This is an Awareness Blog to consider the future of your world. Actions are being done now to restore our freedom. County, State, and National Assemblies are forming across our world nullifying the corrupt corporations. Watch and become AWARE! Participate and be a part of making history!
62 MILLION VIEWS PER MONTH
Exclusive public outlet for documentation and notices from The Original Jurisdiction Republic 1861 circa 2010.
IS THIS THE 'SIGNAL' TO THE U.S.A./CIA/BLACK OPS 'MILITARY' SPONSORED 'ISIS TERRORISTS' THAT THE 'GAMES' ARE NOW RELEASED TO BEGIN ACROSS OUR NATION? WATCH FOR ON OR AROUND APRIL 10TH AND 15TH
Today, I got an email from a
group of Greek bankers asking me if the "Global Collateral Accounts"
are real and why they can't seem to get action releasing those funds even after
allocations have been made and published?
Well, yes, there are Global
Collateral Accounts that do contain assets that belonged to people long dead
and whose specific heirs are not known, and as a result those assets belong to
the world-at-large and there is really no reason to leave them sitting around
in bank deposit boxes and tranche flats doing no earthly good.
Fair enough. So some years ago a great housecleaning effort began in the Swiss vaults and has continued from there.
Unfortunately,
most of
the banks involved in the house cleaning effort used the opportunity to
try to
get rid of evidence of their own wrong-doing, tried to cheat depositors
out of
interest the banks owed, and otherwise pulled very shady deals claiming
that huge
amounts of assets were "abandoned" by legitimate trustees and known
beneficiaries when they really weren't abandoned at all----a larger
scale version of the fraud these same banks have pulled by claiming that
you abandoned all the mortgage payments that were made to YOUR NAME's
undisclosed escrow account over the years.
The irony is that most
of these "Historic Trusts" belong to people who have no interest in
wielding huge amounts of money and who want the assets used for the same or
similar purposes as the Global Collateral Accounts are meant to serve---that
is, they are willing to serve the same philanthropic purposes as the Global
Collateral Accounts. They simply aren't willing to stand by deaf, dumb,
and blind and let the banks make false claims of abandonment and seize the
assets.
Every time one of the
supposedly "abandoned" Historic Trusts pops up a hand and says---
Hey, wait a minute, those assets belong to us. We didn't abandon
anything!----the whole process has to be shut down and re-calibrated. The assets
of the Historic Trust being claimed back have to be backed out of the Slush
Pile.
A lot of time and
bother could be saved if the banks just gave proper Notice to the last known
address of the last known trustees and beneficiaries, but they are afraid to do
so for a wide variety of reasons. If you don't know that you are the heir
of a billion dollars, shouldn't you know? Where have you been all this
while? Are you for real or just some con man sniffing around?
It was the same thing
with the gold confiscated from our great-grandparents and grandparents back in
the 1930's, which the World Bank and IBRD claimed as Secondary Creditors.
If I hadn't raised my hand and said---- Oh, by the way..... those
assets and all the years of interest owed on them would have been rolled into
the Global Collateral Accounts.
Even
more importantly, it was the same with the assets of the land
jurisdiction states of America. Imagine what would have happened if
nobody stepped up to the plate and claimed back the land you are
standing on? This was a major league play by the banks. They actually
thought they could get away with claiming that the American states had
been abandoned and were available for resettlement and redistribution of
all their assets.
So
as you can now see, there's a lot going on in the background and a lot
of dirty deals have been pulled by the banks including a lot of false
claims of "abandonment of funds" and "abandonment of assets" which have
been made for both innocent and self-interested reasons.
All
that bosh keeps holding up settlement of what is and is not
legitimately part of the Global Collateral Accounts. More and more heirs
and beneficiaries and trustees and fiduciaries keep coming out of the
woodwork and showing reasonable provenance and basis to claim assets
back out of the banker's Slush Pile.
Every
time we think we get it done, or "close enough to call"--- pop! Someone
else shows up at the table and produces a receipt for a thousand Gold
Certificates from 1904, or the last scion of one of the Conquistadors
crawls out from under a rock in Costa Rica and says, "Uh, well-ah,
Senor......."
If
we are fair and if we are honest and if we care about what is true, we
owe each and every one of these claims investigation and settlement.
And that takes time, especially in view of the amount of fraud and graft
and collusion and general bad behavior by too many of the banks
involved.
----------------------------- See this article and over 500 others on Anna's website here:www.annavonreitz.com
I don't believe that people or their institutions have any ability to
contract. It's simply not within our temporal nature and skill set. We
can't guarantee that we will live another minute. We can't know what
time it is in any absolute sense. We can't even describe where we are,
physically, without arbitrary references.
For
mortals who don't know where they are and don't know what time it is to
make contracts obligating themselves to do things in the future----is
obvious madness. We are incompetent and fundamentally unable to do any
such thing, so all contracts are void ab initio, for intrinsic fraud.
We
are like mice trying to dictate the life cycle of horses. Making
contracts is simply not something we can do, so we ought to stop
pretending otherwise.
Once we acknowledge the
facts of our limited nature and circumstance we are prepared to deal
with things --- including ourselves --- as we really are.
If
we accept our natural limitations and humbly agree to the best of our
ability on a course of action, that is not a contract. That is a Good
Faith Agreement.
If we further make the
effort to express that agreement in a way that is mathematically sound
and unequivocal, using Parse Syntax, it in no way confers any
supernatural power to keep the agreement; rather, Parse Syntax makes
sure that the agreement says exactly what it says, no more and no less,
and cuts out confusion and arguments--which is surely something much to
be desired.
For myself I prefer a simple
honor code in which we let our yes be yes and our no be no, as the Bible
says, and to the extent possible, let our word be our bond--- accepting
always that "time and unforeseen circumstance" may derail our most
earnest efforts and intentions and forgiving each other when that
happens.
The concept of "Good Faith" is not
difficult, but it is not possible to maintain when we pretend and tell
lies about ourselves and our limited abilities. Nor is Good Faith
something we can maintain without sincere effort and clear
communications. It is in this last capacity that Parse Syntax can serve
humanity in noble purpose: put an end to the use of slippery, slithery,
descriptive language when making business agreements.
Parse
Syntax, properly and honestly defined, is an "iron rod". If not an
absolute safeguard against misunderstanding, it is as close as we are
likely to come until the day that we can communicate telepathically and
record the sum total of all thoughts, intentions, and feelings
associated with an agreement.
Most of my days I
spend immersed in sorting out confusions that are the result of both
honest and dishonest actions. People regularly come away from the same
conversation with different assumptions and they take different actions
accordingly. This causes no end of confusion and discord, even when it
is done innocently and for no dishonest purpose. Imagine how crazy it
gets when people purposefully seek to confuse things and defraud others?
Parse Syntax can help people deal more
clearly and honestly with each other. That isn't always what people
want to do, but Parse Syntax can go a long way toward ensuring that
result.
I would guess that if Parse Syntax
were used to express Good Faith Agreements, 99% of the expense and
misery associated with today's commercial court system could simply go
away.
And wouldn't that be a blessing?
----------------------------- See this article and over 500 others on Anna's website here:www.annavonreitz.com
In his latest #onlyatYAF lecture, Lt. Col. Allen West heads to the University of Georgia tonight to talk about fighting radical Islam. As a 22-year Army veteran, Lt. Col. West has witnessed the destructive power of radical Islam firsthand. Tonight, he will lay out a plan to defeat this evil force and provide for a safer, more secure America.
Join us live from home tonight for this fiery event! The event begins tonight at 8:00 PM EDT
, and students will be asking questions following the lecture.
This event is made possible by The Fred Allen Lecture Series. Young America’s Foundation works with top-notch speakers like Allen West to bring a message of limited government, personal responsibility, and individual liberty to campuses all over the country, and thanks to our expanded YAF LIVE program, you're invited to attend each event alongside the students!
A
massive chemical weapons attack hit an area of the northern Idlib
province in Syria on Tuesday, followed by a bombing run on hospitals
where victims were undergoing treatment.
According to Fox News and
the Associated Press, Syrian medical relief organization UOSSM reported
least 100 people were killed and 400 more injured. Some other estimates
put the death toll as low as 57. The London-based Syrian Observatory
for Human Rights added that at least 11 children were among the dead.
The Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons is reportedly investigating the incident.
The UK Independentreports
that an AFP journalist saw rubble crashing down on the medical staff
treating patients at one hospital, while as-yet-unverified footage
showed an explosion striking a hospital while a reporter was
interviewing doctors on-camera.
“The Syrian Civil Defence rescue group said two of its centres were
targeted by air strikes – one in Khan Sheikhoun and one in nearby Habit.
The group said none of its volunteers were injured but the damage put
the facilities out of service,” the Independent writes. Khan Sheikhoun is about 30 miles south of the city of Idlib.
The BBC
interviewed a reporter and ambulance driver who observed people choking
in the streets after the chemical weapon strikes. The relief service
this ambulance driver works for published photographs depicting “what
appeared to be at least seven dead children in the back of a pick-up
truck,” with no sign of traumatic injuries on their bodies.
One AFP journalist reported seeing “a young girl, a woman
and two elderly people dead at a hospital, all with foam still visible
around their mouths.” The facility where this gruesome tableau was
observed was subsequently hit by a rocket strike, burying doctors under
rubble.
A Syrian medical activist reported at least 18 “critical cases” of
unconscious people bleeding from the nose and mouth to the Associated
Press. Another eyewitness, a photographer for the Idlib Media Center,
said he found “entire families inside their homes, lying on the floor,
eyes wide open and unable to move.” He reported feeling a burning
sensation after he touched their clothing.
The BBC notes these symptoms are consistent with the use of sarin
gas, which causes death by asphyxiation within a matter of minutes, and
is very difficult to detect. The Syrian government has allegedly used
sarin gas on previous occasions. The regime of dictator Bashar Assad
denied using the gas and blamed rebel fighters for deploying it.
CBS News
reports the Syrian and Russian governments “flatly denied any
responsibility” for the attack. The Russian defense Ministry denied
conducting any airstrikes on the Khan Sheikhoun area, while Syrian
officials “repeated blanket denials of ever having used chemical
weapons,” and in fact denied targeting anyone except “terrorists” at
all.
CBS posted Tweets from a man identifying himself as a British-trained
physician performing volunteer work in northern Syria, claiming he
found evidence of a Sarin gas attack:
Do u still doubt that #Sarin is being used on us? Non-reactive pinpoint pupils! We have samples. Will anyone care!? Who will stop it?#Syriapic.twitter.com/WmhDZgLVA6
Several British analysts and officials also told CBS they believed a
nerve agent was deployed in the attack, while the British government
formally stated that photos from Khan Sheikhoun “strongly suggest the
use of chemical weapons.” One analyst said the symptoms resembled the
notorious Ghouta attack of 2013 that crossed President Barack Obama’s
rhetorical “red line” against WMD. The upshot of that epic Obama
administration debacle was Syria supposedly destroying its chemical
weapons stockpile under the watchful eye of Russia.
British Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson declared himself
“horrified” and said the attack “bears all the hallmarks” of the Syrian
government. He stated the British government will “continue to lead
international efforts to hold perpetrators to account.”
Britain and France have called for an emergency meeting of the U.N.
Security Council to discuss the attack, and urged Russia and China not
to block international action against the responsible parties.
Israeli President Benjamin Netanyahu quickly weighed in on the
attack. He said the “shocking pictures” from Idlib should “shake every
human being.”
“Israel strongly condemns the use of chemical weapons in any
situation, especially against innocent civilians. Israel calls on the
international community to fulfill promises made in 2013, and to remove
chemical weapons from Syria,” Netanyahu said.
The Jerusalem Postquotes
former Israeli military intelligence chief Amos Yadlin calling upon
Israel to “establish a more active policy against the negative
developments” and make Assad “pay for his war crimes.” He complained of
the void in global authority left by Obama’s “red line” collapse, and
said the void was filled by “Russia, the Islamic State, and Hezbollah.”
“Today’s chemical attack in Syria against innocent people including
women and children is reprehensible and cannot be ignored by the
civilized world. These heinous actions by the Bashar al-Assad regime are
a consequence of the past administration’s weakness and irresolution,” said White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer on Tuesday.
“President Obama said in 2012 he would establish a red line against
the use of chemical weapons and then did nothing. The United States
stands with our allies across the globe to condemn this intolerable
act,” Spicer continued.
Two
engineering students were biking across a university campus when
one said,
"Where did you get such a great bike?"
The
second engineer replied, "Well, I was walking along yesterday,
minding my
own business, when a beautiful woman rode up on this bike, threw
it to the
ground, took off all her clothes and said, "Take what you
want."
The
first engineer nodded approvingly and said, "Good choice: The
clothes probably
wouldn't have fit you anyway."
Understanding Engineers #2 To
the optimist, the glass is half-full. To the pessimist, the
glass is half-empty.
To the engineer, the glass is twice as big as it needs to be.
Understanding Engineers #3
A
priest, a doctor, and an engineer were waiting one morning for
a particularly
slow group of golfers. The engineer fumed, "What's with those guys?
We must have been waiting for fifteen minutes!"
The
doctor chimed in, "I don't know, but I've never seen such inept
golf!"
The
priest said, "Here comes the greens-keeper. Let's have a word
with him." He
said, "Hello George, What's wrong with that group ahead of us?
They're rather
slow, aren't they?"
The
greens-keeper replied, "Oh, yes. That's a group of blind
firemen. They lost
their sight saving our clubhouse from a fire last year, so we
always let
them play for free anytime!."
The
group fell silent for a moment. The priest said, "That's so sad.
I think I
will say a special prayer for them tonight."
The
doctor said, "Good idea. I'm going to contact my
ophthalmologist colleague
and see if there's anything she can do for them."
The
engineer said, "Why can't they play at night?"
Understanding Engineers #4
What
is the difference between mechanical engineers and civil
engineers?
Three
engineering students were gathered together discussing who must
have designed
the human body. One said, "It was a mechanical engineer. Just
look at
all the joints."
Another
said, "No, it was an electrical engineer. The nervous system
has many
thousands of electrical connections."
The
last one said, "No, actually it had to have been a civil
engineer. Who else
would run a toxic waste pipeline through a recreational
area?"
Understanding Engineers #6
Normal
people believe that if it ain't broke, don't fix it.
Engineers believe
that if it ain't broke, it doesn't have enough features yet.
Understanding Engineers #7
An
engineer was crossing a road one day, when a frog called out to
him and said,
"If you kiss me, I'll turn into a beautiful princess." He bent
over, picked
up the frog, and put it in his pocket. The frog spoke up again
and said,
"If you kiss me, I'll turn back into a beautiful princess and
stay with
you for one week."
The
engineer took the frog out of his pocket, smiled at it and
returned it to
the pocket.
The
frog then cried out, "If you kiss me and turn me back into a
princess, I'll
stay with you for one week and do anything you want."
Again,
the engineer took the frog out, smiled at it and put it back
into his pocket.
Finally,
the frog asked, "What is the matter? I've told you I'm a
beautiful princess
and that I'll stay with you for one week and do anything you
want. Why
won't you kiss me?"
The
engineer said, "Look, I'm an engineer. I don't have time for
a girlfriend,
but a talking frog - now that's cool."
Two engineers???
Two
engineers were standing at the base of a flagpole, looking at
its top. A woman
walked by and asked what they were doing.
"We're
supposed to find the height of this flagpole," said one, "but
we don't
have a ladder."
The
woman took a wrench from her purse, loosened a couple of bolts,
and laid the
pole down on the ground. Then she took a tape measure from
her pocketbook,
took a measurement, and announced, "Twenty one feet, six inches,"
and walked away.
One
engineer shook his head and laughed, "A lot of good that does
us. We ask for
the height and she gives us the length!"
Both
engineers have since quit their engineering jobs and are
currently serving
in the United States Congress.
FORGET ABOUT PELOSI AND SCHUMER THESE THREE ARE TRUMP'S REAL ENEMIES
Never Mind Schumer and Pelosi…President Trump’s Real Enemies are McCain, McConnell and Ryan
Politics makes strange bedfellows, and no doubt, any person who relishes longevity in a political career must be reconciled to staying extremely agile in pursuit of the right bed to jump in and out of. In a world where friends alternate roles as friends or enemies almost as quickly as changing socks, words like commitment, longevity and loyalty ultimately matter little. In their most common usage relative to the current American political scene, they are at best used as a punchline.
We accept the splutterings of the cognitively impaired Nancy Pelosi, who shamelessly persists in peddling the tabloid drivel about Russian collusion with Donald Trump, even though neither the F.B.I. nor the National Security Administration to date has yet to find a scintilla of evidence in support of such intrigue.
We also accept the angst of Democrats because they lost the White House and of Chuck Schumer, who becomes sullen and prone to crying fits, especially when Executive Orders designed to protect Americans at home are perceived to be a violation of the “inherent rights”of illegal aliens from Muslim countries potentially bent on destroying us. We accept these dramatics from the opposition party as a de facto component of day-to-day national politics.
Yes, we expect that from the likes of the aforementioned. Is this however the real threat against Donald Trump?
Closer scrutiny suggests that the President need not cross the aisle to find determined and resolute enemies. Within his own party, unscrupulous, traitorous and equally determined politicians are just as focused on derailing the nascent Trump Presidency. As vicious, calculating and motivated to undermine as any among the Democratic party, the real “Fifth Column” against Trump is embodied by three Republicans In Name Only (RINO).
Take John McCain as a primary example. He is an idea
whose time has passed, a relic, a begrudger and worst of all, a man bent on maintaining the status quo for no other reason then slaking his own over inflated ego.
This is a man who passes himself off as member of the United States Senate, and then stands before an audience of Nato/European member nations stating with conviction how his own Republican President’s administration is in a state of disarray. This is a man who is the most recognizable face of the “political establishment,” a man who stood on the same stage with Barack Obama in 2008 and stated with convincing self-righteousness how the American economy was sound, even as the tidal wave of economic collapse was washing the homes, pensions, businesses and savings of millions of ordinary Americans into the sewer.
It is a stroke of good fortune that McCain is now the doddering old idiot he is, because the likelihood of his running and being elected for another chance to retain power in the Senate beyond his current term is probably not too great if, in fact, he makes it to the end of his term. That at least is one silver lining in the cloud for decent and honest Americans. His Obama/Kerry formula of constant regime change apparently has never been enough, and he certainly seemed during various junctures of the Presidential campaign that Hillary Clinton’s election to the White House would have been more happily received. Why not, as Clinton would have gotten in McCain a sure fire choir boy for beating the confrontation drum against depraved and immoral Russia, with McCain simultaneously playing his now famous parody of the lyrics to the Beach Boys song “Barbra Ann”: bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb Iran…
They still would have both been able to espouse their hypocritical condemnations of Putin’s Russian regime, even though Clinton previously sanctioned the sale of substantial amounts of uranium as Secretary of State to the same enemy nation while McCain, as recently as New Year’s Eve, accepted a state medal from Petro Poroshenko, The Order of the Ukraine, for bestowing legitimacy on a blatantly neo-Fascist, genocidal and loathsome political regime–a regime which is a blight and insult to civilization.
Why would President Trump seek solace and support for attempting to normalize relations with Putin from such an acolyte of Neocon fanaticism as John McCain? The truth is, McCain was never a supporter of Trump nor ever will be. The best advice for Trump would be to marginalize the increasingly strident voice of McCain with respect to Russia, showing him to be out of touch with the forces that propelled Trump to victory in the general election. In this way, Trump may yet be able to forge a significant working relationship with Putin, while John McCain can continue to be a specially invited guest to neo-Nazi style rallies in Kiev.
Following closely on the heals of McCain is the amorphous, colorless but extremely powerful Majority Leader of the Senate, Mitch McConnell. He is a man characterized by his closest friends as one who has spent his entire political life in the pursuit of penultimate power. Now that he has it, what will he do with it?
It is a question that many of his closest observers have a ready answer for: absolutely nothing! McConnell doesn’t stand for anything, doesn’t believe in anything and is not going to do anything, especially if it upsets the dynamic of the next election cycle. Someone with as little charisma, and as lacking in political convictions spells real problems for the Trump legislative agenda.
Does McConnell have the stomach to push for the kinds of major ideological changes involved in the Trump vision for America, or is he merely concerned in self-preservation? A recent legislative initiative gives mounds of insight into this Republican establishment figure’s lack of moral and political courage.
Kate Steinle, a thirty-two-year-old San Francisco woman, shot down in cold blood by an illiterate, illegal Mexican immigrant, who had been deported and illegally returned to the United States not once but six times, became the poster child for everything that is wrong with respect to the current illegal immigration debacle in the U.S.
Legislation was proposed making it a Federal crime, punishable by a mandatory prison term of 5 years, for any illegal immigrant who has been deported and returned illegally to the United States a second time and caught. The Legislation passed the House, but this was not to be the case in the Senate, where rather than having a stand alone vote on the measure, McConnell included the legislation in a bill that would take away money from sanctuary cities, something that the Democrats would filibuster, ergo, no passage of Kate’s law.
This was a cowardly act on the part of Mitch McConnell. The interests of an illegal alien were more important than protecting an American citizen, in this case, an American citizen with a blossoming life full of wondrous potential, cut down at her own father’s side by a drug-dealing parasite with a second grade education who didn’t belong in the country to begin with. McConnell’s office steadfastly refused to answer calls inquiring as to the rationale for his obvious and unmanly failure of leadership; it just wasn’t good politics to upset the apple cart.
The big question for President Trump is whether Senate Republicans, now holding a slight majority, have the kind of leader in Mitch McConnell who will be willing and able to carry the ball far enough down field to score? This should be a great source of concern for team Trump.
In line with questions about Senate loyalties to the Administration, we come finally to the House of Representatives and its dishonest and incompetent leader, Paul Ryan. Another fair day supporter of Trump during the last Presidential election cycle, Paul Ryan worked less for getting Trump elected then attempting to sabotage his campaign.
Nobody will ever accuse Ryan of being a Thomas Brackett Reed. He has richly proven himself to be an incompetent legislative leader, with a penchant for ass-kissing liberals, dismissing moderates as lacking in conviction and rounding on conservatives, a reflexive action common to establishment Republicans.
Take the ACHA, the alternative to OBamacare fast-tracked to failure, courtesy of those intractable Freedom Caucus conservatives…Or was it? Paul Ryan has taken tons of cash from the insurance industry, and his disingenuous attempt to downplay his inability to deliver the votes of moderate Republicans in connection to his pathetic piece of legislation was just that, pathetic.
The truth is, something Speaker Ryan has a hard time with, is that those same moderates Ryan claims would never have gone along with repealing the worst aspects of Obamacare were the very same moderates who voted to repeal it sixty times. This time, when it actually mattered, they got free passes for not even having to vote, courtesy of the unprincipled and undisciplined leadership of Paul Ryan. It was a lot easier to blame those uncompromising conservatives, folks who actually believe in keeping their campaign promises to voters.
In the aftermath of this stunning defeat, Ryan took to the airwaves to insist that it was the “effort” rather than the final outcome that was key, and that trying to foist a piece of legislation that enjoyed an approval rating of 17% was worthy of our eternal thanks. At another time in our country’s history, such a display would have been viewed as shameful and even cowardice; it has now taken on the trappings of sage pragmatism.
It is a cruel testament to just how poorly our leaders govern the country. In the final analysis, Republicans said in 2010 that once they got the House, they would do away with ObamaCare, instead, when they got the majority, they funded it. They said give us the Senate, and we will do away with ObamaCare. When they got the Senate, they funded it.
Ryan said when we get a Republican President, we will send Health Care legislation to be signed into law. Trump won, no thanks to Ryan, and what did Ryan do? Rather than pressuring a handful of moderates to honor their previous votes, he introduced a thoroughly dishonest and inferior bill that he knew could never pass, and blamed the few conservatives who did not sell out their constituents. If this is the best that Republicans can do, they are not going to be in government for long.
President Trump would do well to grow eyes in the back of his head. His election has shaken an entrenched establishment of people used to having power, wielding power to achieve their own purposes and not willing to give it up. Never mind Democrats, but with respect to his own Republican party, he would do well to follow the advice of Don Vito Corleone, who advised his son Michael of the extreme importance of keeping friends close, but enemies closer. A more appropriate statement might be to have more enemies than friends, because at least you know where you stand with your enemies!
Are you in doubt that the real original jurisdiction De Jure Republic is being restored? Do you have Questions that you want answered? Do you want to get involved? Visit https://national-assembly.net/ for more information and to participate. Check out the forums as the national assembly is 100% transparent to the public and welcomes public participation. This is the real deal folks. This is our last chance to do it right and nullify the 1871 contract that employed the U.S. Corporation to provide 19 governmental services to the people. This is our right under Article 1 of the Bill of rights. This also nullifies General Order 100 of 1863.
Search This Blog "if this search box is working"
Donation to assist in efforts to restore our republic
The DUKE - Patriot!
Born in 1948 Died in 2015
National Assembly of the people returning to self governance
Join the forums and introduce yourself so your state coordinator can connect with you.
Question -- What is the goal of this website? Why do we share different sources of information that sometimes conflicts or might even be considered disinformation?
Answer -- The primary goal of Nesaranews is to help all people become better truth-seekers in a real-time boots-on-the-ground fashion. This is for the purpose of learning to think critically, discovering the truth from within—not just believing things blindly because it came from an "authority" or credible source. Instead of telling you what the truth is, we share information from many sources so that you can discern it for yourself. We focus on teaching you the tools to become your own authority on the truth, gaining self-mastery, sovereignty, and freedom in the process. We want each of you to become your own leaders and masters of personal discernment, and as such, all information should be vetted, analyzed and discerned at a personal level. We also encourage you to discuss your thoughts in the comments section of this site to engage in a group discernment process.
"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it." – Aristotle
11
Followers
The articles on this blog are reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
US Supreme Court, in 1985, “Dowling v. United States”, unequivocally held that allegations of copyright infringement can be prosecuted only under copyright-specific legislation, not criminal law.
