OBAMA ON IMPORTING MUSLIM JAHADISTS
IN TO THE UNITED STATES
Thursday, February 25, 2016
Indisputable Case for a Temporary Military Takeover of the U.S. Federal Government
Four Star General Presents Indisputable Case for a Temporary Military Takeover of the 'U.S. Federal Government'
In the absence of a military-coordinated peaceful coup d’état there may be only one other alternative for the American people.
“When 5 million Oathkeepers and armed militia surround the Capitol Building one day and force out the entire Congress, the place will change in a New York minute.
When the American people install a provisional government, the White House will finally be taken back from those who misappropriated it.”
***
To All Concerned Americans,
These United States of America have reached a critical juncture. As a matter of historical fact, this country has committed a series of heinous war crimes through the prosecution of several unprovoked wars of aggression throughout the world. This preplanned scheme to wage unlawful and undeclared wars against innocent nations has been clearly explained by one of the highest ranking generals of the U.S. Army (See video above).
Because the relevant allegations have been publicly made by a 4-star General of the U.S. Army, their import and gravity must be acted upon. Not to do so makes every member of the U.S. Congress guilty of misprision of felony. Hence, the preceding video ought to be sent to every single congressperson in the event that there are any legislators who have not yet viewed it.
Please have no doubt about the severe implications of the account that General Wesley Clark has presented to the world-at-large via the Internet. Essentially, he has presented a legally sound pretext for the immediate arrest and incarceration of the entire Neocon cabal and their numerous co-conspirators throughout government and the corporate sector. This would include President Barack Hussein Obama, Vice President Joseph Biden, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Secretary of Defense Ash Carter and Secretary of State John Kerry.
This video presentation actually offers solid legal proof for a legitimate criminal indictment so grave and substantiated are the accusations. Given that these serious allegations have been asserted by a flag officer of the U.S. Army, and witnessed while he was serving on active duty, his testimony carries the weight of over whelming legal force.
General Clark’s testimony is further validated by the spoken words of one of the Neocon’s major intelligence-gathering outfits known as Stratfor. As follows:
STRATFOR Chief Reveals Zio-Anglo-American Plot For World Domination
In light of the ongoing and wholesale destruction of the sovereign nation of Syria, it becomes that much more necessary for all proper authorities to act with deliberate speed and due process. Not to act on these extremely serious allegations constitutes a profound dereliction of duty on the part of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and all subordinate flag officers. Even junior officers can be held criminally responsible for carrying out patently unlawful orders to commit war crimes and genocide.
The truth be told, the U.S. Federal Government has been a party to the most devastating series of illegal and unprovoked wars of aggression in modern history. The grimmer reality of this entire situation is that the American people permitted their leaders to commit such egregious atrocities IN THEIR NAME and WITH THEIR TAX DOLLARS. Therefore, by re-electing President Obama, they are complicit in their government’s deplorable and criminal conduct.
There is really only one way out of this predicament for the body politic. The American people must immediately demand the dissolution of the Obama Administration. Every senior member must be arrested and imprisoned until a tribunal can be assembled by the International Criminal Court at The Hague. Upon seating a jury that is broadly represented by the world community of nations, a globally televised trial can then proceed forthwith.
It is imperative that the behavior of the U.S. Federal Government (as well as that of the United Kingdom) be fully exposed for all to see and punishment be meted out commensurate with the unprecedented serial nature of said war crimes.
General Clark made it very clear in his verbal “indictment” that the co-conspirators in the implementation of these crimes against humanity had premeditated plans on the drawing board for many years. That the utilization of the U.S. Military was for the purpose of nation devastation, not nation building as George W. Bush once tried to hawk, is truly one of the worst institutional deceptions of our times.
This is VERY serious business and We The People will no longer accept the serial transgression of federal statutes and military law. Nor will We the People allow the further trashing of the Constitution by the Obama Administration.
From this point forward, every member of the U.S. Armed Services is walking a very fine line. The continued execution of unlawful orders is both criminal and immoral, repugnant and cowardly. Therefore, every soldier and pilot, Seal and Green Beret is cautioned from entering war zones which were illicitly created by the U.S. Federal Government. The entire nation of Syria represents such an illegitimate war zone.[1] In fact the Middle East has multiple theaters of war which have been fabricated through false flags attacks and other black operations.
The Syrian Holocaust: A Preplanned Genocide And Forced Exodus
As General Clark stated, they planned on invading Syria in order to dominate it … and so they did along with 6 other countries.
In closing, may the words of Edmund Burke inspire men and women everywhere to do what is right where it concerns the future destiny of the United States of America.
“All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.”Conclusion
There is no more effective endeavor that the American people can undertake in this moment to prevent a full-blown World War III from breaking out than acting on this brave general’s indictment.
The whole world is now watching the daily escalation of events in Syria and Iraq. Everyone is wondering when the USA and its proxies will do something so provocative that the Mideast will be turned into an apocalyptic conflagration. Hence, it is highly recommended that every recipient of this missive disseminate it by every means possible. After all, it is the very same Neocon co-conspirators who are responsible for turning the Middle East into a virtual Armageddon … in real time!
The Levant and Armageddon, Syria and World War III
Concerned Citizens of the USA
February 20, 2016
Special Note
It has never been so urgent for the people of the world to take responsibility into their own hands. The citizenries around the globe have been profoundly betrayed by their governments. Consequently, the people — We the People — must act now. Otherwise, the terrible wars that you see waged in foreign lands will come to your own doorstep.
The time to act is now. If not for the people of the destroyed nations across the oceans, then for yourselves since a World War 3 will deeply impact the entire planetary civilization. Before you act, put your hands together in prayerful supplication and ask for the strength and faith and perseverance to see through every initiative toward establishing an enduring peace.
May Almighty God bless you and your noble deeds!
Author’s Note
Does anyone really want to see it come to this in an election year? The following two essays lay bare exactly what the current condition of the American Republic really is. Both of them gives very good reason to pause … and then aggressively pursue the only options left for We the People.
2016 — A Critical Year! The American People Must Act NOW … Or Face The Consequences Of Electing Treasonous Leadership
2016 in the USA : A 2nd American Revolution, Civil War, or Both
Endnotes
[1] Putin Goes Ballistic In Syria, Obliterates The USA’s Secret ‘Mideast Strategy’
Source: State of the Nation
http://www.theeventchronicle.com/news/north-america/four-star-general-presents-indisputable-case-for-a-temporary-military-takeover-of-the-u-s-federal-government/?utm_campaign=coschedule&utm_source=facebook_page&utm_medium=The%20Event%20Handbook&utm_conten#
Piute County Utah - BLM and Forest Service are at it again against ranchers
Piute County Sheriff threatens arrest of Forest Service personnel
PIUTE COUNTY, Utah -- It's the second smallest county by population in Utah, but Piute County is making a lot of noise in the Western Land Movement these days.
Longtime rancher Stanton Gleave is at the center of a conflict that includes the County Sheriff on one side and the U.S. Forest Service on the other.
Gleave wore his cowboy hat and held up a pocket edition of the U.S. Constitution as he spoke with the Rural Caucus of the Utah State legislature on Feb. 12.
"These federal people have no right to be here if you follow (the Constitution)," Gleave said.
The Piute County Sheriff, Marty Gleave, (We're told Marty is Stanton's nephew) also talked with the Rural Caucus.
"We're not taking no more cuts on the Mountain. I'll deputize every man, woman and child in the county to stop what's going on," Sheriff Gleave said, referring to Monroe Mountain, where the Forest Service has taken grazing permits from Stanton Gleave and another rancher, Keith Anderton.
The Forest Service is working to revitalize aspen growth on Monroe Mountain.
Seventy-four percent of the land in Piute County is controlled by the Bureau of Land Management and the Forest Service.
Piute County is located in central Utah about 157 miles south of Provo.
Utah Sheriff Will Arrest Federal Agents!
(With enhanced audio)
http://fox13now.com/2016/02/23/piute-county-sheriff-threatens-arrest-of-forest-service-personnel/
What Part of “Against the Law” Does Obama Not Understand?
What Part of “Against the Law” Does Obama Not Understand?
Why are we even presuming to ask that question when Obama is, by all accounts, lawless?
Hot Air – Count Mitch McConnell among the unimpressed with Barack Obama’s plan to close the detention center at Guantanamo Bay. The Senate Majority Leader responded to Obama’s declared plan to transfer its detainees to one or more of thirteen potential locations within the US by reminding the President that Congress has opposed such a move on a bipartisan basis. And, by the way, such a move would be illegal — under bills Obama has already signed:
What part of “it’s against the law” does Obama not understand regarding his intentions to transfer Gitmo detainees to the US?
Published on Feb 23, 2016
Senate
Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said Tuesday that Congress will review
President Barack Obama's plan to close the Guantanamo Bay prison, but he
warned the 'bipartisan will of Congress' has already spoken out against
the proposal. (Feb. 23)
Count Paul Ryan among the unimpressed as well:
The TRUTH about Marco Rubio comes out - Americans BEWARE!!!!!
Nation’s ICE Officers Detail How Marco Rubio Betrayed Them
19 Feb 2016
Washington D.C.
In an exclusive Q&A with Breitbart News, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Council President Chris Crane provides never-before-heard details about the 2013 Gang of Eight immigration fight that are likely to shake up an already tumultuous presidential race.
ICE Council President, Crane represents the nation’s approximately 5,800 frontline ICE officers, agents and personnel who are responsible for enforcing America’s immigration laws in all 50 states and U.S. territories.
For the first time ever, Crane details his behind-the- scenes interactions with Florida Sen. Marco Rubio (79% R-FL) as Crane sought to protect the nation’s ICE officers and national security.
Crane was integral to stopping Sen. Rubio’s amnesty plan from passing the House — which, as Sen. Jeff Sessions (80% R-AL) recently explained, “was a near-run thing."
In his responses, Crane addresses an incident — first detailed by Breitbart News — in which Marco Rubio stood idly by as Crane was ejected from a Gang of Eight press conference for trying to ask a question on behalf of law enforcement.
Crane, an active duty ICE officer, has served as an officer for approximately 13 years and has been elected by his peers as the president of their union, as thus their voice on the national stage. Prior to joining ICE, Crane was a United States Marine.
What follows below are the complete, unedited responses of National ICE Council President Chris Crane.
BREITBART NEWS: It is well known that the Gang of Eight reached out to big business groups and amnesty groups in the process of writing the bill. When Sen. Rubio started writing his bill, did he reach out to you and other ICE officers for your ideas and input?
CRANE: Sen. Rubio never reached out to us. He surrounded himself with big business and amnesty groups, most of which were more interested in cheap labor and their own political agendas, and had no real concern for the welfare of immigrants, public safety, or the security of our nation. This while he ignored 'boots on the ground' law enforcement officers who work within our broken immigration system every day and know better than any what’s needed to fix it. Common sense dictates that law enforcement be at the table when creating a bill like this. I think Sen. Rubio knew that, but actively chose to exclude us because of his own personal agenda.
BNN: Did Sen. Rubio meet with you voluntarily or did he have to be pressured into doing so at the last minute? Do you remember how you were ultimately able to secure the meeting? Did it take a long time?
CHRIS CRANE: It was definitely last minute as we met in the evening and they introduced the bill a few hours later that same night. It doesn’t get much more last minute than that. Was he pressured? I definitely think so. Not just by the public, but by some in the media as well. I think appearances on the Greta Van Susteren and Gov. Mike Huckabee shows are what tipped the balance and got us in. I think Gov. Huckabee was especially important in making the meeting happen. He was genuinely concerned that law enforcement was being excluded from the process and reached out to Sen. Rubio on our behalf. Many thanks to him for his attempts to help us.
BNN: What happened in the meeting? Did Sen. Rubio make any promises to you? Did he keep them?
CRANE: To start, even though I had requested to bring someone with me, Sen. Rubio denied the request and demanded that I come alone, which I still believe was highly peculiar and inappropriate. He, of course, had what appeared to be his entire staff in his office with me. Most of his staff stood behind me as there was no place for them to sit. I raised a series of strong concerns with the bill and, as I raised each issue, Sen. Rubio would look to his staff and ask if that was what the bill said. Each time his staff agreed with my interpretation, and Sen. Rubio would shake his head in disbelief and indicate the bill had to be changed.
Sen. Rubio talked very specifically and very directly to me and his staff saying that the changes I suggested had to be made and specifically said that other Gang of Eight members wouldn’t be happy, but “Oh, well.” Obviously the changes I suggested were all serious enforcement related issues; such as, establishing a biometric entry-exit system, and cracking down on sex offenders, gang members, violent criminals and other criminal aliens.
When I walked out of his office that night, I definitely thought the bill would undergo significant changes, but of course absolutely no changes were made.
BNN: Almost immediately after you met with Sen. Rubio, he introduced the bill. Did it include any of the changes you asked for?
CRANE: Not one of the changes we suggested was made to the bill before Sen. Rubio introduced it. All of his strong statements during our meeting about making the changes we suggested were apparently all just a dodge to get rid of me. It quickly became obvious why he didn’t permit me to take anyone with me to the meeting — he didn’t want any witnesses.
BNN: What happened during the press conference when you tried to ask Sen. Rubio and Chuck Schumer to take a question?
CRANE: I was polite, professional and respectful at all times. I didn’t interrupt anyone or cause a scene. The press was there, but Sen. Rubio and the rest of the Gang of Eight had also filled the large room with amnesty supporters and open borders people to cheer and applaud the Gang of Eight every time they said something. It was a real 'dog and pony show;' sort of a circus.
Because it wasn’t your traditional closed press conference, it didn’t seem at all out of place to me, as an American citizen, to politely ask these elected officials a question about the legislation they were there to discuss. After all, I thought that Congress was the People’s House
When the floor was opened to reporters to ask questions, I, too, politely raised my hand and asked, “Will you take a question from law enforcement?” The amnesty folks immediately started making hateful comments like: "You’re not welcome here." You need to leave." "You have no right to speak here".
A commotion took place on the stage with the Gang of Eight Senators. Sen. Rubio did look directly at me, and it appeared that he told Sen. Flake who I was. Yet, despite having looked directly at me, Sen. Rubio did absolutely nothing to allow me to ask a question on behalf of the nation’s ICE officers, sheriffs and front line law enforcement.
I was able to ask the same question approximately two more times before a Senate staffer - accompanied by Capitol Hill police approached - demanding that they escort me out. As I was escorted out by police, some within the amnesty groups applauded, laughed at me, and made hateful remarks. Once police escorted me outside of the main room. Police informed me that I was not free to go and that I was to be taken somewhere for questioning.
As a law enforcement officer, I knew that their actions met the legal standard for an arrest. At that point I demanded to know the charges against me and why I was being arrested. Television cameras, reporters and microphones came swooping in and, as they did, the Senate staffer scurried away like a cockroach, leaving the Capitol Hill police on their own. I was allowed to leave the area, but I think it was only because the police were afraid to handcuff me with reporters filming them.
Senator Rubio and the Gang of Eight stood there and watched it all happen. Any one of them could have jumped to the mic and yelled for the Senate staffer and the police to stop what they were doing to me, but none did. Sen. Rubio just stood there silently and watched it happen.
I am told that Sen. Rubio later stated that I should not have been removed, but he never reached out to me to say that or apologize. To my knowledge he and the Gang of Eight never called for an investigation.
If it had been Mark Zuckerberg in the crowd asking questions, the Gang of Eight Senators would have been tripping over themselves to kiss his backside, but as a normal citizen without the means to filter money into their campaigns, they had me forced out by police.
BNN: What did you mean when you said in Congressional testimony: “Never before have I seen such contempt for law enforcement officers as what I’ve seen from the Gang of Eight”?
CRANE: As ICE officers, we wrote a letter to Congress expressing strong concerns with the Gang of Eight bill. The letter was endorsed by approximately 150 Sheriffs, to include Sheriff Sam Page of the National Sheriffs Association Border Security and Immigration Committee, as well as, the National Association of Former Border Patrol Officers and other law enforcement groups. Law enforcement officers were screaming for help from the Gang of Eight to make changes to the bill that would better provide for public safety and national security, but the Gang of Eight ignored all of them. The Gang of Eight not only ignored law enforcement, but actively fought to keep our input out. Only wealthy special interests like the Chamber of Commerce were permitted to be a part of the process. It was dirty D.C. politics at its worst.
BNN: Sen. Rubio touted his bill as “The Toughest Border Security & Enforcement Measures In U.S. History,” do you believe this was an honest representation of the bill?
CRANE: I think that’s absolutely false – there was no real promise or guarantee of stronger border security. The bill actually relinquished Congress’ authority to establish border security measures to the head of DHS. The head of DHS then had something like so six months to unilaterally develop a border security plan after the Gang of Eight bill passed. So not only was there no real plan, but Sen. Rubio apparently thought that giving a presidentially-appointed bureaucrat god-like powers over America’s immigration system was the answer to border security, this as other Republicans are fighting corrupt and incompetent bureaucrats in agencies like the IRS and Secret Service, not to mention the unlawful policies on immigration enforcement enacted by the current President. Rather than being touted as the toughest border security and enforcement plan in history, it could more accurately be touted as the worst.
BNN: Sen. Rubio pledged his bill would provide enforcement first, do you believe this was an honest representation the bill?
CRANE: No, I don’t believe it was an honest representation. Protection from deportation, a type of de facto amnesty, came almost immediately as the first step in a much broader amnesty like process provided in the bill. There was no real promise of border security in the bill, and the bill provided nothing for interior enforcement, but instead made legalization of criminal aliens and gang members a priority. People need to understand that this bill was written by pro-amnesty and open borders groups that have no concern for America’s borders or the safety of its communities. It shouldn’t surprise anyone that the bill was such a lopsided mess.
BNN: Sen. Rubio’s bill legalized sex offenders, drunk drivers, and others with criminal records. From an ICE officer’s perspective, how do you feel about his decision to legalize illegal immigrants with criminal convictions?
CRANE: Under the Obama Administration, ICE released estimates stating that approximately 2 million criminal aliens resided in the U.S. That’s 10 times the size the U.S. Marine Corps, at least when I was in. And I think ICE’s estimates are low. People need to wake up. We can’t continue to keep taking millions of the world’s criminals without expecting serious repercussions to public safety and expense and burden to our legal system. Local and state jurisdictions are already overwhelmed by the criminal alien problem in our country. To turn this around and get things back under control, the U.S. must take the opposite approach. We must send criminals back to their countries. Especially sex offenders. I can’t understand why any lawmaker or special interest group would support legalizing sex offenders, but it shows how out of control the bill really was.
BNN: In your letter, you specifically protested that the bill would legalize gang members. As an ICE officer, how do you feel that this provision was left in the bill?
CRANE: It disgusts me. Violent street gangs were literally able to lobby Sen. Rubio and the Gang of Eight more effectively than law enforcement. They had more influence on the bill than we did. Gangs were able to get provisions in the law to protect themselves. It’s absolutely insane.
What on earth are our lawmakers thinking? I think it’s this type of utterly stupid lawmaking that has caused most Americans to lose faith in Congress.
BNN: Sen. Rubio was on television and radio constantly promoting his bill, which was backed by powerful special interests. What did you learn about Sen. Rubio’s character during that time?
CRANE: In my opinion, Sen. Rubio absolutely knowingly mislead the American people regarding the bill. He was not telling the American public the truth about what that bill contained. Every American will have to determine on their own what that says about his character, but for me I don’t think I’ll ever be able to trust him again.
BNN: What is life like for ICE officers, and what has Sen. Rubio done to help or hurt quality of life for ICE officers?
CRANE: Sen. Rubio has never done anything to help ICE officers do their jobs. With less than 5,000 officers in the United States, Guam, Puerto Rico, Saipan and the U.S. Virgin Islands, Senator Rubio’s Gang of Eight bill provided zero additional ICE officers and zero new resources for ICE officers to enforce U.S. immigration law on the interior of the U.S. This as almost half of all immigration violators entered the U.S. legally and overstayed their visas, so they would have never come in contact with the Border Patrol. So with a force half the size of the Los Angeles Police Department, ICE is tasked with apprehending and deporting over 11 million illegal aliens spread across the entire U.S.
But Sen. Rubio and the Gang of Eight gave ICE no additional resources. Why? Because they don’t want interior enforcement. Or I should say the Chamber of Commerce and other special interests involved in writing Sen. Rubio’s bill don’t want interior enforcement. Last year, ICE was ranked 314th — or dead last — in morale among 314 federal agencies surveyed by the Office of Personnel Management. Survey data for this year indicates morale at ICE continued to drop this year, even though ICE ranked 318 out of 320 agencies surveyed.
ICE is literally crumbling from within, but efforts by Sen. Rubio and the Gang of Eight were clearly more focused on legalizing criminals than assisting this agency in turmoil.
BNN: Could you compare the Gang of Eight’s treatment of powerful special interests to the Gang of Eight’s treatment of law enforcement?
CRANE: Law enforcement was treated like absolute trash. Republicans and Democrats in the Gang of Eight saw law enforcement as the enemy. We were the only ones really positioned to tell America that their bill was one big lie that wouldn’t fix our immigration problems but make them worse. They did everything they could to keep us out of the picture and silent. Special interests on the other hand were treated like kings. It was all about money. If we had the money, like the Chamber of Commerce and Mark Zuckerberg, we could buy America an immigration law that put the safety of both the American public and immigrants first, but we don’t. So it looks like America will have to settle for the open borders and cheap labor plan the Chamber of Commerce is buying.
BNN: Has Sen. Rubio ever reached out to apologize to you for any of his broken promises during Gang of Eight? Has he ever reached out to you to get ICE officer input for his presidential campaign?
CRANE: Sen. Rubio has never apologized for excluding law enforcement from having input on the bill, or for failing to make the changes discussed at our meeting, or for what happened at the press conference, and he has certainly never sought our input for his presidential campaign or anything else related to the immigration problems our nation now faces.
BNN: What do you make of the fact that some of the same people who funded Sen. Rubio’s immigration plan are now funding his campaign?
CRANE: I think it’s clear that open borders and amnesty proponents are trying to buy their way into the White House. I think that if elected President, Sen. Rubio’s Gang of Eight bill will be reintroduced and this time it will pass. Voters beware.
BNN: Has Sen Rubio done anything to earn back trust of law enforcement officers?
CRANE: No, not according to anyone in law enforcement that I’ve spoken with. Most law enforcement in areas hit hard by the criminal alien problem continue to resent what he attempted to do in the Gang of Eight bill and his exclusion of law enforcement from its development.
BNN: Sen. Rubio has said in several settings that he would not immediately terminate DACA or rescind amnesty papers already issued – what is your response to that as an ICE officer?
CRANE: DACA has resulted in tens of thousands of children being thrown across the U.S. border. Countless numbers of these children have been sexually assaulted, murdered or become trafficking victims – and they just keep coming. If Sen. Rubio were truly concerned with protecting these kids, he would immediately terminate DACA and remove this carrot that continues to draw these children and place them at risk. Many politicians just don’t seem to get it: Enforcing our laws saves lives. It is the truly humanitarian approach to our immigration problems.
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/02/19/eve-south-carolina-vote-nations-ice-officers-detail-marco-rubio-betrayed/#disqus_thread
Wednesday, February 24, 2016
U.S. Supreme Court Gives Itself Authority Over Congress and Citizens
Today, 1803 – U.S. Supreme Court Gives Itself Authority Over Congress and Citizens
Written by Dave Jolly
How often have you heard of a federal court declaring a law to be unconstitutional?
One example that comes to mind is when the Arizona state legislature passed Senate Bill 70 back in the 2010.
Since Obama refused to do anything to protect the border or American citizens, Arizona took it upon themselves to pass their own immigration law. However, the very people the law targeted protested and gained the support of Obama’s anti-American Justice Department who joined the effort to challenge the constitutionality of Arizona’s immigration law and the case ended up in the US Supreme Court.
The high court struck down several key provisions in the law, claiming they were unconstitutional. In so doing, they handcuffed Arizona law enforcement officers, making it more difficult to serve and protect the citizens of the state.
More recently, the US Supreme Court struck down marriage laws and constitutional amendments of four states. In most of the instances, the majority of the people in those states voted to protect marriage and families. When sinful homosexuals protested, once again the liberal high court ruled the state constitutional amendments to be unconstitutional. Thus the perverted agendas of 5 members of the Supreme Court overruled the majority of citizens in each of the 4 states in question.
So how did they get the power to overrule the people, state legislatures and even Congress?
Congress?
The Supreme Court was established by Article III of the US Constitution, but creating the lower federal courts was left to Congress.
In 1789, Congress passed the Judiciary Act of 1789 or more formally known as An Act to Establish the Judicial Courts of the United States. This act created the position of US Attorney General and the structure of the federal court system.
In the last days of John Adams’ presidency, he appointed a number of Federalists to various courts which became known as the midnight appointments. However, Madison ran out of time in delivering the appointments to everyone appointed. When Jefferson was sworn in, he quickly decided to not deliver the rest of the appointments, thus nullifying the undelivered commission.
Among the undelivered commissions was the one for William Marbury to be the new Justice of the Peace for Washington County in the District of Columbia. When Marbury learned of the nullification of his appointment, he filed suit and took his case to the US Supreme Court.
Ironically, Marbury won and lost in the court’s decision.
The Supreme Court issued their ruling on this day, February 24, 1803. Chief Justice John Marshall wrote the unanimous decision saying:
“It is emphatically the province and duty of the Judicial Department to say what the law is. Those who apply the rule to particular cases must, of necessity, expound and interpret that rule. If two laws conflict with each other, the Courts must decide on the operation of each.”Marshall concluded:
“Thus, the particular phraseology of the Constitution of the United States confirms and strengthens the principle, supposed to be essential to all written Constitutions, that a law repugnant to the Constitution is void, and that courts, as well as other departments, are bound by that instrument.”In other words, the high court’s decision gave themselves the authority to nullify any law passed by Congress and state legislatures and even by the majority vote of the people, if they believe it violates the US Constitution. Thus part of The Judiciary Act of 1789 was declared unconstitutional.
Supreme Court Stories: Marbury v. Madison
The "Supreme Court Stories" video series presents the true tales of people and events surrounding pivotal Supreme Court cases. In Marbury v. Madison, the first video of the series, political science professors Jocelyn Evans, Kirk Randazzo, David Woodard, and Kyle Kopko talk us through the election of 1800, the appointment of the "Midnight Judges," and the first instance of judicial review.
In recent years, this ruling by Marshall and the rest of the Supreme Court justices in 1803 has been abused more than it has been properly used. Liberals sitting on the high court first redefine the wording of the Constitution or read into it what is not there in order to promote their personal liberal agenda. Then they rule on the constitutionality of laws based upon their perverted interpretation of the Constitution.
Taking the example above about the recent ruling on marriage equality, there is nothing in the Constitution that says that states cannot pass their own laws to define what a legal marriage is. In fact, the 10th Amendment gives states the power and rights over the federal government unless the states so chose to give such power to the federal government.
In the case of defining marriage as the union of one man and one woman, the states never gave that power to the federal government. Instead many states passed laws and even amended their own constitutions to specify what marriage is and isn’t. Justice Ginsberg should have recused herself from the case since she had presided over some same-sex marriages prior to the Supreme Court hearing the case, but she knew she needed to be present in order to promote her agenda instead of ruling on what the Constitution really says.
Every time you hear any court declare a law, ordinance or even amendments to state constitutions as being unconstitutional, it all leads back to the Supreme Court ruling in the Marbury v. Madison case 213 years ago today.
Sources used for the above: Marbury v. Madison establishes judicial review; MARBURY V. MADISON; Marbury v. Madison; Marbury v. Madison (1803); Supreme Court Stories: Marbury v. Madison; ARIZONA’S IMMIGRATION ENFORCEMENT LAWS; Supreme Court rules in favor of marriage equality; Judiciary Act of 1789;
http://constitution.com/video-today-1803-u-s-supreme-court-gives-authority-congress-citizens/
District Court Demands Unseal Fast & Furious Records!
Yikes! District Court Demands Obama Administration Unseal Fast & Furious Records!
Government Watchdog Group Judicial Watch sued the DOJ after Congress found then Attorney General Eric Holder in contempt and after District Judge Amy Jackson ordered the Justice Department to provide certain documents.The Hill reported:
A federal judge on Tuesday ruled President Obama cannot use executive privilege to keep records on the "Fast and Furious" gun-tracking program from Congress.
U.S. District Court Judge Amy Berman Jackson ordered the administration to release documents that it has been attempting to withhold by asserting executive privilege.
The ruling also requires the administration to release to Congress all "segregable portions" of records they are withholding that are considered "attorney-client privileged material, attorney work product, private information, law enforcement sensitive material, or foreign policy sensitive material."
"The Department itself has already publicly revealed the sum and substance of the very material it is now seeking to withhold. Since any harm that would flow from the disclosures sought here would be merely incremental, the records must be produced," Jackson wrote, referencing a report from the DOJ's Office of Inspector General regarding Operation Fast and Furious.
Now, US District Judge Richard Leon, though saying the evidence led him to grant a ruling in the DOJ's favor, instead reversed the decision on February 12.
According to Courthouse News:
"Judge Jackson's statement, 'I don't want to know,' clearly bars the parties from divulging the contents of their settlement discussions only to her; a broader bar, if any, would have to be inferred for it is not explicit," Judge Douglas Ginsburg wrote for a three-judge panel.
The statement does not clearly refer to third parties, let alone protect responsive records from a Freedom of Information Act request, the court found.
"The Department offers a good reason Judge Jackson might have wanted to prohibit disclosure to third-parties - because protection from disclosure promotes more open dialogue during settlement - but there is no extrinsic evidence that was what the judge intended; indeed, that concern is nowhere mentioned in the record in this case, and it is equally plausible that Judge Jackson wanted simply to preserve her objectivity in case she ultimately were to preside over a trial," Ginsburg continued.
On remand, Judge Jackson must clarify what she intended by her statement.There is no question that the Justice Department and Eric Holder knew exactly what they were doing when they trafficked thousands of weapons into Mexico. That criminal action has cost the lives of hundreds of Mexicans, two US federal agents and no telling how many more that we have yet to discover.
Even as recently as January, we discovered that one of the guns from Fast and Furious, a .50-caliber rifle, made its way into the hands of drug kingpin El Chapo Guzman.
We know that there has been at least one drug cartel member that said the Obama administration was using Fast and Furious to supply guns to a Mexican drug cartel against a rival cartel.
The investigation into Fast and Furious has been met with roadblocks by the Obama administration as they are attempting to hide their crimes.
Remember, it was Barack Hussein Obama Soetoro Sobarkah who said, "The only people that don't want to disclose the truth, are people with something to hide."
It appears, he still has much to hide!
Reposted with Permission from Freedom Outpost
http://eaglerising.com/30793/yikes-district-court-demands-obama-administration-unseal-fast-furious-records/
Forcibly Vaccinate Citizens Via Chemtrails
WARNING: APPEARS CHEMTRAILS WILL DROP 'VACCINES' AND DEADLY VIRUSES FROM THE SKIES ON TO THE HUMAN POPULATIONS OF NATIONS (AMERICA)
February 12, 2016 by Sean Adl-Tabatabai
Australia have approved a license application from Big Pharma company PaxVax for the intentional release of a GMO vaccine consisting of live bacteria into Queensland, via chemtrails.
The Office of the Gene Technology Regulator (OGTR) says that the vaccine qualifies as a limited and controlled release under section 50A of the Gene Technology Act 2000.
Preventdisease.com reports: PaxVax is seeking approval to conduct the clinical trial of a genetically modified live bacterial vaccine against cholera.
Once underway the trial is expected to be completed within one year, with trial sites selected from local government areas (LGAs) in Queensland, South Australia, Victoria and Western Australia. PaxVax has proposed a number of control measures they say will restrict the spread and persistence of the GM vaccine and its introduced genetic material, however there is always a possiblity of these restrictions failing and infecting wildlife and ecosystems.
Aerial vaccines have used in the United States directed towards animals by the use of plastic packets dropped by planes or helicopters.
Sanofi (who is one of the largest vaccine manufacturers in the world) has subsidiary companies such as Merial Limited who manufacture Raboral, an oral live-virus poisonous to humans yet distributed wildlife in the masses.
WEST NILE VIRUS SPRAYING
In 2006 Michael Greenwood wrote an article for the Yale School of Public Health entitled, “Aerial Spraying Effectively Reduces Incidence of West Nile Virus (WNV) in Humans.” The article stated that the incidence of human West Nile virus cases can be significantly reduced through large scale aerial spraying that targets adult mosquitoes, according to research by the Yale School of Public Health and the California Department of Public Health.
Under the mandate for aerial spraying for specific vectors that pose a threat to human health, aerial vaccines known as DNA Vaccine Enhancements and Recombinant Vaccine against WNV may be tested or used to “protect” the people from vector infection exposures.
DNA vaccine enhancements specifically use Epstein-Barr viral capside’s with multi human complement class II activators to neutralize antibodies. The recombinant vaccines against WNV use Rabbit Beta-globulin or the poly (A) signal of the SV40 virus. In early studies of DNA vaccines it was found that the negative result studies would go into the category of future developmental research projects in gene therapy.
During the studies of poly (A) signaling of the SV40 for WNV vaccines, it was observed that WNV will lie dormant in individuals who were exposed to chicken pox, thus upon exposure to WNV aerial vaccines the potential for the release of chicken pox virus would cause a greater risk to having adult onset Shingles.
CALIFORNIA AERIAL SPRAYING for WNV and SV40
In February 2009 to present date, aerial spraying for the WNV occurred in major cities within the State of California. During spraying of Anaheim, CA a Caucasian female (age 50) was exposed to heavy spraying while doing her daily exercise of walking several miles. Heavy helicopter activity occurred for several days in this area. After spraying, she experienced light headedness, nausea, muscle aches and increased low back pain.
She was evaluated for toxicological mechanisms that were associated with pesticide exposure due to aerial spraying utilizing advanced biological monitoring testing. The test results which included protein band testing utilizing Protein Coupled Response (PCR) methods were positive for KD-45. KD-45 is the protein band for SV-40 Simian Green Monkey virus.
Additional tests were performed for Epstein-Barr virus capside and Cytomeglia virus which are used in bioengineering for gene delivery systems through viral protein envelope and adenoviral protein envelope technology. The individual was positive for both; indicating a highly probable exposure to a DNA vaccination delivery system through nasal inhalation.
Pentagon Document Revealed Aerial Vaccination Plans
In the Quarterly FunVax Review in June, 2007, the report lists the objective of a project listed as ID: 149AZ2 as a preparation of a viral vector that will inhibit/decrease the expression of a specific disruption gene (VMAT2) within a human population. It further indicates in the abstract that six methods of virus dispersal were tested including high altitude release, water supply release, insect transmission, and various methods of diffusion.
http://www.wanttoknow.info/health/funvax070601.pdf
YouTube censorship of "Syrian Refugee/muslim" problems and Donald Trump?
BELOW IS THE VIDEO REPORTED TO BEING
CENSORED
BY YOUTUBE REGARDING THE
MUSLIM REFUGEE PROBLEMS
(Syrian Refugees)
Published on Jan 13, 2016
At a campaign stop in Cedar Falls, Iowa, Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump uses a dramatic reading of Al Wilson’s 1968 song to warn of the dangers of taking in refugees from Syria. “The Snake” tells the story of a trusting woman who invites a snake into her home and saves it from the cold, but is later tricked and bitten by it.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
