sell it! Specifically, paid lobbyists representing Montana Wilderness Association, Montana Wildlife Federation, and Montana Audubon Society came into our State Capitol and testified against SB215. So did democrat Governor Bullock’s administration.


Amazingly, just one week later, the same groups held a “keep it public” rally in the State Capitol. They came up with a lot of money from somewhere to bus hundreds of people in from all over Montana and feed them free lunch to go with the line of “bull” they served up over the megaphone


A few weeks later the Montana Democrat party piled on with a bogus fund raising letter falsely stating that my bill, SB 215, was a bill to “sell Montana’s public lands”. In actuality, SB215 reads: “An act prohibiting future sales of land granted or transferred to the state”. You can verify what I am reporting here by reviewing the official public record at http://leg.mt.gov and search the LAWS data base for SB215. I welcome you to read the bill and watch the video of the hearing to see who really testified in favor of keeping public lands public and who opposed it. 


Governor Steve Bullock recently held an expensive statewide “telephone town hall”, apparently funded by the Wilderness Association to perpetuate blatant untruths about the transfer of public lands movement.


The latest whopper came about two weeks ago from a mysterious new, self-proclaimed “watchdog” group which is run by high level democrat political strategists in Washington DC. In spite of the fact that transfer of public lands to the states has already been done before, they claim it is “fraudulent” to talk about it! That, my friends, is a desperate attempt to shut down debate, suppress free speech, and stifle our success.
 
Despite the organized opposition’s outrageous rhetoric and relentless attacks, the grass roots movement for local control has been so successful that seventeen States and the U.S. Congress have now initiated legislation in favor of turning federal lands over to willing states. Fifty western counties and numerous organizations have issued official statements of support. Many have donated time and resources to the effort and more are joining every day.


Obviously the idea of thoughtful, accountable, locally driven stewardship of our public lands makes sense to a growing number of people. Many of us realize Montanans would make wiser choices for our lands than distant decision makers in Washington DC. We could become a more self-reliant state with better public access, environmental health, and economic productivity on our public lands. And that seems to scare some very powerful, very wealthy bullies who prefer federal control of Montana. I won’t be bullied.


You can get more facts about the transfer of public lands at www.AmericanLandsCouncil.org 








NAFTA and Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP)

 


Rogers Introduces Bill to Get U.S. Out of UN

Ala/R Congressman Mike Rogers Introduces Bill to Get U.S. Out of UN

  
(Alex Newman)  Citing wasted tax dollars and attacks on the constitutionally guaranteed liberties of the American people, Rep. Mike Rogers (R-Ala.; shown) introduced a bill to restore U.S. sovereignty and withdraw from the United Nations. The effort to de-fund and exit the UN comes amid growing scrutiny of the global organization, often ridiculed as the “dictators club,” and myriad mega-scandals swirling around it. However, despite ever-growing support in Congress for restoring U.S. sovereignty by withdrawing from the UN over the years, the legislation still faces an uphill battle.


In a statement last week announcing the American Sovereignty Restoration Act of 2015 (H.R. 1205), Rep. Rogers noted that many of his constituents in East Alabama would likely agree with his position that U.S. government participation in the UN should end immediately. “The U.N. continues to prove it’s an inefficient bureaucracy and a complete waste of American tax dollars,” the congressman said, echoing widespread concerns about the international outfit expressed across America and worldwide.


Why should the American taxpayer bankroll an international organization that works against America’s interests around the world?” asked Rep. Rogers. “The time is now to restore and protect American sovereignty and get out of the United Nations.” He cited attacks on U.S. liberties as a key motivation for the legislation.


un


Several other liberty-minded congressmen have also sponsored the legislation including constitutionalist Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), Rep. John Duncan (R-Tenn.), Rep. Lynn Westmoreland (R-Ga.), and Rep. Tim Huelskamp (R-Kan.). A previous bill to withdraw from the UN introduced in the last Congress by then-Rep. Paul Broun (R-Ga.) garnered nine co-sponsors. With the regime ruling Communist China increasingly taking a leading role at the UN, among numerous other concerns, opposition to the global body is expected to continue growing.


If approved, the legislation would repeal the UN Participation Act of 1945 and shutter the U.S. government’s mission to the outfit. It would also “terminate all membership by the United States in the United Nations, and in any organ, specialized agency, commission, or other formally affiliated body of the United Nations.” That specifically includes UNESCO, which President Ronald Reagan withdrew from, along with the World Health Organization, the UN Environment Program (UNEP), and more. It would end all U.S. involvement in all UN conventions and agreements, too.


The proposed law, introduced in numerous legislative session of Congress in recent decades, would also end all funding to the UN and all of its agencies — with the estimated savings to taxpayers reaching into the billions per year, and potentially even more. The legislation also aims to end all U.S. military involvement in UN military “peacekeeping” schemes and ban U.S. troops from serving under UN command. Finally, the bill would seek to evict the UN and its dictator-infested headquarters from U.S. soil. It would also ban any use of American government facilities by the global outfit, while stripping UN bureaucrats and dignitaries of diplomatic immunity.


Rep. Rogers pointed to a wide range of reasons why the U.S. should dump the UN. “Although the United States makes up almost a quarter of the U.N.’s annual budget, the U.N. has attempted a number of actions that attack our rights as U.S. citizens,” he explained. “To name a few, these initiatives include actions like the Law of the Sea Treaty, which would subject our country to internationally-based environmental mandates, costing American businesses more money, or the U.N.’s work to re-establish an international regulation regime on global warming which would heavily target our fossil fuels.”


Indeed, especially in recent years, the UN has become increasingly brazen in attacking the rights of Americans, and even the U.S. Constitution that enshrines those unalienable rights. From attacks on free speech and gun rights to assaults on America’s federalist system of government and states’ rights, the UN and its member regimes have become increasingly aggressive. Now, the UN is working on a series of major schemes that would undermine even the principles upon which the United States was founded, much of it under the guise of promoting pseudo-human rights and pseudo-environmentalism.


Rep. Rogers took special aim at a UN gun treaty that has become a lightning rod for bipartisan opposition across America. “The U.N. has also offered a potential Arms Trade Treaty which would threaten our Second Amendment rights and impose regulations on our gun manufacturers, who are already facing regulations and pressure from the Obama Administration,” Rogers explained. That treaty, ATT for short, would purport to require gun registration and eventually strict controls, with the ultimate aim of disarming civilians.


The UN’s perceived anti-Israel bias, which some critics have even dubbed systemic anti-Semitism, also attracted criticism from Rep. Rogers. “Lastly, the U.N. does not support Israel and voted to grant the Palestinian Authority ‘non-member state’ permanent observer status,” he argued. “Anyone who is not a friend to our ally Israel, is not a friend to the United States.” Even some globalist neo-con senators such as Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) have threatened the UN over its apparent hostility to Israel, and the outrage continues to grow.


For the reasons cited above, “among others,” Rep. Rogers said, he introduced the American Sovereignty Restoration Act. By introducing the bill in this session, the congressman from Alabama continues the long and valiant effort by lawmakers to get the U.S. government out of the UN. Former Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas), a GOP presidential candidate last election and a hero of many liberty-minded and constitutionalist Americans, first introduced the bill in 1997, when it garnered 54 supporters. The next time it was voted on, support had drastically increased.


While anti-UN sentiment is fierce and growing across much of America, in Alabama, where the legislation’s lead sponsor comes from, that animosity is especially pronounced. In 2012, for example, both houses of the state legislature voted unanimously to ban the deeply controversial UN “sustainable development” program known as Agenda 21 in what was hailed as a major victory for property rights and sovereignty. Since then, UN meddling in American affairs has accelerated dramatically, sparking even more outrage about the global organization across Alabama and beyond.


In the U.S. Senate, pro-sovereignty sentiment is also growing. Earlier this year, Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), a leading contender for the 2016 nomination, blasted the UN and suggested it should be dismantled. “I dislike paying for something that two-bit Third World countries with no freedom attack us and complain about the United States,” explained the senator, who is also Ron Paul’s son. “There’s a lot of reasons why I don’t like the UN, and I think I’d be happy to dissolve it.”


The American public generally shares those sentiments, with a 2014 Gallup poll showing that a staggering 57 percent of Americans believed the UN was doing a “bad job,” versus 37 percent who thought it was doing a “good job.” More than two thirds of Americans were upset with the UN, and independents were also overwhelmingly opposed. But even among Democrats, half thought the UN was doing a bad job. The Obama administration, meanwhile, apparently out of step with the American people, has called for drastically expanding and empowering the UN and its scandal-plagued military forces.


The legislation to withdraw U.S. participation in the UN is currently sitting in the House Foreign Affairs Committee chaired by Rep. Edward “Ed” Royce (R-Calif.), who will play a key role in deciding whether it moves on to the full House for a vote by the American people’s elected representatives. Americans who support U.S. sovereignty and the U.S. Constitution should urge their representatives to take action.


As efforts to fully restore U.S. sovereignty proceed, though, the Republican Congress should completely de-fund the UN in the meantime. Without action, the increasingly powerful and lawless UN will continue seeking to further empower itself at American expense — trampling on liberty and sovereignty in the process.


http://govtslaves.info/congressman-mike-rogers-introduces-bill-to-get-u-s-out-of-un/



The Most Reliable Semi-Automatic Rifle You Can Buy?

The Most Reliable Semi-Automatic Rifle You Can Buy?

Image source: wikimedia
Image source: wikimedia
I remember the day I first saw her. There I was in a large crowd amongst merchants peddling me the latest and greatest inventions and innovations, and that’s when I saw her. She was rather plain, almost homely in appearance, but I had fallen head over heels. And I left that day with her in my arms. Truth be told, I had arrived at the gun show in pursuit of a Colt AR-15, and left with my Ugly Duckling. A Romanian parts kit built AK-47.
Since that day, almost 10 years ago, I have never stopped using the AK platform rifle. I have fired thousands upon thousands of rounds, purposely tortured rifles, and compared them to just about everything else on the market. There is no other long arm I would ever want to carry during the apocalypse.
After thousands of rounds, none of my AK platform rifles have suffered a failure to feed, jam or even a misfire. That just doesn’t happen with an AR-15. Yes, accuracy is in the hands of an AR platform firearm, but reliability goes to the AK. To be honest, accuracy is not bad at all. It is not nearly the “Communist Blunderbuss” that many shooters crack it up to be. I can easily achieve 1-3 inch groups at 100 yards, and 3-4 inches at 200 yards. Perfectly able to bring down deer-sized game.
When I first joined the ranks of AK owners, there were not all that many of us compared to AR-15 and M1A owners. I would show up at the shooting range and when I pulled out my AK I would receive some very curious looks.
In the 1990s, and early 2000s, almost every AK platform rifle was an import. The most common rifles at this time by far were the Norinco and Polytech rifles that were produced in Communist China. As opposed to just about everything else made in China, they were extremely well-built with 1.5mm receivers, chrome-lined barrels, and excellent workmanship. Other common rifles were several different models of Romanian AKs — the most popular by far being the WASR 10 – and there were a few Egyptian MAADIs. There were other European imports, too. One thing for sure: There was no such thing as an American-made AK. That, though, has changed.
Made in ‘Merica
Arsenal in Las Vegas, Nevada, was really just about the first truly American-made AK. Arsenal both imported rifles and built new production rifles at their new state-of-the-art facility. Quality was and still is extremely high. Most other American AK producers purchased de-milled former Communist weapons in parts kits and reassembled them in semi-automatic-only variants for US civilian use. For many years the quality of these thrown-together parts guns was either really great, or criminally horrible.
Ultimate Tactical Self-Defense And Hunting Weapon That Doesn’t Require A Firearms License!
Not so with Arsenal. Every AK that rolls off their line was and is new production. Cold hammer forged chrome lined barrels are standard, as are properly riveted receivers and aligned sights. Rifles are offered with either a stamped receiver, or forged receiver (whatever floats your boat). Chamberings include the venerable 7.62x39mm, the 5.45x39mm, and the US 5.56x45mm. With Arsenal you will pay around $1,000, or slightly north thereof, but you will have a rifle that your great grandson will pass down.
AK-47Century Arms, for many years, was the company that produced guns that were ugly and cheap, but that never seemed to die. It became a well-known fact that Century took the cheap way around things and installed barrels chambered in 5.56x45mm on a rifle chambered for the Russian 5.45x39mm. The results were bad. Very bad. Combine that with horrible customer service and warranty, and Century Arms rightly incurred the wrath of many AK shooters around the nation.
I think Century Arms took a hint starting around 2012, because all of a sudden they stopped producing junk. Century overhauled their company and started keeping a close eye on quality, and the firearms community noticed.
The first change was to their famous WASR 10 — famous for being functional, and looking as if a preschool class had built it. Suddenly a rifle known for shoddy workmanship started to have decent stocks, proper riveting, properly widened magwell, and no more canted sights. The quality of the new WASR 10, especially after 2012, is simply outstanding. The rifle has a stamped receiver, and a hammer-forged chrome lined barrel. The price is great too: around $550. The price and quality now make it a great and affordable AK, and one that enables someone to get into the platform quickly.
Now the WASR 10 is mostly built overseas and finished here in the states, so we can’t fully count that as an American AK. However, it does go to show the reader the improvement of Century at their base line rifle. Two new models made by Century are the RAS47 and C39 V2. Both rifles are fully built in the US. Both feature excellent nitrited barrels which will last just as long as a chrome lined barrel (anyone who says otherwise doesn’t know what they are talking about). Both rifles are built well to high standards. The RAS47 has a stamped receiver, and the C 39, a forged. You’ll pay around $640 for the RAS47 and $700 for the C39.
IO Inc. was another company with a horrible reputation. At first, IO started out with a promising future. Based originally in North Carolina, they were one of the first companies to start producing a 100 percent US-made AKM. However, starting around 2010, they went downhill very quickly. After much research, it was soon learned the problems arose from the employees of the company. Horrible customer service, manufacturing and other problem almost shut that company down.
My Personal Defender: Low Cost Way To Defend Yourself Against Lowlife Criminal Scum!
To be honest, had I owned IO, I would have thrown in the towel. Uli Wiegand, the owner of IO, did not do that. To his credit, he stuck it out. He closed up shop completely in North Carolina and moved all of his equipment to a new manufacturing facility on Florida’s space coast. IO hired all new staff and trained them before opening back up in 2013.
Today, the products offered by IO are very well built. I was quite shocked when I saw their new AKS. Nitrited Barrels, all American parts, and plenty of options have really made this rifle a great addition to the American AK family. Reliability is excellent, and so is accuracy. These are some of the most accurate AKs I have seen at their price point. And just what is their price point? Around $500 to $550 for a M247 model in either synthetic or wood stock.
DDI happens to be one of my favorites right now. Based out of Knoxville, Tennessee, this is a fairly new company. DDI has taken some pretty nifty technological leaps ahead of the other companies out there. This is seen with their use of a fenocite barrel. Just what on earth is fenocite, you ask? Well to put it simply, it is a chemical and gas process that hardens the steel to around 70 on the Rockwell scale of hardness. It is just as hard as chrome, and believed to last 1/3 longer.  Time will tell. But the rifles built by DDI are beautiful, reliable and reasonable priced. I would almost say they have the same quality as a higher priced Arsenal. You, too, can put a DDI AK in your gun safe for around $700.
The Future
Well, if God in his mercy grants us a wee bit more time before hard times come, there are other AKs about to be American made. Because of the Obama Administrations’ embargo against all Russian firearms, many AK producers are now forced to look to our shores for production. The Russian Weapons Company is about to start production of Russian pattern AKs in the US. Palmetto State Armory, which for years has built quality AR-15 and AR-10 platform rifles, has now joined the AK-producing world. Their firearms are of high quality, and I trust Palmetto State. A Palmetto AK sells for around $650-750.
In closing, if you are looking for a semi-automatic sporting rifle (if you call these assault rifles, I will reach through my computer screen and slap you!) to add to your preps or gun safe, you should consider one of these AKs. You will have a reliable platform that you can count on to function in the worst conditions, and a rifle that can supply meat to your table and security for your loved ones should ever the need arise.

Obama Tries to Bully the Supreme Court



 OBAMA TRIES TO BULLY THE SUPREME COURT          
              
     



Written by 
Saturday, 13 June 2015


The U.S. Supreme Court is expected to hand down a ruling later this month that could have devastating consequences for Obamacare. The badly misnamed Affordable Care Act (??!!), which established Obamacare, states very clearly that federal subsidies for health insurance would be offered only to people who signed up through state exchanges.


But when 37 states refused to establish state exchanges for the federally mandated health insurance, the federal 'government' agreed to provide subsidies to people who got their coverage through the federal exchange. As a result, an estimated 6 million people are getting federal subsidies who otherwise would not qualify for them.


This is the basis of King vs. Burwell, the lawsuit now before the Supreme Court. At a news conference on Monday, Obama displayed an interesting bit of bravado when he declared, “There is no reason why the existing exchanges should be overturned through a court case.” Why, of course there is, Mr. 'President'. It’s called obeying what the law says, not what you wish it said.


Trying to sound more optimistic than he probably is, the 'president' went on to say, “This should be an easy case.” In fact, he added, “It probably shouldn’t even have been taken up,” by the court.


Hmmm..........telling the nine justices on the Supreme Court that they shouldn’t even have agreed to hear the case in the first place probably isn’t the best way to get them on your side. But Obama said he is so optimistic that the Supreme Court will rule in his favor that his administration hasn’t even discussed a back-up plan in case the court rules against the policy. Besides, he added, “Congress could fix this whole thing with a one-sentence provision.”


Of course, that is not going to happen. Sen. John Barrasso (R-Wy.), who is the chairman of the Republican Policy Committee, said: “Let’s be clear: If the Supreme Court rules against the administration, Congress will not pass a so-called ‘one-sentence’ fake fix.” And he added, “Instead of bullying the Supreme Court, the 'president' should spend his time preparing for the reality that the court may soon rule against his decision to illegally issue tax penalties and subsidies on Americans in two-thirds of the country.”


We’ll know by the end of this month how the Supreme Court will rule. But remember, this is the same Court that said Obamacare was constitutional because it is a tax ??!!) — despite the fact that Obama was adamant it was not. This wouldn’t be the first time the court turned logic and plain language upside down in one of its rulings.


Still, I suspect the 'president’s' bravado is because his advisers have warned him that the court is likely to rule against him. Otherwise, why would he try to browbeat the court before it issues its ruling, with comments like this one:

I think it’s important for us to go ahead and assume that the Supreme Court is going to do what most legal scholars who’ve looked at this would expect them to do.

Sounds like somebody whistling past a graveyard, doesn’t it? If Obama were really confident that the Supreme Court will rule in favor of the federal subsidies, he’d skip the smug comments and just smile for the cameras.


Of course, this wouldn’t be the first time that the president played fast and loose with the truth. Shame on us if we’d expect anything else from him.


Until next time, keep some powder dry.


http://www.thenewamerican.com/reviews/opinion/item/21060-obama-tries-to-bully-the-supreme-court