GOP Lawmakers Make Massive Move to Confiscate Guns

BOOM! GOP LAWMAKERS MAKE MASSIVE MOVE TO CONFISCATE GUNS ....... FROM OBAMA!!!!! WELL IT'S ABOUT TIME!!!!


A group of House Republicans have introduced legislation designed at de-militarizing certain federal agencies that have developed law enforcement teams over the years.

The 'Homeland Security Act of 2002' (IN-SECURITY NAZI AGENCY FOR THE CORPORATE U.S.A. CRIMINAL CABAL) gave many federal organizations the ability to establish their own police-like divisions over the years to carry out raids, and this has many GOP lawmakers thinking the act went too far, according to the Washington Examiner. (NO KIDDING!  HOW ABOUT THE ORGANIC CONSTITUTION, THE BILL OF RIGHTS, AND STATES RIGHTS? NOT TO MENTION THE SOVEREIGN CITIZEN'S GOD GIVEN RIGHTS.)

Offices like the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the Food and Drug Administration have established teams that could conduct their own raids and arrests. (How about the illegal IRS? The Forest Service and US Post office and a number of other corporations under the U.S.A. mafia?)

On Wednesday, Rep. Chris Stewart of Utah said: “I understand that federal agents must be capable of protecting themselves, but what we have observed goes far beyond providing necessary protection.”  “When there are genuinely dangerous situations involving federal law, that’s the job of the Department of (UN/IN) Justice, not regulatory agencies like the FDA or the Department of Education,” he added.

Stewart pointed to an incident in 2010 when the FDA conducted an armed raid against a grocery store accused of selling raw milk. (Absolutely anti-American and totally insane and blatantly STUPID. The entire world consumed RAW MILK from the creation of this planet up to the pharmaceutical, drug and agricultural corporations of the U.S.A. mafia corporation in Wash DC decided they know more than God Almighty Himself about the cows HE CREATED.)  Stewart also said the Department of Education and the Bureau of Land Management have organized similar armed raids.  (The Bundys and other land owners, farmers and cattlemen have had ENOUGH of the BLM's unlawful BS.  Their events are bringing this nation to the cliff on civil war.)

“Not only is it overkill, but having these highly armed units within dozens of agencies is duplicative, costly, heavy handed, dangerous and destroys any sense of trust between citizens and the federal government,” he said.

Stewart's proposed legislation, the Regulatory Agency De-militarization Act, would repeal the authorization for these types of agencies to arrest individuals. It would also take away their ability to purchase and own firearms. (ALL military equipment and hardware should be immediately confiscated from these rogue unlawful U.S.A. criminal cabal corporations. These corporations are operating just like Hamas and ISIS - they are TERRORISTS on united States soil to the point of their next step being beheading.)

The bill would furthermore require reports detailing every agency that receives military training.

This legislation is sure to upset 'president' Barack Obama and his administration, which likes the idea of government having guns, but not the people.

CONTACT ALL CABAL 'GOVERNMENT' REPS AND SENATORS - GIVE THEM HELL - TELL THEM IN NO UNCERTAIN TERMS YOU HAVE HAD ENOUGH - INSTRUCT THEM TO AGREE TO AND PASS THIS LEGISLATION AND TO MAKE SURE OBAMA AND HIS HANDLERS KNOW THE PEOPLE'S WILL IS TO BE DONE - NOT THEIRS.  THEY ARE NOT YOUR TRUE GOVERNMENT BUT A CORPORATION. THEY HAVE NO AUTHORITY OVER THE PEOPLE.  BY THE SAME TOKEN, EACH STATE NEEDS TO DISSOLVE ITS CORPORATE STATE CHARTER AND RETURN TO ITS SOVEREIGN REPUBLIC GOVERNMENT OPERATING UNDER COMMON LAW.  IT IS TIME FOR THE REPUBLIC TO RISE AGAIN. GET INVOLVED AND MAKE THE REPUBLIC HAPPEN - FOR PETE SAKE.  EVERY COUNTY NEEDS TO FORM ITS PEOPLES' COMMITTEES TO ELECT OFFICERS FOR THE REPUBLIC, TO EDUCATE THE PEOPLE AND THE CORPORATE OFFICERS THAT THEY ARE TRAITORS IN THEIR PRESENT CAPACITIES AND THEY NEED TO RESIGN AND WORK WITH THE REPUBLIC AND COMMON LAW. DO IT OR DIE A SLAVE.

http://conservativetribune.com/gop-to-confiscate-guns-obama/?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=ConservativeTribuneEmail&utm_campaign=DailyBest&utm_content=2015-12-06

New 'ISIS Czar' a Terrorist Sympathizer

BREAKING: Obama’s Choice for New 'ISIS Czar' Will Send Chills Down Your Spine… No Wonder ISIS Is Winning

Newly appointed 'ISIS Czar' a terrorist sympathizer once fired by Obama for Hamas Ties!!!!

When picking an “ISIS czar,” someone whose sole job is to handle the thugs in the Islamic State group, what would be some of the qualifications you would look for? 

Someone who is tough on terrorism? 

How about someone who would scare the savages in the Islamic State group to death?

Or, how about someone who you previously fired for sympathizing with Hamas (one of former President Jimmy Carter’s favorite terrorist groups)? 

No?

Well, that might sound like a bad idea to you, but it sounded like a great idea to 'president' Barack Obama who has named a man he fired for meeting with the terrorist group years ago as his new 'Islamic State czar'.

“The 'president' recently elevated Rob Malley, the NSC coordinator for the Middle East and North Africa, to serve now as the senior adviser to the president for the Counter-ISIL Campaign in Iraq and Syria,” White House spokesman Josh Earnest told reporters during a briefing in France.

Earnest added the 'president' had directed Malley to “support our reinvigorated diplomatic track toward a political transition in Syria.”

What Earnest didn’t mention, but Judicial Watch pointed out, is that “the 'president' had dumped him as a foreign policy adviser for meeting with and having regular contact with Hamas, long classified a terrorist organization by the U.S. State Department.

“Malley’s family had close ties to Yasser Arafat, founder of the Palestine Liberation Organization and the Fatah movement, and Malley was an adviser in Bill Clinton’s White House,” the Judicial Watch report explained.

“He consistently exonerates Palestinians and condemns Israel,” the report continued. “Over the years he has published a number of newspaper opinion pieces urging the United States to reach out and negotiate with terrorist enemies like Hamas, Hezbollah and Muqtada al-Sadr.”

And that’s not all. Even though Obama “fired” Halley, the Arabic-language newspaper Al-Hayat reported that talks continued for months between the administration and Hamas with Malley as an intermediary.

“We were in contact with a number of Obama’s aides through the Internet, and later met with some of them in Gaza, but they advised us not to come out with any statements as they may have a negative effect on his election campaign and be used by Republican candidate John McCain (to attack Obama),” Ahmad Yousuf, an advisor for Hamas’ leader, told Al-Hayat.

This is who the 'president' thinks should be in charge of fighting the Islamic State group — an adviser who was fired for talking to a terrorist organization and who advocates “urging the United States to reach out and negotiate” with brutal terrorists.

No wonder we’re losing the war on the Islamic State group. Obama isn’t even trying.

http://conservativetribune.com/obama-choice-isis-czar/?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=ConservativeTribuneEmail&utm_campaign=DailyBest&utm_content=2015-12-06 

http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2015/12/isis-czar-a-terrorist-sympathizer-once-fired-by-obama-for-hamas-ties/ 

 

Muslim “Clock Boy’s” School Drops MASSIVE Truth Bomb

MUSLIM VALEDICTORIAN AT "CLOCK BOY'S" SCHOOL DROPS MASSIVE TRUTH BOMB......
WE KNEW IT!!!


Ahmed “Clock Boy” Mohamed’s fake tale of     Islamophobia burst into flames this Monday when a former Muslim peer at MacArthur High School in Irving, Texas, revealed that the school had been anything but a hotbed of anti-Muslin sentiment, as both Mohamed and his liberal mainstream media pals had tried to claim.

“MacArthur High School is not an intolerant place, and I’ve had four years to test that hypothesis and come out saying that I’m very proud to have been a MacArthur Cardinal” 18-year-old Amena Jamali, who graduated last spring as valedictorian, told KDFW.

 http://www.fox4news.com/news/54948275-story

 

“MacArthur High is the reason that I do not fear prejudice,” she added.  Her teachers had been so tolerant of her Islamic faith.  In fact, they allowed her to leave classes and tournaments early so she could go and pray, as her faith requires.

These revelations from Jamali stand in stark contrast to the rhetoric of her former peer, Ahmed Mohamed, who cried 'racism' after school officials called the cops on him for bringing to school a suspicious “clock” that looked like a bomb.

But these revelations certainly did not come as a surprise, because we already knew that Mohamed is a liar.  Mohamed claimed that he “invented” the clock, but an investigation by an experienced engineer proved that Mohamed had simply taken apart an existing clock and transplanted its guts into a pencil box. 

None of these facts matter to Mohamed or his allies in the mainstream media, though, as they continue to stick by his fake story. In fact, Mohamed recently demanded that both the city of Irving and its school district pay him $15 million for the stress he allegedly incurred.

Sadly, Mohamed is unlikely ever to suffer any consequences for his behavior, thanks to the liberal mainstream media and 'president' Barack Hussein Obama.

H/T Fox News

http://conservativetribune.com/muslim-valedictorian-at-school/?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=ConservativeTribuneEmail&utm_campaign=DailyBest&utm_content=2015-12-06#  

BOMBSHELL! NASA Scientist Admits Chemtrails Are Real, Testing Conducted at Clemson

 

BOMBSHELL! NASA Scientist Admits Chemtrails Are Real, Testing Conducted at Clemson

 Galactic News, Health and Nutrition, Mother Earth, Truth and Republic, World News

OK GENERAL DUNFORD AND THE JOINT CHIEFS...ARREST THESE SOB'S..... WE JUST HANDED YOU EVIDENCE SO ARREST THESE MURDERS ...GENERAL YOU AND YOUR FAMILY ARE ALSO  BREATHING THIS CRAP!!!

MOST ALL THE AIR-FORCE BASES AS WELL AS EVERGREEN AIR IN MCMINVILLE OREGON ARE THE FIRST ONES THAT NEED TO GO... 

Dec052015       

LISTEN TO THIS VIDEO FIRST THEN THE NEXT ONE

 

DAHBOO777

Published on Dec 4, 2015

www.undergroundworldnews.com
THIS IS TRUE BOMBSHELL INFO! WE HAVE THE SCIENTIST FROM NASA ADMITTING THAT THERE ARE “CHEMTRAILS”. THAT ALONE CHANGES THE GAME. NO ONE CAN CLAIM ANY LONGER THAT ITS JUST A CONSPIRACY! WE NOW HAVE PROOF THAT THEY ARE REAL, THEY HAVE LITHIUM IN THEM, TESTS ARE BEING CONDUCTED AT CLEMSON UNIVERSITY AND THE FLIGHTS MAY BE TAKING OFF FROM WALLOPS FLIGHT FACILITY IN VIRGINIA! GET THIS INFO OUT AND MAKE IT VIRAL QUICK!

I UPLOADED AUDIO TO J.KNIGHT CHANNEL:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jzrGH…

https://zeekly.com/video/7962/chemtra…
UPDATED INFO: THEY HAVE ALREADY REMOVED HIS MIGUEL’S PAGE, THEY KNOW WE ARE ON TO EM!http://www.clemson.edu/ces/physics-as…

Senate approves bill repealing much of ObamaCare

SENATE  APPROVES  BILL  REPEALING  MUCH  OF  'OBAMACARE'

IT'S ABOUT TIME!

THE HILL

Alexander Bolton 

12/03/15 08:23 PM EST

The Senate on Thursday passed legislation repealing the core pillars of ObamaCare, taking a major step toward sending such a bill to the president’s desk for the first time.

Republicans hailed it as a political messaging victory and a fulfillment of their promise from the 2014 midterm election to force 'president' Obama to veto the landmark healthcare reform law named after him.

 

 

The measure passed 52-47 after the Senate voted to significantly strengthen the bill originally passed by the House and brought straight to the floor by Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.).

The House will need to approve the amended legislation before it can be sent to the White House.

Thursday’s vote was a major event in the Senate, as Democrats never allowed a stand-alone vote on an ObamaCare repeal bill when they controlled the chamber.

Democrats were also unable to block the GOP measure, which was brought to the floor under budget reconciliation rules that prevented a filibuster.

“For too long, Democrats did everything to prevent Congress from passing the type of legislation necessary to help these Americans who are hurting,” McConnell said on the floor. “Today, that ends.”

The measure guts the law by repealing authority for the federal government to run healthcare exchanges, and scrapping subsidies to help people afford plans bought through those exchanges. It zeros out the penalties on individuals who do not buy insurance and employers who do not offer health insurance.

Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), who is running for the Democratic presidential nomination, missed the final vote. 

The vote caps weeks of intense and at times acrimonious debate within the Senate GOP conference over how far the repeal should go.

Conservative Sens. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) and Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), who are running for president, and Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) threatened to oppose a House-passed repeal bill for not going far enough.

Three moderates, Sens. Susan Collins (R-Maine), Mark Kirk (R-Ill.) and Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), balked at it for including language defunding Planned Parenthood.

GOP leaders briefly floated the possibility of dropping the Planned Parenthood language but dropped the idea knowing it could spark a conservative backlash.

Instead, McConnell leaned on Cruz, Rubio and Lee to vote yes and sweetened the prospect by crafting an amendment that dramatically beefed up the Senate package. All three voted yes.

“This bill is a substantial improvement over the original House bill, and I’m grateful to Senate conservatives and Senate leadership for joining me in making it so,” Cruz said in a statement after the vote. 

It repeals the expansion of Medicaid adopted by 30 states as well as many of the law’s tax increases, which the House bill left in place.

It cuts funding for the Prevention and Public Health Fund and eliminates risk adjustment programs from insurance companies that lose money because of the law.

The House bill eliminates the individual and employer mandates, the "Cadillac tax" on expensive insurance plans and the medical device tax.

The question of how to handle Medicaid was a thorny one for McConnell because it pitted conservatives, who demanded a repeal, against Republican colleagues from states that expanded the safety-net program.

“I am very concerned about the 160,000 people who had Medicaid expansion in my state. I have difficulty with that being included,” Sen. Shelley Moore Capito, a Republican from West Virginia, told The Hill earlier this month.

Vulnerable GOP incumbents face reelection next year in several states that have expanded Medicaid: Illinois, New Hampshire, Ohio and Pennsylvania.

McConnell eased their concerns by phasing in the repeal over two years to give the federal government and states time to come up with a replacement program.

The Senate bill also repeals the over-the-counter medicine tax, the prescription drug tax, an annual fee on health insurers and the tax on indoor tanning services. It reduces the threshold of healthcare costs that can be deducted from 10 percent to 7.5 percent of adjusted gross income.

Cruz and Rubio signaled to GOP leaders earlier in the week that they would vote for the package but Cruz held out, keeping his colleagues guessing.

The GOP leadership braced itself for the possibility that Cruz might attempt to force the Senate to vote on a one-sentence provision repealing the entire bill, which the Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough had ruled out of order.

Cruz could have attempted to overturn the ruling of the presiding chair, who almost always follows the advice of the parliamentarian, with a simple-majority vote. But he decided not to, a pragmatic move since he colleagues were unlikely to back him.

Collins and Kirk voted against the repeal package after an amendment they offered earlier in the day to strike the language defunding Planned Parenthood failed by a vote of 48-52.

Murkowski, another sponsor of the amendment to protect Planned Parenthood funding, voted yes for the broader bill after declining to take a public position before the floor debate.

The Senate voted throughout the afternoon on a variety of amendments, many of them intended to send a political message.

Democrats sought to score political points by offering an amendment sponsored by Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) to bar suspected terrorists from buying guns. It failed by a vote of 45-54.

The Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee blasted vulnerable Republicans who opposed it.

“It’s reprehensible that with everything going on in the world, these senators won’t stand up to the special interests and pass a commonsense measure like closing the terrorist gun loophole,” said Lauren Passalacqua, a spokeswoman for the committee.

An amendment sponsored by Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), another presidential candidate, to loosen restrictions on concealed weapons permits fell six votes short of the 60 it needed as a nongermane proposal. 

Senators passed by a vote of 90-10 an amendment sponsored by Sen. Dean Heller (R-Nev.) to repeal the "Cadillac tax" on expensive health plans. The provision was included in the House bill but had to be sunset to pass parliamentary muster in the upper chamber. Heller’s amendment removed the time-limiting language.

Jordain Carney contributed to this story.

http://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/262071-senate-approves-bill-repealing-much-of-obamacare

New York Times, working with the 'gov admin,' again calls for MORE GUN CONTROL MEASURES

NEW YORK TIMES, IN RARE FRONT PAGE EDITORIAL, CALLS FOR OUTLAWING SOME RIFLES! 

By Alex Dobuzinskis 7 hours ago

(Reuters) - The New York Times, in its first front-page editorial in nearly a century, on Saturday called for outlawing the kinds of rifles used in the California shooting massacre this week that left 14 people dead.

The newspaper's editorial comes three days after Syed Rizwan Farook and Tashfeen Malik, a married couple, carried out the mass shooting in San Bernardino with legally-purchased, .223 caliber assault-style rifles. FBI officials have said they are investigating the shooting as an "act of terrorism."  The couple also had semi-automatic pistols, and U.S. officials have said Malik is believed to have pledged allegiance to a leader of the militant group Islamic State.

"Certain kinds of weapons, like the slightly modified combat rifles used in California, and certain kinds of ammunition, must be outlawed for civilian ownership," the New York Times editorial said.

The editorial went on to argue that an act to outlaw such weapons would "require Americans who own those kinds of weapons to give them up for the good of their fellow citizens."

The piece made brief mention of other U.S. mass shootings. "Let's be clear: These spree killings are all, in their own ways, acts of terrorism," it said. 

'president' Barack Obama has called for legislation to make it harder for 'criminals' to get guns. He has noted mass shootings do not happen as frequently in other advanced countries and said the United States should address the problem. 

Republicans in Congress have mounted heavy opposition to gun control measures. 

The debate over gun control has long been one of the most contentious political issues in the United States, with the right to gun ownership enshrined in the U.S. Constitution's 2nd Amendment. 

In a post on the website of the libertarian magazine Reason, senior editor Brian Doherty criticized the editorial, and in particular the call for citizens to eventually give up certain rifles. 

"What the Times is calling for is, beyond its countable costs in money and effort and the likely further erosion of civil liberties, also (as they surely know) calling for a massive political civil war the likes of which we haven't seen in a long time," Doherty wrote. 

It is the first time The Times has run an editorial on the front page since 1920, when the newspaper expressed dismay at the nomination of Warren G. Harding as the Republican presidential candidate. Harding went on to win the general election that year.

(Reporting by Alex Dobuzinskis; Editing by Simon Cameron-Moore)

http://news.yahoo.com/york-times-rare-front-page-editorial-calls-outlawing-071431605.html 

THE GUNS ARE NOT THE PROBLEM. THE FOLKS THIS 'GOV' PROGRAMS WITH MKULTRA TO BE VIOLENT AND TO TARGET CERTAIN GROUPS - THAT IS THE PROBLEM. ELIMINATE THIS ROGUE CABAL 'GOV' AND PROBLEM SOLVED. AMERICA, TAKE YOUR COUNTRY BACK!!!

 

The New York Times back on track with 'GUN CONTROL'

The New York Times' Front-Page Editorial On Gun Control Is Bad

It ignores most gun violence 

 

On Saturday, The New York Times printed a front-page editorial -- its first since 1920 -- calling for greater restrictions on gun ownership in the United States. You can read the piece here, but be warned: It's deeply flawed.

The Times doesn't use the term, but the policy it's advocating is what's generally called an assault weapons ban. Assault weapons bans are hard to write and implement, and easy to undermine and circumvent. Even a perfect assault weapons ban wouldn't do anything about most gun violence, because most gun violence involves handguns that aren't forbidden under such laws.

The Times' editorial board claims, without evidence or argument, that "it is possible to define" "in a clear and effective way" "certain kinds of weapons ... and certain kinds of ammunition, [that] must be outlawed for civilian ownership." 

But previous laws targeting "certain kinds of weapons" in the U.S. have generally failed to achieve their goals. 

The federal assault weapons ban passed in the 1990s was riddled with loopholes, and a Justice Department-funded study found little evidence it saved lives. And, as my colleague Daniel Marans reported Friday, the shooters who killed 14 people in San Bernardino on Wednesday used legally purchased rifles that escaped California's assault weapons ban because of a loophole.

Regular readers of The New York Times already know about the problems with assault weapons bans. Last year, the paper co-published a story by ProPublica's Lois Beckett on the subject. The Times headlined it "The Assault Weapons Myth." And, as Beckett reported in another story, even gun control groups such as the Brady Campaign for Gun Violence and Everytown for Gun Safety have de-emphasized assault-weapons bans, opting to focus their attention on measures that are more likely to be effective at preventing gun violence.

There's a good reason for gun-control groups' caution. As Beckett noted in her piece, most gun violence in America involves handguns. But the Times editorial does nothing to deal with that hard truth. The word handgun does not appear in the piece. To the Times' credit, it mentions that its plan would require some gun owners to give up their weapons. But it doesn't explain how the government would go about getting people to surrender them. 

There are 300 million guns in American homes. Confiscating even a small percentage of these -- the Times' "certain weapons" -- would be an enormous, dangerous, and politically fraught undertaking. Banning civilians from owning "certain kinds of ammunition," as the Times also suggests, would be even harder.

Perhaps most glaringly, though, this editorial fails to mention that electoral politics -- specifically Republicans' dominance of the U.S. Congress and the fact that some Democrats seem to be more afraid of the NRA than they are of gun control groups -- is the biggest reason why President Barack Obama wasn't able to pass even modest gun control measures in the wake of the Newtown massacre.

Congressional Democrats tried pushing new gun control measures again on Thursday, by the way. Republicans blocked them all. But "if you want gun control, vote for liberal Democrats for Congress" would be a short editorial.


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/new-york-times-gun-control-editorial_5662644ee4b08e945fefbb50?ncid=txtlnkusaolp00000592

Why The U.S. Has Avoided Bombing ISIS Oil Wells

The Bizarre Explanation For Why The U.S. Has Avoided Bombing ISIS Oil Wells

Why hasn’t the U.S. bombed the oil wells that ISIS controls into oblivion by now?  Would you believe that it is because the Obama administration “didn’t want to do environmental damage”? 

Former Deputy Director of the CIA Michael Morell has publicly admitted that the USA military has purposely avoided damaging the main source of income for ISIS, and his explanation for why we were doing this is utterly bizarre. 

But at this point what could the Obama administration say that would actually make sense? 

Everyone now knows that ISIS has been making  hundreds of millions of dollars selling oil in Turkey, and that this has been done with the full knowledge and complicity of the Obama White House. 

This is potentially the biggest scandal of the entire Obama presidency, and yet so far the Republicans have not jumped on it.

If you or I even gave five bucks to ISIS, we would be arrested and hauled off to Guantanamo Bay and yet Barack Obama is allowing ISIS to funnel massive quantities of oil through our NATO ally Turkey, and he is not doing anything to stop this from happening.  It is a betrayal of the American people that is so vast that it is hard to put into words.

By now, virtually everyone on the entire planet knows exactly what is going on.  For example, Iraq’s former National Security Adviser Mowaffak al-Rubaie shared the following on his Facebook page on Saturday…

“First and foremost, the Turks help the militants sell stolen Iraqi and Syrian oil for $20 a barrel, which is half the market price.”

Until Russia started bombing the living daylights out of them, an endless parade of trucks carrying ISIS oil would go back and forth over the Turkish border completely unmolested.  Following the downing of a Russian SU-24 bomber by Turkey in an area where many of these trucks travel, Russian President Vladimir Putin decided to publicly air this dirty laundry. 

Just check out what Putin told reporters following a meeting with French President Francois Hollande last week…

Commercial-scale oil smuggling from Islamic State controlled territory into Turkey must be stopped, Putin said after meeting Hollande in Moscow.
“Vehicles, carrying oil, lined up in a chain going beyond the horizon,” said Putin, reminding the press that the scale of the issue was discussed at the G20 summit in Antalya earlier this month, where the Russian leader demonstrated reconnaissance footage taken by Russian pilots.
The views resemble a “living oil pipe” stretched from ISIS and rebel controlled areas of Syria into Turkey, the Russian President stressed. “Day and night they are going to Turkey. Trucks always go there loaded, and back from there – empty.”
“We are talking about a commercial-scale supply of oil from the occupied Syrian territories seized by terrorists. It is from these areas [that oil comes from], and not with any others. And we can see it from the air, where these vehicles are going,” Putin said.

If the Russians could see all of this, the U.S. military could see it, too.  In fact, we have far better surveillance capabilities than the Russians do.

 

So why didn’t Obama put an end to this?

Well, as I mentioned above, former Deputy Director of the CIA Michael Morell told PBS that the Obama administration didn’t want “to create environmental damage” (yet this administration, as with former, continues to daily spray the entire planet with heavy metals, viruses and other poisonous chemicals that is literally killing off the entire planet???) and he insists that the oil wells are “infrastructure that’s going to be necessary to support the people when ISIS isn’t there anymore”. 

The following comes from the Daily Caller…

Appearing on PBS’s “Charlie Rose” on Tuesday, Rose pointed out that before the terrorist attacks in Paris, the U.S. had not bombed ISIS-controlled oil tankers.
Morell explained, “Prior to Paris, there seemed to be a judgment that … look, we don’t want to destroy these oil tankers because that’s infrastructure that’s going to be necessary to support the people when ISIS isn’t there anymore, and it’s going to create environmental damage. And we didn’t go after oil wells — actually hitting oil wells that ISIS controls because we didn’t want to do environmental damage and we didn’t want to destroy that infrastructure, right.”

In case you think that this is some sort of a joke, you can watch video of Morell making these comments on PBS below…

https://youtu.be/TgMgjPzXqg4

After the terror attacks in Paris, the Obama administration finally was shamed into bombing a few of these oil trucks.  But 45 minutes before the U.S. military bombed them, they dropped leaflets telling the truck drivers to “get out of your trucks now and run away from them”.

What kind of “war on terror” are we running?

Why in the world would we want to warn the terrorists to get away from their trucks?

Meanwhile, things between Russia and Turkey continue to get even more tense.  The Russians have slapped severe economic sanctions on the Turks.  They have shut down all channels of communication with Turkey’s military, and they are bombing every Turkish vehicle that they can find inside Syria. 

The following comes from a report that was put out by Debka…

In the last two days, Putin has been found saying one thing and doing another: Although he declared that Russia would not go to war with Turkey for “stabbing it in the back”, debkafile’s military and intelligence sources report that since Wednesday night, Nov. 25, Russian heavy bombers and warplanes have been hitting every Turkish vehicle moving or stationary inside Syria.
They bombed the Bab al-Hawa border crossing, located on the Turkey-Syria frontier, as well trailers and tractors parked in an area belonging to the Turkish Humanitarian Relief Foundation, on the Syrian side of the border.

As I wrote about the other day, it has been documented that our NATO ally Turkey has been “training ISIS militants, funneling weapons to them, buying their oil, and tending to their wounded in Turkish hospitals”. 

Now, heavy bombing by the Russians threatens to cut off those links…

In addition to punishing the Turkish leader, Russia’s massive military operations in Syria aim to degrade the rebel groups fighting the Assad regime. Heavy bombing sorties this week on the Syrian-Turkish border are cutting off tens of thousands of rebels from their only source of fresh supplies of weapons, ammo, food and fighters, leaving them without a line of retreat and nowhere to send their wounded.

At this point, Russia and Turkey are very close to a state of war.

But as a member of NATO, the United States is obligated to help protect Turkey if a full-blown shooting war does break out.

We are closer to World War III than we have been in decades, and yet most Americans are still completely and totally oblivious to what is taking place.

Hopefully, cooler heads will prevail because things over in the Middle East threaten to spiral completely and totally out of control.

---

Michael T. Snyder is a graduate of the McIntire School of Commerce at the University of Virginia and has a law degree and an LLM from the University of Florida Law School. He is an attorney that has worked for some of the largest and most prominent law firms in Washington D.C. and who now spends his time researching and writing and trying to wake the American people up.

    http://www.thesleuthjournal.com/the-bizarre-explanation-for-why-the-u-s-has-avoided-bombing-isis-oil-wells/

Cruz: "This Nation Needs a Wartime President to Defend It"

Ted Cruz: 'This Nation Needs a Wartime President to Defend It'

10:41 AM,  Dec 03, 2015
Michael Warren

Texas senator Ted Cruz kicked off Thursday's Republican Jewish Coalition presidential forum in Washington with a speech filled with applause lines that revved up the crowd.

Cruz focused primarily on national security and foreign policy, touting his record in the Senate and displaying his knack for rhetorical bombs. It went over well with the audience.

His biggest round of applause came when he made a pledge about the nuclear deal with Iran. "If I am elected president, I have pledged in my very first day in office to rip to shreds this catastrophic deal," he said. Audience members cheered and stood in their seats.

Click on link below to listen to Ted Cruz

"We are at a time of war"

http://launch.newsinc.com/share.html?trackingGroup=91474&siteSection=weeklystandard&videoId=30020816

Cruz earned cheers for his characterization of the current stakes. "I believe this nation needs a wartime president to defend it," he said. Another first-day-in-office promise—"we will begin the process of moving the American embassy to Jerusalem"—also earned cheers. 

He excoriated President Obama for being a "an apologist for radical Islamic terrorism" and mocked John Kerry for the secretary of state's feckless response to terrorist attacks of recent months in France.

Perhaps in anticipation of a question that would come after his speech about his lack of experience, Cruz spent some of his address listing off some of his Senate accomplishments. Or, at least, positions he has taken in Congress. "When John Kerry was nominated, only 3 senators voted against his nomination," Cruz said. "Never have I been prouder to be one of those three."

He spoke about his work with New Jersey Democratic senator Bob Menendez to fund a reward for catching Hamas terrorists who kidnapped and killed an Israeli teen, Naftali Fraenkel, with dual American citizenship.

Although the speech emphasized Cruz's hawkish foreign policy views, the Republican presidential candidate also touched on his opposition to American military efforts in Libya, Egypt, and Syria to depose dictators. It was part of what he called a "misguided foreign policy of Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and unfortunately too many Republicans in this town." 

That was a lightly veiled shot at one of his rivals, Marco Rubio, who has taken a more aggressive stance on military intervention in the Middle East. "If we are to defeat our enemy, we need to be clear-eyed, that toppling a government and allowing a terrorist organization to take over a nation is not benefitting our national security," Cruz said.

On the question of his fitness for office, which came from one of the attendees, Cruz echoed Rubio when the Florida senator receives similar comparison to first-term senator Barack Obama. Cruz, however, gave his answer his own personal flair.

"When the media asks, 'gosh, aren't you like Barack Obama?', my reaction to reporters is, 'I thought you thought that was a good thing!" he said to laughs and applause.

"Last I checked, he won two presidential elections," Cruz continued. "And listen, Barack Obama is not a bad president because he was a senator. Barack Obama is a bad president because he's an unmitigated socialist who won't stand up and defend the United States of America."

Cruz launched into a passionate defense of strong ideological leadership from a presidential candidate, noting both examples from Obama and Ronald Reagan as different sides of the same coin.

"When Barack Obama said he wanted to fundamentally transform this country, he meant it," Cruz said, and one audience member could be heard saying "Yep" in agreement. 

"We need to nominate a president who is as committed to conservative principles as Barack Obama is to liberal ones."

http://www.weeklystandard.com/cruz-this-nation-needs-a-wartime-president-to-defend-it/article/2000053

FIGHTING BACK

TEXAS SECESSION  RESOLUTION PASSES GOP COMMITTEE

Non-binding independence measure headed for full-party vote Saturday

Douglas Ernst

Republish Online

Republish Offline

Reprint

Get Syndication Feed

The Lone Star State will find out on Saturday just how eager its Republicans are to reconstitute the Republic of Texas.

A state GOP committee in Austin passed a secession resolution on Friday that will require a full-party vote on Saturday. The non-binding measure would gauge the desire among state Republicans to secede.

“If the federal government continues to disregard the constitution and the sovereignty of the State of Texas, the State of Texas should reassert its status as an independent nation,” the measure reads, the Chronicle reported Friday.

State Republican Executive Committee member Tanya Robertson of Galveston and Brazoria counties introduced the resolution due to constituents’ demands.

A Declaration of Independence from Mexico was issued March 1, 1836, to found the Republic of Texas. Sam Houston was subsequently elected president and general of the Texas army, which would then take on Mexico’s Gen. Antonio Lopez de Santa Anna.

“Let’s make their victory worse than a defeat,” Texas Col. William B. Travis said of Santa Anna’s 4,000-man army as they approached the Alamo in San Antonio, historian Larry Schweikart writes in “A Patriot’s History of the United States.”

Texas would eventually go on to join the Union on Dec. 29, 1845.

If the SREC approves the secession resolution on Saturday, then it will appear on the March 1, 2016, Republican primary ballot.

The Chronicle managed to interview 13 of 40 members of the SREC this week. Six members supported a vote on independence, six opposed, and one declined to comment.

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 1861 that secession is illegal, and Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia wrote to a citizen on the issue in 2006, “If there was any constitutional issue resolved by the Civil War, it is that there is no right to secede. (Hence, in the Pledge of Allegiance, ‘one Nation, indivisible.’),” the Wall Street Journal reported.

Pro-secession Texans would likely prepare its citizens for the federal government’s reaction by citing the Declaration of Independence, signed July 4, 1776.

“Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.”

http://www.wnd.com/2015/12/texas-secession-resolution-passes-gop-committee/





**************************************************************
THOROUGH RESEARCH OF THE TRUE HISTORY OF TEXAS (HIDDEN FROM PUBLIC BY CORPORATION CABAL INFLUENCE) WILL PROVIDE EVIDENCE THAT TEXAS WAS BROUGHT IN TO THE FEDERATION WITH THE (ENGLISH) WASHINGTON DC CORPORATION UNDER FALSE PRETEXT - THE GOOD PEOPLE OF TEXAS WERE NOT TRUTHFULLY AND PROPERLY INFORMED OF THE MEANING OF THIS AFFILIATION TAKING PLACE, THAT THIS ASSOCIATION WAS TO BE UNDER THE DIRECTION OF MASONIC ENGLISH RULE AND A CONSTITUTION REWRITTEN FOR THIS CORPORATION IN WASHINGTON DO AND NOT THE ACTUAL ORGANIC CONSTITUTION OF THE TRUE REPUBLIC..  SAM HOUSTON WAS A MASON AND IN LEAGUE WITH THE MASONIC INFLUENCES OF THE CORPORATE ENGLISH INFLUENCED AND CONTROLLED CORPORATE 'GOVERNMENT' THAT TOOK OVER THE REPUBLIC.  FROM THAT TIME FORWARD THE REPUBLIC OF TEXAS HAS BEEN OPERATING UNDER A GOUNDATION OF FRAUD, AND THE NATION'S ASSETS HAVE BEEN SEIZED AND CONTROLLED BY THE ENEMY WITHIN THE UNITED STATES.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_Lodge_of_Texas  
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_B._Travis 

 

Muslims Behead An Innocent Man

Muslims Behead An Innocent Man And Then Declare This Message To Russia And To Putin: “You will not find peace in your homes. We will kill your sons”

 

 December 2, 2015 

 Theodore Shoebat 


ISIS recently beheaded a man they accuse of being a Russian spy, and then gave this message to Russia and Putin: “You will not find peace in your homes. We will kill your sons”. 

According to one report:

ISIS released video Wednesday showing the beheading of a man it claims joined the terrorist group but was, in fact, a Russian spy as well as a message chastising Russian President Vladimir Putin and threatening his country’s citizens.

As the captive kneels before him in an orange jumpsuit, his killer says in Russian that the airstrikes ordered by Putin against the Islamist extremist group has “made us understand that we are doing right thing” by continuing their fight.

He then addresses the Russian people, saying, “You will not find peace in your homes.

We will kill your sons … for each son you killed here. And we will destroy your homes for each home you destroyed here.”

ISIS will not stand a chance before the Orthodox army forces of Russia.

http://shoebat.com/2015/12/02/muslims-declare-this-message-to-russia-and-to-putin-you-will-not-find-peace-in-your-homes-we-will-kill-your-sons/ 

Critics of Islam “will be prosecuted”

Day after Muslim terrorist attacks in California, US Attorney General says 'Jail Americans who don’t stand!' with Islam

Andrew Bieszad 

December 4, 2015

Speaking barely a day after the horrific terrorist attack in California, Obama-appointed Attorney General Loretta Lynch said at the annual Muslim Advocates annual Dinner that critics of Islam “will be prosecuted” if speech about Islam “edges” towards violence:

Attorney General Loretta Lynch on Thursday warned that the Justice Department could take aggressive action against people whose anti-Muslim rhetoric “edges towards violence” and told the Muslim community that “we stand with you in this.”
…
Lynch made it clear that she shares those concerns, but vowed to use the DOJ to protect Muslims from discrimination and violence. Noting the rise in violence against Muslims and mosques in the wake of the Paris attacks, Lynch added that, “When we talk about the First amendment, we [must] make it clear that actions predicated on violent talk are not American. They are not who we are, they are not what we do, and they will be prosecuted.”

“My message not just to the Muslim community but to all Americans is ‘We cannot give in to the fear that these backlashes are really based on,’” Lynch said.

On the Muslim Advocates web site advertising the dinner and Ms. Lynch as the keynote speaker, it says under her photo that she is going to discuss the “priorities of the 
U. S. Department of Justice, particularly its efforts to combat anti-Muslim hate and discrimination”:

If you think it’s bad that Obama is threatening YOUR right to free speech, it’s not going to get any better if Obama gets his way in bringing tens of thousands of Muslims into the country as “refugees.”

How much things have changed within the last decade.

http://shoebat.com/2015/12/04/obamas-attorney-general-says-jail-americans-who-dont-stand-with-islam-the-day-after-muslim-terrorist-attacks-in-california/ 

All what you should know about N.E.S.A.R.A.